arXiv:2003.10960v2 [gr-qc] 7 Apr 2020 h Bculn aaee ihms dimension with parameter coupling GB the where lows ‡ † ∗ in appears [ term equations GB higher field The add gravitational not the into does terms and derivative combinations ghost-free is term geodesics the to leads hole black a [ of incompleteness inner the at cating theory fundamental is more it be Therefore, GR. GR. should beyond prob- by there some interpreted that be still believed not are can used there that be can phenomena, lems and much powerful [ so explain is particles to GR of even accelerator that, note an should as act can hole a on stenx edn re em[ term order leading term next (GB) the Gauss-Bonnet approx- as the perturbation found of theories, was help these extension the of the With imation and theories. theory such superstring/M of pro- the been like have gravity posed, of theories quantum several larity, eetn hrces o xmls iaybakhole in- [ black of waves binary gravitational lots a produce have can solutions examples, holes system vacuum for black As characters, systems, derived teresting solutions. gravity result hole strong impressive black most of is the GR of geometry from One between relation matter. the and explain can (GR) ativity [email protected] orsodn author corresponding [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] ti elkonta h xsec fasnuaiylo- singularity a of existence the that known well is It stems ucsflgaiainlter,gnrlrel- general theory, gravitational successful most the As e aoaoyfrMgeimadMgei fteMnsr of Ministry the of Magnetic and Magnetism for Laboratory Key nttt fTertclPyis&Rsac etro Gravi of Center Research & Physics Theoretical of Institute pnigts atcei ordmninlEinstein-Gaus four-dimensional in particle test Spinning D stenme ftesaeiedimensions, spacetime the of number the is fasinn etpril ntebcgon ftebakhol black the of W background (2020)]. the 081301 in 124, parameter particle coupling Lett. test Bonnet Rev. spinning four-dim Phys. a novel Lin, of a C. in and Glavan hole [D. black symmetric spherically static iclri iia otecs ftefu-iesoa blac par four-dimensional numbers: the the PACS of of effect case the the that to find similar and is particle circular test separ investigate two spinning also We in the be of . can angular particle orbital such and means momentum which hole), black the S nti ae,w netgt h oino lsia spinn classical a of motion the investigate we paper, this In [GB] .INTRODUCTION I. 4 , 5 [ .T vroetepolmo singu- of problem the overcome To ]. g µν = ] D on eerhCne o hsc,LnhuUiest n Q and University Lanzhou Physics, for Center Research Joint dmninlsaeiea fol- as spacetime -dimensional Z omlUiest,Lnhu700 n iig800,China 810000, Xining and 730000 Lanzhou University, Normal d D x uPn Zhang Yu-Peng √ − gα α G snal naseilrange special a in nearly is 1 , 6 ,adablack a and ], 2 , , 7 3 ,adthis and ], .Btwe But ]. ∗ hoWnWei Shao-Wen , D − α (1) 8 4, is ]. eie,sc stevcu ae[ case vacuum the as such derived, h Bparameter GB the ag fteG opigprmtrfrtebakhole black of range the the for to parameter extended coupling was The GB solution studied. the of were of background hole the range black in EGB shadow four-dimensional and the particle test spinless a where lc oe ouin fG rvt in gravity GB of solutions holes Black eety .Gaa n .Ln[ Lin very C. However, and get. Glavan to mini- hard dy- D. four-dimensional is recently, gravitational gravity the GB that the coupled to mally to leads contributions which make namics, not does hsfu-iesoa G lc oehv enstudied been have of [ hole shadow in black and EGB stability four-dimensional The a this obtained. and black was graviton symmetric solution massless hole spherically the and does of static term properties four-dimensional invariant the GB affect the not gravity, EGB dimensional htbpse h oeoktermb dpiga art- an constant adopting coupling by theorem ful Lovelock the bypasses gravity that (EGB) Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet four-dimensional [ [ term case GB a with fields invariant GB the and e.Tesltoso hre lc oe[ [ hole charged black of solutions stud- The were ied. perturbations gravitational and tromagnetic, ftesao fterttn lc oe nprdby Inspired four- [ proposed hole. novel also are the black gravities gravity, Einstein-Lovelock rotating dimensional EGB the four-dimensional novel of the shadow the of eedn ntegoer ftecnrlbakhl.In hole. is black motion central [ the the of and Ref. geometry hole the black on central particle massive dependent a or hole around massless black a orbit a that can know around We particle test used. a be can of geodesics the of iors 17 ain azo nvriy azo 300 China 730000, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou tation, dcto,LnhuUiest,Lnhu700,China 730000, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Education, oudrtn h emtyo lc oe h behav- the hole, black a of geometry the understand To , 14 18 oei eea relativity. general in hole k 12 ,weeteqaiomlmdso clr elec- scalar, a of modes quasinormal the where ], † 19 M ]. − uXa Liu Yu-Xiao , ninlEnti-as-ontgravity Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet ensional .I ordmninlsaeie h Bterm GB the spacetime, four-dimensional In ]. ,teinrotsal iclrobt(SO of (ISCO) orbit circular stable innermost the ], 6 il pno h h nems stable innermost the the on spin ticle t riswt h aesi angular spin same the with orbits ate . stems ftebakhl.Cmae othe to Compared hole. black the of mass the is 1 a w iiawe h Gauss- the when minima two has e G 16 n etpril riigaon a around orbiting particle test ing h nems tbecrua orbits circular stable innermost the α/M < = n htteeetv potential effective the that find e eeas enotie,adcntan to constraint and obtained, been also were ] R µνρσ 2 α < a rtgvni e.[ Ref. in given first was R -ontBakHole Black s-Bonnet G ‡ α µνρσ − 10 sdfie as defined is inghai ( 2 , → 11 M − ,adat-eSte (AdS) Sitter anti-de and ], D 4 stems of mass the is α − R 4 µν nti oe four- novel this In . 13 R 9 ,Einstein-Maxwell ], rpsdanovel a proposed ] µν − D + 15 8 ≥ R n spinning and ] ≤ 2 aebeen have 5 16 . α/M nterms in ] 2 ≤ (2) 1, 2 case of a test particle in the background of a Schwarzchild where κ is the gravitational constant and will be set as black hole in GR, a positive GB coupling parameter re- κ2 =1/2 in this paper. The GB term does not contribute duces the radii of the ISCOs and a negative one enlarges to the dynamics of the four-dimensional spacetime be- them. There also appears Similar effect for a spinning cause it is a total derivative. Recently, by rescaling the test particle in the background of a black hole in GR, coupling parameter as where the spin-curvature 1 Rµ uν Sαβ also re- − 2 ναβ α duces or enlarges the corresponding radii of the ISCOs α , (4) → D 4 [20]. Inspired by the effects of the four-dimensional GB − term and the non-vanishing spin of a particle on the mo- and taking the limit D 4, Glaan and Lin [13] ob- tion of the test particle, it is necessary to investigate what tained the four-dimensional→ novel EGB gravity. The four- the total effects of them on the motion of a test particle dimensional static spherically symmetric black hole solu- in the four-dimensional EGB black hole. In this paper, tion was found [13] we will investigate the motion of a spinning test parti- cle in the background of the novel four-dimensional EGB dr2 black hole. For simplicity, we only consider the motion ds2 = f(r)dt2 + + r2dΩ2, (5) − f(r) of a spinning test particle in the equatorial plane. For a spinning test particle, its motion will not fol- r2 8αM f(r) = 1+ 1 1+ , (6) low the geodesics because of the spin-curvature force 2α − r3 µ r ! 1 R uν Sαβ. The equations of motion for the − 2 ναβ spinning test particle are described by the Mathisson- where M is the mass of the black hole and the coupling α Papapetrou-Dixon (MPD) equations [21–29] under the parameter 8 2 1 [19]. Solving f(r) = 0, one can µ M “pole-dipole” approximation, and the four-velocity u get two black− hole≤ horizons≤ and the four-momentum P µ are not parallel [25, 30] due µ to the spin-curvature force. The four-momentum P of 2 r± = M M α. (7) a spinning test particle keeps timelike along the trajec- ± − µ 2 tory (P Pµ = m , m is the mass of the test particle), p − In fact, the above solution (5-7) was also found in gravity in the contrary, the four-velocity would be superluminal with a conformal anomaly in Ref. [59] and was extended [25, 30] when the spin of the test particle is too large. to the case with a cosmological in Ref. [60]. Actually, this superluminal behavior comes from the ig- The motion of a spinning test particle is described by norance of the “multi-pole” effects. When such effects the MPD equations are considered, the superluminal problem can be avoided [31–35]. For the properties of the spinning test particle DP µ 1 = Rµ uνSαβ, (8) in different black hole backgrounds, see Refs. [20, 36–58]. Dλ −2 ναβ This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we use DSµν = P µuν uµP ν , (9) the MPD equation to obtain the four-momentum and Dλ − four-velocity of a spinning test particle in the novel four- dimensional EGB black hole background. In Sec. IIB, where P µ, Sµν , and uµ are the four-momentum, spin we study the motion of the spinning test particle and tensor, and tangent vector of the spinning test particle give the relations between the motion of the spinning along the trajectory, respectively. Note that the MPD test particle and the properties of the four-dimensional equations are not uniquely specified and we should use a EGB black hole. Finally, a brief summary and conclusion spin-supplementary condition to determine them. This are given in Sec. III. spin-supplementary condition is related to the of the spinning test particle with different observers [61–65]. In this paper, we choose the Tulczyjew spin- II. MOTION OF A SPINNING TEST PARTICLE supplementary condition [66]

IN FOUR-DIMENSIONAL EGB BLACK HOLE µν PµS =0, (10)

A. Four-momentum and four-velocity of the and the four-momentum P µ satisfies spinning test particle µ 2 P Pµ = m , (11) In this part, we will solve the equations of motion for a − spinning test particle in the novel four-dimensional EGB which makes sure that the spinning test particle keeps black hole background. timelike along the trajectory. The action of the D-dimensional EGB gravity is de- For the equatorial motion of the spinning test par- scribed by ticle with spin-aligned or anti-aligned orbits, the four- momentum and spin tensor should satisfy P θ = 0 and 1 Sθµ = 0. The non-vanishing independent variables for S = dDx√ g R + α , (3) − 2κ2 G the equatorial orbits are P t, P r, P φ, and Srφ. After Z   3 adopting the spin-supplementary condition (10), we have Solving Eqs. (11), (17), and (18), we get the non- [26] vanishing components of the four-momentum: 2 3 ¯ 2 ¯ 3 rt rφ Pφ φt rφ Pr m α 2¯er ∆+2jM s¯ jMr s¯(∆ 1) S = S , S = S . (12) Pt = − − , (19) − P P − α (2r3∆+2Ms¯2) r3s¯2 (∆ 1) t t − −  2αm2r3∆(¯jM e¯s¯) Substituting Eq. (12) into the following equation Pφ = − , (20) α (2r3∆+2Ms¯2) r3s¯2 (∆ 1) − − 1 s2 = Sµν S = SφrS + StrS + StφS , (13) and 2 µν φr tr tφ 2 φφ 2 φt tt 2 r 2 m + g Pφ +2g PφPt + g Pt and using Eq. (11), we get the r φ component of spin (P ) = , (21) − grr tensor − 8αM where the function ∆ = 1+ 3 . We can solve the rφ s Pt r S = . (14) µ −r m four-velocity u by using theq equations of motion (8) and (9) and the components of Sµν in (15)[56, 67] The non-vanishing components of the spin tensor Sµν in tr the four-dimensional EGB black hole background are DS t r s¯ µ ν αβ s¯ = P r˙ P = gφµR u S + Pφr,˙ (22) Dλ − 2r ναβ r2 s Pt tφ Srφ = Sφr = , DS t φ s¯ µ ν αβ s¯ = P φ˙ P = grµR u S Prr.˙ (23) . − −r m Dλ − −2r ναβ − r2 rt tr rφ Pφ s Pφ S = S = S = , (15) Finally, the non-vanishing components of the four- − − Pt r m velocity are obtained as P s P Sφt = Stφ = Srφ r = r , − P −r m b c b c t r˙ = 2 1 − 1 2 , (24) a2b1 a1b2 where the parameter s is the spin angular momentum of − a2c1 a1c2 the test particle and the spin direction is perpendicular φ˙ = − , (25) a b a b to the equatorial plane. 1 2 − 2 1 Due to the existence of the spin-curvature coupling where the functions a1, b1, c1, a2, b2, and c2 are defined term, the conserved quantities of the spinning test par- as ticle are modified. The relation between a killing vector µ t s¯ s¯ νµ field and the conserved quantity is [25, 26] a1 = P Pφ + Rφrµν S , (26) K − r2 2r s¯ νµ µ 1 µν b1 = Rφφµν S , (27) = Pµ S µ;ν , (16) 2r C K − 2 K r s¯ νµ c1 = P + Rφtµν S , (28) where the semicolon denotes the covariant derivative. In − 2r the EGB black hole with the metric (5), there are two sP¯ r s¯ νµ µ µ a2 = 2 Rrrµν S , (29) Killing vectors, a timelike ξ = (∂t) and a spacelike r − 2r µ µ η = (∂φ) , from which we can get two conserved quan- t s¯ νµ b = P Rrφµν S , (30) tities [26] 2 − 2r φ s¯ νµ c2 = P Rrtµν S . (31) µ 1 µν − − 2r me¯ = t = ξ Pµ + S ξµ ν −C − 2 ; We can set the affine parameter λ as coordinate time and 1 s¯ 1 s¯ t = Pt + Pt∂rgtφ Pφ∂rgtt, (17) choose u = 1 because the trajectories of the test particle − 2 r − 2 r are independent of the affine parameter λ [24, 65]. Then µ 1 µν m¯j = φ = η Pµ S ηµ ν the orbital frequency parameter Ω of the test particle is C − 2 ; 1 s¯ 1 s¯ uφ = Pφ + Pφ∂rgφt Pt∂rgφφ. (18) Ω = φ.˙ (32) 2 r − 2 r ≡ ut e ¯ j Here the parameters are defined ase ¯ = m , j = m , and s B. Properties of a spinning particle in circular s¯ = m , with e, m, and j the energy, mass, and total angular momentum of the spinning test particle, respec- orbits µν tively. Note that we have used the relations S ξµ;ν = µν β µν µν β S ξ ∂ν gβµ and S ηµ;ν = S η ∂ν gβµ for the two The motion of a test particle in a central field can be Killing vectors. solved in terms of the radial coordinate in the Newtonian 4 dynamics [68, 69]. We can use the same way to simplify momentum P r, therefore the effective potential of the the motion of a test particle in the black hole background spinning test particle can be solved by using the form of by using the effective potential method in general rela- P r (21)[53]. We decompose the (P r)2 (21) as [42, 53] tivity. The radial velocity ur is parallel to the radial

r 2 2 2 (P ) 2 B + √B 4AC B + √B 4AC 2 = Ae¯ + Be¯ + C e¯ − − e¯ + − , (33) m ∝ − 2A ! 2A !  where the functions A, B, and C are

A = 2 −1αm2r 8αM + r3 r2s¯2(∆ 1)+2α r2 s¯2 , (34) E − −   B = 8 −1α2¯jm2Mrs¯ 3Mr 2∆+8αM + r3 ,  (35) E − and 

C = 2m2 (α )−1 16α4Mr ¯j2M 2 + r2 + α3 2¯j2M 2 4Mr3(1 ∆) M 2s¯2 + r4 +4Mr3s¯2 (∆ 4) − E − − − (    +Mr5 (8 8∆)+2M 2s¯2 s¯2 8r2 +2r6 + α2 ¯j2M 2r3 2Ms¯2 (∆ 3)+ r3 (1 ∆) − − − −      M 2r2s¯4 (∆ 9) 2Mr3s¯4 (∆ 3) + r8 (1 ∆)+2r6s¯2 (∆ 1)+2Mr5s¯2 (5∆ 9) − − − − − − −  +αr5s¯2 ¯j2M 2r (∆ 1)+ rs¯2 (1 ∆) 4Ms¯2 (∆ 2)+ r3 (2∆ 2) + r8s¯4 ((1 ∆)) , (36) − − − − − −   )

where the function is effects on the motion of a spinning test particle can be de- E 2 rived based on how the effective potential depends on the = r3s¯2 (∆ 1) 2α r3∆+ Ms¯2 . (37) E − − GB coupling parameter α and the spin angular momen- tums ¯. We plot some shapes of the effective potential (38) The effective potential of the test particle is defined by in Fig. 1. We can see that the radii of the extreme points the positive square root of Eq. (33) become smaller when the coupling parameter α> 0 and B + √B2 4AC become larger when the parameter α < 0. These phe- V spin = − − (38) nomena mean that a positive GB coupling parameter in- eff 2A duces the attractive effect and a negative one results in The positive square root corresponds to the four- the repulsive effect on the motion of the test particle. momentum pointing toward future, while the negative In addition to the attractive or repulsive effects on the one corresponds to the past-pointing four-momentum motion of the test particle, some more interesting results [70]. When the spin of the test particle is zero, it re- are found when we check the shapes of the effective po- duces to tential in the parameter space (¯s ¯j). We find that the effective potential has two minima− when the GB coupling r2 8αM ¯j2 parameter α is in a special range. When the test parti- V = 1+ 1 1+ 1+ eff v 3 2 cle move in stable circular orbits [53], the radial velocity u 2α − r r !r r u should be zero t ¯j2 = f(r) 1+ . (39) dr r2 =0, (40) s   dλ Note that for the four-dimensional Schwarzchild black and the the radial vanishes 2M hole in GR, the function f(r)=1 r . − 2 2 The properties of a test particle in a central field are d r dVeff d Veff =0, = 0 and > 0 . (41) mainly determined by the effective potential. Thus, the dλ2 dr dr2   5

2 dVeff d Veff The conditions dr = 0 and dr2 > 0 mean that the potential merge. Thus, the effective potential of the test energy of the particle should equal to the minimum of particle at the ISCO should satisfy the effective potential. d2V Therefore, when the effective potential of a spinning eff =0. (43) test particle has two minima, there will be two stable dr2 circular orbits for the particle with a spin angular mo- By using Eqs. (40), (41), and (43), we can derive the mentum and an orbital angular momentum. This is a ISCO of the test particle. In Ref. [19], the authors new feature for the motion of a spinning test particle in showed that the radius of the ISCO for a spinless test four-dimensional EGB black hole background. We plot particle varies in the form of the effective potential with two minima in Fig. 2, where the corresponding two separate orbits of the spinning test 11 ¯ rISCO =6M α + (α). (44) particle withs ¯ =0.3 and j = 5 are still given. − 18 O The spinning test particle with with the same spins ¯ and the same angular momentum can posses two stable This result was derived under the linear approach with a circular orbits only happens in the case of α< 0 with a small α around 0. Obviously, the ISCO of a spinless test special range for α. We give the numerical results in Fig. particle can be larger or smaller due to the existence of 3 and find that the range of α/M 2 is nearly in ( 6.1, 2). the GB term. This phenomenon is consistent with the We have mentioned that the MPD equations− of− the behavior of the effective potential, see the subfigure (a) spinning test particle is obtained under the “pole-dipole” in Fig. 1. approximation, which will lead to the four-velocity trans- When the test particle possesses a non-vanishing spin, form from timelike to spacelike if the particle spin is too the contribution of the spin-curvature force should affect large. In order to make sure the motion of the spinning the properties of the motion. The relation between the test particle is timelike, we adopt the superluminal con- effective potential and the spin of the test particle is still straint [42] shown in Fig. 1. We give the numerical results of the ISCO in Fig. 5. Note that, there is a jump behavior uµu g r˙ 2 φ˙ 2 for the ISCO parameters in the subfigure (e) in Fig. 5, µ = tt + g + g +2g φ<˙ 0. (42) (ut)2 c2 rr c φφ c φt which is induced by the fact that the effective potential     has two minima. Because we use the position where the By using the superluminal constraint and circular orbit maximum and minimum of the effective potential merge conditions (40) and (41) for the spinning test particle, we to locate the ISCO and our step length of spin is not small obtain the parameter space (¯s l) in Fig. 4, which de- enough to cover the change of the ISCO parameters. We − scribes whether the motion on a circular orbit is timelike summarize how the ISCO of the spinning test particle or spacelike. We can compare the results in Fig. 3 and depends on the spins ¯ and GB coupling parameter α as in Fig. 4 to check whether the motion of the spinning follows: test particle is timelike. We confirm that the motion of the particle with the same spin and the same total an- For the ISCO of the spinning test particle in four- • gular momentum that can move in two separate orbits is dimensional EGB black hole, the corresponding ra- timelike. We have known that the effects from the GB dius and angular momentum decrease with the spin term on the motion of the test particle can be attractive s¯ when the GB coupling parameter α is fixed. And or repulsive, where a positive GB coupling parameter α when the effect from the GB term is considered, the leads to an attractive force and a negative one results spinning test particle can orbit at more smaller ra- in a repulsive force. The spin-curvature force can also dius of the ISCO than the case of the Schwarzchild be attractive or repulsive. The same directions of the black hole in GR, and the Gauss-Bonnet term does spin angular momentum and orbital angular momentum not change the laws of the ISCO with spin. of the spinning test particle will lead to attractive spin- When the spin of the test particle is fixed, the ra- curvature force, wile the opposite direction will lead a re- • dius and angular momentum of the ISCO decrease pulsive force. When the effects induced by the GB term with the GB coupling parameter and this behavior and spin-curvature force exist simultaneously, the total is almost the same as the results of the spinless case attractive or negative force will be enhanced or weakened. in Ref. [19]. Then it will change the shapes of the regions in (¯l ¯j). − Thus, when the GB coupling parameter α > 0, the at- When the spin of the spinning particle and GB cou- tractive effects will lead to disappearance of the parts of • pling parameter are in the region ofs ¯ ¯j that the the top left and bottom right of the region (II). While particle can have two separate orbits,− the radius for the case of α < 0, the repulsive effects will result in and angular momentum of the ISCO will become disappearance of the parts of the top right and bottom more smaller than the case of the spinless test par- left of the region (II). ticle in the EGB black hole [19] or the case of the Next we will investigate the ISCO of the spinning test spinning test particle in the Schwarzchild black hole particle. The ISCO of the test particle locates at the po- in GR [42]. sition where the maximum and minimum of the effective 6

FIG. 1: The effective potential for a spinning test particle in the four-dimensional EGB black hole background. The parameters are set as M = 1 and m = 1.

FIG. 2: Plots of the effective potential and orbits for a spinning test particle withs ¯ = 0.3, ¯j = 5, and α = −6. The subfigures (b) and (c) are the two minima of the effective potential shown in the subfigure (a). The subfigures (e) and (f) are two separate orbits around the two minima of the effective potential shown in the subfigure (d), and they are related to the effective potential in the subfigures (b) and (c). The values of the red dashed line in the subfigures (b) and (c) stand for the energy of the test particle. And the range of the red dashed in the radial direction stands for the radial range that the test particle can move in, see the corresponding orbits in subfigures (e) and (f). The test particles on the two orbits have the same spin and orbital angular momentum. The parameters are set as M = 1 and m = 1.

III. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION dimensional novel EGB black hole. We solved the four-

In this paper, we investigated the motion of a spin- ning test particle in the equatorial plane of the four- 7

FIG. 3: Plots of the parameter space (¯s − ¯j) describing whether a spinning test particle can move in two circular orbits with the same spins ¯ and the same total angular momentum ¯j. The vertical axis is the spin parameter in the range ofs ¯ ∈ (0.2, 1.2), and the horizontal axis is the total angular momentum ¯j in the range of ¯j ∈ (0, 10). The other parameters are set as M = 1 and m = 1. In the black and blue regions, the effective potential has two minima (corresponding to two stable circular orbits) and one minimum (corresponding to one stable circular orbit), respectively. In the gray and yellow regions, the test particle has no stable circular orbits. momentum and four-velocity of the particle and inves- bits and confirmed that the motion of the spinning test tigated how its motion depends on the four-dimensional particle that can move at two seperate orbits is timelike. GB term and particle’s spin. We found that the ISCO of the spinning test particle has the similar behavior as the case of a spinning test particle in . And the GB term and spin parameters ¯ can make the radii IV. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS of the ISCO become larger or smaller. The new feature for the motion of the spinning test particle is that it can move at two separate orbits with the same spins ¯ and This work was supported in part by the National Nat- same total angular momentum ¯j when the GB coupling ural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11875151, parameter α is in a special range of 6.1 < α/M 2 < 2. No. 11705070, No. 11522541, and No. 11675064), Y.P. We also gave the superluminal constraint− on the four-− Zhang was supported by the scholarship granted by the velocity of the spinning test particle in the circular or- Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC).

[1] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and larities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965). Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 [5] S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, The Singularities of grav- (2016); Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016); Phys. Rev. itational collapse and cosmology, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017); Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 A 314, 529 (1970). (2017); Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017). [6] D. J. Gross and E. Witten, Superstring Modifications of [2] M. Banados, J. Silk, and S. M. West, Kerr Black Holes Einstein’s Equations, Nucl. Phys. B 277, 1 (1986); D. J. as Particle Accelerators to Arbitrarily High Energy, Phys. Gross and J. H. Sloan, The Quartic Effective Action for Rev. Lett. 103, 111102 (2009), arXiv:0909.0169 [hep-th]. the Heterotic String, Nucl. Phys. B 291, 41 (1987). [3] S.-W. Wei, Y.-X. Liu, H. Guo, and C.-E. Fu, Charged [7] M. C. Bento and O. Bertolami, Maximally Symmetric spinning black holes as Particle Accelerators, Phys. Rev. Cosmological Solutions of higher curvature string effec- D 82, 103005 (2010), arXiv:1006.1056 [hep-th]. tive theories with dilatons, Phys. Lett. B 368, 198 (1996), [4] R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singu- arXiv:gr-qc/9503057. 8

FIG. 4: Properties of circular orbits for the spinning test particle in the four-dimensional GB black hole background. The vertical axis is the spin parameter in the range ofs ¯ ∈ (−8, 8), and the horizontal axis is the orbital angular momentum ¯l = ¯j − s¯ in the range of ¯l ∈ (−8, 8). The other parameters are set as M = 1 and m = 1. In the gray region (I) in the l − s space, the test particle can have timelike circular orbits. In the red region (II) and yellow region (III), the test particle does not have stable timelike circular orbits. In the region (III), the motion of the test particle is spacelike and unphysical.

[8] B. Zwiebach, Curvature Squared Terms and String The- [17] R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Black holes in the four- ories, Phys. Lett. B, 156, 315 (1985). dimensional Einstein-Lovelock gravity, arXiv:2003.07788 [9] D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, String-generated gravity [gr-qc]. models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2656 (1985). [18] A. Casalino, A. Colleaux, M. Rinaldi, and S. Vicentini, [10] D. L. Wiltshire, Spherically symmetric solutions of Regularized Lovelock gravity, arXiv:2003.07068 [gr-qc]. Einstein-Maxwell theory with a Gauss-Bonnet term, [19] M.-Y. Guo and P.-C. Li, The innermost stable circular Physics Letters B, 169, 36 (1986). orbit and shadow in the novel 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet [11] D. L. Wiltshire, Black holes in string-generated gravity gravity, arXiv: 2003.02523 [gr-qc]. models, Phys. Rev. D, 38, 2445 (1988). [20] S. Suzuki and K. Maeda, Innermost stable circular orbit [12] R.-G. Cai, Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces, Phys. of a spinning particle in Kerr space-time, Phys. Rev. D Rev. D 65, 084014 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0109133. 58, 023005 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9712095. [13] D. Glavan and C. Lin, Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity [21] M. Mathisson, New mechanics of material systems, Acta in Four-Dimensional Spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, Phys. Pol. 6, 163 (1937). 081301 (2020), arXiv:1905.03601 [gr-qc]. [22] A. Papapetrou, Spinning test-particles in general relativ- [14] R. A. Konoplya and A. F. Zinhailo, Quasinormal modes, ity. I, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 209, 248 (1951). stability and shadows of a black hole in the novel 4D [23] E. Corinaldesi and A. Papapetrou, Spinning test-particles Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, arXiv:2003.01188 [gr-qc]. in general relativity. II, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 209, 259 [15] P. G. S. Fernandes, Charged Black Holes in AdS (1951). Spaces in 4D Einstein Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, arXiv: [24] W. G. Dixon, Dynamics of extended bodies in general 2003.05491[gr-qc]. relativity II. Moments of the charge-current vector, Proc. [16] S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, Testing the nature of Gauss- R. Soc. Lond. A 314, 499 (1970). Bonnet gravity by four-dimensional rotating black hole [25] S. A. Hojman, PhD thesis, Princeton University (1975) shadow, arXiv: 2003.07769 [gr-qc]. (unpublished). 9

FIG. 5: The ISCO parameters of the spinning test particle with different values of α. The parameters are set as M = 1 and m = 1.

[26] R. Hojman and S. Hojman, Spinning Charged Test Par- Fields, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 1376016 (2016), ticles in a Kerr-Newman Background, Phys. Rev. D 15, arXiv:1511.00645 [gr-qc]. 2724 (1977). [33] W. G. Ram´ırez and A. A. Deriglazov, Relativistic effects [27] B. Mashhoon and D. Singh, Dynamics of Extended Spin- due to gravimagnetic moment of a rotating body, Phys. ning in a Gravitational , Phys. Rev. D 74, Rev. D 96, 124013 (2017), arXiv:1709.06894 [gr-qc]. 124006 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608278. [34] A. A. Deriglazov and W. G. Ram´ırez, Recent progress [28] N. Zalaquett, S. A. Hojman, and F. A. Asenjo, Spinning on the description of relativistic spin: vector model of massive test particles in cosmological and general static spinning particle and rotating body with gravimagnetic spherically symmetric spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. moment in General Relativity, Adv. Math. Phys. 2017, 31, 085011 (2014), arXiv:1308.4435 [gr-qc]. 7397159 (2017), arXiv:1710.07135 [gr-qc]. [29] R. Uchupol, J. V. Sarah, and A. H. Scott, Gyroscopes or- [35] J. Steinhoff and D. Puetzfeld, Multipolar equations of mo- biting black holes: A frequency-domain approach to pre- tion for extended test bodies in general relativity, Phys. cession and spin-curvature coupling for spinning bodies Rev. D 81, 044019 (2010), arXiv:0909.3756 [gr-qc]. on generic Kerr orbits , Phys. Rev. D 94, 044008 (2016), [36] W.-B. Han, Gravitational Radiations from a Spinning arXiv:1512.00376 [gr-qc]. Compact Object around a supermassive Kerr black hole [30] C. Armaza, M. Banados, and B. Koch, Collisions of spin- in circular orbit, Phys. Rev. D 82, 084013 (2010), ning massive particles in a Schwarzschild background, arXiv:1008.3324 [gr-qc]. Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 105014 (2016), arXiv:1510.01223 [37] E. Harms, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, S. Bernuzzi, and [gr-qc]. A. Nagar, Spinning test body orbiting around a [31] A. A. Deriglazov and W. G. Ram´ırez, Mathisson- Schwarzschild black hole: Circular dynamics and Papapetrou-Tulczyjew-Dixon (MPTD) equations in ultra- gravitational-wave fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104010 relativistic regime and gravimagnetic moment, Int. J. (2016), arXiv:1609.00356 [gr-qc]. Mod. Phys. D 26, 1750047 (2016), arXiv:1509.05357 [gr- [38] G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, E. Harms, S. Bernuzzi, and A. qc]. Nagar, Spinning test-body orbiting around a Kerr black [32] A. A. Deriglazov and W. G. Ram´ırez, Ultrarelativis- hole: circular dynamics and gravitational-wave fluxes , tic Spinning Particle and a Rotating Body in External Phys. Rev. D 96, 064051 (2017), arXiv:1707.07537 [gr- 10

qc]. arXiv:1910.11565 [gr-qc]. [39] S. Mukherjee and K. Rajesh Nayak, Off-equatorial stable [55] U. Nucamendi, R. Becerril, and P. Sheoran, Bounds on circular orbits for spinning particles , Phys. Rev. D 98, spinning particles in their innermost stable circular orbits 084023 (2018), arXiv:1804.06070 [gr-qc]. around rotating braneworld black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C [40] M. Zhang and W.-B. Liu, Innermost stable circular orbits 80, 35 (2020), arXiv:1910.00156 [gr-qc]. of charged spinning test particles, Phys. Lett. B 789, 393 [56] Y.-P. Zhang, B.-M. Gu, S.-W. Wei, and J. Yang, and (2019), arXiv:1812.10115 [gr-qc]. Y.-X. Liu, Charged spinning black holes as accelerators [41] D. Pugliese, H. Quevado, and R. Ruffini, Equatorial of spinning particles, Phys. Rev. D 94, 124017 (2016), circular orbits of neutral test particles in the Kerr arXiv:1608.08705 [gr-qc]. Newman spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 88, 024042 (2013), [57] C. Conde and C. Galvis, Properties of the Innermost Sta- arXiv:1303.6250 [gr-qc]. ble Circular Orbit of a spinning particle moving in a ro- [42] Y.-P. Zhang, S.-W. Wei, W.-D. Guo, T.-T. Sui, and Y.-X. tating Maxwell-dilaton black hole background, Phys. Rev. Liu, Innermost stable circular orbit of spinning particle D 99, 104059 (2019), arXiv:1905.01323 [gr-qc]. in charged spinning black hole background, Phys. Rev. D [58] Y.-L. Liu and X.-D. Zhang, Maximal efficiency of the 97, 084056 (2018), arXiv:1711.09361 [gr-qc]. collisional Penrose process with spinning particles in [43] Z. Stuchl´ık, Equilibrium of spinning test particles in the Kerr-Sen black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 31 (2020), Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetimes, Acta Physica Slo- arXiv:1910.01872 [gr-qc]. vaca. 49, 319 (1999). [59] R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, and N. Ohta, Black Holes [44] Z. Stuchl´ık and J. Kov´a, Equilibrium conditions of spin- in Gravity with Conformal Anomaly and Logarithmic ning test particles in Kerr-de Sitter spacetimes , Class. Term in Black Hole Entropy, JHEP 1004, 082 (2010), Quant. Grav. 23, 3935 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0611153. arXiv:0911.4379 [hep-th]. [45] R. Plyatsko, M. Fenyk, and V. Panat, Highly relativistic [60] R.-G. Cai, Thermodynamics of Conformal Anomaly Cor- spin-gravity-Λ coupling, Phys. Rev. D 96, 064038 (2017), rected Black Holes in AdS Space, Phys. Lett. B 733, 183 arXiv:1711.04270 [gr-qc]. (2014), arXiv:1405.1246[hep-th]. [46] R. Plyatsko, V. Panat, and M. Fenyk, Nonequatorial cir- [61] R. M. Wald, Gravitational spin interaction, Phys. Rev. cular orbits of spinning particles in the Schwarzschild- D 6, 406 (1972). de Sitter background, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50, 150 (2018), [62] G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, J. Seyrich, and D. Kunst, Inves- arXiv:1811.01391 [gr-qc]. tigating spinning test particles: spin supplementary con- [47] W.-B. Han, Dynamics of extended bodies with spin- ditions and the Hamiltonian formalism, Phys. Rev. D 90, induced quadrupole in Kerr spacetime: generic orbits, 104019 (2014), arXiv:1409.4314 [gr-qc]. Gen. Rel. Grav. 49, 48 (2017), arXiv:1611.07602 [gr-qc]. [63] L. Filipe O. Costa, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and Oldˇrich [48] N. Warburton, T. Osburn, and C. R. Evans, Evolution Semer´ak, On spinning particles in general relativity: of small-mass-ratio binaries with a spinning secondary, momentum-velocity relation for the Mathisson-Pirani Phys. Rev. D 96, 084057 (2017), arXiv:1708.03720 [gr- spin condition, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084023 (2018), qc]. arXiv:1712.07281 [gr-qc]. [49] Y. Liu and W.-B. Liu, Energy extraction of a spinning [64] G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, E. Harms, S. Bernuzzi, and A. particle via the super Penrose process from an extremal Nagar, Spinning test-body orbiting around a Kerr black Kerr black hole , Phys. Rev. D 97, 064024 (2018). hole: circular dynamics and gravitational-wave fluxes, [50] S. Mukherjee, Gravitational Radiations from a Spinning Phys. Rev. D 96, 064051 (2017), arXiv:1707.07537 [gr- Compact Object around a supermassive Kerr black hole qc]. in circular orbit, Phys. Lett. B 778, 54 (2018). [65] G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Time parameterizations and [51] G. Faye, L. Blanchet, and A. Buonanno, Higher-order spin supplementary conditions of the Mathisson- spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. I. Papapetrou-Dixon equations, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104023 Equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D 74, 104033 (2006), (2017), arXiv:1709.08942 [gr-qc]. arXiv:gr-qc/0605139. [66] W. Tulczyjew, Acta Phys. Pol. 18, 393 (1959). [52] V. Witzany, J. Steinhoff, and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, [67] S. A. Hojman and F. A. Asenjo, Can gravitation accel- Hamiltonians and canonical coordinates for spinning par- erate neutrinos? Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 025008 (2013), ticles in curved space-time, Class. Quantum Grav. 36 arXiv:1203.5008 [physics.gen-ph]. 075003 (2019), arXiv:1808.06582 [gr-qc]. [68] S. A. Kaplan, JETP, 19, 951 (1949). [53] P. I. Jefremov, O. Yu. Tsupko, and G. S. Bisnovatyi- [69] L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Kogan, Innermost stable circular orbits of spinning test Fields. Pergamon, Oxford (1993). particles in Schwarzschild and Kerr space-times , Phys. [70] C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravi- Rev. D 91, 124030 (2015), arXiv:1503.07060 [gr-qc]. tation (Freeman, New York, 1973), p. 911. [54] B. Toshmatov and D. Malafarina, Spinning test particle in the γ space-times, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104052 (2019),