DOCSLIB.ORG

Docketed 09-Renew Eo-1 Tn # 786 Feb23 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Docketed 09-Renew Eo-1 Tn # 786 Feb23 2015 California Energy Commission DOCKETED 09-RENEW EO-1 TN # 786 FEB23 2015 February 22, 2015 California Energy Commission Dockets Office, MS-4 Docket No. 09-RENEW EO-01 1516 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 [email protected] Sent via email and U.S. Mail RE: Draft Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Please accept and fully consider these comments and recommendations on the draft Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on behalf of The Wilderness Society (TWS). The mission of TWS is to protect wilderness and inspire Americans to care for our wild places. TWS has a longstanding investment in the protection and conservation of public lands in the California Desert. We are also invested in finding the best places, outside of conservation areas, to develop cleaner energy resources to meet the energy needs of Americans while reducing the impact of climate change. We applaud you on the goals of this landscape level planning effort and look forward to working with the agencies on improving various aspects of the draft plan in order to further advance these goals. We appreciate your consideration of these comments and welcome any questions or feedback you may have. Contents I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 2 II. OVERARCHING LEGAL ISSUES ............................................................................................. 3 III. NATIONAL CONSERVATION LANDS ADDITIONS ............................................................... 13 IV. LANDS WITH WILDERNESS CHARACTERISTICS................................................................ 41 V. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN .......................................................... 67 VI. ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................... 71 VII. RECREATION ..................................................................................................................... 86 VIII. COUNTY ENGAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 95 IX. ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 97 X. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 101 XI. ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................ 102 1 I. INTRODUCTION The California Desert is a remarkable landscape. The stark contrast between its extreme heat and bitter cold, primitive beauty, and surprisingly varied and rich ecosystems make the desert unlike any other natural area in the country. Its unique character also makes it a high profile location for large-scale renewable energy development projects, including wind and solar, which then necessitates development of associated transmission. As a result, the desert hangs in a delicate balance between a developed and an undeveloped landscape. Recognizing the multiple uses and values present in the California Desert, the draft Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) makes a strong effort to properly address both the conservation and clean energy needs of California, and sets a valuable precedent for future planning decisions. The DRECP comes at an important moment for California and the nation. The 2014 National Climate Assessment paints a grim future for the arid southwestern states. “Climate changes pose challenges for an already parched region that is expected to get hotter and, in its southern half, significantly drier. Increased heat and changes to rain and snowpack will send ripple effects throughout the region, affecting 56 million people – a population expected to increase to 94 million by 2050 – and its critical agriculture sector. Severe and sustained drought will stress water sources, already over-utilized in many areas, forcing increasing competition among farmers, energy producers, urban dwellers, and ecosystems for the region’s most precious resource.” These changes are beginning to play out. Last year was the warmest year on record globally, the hottest year on record in California and also the driest year in California since the state started measuring rainfall in 1849, the start of the gold rush and one year before California was granted statehood. Motivated in large part by the need to take steps to respond to these challenges, Governor Jerry Brown recently announced a goal to move California beyond the current mandate of 33% renewables by 2020 (a goal the state has practically reached, at least on paper) to 50% renewables by 2030. Following on the heels of the Governor’s announcement, state lawmakers introduced a package of bills to help enact the 50% by 2030 target.1 Meeting the target will rely on a range of options including increased energy efficiency and demand reduction programs, distributed generation including rooftop solar, and some utility-scale renewable energy projects. There will be a continuing need for the California Desert to provide some of the state’s needed new clean electricity.2 To ensure new energy resources can be tapped without damaging the region’s most sensitive wildlife, wild lands, recreational opportunities and tourism assets, a sound plan at the right geographic and ecological scale is essential for local, state and federal agencies to help plan for the future of the desert and ensure these projects are sited in the right places. The DRECP is an opportunity to do just that, by moving beyond the current model of land use planning (which limits the scope of planning to subunits within manmade boundaries) toward a more dynamic, broad, adaptive planning process that takes more factors into consideration to make smart planning decisions. Using this landscape level approach, planning and land use management decisions should be more consistent, compatible, and sustainable over the long-term, and allow agencies to better identify and monitor important resource considerations like ecological integrity, wilderness values, connectivity, areas for climate adaptation, wildlife habitat, restoration opportunities, protection of cultural resources and recreational uses. Similarly, the DRECP initiative illustrates how public land agencies can work together to develop a coordinated, cross-jurisdictional management strategy for both resource conservation and reduced impact renewable energy development. 1 See http://sd24.senate.ca.gov/news/2015-02-10-california-climate-leadership-package-announced. The package also includes bills to reduce carbon emissions. 2 See, e.g., http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-renewable-goals-20150108-story.html. 2 In addition, the DRECP is also charting a course for developing new agency policies and can provide a template for future BLM planning decisions. Through its extensive scoping, local, regional and national outreach, webinars, public meetings, and numerous online tools, the DRECP process has been inclusive and substantive, and has resulted in a comprehensive draft plan that covers multiple boundaries, jurisdictions, field offices, and interests. In refining agency policies and finalizing its Planning 2.0 initiative, BLM needs useful examples of what effective landscape level planning looks like and how the agency can be more responsive to environmental and social change. The DRECP planning process offers a valuable framework, which BLM can build and improve on for its future landscape level planning initiatives. Finally, while the effort to draft the DRECP has been substantial, the plan still must be improved and finalized in a timely manner in order to be effective. Development will move forward with or without the DRECP; and without it, millions of acres sensitive, but unprotected, lands will remain open and subject to unplanned proposals for energy development, wasting years of effort on the part of agencies and stakeholders. In addition, the BLM will miss an opportunity to show how conservation and energy development planning can happen simultaneously and compatibly. Therefore, ensuring the DRECP is finalized and implemented as soon as possible is essential for its success. Although currently incomplete, inconsistent at times, and in need of revision and improvements, the draft DRECP marks significant progress toward a smarter planning framework where conservation lands are prioritized and renewable energy development is limited to those areas where ecological impacts are low, and production potential high. We recognize that the DRECP consists of three separate, but coordinated, planning efforts—(1) a set of BLM land use plan amendments, (2) a Federal general conservation plan and incidental take permit issued to the California Energy Commission (and possibly other State agencies or subdivisions), and (3) a California Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP). We also recognize that meshing these three separate planning processes is not a simple matter. The following comments and recommendations are primarily focused on the BLM land use plan amendments to the California Desert Conservation Area plan. II. OVERARCHING LEGAL ISSUES The DRECP is subject to a number of legal and policy regimes. For federal public lands, the DRECP incorporates both lands within the California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) and lands outside the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NPCA Comments on Proposed Silurian
    Stanford MillsLegalClinic Environmental Law Clinic Crown Quadrangle LawSchool 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 Tel 650 725-8571 Fax 650 723-4426 www.law.stanford.edu September 9, 2014 Via Electronic Mail and Federal Express James G. Kenna, State Director Bureau of Land Management California State Office 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623 Sacramento, CA 95825 (916) 978-4400 [email protected] Katrina Symons Field Manager Bureau of Land Management Barstow Field Office 2601 Barstow Road Barstow, CA 92311 (760) 252-6004 [email protected] Dear State Director Kenna and Field Manager Symons: Enclosed please find comments by the National Parks Conservation Association (“NPCA”) on the solar and wind projects proposed by Iberdrola Renewables, Inc., in Silurian Valley, California. We understand that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) is currently considering whether to grant the Silurian Valley Solar Project a variance under the October 2012 Record of Decision for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States. We also understand that BLM is currently evaluating the Silurian Valley Wind Project under the National Environmental Policy Act. As the enclosed comments make clear, NPCA has serious concerns about the proposed projects’ compliance with applicable laws and policies, and about their potentially significant adverse effects on the Silurian Valley and surrounding region. We thank you for your consideration of these comments. NPCA looks forward to participating further in the administrative processes associated with the proposed projects. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Hook, Certified Law Student Community Law ❖ Criminal Defense ❖ Environmental Law ❖ Immigrants’ Rights ❖ International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution ❖ Juelsgaard Intellectual Property and Innovation ❖ Organizations and Transactions ❖ Religious Liberty ❖Supreme Court Litigation ❖ Youth and Education Law Project Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Elmer C. Aldrich
    PLANNING MILESTONES FOR THE PARK UNITS AND MAJOR PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS SYSTEM July 1, 2010 Planning Division California State Parks P. O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 PLANNING MILESTONES FOR THE PARK UNITS AND MAJOR PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARK SYSTEM July 1, 2010 OVERVIEW This document is a compendium providing selected information on the classified units and major unclassified properties which currently are or have in the past been associated with the California State Park System. The main purposes of this compendium are to provide, in a single source: 1. a record of the major milestones and achievements in unit-level land use and management planning which have been accomplished through the years by the Department, with the major accomplishments of the last year summarized in Chapter II; 2. a variety of other information useful to understanding the past history or current status of these units and properties, and of the evolution of unit-level land use and resource management planning in the Department; and 3. The definitive number and the specific identity of those basic classified units and major unclassified properties which constitute the official State Park System as of the date of this report’s publication. As of July 1, 2010, the California State Park System consists of 278 basic classified units and major unclassified properties. These are identified on Lists 1 and 2 in Chapter III. To have data current to July 1, 2010, this total will be the Department’s official figure until the next edition of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Hydrologic Region Colorado River California’s Groundwater Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-43 • County: San Bernardino • Surface Area: 273,000 acres (427 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This basin underlies Chemehuevi Valley in eastern San Bernardino County. The basin is bounded by Havasu Lake on the east and by nonwater-bearing rocks of the Sacramento Mountains on the north, of the Chemehuevi Mountains on the northeast, of the Whipple Mountains on the southeast, of the Turtle Mountains on the west and south (Bishop 1963). The valley is drained by Chemehuevi Wash to Havasu Lake. Annual average precipitation ranges from about 4 to 6 inches. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater in the basin is found in alluvium and the Bouse Formation. Alluvium. Holocene age younger alluvium, which is found in washes and the floodplain of the Colorado River, is composed of sand, silt and gravel (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). Older alluvium consists of unconsolidated, fine- to coarse-grained sand, pebbles, and boulders with variable amounts of silt and clay. Bouse Formation. The Pliocene age Bouse Formation is composed of a basal limestone bed overlain by interbedded clay, silt, and sand. Thickness of the formation reaches 254 feet (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). The formation is underlain by locally derived fanglomerate and overlain by alluviums of the Colorado River and its tributaries. Restrictive Structures An unnamed fault crosses a portion of the southern side of the basin (Bishop 1963), but it is not known whether or not this fault impedes groundwater flow in the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Distribution of the Elf Owl in California
    STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ELF OWL IN CALIFORNIA MARY D. HALTERMAN, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Chico, California95929 STEPHEN A. LAYMON, Departmentof Forestryand ResourceManagement, 145 Mulford Hall, Universityof California, Berkeley, California94720 MARY J. WHITFIELD, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Chico, California95929 In California,the Elf Owl (Micrathenewhitneyi) has been found only in riparianhabitats and scatteredstands of Saguaro(Carnegiea gigantea) along the lower Colorado River and at a few desert oases (Grinnell and Miller 1944). Although the specieshas never been numerousin California, there hasapparently been a populationdecline. Surveys in 1978 and 1979 located 11 and 6 pairsof Elf Owls, respectively,at two locationsalong the lower Col- orado River (Cardiff1978, 1979). Cardiff's(1978) completerecord of the 28 Elf Owl sightingsmade in California prior to 1978 identified eight locations where the specieshas been found. We gathered10 additionalrecords made since 1979 (Table 1). All recent records were for either Soto Ranch or near Water Wheel Camp. Since 1979, habitatdestruction has continued, resulting in the loss of much of the remainingcottonwood-willow and mesquite bosques(C. Hunter and B. Andersonpers. comm.). This lossis due to the proliferationof tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis),agricultural clearing, bank stabilizationprojects, urbanization, and recentsustained flooding (Laymon and Halterman1987). This lossand itspotential effect on Elf Owlsprompted thissurvey
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land
    DRECP Proposed LUPA and Final EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the Affected Environment for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Decision Area and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) area for cultural resources. These areas overlap, and in the following programmatic discussion are referred to broadly as the “California Desert Region.” More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the DRECP area in every existing environmental context ⎼ from mountain crests to dry lake beds ⎼ and include both surface and subsurface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts (including cultural landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties) under the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), maintained by the Secretary of the Interior (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation of California prior to prolonged European contact. These resources may include sites and deposits, structures, artifacts, rock art, trails, and other traces of Native American human behavior. In California, the prehistoric period began over 12,000 years ago and extended through the eighteenth century until 1769, when the first Europeans settled in California. Ethnographic resources represent the heritage of a particular ethnic or cultural group, such as Native Americans or African, European, Latino, or Asian immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave National Preserve U.S
    National Park Service Mojave National Preserve U.S. Department of the Interior Science Newsletter Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert Research Center: an Interview with Director Dr. Jim André James M. André1 and Debra L. Hughson2 A significant factor in the amount of high quality research conducted in Mojave National Preserve is the Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert Research Center, part of the University of California Natural Reserve System. In this issue we interview its Director, Dr. Jim André. Dr. André is a research botanist who completed the Preserve’s Vascular Plant Inventory for the National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program. The Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert Research Center (GMDRC) is one of 37 protected research sites operated by the University of California Natural Reserve System (UC NRS). This system of outdoor classrooms and laboratories The Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert Research Center is located in Granite Cove at the base of the Granite Mountains. makes relatively undisturbed examples of the state’s diverse ecosystems available with support facilities for long-term Debra – Some of the people who were to researchers, teachers, and students research projects and multi-week field instrumental in the formation of the UC In this Issue: courses. Established in 1978, the Natural Reserve System, such as Ken Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert Norris and Wilbur Mayhew, were very • Page 1. Sweeney Granite Mountains active in this area of the Mojave Desert. Desert Research Center: an Interview with Research Center encompasses 3,496 Director Dr. Jim André hectares (8,639 acres) of the pristine and In fact one of the student camps is called rugged Granite Mountains in the East Norris Camp.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Stratigraphy and Luminescence Geochronology of the Northeastern Mojave Desert
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Quaternary International 166 (2007) 61–78 Late Quaternary stratigraphy and luminescence geochronology of the northeastern Mojave Desert Shannon A. Mahana,Ã, David M. Millerb, Christopher M. Mengesc, James C. Younta aUnited States Geological Survey, Box 25046 MS 974, Denver, CO 80225, USA bUnited States Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 973, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA cUnited States Geological Survey, 520 N. Park Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719-5035, USA Available online 8 January 2007 Abstract The chronology of the Holocene and late Pleistocene deposits of the northeastern Mojave Desert have been largely obtained using radiocarbon ages. Our study refines and extends this framework using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) to date deposits from Valjean Valley, Silurian Lake Playa, Red Pass, and California Valley. Of particular interest are eolian fine silts incorporated in ground- water discharge (GWD) deposits bracketed at 185–140 and 20–50 ka. Alluvial fan deposits proved amenable for OSL by dating both eolian sand lenses and reworked eolian sand in a matrix of gravel that occurs within the fan stratigraphy. Lacustrine sand in spits and bars also yielded acceptable OSL ages. These OSL ages fill gaps in the geochronology of desert deposits, which can provide data relevant to understanding the responses of several depositional systems to regional changes in climate. This study identifies the most promising deposits for future luminescence dating and suggests that for several regions of the Mojave Desert, sediments from previously undated landforms can be more accurately placed within correct geologic map units. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction Previous chronologic studies in the northeastern Mojave Desert area include magneto-stratigraphic studies and Extracting paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental infor- tephrochronology of the upper Pliocene to middle Quatern- mation from terrestrial deposits is an important area of ary Tecopa beds (Hillhouse, 1987; Sarna-Wojcicki et al., Quaternary geologic research.
    [Show full text]
  • California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: a Bibliography
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2019 California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: A Bibliography James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "California Floras, Manuals, and Checklists: A Bibliography" (2019). Botanical Studies. 70. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/70 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA FLORAS, MANUALS, AND CHECKLISTS Literature on the Identification and Uses of California Vascular Plants Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 21st Edition – 14 November 2019 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Introduction . 1 1: North American & U. S. Regional Floras. 2 2: California Statewide Floras . 4 3: California Regional Floras . 6 Northern California Sierra Nevada & Eastern California San Francisco Bay, & Central Coast Central Valley & Central California Southern California 4: National Parks, Forests, Monuments, Etc.. 15 5: State Parks and Other Sites . 23 6: County and Local Floras . 27 7: Selected Subjects. 56 Endemic Plants Rare and Endangered Plants Extinct Aquatic Plants & Vernal Pools Cacti Carnivorous Plants Conifers Ferns & Fern Allies Flowering Trees & Shrubs Grasses Orchids Ornamentals Weeds Medicinal Plants Poisonous Plants Useful Plants & Ethnobotanical Studies Wild Edible Plants 8: Sources .
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Volume 2
    Society for the Conservation of Bighorn Sheep Sheep Sheet - Volume 2 – September 2020 www.desertbighorn.org Before the project began, collection box area in sad shape After the project: a formal, robust spring box Redwood Spring Box Installed at Castle Mine Spring By Debbie Miller Marschke SCBS has been working to improve the natural spring at the Castle Mine location for many years. Mining ruins and a dilapidated cabin remain as evidence that this spring has a history of folks teasing out the precious water from this location. There is always an overgrowth of vegetation at the spring which is proof positive that the spring is active, even if the flow rate is minimal. Bighorn Sheep biologists have GPS data from collared sheep in the mountain range that prove the Bighorn Sheep wander along the backbones of the ridges; occasionally they visit this spring but they mainly depend on the big game guzzlers to the north of this location. Nevertheless, each water location in a mountain range is crucial in the network of water sources available. SCBS crews have dug out and cleared the guzzler intake Johnson screen several times on previous occasions which has been very frustrating because a spring box had never been installed. The water seeps from the entrance of an old mine adit in the side of a hill. The hill face and adit entrance are unstable, and thus dirt caves in and has buried the intake system time and time again. On the weekend of May 15-17, 2020, a modest SCBS strike force sought to make one final but meaningful attempt to boost water output from Castle Mine spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Whipple Mountains
    $5.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 35, NO. 1 • WINTER 2007 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY FLORA OF THE WHIPPLE MOUNTAINS— THE “NOSE” OF CALIFORNIA INVASIVEINVASIVE PLANTSPLANTS IMPACTIMPACT TRADITIONALTRADITIONAL BASKETRY PLANTS NATIVE GRASSES IN THE GARDEN REMEMBERING GRADY WEBSTER BUCKEYEVOLUME 35:1, AS WINTERBONSAI 2007 AN ORCHID IN SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY FREMONTIA CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5113 Phone: (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 VOL. 35, NO. 1, WINTER 2007 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2007 MEMBERSHIP California Native Plant Society Membership form located on inside back cover; dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the Bulletin Bart O’Brien, Editor Bob Hass, Copy Editor Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Benefactor . $600 International . $75 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Patron . $300 Individual or Library . $45 Brad Jenkins, Jake Sigg, and Carol Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 Witham, Proofreaders STAFF CHAPTER COUNCIL CALIFORNIA NATIVE Sacramento Office: Alta Peak (Tulare) . Joan Stewart PLANT SOCIETY Executive Director . Amanda Jorgenson Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono) . Sherryl Taylor Development Director/Finance Channel Islands . Lynne Kada Dedicated to the Preservation of Manager . Cari Porter the California Native Flora Dorothy King Young (Mendocino/ Membership Assistant . Christina Sonoma Coast) . Lori Hubbart The California Native Plant Society Neifer East Bay . Elaine P. Jackson (CNPS) is a statewide nonprofit organi- El Dorado . Amy Hoffman zation dedicated to increasing the un- At Large: Kern County . Lucy Clark derstanding and appreciation of Califor- Fremontia Editor . Bart O’Brien Los Angeles/Santa Monica Mtns .
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Goals and Objectives
    Appendix C Biological Goals and Objectives Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C.1 Process for Developing the Biological Goals and Objectives This section outlines the process for drafting the Biological Goals and Objectives (BGOs) and describes how they inform the conservation strategy for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP or Plan). The conceptual model shown in Exhibit C-1 illustrates the structure of the BGOs used during the planning process. This conceptual model articulates how Plan-wide BGOs and other information (e.g., stressors) contribute to the development of Conservation and Management Actions (CMAs) associated with Covered Activities, which are monitored for effectiveness and adapted as necessary to meet the DRECP Step-Down Biological Objectives. Terms used in Exhibit C-1 are defined in Section C.1.1. Exhibit C-1 Conceptual Model for BGOs Development Appendix C C-1 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The BGOs follow the three-tiered approach based on the concepts of scale: landscape, natural community, and species. The following broad biological goals established in the DRECP Planning Agreement guided the development of the BGOs: Provide for the long-term conservation and management of Covered Species within the Plan Area. Preserve, restore, and enhance natural communities and ecosystems that support Covered Species within the Plan Area. The following provides the approach to developing the BGOs. Section C.2 provides the landscape, natural community, and Covered Species BGOs. Specific mapping information used to develop the BGOs is provided in Section C.3.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Competing Models for the Timing of Cryogenian Glaciation: Evidence From the Kingston Peak Formation, Southeastern California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3ph3f3ps Author Mrofka, David Douglas Publication Date 2010 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3ph3f3ps#supplemental Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Competing Models for the Timing of Cryogenian Glaciation: Evidence From the Kingston Peak Formation, Southeastern California A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Geological Sciences By David Douglas Mrofka August 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr.Martin J. Kennedy, Chairperson Dr. Mary M. Droser Dr.Richard A. Minnich Copyright by David Douglas Mrofka 2010 The Dissertation of David Douglas Mrofka is approved: Committee Chairperson ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I thank my advisor, Martin J. Kennedy, for his patience, commitment to communicating the importance of scientific thinking, consistent honest criticism and unwavering interest in my many academic endeavors. He never failed to provide me with the funding and analytical facilities needed to better investigate a wide range of geological questions. More importantly, he inspired me to better understand Earth history in general and during the Neoproterozoic specifically. I deeply appreciate his friendship and obvious commitment to my development. I am deeply thankful to Mary L. Droser for her consistent support, encouragement and friendship. I was honored to learn about Australia and the Ediacaran Fauna under her guidance at the beginning of my graduate work. She has been an unwavering supporter and source of practical advice for understanding both ―real‖ and academic life.
    [Show full text]