DOCSLIB.ORG

Dorset Peru Integrated Resource Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dorset Peru Integrated Resource Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Dorset Peru Forest Integrated Resource Project Service August 2012 Preliminary Environmental Assessment: 30 Day Comment Document Manchester Ranger District Green Mountain National Forest Towns of Dorset, Peru, Manchester and Winhall; Bennington County, VT For Information Contact: Melissa Reichert Project Team Leader Green Mountain National Forest Supervisor’s Office 231 North Main Street Rutland, VT 05701 (802)747-6754 FAX (802)747-6766 E-mail:[email protected] Responsible Official: William F. Jackson District Ranger Manchester Ranger District 2538 Depot Street Manchester, VT 05255 (802)362-2307, ext. 212 FAX (802)362-1251 Dorset Peak Vista E-mail: [email protected] The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political affiliation, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status (not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication or program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202/720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write the USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326- W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, Washington, DC, 20250-9410 or call 202/720-5964 (voice or TDD). The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. This document can be made available in large print. Contact Melissa Reichert (802)747-6754 or email: [email protected] Dorset Peru Integrated Resource Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment Table of Contents Introduction and Document Structure ......................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Purpose and Need ................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Description of the Project Area .................................................................................... 2 1.2 Forest Service Authority, Policy and Management Direction ........................................ 4 1.3 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Proposed Action .........................................................................................................21 1.5 Decision Framework ...................................................................................................21 1.6 Public Involvement .....................................................................................................21 1.7 Identification of Issues ................................................................................................22 Chapter 2. Description of the Alternatives ..............................................................................25 2.1 Alternatives Considered for Detailed Analysis ............................................................25 2.2 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis .................................42 2.3 Comparison of Alternatives .........................................................................................44 Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences .....................................51 3.1 Social .........................................................................................................................51 3.2 Recreation ..................................................................................................................54 3.3 Habitat Diversity .........................................................................................................64 3.4 Timber Management and Economic Analysis .............................................................81 3.5 Management Indicator Species (MIS) .........................................................................88 3.6 Threatened and Endangered Species (TES) Wildlife ..................................................96 3.7 TES Plants ...............................................................................................................103 3.8 Non-Native Invasive Plants .......................................................................................107 3.9 Soils and Wetlands ...................................................................................................108 3.10 Fisheries and Water ................................................................................................. 114 3.11 Air .............................................................................................................................119 3.12 Visual Quality ...........................................................................................................122 3.13 Heritage Resources ..................................................................................................127 3.14 Environmental Justice...............................................................................................129 Chapter 4. Consultation or Coordination ...............................................................................131 4.1 USDA Forest Service Participation ...........................................................................131 4.2 Other Governmental Agencies Contacted ................................................................. 132 Chapter 5. References .........................................................................................................133 Chapter 6. Abbreviations and Acronyms ..............................................................................142 Appendix A: Summary of Proposed Wildlife Habitat and Timber Management Treatments ..... A-1 Appendix B: Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................ B-1 Table of Contents page i Dorset Peru Integrated Resource Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Distribution of land by ownership/management ........................................................ 2 Table 1.2: Dorset Peru project management area allocations ................................................... 5 Table 1.3-1: Comparison of important existing habitat composition conditions with HMU objective ranges ......................................................................................................................... 7 Table 1.3-2: Comparison of the existing regenerating age class (0-9 years) with HMU objective range; and existing age class distribution for remaining age classes .......................................... 8 Table 1.3-3: Comparison of existing LWD and pool habitat with Forest Plan objectives ...........14 Table 2.1-1: Proposed activities related to soil and water improvement ...................................36 Table 2.1-2: Alternative C: Areas Eliminated from Treatment ..................................................42 Table 2.3: Comparison of Management Actions by Alternative ................................................44 Table 2.3: Summary of Environmental Resource Effects by Alternative. ..................................46 Table 3.1 – 1: Dorset Peru Project Area Census Data .............................................................52 Table 3.2-1: Developed Recreation Sites within the Dorset Peru Project Area .........................57 Table 3.2-2: Dorset Peru Project Area National Forest System Trails ......................................59 Table 3.2-3: Annual Operations and Maintenance (O&M) and Deferred Maintenance Costs By Trail ...........................................................................................................................................60 Table 3.2-4: NFS Trail System/Classification Review and Recommendations .........................62 Table 3.2-5: Summary of Recreation Resource Effects by Alternative .....................................63 Table 3.3-1: Comparison of existing habitat composition conditions with HMU objective ranges .................................................................................................................................................65 Table 3.3-2: Comparison of the existing age class distribution across all forested habitat types on all lands, and on suitable lands managed using even-aged management, with the HMU objective ranges for suitable lands of these age classes ...........................................................66 Table 3.3-3: Comparison of existing composition with anticipated composition resulting from implementation of Alternative B in the short-, mid-, and long-term.............................................73 Table 3.3-4: Comparison of the existing age class distribution of forested stands with anticipated distribution in 2019 when vegetation treatments will have been completed ...............................75 Table 3.4-1: Selected Financial Benefits and Costs .................................................................85 Table 3.5-1: Management Indicator Species (MIS) and the habitats they represent in the Dorset Peru Project Area ......................................................................................................................90 Table 3.6-1: Species listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) with currently or historic occurrence in Vermont and on lands now administered by the Green Mountain National Forest ...............................................................................................97
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2002 Yearbook and Annual Report
    2002 Yearbook and Annual Report Teaching individuals to take personal responsibility for all of their actions -The VYCC Mission Statement A Message from the President Dear Friends, I am pleased to report that the VYCC has never been stronger. We made it work with our extraordinary staff, board members, and volunteers who are extremely talented, committed, and a lot of fun to work with. Thank you! While this is a time when we can take great pride in our accomplishments, it is not a time when we can rest, even for a minute…the needs in our communities are greater than ever and growing, and the Thomas Hark with children Eli (left), VYCC is an important part of the answer. Zachary (middle), and newborn Rosie (right). Our mission of teaching individuals to take personal responsibility for their own actions, what one says and does, is absolutely vital and essential to creating strong and healthy communities. It is these lessons learned in the Corps that will make the difference in the years and decades to come. While it is true that we operate state parks and do incredible trail and other natural resource work, and that this work all by itself makes the VYCC vital to Vermont, the true value of this organization is what individuals learn from their experiences, and then take with them and use the rest of their lives…it is the values of respect, hard work, and personal responsibility that become imbedded in an individual after a stint in the Corps. Many people think of the VYCC as that small group who built a local trail…though few realize over 350 Staff and Corps Members were enrolled in 2002 and completed over 80,000 hours of important conservation work on 800 distinct projects in every corner of Vermont.
    [Show full text]
  • Taconic Physiography
    Bulletin No. 272 ' Series B, Descriptive Geology, 74 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR 4 t TACONIC PHYSIOGRAPHY BY T. NELSON DALE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transinittal......................................._......--..... 7 Introduction..........I..................................................... 9 Literature...........:.......................... ........................... 9 Land form __._..___.._.___________..___._____......__..__...._..._--..-..... 18 Green Mountain Range ..................... .......................... 18 Taconic Range .............................'............:.............. 19 Transverse valleys._-_-_.-..._.-......-....___-..-___-_....--_.-.._-- 19 Longitudinal valleys ............................................. ^...... 20 Bensselaer Plateau .................................................... 20 Hudson-Champlain valley................ ..-,..-.-.--.----.-..-...... 21 The Taconic landscape..................................................... 21 The lakes............................................................ 22 Topographic types .............,.....:..............'.................... 23 Plateau type ...--....---....-.-.-.-.--....-...... --.---.-.-..-.--... 23 Taconic type ...-..........-........-----............--......----.-.-- 28 Hudson-Champlain type ......................"...............--....... 23 Rock material..........................'.......'..---..-.....-...-.--.-.-. 23 Harder rocks ....---...............-.-.....-.-...--.-.........
    [Show full text]
  • 75 Hunter Brook Road, Newfane, VT
    75 Hunter Brook Road, Newfane, VT Curtis Trousdale, Owner, Broker, Realtor Cell: 802-233-5589 [email protected] 2004 Williston Road, South Burlington VT 05403 | www.preferredpropertiesvt.com | Phone: (802) 862-9106 | Fax: (802) 862-6266 Additional Property Information 75 Hunter Brook Rd, Newfane, VT 05351 Utilities: Taxes: Town of Newfane—$2,770.17 (2015 Non-homestead rate) - Property is not in Current Use. Power: The last power pole is located approximately 0.7 miles north along Hunter Brook Rd to the property border. It’s roughly another tenth of a mile to the driveway/landing of the property. From the South, the last power pole on Hunter Brook Rd is approximately 1.1 miles away. Service is provided by Green Mountain Power. The GMP engineering department should be consulted regarding extending service to property. Septic: No soil tests have been completed at this time. Water: A drilled well is typical for this area. There is no formal drinking water system on the property at this time. Zoning: Town of Newfane—Resource District. Please see attached for partial information. Please consult Newfane zoning official with any specific inquiries. Boundaries:Property was formally surveyed in 1979. It appears to be well marked with corner pins and orange blazes. Services: Fairpoint indicates that phone, high speed DSL, and DirecTV (satellite) are available in the area. The Fairpoint engineering department should be consulted about extending these services to the property. Driveway: There is a roughed-in driveway/landing, primarily used by the logging operation in the past. Road: Hunter Brook Rd is a year round, town maintained and plowed road.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Region
    VT Dept. of Forests, Parks and Recreation Mud Season Trail Status List is updated weekly. Please visit www.trailfinder.info for more information. Southeast Region Trail Name Parcel Trail Status Bear Hill Trail Allis State Park Closed Amity Pond Trail Amity Pond Natural Area Closed Echo Lake Vista Trail Camp Plymouth State Park Caution Curtis Hollow Road Coolidge State Forest (east) Open Slack Hill Trail Coolidge State Park Closed CCC Trail Coolidge State Park Closed Myron Dutton Trail Dutton Pines State Park Open Sunset Trail Fort Dummer State Park Open Broad Brook Trail Fort Dummer State Park Open Sunrise Trail Fort Dummer State Park Open Kent Brook Trail Gifford Woods State Park Closed Appalachian Trail Gifford Woods State Park Closed Old Growth Interpretive Trail Gifford Woods State Park Closed West River Trail Jamaica State Park Open Overlook Trail Jamaica State Park Closed Hamilton Falls Trail Jamaica State Park Closed Lowell Lake Trail Lowell Lake State Park Closed Gated Road Molly Beattie State Forest Closed Mt. Olga Trail Molly Stark State Park Closed Weathersfield Trail Mt. Ascutney State Park Closed Windsor Trail Mt. Ascutney State Park Closed Futures Trail Mt. Ascutney State Park Closed Mt. Ascutney Parkway Mt. Ascutney State Park Open Brownsville Trail Mt. Ascutney State Park Closed Gated Roads Muckross State Park Open Healdville Trail Okemo State Forest Closed Government Road Okemo State Forest Closed Mountain Road Okemo State Forest Closed Gated Roads Proctor Piper State Forest Open Quechee Gorge Trail Quechee Gorge State Park Caution VINS Nature Center Trail Quechee Gorge State Park Open Park Roads Silver Lake State Park Open Sweet Pond Trail Sweet Pond State Park Open Thetford Academy Trail Thetford Hill State Park Closed Gated Roads Thetford Hill State Park Open Bald Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Places to Visit and Natural Communities to See There
    Appendix A Places to Visit and Natural Communities to See There his list of places to visit is arranged by biophysical region. Within biophysical regions, the places are listed more or less north-to-south and by county. This list T includes all the places to visit that are mentioned in the natural community profiles, plus several more to round out an exploration of each biophysical region. The list of natural communities at each site is not exhaustive; only the communities that are especially well-expressed at that site are listed. Most of the natural communities listed are easily accessible at the site, though only rarely will they be indicated on trail maps or brochures. You, the naturalist, will need to do the sleuthing to find out where they are. Use topographic maps and aerial photographs if you can get them. In a few cases you will need to do some serious bushwhacking to find the communities listed. Bring your map and compass, and enjoy! Champlain Valley Franklin County Highgate State Park, Highgate Vermont Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Temperate Calcareous Cliff Rock River Wildlife Management Area, Highgate Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Silver Maple-Sensitive Fern Riverine Floodplain Forest Alder Swamp Missisquoi River Delta, Swanton and Highgate Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Protected with the assistance of The Nature Conservancy Silver Maple-Sensitive Fern Riverine Floodplain Forest Lakeside Floodplain Forest Red or Silver Maple-Green Ash Swamp Pitch Pine Woodland Bog
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Bedrock Geologic Map of the Chittenden Quadrangle Rutland County, Vermont
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary Bedrock Geologic Map of the Chittenden Quadrangle Rutland County, Vermont By Nicholas M. Ratcliffe U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 97-703 1997 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards nor with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. INTRODUCTION The bedrock of the Chittenden quadrangle consists of Middle Proterozoic through Cambrian metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks that lie along the western flank of the Green Mountain massif in south-central Vermont. The Green Mountain massif is cored by highly deformed and extensively retrograded schists and schistose gneisses derived from once high-grade gneisses that were intruded and originally metamorphosed during the Grenville orogeny prior to about 950 Ma. Upper Proterozoic through Cambrian metaclastic rocks, referred to as the western cover sequence, form a cover sequence that was deposited unconformably on the older schists and gneisses. The upper part of the cover sequence consists of marine-shelf carbonate rocks of the Vermont Valley sequence that developed on the stable Atlantic-type continental margin prior to the deformation in the Taconian orogeny during the Middle to Upper Ordovician. In the Taconian orogeny, rocks of this area were thrust faulted and metamorphosed to biotite grade. The basement rocks were altered by low-grade remetamorphism and hydration to such an extent that the Grenvillian mineral assemblages, schistosity, and gneissosity are presently barely recognizable.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset Village Plan
    Revitalizing Southern Vermont’s Villages Dorset, Vermont August 2013 Dorset Revitalization Planning Dorset VT Dorset is a town in Bennington County, Vermont, United States. Dorset is famous for being the location of Cephas Kent's Inn, where four meetings of the Convention that signed the Dorset Accords led to the independent Vermont Republic, and future statehood. Dorset is home to America's oldest marble quarry and is the birthplace of Alcoholics Anonymous co-founder Bill W. East Dorset is the setting of the Bill Wilson House and the Griffith Library. The East Dorset marble quarry was established by Bill W's great grandfather and stayed in the family for 3 generations. Marble from these quarries provided stone for the New York Public Library Main Branch building in New York City The Town of Dorset has an area of 29,463 acres, or 46.04 square miles, made up of many types of land and waterways: flat valley land, swamps, rolling hills, steep mountains, streams and rivers. 14,228 acres contain slopes in excess of 20%, and 2,880 acres have elevations above 2500 feet. The physiography of the Town may be described as two roughly north-south valleys, which contain most of Dorset's development, together with parts of three north-south mountainous areas, which define the valleys. The eastern edge of the Town runs along the western slope of the Green Mountains. The southwestern corner of the Town occupies the northeastern slope of Mother Myrick Mountain, in the Taconic Mountain Range. Thrusting into Dorset from the north is a mountainous area, also part of the Taconic Range, extending south from Dorset Mountain, whose summit, close to the northern town line, is over 3800 feet above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Mountain National Forest Supervisor’S Office 1-802-747-6700 TTY 1-802-747-6765
    Green Mountain United States Department of Agriculture National Forest Forest Service Eastern Region Record of Decision R9-GM-FEIS- Final Environmental Impact Statement ROD February 2006 To Accompany the Land and Resource Management Plan This document is available in large print. Contact the Green Mountain National Forest Supervisor’s Office 1-802-747-6700 TTY 1-802-747-6765 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250- 9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Record of Decision Final Environmental Impact Statement to accompany the Land and Resource Management Plan Green Mountain National Forest Eastern Region Milwaukee, Wisconsin February 2006 Responsible Agency USDA Forest Service Responsible Official Randy Moore, Regional Forester Gaslight Building, Suite 800 626 E. Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53203 414-297-3765 For further information contact Melissa
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Bennington Museum Library's “History-Biography” File, with Information of Regional Relevance Accumulated O
    This is the Bennington Museum library’s “history-biography” file, with information of regional relevance accumulated over many years. Descriptions here attempt to summarize the contents of each file. The library also has two other large files of family research and of sixty years of genealogical correspondence, which are not yet available online. Abenaki Nation. Missisquoi fishing rights in Vermont; State of Vermont vs Harold St. Francis, et al.; “The Abenakis: Aborigines of Vermont, Part II” (top page only) by Stephen Laurent. Abercrombie Expedition. General James Abercrombie; French and Indian Wars; Fort Ticonderoga. “The Abercrombie Expedition” by Russell Bellico Adirondack Life, Vol. XIV, No. 4, July-August 1983. Academies. Reproduction of subscription form Bennington, Vermont (April 5, 1773) to build a school house by September 20, and committee to supervise the construction north of the Meeting House to consist of three men including Ebenezer Wood and Elijah Dewey; “An 18th century schoolhouse,” by Ruth Levin, Bennington Banner (May 27, 1981), cites and reproduces April 5, 1773 school house subscription form; “Bennington's early academies,” by Joseph Parks, Bennington Banner (May 10, 1975); “Just Pokin' Around,” by Agnes Rockwood, Bennington Banner (June 15, 1973), re: history of Bennington Graded School Building (1914), between Park and School Streets; “Yankee article features Ben Thompson, MAU designer,” Bennington Banner (December 13, 1976); “The fall term of Bennington Academy will commence (duration of term and tuition) . ,” Vermont Gazette, (September 16, 1834); “Miss Boll of Massachusetts, has opened a boarding school . ,” Bennington Newsletter (August 5, 1812; “Mrs. Holland has opened a boarding school in Bennington . .,” Green Mountain Farmer (January 11, 1811); “Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Disposals Alabama Through Arkansas
    SANITARY DispOSAls Alabama through Arkansas Boniface Chevron Kanaitze Chevron Alaska State Parks Fool Hollow State Park ALABAMA 2801 Boniface Pkwy., Mile 13, Kenai Spur Road, Ninilchik Mile 187.3, (928) 537-3680 I-65 Welcome Center Anchorage Kenai Sterling Hwy. 1500 N. Fool Hollow Lake Road, Show Low. 1 mi. S of Ardmore on I-65 at Centennial Park Schillings Texaco Service Tundra Lodge milepost 364 $6 fee if not staying 8300 Glenn Hwy., Anchorage Willow & Kenai, Kenai Mile 1315, Alaska Hwy., Tok at campground Northbound Rest Area Fountain Chevron Bailey Power Station City Sewage Treatment N of Asheville on I-59 at 3608 Minnesota Dr., Manhole — Tongass Ave. Plant at Old Town Lyman Lake State Park milepost 165 11 mi. S of St. Johns; Anchorage near Cariana Creek, Ketchikan Valdez 1 mi. E of U.S. 666 Southbound Rest Area Garrett’s Tesoro Westside Chevron Ed Church S of Asheville on I-59 Catalina State Park 2811 Seward Hwy., 2425 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan Mile 105.5, Richardson Hwy., 12 mi. N of on U.S. 89 at milepost 168 Anchorage Valdez Tucson Charlie Brown’s Chevron Northbound Rest Area Alamo Lake State Park Indian Hills Chevron Glenn Hwy. & Evergreen Ave., Standard Oil Station 38 mi. N of & U.S. 60 S of Auburn on I-85 6470 DeBarr Rd., Anchorage Palmer Egan & Meals, Valdez Wenden at milepost 43 Burro Creek Mike’s Chevron Palmer’s City Campground Front St. at Case Ave. (Bureau of Land Management) Southbound Rest Area 832 E. Sixth Ave., Anchorage S. Denali St., Palmer Wrangell S of Auburn on I-85 57 mi.
    [Show full text]
  • VT Sheet3 DMU CMU Final
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Prepared in cooperation with the SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 3184 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STATE OF VERMONT, VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP OF VERMONT MARCIA K. McNUTT, DIRECTOR VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SHEET 3 OF 3 (FRONT) LAURENCE R. BECKER, STATE GEOLOGIST CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS (Some lesser units listed in the Description of Map Units may not be shown here. Asterisk indicates U-Pb zircon age.) NEW HAMPSHIRE PLUTONIC SUITE Zfc 2 OTHER DEVONIAN Carbonaceous albite schist member—Gray to medium-dark-gray, Y lga Ludlow Mountain aplitic gneiss (Middle Mesoproterozoic)—Light-gray to Owwu Sandy phyllite, granofels, and cherty phyllite (Upper Ordovician)—Gray and Belvidere Mountain Structural Complex (Cambrian and Neoproterozoic) Compton Formation (Lower Devonian) Oarq Coarsely porphyritic, greenish-gray, light-bluish-gray, or medium-bluish-gray GRANITES rusty-weathering, carbonaceous albite-chlorite-quartz-muscovite schist, contain- white, very fine grained microcline-plagioclase-quartz (±magnetite) aplitic gneiss; grayish-green rocks associated with Whipstock breccia on Whipstock Hill but of metarhyolite tuff, lapilli tuff, and tuff breccia. Quartz and plagioclase pheno- STAGE GRANITE BLACK FRENCH AND PLUTONS STAGE Brandon Lignite POND ing porphyroblasts of black albite. Unit resembles gray albitic granofels and contains sparing amounts of biotite, and secondary muscovite. Unit interpreted to uncertain correlation Zbu Ultramafic rocks—Brown to white-weathering, green, massive, moderately to Dco Metasandstone member—Light-gray to tan, micaceous, locally calcareous crysts commonly as large as 5 mm DIKES MOUNTAIN AGE UNCERTAIN 2 2 Tmb GRANITE GRANITE schist of the Hoosac Formation (Zhab) be border facies of Y lgg.
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont Watchable Wildlife Survey
    A Report Submitted to: The Vennont Departmentof Fish and Wildlife By Walter F. Kuentzel and Gino J.M. Giumarro Schoolof Natural Resources University of Vermont Burlingto~ VT 05405 2 2000 Vermont Watch able Wildlife Survey Consumptive wildlife activities, such as hunting and fishing, have traditionally dominated recreational use of nature in rural areas.However, social attitudes and patterns of wildlife recreation have changed over the last 25 years, and "nonconsumptive" wildlife recreation has become an important part of wildlife agency's management strategies. This study representsone effort by the Vermont Department ofFish and Wildlife to understandthe behaviors of"nonconsumptive" wildlife users in Vermont, and their attitudes towards watchable wildlife. This research also explores how wildlife watchers' attitudes and behaviors may have changed over the last 10 years. Researchers in the 1970's began to notice a shift in the attitudes of consumptive wildlife users. Heberlein (1991) has identified several attitude changes in society that help explain these attitude changes.He found that: (1) in the mid 1970's, at least half of the U.S. residents opposed hunting (2) women and urban residents had the most negative attitudes toward hunting, (3) increasing numbers of people feel that killing for pleasure, bonding, and tradition is inappropriate, and that better alternatives to these activities exist, and (4) there are increasingly popular theories of conservation and preservation. Heberlein (1991) also writes that women have an increasing influence in society and consequently in wildlife recreation. These changing attitudes about hunting and wildlife have led to decreasesin hunting participation and increases in wildlife watching participation.
    [Show full text]