DOCSLIB.ORG

Freedom of the Press

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freedom of the Press Malaysia Page 1 of 4 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Malaysia Malaysia Country: Malaysia Year: 2016 Press Freedom Status: Not Free PFS Score: 67 Legal Environment: 26 Political Environment: 24 Economic Environment: 17 Overview In 2015, the government of Prime Minister Najib Razak utilized its powers under the Sedition Act to arrest and charge critical journalists, especially those that called for an explanation of a corruption scandal involving the state investment vehicle 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). Some journalists received threats or were physically attacked by members of the public during the year. Key Developments • Journalists were among dozens of government critics arrested in 2015 under the colonial-era Sedition Act, which the Federal Court upheld as constitutional in October. • Reporting on the alleged misuse of the 1MDB state investment fund sparked criminal defamation proceedings against at least four news outlets, and two others were temporarily suspended. • In July, the government blocked the London-based Sarawak Report news website for extensive reporting on the 1MDB scandal, reneging on a previous pledge that it would not censor the internet. https://freedomhouse.org/print/48377 12/5/2016 Malaysia Page 2 of 4 • Three Chinese reporters were attacked by members of the public while covering a riot at a shopping center, and a radio journalist received violent threats on social media after publishing a satirical video about efforts to implement the Islamic criminal code in Kelantan state. Legal Environment: 26 / 30 (↓1) Article 10 of the constitution guarantees freedom of expression, but it also allows for a host of limitations on this right. The 1948 Sedition Act and harsh criminal defamation laws are regularly used to impose restrictions on the press and other critics of the government. A litany of arrests under the Sedition Act began in January 2015, when police detained human rights lawyer Eric Paulsen for a Twitter post in which he criticized a federal agency managing Islamic affairs. In February, the Federal Court upheld opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s 2014 conviction and five-year prison sentence for sodomy, and a government crackdown on the political opposition escalated, encompassing journalists and political commentators. In March 2015, three editors from the online news portal the Malaysian Insider were arrested under the Sedition Act, reportedly because a council of state governors and sultans, the Conference of Rulers, disputed one of their reports; the outlet was known for its reporting on the 1MDB scandal. In April, the High Court in Kuala Lumpur charged political cartoonist Zulkiflee Anwar Haque, known as Zunar, for implying in comments posted on Twitter that political pressure on judges had produced Anwar Ibrahim’s conviction. Zunar faces 9 charges under the act, up to 43 years in prison, and a considerable fine. In October, the Federal Court ruled that the Sedition Act is constitutional, responding to a challenge by Azmi Sharom, a law professor charged with sedition in 2014 for comments he made to the Malay Mail Online regarding a political crisis in the state of Selangor. Amendments to the Sedition Act were approved in April 2015, but had yet to take effect at the year’s end because they had not been officially published. Under the amendments, the act no longer defines criticism of the judiciary or the government as seditious. However, they also codified greater penalties for violation of the act, raising the possible jail term for general sedition to 7 years from the previous 3; moreover, it codified a penalty of 20 years’ imprisonment for seditions actions that involve property destruction or physical harm to a person, and contained provisions that would permit the government to order the removal from websites of material deemed seditious, and to ban those deemed of propagating such material from accessing electronic devices. Investigative news reports that linked the unfolding corruption scandal involving 1MDB to Prime Minister Najib in 2015 prompted several defamation charges. Najib sued two opposition-aligned news portals for reporting on the fund, naming the editor and managing director of Harakah Daily in one complaint, and the owner of Media Rakyat along with an opposition lawmaker in another. The prime minister’s lawyers also told local journalists they were exploring avenues to sue the Wall Street Journal, which reported in July that Malaysian investigators had traced $700 million from 1MDB to Najib’s personal bank accounts. In November, the government raided the offices of online news portals Malaysiakini and the Star Online. The events came after the attorney general’s chambers filed a defamation complaint in response to articles they had published about the reassignment of a deputy prosecutor in the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. A https://freedomhouse.org/print/48377 12/5/2016 Malaysia Page 3 of 4 defamation case that Najib initiated in 2014 against Malaysiakini and two of its editors over critical comments by readers in the portal’s “Your Say” column is ongoing. Although the opposition-controlled states of Selangor and Penang passed freedom of information laws in 2011, Malaysia has no federal law with such guarantees, and officials remain reluctant to share even innocuous information with journalists—including the content of proposed legislation—for fear of being charged under the Official Secrets Act. The Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA) gives the communications and multimedia minister a large measure of discretionary authority over broadcast licenses. The ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition reviewed existing media licensing and censorship laws in 2012, and a resulting amendment to the 1984 Printing Presses and Publications Act (PPPA) repealed a provision that had required all publishers and printing firms to obtain an annual operating permit. However, the revision left all other restrictions in place, including the government’s authority to grant or deny license applications and to revoke the required licenses at any time without judicial review. The Home Affairs Ministry may also issue “show cause” letters, which require newspapers to explain certain articles or face suspension or revocation of their permits. In July 2015, the Home Ministry suspended permits for news publications the Edge Weekly and the Edge Financial Daily for three months, saying that their reporting on the 1MDB fund had prejudiced public order. The High Court overturned the suspensions in September. Political Environment: 24 / 40 (↓1) State outlets tend to reflect government views. While the Malaysian government is formally committed to a policy of refraining from direct online censorship through Section 3 (3) of the CMA and the Multimedia Bill of Guarantees, authorities blocked a number of websites in 2015. In July, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) blocked the website of the London-based Sarawak Report, which had reported extensively on the 1MDB allegations; it remained inaccessible in Malaysia at the year’s end. The Commission also threatened to block websites covering the Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih), which held a peaceful, 34-hour anticorruption rally in August. The Malaysia Chronicle, an online news aggregator, was apparently blocked in October. The MCMC did not confirm the block, but visitors to the site were informed it was “not available in Malaysia as it violates the national law(s).” It too remained inaccessible in Malaysia at the year’s end. Foreign print media are occasionally censored or banned. Self-censorship is common due to the legal and economic environments. Physical harassment and intimidation are usually less of a danger for journalists than arbitrary arrest or threats of legal action, though incidents are occasionally reported. In March 2015, Aisyah Tajuddin, a journalist with BFM Radio, received violent threats from members of the public on social media after she produced a satirical video questioning political efforts to implement the Islamic criminal code in Kelantan state. In July, two photographers and a reporter from separate Chinese news organizations were assaulted by members of the public while covering a riot at a shopping plaza in Kuala Lumpur. Government officials, including Prime Minister Najib, tried to use details of the incident to justify calls for stricter regulation of social media, an idea that was greeted with dismay by media freedom advocates. https://freedomhouse.org/print/48377 12/5/2016 Malaysia Page 4 of 4 Economic Environment: 17 / 30 Although the media industry is dominated by private owners, the majority of print and broadcast outlets are controlled either by political parties in the ruling coalition or by businesses with political connections to the government. The largest media conglomerate, Media Prima, owns half of the Malay and English-language newspapers, as well as many television channels; it is believed to be closely linked to the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), the leading party of the BN. Huaren Management, which is associated with another BN member, the Malaysian Chinese Association, monopolizes Chinese-language newspapers. Despite the BN’s insistence that mainstream newspapers are impartial, the owners’ political and business interests often lead to self-censorship by journalists. With around 71 percent of the population accessing the internet in 2015, Malaysia is home to many news websites and blogs that offer competing points of view. Although not all internet news organizations are politically independent—many have suspected affiliations with politicians from either the opposition or the ruling coalition—they offer an array of political opinions that cannot be found in the traditional media. Social-networking sites such as Facebook flourished in 2015, hosting vigorous debates on political issues and government policies. The internet continues to be the place to challenge corruption and raise human rights concerns, although existing laws require bloggers to tread carefully. Source URL: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2016/malaysia https://freedomhouse.org/print/48377 12/5/2016.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Constitution of Malaysia
    LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT FEDERAL CONSTITUTION Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006 Laws of Malaysia FEDERAL CONSTITUTION First introduced as the Constitution … 31 August 1957 of the Federation of Malaya on Merdeka Day Subsequently introduced as the … … 16 September 1963 Constitution of Malaysia on Malaysia Day PREVIOUS REPRINTS First Reprint … … … … … 1958 Second Reprint … … … … … 1962 Third Reprint … … … … … 1964 Fourth Reprint … … … … … 1968 Fifth Reprint … … … … … 1970 Sixth Reprint … … … … … 1977 Seventh Reprint … … … … … 1978 Eighth Reprint … … … … … 1982 Ninth Reprint … … … … … 1988 Tenth Reprint … … … … … 1992 Eleventh Reprint … … … … … 1994 Twelfth Reprint … … … … … 1997 Thirteenth Reprint … … … … … 2002 Fourteenth Reprint … … … … … 2003 Fifteenth Reprint … … … … … 2006 Federal Constitution CONTENTS PAGE ARRANGEMENT OF ARTICLES 3–15 CONSTITUTION 17–208 LIST OF AMENDMENTS 209–211 LIST OF ARTICLES AMENDED 212–229 4 Laws of Malaysia FEDERAL CONSTITUTION NOTE: The Notes in small print on unnumbered pages are not part of the authoritative text. They are intended to assist the reader by setting out the chronology of the major amendments to the Federal Constitution and for editorial reasons, are set out in the present format. Federal Constitution 3 LAWS OF MALAYSIA FEDERAL CONSTITUTION ARRANGEMENT OF ARTICLES PART I THE STATES, RELIGION AND LAW OF THE FEDERATION Article 1. Name, States and territories of the Federation 2. Admission of new territories into the Federation 3. Religion of the Federation 4. Supreme Law of the Federation PART II FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES 5. Liberty of the person 6. Slavery and forced labour prohibited 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-The-Truth-About-Sarawaks-Forest
    8/28/2020 The Truth About Sarawak's 'Forest Cover' - Why Shell Should Think Twice Before Engaging With The Timber Crooks | Sarawak Report Secure Key Contact instructions Donate to Sarawak Report Facebook Twitter Sarawak Report Latest Stories Sections Birds Of A Feather Flock Together? "I Am Alright Jack" AKA Najib Razak? Coup Coalition's 1MDB Cover-Up Continues As Talks Confirmed With IPIC GOLF DIPLOMACY AND "BACK-CHANNEL LOBBYING" - US$8 Million To Lobby President Trump, But Najib's Golf Got Cancelled! The Hawaii Connection - How Jho Low Secretly Lobbied Trump For Najib Over 1MDB! 'Back To Normal' With The Same Tired Tricksters And Their Same Old Playbook - Of Sex, Lies and Videotape Stories Talkbacks Campaign Platform Speaker's Corner Press About Sarawak Report Tweet https://www.sarawakreport.org/2019/06/the-truth-about-sarawaks-forest-cover-why-shell-should-think-before-engaging-with-the-timber-crooks/ 1/5 8/28/2020 The Truth About Sarawak's 'Forest Cover' - Why Shell Should Think Twice Before Engaging With The Timber Crooks | Sarawak Report The Truth About Sarawak's 'Forest Cover' - Why Shell Should Think Twice Before Engaging With The Timber Crooks 16 June 2019 Looking for all the world like a gruesome bunch of mafia dons, the head honchos of Sarawak dressed casual this weekend and waddled out to some turf to grin for their favourite PR organ, the Borneo Post (owned by the timber barons of KTS) in order to proclaim their belated attempt to get onto the tree planting band-waggon. The broad face of the mysteriously wealthy deputy chief minister, Awang Tengah dominated the shot (his earlier positions included chairman and director of the Sarawak Timber Industry Development Corporation and minister of Urban Development and Natural Resources).
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia, September 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Malaysia, September 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: MALAYSIA September 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Malaysia. Short Form: Malaysia. Term for Citizen(s): Malaysian(s). Capital: Since 1999 Putrajaya (25 kilometers south of Kuala Lumpur) Click to Enlarge Image has been the administrative capital and seat of government. Parliament still meets in Kuala Lumpur, but most ministries are located in Putrajaya. Major Cities: Kuala Lumpur is the only city with a population greater than 1 million persons (1,305,792 according to the most recent census in 2000). Other major cities include Johor Bahru (642,944), Ipoh (536,832), and Klang (626,699). Independence: Peninsular Malaysia attained independence as the Federation of Malaya on August 31, 1957. Later, two states on the island of Borneo—Sabah and Sarawak—joined the federation to form Malaysia on September 16, 1963. Public Holidays: Many public holidays are observed only in particular states, and the dates of Hindu and Islamic holidays vary because they are based on lunar calendars. The following holidays are observed nationwide: Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date); Chinese New Year (movable set of three days in January and February); Muharram (Islamic New Year, movable date); Mouloud (Prophet Muhammad’s Birthday, movable date); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (movable date in May); Official Birthday of His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (June 5); National Day (August 31); Deepavali (Diwali, movable set of five days in October and November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date); and Christmas Day (December 25). Flag: Fourteen alternating red and white horizontal stripes of equal width, representing equal membership in the Federation of Malaysia, which is composed of 13 states and the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Constitution of 1957 with Amendments Through 2007
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 constituteproject.org Malaysia's Constitution of 1957 with Amendments through 2007 Subsequently amended This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 Table of contents PART I: THE STATES, RELIGION AND LAW OF THE FEDERATION . 12 1. Name, States and territories of the Federation . 12 2. Admission of new territories into the Federation . 12 3. Religion of the Federation . 12 4. Supreme law of the Federation . 13 PART II: FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES . 13 5. Liberty of the person . 13 6. Slavery and forced labour prohibited . 14 7. Protection against retrospective criminal laws and repeated trials . 14 8. Equality . 14 9. Prohibition of banishment and freedom of movement . 15 10. Freedom of speech, assembly and association . 15 11. Freedom of religion . 16 12. Rights in respect of education . 17 13. Rights to property . 17 PART III: CITIZENSHIP . 17 Chapter 1: Acquisition of Citizenship . 17 14. Citizenship by operation of law . 17 15. Citizenship by registration (wives and children of citizens) . 18 15A. Special power to register children . 18 16. Citizenship by registration (persons born in the Federation before Merdeka Day) . 19 16A. Citizenship by registration (persons resident in States of Sabah and Sarawak on Malaysia Day) . 19 17. Repealed . 19 18. General provisions as to registration . 19 19. Citizenship by naturalisation . 20 19A. Repealed . 21 20. Repealed . 21 21. Repealed . 21 22. Citizenship by incorporation of territory . 21 Chapter 2: Termination of Citizenship .
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Page 1 of 3
    Singapore Page 1 of 3 Singapore International Religious Freedom Report 2008 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, other laws and policies restricted this right in some circumstances. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the Government during the period covered by this report. The Government does not tolerate speech or actions that it deems could adversely affect racial or religious harmony. There were no reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 270 square miles and a population of 4.8 million, of whom 3.6 million are citizens or permanent residents. According to the 2000 census, 85 percent of citizens and permanent residents profess a religion. Of this group, 51 percent practice Buddhism, Taoism, ancestor veneration, or other religious practice traditionally associated with the ethnic Chinese population. Approximately 15 percent of the population is Muslim, 15 percent Christian, and 4 percent Hindu. The remainder is composed of adherents of other religious groups, including small Sikh, Jewish, Zoroastrian, and Jain communities. Among Christians, the majority of whom are ethnic Chinese, 33 percent are Roman Catholic and 67 percent are Protestant. The remaining 15 percent of the population does not profess a religious faith. Approximately 77 percent of the population is ethnic Chinese, 14 percent ethnic Malay, and 8 percent ethnic Indian.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Role of Malaysia's Royalty
    www.rsis.edu.sg No. 107 – 12 July 2021 RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Mr Yang Razali Kassim, Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected]. The Evolving Role of Malaysia’s Royalty By Piya Sukhani SYNOPSIS As Malaysia’s political instability continues, the royalty will take on an increasingly influential position in the country’s politics and governance. COMMENTARY PRIME MINISTER Muhyiddin Yassin has agreed to reopen the country’s suspended parliament for a five-day sitting from 26 July 2021. This comes after the Malaysian King called on 16 June for parliament to be reconvened as soon as possible. This was a contradiction of Muhyiddin’s previously proposed timeline for reopening the House by September at the earliest. The rulers have held a largely symbolic position since Malaysia’s Independence, but their role in national politics has become increasingly prominent and critical, particularly since 2020, when political fragmentation reached the point where no coalition had a clear and substantive parliamentary majority. Royalty in Politics Following Mahathir Mohamad’s abrupt resignation as premier in February 2020, King Sultan Abdullah took centre stage in seeking to resolve a week-long impasse by interviewing each of Malaysia’s 222 Members of Parliament (MPs) to determine who enjoyed a majority in parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taib Timber Mafia
    The Taib Timber Mafia Facts and Figures on Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) from Sarawak, Malaysia 20 September 2012 Bruno Manser Fund - The Taib Timber Mafia Contents Sarawak, an environmental crime hotspot ................................................................................. 4 1. The “Stop Timber Corruption” Campaign ............................................................................... 5 2. The aim of this report .............................................................................................................. 5 3. Sources used for this report .................................................................................................... 6 4. Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 6 5. What is a “PEP”? ....................................................................................................................... 7 6. Specific due diligence requirements for financial service providers when dealing with PEPs ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 7. The Taib Family ....................................................................................................................... 9 8. Taib’s modus operandi ............................................................................................................ 9 9. Portraits of individual Taib family members ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CV Caryn Koh Rev 3.0 (2020)
    Caryn Koh (formal name: Koh Hooi San) Born: 1987 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Diploma in Fine Art, Dasein Art Academy, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Caryn Koh is a qualified medical doctor who who left medicine to rediscover her passion in the visual arts. She has since obtained her Diploma in Fine Arts from Dasein Art Academy, and is part of the loose collective Titikmerah, based in Publika, Kuala Lumpur. She currently resides in the U.K. Caryn is intrigued by the human mould, the physique as well as the emotional and psychological make-up of individuals. Within this construct, she believes the various human interconnections, be they by blood or otherwise, creates another dynamic to our being. She is most well-known for her Sekolah (School) Series of illustrations in pen and color pencil, the national school uniform a metaphor for the limitations set upon us by others. These have been drawn in various situations based on Caryn’s own personal experiences, or thoughts at the moment on current affairs that resonate with her. In terms of artwork mediums and formats, Caryn is one who isn’t afraid to experiment. Her body of work up to now has covered various forms, from drawings to large scale murals, installations, audio and video-based art. Awards 2020 Cancer Research Malaysia Mask Design Winner Psychology In Seattle Artist Grant 2020 2018 Shortlist, The Derwent Art Prize, United Kingdom 2017 Outstanding Achievement Award in Fine Art, Dasein Art Academy Shortlist, UOB Painting of the Year Award, Emerging Artist 2016 2nd Place, Tanjong Heritage Competition (Printmaking) Shortlisted, Nando’s Art Initiative 2016 – “Your Art, Your Story” Solo Exhibitions 2020 Within These Walls, Mams Gallery, Swindon, United Kingdom 2019 Bonds, Titikmerah Collective, TTDI, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2018 as deep as I could remember, as far as I could see, Artemis Art, Publika, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Artemis Corporation Sdn Bhd (848708-W) Lot 21 & 22 Level G4 Publika@Dutamas, Block C5 Solaris Dutamas, No.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Scandal: Exploring Malaysia's 2018 General Elections and the Case for Sovereign Wealth Funds
    Seattle Pacific University Digital Commons @ SPU Honors Projects University Scholars Spring 6-7-2021 The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Scandal: Exploring Malaysia's 2018 General Elections and the Case for Sovereign Wealth Funds Chea-Mun Tan Seattle Pacific University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Economics Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Tan, Chea-Mun, "The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Scandal: Exploring Malaysia's 2018 General Elections and the Case for Sovereign Wealth Funds" (2021). Honors Projects. 131. https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/honorsprojects/131 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the University Scholars at Digital Commons @ SPU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ SPU. The 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Scandal: Exploring Malaysia’s 2018 General Elections and the Case for Sovereign Wealth Funds by Chea-Mun Tan First Reader, Dr. Doug Downing Second Reader, Dr. Hau Nguyen A project submitted in partial fulfillMent of the requireMents of the University Scholars Honors Project Seattle Pacific University 2021 Tan 2 Abstract In 2015, the former PriMe Minister of Malaysia, Najib Razak, was accused of corruption, eMbezzleMent, and fraud of over $700 million USD. Low Taek Jho, the former financier of Malaysia, was also accused and dubbed the ‘mastermind’ of the 1MDB scandal. As one of the world’s largest financial scandals, this paper seeks to explore the political and economic iMplications of 1MDB through historical context and a critical assessMent of governance. Specifically, it will exaMine the economic and political agendas of former PriMe Ministers Najib Razak and Mahathir MohaMad.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    Columbia Jurisprudence Conference Jurisprudence & Freedom of Expression in Malaysia By HR Dipendra OVERVIEW 2015 IN A NUTSHELL: 2015 has been inundated with a deluge of administrative clamp downs to the constitutional right of freedom of expression in Malaysia. Innocuous solecism and mordant comic strips were the subject of criminal prosecution. A number of activists, lawyers, editors, and students were arrested, remanded and/or prosecuted for expressing their opinions over Twitter, articles, and through cartoons. The Home Minister had issued a total of 28 Printing Presses and Publications (Control of Undesirable Publications) Orders in the same year banning the circulation of a total of 47 books, amongst others, 3 books by the cartoonist, Zunar as well as “Any yellow coloured clothing and which contains the words ‘Bersih 4’” and “Any other printed material and pamphlets which leads to Bersih 4 Rally”. Suspension orders were issued to two publications under the wing of The Edge Media Group. On an unprecedented move, the Inspector General of Police (IGP) of Malaysia took on the role of active policing and monitoring over social media platform, in particular, on Twitter. As aptly put by Human Rights Watch's Asia deputy director, Phil Robertson, the IGP "patrols the Twittersphere like a shark in open water". On the whole, year 2015 has not only been a tough year for the Fourth Estate of the country but it has also thrown woebegone and hermetic gossamer over the freedom of expression in Malaysia. THE JURISPRUDENCE ASPECT THE PAST: The cases which touch on the right of freedom of expression revolve around offences under two pieces of legislation in particular - the Sedition Act 19481 and Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 ('PPPA').
    [Show full text]
  • Are Najib Et Al Listening to the Voice of Conscience? Malaysiakini.Com July 7, 2015 by Stephen Ng
    Are Najib et al listening to the voice of conscience? MalaysiaKini.com July 7, 2015 By Stephen Ng COMMENT Amidst strong allegations that some RM2.6 billion had been funnelled into Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak’s personal accounts in AmPrivate Bank, one thing is clearly missing. It is the God-given voice of conscience. The only person who has come close to having some conscience is Najib himself, who denied that he had “stolen” the people’s money. This is the guilty conscience at work. We say that the voice of conscience has pricked the culprit that he has to say something in order to silence his own guilty conscience. For someone accused of taking the money, one can either hear the still voice of conscience and immediately admit that he had indeed stolen the money, or he will categorically deny it. After all, no thief - even one caught red handed - would admit that he has stolen his client’s money, would he? In any case, the voice of conscience will not be silenced at all. With time, it will grow louder, and even stronger, no matter how one tries to suppress it. Najib’s denial shows that at least the voice of conscience is doing its work. Compared to someone who is simply indifferent and continues on with life as if nothing has happened, at least Najib has responded to his own voice of conscience. Strangely, some have remained absolutely silent. One would expect that at this crucial juncture in Najib’s life, Rosmah Mansor would have spoken up.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Exposure to Berita Harian Online and Utusan Malaysia Online: the Roles of Surveillance Motivation, Website Usability and Website Attractiveness
    SEARCH: The Journal of the South East Asia Research centre ISSN 2229-872X for Communications and Humanities. Vol. 6 No. 2, 2014, pp 25-45 Selective Exposure to Berita Harian Online and Utusan Malaysia Online: The Roles of Surveillance Motivation, Website Usability and Website Attractiveness Nur Azimah Zulkafli Bahiyah Omar Nor Hazlina Hashim School of Communication, Universiti Sains Malaysia © The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access by Taylor’s Press. ABSTRACT News media allows audiences to be selective in determining both their news sources and type of news stories they read. This study examined factors influencing selective exposure to the online editions of two mainstream Malaysian newspapers, Berita Harian and Utusan Malaysia. Using selective exposure theory as the theoretical lens, this study compared both newspapers in terms of their audiences’ level of surveillance motivation, and how audiences rate the newspapers’ websites with respect to usability and attractiveness. This study used a within-subject experimental research design that exposed 51 subjects to both Berita Harian and Utusan Malaysia online newspapers. The results of the experiment indicate that Berita Harian and Utusan Malaysia online were significantly different in terms of website usability; however, no significant differences were found in terms of surveillance motivation or website attractiveness between the two newspapers. Further analysis indicate that the only significant predictor of selective exposure was website usability. This study highlights the importance of website usability for online newspapers wanting to harness audience selectivity. Keywords: Selective exposure, online newspapers, surveillance motivation, website usability, website attractiveness 1. INTRODUCTION News media began to have an online presence during the mid-1990s.
    [Show full text]