Book of Authorities of the Purchaser, Birch Communications Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Book of Authorities of the Purchaser, Birch Communications Inc Court File No. CV-16-11257-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE OR ARRANGMENT OF PRIMUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CANADA INC., PRIMUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND LINGO, INC. BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF THE PURCHASER (BIRCH COMMUNICATIONS INC.) GOODMANS LLP Barristers & Solicitors Bay Adelaide Centre 333 Bay Street, Suite 3400 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S7 Jason Wadden LSUC#: 46757M Tel: 416.979.2211 Fax: 416.979.1234 Lawyers for the Purchaser, Birch Communications Inc. I N D E X INDEX TAB CASE 1. Debtors and Creditors Sharing the Burden: A Review of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce, November 2003, at pp. 138-139. 2. Extreme Retail (Canada) Inc. v. Bank of Montreal, [2007] O.J. No. 3304 (S.C.J. [Comm. List]) at paras 20-21. 3. Re Allen-Vanguard Corp., 2011 ONSC 5017 at paras 108-111. 4. Royal Bank v. Body Blue Inc., [2008] O.J. No. 1628 (S.C.J.) at paras 18-19. 5. Canadian Red Cross Society, Re, [1998] O.J. No. 3306 (Gen. Div. [Comm. List]) at para 42. 6. L&L Tool Inc. v. General Motors Corp., [2004] O.J. No. 2785 (S.C.J.) at paras 3, 51- 55. 7. Air Canada Pilots Assn. v. Air Canada Ace Aviation Holdings Inc., [2007] O.J. No. 89 (S.C.J.) at paras 44-45, aff’d 2008 ONCA 531. 8. Re Target Canada Co., 2016 ONSC 316 at paras 19, 74, 77, 80, 81, and 85. 9. Romspen Investment Corp. v. Edgeworth Properties, 2014 ONSC 4340 at para 39. 10. Ashley v. Marlow Group Private Portfolio Management Inc., [2006] O.J. No. 1195 (S.C.J. [Comm List]) at para 78. 1 DEBTORS C DITORS sNG T E EN. A Review of the Bankruptcy /InsolvencyAct and the Comperes'Crechiars Air ementAct Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Banking'Dade and Commerce Chair The Honourable Richard H.Kroft Deputy. Chair The Honourable David T.kachuir November 2003 j, Executoty Contracts Executory contracts are contracts under which something remains to be done by one or mote of the parties to the Contract. In essence, it is a contract where there are obligations yet to be completed. Examples include leases, intellectual property tights and employment contracts, among ... the existence of Neitl, et the TATA_ n the cr,A A uses the expression [execateny these "executory contract." contracts in a ulna/ion ofinsolvency raises the gnestion ofthe extent to Nevertheless, the existence of these contracts in a which these private situation ofinsolvency raises the question of the extent to contracts— negotiated in which these private contracts — negotiated in good faith and goodfaith and with dare with due consideration of risk— should be altered or consideration of terminated, under what circumstances and by whom. risk,— shottld be altered Alteration or termination of contractual rights change terminated, under what expectations, reduce predictability in contracting and increase circamstances and by risks, which will have negative implications. As well, both whom. contracting parties may experience harm, since the continuation of a contract may he in the hest interest of both parties. Canadian legislation in this area has existed for some time. The BankVtg Act passed in 1949 contained few restraints on completed contracts; as well, it explicitly recognized the applicability of provincial/territorial law to real estate leases. Various onmibus bills in the 1970s and 1980s, all of which died on the Order Paper, proposed that an insolvent .person who wished to make a proposal could disclaim any executory contract, and the co-contracting party would have the right to file a claim.in the proposal for damages; the insolvent company could continue as a going concern, While the co-contracting party to the disclaimed contract would be no worse off than if a bankruptcy had occurred. Amendments to the WA in 1992 provide that, after a reorganization begins, secured creditors cannot exercise their security; the termination of a lease, licensing agreement or public utility because of default wasalso prevented. Debtors, however, were given the ability to disclaim leases on real property. 132 Witnesses presented the Committee with divergent opinions on whether disclaimer of executory contracts should be allowed, with the Court's permission, by insolvency practitioners or by co-contracting patties. Some witnesses told us that a company involved in a reorganization should be permitted to renounce such contracts, This view was held, for example, by Mr, Mendelsohn, who told the Committee — in reference to the CCAA — that "reorganizing entities [do and should] have the ability to renounce executory contracts, with appropriate judicial supervision." After noting that, under the BIA, only commercial leases of real estate where the reorganizing entity is the lessee can be renounced, he argued that: a coherent system of restructuring must permit the entity to renounce other executory contracts as well informed us that "[i]f executory contracts have to be renounced, they have to be renounced whether ,.., [the] company [is big at small]." Mr. Mendelsohn also shared the view-that a bankruptcy trustee should be able to assign and transfer executory contracts to third parties, including licensing arrangements and leases of premises. He believed that "a trustee in bankruptcy should be given the right to realize, fox the benefit: of creditors, whatever economic value resides in the assets, including executory contract assets." The Joint Task Force on Business Insolvency haw Reform also spoke about the ability to disclaim executory contracts and assignment to third parties, In the Joint Task Force's opinion,"Where should be, a general right to disclaim (reject) executory contracts (including teal property leases) in all bankruptcy and reorganization proceedings," Although it does not: believe that insolvent organizations or the trustee in bankruptcy should require Court approval in order to disclaim these contracts existing at the date of commencement of proceedings, the Joint Task Force argued that "the legislation could impose some pre-conditions to the exercise of the disclaimer power either generally, or with respect to certain types of contracts," Regarding the ability to assign executory contracts, the joint Taslc Force informed the Committee that "ttustees 133 bankruptcy and court-appointed receivers should have the power to assign executory contacts (not including eligible financial contracts) both in connection with going concern transactions and on a liquidation basis," subject to a number of limitations. It went on to note, however, that "Where should be provision for the court to prohibit an assignment if [the non-bankrupt party to the contract] establishes that the proposed assignee does not meet, in a material way, criteria reasonably applied by [it] before entering into similar agreements ,. or the proposed assignee is less creditworthy than [the bankrupt] was when the executory contract was entered into and reasonable assurances of payment have not been provided with respect to any credit required to be extended to the assignee by [the non-bankrupt party] under the executory contract after the assignment." The Canadian Bankers Association, however, told the Committee that "Nnsolvency law constraints on contracts can affect pre-insolvency contracting behaviour and may reduce credit availability. The new economy dictates that companies must be innovative and dynamic. In order to finance such new enterprises, financiers must be able to rely on the negotiated terms of their contracts." A particular executory contract — a collective agreement — was discussed by several witnesses, including representatives of organized labour. In general, their view is that the Court A particular executory should not be able to terminate a collective agreement,in contract— a collective whole or in part. The CAW-Canada told the Committee that agreement— was "the CCAA offers no authority to a Court to abrogate a discussed by several collective agreement. Nor should it do so. Still, some counsel witnesses, including and commentators believe that Superior Courts in Canada representatives of have an 'inherent jurisdiction' to issue an order pursuant to the organized labour, CCAA which suspends or temporarily cancels one or more terms of a collective agreement. We fundamentally disagree." In the union's opinion,"Where can be no dispute that if the preservation of the status quo is a key objective of the CCAA,then the terms and conditions of employment defined in a collective agreement at the time of the issuance of a CCAA order must be maintained subject to the parties' mutual authority to negotiate changes," From this perspective, the 134 CAW-Canada told the Committee that"Nhe CCAA should ... make clear that it is not open to a Court,in exercising its `inherent jurisdiction' to alter, waive, or override the provisions of a collective agreement without the consent of the employer and the relevant trade union." A similar view was presented to the Committee by the United Steelworkers of America, which told us that "the Courts should not be entitled, under the guise of a CCAA proceeding, to interfere with the operation of freely negotiated collective agreements which affect the rights of many workers. ... Pinions have demonstrated, in times of legitimate economic crisis, that they are capable of acting responsibly and in the best interests of their membership to agree to amendments to a collective agreement which may be necessary to enable the employer to survive. This cooperative approach is to be preferred to an approach which would eliminate workers (sic) rights with the stroke of a pen and subvert the primacy of collective bargaining." Moreover, the Canadian Labour Congress differentiated collective agreements from other executory contracts, and indicated to the Committee that "[Bust as employees are not like other creditors, collective agreements are not like other contracts.
Recommended publications
  • The Cord Weekly
    A WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY STUDENT PUBLICATION THEVOLUME XXXIII ISSUECORD 6 SEPTEMBER 24 1992 Taking back the night CATHY JO NOBLE Students' Union bylaw 13 specifically states The Cord that "the corporation shall not discriminate, nor shall recognize any group, club, or other organiza- Was the recent "Take Back the Night" event tion that discriminates against any member(s) of the — which didn't allow men to participate in the Corporation on the basis of sex, origin, age, place march -- discriminatory? of origin, political belief, religious belief, or physi- Last Thursday's "Take Back the Night" was cal disability." billed as a peace keeping march to protest violence This bylaw caused the Students' Union just last against women and to celebrate women's power. week to cancel self defense classes claiming that Men were not allowed to participate in the they were discriminating against men since men march itself. Flyers supporting the event stated that could not attend the classes. Yet, Students' Union " it was A March for Women Only." did support the "Take Back the Night" event. Caroline White, Public Education Co-ordinator When asked if "Take Back the Night" violated for the K-W Women's Sexual Support Centre ex- the same bylaw, Alexandra Stangret, VP Student plained that the event is not discriminating since Affairs said that "Students' Union supported the "the women only march is symbolic of the fact that event as a whole not specifically the march. Men women should be able to walk where they want and were allowed and did participate in other aspects of how they want without male protection." the event such as the coffee house and speaker's White explained that if men were to participate corner." Stangret said the event was not dis- in the march the symbolism would be lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Court File No. CV-15-10832-00CL ONTARIO
    Court File No. CV-15-10832-00CLCV-l5-10832-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OFOF' JUSTICE [COMMERCIALICOMMERCTAL LIST]LrSTI IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OFOF A PLANPLAN OFOF'COMPROMISE COMPROMISE AND ARRANGEMENT OFOF' TARGET CANADA CO., TARGET CANADACANADA HEALTH CO., TARGET CANADA MOBILE GP CO., TARGET CANADACANADA PHARMACYPHARMACY (BC)(BC) CORP.,CORP., TARGETTARGET CANADACANADA PHARMACY (ONTARIO) CORP.,CORP., TARGETTARGET CANADACANADA PHARMACY CORP.,CORP., TARGETTARGET CANADA PHARMACY (SK)(sK) CORP.,coRP., and TARGET CANADA PROPERTY LLCLLc Applicants RESPONDING MOTION RECORD OF FAUBOURGF'AUBOURG BOISBRIAND SHOPPING CENTRE HOLDINGS INC. (Motion to Accept Filing ofof aa Plan andand Authorize Creditors'Creditorso MeetingMeeting toto VoteVote onon thethe Plan) (Returnable(Returnable DecemberDecemb er 21, 2015)201 5) Date: December 8,8,2015 2015 DE GRANDPRÉ CHAIT LLP Lawyers 10001000 DeDe.La La Gauchetière Street West Suite 2900 Montréal (Québec) H3B 4W5 Telephone: 514514 878-431187 8-4311 Fax:Fax:514 514 878-4333878-4333 Stephen M. Raicek [email protected]@,dgclex.com Matthew Maloley mmalole)¡@declex.commmaroleyedgclex.com Lawyers for FaubourgFaubourg Boisbriand Boisbriand Shopping Shopping Centre Holdings Inc. TO: SERVICE LIST CCAA Proceedings ofof TargetTarget CanadaCanada Co.etCo.et al,al, CourtCourt File No. CV-15-10832-00CLCV-l5-10832-00CL Main Service List (as(as atatDecember7,2015) December 7, 2015) PARTY CONTACTcqNTACT • OSLER,osLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of Shareholders and Management Proxy Circular
    NOTICE OF 2008 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR WHAT'S INSIDE NOTICE OF 2008 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING.......................................................................................2 MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR.......................................................................................................................3 VOTING YOUR SHARES ...........................................................................................................................................4 BUSINESS OF THE MEETING.................................................................................................................................10 THE NOMINATED DIRECTORS .............................................................................................................................12 STATEMENT OF GOVERNANCE PRACTICES.....................................................................................................21 COMMITTEES ...........................................................................................................................................................27 COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS...................................................................................31 REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BY THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE .............................................................................................................................................................37 PERFORMANCE GRAPHS.......................................................................................................................................41
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Location in the World System: Reworking
    CANADA’S LOCATION IN THE WORLD SYSTEM: REWORKING THE DEBATE IN CANADIAN POLITICAL ECONOMY by WILLIAM BURGESS BA (Hon.), Queens University, 1978 MA (Plan.), University of British Columbia, 1995 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Geography We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA January 2002 © William Burgess, 2002 Abstract Canada is more accurately described as an independent imperialist country than a relatively dependent or foreign-dominated country. This conclusion is reached by examining recent empirical evidence on the extent of inward and outward foreign investment, ownership links between large financial corporations and large industrial corporations, and the size and composition of manufacturing production and trade.
    [Show full text]
  • General Motors Corp
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549-1004 Form 10-Q þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-43 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) STATE OF DELAWARE 38-0572515 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 300 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48265-3000 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (313) 556-5000 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code NA (former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o (Do not check if smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
    [Show full text]
  • MONTRÉAL, June 22, 2007 ACE AVIATION HOLDINGS INC
    MONTRÉAL, June 22, 2007 ACE AVIATION HOLDINGS INC. PARTNERS WITH SAGEVIEW CAPITAL AND KKR ON ACTS Unless noted otherwise, all figures referred to in this press release are in Canadian dollars. ACE Aviation Holdings Inc. (ACE) announced today that it has agreed to sell a 70% interest in its wholly owned maintenance, repair and overhaul subsidiary ACTS LP (ACTS) to a consortium consisting of Sageview Capital LLC, a private investment firm, and KKR Private Equity Investors, L.P. (Euronext Amsterdam: KPE), the publicly traded fund of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (“KKR”). ACE will retain a 30% equity interest in ACTS and Air Canada will remain its largest customer. The transaction implies an enterprise value of approximately $975 million for 100% of ACTS on a cash and debt free basis. “This transaction is an important step in ACE’s strategy of unlocking the value in all of our businesses,” said Robert Milton, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ACE. “ACE’s retained 30% ownership of ACTS in partnership with Sageview and KKR is in line with our strategy of generating additional value for our shareholders by furthering the development of ACTS as a stand-alone, profitable entity. Among their many successes, KKR and Sageview have a track record of helping businesses that were once part of large conglomerates to become bigger, stronger and more competitive as independent organizations. Prime examples include Shoppers Drug Mart, Yellow Pages Group, and ITC, the former transmission business of Detroit Edison. They bring a long-term approach to creating lasting value, and together with them we believe great things will happen with ACTS.” “This investment brings us closer to our goal of establishing ACTS as the leading independent aircraft maintenance provider in the Americas,” said Chahram Bolouri, President and Chief Executive Officer of ACTS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Information Form
    2012 Annual Information Form March 22, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXPLANATORY NOTES ............................................................................................................................................................. - 2 - CORPORATE STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................................................................... - 3 - INTERCORPORATE RELATIONSHIP ....................................................................................................................................... - 4 - REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................................... - 5 - TRADEMARKS ............................................................................................................................................................................. - 11 - INDUSTRY OVERVIEW AND COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... - 12 - THE BUSINESS ........................................................................................................................................................................... - 17 - RISK FACTORS ........................................................................................................................................................................... - 41 - MARKET FOR SECURITIES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanography and Earth's Wicked Problems
    University of Northern Colorado Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC Earth & Atmospheric Sciences Faculty Publications Earth & Atmospheric Sciences 3-8-2019 Oceanography and Earth's Wicked Problems: In the Tradition of Franklin and Folger's Big Ideas: A Reflective Memoir About Life and Research by Practitioners in the 20th & 21st Centuries William Henry Hoyt University of Northern Colorado, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digscholarship.unco.edu/easfacpub Recommended Citation Hoyt, William Henry, "Oceanography and Earth's Wicked Problems: In the Tradition of Franklin and Folger's Big Ideas: A Reflective Memoir About Life and Research by Practitioners in the 20th & 21st Centuries" (2019). Earth & Atmospheric Sciences Faculty Publications. 1. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/easfacpub/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth & Atmospheric Sciences at Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Earth & Atmospheric Sciences Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OCEANOGRAPHY AND EARTH’S WICKED PROBLEMS In The Tradition of Franklin and Folger’s Big Ideas A reflective memoir about life and research by practitioners in the 20th & 21st Centuries By William Henry Hoyt, Ph D Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Northern Colorado Greeley, CO 80639 Frontispiece: SAILING SCHOOL VESSEL SSV WESTWARD, Sea Education Association, Woods Hole, MA. William Hoyt was Chief Scientist for Cruise W-156, Key West – Bermuda - Rum Cay - Key West, March to May, 1998 (photo by the author). “How inappropriate to call this planet Earth when it is clearly Ocean.” -Arthur C.
    [Show full text]
  • General Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) Employs Over 10,000 People Across the Country and Is a Recognized Leader in Green Manufacturing
    GM Communications General Motors Oshawa, Ontario of Canada Limited media.gm.ca GM Introduces Two Industry-First Safety Features Front centre air bag and camera-based collision alert system are designed to help protect occupants and avoid crashes Oshawa, ON (Friday, September 30, 2011) – General Motors will introduce the industry’s first front centre air bag and a camera-based collision alert system. The front centre air bag is an inflatable restraint designed to help protect drivers and front passengers in far-side impact crashes where the affected occupant is on the opposite, non-struck side of the vehicle. The front centre air bag will be available on the Buick Enclave, GMC Acadia, and Chevrolet Traverse midsize crossovers in the 2013 model year. The collision alert system uses a single camera to help drivers avoid front-end and unsignalled lane departure crashes and will be a feature offered on the 2012 GMC Terrain. About the Front Centre Air Bag: The front centre air bag deploys from the right side of the driver’s seat and positions itself between the front row seats near the center of the vehicle. This tethered, tubular air bag is designed to provide restraint during passenger-side crashes when the driver is the only front occupant, and also acts as an energy absorbing cushion between driver and front passenger in both driver- and passenger-side crashes. The air bag also is expected to provide benefit in rollovers. GM analysis of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System database, found that fatalities resulting from far-side impact crashes, where the occupant is on the non-struck side of the vehicle, represent 29% of all the belted front occupant fatalities in side impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination of Brexit and Ceta - Moving Vehicle Platforms from 1
    COMBINATION OF BREXIT AND CETA - MOVING VEHICLE PLATFORMS FROM 1 UK TO CANADA Combination of Brexit and CETA - Study on the Possibility of Motor Corporations Moving Vehicle Platforms from UK to Canada Junxi YU Engineering and Public Policy, McMaster University COMBINATION OF BREXIT AND CETA - MOVING VEHICLE PLATFORMS FROM 2 UK TO CANADA Abstract With the help from Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) signed in 2016, enormous opportunities and benefits have been created for the automotive industry in Canada. Specifically, European Union(EU) tariffs immediately eliminated on all Canadian auto parts that exported to EU. In the European market, UK has been a competitor to Canada in the automotive industry. After Brexit, without the benefits of free trade within EU, vehicles manufactured in the UK will start to lose their appeal in price gradually. In the thesis, a comparison on the current situation of five motor corporations in Canada and the corresponding motor corporations in the UK was made. It was found that only Honda Canada and Honda UK have an identical vehicle platform referred as Honda Civic platform, which produces same vehicle models, namely Honda Civic Type R and Honda CRV. On the contrast, the other four auto corporations don’t possess a same vehicle platform, producing same vehicle models in Canada and UK. A thorough analysis on Honda Motor Company was conducted. The total costs including vehicle price, shipping costs, tariff and currency exchange rate for EU consumers to purchase a car from the same platform in Canada and UK was calculated separately. By comparing the total costs of the two purchasing routes, the conclusion and recommendations was provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcnes Aug 20 2013
    A Spinoffs Study Applied to the Airline Industry by Erika Kutscher B.Sc., Engineering Sciences Universidad Cat6lica de Chile, 2006 Industrial Engineer with a diploma in Electrical Engineering Universidad Cat6lica de Chile, 2007 SUBMITTED TO THE SYSTEM DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Engineering and Management ARCNES at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITTE Massachusetts Institute of Technology OF TECHNOLOGY July 2012 AUG 20 2013 LIBRARIES ©2012 Erika Kutscher. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. / I A uth o r's sig nature ............................................................................... :............................................ Erika Kutscher System Design and Management Program C ertifie d by .................................................................................. Re Richard de Neufville Professor, neering Systems Division, MIT Thesis Syervisor A ccep ted b y ....................................................................................... .... .... ..V . OF Senior Lecturer, Engineering Systems Division Director, System Design and Management Program I (Page intentionally left blank) 2 A Spinoffs Study Applied to the Airline Industry by Erika Kutscher Submitted to the System Design and Management Program on July 24, 2012 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management Abstract Airlines have been recently debated the management of some of their non-core divisions, such as the Frequent Flyer Program (FFP).A spinoff is a form of corporate contraction that many companies have recently chosen. Through a spinoff, both the parent company and the divested subsidiary can each focus on their own activity, which translates into a better performance of both entities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standing Committee on Official Languages Has the Honour to Present Its
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES OTTAWA, CANADA K1A 0A6 The Standing Committee on Official Languages has the honour to present its FIRST REPORT Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(f), your Committee has considered the matter of the application of the Official Languages Act to ACE Aviation Holdings Inc. following the restructuring of Air Canada. A. Context Established by Parliament in 1937, Air Canada was a Crown corporation until 1988 when it was privatized. It was therefore subject to the provisions of the Official Languages Act (hereafter OLA), adopted in 1969, and its revised version of 1988. The Air Canada Public Participation Act (hereafter ACPPA) provided the framework for the sale of Air Canada shares held by the Government of Canada and defined the airline’s new obligations. This act stipulates that the head office must remain in Montreal, and section 10 clearly stipulates that the Official Languages Act applies to Air Canada after its privatization. Following its acquisition of regional carriers Air BC, Air Ontario and Air Nova in the late 1990s, Air Canada held a near monopoly, which led the federal government to amend the legislation. During this process, the Commissioner intervened a number of times to ask the government to clarify the application of the OLA to Air Canada’s new subsidiaries.1 Various amendments were made with the adoption in June 2000 of Bill C-26, which amended the ACPPA, by stipulating specific criteria relating to the application of the OLA to Air Canada. Bill C-26 confirmed in 2000 that Air Canada is subject to the OLA in its entirety.
    [Show full text]