DOCSLIB.ORG

Strengthening Reemployment in the Unemployment Insurance System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strengthening Reemployment in the Unemployment Insurance System DISCUSSION PAPER 2015-02 | MARCH 2015 Strengthening Reemployment in the Unemployment Insurance System Adriana Kugler The Hamilton Project • Brookings 1 ADVISORY COUNCIL MISSION STATEMENT The Hamilton Project seeks to advance America’s promise of opportunity, prosperity, and growth. We believe that today’s increasingly competitive global economy demands public policy ideas commensurate with the challenges of the 21st Century. The Project’s economic strategy reflects a judgment that long-term prosperity is best achieved by fostering economic growth and broad participation in that growth, by enhancing individual economic security, and by embracing a role for effective government in making needed public investments. Our strategy calls for combining public investment, a secure social safety net, and fiscal discipline. In that framework, the Project puts forward innovative proposals from leading economic thinkers — based on credible evidence and experience, not ideology or doctrine — to introduce new and effective policy options into the national debate. The Project is named after Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first Treasury Secretary, who laid the foundation for the modern American economy. Hamilton stood for sound fiscal policy, believed that broad-based opportunity for advancement would drive American economic growth, and recognized that “prudent aids and encouragements on the part of government” are necessary to enhance and guide market forces. The guiding principles of the Project remain consistent with these views. 2 Informing Students about Their College Options: A Proposal for Broadening the Expanding College Opportunities Project Strengthening Reemployment in the Unemployment Insurance System Adriana Kugler Georgetown University MARCH 2015 NOTE: This discussion paper is a proposal from the author(s). As emphasized in The Hamilton Project’s original strategy paper, the Project was designed in part to provide a forum for leading thinkers across the nation to put forward innovative and potentially important economic policy ideas that share the Project’s broad goals of promoting economic growth, broad-based participation in growth, and economic security. The author(s) are invited to express their own ideas in discussion papers, whether or not the Project’s staff or advisory council agrees with the specific proposals. This discussion paper is offered in that spirit. The Hamilton Project • Brookings 1 Abstract Helping unemployed workers return to work has long been a policy challenge in the United States, and the urgency of the problem tends to increase during and after economic downturns. Immediately after the Great Recession the average duration of unemployment reached forty weeks, and even by the end of 2014 the average duration of unemployment remained above thirty weeks—higher than the worst it had been during previous periods of recession. Such spells of long-term unemployment impose enormous costs on individuals, their families, and the economy as a whole; the longer an individual is out of work, the harder it is for her to find new employment. While the unemployment insurance system is structured to provide benefits to unemployed workers while they search for work, many of its eligibility requirements can effectively discourage a large number of unemployed workers from pursuing job opportunities that may be to their advantage. This paper offers three pilot programs to reform the unemployment system by encouraging different ways to return to work. The first program would allow the unemployed to continue claiming benefits while receiving entrepreneurial training and other assistance for setting up a business. The second program would support the unemployed through temporary positions and internships that might lead to full-time jobs. The third program would provide partial benefits to claimants who accept part-time jobs. By helping the unemployed transition back to work, these programs have the potential to break the cycle of long-term unemployment before it starts. 2 Strengthening Reemployment in the Unemployment Insurance System Table of Contents ABSTRACT 2 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 5 CHAPTER 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR RECEIVING UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 8 CHAPTER 3. PROPOSAL: SELF-EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE 13 CHAPTER 4. PROPOSAL: BRIDGE-TO-WORK PROGRAMS 18 CHAPTER 5. PROPOSAL: UNDER-EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE 22 CHAPTER 6. QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS 25 CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION 28 CHAPTER 8. APPENDIX 29 AUTHOR AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 32 ENDNOTES 33 REFERENCES 34 The Hamilton Project • Brookings 3 4 Strengthening Reemployment in the Unemployment Insurance System Chapter 1. Introduction period of unemployment, whether short or long for example, the unemployment rate does not reveal how term, imposes significant costs on unemployed long people were unemployed. Figure 1b shows the average workers and their households. The longer the spell of duration of unemployment. After past recessions the duration Aunemployment, the more difficult it becomes for a household of unemployment rose to about twenty weeks at its worst. to cope with these costs, both financially and in terms of But after the Great Recession the duration of unemployment mental and physical health. This discussion paper proposes climbed to forty weeks. Even by the end of 2014 the average three ways to help the unemployed transition back to work and duration of unemployment remained above thirty weeks— thereby reduce the risk of long-term unemployment. These higher than the worst it had been during previous periods of proposals emphasize the importance of removing hurdles recession. Figure 1c shows the percentage of the unemployed currently built into the unemployment insurance (UI) system who have been without a job for more than twenty-six weeks, and of introducing a combination of incentives and services which is the standard definition of long-term unemployment. so that the unemployed can return to work more quickly. The After past recessions, the share of the unemployed who were first proposal is to conduct pilot programs in five states to long-term unemployed climbed to the range of 20–25 percent, adopt Self-Employment Assistance (SEA), which would allow but after the Great Recession this share rose to 45 percent, the unemployed to continue to claim unemployment benefits and even by the end of 2014 it had only fallen to 30 percent. while receiving entrepreneurial training and other support The long-term nature of recent U.S. unemployment is one for setting up a business. The second proposal is to conduct reason that the costs of being unemployed are higher than the Bridge-to-Work (BTW) pilot programs in five states so that the standard unemployment rate measure would suggest. unemployed can continue to claim benefits while returning to work through a direct placement with an employer, and to The most salient costs of unemployment—especially long- provide a bonus to employers who hire the unemployed and term unemployment—are economic losses. During the Great retain them for an established period. The third proposal Recession and its aftermath, for example, many long-term is to conduct Under-Employment Assistance (UEA) pilot unemployed workers saw their family income fall by 40 percent. programs in five states to test the importance of allowing the They were twice as likely to experience poverty as workers who unemployed to continue to claim partial benefits when they get had been unemployed for shorter periods of time, and almost a part-time job or a job that pays less than their previous job. four times as likely to experience poverty as workers who To select states for participation in these pilot programs, the had never been unemployed (Nichols, Mitchell, and Linder U.S. Department of Labor would evaluate applications from 2013). Historically, those who return to work after a period of states based on a competitive process similar to the one used in unemployment are paid less, which probably reflects in part an setting up demonstration projects created through the Middle erosion of work skills, and in part the attitudes of employers Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012.1 toward the long-term unemployed. In a recent study researchers sent highly similar résumés to real-world employers, with some Finding ways to reduce the length of unemployment is an résumés indicating a lengthy period of ongoing unemployment. especially pressing problem because long-term unemployment Employers were much less likely to call back and offer an has been prevalent during and since the Great Recession. interview in response to the résumés showing long-term Figure 1a shows the civilian unemployment rate since 1950. unemployment (Kroft, Lange, and Notowidigdo 2013). Another If you look across the figure at the level of 8 or 9 percent recent study presents strong evidence in macroeconomic labor unemployment, you will see that unemployment at these levels market data of duration dependence, or the finding that the occurred for a much longer period after the Great Recession longer someone is out of work, the more likely she is to remain than after other recessions since 1950. Figure 1a also shows unemployed (Katz et al. 2013). the good news that by the end of 2014 the unemployment rate But the costs of unemployment extend beyond costs that are had dropped about 4 percentage points from its post-recession explicitly economic, and include costs measured in terms of high of 10 percent. But this good news is not the entire story: dignity, human connectedness, mental health, and physical The Hamilton Project • Brookings 5 FIGURE 1A. Civilian Unemployment Rate, 1950–2015 12 12 10 10 8 6 Percent 4 2 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics 2015b; National Bureau of Economic Research 2012. Note: Gray bars indicate periods of recession in the United States. FIGURE 1B. Average Duration of Unemployment, 1950–2015 45 40 35 30 25 Weeks 20 15 10 5 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics 2015b; National Bureau of Economic Research 2012.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Raising Wages and Rebuilding Wealth a Roadmap for Middle-Class Economic Security
    AGENCY/PHOTOGRAPHER Raising Wages and Rebuilding Wealth A Roadmap for Middle-Class Economic Security Edited by Carmel Martin, Andy Green, and Brendan Duke September 2016 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Raising Wages and Rebuilding Wealth A Roadmap for Middle-Class Economic Security Edited by Carmel Martin, Andy Green, and Brendan Duke September 2016 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 25 Jobs and Wages 58 An Immigration Policy that Works for All Americans 63 Early Childhood 75 Higher Education 84 LGBT People Face Significant Barriers to Middle-Class Security 89 Health Care 104 A Fair Shot for Families with Disabled Workers, Children, and Dependents 111 Housing 128 The Racial Wealth Gap as a Barrier to Middle-Class Security 133 Retirement 149 Conclusion 154 About the authors vi Center for American Progress | Raising Wages and Rebuilding Wealth CHAPTER 1 Introduction and summary By Brendan Duke and Christian Weller Introduction and summary | www.americanprogress.org 1 Introduction and summary The American middle class is finally seeing economic gains after more than a decade of declining economic security. Yet millions of Americans are still feeling the effects of a painful economic period. Middle-class wages and incomes grew rapidly during the 1990s, but that growth came to an end around 2001.1 Seven years of stagnant middle-class income growth were followed by the financial crisis of 2008 and the Great Recession, which ravaged middle-class jobs and savings. And in recent years, ill-advised aus- terity policies have slowed the recovery of jobs and wages while income inequality has reached new heights. Add to this the growing costs of child care, health care, higher education, and housing, and families are feeling squeezed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Redistributive Tax and Transfer Programs on Risk- Taking Behavior and Labor Mobility
    ASSOCIATED PRESS/SUSAN WALSH WALSH PRESS/SUSAN ASSOCIATED The Impact of Redistributive Tax and Transfer Programs on Risk- Taking Behavior and Labor Mobility By Adriana Kugler December 2013 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG The Impact of Redistributive Tax and Transfer Programs on Risk-Taking Behavior and Labor Mobility By Adriana Kugler December 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Redistributive tax and transfer systems 4 Tax progressivity 5 Transfer programs 8 Tax and transfer systems: Impacts on occupational and industrial mobility 11 Tax and transfer systems: Effects on geographic mobility 14 Conclusion 15 References 16 Technical appendix: Model, data, and regression results 16 Model 18 Data 28 About the author and Acknowledgements 29 Endnotes Introduction and summary The idea that higher income inequality has pernicious effects on economic growth has been considered for decades. Many studies have been written to establish the negative relation between income inequality and growth, as well as to explain the channels through which this relation can occur. Some argue that greater inequality in a society due to lack of access to education can reduce growth since increasing the skill level of the workforce is a key component of growth. Others argue that higher inequality generates conflict and political instability, which can be bad for the investment climate and for growth in general. Importantly, others indicate that higher inequality and lower earnings for middle- and lower-income households limit their purchasing power and consumption and, as such, reduce growth. A less-studied channel is the positive effect that redistributive policies and programs that reduce income inequality can have on risk taking and entrepreneurial behav- ior, which in turn encourages growth.
    [Show full text]
  • ADRIANA DEBORA KUGLER (March 2014)
    ADRIANA DEBORA KUGLER (March 2014) Georgetown University Office Telephone: (202) 687-5716 McCourt School of Public Policy E-mail: [email protected] Old North Building, Suite 311 37th and O Streets, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20057 NATIONALITY: American / Colombian. EDUCATION University of California at Berkeley, Ph.D., 1997. Advisors: George Akerlof, Nada Eissa, David Levine. McGill University, B.A., June 1991. Joint Honors Program, Economics and Political Science, awarded with First Class Joint Honors. EMPLOYMENT AND PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS Vice-Provost for Faculty, Office of the Provost, Georgetown University, August 2013- Present. Full Professor, McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, August 2010- Present (on leave September 2011-December 2012). Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Labor, September 2011-December 2012. Full Professor, Department of Economics, University of Houston, September 2009-2010. Associate Professor (with Tenure), Department of Economics, University of Houston, September 2005-August 2009, and Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Houston, September 2003-August 2005. Associate Professor (with Tenure), Department of Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, February 2003-2005 (on leave September 2003-2005), and Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 1997-January 2003. Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), October 2009- present, and Faculty Research Fellow, 2004-September 2009. Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress (CAP), May 2013-present. Research Fellow, Center for the Study of Poverty and Inequality, Stanford University, 2006-present. 1 Research Fellow, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), 2008- present. Research Affiliate, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), 2002-present. Research Fellow, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 2000-present.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Reproductive Health Care Access to Labor Market Opportunities for Women
    AP PHOTO/J PAT CARTER PAT PHOTO/J AP Linking Reproductive Health Care Access to Labor Market Opportunities for Women By Kate Bahn, Adriana Kugler, Melissa Mahoney, Danielle Corley, and Annie McGrew November 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Linking Reproductive Health Care Access to Labor Market Opportunities for Women By Kate Bahn, Adriana Kugler, Melissa Mahoney, Danielle Corley, and Annie McGrew November 2017 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 5 Current reproductive health climate 8 Access and affordability of family-planning services 11 Previous evidence demonstrates that access to reproductive health care and rights affects economic opportunities 21 Conclusion 26 Methodological appendix 33 Endnotes Introduction and summary Economic opportunity is a central tenet of the American dream and a mainstay of American political discourse. But when embracing this core economic aspira- tion, the ways in which people’s complex lives afect their ability to fully engage in the economy are ofen overlooked . Te Center for American Progress report, “Te Pillars of Equity: A Vision for Economic Security and Reproductive Justice,”1 explored the diverse factors that afect the ability of women to determine the level and nature of their participation in the labor force and the economy. Te report concluded, “Women’s economic contributions ofen depend on having access to comprehensive reproductive health services, as well as to education, jobs with livable wages, and workplace supports.” Understanding the connections between these economic and health issues is particularly important when determining the mix of policies necessary to place women on frm economic ground, as well as to empower women to make the decisions that make sense for them.
    [Show full text]
  • ADRIANA D. KUGLER (April 2010)
    ADRIANA D. KUGLER (April 2010) University of Houston Office Telephone: (713) 743-3832 Department of Economics Office Fax: (713) 743-3798 204 McElhinney Hall E-mail: [email protected] Houston, TX 77204-5019 Webpage: http://www.uh.edu/~adkugler NATIONALITY: American / Colombian. EDUCATION University of California at Berkeley, Ph.D., 1997. Advisors: George Akerlof, Nada Eissa, David Levine. McGill University, B.A., June 1991. Joint Honors Program, Economics and Political Science, awarded First Class Joint Honors. FIELDS OF INTEREST: Labor Economics, Development Economics, Public Policy. EMPLOYMENT AND PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS Full Professor, Department of Economics, University of Houston, September 2009-. Associate Professor (with Tenure), Department of Economics, University of Houston, September 2005- August 2009, and Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Houston, September 2003-August 2005. Associate Professor (with Tenure), Department of Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, February 2003-2005 (on leave September 2003-2005), and Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 1997-January 2003. Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), October 2009-present, and Faculty Research Fellow, 2004-September 2009. Research Fellow, Center for the Study of Poverty and Inequality, Stanford University, 2006- present. Research Fellow, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), 2008-present. Research Affiliate, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), 2002-present. Research Fellow, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 2000-present. Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, 1999. Special Guest, The Brookings Institution, 1996-1997. Visiting Scholar, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, 1994-1996. Consultant, World Bank, IDB, and Colombian Ministry of Planning, 1997-present.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Social Science Associations Program
    ALLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATIONS PROGRAM San Diego, CA January 4–6, 2013 Contract negotiations, management and meeting arrangements for ASSA meetings are conducted by the American Economic Association. Participants should be aware that the media has open access to all sessions and events at the meetings. i Thanks to the 2013 American Economic Association Program Committee Members Nicholas Barberis Stefano DellaVigna Kathryn Dominguez Erica Field Don Fullerton Claudia Goldin Mikhail Golosov Gordon Hanson James Hines Seema Jayachandran Anil Kashyap Larry Katz Rosa Matzkin Chris Paxson Nancy Rose Bruce Sacerdote David Weil Justin Wolfers Cover Art—“San Diego, Distant Skyline” by Kevin E. Cahill Oil Pastel and ( Colored Pencil, 15 x 14 . Kevin is a research economist with the Sloan ″ ″ ) Center on Aging and Work at Boston College and a managing director at ECONorthwest in Boise, ID. Kevin invites you to visit his personal website at www.kcahillstudios.com. ii Contents General Information................................iv ASSA Hotels .................................... ix Listing of Advertisers and Exhibitors ............... xxiii ASSA Executive Officers..........................xxv Summary of Sessions by Organization .............. xviii Daily Program of Events ............................1 Program of Sessions Thursday, January 3 .........................27 Friday, January 4 ...........................28 Saturday, January 5 ........................138 Sunday, January 6 .........................252 Subject Area Index...............................329 Index of Participants . 332 iii General Information PROGRAM SCHEDULES A listing of sessions where papers will be presented and another covering activities such as business meetings and receptions are provided in this program. Admittance is limited to those wearing badges. Each listing is arranged chronologically by date and time of the activity; the hotel and room location for each session and function are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving Gender Equality in Our Lifetimes
    INSTITUTEINSTITUTE for for QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER Women’sQUARTERLY Policy NEWSLETTER Research Women’s Policy Research Special Edition: IWPR Culminates Groundbreaking Series on the Status of Women in the United States, 2015 By Sarah Blugis, Communications Intern and in each state. The report found that if tury. Overall, the best place for women’s Rachel Linn, Communications Associate current trends continue, women in the employment and earnings is the District On May 20, IWPR released the Status of United States will not achieve equal pay of Columbia, while the worst is West Women in the States: 2015 comprehen- until 2058, and in five states women will Virginia. The grades take into account sive full report, providing national and not see equal pay until the next cen- women’s earnings, the (cont’d on p. 3) state-level data on women’s progress in 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the United States overall. IWPR desig- nated the best and worst states based on scores on composite indices developed by IWPR—Employment & Earnings, Poverty & Opportunity, Health & Well- Being, Reproductive Rights, Political Par- ticipation, and on Work & Family, a new composite index for the 2015 edition. The report also features national and state data on Violence & Safety. Minnesota received the top ranking, while Missis- sippi and Alabama tied for worst. Since the first Status of Women in the States release in 1996, the reports have been used to inspire community and private investment in programs and policies that improve women’s lives throughout the United States. The report and 51 state fact sheets are available for download on the project’s interactive website, www.statusofwomen- data.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 2021 Digest of Other White House
    Administration of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 2021 Digest of Other White House Announcements September 10, 2021 The following list includes the President's public schedule and other items of general interest announced by the Office of the Press Secretary and not included elsewhere in this Compilation. January 20 In the afternoon, in the President's Room at the U.S. Capitol, the President signed a proclamation declaring January 20 a National Day of Unity and nominations for Cabinet and sub- Cabinet positions. From the east front of the Capitol, he also reviewed formations of U.S. servicemembers from all branches of the Armed Forces, hosted by Maj. Gen. Omar J. Jones IV, USA, commanding general, National Capital Region and Military District of Washington. Dr. Biden and Vice President Kamala D. Harris and her husband Douglas C. Emhoff also attended. Then, they traveled to Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, VA, where, at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, they participated in a wreath-laying ceremony. Former President Barack Obama and Mrs. Obama, former President George W. Bush and Mrs. Bush, and former President William J. Clinton and Mrs. Clinton also attended. Later, the President and Dr. Biden returned to Washington, DC. Upon arrival outside the White House, they received a Presidential Escort from all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces and several military bands and ensembles. Then, on the North Lawn driveway, he answered a question from a reporter. Later in the afternoon, in the Oval Office, the President opened and read a letter from former President Donald J. Trump.
    [Show full text]