Life Itself’: a Socio-Historic Examination of FINRRAGE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by White Rose E-theses Online From ‘Death of the Female’ to ‘Life Itself’: A Socio-Historic Examination of FINRRAGE Stevienna Marie de Saille Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Leeds School of Sociology and Social Policy September 2012 ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2012, The University of Leeds and Stevienna Marie de Saille The right of Stevienna Marie de Saille to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are a number of people who made this thesis possible in a number of different, fantastically important ways. My deepest thanks to: - My supervisors, Prof. Anne Kerr and Dr. Paul Bagguley, for their patience, advice, editorial comments, and the occasional kickstart when the project seemed just a little(!) overwhelming, and my examiners, Prof. Maureen McNeil and Dr. Angharad Beckett for their insight and suggestions. - The School of Sociology and Social Policy, for awarding me the teaching bursary which made this possible, and all the wonderful faculty and support staff who made it an excellent experience. - The archivists in Special Collections at the University of Leeds, and to the volunteers at the Feminist Archive North for giving me an all-access pass. - The women of FINRRAGE, for their generosity, hospitality, and for being alternately a twenty-four person thesis committee and cheering squad. - The Worldwide Universities Network for awarding me the Research Mobility Grant which allowed me to carry out fieldwork while studying bioethics at the University of Sydney, and Anoushka for all her help in achieving the grant. Many more thanks to Dr. Catherine Mills and to Lindy Gaze for making sure I had a home at VELiM, and to Prof. Catherine Waldby for taking me on as a temporary supervisee. - The Postgraduate Forum in Genetics and Society for leading me into STS, and especially to Rachel Douglas-Jones for sticking it out till the end. - Sally Hines, Zowie Davy and Maria do Mar Pereira for reminding me why I am still a feminist. - The many other people who, unwittingly or not, gave me books, papers and ideas which nudged my thinking in completely unexpected directions: Fiona Philip and Penny Rivkin, Bice Maiguashca, Prof. Donna Dickenson and the members of the IAS/WUN Biopolitics Symposium, Olivia Harvey, Catherine Carroll, Nicola Marks, Melinda Cooper, LeeAnn and Stuart Mawler, and Linzi, Sam, Leon, Gen, Cassandra, Angelica and the rest of 14th floor postgraduate posse. - And last but not remotely least, to Imona Haninger for putting up with the madwoman in the attic; to Noemie Bouhana for invaluable academic advice in between marathon bouts of critters, zombies, and things that go boom in the night; and to all my friends and family in the US, UK, Germany and Czech Republic, who accepted being ignored for months (years!) on end with grace and affirmations of confidence. I hope to make it up to all of you soon… iv ABSTRACT Although questions about the production of knowledge are finally beginning to be asked within social movements studies, these tend to rely on a very vague definition of 'knowledge', obscuring activists' engagement with informal and formal research, as well as social forms of knowledge. This thesis employs an analytic framework in which social movements are theorised as producing a distinctive cognitive praxis, in order to examine the ways in which movements emerge, develop, and operationalise their knowledge in pursuit of their goals. In order to do this, I will create a contextualised case study of the Feminist International Network of Resistance to Reproductive and Genetic Engineering (FINRRAGE), examining the ways it sought to develop a knowledge project around new reproductive technologies and present itself as a network of credible knowers. Beginning as a reaction to a 1984 conference panel on new reproductive technology entitled 'Death of the Female', in its strongest phase (1984-1997) FINRRAGE comprised over a thousand women in thirty-seven countries. Although identified as an instance of radical opposition, its strategy relied upon knowledge generation, rather than protest. Employing a textual analysis of archival documents, published writings and lifecourse interviews with an international selection of twenty-four women, the thesis explores the processes by which the network pursued a project of creating an evidence-based position of resistance to the development of reproductive and genetic technologies through empirical research, publication, and continuous negotiation between women from very different social contexts. As such, the study also provides an opportunity to (re)consider feminist engagement with a specific area of technology over an historical period. It is hoped that the result will be a contribution to the academic literature on the development of collective knowledge and expertise for both social movements theory and science and technology studies, as well as to feminist history and theory. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................... VIII INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 Background to the work.............................................................................................1 Choice of this case................................................................................................................ 3 Aims and Structure of the Thesis ..............................................................................4 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW.............................................................. 6 A brief history of social movements theory ..............................................................7 Resource mobilisation – reinscribing 'rational' .................................................................... 8 New Social Movements – European perspectives ............................................................... 9 The knowledge turn in SMT .............................................................................................. 11 Knowledge as process: cognitive praxis........................................................................ 12 Frames as organisers of meaning.................................................................................. 13 Oppositional and other forms of 'raised' consciousness................................................ 15 STS through a social movements lens .....................................................................20 'Lay' knowledge as a form of expertise .............................................................................. 24 Expertise beyond the binary of 'expert' and 'lay' ................................................................ 27 Conclusion..................................................................................................................31 CHAPTER 3 – METHODOLOGY ................................................................... 33 PART I: Devising the approach...............................................................................33 Methodological considerations for feminist research......................................................... 35 Empowerment ................................................................................................................ 35 Reflexivity....................................................................................................................... 37 Objectivity...................................................................................................................... 38 Methodological innovation ............................................................................................ 39 PART II: Constructing the case ..............................................................................40 Gathering the data ..............................................................................................................41 Macro - The external context......................................................................................... 42 Meso – internal documents of the network .................................................................... 42 Micro -- Interviews with members ................................................................................. 43 Analysis.............................................................................................................................. 45 The history of FINRRAGE ............................................................................................. 45 The women of FINRRAGE............................................................................................. 46 Expert Roles in FINRRAGE........................................................................................... 49 Methodological reflections........................................................................................50 Conclusion..................................................................................................................51 CHAPTER 4