DOCSLIB.ORG

The Adolescent Brain: a Second Window of Opportunity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Adolescent Brain: A second window of opportunity A Compendium The Office of Research – Innocenti is UNICEF’s dedicated research centre. It undertakes research on emerging and current issues in order to inform the strategic directions, policies and programmes of UNICEF and its partners, shape global debates on child rights and development, and inform the global research and policy agenda for all children, and particularly for the most vulnerable. Publications produced by the Office are contributions to a global debate on children and may not necessarily reflect UNICEF policies or approaches. The views expressed are those of the authors. The Office of Research – Innocenti receives financial support from the Government of Italy, while funding for specific projects is also provided by other governments, international institutions and private sources, including UNICEF National Committees. Any part of this publication may be freely reproduced using the following reference: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti (2017). The Adolescent Brain: A second window of opportunity, UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti, Florence. © 2017 United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti Piazza SS. Annunziata, 12 50122 Florence, Italy Tel: (+39) 055 20 330 Fax: (+39) 055 2033 220 [email protected] www.unicef-irc.org ISBN: 978 88 6522 048 1 Front cover: © Todd Siler Below the Clouds of Consciousness, 1989 Courtesy Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This compendium was edited by Nikola Balvin (Knowledge Management Specialist, Innocenti) and Prerna Banati (Chief, Programme and Planning, Innocenti). Production was overseen by Eve Leckey (Publications Assistant, Innocenti) and Sarah Marchant (Editorial Assistant, Innocenti). Graphic design was by Mannocchi Design, Rome. UNICEF is most grateful to the authors for their contributions to this innovative project. Sarah Cook, Director of the Office of Research - Innocenti, and Ted Chaiban, Programme Director, New York, provided helpful comments and inputs. Thanks go to Judith Diers, Chief of the Adolescent Development and Participation Section, UNICEF New York, who spearheaded the consultation from which these contributions are drawn. UNICEF is most grateful to Todd Siler and to Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York for the rights to use the works of art reproduced in this publication. Todd Siler, PhD, is an American multimedia artist, author, educator, and inventor, equally well known for his art and for his work in creativity research. He describes his philosophy as “Realizing human potential. That’s my life’s work. Those three words sum up everything I live for and aspire to accomplish through my art.” Many of his works are inspired by the brain and its functioning and his interest in its power and flexibility. COVER Todd Siler Below the Clouds of Consciousness, 1989 Mixed media on paper 4 x 12 ft Courtesy Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 6-7 Todd Siler Crossing the Primordial Bridges between Art Science Technology in Human Nervous Systems, 1989 Courtesy Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 18-19 Todd Siler What Are All the Dimensions of Consciousness? 1988-1989 Courtesy Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 26-27 Todd Siler Humanature – A Turbulent Integration, 1991 Courtesy Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 36-37 Todd Siler Evolution of Abstract Realism, 2010-2011 Mixed media on paper 22 x 35 inches Photo: Bill Orcutt Courtesy Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 46-47 Todd Siler Mind Icon No.7 (Metaphorming Conscience), 1991 Multi-colored serigraph on Arches 300gm paper 40 x 60 cm Courtesy of Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 54-55 Todd Siler Metaphorming Civilizations, 1992-1993 Courtesy of Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 62-63 Todd Siler Metaphorming Humanature. Humankind’s Integration with Nature, 1989 Courtesy of Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 72-73 Todd Siler Envisioning a Cornucopia of All-purpose Nanomaterials (2014) Mixed media on synthetic canvas 6 x 12 ft Courtesy of Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York Pages 80-81 Mind Icon No.8 (Questioning Our Evolution), 1991 Multi-colored serigraph on Arches 300gm paper 40 x 60 cm Courtesy of Ronald Feldman Fine Arts, New York CONTENTS Foreword Introduction 9 Adolescent Brain Development: Windows of opportunity 21 Ron Dahl and Ahna Suleiman Neuroimaging and the Adolescent Brain: A period of plasticity for vulnerabilities and opportunities 29 Beatriz Luna Situating the Adolescent Brain: The developing brain in its cultural contexts 39 Suparna Choudhury Poverty and the Adolescent Brain 49 Kimberly Noble Helping Teenagers Develop Resilience in the Face of Stress 57 Sonia J. Lupien Understanding Adolescent Neuroplasticity: A guide to developing resiliency programmes for adolescents 65 Elizabeth Ward Mindfulness Meditation Impact on the Adolescent Brain 75 Yi-Yuan Tang The Perils and Promise of Technology for the Adolescent Brain 83 Melina R. Uncapher The Adolescent Brain: A second window of opportunity THE ADOLESCENT BRAIN: A SECOND WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY A Compendium FOREWORD UNICEF Executive Director, Anthony Lake ew things irritate adolescents more than being told what to do – or how to think. FTheir need for independence is not only emotional. Adolescence is a critical developmental phase of life, a time during which children acquire the social skills they need to thrive as adults. Just as critically, it is also the time in which their brains develop – or fail to develop – in a way that enables them to reach their full potential in life. We already know that in the earliest years of childhood, children’s brains form neural connections at a rate never to be repeated. This is the first window of opportunity to influence the development of children’s brains through nutrition, stimulation and protection from violence and other harms. But a growing body of scientific knowledge shows that experience and environment also combine with genetics to shape the brains of adolescents. This presents a second, crucially important window of opportunity to influence the development of children’s brains – and thus, their futures. In 2016, UNICEF hosted The Adolescent Brain: A second window of opportunity, a symposium that brought together experts in adolescent neuroscience to discuss this emerging science and how we can apply it to support all adolescents – but especially those already facing risks to their well-being, including poverty, deprivation, conflict and crisis. The articles in this compendium elaborate on some of the ideas shared at the symposium. Together, they provide a broad view of the dynamic interactions among physical, sexual and brain development that take place during adolescence. They highlight some of the risks to optimal development – including toxic stress, which can Foreword interfere with the formation of brain connections, and other vulnerabilities unique to the onset of puberty and independence. They also point to the opportunities for developing interventions that can build on earlier investments in child development – consolidating gains and even offsetting the effects of deficits and traumas experienced earlier in childhood. Evidence shows that practical approaches – including safe and secure environments, or the presence of a caring adult – can help counteract the effects of trauma and lay a better foundation for optimal development. The symposium also highlighted the importance of greater collaboration between the scientific research community and development professionals to develop and implement policies and programmes that apply the new science – something we at UNICEF will explore more concretely with partners in the months and years ahead. With 1.2 billion adolescents in the world today, all of us have a stake in helping them to reach their full potential. For today’s independence-seeking adolescent is tomorrow’s doctor. Tomorrow’s teacher. Tomorrow’s worker. Tomorrow’s leader. Their future is the future of our world. Anthony Lake Executive Director, UNICEF INTRODUCTION Crossing the Primordial Bridges between Art Science Technology in Human Nervous Systems (1989) INTRODUCTION Scientific advances over the past decade have contributed to a much greater understanding of the growth of the human brain from birth to adulthood. Latest evidence illuminates the adolescent brain as a ‘work in progress’, and adolescence as a critical period to build on early investments, offering a second chance for those who have not fared well in early childhood. Neuroscientific research in particular is integral to improving our understanding of the cerebral transformations that take place during this time and how they are influenced by interactions between the evolving adolescent brain and the environment in which it develops. In the field of early childhood development (ECD), neuroscientific evidence featured prominently in galvanizing positive change for children through changes in policy and programming and more of this type of evidence is needed to also provide answers regarding critical intervention junctures and approaches during adolescence. In this compendium, eight experts in adolescent neuroscience and development summarize scientific and programmatic evidence from their work, offering an insight into how to maximize the potential of adolescents during this period of opportunity, but also vulnerability. It builds on the discussions initiated at a one-day symposium entitled The Adolescent Brain: A second window of opportunity, held on 4 May 2016
Recommended publications
  • A Dual Systems Model of Adolescent Risk-Taking

    A Dual Systems Model of Adolescent Risk-Taking

    Developmental Psychobiology Laurence Steinberg Department of Psychology Temple University A Dual Systems Model of Philadelphia, PA 19122 E-mail: [email protected] Adolescent Risk-Taking ABSTRACT: It has been hypothesized that reward-seeking and impulsivity develop along different timetables and have different neural underpinnings, and that the difference in their timetables helps account for heightened risk-taking during adolescence. In order to test these propositions, age differences in reward-seeking and impulsivity were examined in a socioeconomically and ethnically diverse sample of 935 individuals between the ages of 10 and 30, using self-report and behavioral measures of each construct. Consistent with predictions, age differences in reward-seeking follow a curvilinear pattern, increasing between preadolescence and mid-adolescence, and declining thereafter. In contrast, age differences in impulsivity follow a linear pattern, with impulsivity declining steadily from age 10 on. Heightened vulnerability to risk-taking in middle adolescence may be due to the combination of relatively higher inclinations to seek rewards and still maturing capacities for self-control. ß 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 52: 216–224, 2010. Keywords: adolescence; impulse control; reward-seeking; risk-taking; social neuroscience INTRODUCTION anterior cingulate cortex to which they are interconnected (Steinberg, 2008). According to this dual systems model, In the past several years, a new perspective on risk-taking adolescent risk-taking is hypothesized to be stimulated by and decision-making during adolescence has emerged, a rapid and dramatic increase in dopaminergic activity one that is informed by advances in developmental within the socioemotional system around the time neuroscience (Casey, Getz, & Galvan, 2008; Steinberg, of puberty, which is presumed to lead to increases in 2008).
  • Targeting Neuroplasticity for Balance Or Gait Deficit

    Targeting Neuroplasticity for Balance Or Gait Deficit

    August 2021 Volume 1 Issue 8 CADTH Horizon Scan The Portable Neuromodulation Stimulator: Targeting Neuroplasticity for Balance or Gait Deficit Health Technology Update Authors: Sara D. Khangura ISSN: 2563-6596 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular purpose. The information in this document should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any information, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or services. While care has been taken to ensure that the information prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up to date as at the applicable date the material was first published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that effect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing this document. The views and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of CADTH.
  • The Creation of Neuroscience

    The Creation of Neuroscience

    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
  • Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity

    Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity

    brain sciences Editorial Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity Ulrich Palm 1,2,* , Moussa A. Chalah 3,4 and Samar S. Ayache 3,4 1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum der Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany 2 Medical Park Chiemseeblick, Rasthausstr. 25, 83233 Bernau-Felden, Germany 3 EA4391 Excitabilité Nerveuse & Thérapeutique, Université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; [email protected] (M.A.C.); [email protected] (S.S.A.) 4 Service de Physiologie—Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, 94010 Créteil, France * Correspondence: [email protected] Electrical or magnetic stimulation methods for brain or nerve modulation have been widely known for centuries, beginning with the Atlantic torpedo fish for the treatment of headaches in ancient Greece, followed by Luigi Galvani’s experiments with frog legs in baroque Italy, and leading to the interventional use of brain stimulation methods across Europe in the 19th century. However, actual research focusing on the development of tran- scranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is beginning in the 1980s and transcranial electrical brain stimulation methods, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), tran- scranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), are investigated from around the year 2000. Today, electrical, or magnetic stimulation methods are used for either the diagnosis or exploration of neurophysiology and neuroplasticity functions, or as a therapeutic interven- tion in neurologic or psychiatric disorders (i.e., structural damage or functional impairment of central or peripheral nerve function). This Special Issue ‘Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity’ gathers ten research articles Citation: Palm, U.; Chalah, M.A.; and two review articles on various magnetic and electrical brain stimulation methods in Ayache, S.S.
  • How Drugs Affect the Brain and Medication‐Assisted Treatment

    How Drugs Affect the Brain and Medication‐Assisted Treatment

    How Drugs Affect the Brain And Medication‐Assisted Treatment Presented by Carl M. Dawson, M.S., MAC, LPC, Q‐SAP Learning Objectives After completing this section, participants will be able to: • Understand the scientific modalities neuroscientists use when studying addictions (Bio‐Psycho‐Social model of addictions, genetics and neuroplasticity) • Explore basic facts regarding the development and function of the human brain • Identify three “Feel Good” chemicals released by the brain (dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine) • Discuss how addictive behaviors and drugs routinely “hijack” the human brain How Neuroscientists Study Addiction • All addictions (alcohol, drugs, gambling, porn, video games, food) activate the same neurological pleasure (reward) routes (pathways) in the brain • Addictionology uses the “Bio‐Psycho‐Social” model when studying addictions • Research has identified a strong genetic basis for all addiction behaviors (There is no single “addiction” gene, there are approx. 90 genes associated with addictions) How Neuroscientists Study Addiction • Remember: “Our genetics load the gun, but the environment pulls the trigger” • Addictions aren't only hijacking the brain’s activities but they have the ability to modify the neurological structures and activities of the brain (neuroplasticity) Neuroplasticity: is a term used in the field of neuroscience that defines the brain's ability to adapt, adjust and change based upon the strength and reward of the experience ‐ “Neurons that Fire Together, Wire Together” Donald O. Hebb (1904‐1985) Basic Facts and Regions of the Human Brain The average human brain weighs approximately three (3 lbs.) pounds, consisting of 60% protein (fat), possessing approximately 85 to 110 billion neurons and produces 15 watts of electricity, traveling at a speed of one‐half to 250 miles per hour Approximate Ages of the Human Brain 7,000 7,000 480,000 6 to 10 mil.
  • The Brain That Changes Itself

    The Brain That Changes Itself

    The Brain That Changes Itself Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science NORMAN DOIDGE, M.D. For Eugene L. Goldberg, M.D., because you said you might like to read it Contents 1 A Woman Perpetually Falling . Rescued by the Man Who Discovered the Plasticity of Our Senses 2 Building Herself a Better Brain A Woman Labeled "Retarded" Discovers How to Heal Herself 3 Redesigning the Brain A Scientist Changes Brains to Sharpen Perception and Memory, Increase Speed of Thought, and Heal Learning Problems 4 Acquiring Tastes and Loves What Neuroplasticity Teaches Us About Sexual Attraction and Love 5 Midnight Resurrections Stroke Victims Learn to Move and Speak Again 6 Brain Lock Unlocked Using Plasticity to Stop Worries, OPsessions, Compulsions, and Bad Habits 7 Pain The Dark Side of Plasticity 8 Imagination How Thinking Makes It So 9 Turning Our Ghosts into Ancestors Psychoanalysis as a Neuroplastic Therapy 10 Rejuvenation The Discovery of the Neuronal Stem Cell and Lessons for Preserving Our Brains 11 More than the Sum of Her Parts A Woman Shows Us How Radically Plastic the Brain Can Be Appendix 1 The Culturally Modified Brain Appendix 2 Plasticity and the Idea of Progress Note to the Reader All the names of people who have undergone neuroplastic transformations are real, except in the few places indicated, and in the cases of children and their families. The Notes and References section at the end of the book includes comments on both the chapters and the appendices. Preface This book is about the revolutionary discovery that the human brain can change itself, as told through the stories of the scientists, doctors, and patients who have together brought about these astonishing transformations.
  • Michael M. Merzenich

    Michael M. Merzenich

    Michael M. Merzenich BORN: Lebanon, Oregon May 15, 1942 EDUCATION: Public Schools, Lebanon, Oregon (1924–1935) University of Portland (Oregon), B.S. (1965) Johns Hopkins University, Ph.D. (1968) University of Wisconsin Postdoctoral Fellow (1968–1971) APPOINTMENTS: Assistant and Associate Professor, University of California at San Francisco (1971–1980) Francis A. Sooy Professor, University of California at San Francisco (1981–2008) President and CEO, Scientifi c Learning Corporation (1995–1996) Chief Scientifi c Offi cer, Scientifi c Learning Corporation (1996–2003) Chief Scientifi c Offi cer, Posit Science Corporation (2004–present) President and CEO, Brain Plasticity Institute (2008–present) HONORS AND AWARDS (SELECTED): Cortical Discoverer Prize, Cajal Club (1994) IPSEN Prize (Paris, 1997) Zotterman Prize (Stockholm, 1998) Craik Prize (Cambridge, 1998) National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. (1999) Lashley Award, American Philosophical Society (1999) Thomas Edison Prize (Menlo Park, NJ, 2000) American Psychological Society Distinguished Scientifi c Contribution Award (2001) Zülch Prize, Max-Planck Society (2002) Genius Award, Cure Autism Now (2002) Purkinje Medal, Czech Academy (2003) Neurotechnologist of the Year (2006) Institute of Medicine (2008) Michael M. Merzenich has conducted studies defi ning the functional organization of the auditory and somatosensory nervous systems. Initial models of a commercially successful cochlear implant (now distributed by Boston Scientifi c) were developed in his laboratory. Seminal research on cortical plasticity conducted in his laboratory contributed to our current understanding of the phenomenology of brain plasticity across the human lifetime. Merzenich extended this research into the commercial world by co-founding three brain plasticity-based therapeutic software companies (Scientifi c Learning, Posit Science, and Brain Plasticity Institute).
  • Protocol Title: Cracking Addiction

    Protocol Title: Cracking Addiction

    Protocol Title: Cracking addiction: does BRAIN Stimulation-induced neuroplasticity reverse prefrontal cortex hypoactivity in cocaine and neW stImulanTs addiCtion in Humans (BRAIN SWITCH)? Abbreviated title: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Cocaine Addiction Protocol Number: 1496 Date of Approval: June 29, 2017 Principal Investigator Name, Degree Branch/Institute Phone E-mail Massimo di Dept. of +39 0871358928 [email protected] Giannantonio, Neuroscience, MD Imaging and Clinical Sciences (ITAB) – University of Chieti Co- Principal Investigator Name, Degree Branch/Institute Phone E-mail Giovanni Dept. of +39 08713556914 [email protected] Martinotti, M.D., Neuroscience, Ph.D. Imaging and Clinical Sciences (ITAB) – University of Chieti Villa Maria Pia Clinic - Rome Associate Investigators Name, Degree Branch/Institute Phone E-mail Chiara MNB/NINDS +39 3281264713 [email protected] Montemitro, M.D. Mauro MNB/NINDS +39 3391979487 [email protected] Pettorruso, M.D. Lamberto Office of +39 3474727282 [email protected] Manzoli, Ph.D. Biostatistics/ University of Ferrara Referral Contact Name, Degree Branch/Institute Phone E-mail Mauro Pettorruso, MNB/NINDS +39 3391979487 [email protected] M.D. 1 Accountable Investigator Name, Degree Branch/Institute Phone E-mail Giovanni Dept. of +39 08713556914 [email protected] Martinotti, M.D., Neuroscience, Ph.D. Imaging and Clinical Sciences (ITAB) – University of Chieti Villa Maria Pia Clinic - Rome 2 A. Précis Background: Cocaine use disorder (CUD) are a major public health concern, associated with high relapse rates, significant disability and substantial mortality. In Italy, it has been recently estimated that up to 4.8% of subjects between the ages of 15-64 have assumed cocaine at least once, whereas 1.3% subjects currently have a diagnosis of CUD.
  • The Dual Systems Model: Review, Reappraisal, and Reaffirmation

    The Dual Systems Model: Review, Reappraisal, and Reaffirmation

    Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2016) 103–117 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience j ournal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dcn Review The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation a,∗,1 b,1 b b Elizabeth P. Shulman , Ashley R. Smith , Karol Silva , Grace Icenogle , b b b,c Natasha Duell , Jason Chein , Laurence Steinberg a Brock University, Psychology Department, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada b Temple University, Department of Psychology, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA c King Abdulaziz University, Abdullah Sulayman, Jeddah 22254, Saudi Arabia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: According to the dual systems perspective, risk taking peaks during adolescence because activation of an Received 22 January 2015 early-maturing socioemotional-incentive processing system amplifies adolescents’ affinity for exciting, Received in revised form 17 July 2015 pleasurable, and novel activities at a time when a still immature cognitive control system is not yet Accepted 19 December 2015 strong enough to consistently restrain potentially hazardous impulses. We review evidence from both Available online 29 December 2015 the psychological and neuroimaging literatures that has emerged since 2008, when this perspective was originally articulated. Although there are occasional exceptions to the general trends, studies show that, Keywords: as predicted, psychological and neural manifestations of reward sensitivity increase between childhood Adolescents and adolescence, peak sometime during the late teen years, and decline thereafter, whereas psychological Risk taking and neural reflections of better cognitive control increase gradually and linearly throughout adolescence Dual systems Sensation-seeking and into the early 20s.
  • Case Study Report BRAIN INITIATIVE

    Case Study Report BRAIN INITIATIVE

    Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies Case Study Report BRAIN INITIATIVE (US) Eva Arrilucea, Hanna Kuittinen February 2018 Case Study Report: Brain Initiative (United States) European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A — Policy Development and Coordination Unit A.6 — Open Data Policy and Science Cloud Contact Arnold Weiszenbacher E-mail [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Manuscript completed in February 2018. This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 PDF ISBN 978-92-79-80162-4 doi:10.2777/1986 KI-01-18-153-EN-N © European Union, 2018. Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Brain Initiative 2 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies Case Study Report Brain Initiative (United States) Eva Arrilucea Hanna Kuittinen A Study coordinated by the Joint Institute for Innovation Policy February 2018 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Table of Contents 1 Summary of the case study ..................................................................................
  • Neuroimage 124 (2016) 409–420

    Neuroimage 124 (2016) 409–420

    NeuroImage 124 (2016) 409–420 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg Testing a dual-systems model of adolescent brain development using resting-state connectivity analyses A.C.K. van Duijvenvoorde ⁎, M. Achterberg, B.R. Braams, S. Peters, E.A. Crone Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, and The Netherlands Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: The current study aimed to test a dual-systems model of adolescent brain development by studying changes in Accepted 27 April 2015 intrinsic functional connectivity within and across networks typically associated with cognitive-control and Available online 10 May 2015 affective-motivational processes. To this end, resting-state and task-related fMRI data were collected of 269 par- ticipants (ages 8–25). Resting-state analyses focused on seeds derived from task-related neural activation in the same participants: the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) from a cognitive rule-learning paradigm and the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) from a reward-paradigm. Whole-brain seed-based resting-state analyses showed an age-related increase in dlPFC connectivity with the caudate and thalamus, and an age-related decrease in con- nectivity with the (pre)motor cortex. nAcc connectivity showed a strengthening of connectivity with the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and subcortical structures such as the hippocampus, and a specific age-related decrease in connectivity with the ventral medial PFC (vmPFC). Behavioral measures from both functional para- digms correlated with resting-state connectivity strength with their respective seed. That is, age-related change in learning performance was mediated by connectivity between the dlPFC and thalamus, and age-related change in winning pleasure was mediated by connectivity between the nAcc and vmPFC.
  • Individual Differences in the Development of Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity During Adolescence: Further Evidence for a Dual Systems Model

    Individual Differences in the Development of Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity During Adolescence: Further Evidence for a Dual Systems Model

    Developmental Psychology © 2011 American Psychological Association 2011, Vol. 47, No. 3, 739–746 0012-1649/11/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0023279 BRIEF REPORT Individual Differences in the Development of Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity During Adolescence: Further Evidence for a Dual Systems Model K. Paige Harden and Elliot M. Tucker-Drob University of Texas at Austin Consistent with social neuroscience perspectives on adolescent development, previous cross-sectional research has found diverging mean age-related trends for sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence. The present study uses longitudinal data on 7,640 youth from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth Children and Young Adults, a nationally representative sample assessed biennially from 1994 to 2006. Latent growth curve models were used to investigate mean age-related changes in self-reports of impulsivity and sensation seeking from ages 12 to 24 years, as well individual differences in these changes. Three novel findings are reported. First, impulsivity and sensation seeking showed diverging patterns of longitudinal change at the population level. Second, there was substantial person- to-person variation in the magnitudes of developmental change in both impulsivity and sensation seeking, with some teenagers showing rapid changes as they matured and others maintaining relatively constant levels with age. Finally, the correlation between age-related changes in impulsivity and sensation seeking was modest and not significant. Together, these results constitute the first support for the dual systems model of adolescent development to derive from longitudinal behavioral data. Keywords: adolescence, impulsivity, sensation seeking, personality, individual differences Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by sweep- maturity at different ages (Somerville et al., 2010).