DOCSLIB.ORG

Greenbushes Infrastructure Corridors Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ENVIRONMENTAL Greenbushes Infrastructure Corridors Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey Prepared for Talison Lithium 3 December 2018 Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey Greenbushes Infrastructure Corridors Document Status Rev Authors Reviewer/s Date Approved for Issue No. Name Distributed To Date 1 D.Brearley B.Menezies 03/11/18 D.Brearley S.Green, 25/11/18 C.Griffin 2 D.Brearley B.Menezies 29/11/18 D.Brearley S.Green, 03/12/18 C.Griffin ACN 095 837 120 PO Box 227 YALLINGUP WA 6282 Telephone / Fax (08) 9756 6206 E-mail: [email protected] COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Onshore Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Onshore Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd constitutes an infringement of copyright. DISCLAIMER: This report has been undertaken solely for Talison Lithium. No responsibility is accepted to any third party who may come into possession of this report in whatever manner and who may use or rely on the whole or any part of this report. If any such third party attempts to rely on any information contained in this report such party should obtain independent advice in relation to such information. i Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey Greenbushes Infrastructure Corridors EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Talison Lithium Pty Ltd (Talison) currently operates a lithium mine at Greenbushes, situated approximately 250km south of Perth in south-west Western Australia (Figure1). Talison is proposing to increase output from the Greenbushes Mine and as part of the current expansion of mining operations, requires flora and vegetation survey work to be completed within three proposed infrastructure corridors surrounding the mine site (Figure 2). Onshore Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd (Onshore Environmental) was commissioned by Talison to undertake a two season detailed flora and vegetation survey of remnant native vegetation occurring within the proposed infrastructure corridors, herein referred to as the study area. The field survey was completed by two Principal Botanists and one Senior Botanist from Onshore Environmental working over a six day period from the 30th July to the 6th August 2018, with a second season assessment completed over six spring days; 26th, 27th, 29th and 30th September, 3rd, 4th and 18th October 2018. A total number of 280 plant taxa (including varieties and subspecies) from 60 families and 157 genera were recorded from the study area. Species representation was greatest among the Fabaceae, Orchidaceae, Asparagaceae, Myrtaceae, Asteraceae, Cyperaceae, Proteaceae and Poaceae families. The most speciose genus was Acacia (17 taxa), followed by Caladenia (11 taxa), Lomandra (10 taxa), Stylidium (8 taxa), Hibbertia (7 taxa each), Drosera and Pterostylis (6 taxa each). None of the plant taxa recorded from the study area was gazetted as Threatened Flora (T) pursuant to subsection (2) of Section 23F of the Wildlife Conservation Act (1950) (WC Act), or listed under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). One Priority 4 flora taxon was recorded from within the study area; Acacia semitrullata. Acacia semitrullata was recorded as four plants from a single point location in state forest along the proposed powerline corridor. The Priority 2 flora taxon Melaleuca viminalis was recorded approximately 70 metres east (outside) of the proposed northern bypass road. Three plants were recorded in riparian vegetation adjacent to the Greenbushes “swimming pool”, a popular recreation site. The close proximity of this location to the ablution block and other exotic plantings suggests the individuals may have been introduced to the site. One taxon recorded from within the study area was identified to represent a significant range extension; Hybanthus epacroides. The nearest known record is from Gnowangerup approximately 180 km east of the study area. Hybanthus epacroides is known to occur in white or yellow sand in association with laterite. Within the study area it was recorded on orange sands weathered and deposited from laterite positioned higher in the landscape. This habitat type was specific and localised. A total of 45 introduced species were recorded from the study area, of which two taxa were listed as Declared Plants under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007 (BAM Act): *Asparagus asparagoides (Bridal Creeper) - s22(2); and *Rubus anglocandicans (Blackberry) - s22(2) (C3 Exempt). ii Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey Greenbushes Infrastructure Corridors A total of ten vegetation types from four broad landforms were described and mapped from within the corridor study area. Extensive field assessment confirmed there were no Threatened Ecological Communities (TECs) or Priority Ecological Communities (PECs) represented within the study area. Vegetation condition across the majority of the study area was rated as degraded (44.5 ha or 41% of the study area) reflecting a high proportion of the area having been disturbed and rehabilitated as part of historical tin mining operations. Approximately 12.6 ha (11% of the study area) had been cleared for a mixture of annual pasture, existing road infrastructure, and as part of historical mining activities; these areas do not support any native vegetation cover. Blocks of vegetation rated as completely degraded totaled 19.9 ha (18% of the study area) and included a mix of pine and bluegum plantation, and historical rehabilitation. Intact native vegetation was rated as very good (22.8 ha or 21% of the study area) or good (9.8 ha or 9% of the study area) with the primary disturbances resulting from hardwood logging activities or close proximity to disturbed ground, i.e. road verges. iii Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey Greenbushes Infrastructure Corridors TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Preamble .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Previous Surveys ........................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1 Location of the Greenbushes Mine. ............................................................................ 2 Figure 2 Greenbushes study area. ................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Climate .............................................................................................................................. 4 Figure 3 Climatic data for Greenbushes with monthly rainfall figures from January 2017 to October 2018. Rainfall data is from the Greenbushes Weather Station and temperature data from the Bridgetown Weather Station (Bureau of Meteorology 2018). ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Biogeographic Regions ................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Land Use ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.5.1 Agriculture and Associated Industry ............................................................................. 5 1.5.2 Mining ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5.3 Tourism ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Landforms, Soils ............................................................................................................. 6 1.7 Flora and Vegetation .................................................................................................... 7 2.0 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Legislation and Guidance Statements .................................................................... 8 2.2 Desktop Assessment ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Literature Review ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Database Searches ................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Assessment of Likelihood of Occurrence in the study area ............................................................. 9 Table 1 Ranking system used to assign the likelihood that a species would occur in the study area. ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Field Survey Methodology .......................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Timing and Personnel ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Spring Australian Plants Society Armidale & District Group

    Spring Australian Plants Society Armidale & District Group

    APS Armidale 2015_3 Spring Australian Plants Society Armidale & District Group PO Box 735 Armidale NSW 2350 Crowea exalata ssp magnifolia image by Maria Hitchcock Web: http://www.aps-armidale.org.au e-mail: [email protected] Spring Edition 2015 - 3 In this issue: Office bearers for 2015 ...p.2 President’s Message ...p.3 From little things, big things grow ...p.3 Garden Visits Report: Saturday 23 May …p.4 National Correa Collection Web Site ...p.5 Soltice Event Report: Sunday 21 June …p.6 Spring in Autumn and Winter ...p.6 Possum Magic in Armidale …p.7 A tale of “Pinky” and Others ...p.8 Mole Station Weekend ...p.9 A Pleasant Horticultural surprise ...p.10 Frost Likelihood Audit ...p.11 Photo: Leptospermum spectabile from the Mulquiney Garden (not in situ) photo C. Mulquiney. Frost Likelihood Audit Form ...p.14 Contact Us: Armidale & District Group PO Box 735, Armidale NSW 2350 President: Phil Rose Ph. 6775 3767 [email protected] Secretary: Helen Schwarz Ph. 6772 1584 [email protected] Treasurer: Carole Fullalove [email protected] From the newsletter editor: Dear members, this is your newsletter and all articles, snippets and photos are welcome. The issue deadlines are 2 weeks before the Business Meeting. Articles will be included based on a FIRST COME basis. Please send your articles, snippets etc to me. Page 1 APS Armidale 2015_3 Spring GROUP INFORMATION The Armidale and District Group of APS--NSW started on 6th August, 1977 as the New England Group of the Society for Growing Australian Plants. It has been running continuously since that time with a couple of name changes.
  • Human-Mediated Introductions of Australian Acacias

    Human-Mediated Introductions of Australian Acacias

    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2011) 17, 771–787 S EDITORIAL Human-mediated introductions of PECIAL ISSUE Australian acacias – a global experiment in biogeography 1 2 1 3,4 David M. Richardson *, Jane Carruthers , Cang Hui , Fiona A. C. Impson , :H Joseph T. Miller5, Mark P. Robertson1,6, Mathieu Rouget7, Johannes J. Le Roux1 and John R. U. Wilson1,8 UMAN 1 Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of ABSTRACT - Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, MEDIATED INTRODUCTIONS OF Aim Australian acacias (1012 recognized species native to Australia, which were Matieland 7602, South Africa, 2Department of History, University of South Africa, PO Box previously grouped in Acacia subgenus Phyllodineae) have been moved extensively 392, Unisa 0003, South Africa, 3Department around the world by humans over the past 250 years. This has created the of Zoology, University of Cape Town, opportunity to explore how evolutionary, ecological, historical and sociological Rondebosch 7701, South Africa, 4Plant factors interact to affect the distribution, usage, invasiveness and perceptions of a Protection Research Institute, Private Bag globally important group of plants. This editorial provides the background for the X5017, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa, 20 papers in this special issue of Diversity and Distributions that focusses on the 5Centre for Australian National Biodiversity global cross-disciplinary experiment of introduced Australian acacias. A Journal of Conservation Biogeography Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box Location Australia and global. 1600, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 6Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Methods The papers of the special issue are discussed in the context of a unified Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa, framework for biological invasions.
  • Flora and Vegetation Survey of the Proposed Kwinana to Australind Gas

    Flora and Vegetation Survey of the Proposed Kwinana to Australind Gas

    __________________________________________________________________________________ FLORA AND VEGETATION SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED KWINANA TO AUSTRALIND GAS PIPELINE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR Prepared for: Bowman Bishaw Gorham and Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Prepared by: Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd November 2003 MATTISKE CONSULTING PTY LTD DRD0301/039/03 __________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Location................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Climate .................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Declared Rare and Priority Flora......................................................................................................... 3 2.5 Local and Regional Significance........................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Threatened
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids

    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids

    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
  • Gloucester Park, Margaret

    Gloucester Park, Margaret

    Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River Prepared November 2016 for the Shire of Augusta Margaret River Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River, November 2016 This document has been prepared by Litoria Ecoservices for the express use of the client. Litoria Ecoservices accepts no responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. All rights reserved. No section or element of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of Litoria Ecoservices. Version Control Version Date Version Purpose Author Draft 1 29/11/ 2016 Draft for client review DMcK Final 1 5/12/2016 Complete Report D McK Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River, November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Site Description .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Assessment Objectives and Scope ....................................................................... 2 1.5 Personnel .............................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Landform .............................................................................................................
  • South West Region

    South West Region

    Regional Services Division – South West Region South West Region ‐ Parks & Wildlife and FPC Disturbance Operations Flora and Vegetation Survey Assessment Form 1. Proposed Operations: (to be completed by proponent) NBX0217 Summary of Proposed Operation: Road Construction and Timber Harvesting New road construction – 3.75km Existing road upgrade – 14.9km New gravel pit construction – 2ha (exploration area) Contact Person and Contact Details: Adam Powell [email protected] 0427 191 332 Area of impact; District/Region, State Forest Block, Coupe/Compartment (shapefile to be provided): Blackwood District South West Region Barrabup 0317 Period of proposed disturbance: November 2016 to December 2017 1 2.Desktop Assessment: (to be completed by the Region) ‐ Check Forest Ecosystem reservation. Forest Ecosystems proposed for impact: Jarrah Forest‐Blackwood Plateau, Shrub, herb and sedgelands, Darling Scarp Y Are activities in a Forest Ecosystem that triggers informal reservation under the FMP? The Darling Scarp Forest Ecosystem is a Poorly Reserved Forest Ecosystem and needs to be protected as an Informal Reserve under the Forest Management Plan (Appendix 11) ‐ Check Vegetation Complexes, extents remaining uncleared and in reservation (DEC 2007/EPA 2006). Vegetation Complex Pre‐European extent (%) Pre‐European extent (Ha) Extent in formal/informal reservation (%) Bidella (BD) 94% 44,898 47% Darling Scarp (DS) Figures not available Corresponds to Darling Scarp Forest Ecosystem extent Gale (GA) 80% 899 17% Jalbarragup (JL) 91% 14,786 32% Kingia (KI) 96% 97,735 34% Telerah (TL) 92% 25,548 33% Wishart (WS2) 84% 2,796 35% Y Do any complexes trigger informal reservation under the FMP? Darling Scarp complex as discussed above Y Are any complexes significant as per EPA regionally significant vegetation? Gale (GA) complex is cleared below the recommended retention of 1,500ha (Molloy et.al 2007) ‐ Check Threatened flora and TEC/PEC databases over an appropriate radius of the disturbance boundary.
  • 23/01/2014 Cons Timber Habitat Status Harvest ID Forest Red-Tailed

    23/01/2014 Cons Timber Habitat Status Harvest ID Forest Red-Tailed

    BMW0112 Detail Created: 23/01/2014 Cons Timber Habitat Common Name Scientific name Score FDIS Land System FDIS Landscape Unit Status Harvest ID Forest Red-tailed Black Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus banksii naso VU 12 High 32 Blackwood Plateau Jarrah Uplands Forest Red-tailed Black Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus banksii naso VU 12 High 34 Blackwood Plateau Depressions / Swamps Baudin's Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus baudinii EN 12 High 32 Blackwood Plateau Jarrah Uplands Baudin's Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus baudinii EN 12 High 34 Blackwood Plateau Depressions / Swamps Chuditch (Western Quoll) Dasyurus geoffroii VU Moderate 32 Blackwood Plateau Jarrah Uplands Chuditch (Western Quoll) Dasyurus geoffroii VU Moderate 34 Blackwood Plateau Depressions / Swamps Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus P4 Low 32 Blackwood Plateau Jarrah Uplands Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus P4 Low 34 Blackwood Plateau Depressions / Swamps Crested Shrike-tit Falcunculus frontatus P4 Low 32 Blackwood Plateau Jarrah Uplands Crested Shrike-tit Falcunculus frontatus P4 Low 34 Blackwood Plateau Depressions / Swamps Western Falspistrelle Falsistrellus mackenziei P4 12 High 32 Blackwood Plateau Jarrah Uplands Western Falspistrelle Falsistrellus mackenziei P4 12 High 34 Blackwood Plateau Depressions / Swamps Mud Minnow Galaxiella munda VU Moderate 34 Blackwood Plateau Depressions / Swamps White-bellied Frog Geocrinia alba CR 6 Low 32 Blackwood Plateau Jarrah Uplands Orange-bellied Frog Geocrinia vitellina VU 7 High 34 Blackwood Plateau Depressions / Swamps Quenda (Southern Brown Bandicoot) Isoodon
  • Vertebrate Fauna in the Southern Forests of Western Australia

    Vertebrate Fauna in the Southern Forests of Western Australia

    tssN 0085-8129 ODC151:146 VertebrateFauna in The SouthernForests of WesternAustralia A Survey P. CHRISTENSEN,A. ANNELS, G. LIDDELOW AND P. SKINNER FORESTS DEPARTMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA BULLETIN94, 1985 T:- VertebrateFauna in The SouthernForests of WesternAustralia A Survey By P. CHRISTENSEN, A. ANNELS, G. LIDDELOW AND P. SKINNER Edited by Liana ChristensenM.A. (w.A.I.T.) Preparedfor Publicationby Andrew C.A. Cribb B.A. (U.W.A.) P.J. McNamara Acting Conservator of Forcsts 1985 I I r FRONT COVER The Bush R.at (Rattus fuscipes): the most abundantof the native mammals recordedby the surueyteams in WesternAustralia's southernforests. Coverphotograph: B. A. & A. C. WELLS Printed in WesternAustralia Publishedby the ForestsDepartmeDt of WesternAustralia Editor MarianneR.L. Lewis AssistantEditor Andrew C.A. Cribb DesignTrish Ryder CPl9425/7/85- Bf Atthority WILLIAM BENBOW,Aciing Cov€mmenaPrinter, Wesrern Ausrralia + Contents Page SUMMARY SECTION I-INTRODUCTION HistoricalBackground. Recent Perspectives SECTION II-DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY AREA Boundariesand PhysicalFeatures 3 Geology 3 Soils 3 Climate 6 Vegetation 6 VegetationTypes. 8 SECTION III-SURVEY METHODS 13 SECTION IV-SURVEY RESULTSAND LIST OF SPECIES. l6 (A) MAMMALS Discussionof Findings. l6 List of Species (i) IndigenousSpecies .17 (ii) IntroducedSpecies .30 (B) BIRDS Discussionof Findings List of Species .34 (C) REPTILES Discussionof Findings. List of Species. .49 (D) AMPHIBIANS Discussionof Findings. 55 List of Species. 55 (E) FRESHWATER FISH Discussionof Findings. .59 List of Species (i) IndigenousSpecies 59 (ii) IntroducedSpecies 6l SECTION V-GENERALDISCUSSION 63 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 68 REFERENCES 69 APPENDICES I-Results from Fauna Surveys 1912-t982 72 II-Results from Other ResearchStudies '74 Within The SurveyArea 1970-1982.
  • Structural Botany / Botánica Estructural

    Structural Botany / Botánica Estructural

    Botanical Sciences 99(3): 588-598. 2021 Received: October 15, 2020, Accepted: December 1, 2020 DOI: 10.17129/botsci.2776 AcaciaOn linecornigera first: April 15, 2021 Structural Botany / Botánica Estructural FLORAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MYRMECOPHYTIC ACACIA CORNIGERA (LEGUMINOSAE) DESARROLLO FLORAL DE LA MIRMECÓFITA ACACIA CORNIGERA (LEGUMINOSAE) SANDRA LUZ GÓMEZ-ACEVEDO1,2 1 Unidad de Morfología y Función. Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlalnepantla, Estado de México, México. 2 Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México. Author for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Background: The Neotropical ant-acacias show morphological variations in their vegetative characteristics as a consequence of their relation- ship with ants. However, there is no information regarding whether floral organs have also undergone any modification that prevents resident ants from approaching the inflorescences in anthesis. Questions: Are the patterns of floral development affected by the relationship with ants? Is there any floral organ or structure involved in avoid- ing the presence of ants during the flowering period? At what stage of development do these modifications arise, if at all? Studied species: Acacia cornigera (L.) Willd. Study site: Santiago Pinotepa Nacional, Oaxaca and Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz. March and May 2015. Methods: Dissections of inflorescences in every developmental stage from two populations, were examined using scanning electron micros- copy. Results: The inception patterns of the calyx (irregular), corolla (simultaneous), androecium (acropetally in alternate sectors) and gynoecium (precocious) agree with previous reports for non-myrmecophyic species of the Acacia genus. In mature stages, the presence of stomata is char- acteristic of bracts and petals.
  • Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park

    Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park

    Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park Hiltaba Pastoral Lease and Gawler Ranges National Park, South Australia Survey conducted: 12 to 22 Nov 2012 Report submitted: 22 May 2013 P.J. Lang, J. Kellermann, G.H. Bell & H.B. Cross with contributions from C.J. Brodie, H.P. Vonow & M. Waycott SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes Bush Blitz – Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges NP, November 2012 Report submitted to Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study: 22 May 2013. Published online on http://data.environment.sa.gov.au/: 25 Nov. 2016. ISBN 978-1-922027-49-8 (pdf) © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resouces, South Australia, 2013. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, images, and other material or devices protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, this report is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. All other rights are reserved. This report should be cited as: Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1, 2, Bell, G.H.1 & Cross, H.B.1, 2, 3 (2013). Flora survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park: vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes. Report for Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1State Herbarium of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
  • A Conserved Role for the NAM/Mir164 Developmental

    A Conserved Role for the NAM/Mir164 Developmental

    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 13 January 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01239 AConservedRoleforthe NAM/miR164 Developmental Module Reveals a Common Mechanism Underlying Carpel Margin Fusion in Monocarpous and Syncarpous Eurosids Aurélie C. M. Vialette-Guiraud1, Aurélie Chauvet1, Juliana Gutierrez-Mazariegos1, Alexis Eschstruth2, Pascal Ratet2 and Charles P. Scutt1* 1 Laboratoire de Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, UMR 5667, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique – Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique – Université de Lyon, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France, 2 Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique – Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique – Université de Paris Sud, Orsay, France The majority of angiosperms are syncarpous- their gynoecium is composed of two or more fused carpels. In Arabidopsis thaliana, this fusion is regulated through the Edited by: balance of expression between CUP SHAPED COTYLEDON (CUC) genes, which are Rainer Melzer, University College Dublin, Ireland orthologs of the Petunia hybrida transcription factor NO APICAL MERISTEM (NAM), and Reviewed by: their post-transcriptional regulator miR164. Accordingly, the expression of a miR164- Stefan De Folter, insensitive form of A. thaliana CUC2 causes a radical breakdown of carpel fusion. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Here, we investigate the role of the NAM/miR164 genetic module in carpel closure Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico in monocarpous plants. We show that the disruption of this module in monocarpous Barbara Ambrose, flowers of A. thaliana aux1-22 mutants causes a failure of carpel closure, similar The New York Botanical Garden, USA to the failure of carpel fusion observed in the wild-type genetic background.