DOCSLIB.ORG

Susquehanna County FINAL 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan Susquehanna County Emergency Management Agency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Susquehanna County FINAL 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan Susquehanna County Emergency Management Agency MCM Consulting Group, Inc. Susquehanna County FINAL 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan Susquehanna County Emergency Management Agency Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan Certification of Annual Review Meetings PUBLIC DATE OF YEAR OUTREACH SIGNATURE MEETING ADDRESSED? * 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 *Confirm yes here annually and describe on record of change page. i Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan Record of Changes DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE MADE, MITIGATION ACTION COMPLETED, CHANGE MADE CHANGE MADE DATE OR PUBLIC OUTREACH BY (PRINT NAME) BY (SIGNATURE) PERFORMED REMINDER: Please attach all associated meeting agendas, sign-in sheets, handouts and minutes. ii Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Certification of Annual Review Meetings ....................................................................... i Record of Changes ....................................................................................................... ii Figures ........................................................................................................................ v Tables ........................................................................................................................ vii 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Purpose ........................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Scope .............................................................................................................. 2 1.4. Authority and Reference .................................................................................. 2 2. Community Profile ................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Geography and Environment........................................................................... 4 2.1. Community Facts ............................................................................................ 5 2.3. Population and Demographics......................................................................... 6 2.4. Land Use and Development ............................................................................. 8 2.5. Data Sources .................................................................................................. 8 3. Planning Process ................................................................................................. 13 3.1. Update Process and Participation Summary .................................................. 13 3.2. The Planning Team ....................................................................................... 14 3.3. Meetings and Documentation ........................................................................ 17 3.4. Public and Stakeholder Participation ............................................................ 18 3.5. Multi-Jurisdictional Planning ........................................................................ 19 4. Risk Assessment ................................................................................................. 21 4.1. Update Process Summary ............................................................................. 21 4.2. Hazard Identification ..................................................................................... 22 4.2.1. Presidential and Gubernatorial Disaster Declarations ............................. 22 4.2.2. Summary of Hazards .............................................................................. 24 4.2.3. Climate Change ...................................................................................... 31 4.3. Hazard Profiles .............................................................................................. 33 4.3.1. Drought .................................................................................................. 33 iii Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan 4.3.2. Earthquake ............................................................................................. 41 4.3.3. Flood, Flash Flood and Ice Jams ............................................................. 47 4.3.4. Hailstorms .............................................................................................. 67 4.3.5. Hurricane, Tropical Storms, Nor’easter ................................................... 71 4.3.6. Invasive Species ...................................................................................... 76 4.3.7. Landslides .............................................................................................. 86 4.3.8. Lightning Strike ...................................................................................... 90 4.3.9. Pandemic and Infectious Disease ............................................................ 93 4.3.10. Radon Exposure .................................................................................. 99 4.3.11. Tornados and Windstorms ................................................................. 105 4.3.12. Wildfire .............................................................................................. 115 4.3.13. Winter Storms ................................................................................... 125 4.3.14. Cyber Attack ...................................................................................... 145 4.3.15. Dam Failure ...................................................................................... 148 4.3.16. Environmental Hazards ..................................................................... 148 4.3.17. Opioid Epidemic ................................................................................ 158 4.3.18. Terrorism ........................................................................................... 164 4.3.19. Transportation Accidents ................................................................... 170 4.3.20. Utility Interruptions ........................................................................... 179 4.4. Hazard Vulnerability Summary ................................................................ 187 4.4.1. Methodology ......................................................................................... 187 4.4.2. Ranking Results ................................................................................... 189 4.4.3. Potential Loss Estimates ....................................................................... 194 4.4.4. Future Development and Vulnerability ................................................. 195 5. Capability Assessment ....................................................................................... 197 5.1. Update Process Summary ........................................................................... 197 5.2. Capability Assessment Findings .................................................................. 198 5.2.1. Planning and Regulatory Capability ...................................................... 198 5.2.2. Administrative and Technical Capability ............................................... 204 5.2.3. Financial Capability .............................................................................. 208 5.2.4. Education and Outreach ....................................................................... 210 iv Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan 5.2.5. Plan Integration .................................................................................... 211 6. Mitigation Strategy ............................................................................................ 215 6.1. Update Process Summary ........................................................................... 215 6.2. Mitigation Goals and Objectives .................................................................. 223 6.3. Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Techniques ................................... 225 6.4. Mitigation Action Plan ................................................................................. 228 7. Plan Maintenance .............................................................................................. 242 7.1. Update Process Summary ........................................................................... 242 7.2. Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan ............................................ 242 7.3. Continued Public Involvement ..................................................................... 243 8. Plan Adoption .................................................................................................... 244 8.1. Resolutions ................................................................................................. 244 9. Appendices ........................................................................................................ 245 APPENDIX A: References .................................................................................... 245 APPENDIX B: FEMA Local Mitigation Review Tool .............................................. 245 APPENDIX C: Meetings and Support Documents ................................................ 245 APPENDIX D: Municipal Flood Maps .................................................................. 245 APPENDIX E: Critical and Special Needs Facilities ............................................. 245 APPENDIX F:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology and Ground-Water Quality of Northern Bucks County, Pennsylvania
    HYDROGEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER QUALITY OF NORTHERN BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA by Ronald A. Sloto and Curtis L Schreftier ' U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4109 Prepared in cooperation with NEW HOPE BOROUGH AND BRIDGETON, BUCKINGHAM, NOCKAMIXON, PLUMSTEAD, SOLEBURY, SPRINGFIELD, TINICUM, AND WRIGHTSTOWN TOWNSHIPS Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Chief Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, MS 517 840 Market Street Denver Federal Center Lemoyne, Pennsylvania 17043-1586 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract....................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................2 Purpose and scope ..................................................................... 2 Location and physiography ............................................................. 2 Climate...............................................................................3 Well-numbering system................................................................. 4 Borehole geophysical logging............................................................4 Previous investigations ................................................................. 6 Acknowledgments....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (2) Agency Number: Identigcationnumber
    (1) Agency: Department of Enviroiimental Protection (2) Agency Number: IdentiGcationNumber: #7- 436 IRRC Number: 2"1"1! (3) Short Title: Stream Redesignations, Blue Eye Run, et al. (Water Quality Network (WQN) Package) (4) PA Code Cite: 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 93 (5) Agency Contacts (List Telephone Number, Address, Fax Number and Email Address): Primary Contact: Michele Tate; 717-783-8727; RCSOB, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17105; mtate(a),state.pa. us Secondary Contact: Kelly Heffner; 717-783-8727; RCSOB, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17105; kheffner(a)state.pa.us (6) Primary Contact for Public Comments (List Telephone Number, Address, Fax Number and Email Address) - Complete if different from #5: Environmental Quality Board, P.O. Box 8477, Harrisburg, PA 17105 Express Mail: Environmental Quality Board, Rachel Carson State Office Building, 16th Floor, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101-2301 Email: [email protected] (All Comments will appear on IRRC'S website) (7) Type of Rulemaking (check applicable box): EZf Proposed Regulation • Final Regulation Q Final Omitted Regulation Q Emergency Certification Regulation; O Certification by the Governor Q Certification by the Attorney General (8) Briefly explain the regulation in clear and nontechnical language. (100 words or less) This proposal modifies Chapter 93 to reflect the recommended redesignation of streams shown on the attached list. The changes include streams being considered for redesignation as Exceptional Value (EV) Waters. The changes provide the appropriate designated use for these streams to protect existing uses. These changes may, upon implementation, result in more stringent treatment requirements for new and/or expanded wastewater discharges to the streams in order to protect the existing and designated water uses.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean
    HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean The High Allegheny Plan is a first iteration, a scientific assessment of the ecoregion. As part of the planning process, other aspects of the plan will be developed in future iterations, along with updates to the ecological assessment itself. These include fuller evaluations of threats to the ecoregion, constraints on conservation activities, and implementation strategies. CSS is now developing a standard template for ecoregional plans, which we have applied to the HAL first iteration draft report, distributed in 2002. Some of the HAL results have been edited or updated for this version. Click on the navigation pane to browse the report sections. What is the purpose of the report template? The purpose of creating a standard template for ecoregional plans in the Northeast is twofold: — to compile concise descriptions of methodologies developed and used for ecoregional assessment in the Northeast. These descriptions are meant to meet the needs of planning team members who need authoritative text to include in future plan documents, of science staff who need to respond to questions of methodology, and of program and state directors looking for material for general audience publications. — to create a modular resource whose pieces can be selected, incorporated in various formats, linked to in other documents, and updated easily. How does the template work? Methods are separated from results in this format, and the bulk of our work has gone into the standard methods sections. We have tried to make each methods section stand alone. Every section includes its own citation on the first page.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower New England /Northern Piedmont Terrestrial Community
    Map 2: Terrestrial Community Subregions LAMOILLE FRANKLIN CHITTENDEN OXFORD ST LAWRENCE St Lawrence CALEDONIA Ecoregion Lower New England /Northern Piedmont WASHINGTON Northern Appalachian JEFFERSON Ecoregion MAINE Terrestrial Community Subregions ESSEX ORANGE GRAFTON ADDISON CARROLL CUMBERLAND LEWIS M212Bb 20 0 20 40 Kilometers HAMILTON 221Al RUTLAND WARREN WINDSOR M212Bc BELKNAP 10 0 10 20 30 40 Miles NEW YORK HERKIMER VERMONT OSWEGO SULLIVAN HAMPSHIRE MERRIMACK STRAFFORD WASHINGTON ONROE WAYNE ONEIDA FULTON CAYUGA SARATOGA ONONDAGA BENNINGTON Great Lakes ROCKINGHAM WINDHAM ONTARIO Ecoregion MADISON HILLSBOROUGH MONTGOMERY RENSSELAER SCHENECTADY CHESHIRE SENECA ON ESSEX YATES OTSEGO 221Ai CORTLAND 221Bc M212Cc M212Bd ALBANY SCHOHARIE FRANKLIN MIDDLESEX BERKSHIRE TOMPKINS CHENANGO SCHUYLER 221Bb WORCESTER STEUBEN M212Cb HAMPSHIRE SUFFOLK NEW YORK GREENE MASSACHUSETTS COLUMBIA NORFOLK CHEMUNG TIOGA DELAWARE 221Ah BROOME HAMPDEN High Allegheny Plateau 221Af BRISTOL PLYMOUTH PROVIDENCE Ecoregion ULSTER WINDHAM North Atlantic Coast SUSQUEHANNA TOLLAND TIOGA BRADFORD RHODE LITCHFIELD Ecoregion BAR DUTCHESS HARTFORD 221Ag ISLAND BRISTOL SULLIVAN PENNSYLVANIA KENT WAYNE CONNECTICUT NEWPORT 221Ae WYOMING 221Ba NEW HAVEN NEW LONDON WASHINGTON SULLIVAN MIDDLESEX DUKES LACKAWANNA PUTNAM ORANGE FAIRFIELD LYCOMING TON PIKE LUZERNE ROCKLAND SUSSEX WESTCHESTER MONTOUR PASSAIC COLUMBIA MONROE UNION Central Appalachian BERGEN WARREN CARBON MORRIS Ecoregion 221Dc BRONX SUFFOLK SNYDER ESSEX SCHUYLKILL NEW YORK NASSAU NORTHUMBERLAND NORTHAMPTON HUDSON 221Am
    [Show full text]
  • FIGURE 4 Map Showing Physiographic Provinces and Sections of the Eastern United States (From Fenneman 1938)
    nagement of Central Hardwood Forests The Central Hardwood Region 7 PHYSIOGRAPHY ardwood region is situated in an area that, in the main part, is th the Appalachian system and, except for the northwestern rglaciated (Fig. 4). The primary physiographic regions of the oods are the Blue Ridge, Ridge and Valley, Appalachian Plateaus, md, Ozark Plateau, and Ouachita provinces (Fenneman 1938). Ridge is the easternmost province in the central hardwood region 1 the south in northern Georgia and extends into southeastern Through Virginia, the Blue Ridge narrows to form a prominent the name "Blue Ridge." The highest elevations in the eastern occur in the Blue Ridge section of western North Carolina. Mount le Black Mountains just northeast of Asheville rises to a height of ~ sea level and, like many of the tallest peaks in the Appalachians, rith a relic spruce-fir forest. tely north and west of the Blue Ridge is the Ridge and Valley xtends from central Pennsylvania in the north to northern Georgia . The Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Missouri pographically to the Ridge and ValleyProvince, and several authors I I I o 125 250 :hey are part of a common feature, part of which is buried in 11 500 miles bama and Mississippi (King 1950; Petersen et al. 1980; Hubler ITI2TI CENTRAL HARDWOOD REGION dge and Valley section is very old and geologically complex, having I faulted, folded, and eroded. The ridges are long and narrow with ..-.~/ s through Pennsylvania, western Maryland, and West Virginia (Fig. /_. } iden southward to form the valley of the Shenandoah in Virginia essee farther south.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Catchable-Trout Stocking Program Changes by Tom Greene
    2002 Catchable-Trout Stocking Program Changes by Tom Greene photo-Art Michaels Beginning this season, the Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Com- As with past practice, changes for the 2002 season will mission will produce approximately 3.8 million adult trout include the addition of new water areas, some expansions to for distribution in the waters of the Commonwealth. In currently stocked waters, and the removal of several waters comparison with past practice, this figure represents a reduc- from the stocking program. tion of about 1.4 million trout from the 5.2 million or so stocked in 2001. New waters Pennsylvania’s state fish culture stations are currently For the 2002 season, new-water additions consist of three faced with challenges related to both water quantity and water previously stocked waters that return to the stocking program quality. To take prompt action to address these issues, it was as a result of completed dam maintenance repair and a necessary at least temporarily to reduce the number of adult landowner agreement to provide public angling. trout produced in our state hatcheries and stocked in state Cloe Lake, Jefferson County. Following a two-year waters open to free public fishing. period of drawdown for dam maintenance and repairs, this As part of this change, Commis- 25.5-acre lake is expected to be avail- sion fisheries managers have worked able for trout angling for the 2002 closely with law enforcement and season. If the water levels are re- other staff to develop a plan to real- stored according to schedule, the locate the stocking of hatchery trout lake will receive a preseason and an for the 2002 season and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Significance of the Deformation History Within the Hinge Zone of the Pennsylvania Salient, Appalachian Mountains
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Faculty Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2014 Significance of the Deformation History within the Hinge Zone of the Pennsylvania Salient, Appalachian Mountains Mary Beth Gray Bucknell University, [email protected] Peter B. Sak [email protected] Zeshan Ismat Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_journ Part of the Tectonics and Structure Commons Recommended Citation Sak, P.B., Gray, M.B., and Ismat, Z., 2014, Significance of the Juniata culmination in the deformation history of the Pennsylvania salient, Appalachian Mountains. Journal of Geology 122, 367-380 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Significance of the Deformation History within the Hinge Zone of the Pennsylvania Salient, Appalachian Mountains Peter B. Sak,1,* Mary Beth Gray,2 and Zeshan Ismat3 1. Department of Earth Sciences, Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013, USA; 2. Department of Geology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 17837, USA; 3. Department of Earth and Environment, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603, USA ABSTRACT Two competing models exist for the formation of the Pennsylvania salient, a widely studied area of pronounced curvature in the Appalachian mountain belt. The viability of these models can be tested by compiling and analyzing the patterns of structures within the general hinge zone of the Pennsylvania salient. One end-member model suggests a NW-directed maximum shortening direction and no rotation through time in the culmination.
    [Show full text]
  • September 14, 2013 (Pages 5439-5578)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 43 (2013) Repository 9-14-2013 September 14, 2013 (Pages 5439-5578) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2013 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "September 14, 2013 (Pages 5439-5578)" (2013). Volume 43 (2013). 37. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2013/37 This September is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 43 (2013) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 43 Number 37 Saturday, September 14, 2013 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 5439—5578 Agencies in this issue The Courts Department of Banking and Securities Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of Health Department of Public Welfare Department of Revenue Department of State Environmental Hearing Board Environmental Quality Board Fish and Boat Commission Insurance Department Pennsylvania Alzheimer’s Disease Planning Committee Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology Detailed list of contents appears inside. Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporters (Master Transmittal Sheets): No. 466, September 2013 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- BULLETIN reau, 641 Main Capitol Building, Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, (ISSN 0162-2137) under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publi- cation and effectiveness of Commonwealth Documents).
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna River Management Plan
    SUSQUEHANNA RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN A management plan focusing on the large river habitats of the West Branch Susquehanna and Susquehanna rivers of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Bureau of Fisheries Division of Fisheries Management 1601 Elmerton Avenue P.O. Box 67000 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... .ii List of Appendix A Tables ...........................................................................................................iii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... viii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................ix 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 2.0 River Basin Features .......................................................................................................5 3.0 River Characteristics ..................................................................................................... 22 4.0 Special Jurisdictions .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]