DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Pipeline Desktop Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FI Joint-Venture Pty Ltd Yogi - Magnetite Project Yogi Western Pipeline Desktop Assessment April 2020 Executive summary FI Joint Venture (FIJV) proposes to construct and operate a magnetite iron ore project located approximately 250 kilometres (km) east-northeast of Geraldton and 15 km northeast of Yalgoo in the Mid-West, Western Australia (WA). The Yogi Magnetite Mine project (the Proposal) will also require the construction of a magnetite slurry pipeline, a water pipeline from the mine site to Geraldton Port, a return water pipeline, and a gas supply pipeline from the Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas (DBNG) Pipeline network. GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by FIJV to undertake a desktop assessment of the western portion of the pipeline development envelope. This desktop assessment will be used to inform the environmental assessment and approvals process. The Pipeline Development Envelope (PDE) encompasses the western portion of the total proposed pipeline area and broadly follows the Mt Magnet Road extending from the Geraldton port eastwards to Pindar. The study area was defined for the desktop assessment based searches and includes a 40 km buffer of the PDE. Database searches identified two federally listed TECs potentially occurring within the study area: Subtropical and Temperate Coastal Saltmarsh, and Eucalypt Woodlands of the Western Australian Wheatbelt (DAWE 2020). The DBCA TEC and PEC database search identified an additional two PECs and/or their buffers occurring within the study area: Plant assemblages of the Moresby Range system and Coastal sands dominated by Acacia rosterllifera, Eucalyptus oraria and Eucalyptus obtusiflora (Geraldton area). No TECs/PECs intersect the PDE. The NatureMap database identified 1964 flora species, representing 152 families as occurring within the study area. This total comprises 1781 native flora species, and 183 naturalised (non- native) flora species. Desktop searches of the EPBC Act PMST, NatureMap, DBCA TPFL and WAHERB databases identified the presence/potential presence of 193 conservation significant flora species within the study area. Likelihood assessments identified 85 flora taxa considered ‘Likely’ to occur within the PDE. The NatureMap database identified 643 fauna species recorded within the study area. This total included 264 birds, 237 invertebrates, 34 mammals, 96 reptiles, and 12 amphibian species. Searches of the EPBC Act PMST (DAWE 2018), DBCA Threatened and Priority Fauna database and NatureMap database (DBCA 2007–) identified the presence/potential presence of 47 conservation significant fauna species. Likelihood assessments indicated that there are 12 fauna taxa ‘Known’ (previously recorded) to occur within the PDE. No wetlands (RAMSAR or of National importance), DBCA managed lands or Environmentally Sensitive Areas intersect the PDE. GHD | Report for FI Joint Venture Pty Ltd - Yogi - Magnetite Project, 6137117 | i Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project background .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose of this report........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project location .................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Scope of works .................................................................................................................... 1 1.5 Relevant legislation, conservation code and background information ................................ 1 1.6 Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 5 3. Desktop assessment ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Climate ................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Regional biogeography ........................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Landforms and soils ............................................................................................................. 7 3.4 Land systems ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Land use .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.3 Vegetation and flora ........................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Fauna ................................................................................................................................. 16 4. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Key Findings ...................................................................................................................... 18 5. References ................................................................................................................................... 19 Table index Table 1 Key legislation relevant to the project .................................................................................. 2 Table 2 Information sources ............................................................................................................. 4 Table 3 Soil landscape systems ............................................................................................................... 8 Table 4 Areas proclaimed under RIWI Act in project area ............................................................... 9 Table 5 Broad scale vegetation associations intersecting the study area (Beard 1976) ....................... 10 Table 6 Extents of vegetation associations mapped with the extent of the study area (Beard 1976, GoWA 2019) ............................................................................................................ 11 Table 7 Conservation significant ecological communities identified in the desktop searches occurring within the study area .......................................................................................... 15 GHD | Report for FI Joint Venture Pty Ltd - Yogi - Magnetite Project, 6137117 | ii Figure index Figure 1 Project locality .......................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 2 Land use constraints ................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 3 Hydrology constraints ............................................................................................................... 22 Figure 4 Biological constraints ............................................................................................................... 22 Appendices Appendix A - Figures Appendix B – Relevant legislation, conservation codes and background information Appendix C – Database searches Appendix D – Flora likelihood assessment Appendix E – Fauna likelihood assessment GHD | Report for FI Joint Venture Pty Ltd - Yogi - Magnetite Project, 6137117 | iii 1. Introduction 1.1 Project background FI Joint Venture (FIJV) proposes to construct and operate a magnetite iron ore project located approximately 250 kilometres (km) east-northeast of Geraldton and 15 km northeast of Yalgoo in the Mid-West, Western Australia (WA). The Yogi Magnetite Mine project (the Proposal) will also require the construction of a magnetite slurry pipeline, a water pipeline from the mine site to Geraldton Port, a return water pipeline, and a gas supply pipeline from the Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas (DBNG) Pipeline network. 1.2 Purpose of this report GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by FIJV to undertake the environmental approvals for the Proposal. Previously, GHD conducted a reconnaissance flora and vegetation study and a Level 1 fauna study of the western portion of the Pipeline Development Envelope (PDE). To support environmental approvals for the Project, GHD has also completed flora, vegetation and fauna assessments of the Mine Development Envelope (MDE) (GHD 2019a & GHD 2019b). Following preliminary comments from the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), GHD has undertaken an additional ecological desktop assessment for the western portion of the PDE. The purpose of this assessment is to identify key flora, vegetation and fauna values in the western portion of the PDE. The outcome of the desktop assessment will be used to inform the environmental assessment and approvals process. 1.3 Project location 1.3.1 Pipeline Development Envelope The PDE encompasses the western portion of the total proposed pipeline area and broadly follows the Mt Magnet Road extending
Recommended publications
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order

    Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order

    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
  • Table 5.8 – Descriptions of Priority Flora Recorded in the Project Area Species, Family and Rank Descriptio

    Table 5.8 – Descriptions of Priority Flora Recorded in the Project Area Species, Family and Rank Descriptio

    Oakajee Port and Rail OPR Rail Proposal – Vegetation and Flora Assessment Table 5.8 – Descriptions of Priority Flora Recorded in the Project Area No of No of Plants Species, Family and Locations Description Typical Habitat Recorded by Distribution Photographs Rank Recorded by ecologia ecologia A dense, rounded shrub growing from 0.5 m to 2 m in height. Its phyllodes are erect and the yellow, globular flowers are produced from June to August. Acacia lineolata Mullewa, east of subsp. multilineata (Photograph on right by S.J. Patrick. Image used Mingenew, Arrino with the permission of the Western Australian Sandplains. 1 1 (FABACEAE) and the locality of Herbarium, Department of Environment and Yuna. Priority 1 Conservation (http://florabase.dec.wa.gov.au/help/copyright). Accessed on Thursday, 3 December 2009) and growth habit again (right) (Photography: ecologia). Chamelaucium sp. 73 km south of Yalgoo (Y. Chadwick A bushy low shrub to 1.5 m high. This species Yalgoo, near Blue 1816) produces white/pink/purple flowers during Granite outcrops. 2 3 Hills, along Morawa‐ (MYRTACEAE) August and September. Yalgoo Road, and Wurarga. Priority 1 An upright, leafless, semi‐succulent herb that grows to between 0.4 and 1 m, although it has been recorded as growing to 2 m. The stems are Robinson Ranges, Euphorbia light green, and have a bluish‐grey waxy light Sandstone and Mount Augustus sarcostemmoides covering. When broken a white sap is exuded quartzite hills but Station. Also East from the stems. The rarely present leaves are has been located 67 254 Chewing Ranges, (EUPHORBIACEAE) narrow, lanceolate, opposite and are held on flat plains at Mount Giles and Priority 1 horizontally.
  • Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park

    Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park

    Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park 2013 Damien Rathbone Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region, 120 Albany Hwy, Albany, 6330. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposed, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. However, the author and participating bodies take no responsibiliy for how this informrion is used subsequently by other and accepts no liability for a third parties use or reliance upon this report. CITATION Rathbone, DA. (2013) Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park. Unpublished report. Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank many people that provided valable assistance and input into the project. Sarah Barrett, Anita Barnett, Karen Rusten, Deon Utber, Sarah Comer, Charlotte Mueller, Jason Peters, Roger Cunningham, Chris Rathbone, Carol Ebbett and Janet Newell provided assisstance with fieldwork. Carol Wilkins, Rachel Meissner, Juliet Wege, Barbara Rye, Mike Hislop, Cate Tauss, Rob Davis, Greg Keighery, Nathan McQuoid and Marco Rossetto assissted with plant identification. Coralie Hortin, Karin Baker and many other members of the Albany Wildflower society helped with vouchering of plant specimens. 2 Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................
  • FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve

    FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve

    FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve This project was supported by NACC NRM and the Shire of Morawa through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program Canna Reserve BioBlitz 2019 Weaving and wonder in the wilderness! The weather may have been hot and dry, but that didn’t stop everyone having fun and learning about the rich biodiversity and conservation value of the wonderful Canna Reserve during the highly successful 2019 BioBlitz. On the 14 - 15 September 2019, NACC NRM together with support from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions and the Shire of Morawa, hosted their third BioBlitz at the Canna Reserve in the Shire of Morawa. Fifty professional biologists and citizen scientists attended the event with people travelling from near and far including Morawa, Perenjori, Geraldton and Perth. After an introduction and Acknowledgement of Country from organisers Jessica Stingemore and Jarna Kendle, the BioBlitz kicked off with participants separating into four teams and heading out to explore Canna Reserve with the goal of identifying as many plants, birds, invertebrates, and vertebrates as possible in a 24 hr period. David Knowles of Spineless Wonders led the invertebrate survey with assistance from, OAM recipient Allen Sundholm, Jenny Borger of Jenny Borger Botanical Consultancy led the plant team, BirdLife Midwest member Alice Bishop guided the bird survey team and David Pongracz from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions ran the vertebrate surveys with assistance from volunteer Corin Desmond. The BioBlitz got off to a great start identifying 80 plant species during the first survey with many more species to come and even a new orchid find for the reserve.
  • 1 a Survey of the Flora of Remnants Within the Waddy

    1 a Survey of the Flora of Remnants Within the Waddy

    1 A SURVEY OF THE FLORA OF REMNANTS WITHIN THE WADDY FOREST LAND CONSERVATION DISTRICT Stephen Davies and Phil Ladd for the Waddy Forest Land Conservation District Committee March 2000 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 METHODS 3 RESULTS 4 DISCUSSION 56 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 59 REFERENCES 60 Appendix 1 - Composite plant list 60 Appendix 2 - Plants found outside the sample sites 67 Appendix 3 - Composite bird list 67 3 INTRODUCTION The Waddy Forest Land Conservation District is about 41,000 hectares and contains 23 substantial land holdings. In 1999 the District received a grant from the National Heritage Trust to survey the flora of its remnant vegetation. Much of this is on private property and the District Committee selected thirty three plots of remnant bushland on private farms to be included in flora survey. The present report is based on visits to these thirty three remnants that lie on 14 of the 23 farms in the district. The surveys are intended to provide information about the biodiversity of the various remnants with the aim of establishing the priority for preservation, by fencing, of the remnants and to determine the value of linking some of them by the planting of corridors of vegetation. At each site the local landholder(s) joined the survey and provided invaluable background information about the history of the remnants. The vegetation of this part of the northern wheatbelt is known to be very diverse. The Marchagee Nature Reserve, lying north west of the District, was surveyed between 1975 and 1977 (Dell et al. 1979). The area was covered by Beard in his vegetation mapping project (Beard 1976), and part of the south of the District was covered in a report on Koobabbie Farm in 1990 (Davies 1990).
  • Blue Hills Mungada West and East (Tenements M59/595 and M59/596) Infrastructure Areas; Targeted Flora Surveys June, July and September 2011

    Blue Hills Mungada West and East (Tenements M59/595 and M59/596) Infrastructure Areas; Targeted Flora Surveys June, July and September 2011

    SMC: Blue Hills Mungada West and East (Tenements M59/595 and M59/596) Infrastructure Areas; Targeted Flora Surveys June, July and September 2011 15 March 2012 Version 2 (Final) maia.net.au SMC: Blue Hills Mungada West and East (Tenements M59/595 and M59/596) Infrastructure Areas This document describes the vegetation and flora recorded during targeted flora surveys carried out for Sinosteel Midwest Corporation in June, July and September 2011 on tenements M59/595 and M59/596 at Mungada West and East at Blue Hills. It also discusses the significance of the flora and vegetation of the Infrastructure Areas surveyed and estimates impacts to the significant flora and vegetation of these areas. Maia Environmental Consultancy Pty Ltd ABN 25 141 503 184 PO Box 1213 Subiaco WA 6904 Document Prepared By: Rochelle Haycock and Scott Hitchcock Document Reviewed By: Christina Cox Document Revision Number: 2 (Final) Date: 15 March 2012 This document has been prepared for Sinosteel Midwest Corporation Limited (SMC) by Maia Environmental Consultancy Pty Ltd (Maia). Copyright and any intellectual property associated with the document belong to Maia and Sinosteel Midwest Corporation. The document may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the permission of SMC or Maia. SMC: Blue Hills Mungada West and East (Tenements M59/595 and M59/596) Infrastructure Areas Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................
  • Charles Darwin Reserve

    Charles Darwin Reserve

    CHARLES DARWIN RESERVE (WHITE WELLS STATION) WESTERN AUSTRALIA FIELD HERBARIUM Volunteers of the Bushland Plant Survey Project Wildflower Society of Western Australia (Inc.) PO Box 519 Floreat WA 6014 for Bush Heritage Australia July 2010 This project was supported by the Wildflower Society of Western Australia Support was also provided by the WA Department of Environment and Conservation NOTE: This Field Herbarium is to remain the property of Bush Heritage, in so long as the Reserve is managed sympathetically with the bushland, and the owners are able to care for the Herbarium so it does not deteriorate. In the event these criteria cannot be met the Field Herbarium is to be handed over to the Geraldton Regional Herbarium. For further information contact the WA Herbarium, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983 Phone (08) 9334 0500. Charles Darwin Reserve (White Wells Station), Western Australia – Field Herbarium CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................... 1 Map 1 Wildflower Society of WA survey sites at Charles Darwin Reserve - August 2008 .......................... 2 Map 2 Wildflower Society of WA survey sites at Charles Darwin Reserve – October 2008 ........................ 3 2 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 3 THE FIELD HERBARIUM ..........................................................................................................................
  • Structural Botany / Botánica Estructural

    Structural Botany / Botánica Estructural

    Botanical Sciences 99(3): 588-598. 2021 Received: October 15, 2020, Accepted: December 1, 2020 DOI: 10.17129/botsci.2776 AcaciaOn linecornigera first: April 15, 2021 Structural Botany / Botánica Estructural FLORAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MYRMECOPHYTIC ACACIA CORNIGERA (LEGUMINOSAE) DESARROLLO FLORAL DE LA MIRMECÓFITA ACACIA CORNIGERA (LEGUMINOSAE) SANDRA LUZ GÓMEZ-ACEVEDO1,2 1 Unidad de Morfología y Función. Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlalnepantla, Estado de México, México. 2 Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México. Author for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Background: The Neotropical ant-acacias show morphological variations in their vegetative characteristics as a consequence of their relation- ship with ants. However, there is no information regarding whether floral organs have also undergone any modification that prevents resident ants from approaching the inflorescences in anthesis. Questions: Are the patterns of floral development affected by the relationship with ants? Is there any floral organ or structure involved in avoid- ing the presence of ants during the flowering period? At what stage of development do these modifications arise, if at all? Studied species: Acacia cornigera (L.) Willd. Study site: Santiago Pinotepa Nacional, Oaxaca and Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz. March and May 2015. Methods: Dissections of inflorescences in every developmental stage from two populations, were examined using scanning electron micros- copy. Results: The inception patterns of the calyx (irregular), corolla (simultaneous), androecium (acropetally in alternate sectors) and gynoecium (precocious) agree with previous reports for non-myrmecophyic species of the Acacia genus. In mature stages, the presence of stomata is char- acteristic of bracts and petals.
  • The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project

    The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project

    The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project Department of Environment and Conservation The Wheatbelt NRM June, 2011 The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project , June 2011 [The map layer and vegetation attribute outputs from this project can be viewed in the DEC NatureMap website .] ANVMP contributors were: Ben Bayliss - Source map interpretation, spatial data capture (GIS), NVIS vegetation attribute interpretation; Brett Glossop - Database development and NVIS data structure interpretation for the ANVMP; Paul Gioia - Naturemap website applications; Jane Hogben - Source map digitisation, GIS; Ann Rick – reinterpretation of Lake Campion vegetation mapping to NVIS criteria. Jeff Richardson - Avon Terrestrial Baseline ND 001 program Coordinating Ecologist. Tim Gamblin - Avon Terrestrial Baseline ND 001 Technical Officer. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER In undertaking this work, the authors have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. Any information provided in the reports and maps made available is presented in good faith and the authors and participating bodies take no responsibility for how this information is used subsequently by others and accept no liability whatsoever for a third party’s use of or reliance upon these reports, maps, or any data or information accessed via related websites. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................2
  • Acacia in THIS ISSUE Dacacia the Name Acacia Comes This Issue of Seed Notes from the Greek Acacia, Ace Will Cover the Genus Or Acis Meaning a Point Or Acacia

    Acacia in THIS ISSUE Dacacia the Name Acacia Comes This Issue of Seed Notes from the Greek Acacia, Ace Will Cover the Genus Or Acis Meaning a Point Or Acacia

    No. 9 Acacia IN THIS ISSUE DAcacia The name Acacia comes This issue of Seed Notes from the Greek acacia, ace will cover the genus or acis meaning a point or Acacia. thorn, or from acazo, to D Description sharpen, although this name applies more to African than D Geographic Australian species (Australian distribution and Acacia have no thorns or habitat larger prickles, unlike those D Reproductive biology that are native to Africa). D Seed collection Many species of Acacia, or wattles as they are commonly D Phyllodes and flowers of Acacia aprica. Photo – Andrew Crawford Seed quality called in Australia, are valuable assessment for a range of uses, in D Seed germination particular as garden plants. Description In Australia, Acacia (family is modified to form a leaf- D Recommended reading They are also used for amenity plantings, windbreaks, shade DMimosaceae) are woody like structure or phyllode. trees, groundcovers, erosion plants that range from These phyllodes may be flat and salinity control. The timber prostrate under-shrubs to or terete. Some species do of some Acacia is very hard tall trees. Acacia flowers are not have phyllodes and the and is ideal for fence posts small, regular and usually flattened stems or cladodes (e.g. A. saligna or jam). Other bisexual. They occur in spikes act as leaves. Foliage can Acacia species are used to or in globular heads and vary from blueish to dark make furniture and ornaments. range in colour from cream green to silvery grey. Most The seed of some wattles is to intense yellow. The leaves species of Acacia have glands a good food source for birds, of Acacia may be bipinnate on the axis of the phyllodes, other animals and humans (the primary leaflets being although in Australian as ‘bush tucker’.
  • RCM028 Hutt Lagoon Condition Report

    RCM028 Hutt Lagoon Condition Report

    Resource Condition Report for a Significant Western Australian Wetland Hutt Lagoon 2009 Figure 1 – A view across the water body at Hutt Lagoon, coloured pink by alga. This report was prepared by: Anna Nowicki, Technical Officer, Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 51, Wanneroo 6946 Adrian Pinder, Senior Research Scientist, Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 51, Wanneroo 6946 Stephen Kern, Botanist, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre 6983 Glen Daniel, Environmental Officer, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre 6983 Invertebrate sorting and identification by: Nadine Guthrie, Research Scientist, Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 51, Wanneroo 6946 Ross Gordon, Project Officer, Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 51, Wanneroo 6946 Prepared for: Inland Aquatic Integrity Resource Condition Monitoring Project, Strategic Reserve Fund, Department of Environment and Conservation August 2009 Suggested Citation: Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) (2009). Resource Condition Report for a Significant Western Australian Wetland: Hutt Lagoon. Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, Western Australia. Contents 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................1 1.1. Site Code ...............................................................................................................1 1.2.
  • Kalannie Region

    Kalannie Region

    Botanical name Acacia daphnifolia Meisn. Synonym: microbotrya var. borealis E. Pritzel, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 35: 300 (1904). Common name Northern Manna Wattle. Characteristic features Bushy shrubs or small trees, often forming dense clonal clumps by root suckers. Phyllodes normally oblanceolate, straight to shallowly falcately recurved, widely spreading, glaucous to sub-glaucous, with one longitudinal nerve on each face, apices obtuse to acute (sometimes acuminate); glands normally single (rarely 2). Heads globular, showy, arranged in short racemes, the raceme axes and peduncles appressed hairy. Pods moniliform to sub-moniliform, 7-8 mm wide. Seeds large; funicle encircling seeds in a single fold and drying red- brown. Flowering around autumn. Description Note. Acacia microbotyra is a somewhat variable species and is in need of critical revision. The description here applies only to plants occurring within the Kalannie region. Habit. Bushy, +/- rounded shrubs or +/- obconic small trees mostly 2-4 m tall with crowns 2-5 m across, often forming dense clonal clumps by root suckers, dividing at ground level into 2-4 main trunks (6-9 cm in diameter at breast height) or with a single trunk (about 11 cm diameter at ground level) to about 1 m before branching, crowns on oldest plants occupying 20-30% of the total plant height, Bark. Grey, thin and hard, shallowly longitudinally fissured with fine transverse fractures, exfoliating in short strips on oldest trunks, smooth on upper branches. Gum. Sometimes exuded from the trunks and/or branches. Branchlets.