DOCSLIB.ORG

Geobiology 2007 Mass Extinctions in the Geological Record

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geobiology 2007 Mass Extinctions in the Geological Record Geobiology 2007 Lectures 13 & 14- Mass Extinctions in the Geological Record Carbon Cycle Dynamics and Importance of Timescales virtually all mass extinctions are accompanied by carbon isotopic ‘excursions’ or anomalies indicating disruption of the biogeochemical carbon cycle. An extinction at the Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary??? Biocomplexity was not fully developed so, although the Cambrian Radiation is undisputed, the existence of an extinction beforehand is The Devonian Event (Frasnian-Famennian) in passing The Permian Triassic Boundary (PTB) C-isotopic anomalies, possible mechanisms of extinction The Paleocene Eocene Boundary (PEB) or Late Paleocene Thermal Maximum C-isotopic anomalies, evidence for temperature changes, extinction The K-T Extinction (Cretaceous Boundary Event) An impact-related phenomenon?? Readings and Sources • A. D. Anbar A. H. Knoll, Proterozoic Ocean Chemistry and Evolution: A Bioinorganic Bridge? Science 2002:Vol. 297, 1137 - 1142 • Erwin D.H. (1994) The Permo-Triassic Extinction Nature 367, 231-236 • A.H. Knoll, R. K. Bambach, D. E. Canfield, J. P. Grotzinger (1996) Comparative Earth History and Late Permian Mass Extinction Science 273, 455. • Erwin D.H. (1996) The Mother of Mass Extinctions Scientific American 275, 72-78. • Erwin D.H. (2006) Extinction, Princeton Other Readings and Sources • Bedout: A Possible End-Permian Impact Crater Offshore of Northwestern Australia L. Becker, R. J. Poreda, A. R. Basu, K. O. Pope, T. M. Harrison, C. Nicholson, and R. Iasky Science 4 June 2004; 304: 1469-1476; published online 13 May 2004 • Photic Zone Euxinia During the Permian-Triassic Superanoxic Event Kliti Grice, Changqun Cao, Gordon D. Love, Michael E. Böttcher, Richard J. Twitchett, Emmanuelle Grosjean, Roger E. Summons, Steven C. Turgeon, William Dunning, and Yugan Jin Science 4 February 2005; 307: 706-709; published online 20 January 2005 • Sulfide hypothesis of Lee Kump: Kump, Pavlov and Arthur, Geology 33 (May) 2005 Need to Know • Nature of evidence for mass extinctions • Names and ages of five mass extinctions – Importance of geochronology • Which ones attributed to ‘extrterrestrial’ causes and why • Those which are matched to geobiological hypotheses – Types of geobiological evidence (isotopes, evidence of euxinia, climate change and the characteristics of these at events) Major Divisions of Earth History I II III Earth’s Surface Archean Proterozoic Phanerozoic pO < 0.002 pO2 > 0.03 Redox vs Time 2 pO2 > 0.2 bar bar bar ferrous sulfidic oxic oceans oceans oceans Later Snowball Episodes cyano- Earlier Snowball Episodes algae, complex Solar System Formation bacteria protists animals Late Heavy Bombardment & plants 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Figure by MIT OCW. Intervals between Redox stages marked by putative Snowball Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Episodes and Extreme Isotopic Please see Fig. 2 in Shields, Graham, and Veizer, Ján. “Precambrian Marine Carbonate Excursions Isotope Database: Version 1.1.” Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 3 (June 6, 2002): 12 pages. Anbar and Knoll, 2002 Text removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Abstract in Anbar, A. D., and Knoll, A. H. “Proterozoic Ocean Chemistry and Evolution: A Bioinorganic Bridge?” Science 297 (August 16, 2002): 1137-1142. Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Fig. 1 in Anbar, A. D., and Knoll, A. H. “Proterozoic Ocean Chemistry and Evolution: A Bioinorganic Bridge?” Science 297 (August 16, 2002): 1137-1142. Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Fig. 2 in Anbar, A. D., and Knoll, A. H. “Proterozoic Ocean Chemistry and Evolution: A Bioinorganic Bridge?” Science 297 (August 16, 2002): 1137-1142. d13C (VPDB) Seawater proxy d13C -10 -5 0 5 10 carb 1000 531 850-530 Ma U-Pb ages Morocco Arthropods Global Compilation of Late Cambrian (Ma) Adoudounian Formation Magaritz et al. (1991) Neoproterozoic Carbon 0 Vendian 543.3 + _ 1 A.C. Maloof (unpubl.) Isotope Excursions and their 545.1 + _ 1 Siberia Relationships to Glaciations Ediacara Turkut Formation _ 548.1 + 1 Bartley et al. (1998) Namibia Varanger Glaciation 580? Nama Group Saylor et al. (1998) Australia Wonoka Formation Spiny plankton Calver (2000) Oman Huqf Group - Shuram Fm Burns and Matter (1993) Namibia Marinion Glaciation 650 Otavi Group Halverson and Hoffman (2003) Stratigraphic thickness Namibia Sturtian Glaciation Gariep Group _ 746 + 2 " 758 + _ 4 Folling and Frimmel (2002) (common scale except arbitrary for glaciation) Svaibard Akademikerbreen Group Halverson (2003) Australia 827 + _ 6 Bitter Springs Formation Hill and Walter (2000) Compilation modified from -10 -5 0 5 10 Halverson (2003: in prep.) Figure by MIT OCW. Carbon Reservoirs, Fluxes and Residence Times Species Amount Residence Time (yr)* δ 13 C 18 (in units of 10 gC) %o PDB** Sedimentary carbonate-C 62400 342000000 ∼ 0 Sedimentary organic-C 15600 342000000 ∼ -24 Oceanic inorganic-C 42 385 ∼ +0.46 Necrotic-C 4.0 20-40 ∼ -27 Atmospheric-CO2 0.72 4 ∼ -7.5 Living terrestrial biomass 0.56 16 ∼ -27 Living marine biomass 0.007 0.1 ∼ -22 Nemotodes most abundant Summary of Animal Phylogeny animals Ecdysomes- most diversity Individual body plans Protostomes Bilateral symmetry, Organs Tissues Deuterostomes Animal multicellularity more compl. jelly tissues, not organs Radial symmetry 2layers with jelly Monophyletic= ‘sister’ to everything single common ancestor fungi ‘animal protist’ single cell 0 40 80 489.0 + _ 1.0 Ma 490 491.0 + _ 1.0 Ma Temporal Late 500 Orders Constraints for Middle Burgess shale fauna 510 510.0 + _ 1.0 Ma Neoproterozoic- Botomian 522.0 + _ 1.0 Ma Classes 520 Cambrian Atdabanian First Cambrian history trilobites Tommotian Early 530 531.0 + _ 1.0 Ma Nemakit- Treptichnus pedum 540 Daldynian -542.0 543.0 _ 1.0 Ma + Ma Namacalathus Shelly fossils ? and Cloudina 550 Is the base of the 555.0 + _ 0.3 Ma Kimberella 560 565.0 + _ 3.0 Ma Cambrian an 570 Doushantuo Fm. embryos (570 Ma?) 575.4 + _ 0.4 Ma Assemblage Ediacaran extinction event?? Neoproterozoic III Millions of Years Before Present Years Millions of _ 580 580.7 + 0.7 Ma Gaskiers glaciation 590 600 610 Cryogenian 620 -5 0 5 Figure by MIT OCW. Namacalathus: more skeletal diversity in terminal Proterozoic reefs. Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Fig. 8a in Grotzinger, John P., et al. “Calcified Metazoans in Thrombolite- Stromatolite of the Terminal Proterozoic Nama Group, Namibia.” Paleobiology 26 (September 2000): 334-359. Models of Namacalathus morphology, based on serial sections through rocks. Living scyphopolyps Image removed due to copyright restrictions. (cnidarians) for comparison. Please see Fig. 10 in Grotzinger, John P., et al. “Calcified Metazoans in Thrombolite- Stromatolite Reefs of the Terminal Proterozoic Nama Group, Namibia.” Paleobiology 26 (September 2000): 334-359. Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary Extinction ? Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Fig. 5 in Knoll, Andrew H., et al. “Early Animal Evolution: Emerging Views from Comparative Biology and Geology.” Science 284 (June 25, 1999): 2129-2137. Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Fig. 4.1-1 in Global Biodiversity Assessment. Dowdeswell, Elizabeth, and Heywood, Vernon H., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1996. ISBN: 0521564816. Permo-Triassic Boundary zWhere is it and how is it defined? z Marine extinctions observed worldwide in the Upper Permian (Changhsingian) z Base Triassic (Griesbachian) defined at the Global Stratotype, Section and Point , Meishan, China at the first appearance of a specific marine taxon, the conodont Hindeodus parvus zFloral extinction: well defined ‘coal gap’ in terrestrial sediments worldwide z eg demise of Glossopteris flora in Australia z No precisely agreed way to correlate marine and terrestrial sections and an absence of sufficiently accurate geochronology z Terrestrial faunal extinction (eg Ward et al, Science 2005) Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Fig. 3 in Hongfu, Yin, et al. “The Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Permian-Triassic Boundary.” Episodes 24 (June 2001): 102-114. http://www.stratigraphy.org/logpt.htm Main extinction horizon in ash bed (Bed 25) Composite δ13C & Diversity Profiles Image removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Fig. 3 in Payne, Jonathan L., et al. “Large Perturbations of the Carbon Cycle During Recovery from the End-Permian Extinction.” Science 305 (July 23, 2004): 506-509. Characteristics of Permian-Triassic Event • Global regression of sea level; aggregation of supercontinent of Pangea; rarity of continuous sedimentation • Massive volcanism and emplacement of Large Igneous Provinces (LIPS) – 400 to 3700m thick basalts over ca 5 Ma • Uneven marine extinction; sessile animals worst hit and a terrestrial extinction as well • Immediate radiation of different physiological groups (disaster species??) than before and then stabilization of the classic Mesozoic fauna and flora. • More complex and sophisticated ecosystems; new insects like today’s and evidence of metabolic versatility eg Claraia which apparently could survive low pO2. Frequently used decay schemes; half-lives vary by a factor of > 100 238U Æ 206Pb 4.5 x 109 235U Æ 207Pb 0.71 x 109 40K Æ 40Ar 1.25 x 109 87Rb Æ 87Sr 47 x 109 147Sm Æ 144Nd 106 x 109 Courtesy of USGS. http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/volc_ images/north_aZircons:merica/washington.html Nature’s Acasta:Time Worlds Capsules oldest rock: (Ages in My) Images removed due to copyright restrictions. No dates, no rates!! Sam Bowring after Paul Hoffman Images and text removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Abstract, Fig. 1 and 2 in Bowring, S. A., et al. “U/Pb Zircon Geochronology and Tempo of the End-Permian Mass Extinction.” Science 280 (May 15, 1998): 1039-1045. NB Tempo of 13C excursion excludes mechanisms related to the long-term burial or erosion of sedimentary carbon Boundary Clay Bed 25 251-4 Ma (Bowring et al, 1998) Zone of volcanic microspherules Image and text removed due to copyright restrictions. Please see Fig. 4 and the final paragraph in Jin, Y. G., et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carbon and Strontium Isotope Stratigraphy of the Permian from Nevada and China: Implications from an Icehouse to Greenhouse Transition
    Carbon and strontium isotope stratigraphy of the Permian from Nevada and China: Implications from an icehouse to greenhouse transition Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kate E. Tierney, M.S. Graduate Program in the School of Earth Sciences The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Matthew R. Saltzman, Advisor William I. Ausich Loren Babcock Stig M. Bergström Ola Ahlqvist Copyright by Kate Elizabeth Tierney 2010 Abstract The Permian is one of the most important intervals of earth history to help us understand the way our climate system works. It is an analog to modern climate because during this interval climate transitioned from an icehouse state (when glaciers existed extending to middle latitudes), to a greenhouse state (when there were no glaciers). This climatic amelioration occurred under conditions very similar to those that exist in modern times, including atmospheric CO2 levels and the presence of plants thriving in the terrestrial system. This analog to the modern system allows us to investigate the mechanisms that cause global warming. Scientist have learned that the distribution of carbon between the oceans, atmosphere and lithosphere plays a large role in determining climate and changes in this distribution can be studied by chemical proxies preserved in the rock record. There are two main ways to change the distribution of carbon between these reservoirs. Organic carbon can be buried or silicate minerals in the terrestrial realm can be weathered. These two mechanisms account for the long term changes in carbon concentrations in the atmosphere, particularly important to climate.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Causes of Mass Extinctions
    ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ On the causes of mass extinctions David P.G. Bond, Stephen E. Grasby PII: S0031-0182(16)30691-5 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.11.005 Reference: PALAEO 8040 To appear in: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology Received date: 16 August 2016 Revised date: 2 November 2016 Accepted date: 5 November 2016 Please cite this article as: Bond, David P.G., Grasby, Stephen E., On the causes of mass extinctions, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.11.005 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT On the causes of mass extinctions David P.G. Bond1* and Stephen E. Grasby2, 3 1School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom 2Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 33rd St. N.W. Calgary AB Canada, T2L 2A7. 3Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary AB Canada. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (D. Bond). ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT The temporal link between large igneous province (LIP) eruptions and at least half of the major extinctions of the Phanerozoic implies that large scale volcanism is the main driver of mass extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phanerozoic Basin-Fill History of the Roebuck Basin
    lO. )-' ëtO THE PHANEROZOIC BASIN.FILL HISTORY OF THE ROEBUCK BASIN Author Stuart A Smith (BSc Hons. - University of Southampton) National Centre for Petroleum Geology and Geophysics Thesis submitted to the University of Adelaide in fulfillment of the requirement of the degree Doctor of Philosophy, September 1999. DecmRRnoN oF AUTHENTIcITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by any other person, except where due reference is made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being available for loan and photocopying. Stuart Andrew Smith September, 1999 This thesis is dedicated to Ted Moorcroft who always did like the odd rhyme! From EPISTLE TO J. LAPRAIK, AN OLD SCOTCH BARD Burn's Apologia for his Poetry I am nae Poet,in a sense, But just a Rhymer like by chance, An' hae to Learning nae pretence, Yet, what the matter? Whene'er my Muse does on me glance, I jingle at her. Your CriticJolk may cock their nose, And say, How can you e'er propose, 'You wha ken hardly versefrae prose, To mak a sang? But by your leaves, my learned foes, Ye're maybe wrang. What's a' jargon o'your Schools, Your Latin names for horns an' stools; lf honest Nature made you fools, What sairs your Grammars? Ye'd better taen up spades and shools, Or knappin-hammers.
    [Show full text]
  • In Pursuit of Causes for the Greatest Mass Extinction: the Permo-Triassic Boundary in the Southern Hemisphere – Part II
    Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília repositorio.unb.br Autorização concedida ao Repositório da Universidade de Brasília (RIUnB) sob licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Você tem direito de: Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato. Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material. De acordo com os termos seguintes: Atribuição — Você deve dar crédito ao autor e indicar se foram feitas mudanças. Não Comercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais. Compartilhar Igual — Se você remixar, transformar, ou criar a partir do material, tem de distribuir as suas contribuições sob a mesma licença do original. Authorization granted to the Repository of the University of Brasília (RIUnB) under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported International. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit and indicate if changes were made. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich (2008) 153(3/4): 81–91 In pursuit of causes for the greatest mass extinction: the Permo-Triassic Boundary in the Southern Hemisphere – part II Investigating 260 million years old, meteorite-impacted sedimentary rocks in central-west Brazil Raoul J. Mutter (London), Henrique Z. Tomassi (Brasília) and Dermeval A. do Carmo (Brasília) Abstract Auf der Suche nach Ursachen für das Various catastrophic and/or episodic events have been grösste Massenaussterbe-Ereignis: die suggested to have caused the end-Permian mass ex- Perm-Trias-Grenze der Südhemisphäre – tinction close to the Permo-Triassic Boundary (PTB).
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Cratering – Fundamental Process in Geoscience and Planetary Science
    Impact cratering – fundamental process in geoscience and planetary science JKPati1 and WUReimold2 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nehru Science Centre, University of Allahabad, Allahabad 211 002, India. e-mail: [email protected] 2Museum f. Natural History (Mineralogy), Humboldt-University in Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany. e-mail: [email protected] Impact cratering is a geological process characterized by ultra-fast strain rates, which generates extreme shock pressure and shock temperature conditions on and just below planetary surfaces. Despite initial skepticism, this catastrophic process has now been widely accepted by geoscientists with respect to its importance in terrestrial – indeed, in planetary – evolution. About 170 impact structures have been discovered on Earth so far, and some more structures are considered to be of possible impact origin. One major extinction event, at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, has been firmly linked with catastrophic impact, but whether other important extinction events in Earth history, including the so-called “Mother of All Mass Extinctions” at the Permian–Triassic boundary, were triggered by huge impact catastrophes is still hotly debated and a subject of ongoing research. There is a beneficial side to impact events as well, as some impact structures worldwide have been shown to contain significant (in some cases, world class) ore deposits, including the gold– uranium province of the Witwatersrand basin in South Africa, the enormous Ni and PGE deposits of the Sudbury structure in Canada, as well as important hydrocarbon resources, especially in North America. Impact cratering is not a process of the past, and it is mandatory to improve knowledge of the past-impact record on Earth to better constrain the probability of such events in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • GRACE Gravity Data Target Possible Mega-Impact in North Central Wilkes Land
    , GRACE gravity data target possible mega-impact in north central Wilkes Land, Antarctica Ralph R.B. von Frese'32,Laramie V. Potts2,', Stuart B. Wells', Luis R. Gaya-Piq~e~~', Alexander V. Golynsky4, Orlando Hernandez',', Jeong Woo Kim6,', Hyung Rae Kim7, Jong Sun Hwang8.', and Patrick T. Taylor7 i Dept. of Geological Sciences Si Byrd la Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA 2Laboratoryfor Space Geodesy & Remote Sensing Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA 31stitutoNazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, ITALY 4 VNIIOkeangeologia, Dept. of Antarctic Geology, St. Peterburg, RUSSIA 'Dept. of Geociences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogoti, D.C. COLOMBIA 6 Dept. of Geoinfonnation Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, KOREA 7NASA Geodynamics Branch, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA 8Dept. of Earth System Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul, KOREA ABSTRACT A prominent positive GRACE satellite-measured free-air gravity anomaly over regionally depressed subglacial topography may identify a mascon centered on (7OoS, 120'E) between the Gamburtsev and Transantarctic Mountains of East Antarctica. Being more than twice the size of the Chicxulub crater, the inferred Wilkes Land impact crater is a strong candidate for a Gondwana source of the greatest extinction of life at the end of the Permian. Its ring structure intersects the coastline and thus may have strongly influenced the Cenozoic rifting of East Antarctica from Australia that resulted in the enigmatic lack of crustal thinning on the conjugate Australian block. INTRODUCTION Analysis of earthquake surface waves observed at the Wilkes (now Casey) Station during the 1957-58 International Geophysical Year (IGY) suggested that thinner-than-normal continental crust underlies as much as a quarter of the Antarctic ice sheet (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Repositório Institucional Da Universidade De Brasília
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília repositorio.unb.br Autorização concedida ao Repositório da Universidade de Brasília (RIUnB) sob licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Você tem direito de: Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato. Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material. De acordo com os termos seguintes: Atribuição — Você deve dar crédito ao autor e indicar se foram feitas mudanças. Não Comercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais. Compartilhar Igual — Se você remixar, transformar, ou criar a partir do material, tem de distribuir as suas contribuições sob a mesma licença do original. Authorization granted to the Repository of the University of Brasília (RIUnB) under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported International. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit and indicate if changes were made. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich (2008) 153(3/4): 81–91 In pursuit of causes for the greatest mass extinction: the Permo-Triassic Boundary in the Southern Hemisphere – part II Investigating 260 million years old, meteorite-impacted sedimentary rocks in central-west Brazil Raoul J. Mutter (London), Henrique Z.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Earth
    History of Earth The history of Earth concerns the development of planet Earth from its formation to the present day.[1][2] Nearly all branches of natural science have contributed to understanding of the main events of Earth's past, characterized by constant geological change and biological evolution. The geological time scale (GTS), as defined by international convention,[3] depicts the large spans of time from the beginning of the Earth to the present, and its divisions chronicle some definitive events of Earth history. (In the graphic: Ga means "billion years ago"; Ma, "million years ago".) Earth formed around 4.54 billion years ago, approximately one-third the age of the universe, by accretion from the solar nebula.[4][5][6] Volcanic outgassing probably created the primordial atmosphere and then the ocean, but the early atmosphere contained almost no oxygen. Much of the Earth was molten because of frequent collisions with other bodies which led to extreme volcanism. While the Earth was in its earliest stage (Early Earth), a giant impact collision with a planet-sized body named Theia is thought to have formed the Moon. Over time, the Earth cooled, causing the formation of a solidcrust , and allowing liquid water on the surface. The Hadean eon represents the time before a reliable (fossil) record of life; it began with the formation of the planet and ended 4.0 billion years ago. The following Archean and Proterozoic eons produced the beginnings of life on Earth and its earliest evolution. The succeeding eon is the Phanerozoic, divided into three eras: the Palaeozoic, an era of arthropods, fishes, and the first life on land; the Mesozoic, which spanned the rise, reign, and climactic extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs; and the Cenozoic, which saw the rise of mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Aboriginal Geomythology: Eyewitness Accounts of Cosmic Impacts?
    Preprint: Submitted to Archaeoastronomy – The Journal of Astronomy in Culture Australian Aboriginal Geomythology: Eyewitness Accounts of Cosmic Impacts? Duane W. Hamacher1 and Ray P. Norris2 Abstract Descriptions of cosmic impacts and meteorite falls are found throughout Australian Aboriginal oral traditions. In some cases, these texts describe the impact event in detail, suggesting that the events were witnessed, sometimes citing the location. We explore whether cosmic impacts and meteorite falls may have been witnessed by Aboriginal Australians and incorporated into their oral traditions. We discuss the complications and bias in recording and analysing oral texts but suggest that these texts may be used both to locate new impact structures or meteorites and model observed impact events. We find that, while detailed Aboriginal descriptions of cosmic impacts and meteorite falls are abundant in the literature, there is currently no physical evidence connecting any of these accounts to impact events currently known to Western science. Notice to Aboriginal Readers This paper gives the names of, or references to, Aboriginal people that have passed away throughout, and to information that may be considered sacred to some groups. It also contains information published in Nomads of the Australian Desert by Charles P. Mountford (1976). This book was banned from sale in the Northern Territory in 1976 as it contained sacred/secret knowledge of the Pitjantjatjara (see Brown 2004:33-35; Neate 1982). No information about the Pitjantjatjara from Mountford’s book is presented in this paper. 1 Department of Indigenous Studies, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia [email protected] | Office: (+61) 2 9850 8671 Duane Hamacher is a PhD candidate in the Department of Indigenous Studies at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Catastrophes, Extinctions and Evolution: 50 Years of Impact Cratering Studies
    GOLDEN JUBILEE MEMOIR OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA No.66, 2008, pp.69-110 Catastrophes, Extinctions and Evolution: 50 Years of Impact Cratering Studies 1 2 W. UWE REIMOLD and CHRISTIAN KOEBERL 1Museum for Natural History (Mineralogy), Humboldt University Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany 2Department of Lithospheric Research, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090Vienna, Austria Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Following 50 years of space exploration and the concomitant recognition that all surfaces of solid planetary bodies in the solar system as well as of comet nuclei have been decisively structured by impact bombardment over the 4.56 Ga evolution of this planetary system, impact cratering has grown into a fully developed, multidisciplinary research discipline within the earth and planetary sciences. No sub-discipline of the geosciences has remained untouched by this “New Catastrophism”, with main areas of research including, inter alia, formation of early crust and atmosphere on Earth, transfer of water onto Earth by comets and transfer of life between planets (“lithopanspermia”), impact flux throughout Earth evolution, and associated mass extinctions, recognition of distal impact ejecta throughout the stratigraphic record, and the potential that impact structure settings might have for the development of new – and then also ancient – life. In this contribution the main principles of impact cratering are sketched, the main findings of the past decades are reviewed, and we discuss the major current research thrusts. From both scientific interests and geohazard demands, this discipline requires further major research efforts – and the need to educate every geoscience graduate about the salient facts concerning this high-energy geological process that has the potential to be destructive on a local to global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • A Possible End-Permian Impact Crater Offshore of Northwestern Australia; Research Article
    Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT Science June 4, 2004 Bedout: a possible end-Permian impact crater offshore of northwestern Australia; Research Article BYLINE: Becker, L.; Poreda, R.J.; Basu, A.R.; Pope, K.O.; Harrison, T.M.; Nicholson, C.; Iasky, R. SECTION: Pg. 1469(8) Vol. 304 No. 5676 ISSN: 0036-8075 LENGTH: 5905 words The Bedout High, located on the northwestern continental margin ofAustralia, has emerged as a prime candidate for an end-Permian impact structure. Seismic imaging, gravity data, and the identification ofmelt rocks and impact breccias from drill cores located on top of Bedout are consistent with the presence of a buried impact crater. The impact breccias contain nearly pure silica glass (Si[O.sub.2]), fractured and shock-melted plagioclases, and spherulitic glass. The distribution of glass and shocked minerals over hundreds of meters of core material implies that a melt sheet is present. Available gravity and seismic data suggest that the Bedout High represents the central uplift of a crater similar in size to Chicxulub. A plagioclase separate from the Lagrange-1 exploration well has an Ar/Ar age of 250.1 [+ or -] 4.5 million years. The location, size, and age of the Bedout cratercan account for reported occurrences of impact debris in Permian-Triassic boundary sediments worldwide. ********** The cause of the catastrophic mass extinction at the end of the Permian has been the focus of considerable debate. Becker et al. (1-3) and others (4-10) have presented evidence that a major impact was associated with the extinction of >90% of marine taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alvarez Impact Theory of Mass Extinction; Limits to Its Applicability and the “Great Expectations Syndrome”
    The Alvarez impact theory of mass extinction; limits to its applicability and the “great expectations syndrome” GRZEGORZ RACKI Racki, G. 2012. The Alvarez impact theory of mass extinction; limits to its applicability and the “great expectations syn− drome”. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57 (4): 681–702. For the past three decades, the Alvarez impact theory of mass extinction, causally related to catastrophic meteorite im− pacts, has been recurrently applied to multiple extinction boundaries. However, these multidisciplinary research efforts across the globe have been largely unsuccessful to date, with one outstanding exception: the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary. The unicausal impact scenario as a leading explanation, when applied to the complex fossil record, has resulted in force−fitting of data and interpretations (“great expectations syndrome”). The misunderstandings can be grouped at three successive levels of the testing process, and involve the unreflective application of the impact paradigm: (i) factual misidentification, i.e., an erroneous or indefinite recognition of the extraterrestrial record in sedimentological, physical and geochemical contexts, (ii) correlative misinterpretation of the adequately documented impact signals due to their in− correct dating, and (iii) causal overestimation when the proved impact characteristics are doubtful as a sufficient trigger of a contemporaneous global cosmic catastrophe. Examples of uncritical belief in the simple cause−effect scenario for the Frasnian–Famennian, Permian–Triassic, and Triassic–Jurassic (and the Eifelian–Givetian and Paleocene–Eocene as well) global events include mostly item−1 pitfalls (factual misidentification), with Ir enrichments and shocked minerals frequently misidentified. Therefore, these mass extinctions are still at the first test level, and only the F–F extinction is po− tentially seen in the context of item−2, the interpretative step, because of the possible causative link with the Siljan Ring crater (53 km in diameter).
    [Show full text]