Buttell-MA-1930.Pdf (10.62Mb)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
King John in Fact and Fiction
W-i".- UNIVERSITY OF PENNS^XVANIA KING JOHN IN FACT AND FICTION BY RUTH WALLERSTEIN ff DA 208 .W3 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LIBRARY ''Ott'.y^ y ..,. ^..ytmff^^Ji UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA KING JOHN IN FACT AND FICTION BY RUTH WAIXE510TFIN. A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GiLA.DUATE SCHOOL IN PARTLVL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 'B J <^n5w Introductory LITTLE less than one hundred years after the death of King John, a Scottish Prince John changed his name, upon his accession to L the and at the request of his nobles, A throne to avoid the ill omen which darkened the name of the English king and of John of France. A century and a half later, King John of England was presented in the first English historical play as the earliest English champion and martyr of that Protestant religion to which the spectators had newly come. The interpretation which thus depicted him influenced in Shakespeare's play, at once the greatest literary presentation of King John and the source of much of our common knowledge of English history. In spite of this, how- ever, the idea of John now in the mind of the person who is no student of history is nearer to the conception upon which the old Scotch nobles acted. According to this idea, John is weak, licentious, and vicious, a traitor, usurper and murderer, an excommunicated man, who was com- pelled by his oppressed barons, with the Archbishop of Canterbury at their head, to sign Magna Charta. -
Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day
Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................ -
The Apostolic Succession of the Right Rev. James Michael St. George
The Apostolic Succession of The Right Rev. James Michael St. George © Copyright 2014-2015, The International Old Catholic Churches, Inc. 1 Table of Contents Certificates ....................................................................................................................................................4 ......................................................................................................................................................................5 Photos ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Lines of Succession........................................................................................................................................7 Succession from the Chaldean Catholic Church .......................................................................................7 Succession from the Syrian-Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch..............................................................10 The Coptic Orthodox Succession ............................................................................................................16 Succession from the Russian Orthodox Church......................................................................................20 Succession from the Melkite-Greek Patriarchate of Antioch and all East..............................................27 Duarte Costa Succession – Roman Catholic Succession .........................................................................34 -
Stephen Langton, the Chanter Circle, and the Semiotics of Violence in a Crusading Culture
Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2016 Stephen Langton, the Chanter Circle, and the Semiotics of Violence in a Crusading Culture Andrew Thornebrooke Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Thornebrooke, Andrew, "Stephen Langton, the Chanter Circle, and the Semiotics of Violence in a Crusading Culture" (2016). University Honors Theses. Paper 306. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.321 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. STEPHEN LANGTON, THE CHANTER CIRCLE, AND THE SEMIOTICS OF VIOLENCE IN A CRUSADING CULTURE by ANDREW THORNEBROOKE An undergraduate honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in University Honors and History Thesis Advisor Dr. John S. Ott Portland State University – Urban Honors College 2016 For Marilyn E. Turner Acknowledgements I owe many thanks and a deep debt to the discourse and mentorship of Dr. John S. Ott in pursuing this research. His time, expertise, helpfulness with the finer points of Latin paleography, and patience with my Britishisms, have immeasurably helped the construction of this work. I would also like to thank Dr. Brian Turner for his keen insights to the possibilities of expanding upon this research, and Dr. William H. York for always giving me a space to discuss my latest tangential inquiries. -
St Stephen's Church, Hackington and Its
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society ( 253 ) ST. STEPHEN'S CHURCH, HACKINGTON, AND ITS POSSIBLE CONNECTION WITH ARCHBISHOP BALDWIN. BY SURGEON-CAPTAIN KENNETH H. JONES, M.B., R.N. THE first church we know of at Hackmgton was in part built by Archbishop Anselm about 1100 or a httle later, and of this considerable portions stUl remain at the west end and in the nave of the present building. The present church consists of a nave, with a tower at its western end, a chancel, north and south transepts and a south porch. The tower was raised, probably, by Archdeacon Simon Langton, about 1230, upon the walls of Anselm's Norman nave. In order that the Norman nave should be able to carry the weight of the tower, two large buttresses were placed at its north-west and south-west angles, while a very thick wall, some twelve feet high and pierced by a pointed arch, was built from side to side of the nave, inside, to support its eastern wall. AU this is clearly shown on Canon Livett's excellent plan facing page 268. The great buttresses form straight joints below the level of the Norman eaves, and above are shghtly bonded into the tower walls. The windows of the tower, probably of thirteenth century date, were altered in the fifteenth century, when trefoil hoods were added. The whole is surmounted by an octagonal wooden spire dating from the late seventeenth or early eighteenth century. -
Archbishop of Canterbury, and One of the Things This Meant Was That Fruit Orchards Would Be Established for the Monasteries
THE ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY And yet — in fact you need only draw a single thread at any point you choose out of the fabric of life and the run will make a pathway across the whole, and down that wider pathway each of the other threads will become successively visible, one by one. — Heimito von Doderer, DIE DÂIMONEN “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Archbishops of Canterb HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 597 CE Christianity was established among the Anglo-Saxons in Kent by Augustine (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), who in this year became the 1st Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the things this meant was that fruit orchards would be established for the monasteries. Despite repeated Viking attacks many of these survived. The monastery at Ely (Cambridgeshire) would be particularly famous for its orchards and vineyards. DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION? GOOD. Archbishops of Canterbury “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 604 CE May 26, 604: Augustine died (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), and Laurentius succeeded him as Archbishop of Canterbury. -
The Apostolic Succession of the Right Rev. Gregory Wayne Godsey
The Apostolic Succession of The Right Rev. Gregory Wayne Godsey © 2012-2016, Old Catholic Churches International, Inc Office of Communications and Media Relations All Rights Reserved 1 Contents Certificates ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Photographic Evidence ............................................................................................................................... 5 Lines of Apostolic Succession..................................................................................................................... 6 Reformed Episcopal – Anglican Succession .......................................................................................... 6 Anglican, Celtic, Hebraic Succession [Line 1]...................................................................................... 12 Anglican, Celtic, Hebraic Succession [Line 2]...................................................................................... 17 Anglican, Roman, Johnanite Succession .............................................................................................. 22 Russian-Orthodox Succession [Line 1]................................................................................................ 26 Russian-Orthodox Succession [Line 2]................................................................................................ 31 Armenian Succession ........................................................................................................................... -
Chapter Six Stephen Langton: Moulding the Model After 1170
Chapter Six Stephen Langton: Moulding the Model After 1170 Thomas Becket became the model for every archbishop of Canterbury to follow in regards to relations with Rome and the English crown. Such was his effect on the archiepiscopate that many of his successors supported and attempted to bolster his sanctity, and constant allusions were made to his name and figure as a revered saint. Stephen Langton was one such successor to Becket’s see and has been considered by Frederick Maurice Powicke as ‘one of the best, and also one of the least known figures in English history’. 1 Langton had a long and varied career, he was a student and leading scholar at Paris, he became a cardinal and archbishop of Canterbury, 2 and perhaps most importantly the arrangement and division of the Bible as it appears today is credited to him, 3 yet this is sometimes ignored. What Stephen Langton is known for, however, is the Interdict of England in 1208 and the creation of Magna Carta in 1215. Yet Langton is the feature of no contemporary biographies or even hagiographies that have survived to this day, all that is left are the chronicles of Matthew Paris, Roger of Wendover and Gervase of Canterbury which contain letters and other information about him. Powicke’s biography is the only modern work which focusses entirely on Langton and his policies, since many historians have glossed over his life, often preferring to study King John or Pope Innocent III. Accordingly there is very little is known about this archbishop apart from a few of his own scholarly writings that have survived. -
Notes and Documents
286 SOGEB OF WENDOVEB April Notes and Documents. Roger of Wendover and the Coggeshall Chronicle. Downloaded from KALFH, abbot of Coggeshall from 1207 until his resignation in* 1218, is said' to have begun his share of the monastic chronicle •with the account of the capture of the Holy Cross (1187). He took a special interest in the stories which came from the Holy Land, and his narrative is very valuable. It tells us what http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ Englishmen at home knew of the third crusade. The captivity of Eichard gave Ralph a fresh opportunity, for Anselm, the royal chaplain, brought the report of an eye-witness, which was inserted in the new chronicle. The personal history of the king is the central theme during these years. A period which finds a unity and completeness outside England, in which other English and even European events are of secondary importance, closes with by guest on August 11, 2015 Richard's return from captivity and Count John's submission in 1194. Now it is significant that just here, after a supplementary account of the Saracens in Spain, the ink and style of writing change in the original manuscript. Down to this point, with the exception of a few corrections and additions the manuscript and all its various alterations are the work of the same scribe. The entries under the year 1195 are in another hand.1 It would be quite in accord with monastic usage if copies of this earlier portion were sent elsewhere. Such was the case, for example, with Robert of Torigny's chronicle. -
King John and Arthur of Brittany
1909 659 Downloaded from King John and Arthur of Brittany FTER studying, in the order of their composition, the authori- ties which refer to or discuss the death of Arthur and the http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ Aalleged condemnation of King John by his peers in the French court, I have been led to feel considerable doubt concerning the orthodox view on the subject. That view is the negative con- clusion reached by M. Bemont in his well-known thesis nearly a quarter of a century ago. With one important exception—M. Guilhiermoz—every scholar who has gone over the evidence since M. B6mont published his thesis, has agreed with the master.1 And, indeed, every student of the period must feel that his opinion, at University of Tennessee ? Knoxville Libraries on August 19, 2015 whatever it may be, owes almost everything to the preliminary collection and criticism of the evidence by M. Bemont. In the following pages I haye not hesitated to leave unnoticed a good deal of the discussion, including the juridical arguments of M. Guilhiermoz. I have simply reviewed the evidence in the order, first, in which it became known to contemporaries, and secondly, of its composition. The chief conclusions at which the paper arrives may be thus summarised, in addition to the fact that no con- temporary official documents before those of 1216 refer to the con- demnation of King John :— 1. There was no certainty in contemporary knowledge of how Arthur died, but it does not follow that John was not condemned. What evidence there is, apart from the chronicle of Margam, goes to show that he was condemned, rather than the reverse. -
499 STEPHEN LANGTON A.D. 1165-1228 Stephen Langton, Cardinal of the Roman Church, for Twenty-Three Years Archbishop of Canterbur
499 STEPHEN LANGTON A.D. 1165-1228 Stephen Langton, Cardinal of the Roman Church, for twenty-three years Archbishop of Canterbury, the soul of the movement that led to the signing of Magna Carta 1, is a figure that should be of the greatest interest to _every lawyer. Yet to how many Canadian lawyers is he anything more than a name! His latest biographer 2, says of him that, viewed in the light of constitutional history, he takes a place beside the great constitu- tional lawyers, or Somers, or Burke 1. Greene places him in the front rank of English patriots 4. Yet his statesmanship was only one (albeit the greatest) of his claims to remembrance . As a biblical scholar, as a theologian, as a preacher, even as a poet, his position was outstanding. It was he, for instance, who first divided the Scriptures into chapters and his divisions are still in universal use, not alone in the West, but also among Eastern Christians and even to a great extent among the Jews. And it, is to him that we are indebted for the Veni Sancte Spiritus, one of the greatest hymns of all time. Stephen Langton was born at Langton-by-Wragby, in Lincolnshire, in 1165, the eldest son of Henry Langton. The Langtons were not distinguished, but had a standing in the neighbourhood and in the courts, and were the holders of a small manor. They were probably of Anglo-Danish stock". Stephen was early attracted to Paris, then a great centre of learning, where, as student and professor, he spent twenty years of his life, coming to be recognized as one of the foremost theologians of the day. -
Some Aspects of the History of Barnwell Priory: 1092-1300
SOME ASPECTS OF THE HISTORY OF BARNWELL PRIORY: 1092-1300 JACQUELINE HARMON A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA SCHOOL OF HISTORY SEPTEMBER 2016 Contents Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Abbreviations v-vi Maps vii Tables viii Figures viiii 1. Introduction 1 2. Historiography 6 3. Harleian 3601: The Liber Memorandorum 29 The Barnwell Observances 58 Record Keeping at Ely 74 Chronicles of local houses contemporary with the Liber 76 4. Scribal Activity at Barnwell 80 Evidence for a Library and a Scriptorium 80 Books associated with the Priory 86 The ‘Barnwell Chronicle’ 91 The Role of the Librarian/Precentor 93 Manuscript production at Barnwell 102 5. Picot the Sheriff and the First Foundation 111 Origins and Identity 113 Picot, Pigot and Variations 115 The Heraldic Evidence 119 Genealogy and Connections 123 Domesday 127 Picot and Cambridge 138 The Manor of Bourn 139 Relations with Ely 144 The Foundation of St Giles 151 Picot’s Legacy 154 i 6. The Peverels and their Descendants 161 The Peverel Legend 163 The Question of Co-Identity 168 Miles Christi 171 The Second Foundation 171 The Descent of the Barony and the Advowson of Burton Coggles 172 Conclusion 178 7. Barnwell Priory in Context 180 Cultural Exchange in the Tenth and Eleventh Centuries 180 The Rule of St Augustine 183 Gregorian Reform and the Eremetical Influence 186 The Effects of the Norman Conquest 190 The Arrival of the Canons Regular in England 192 The Early Houses 199 The Hierarchy of English Augustinian Houses 207 The Priory Site 209 Godesone and the Relocation of the Priory 212 Hermitages and Priories 214 8.