European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2020 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HUMAN REPRODUCTION AND EMBRYOLOGY Virtual Congress, 5th-8th July 2020 The purpose of this report is to capture highlights from the ESHRE 2020 congress. The REPROFACTS faculty has selected the studies presented in this report; putting study findings in perspective and extracting the practice points. The faculty members were independent in their choice of studies and their evaluation and this report is based on the REPROFACTS 2020 Post-ESHRE meeting. The development of this congress report has been financially supported by MERCK KGaA, however MERCK KGaA had no influence on the content and scientific opinions presented in the congress report do not necessarily represent the position of MERCK KGaA. MERCK KGaA is not responsible for the content of the report. Consequently, MERCK KGaA does not give any warranty, express or implied, regarding the scientific use of this report, or regarding any other particular use for any purpose, and MERCK KGaA therefore is not liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages related to the use of the information contained herein. GL-NONF-00570 August 2020 Sponsored by INTRODUCTION TO REPROFACTS Foreword The year 2020 marks a new era in many fields of life and profession, and this is also true for reproductive medicine. For the first time since the inaugural meeting in Bonn in 1985, ESHREs annual get-to-together went exclusively virtual, providing a totally new experience for everyone involved, from presenter to audience to industry. While online lectures on-demand and ease of access to the presentations were convenient (and will likely stay), the inspiration gained from personal contact and the focus to the conference without distraction from routine business at home was certainly missed by many of the 12,520 online participants. The COVID-19 crisis did, however, not impact the quantity or quality of the main scientific program, with 200+ peer-reviewed oral communications and more than 60 invited lectures. The wealth and breadth of information was as challenging as ever, so our REPROFACTs expert team once again shared the subspecialties among each other, sorted out ‘the wheat from the chaff’, and presented the essence of the ESHRE lectures in a one-day meeting in Mainz, Germany, on July 17, 2020. This years REPROFACTS meeting marked the 10th anniversary of an initiative which started as a small ‘POST-ESHRE’ discussion forum and which grew, with Merck as a strong partner, into one of the largest reproductive medicine conferences within the German speaking countries. The COVID crisis also left its mark on the format of REPROFACTS, which was for the first time held as a hybrid-meeting, with online live streaming of the real event. This report contains some of the key highlights from the REPROFACTS meeting 2020. Selection of topics was done by the REPROFACTS faculty, independently and neutrally, with a focus on clinically relevant novelties. Watch Prof. Griesinger discuss the virtual ESHRE 2020 congress. 1 INTRODUCTION TO REPROFACTS Faculty members Prof. Dr. med. habil. Dr. rer. nat. Jens Hirchenhain Jürgen M. Weiss Düsseldorf. Subspeciality: clinical Lucerne. Subspecialities: female infertility embryology and ovarian stimulation Prof. Dr. med. Heribert Kentenich Prof. med. Ludwig Wildt Berlin. Subspecialities: safety and quality, Innsbruck. Subspeciality: endocrinology law and ethics, psychology Priv.-Doz. Dr. rer. nat. Verena Prof. Dr. med. Michael von Wolff Nordhoff Münster. Subspecialities: basic science Bern. Subspecialities: fertility preservation, and reproductive genetics ovarian reserve, surgery Dr. med. Maren Goeckenjan Prof. Dr. med. Michael Zitzmann Dresden. Subspecialities: endometrium, Münster. Subspeciality: andrology endometriosis, early pregnancy 2 CONTENTS Andrology Low male testosterone 5 Negative impact of elevated DFI and HPV presence in sperm 7 Reproductive endocrinology Efficacy and safety of linzagolix on HMB due to uterine fibroids 8 Relugolix for heavy menstrual bleeding due to uterine fibroids 10 Use of testosterone gel treatment in poor ovarian reserve in IVF-ICSI cycles 11 Early pregnancy Pre-treatment with mifepristone to misoprostol in early pregnancy failure 13 Conception after early IVF pregnancy loss - should we wait? 15 Updated terminology for early pregnancy assessment 17 Fertility preservation and reproductive surgery Live birth rate and utilization rate of eggs and embryos following FP 19 LH preserves the meiotic potential of oocytes exposed to chemotherapy 21 Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus 22 3 CONTENTS Clinical embryology New evidence on mosaic developmental potential 24 Complex mosaic embryos after preimplantation genetic testing 26 Novel technologies for single-sperm vitrification 27 Intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility 29 Embryos excluding multinucleated cells during blastocyst formation increase their reproductive potential 31 Ovarian stimulation Optimal GnRH antagonist protocol during ovarian stimulation 33 Comparing different progestin regimens for pituitary suppression 34 MPA as a pituitary suppressor instead of a GnRH antagonist during ovarian stimulation 36 Pituitary suppression is not necessary for blocking LH surge during luteal-phase stimulation 37 Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer 38 Safety & Outcomes Nordic sibling study 39 Imprinting disorders in children born after ART 41 Major congenital malformations risk in children conceived after ICSI 43 Artificially prepared frozen cycles and increased risk of preeclampsia 44 Additional Video Highlights 46 4 Low male testosterone results in a substantial decrease of ANDROLOGY fresh live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility undergoing IVF, O-016 P. Drakopoulos et al. Background Sperm production is regulated via a complex and dynamic process that requires interaction of multiple hormones and testicular cell types. Testosterone is indispensable for sperm production; however, testosterone exerts it spermatogenetic action only within a network of endocrine and paracrine signals and tightly coordinated gene and protein expression programs within the testis. Little attention has so far been paid on the potential association of testosterone synthesis with fertility in case of normal sperm parameters. The necessity of routinely evaluating Watch Prof. Michael Zitzmann discuss the potential role of serum testosterone levels in male partner of testosterone as a functional marker for reduced fertility couples trying to conceive is also under dispute. potential. Study In a retrospective analysis (time period 2011 to No relevant difference in sperm parameters were 2018), conducted at the University of Brussels found in patients with low vs. normal testosterone Reproductive Medicine Center, 1,026 couples levels. However, the live birth rate was significantly undergoing a first IVF cycle for non-male factor reduced in the low testosterone group (13%; 95% subfertility were identified. Treatment course and CI, 8, 20) vs. normal testosterone group (23%; outcome of 136 couples (13.3%) with a male 95% CI, 21, 26). This finding remained after partner with a total serum testosterone of <264ng/ adjusting for male and female age, male smoking, dl (<9.2 nmol/L) were compared with couples with female BMI, number of oocytes and embryos, male partners above this threshold. This threshold cause of infertility and SHBG levels (adjusted OR, represents the recommended lower limit of the 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15, 0.79). Accordingly, both total normal total testosterone (TT) in healthy non- and free testosterone in serum were positively obese young men1. In a recent post-hoc analysis associated with live birth likelihood. of the AMIGOS RCT2, a decreased odds of live birth was observed in couples with unexplained infertility undergoing ovarian stimulation with letrozole, clomifen or FSH for timed intercourse or IUI, whose male partner was below 264ng/dl total testosterone (adjusted OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38, 1.12). Only morning testosterone samples and men with no exogenous testosterone or other relevant medication were included in the Brussels study. 5 Low male testosterone results in a substantial decrease of fresh live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility ANDROLOGY undergoing IVF, O-016 P. Drakopoulos et al. Univariate-analysis: live birth rate by male partner testosterone serum 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 Line Birth Rate (%) Birth Line 0.0 Low Testosterone Normal Testosterone (<264 ng/dl) (≥264 ng/dl) Comment This study aimed at validating the post-hoc observation from the AMIGOS trial2 in the setting of IVF. In both studies, male factor (defined by sperm analysis) was excluded. Thus, the findings hint at a qualitative association of the endocrine and reproductive function of the testis. Practice point Testosterone administration is contra-indicated in the context of fertility treatment. Selective estrogen receptor modulators, gonadotropins and aromatase inhibitors can restore serum testosterone levels, however, the consequences of these pharmacological interventions for natural fertility or ART have not yet been fully clarified. 6 Negative impact of elevated DNA fragmentation index (DFI) ANDROLOGY and human Papillomavirus (HPV) presence in sperm on the outcome of intra-uterine insemination (IUI), O-017 C. Depuydt et al. Background Comment Human Papillomavirus (HPV) are sexually This study corroborates the hypothesis
Recommended publications
  • The Use of Stems in the Selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances" WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1
    INN Working Document 19.450 04/02/2019 Addendum1 to "The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances" WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 Programme on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) Technologies Standards and Norms (TSN) Regulation of Medicines and other health technologies (RHT) World Health Organization, Geneva © World Health Organization 2019 - All rights reserved. The contents of this document may not be reviewed, abstracted, quoted, referenced, reproduced, transmitted, distributed, translated or adapted, in part or in whole, in any form or by any means, without explicit prior authorization of the WHO INN Programme. This document contains the collective views of the INN Expert Group and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization. Addendum1 to "The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances" - WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 1 This addendum is a cumulative list of all new stems selected by the INN Expert Group since the publication of "The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances" 2018. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -calcet/-calcet- calcium-sensing receptors (CaSR) agonists cinacalcet (88), etelcalcetide (112), evocalcet (113), tecalcet (87), upacicalcet (118) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Ganirelix) May Prevent Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Caused by Ovarian Stimulation for In-Vitro Fertilization
    Human Reproduction vol.13 no.3 pp.573–575, 1998 CASE REPORT High dose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (ganirelix) may prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome caused by ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization D.de Jong1, N.S.Macklon1, B.M.J.L.Mannaerts2, releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in order to prevent H.J.T.Coelingh Bennink2 and B.C.J.M.Fauser1,3 unpredictable changes in release of endogenous gonadotrophins. However, it has been reported that the continued administration 1Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dijkzigt Academic Hospital and Erasmus University of GnRH agonists does not affect subsequent ovarian quiescence Medical School, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam and (Wadaet al., 1992). This may be related to prolonged suppression 2Scientific Development Group, NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands of pituitary function due to slow recovery from down-regulation 3To whom correspondence should be addressed (Donderwinkel et al., 1993). Some residual gonadotrophin release may remain during GnRH agonist suppression, whereas This case report describes the first attempt to treat pituitary release of LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) imminent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by may be virtually abolished with the sustained use of a high dose using a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) of GnRH antagonist. In this case report we describe an alternative antagonist. A 33 year old, normo-ovulatory woman under- method, using a high dose of a GnRH antagonist which may going in-vitro fertilization received daily subcutaneous decrease the risk of a severe OHSS. injections of 150 IU of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (recFSH) from cycle day 2, together with GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) 0.125 mg from cycle day 7 onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Myovant Sciences Ltd. 10K 2021 V1
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _______ Commission file number 001-37929 Myovant Sciences Ltd. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Bermuda 98-1343578 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Suite 1, 3rd Floor 11-12 St. James’s Square London SW1Y 4LB United Kingdom Not Applicable (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: +44 (207) 400 3351 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each Class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered Common Shares, $0.000017727 par value per share MYOV New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertility Medications: Bravelle®, Cetrotide®, Clomid, Clomiphene, Follistim AQ®, Ganirelix®, Gonal-F®, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Leuprolide
    Drug Therapy Guidelines Fertility Medications: Bravelle®, Cetrotide®, Clomid, clomiphene, Follistim AQ®, Ganirelix®, Gonal-F®, human chorionic gonadotropin, leuprolide, Menopur®, Novarel®, Ovidrel®, Pregnyl®, Crinone®, Applicable* Endometrin®, First-Progesterone®, progesterone in oil Medical Benefit x Effective: 08/03/2021 Pharmacy- Formulary 1 x Next Review: 6/22 Pharmacy- Formulary 2 x Date of Origin: 7/00 Pharmacy- Formulary 3/Exclusive x Review Dates: 7/12/00, 5/8/01, 1/15/02, 5/6/03, 12/16/03, 6/8/04, Pharmacy- Formulary 4/AON x 12/16/05, 2/1/06, 10/15/06, 7/20/07, 11/5/07, 12/15/08, 12/09, 9/10, 1/11, 9/11, 9/12, 9/13, 9/14, 6/15, 6/16, 6/17, 6/18, 6/19, 9/19, 3/20, 6/20, 9/20, 3/21, 6/21 I. Medication Description Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonists are indicated for the inhibition of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. GnRH Antagonists are indicated for inhibition of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. Gonadotropins, FSH, or combination of FSH/LH are indicated for stimulation of ovarian follicular growth. Human chorionic gonadotropins (hCG) are indicated for inducing ovulation. Clomiphene is a selective-estrogen receptor-modulator (SERM) used for inducing ovulation. Therapeutic Class Agents GnRH Agonists leuprolide GnRH Antagonists Cetrotide®, Ganirelix® Gonadotropins Follitropin alfa: Gonal-F®, Gonal-F RFF® (non-preferred) Follitropin beta: Follistim AQ® (preferred) Menotropins: Menopur® Urofollitropins: Bravelle® hCG human chorionic gonadotropin, Novarel®, Ovidrel®, Pregnyl® Progestin Injection progesterone oil for injection Vaginal Progesterone Crinone, Endometrin, First-Progesterone Selective-estrogen receptor- Clomid*, Clomiphene* modulator (SERM) II.
    [Show full text]
  • Obseva SA Reports Consistent Long-Term Findings from Phase 2B EDELWEISS Trial of Linzagolix for Endometriosis-Associated Pain
    ObsEva SA Reports Consistent Long-Term Findings from Phase 2b EDELWEISS trial of Linzagolix for Endometriosis-Associated Pain Geneva, Switzerland and Boston, MA – May 3, 2019 – ObsEva SA (NASDAQ: OBSV / SIX: OBSN), a clinical- stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics for serious conditions that compromise a woman’s reproductive health and pregnancy, today reported follow-up results from the Phase 2b EDELWEISS clinical trial of its oral gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, linzagolix, for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. These new data include 28-week extension study treatment (52 weeks of continuous treatment), as well as the 24-week post treatment follow-up (PTFU) results for patients who did not enter the extension study after completing the initial 24-week treatment period. "We are pleased to report long-term data from the EDELWEISS trial of linzagolix, which show that in patients treated with linzagolix for 52 weeks, pelvic pain response rates are maintained with the 75mg or the 200mg dose. Bone mineral density remains within safe limits. Patients that were followed for 6 months after treatment completion continue to experience pain control, and showed BMD increase,” said Ernest Loumaye, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of ObsEva. “These data further support the long term therapeutic potential of linzagolix and support the currently starting Phase 3 program for the endometriosis indication, as we anticipate initial Phase 3 clinical results later this year from the trial in uterine fibroids.” Overall Pelvic Pain reduction sustained long-term After 52 weeks of treatment, responder rates for Overall Pelvic Pain (OPP)— defined as the proportion of patients experiencing an OPP score reduction >30% from baseline using a verbal rating scale— were 69% for the 75mg once daily dose and 82% for the 200mg/100mg once daily dose.
    [Show full text]
  • Follicular and Endocrine Profiles Associated with Different Gnrh
    Reproductive BioMedicine Online (2012) 24, 153– 162 www.sciencedirect.com www.rbmonline.com ARTICLE Follicular and endocrine profiles associated with different GnRH-antagonist regimens: a randomized controlled trial Juan Antonio Garcı´a-Velasco a, Sanja Kupesic b, Antonio Pellicer c, Claire Bourgain d, Carlos Simo´n e, Milan Mrazek f, Paul Devroey g, Joan-Carles Arce h,* a IVI Foundation, Reproductive Endocrinology, Madrid, Spain; b Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, El Paso, TX, USA; c IVI Foundation, Reproductive Endocrinology, Valencia, Spain; d UZ Brussel, Department of Pathology, Brussels, Belgium; e IVI Foundation, Research Department, Valencia, Spain; f ISCARE IVF a.s., Lighthouse, Prague, Czech Republic; g UZ Brussel, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels, Belgium; h Reproductive Health, Global Clinical and Non-Clinical R & D, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Copenhagen, Denmark * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (J.-C. Arce). Dr Juan Garcı´a-Velasco did his training in obstetrics and gynaecology at Madrid Autonoma University, and then his reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship at Yale University, USA (1997–1998). He is now Director of IVI-Madrid and Associate Professor at Rey Juan Carlos University. He has published over 100 peer- reviewed articles. He is an ad-hoc reviewer for the main journals in the field and serves on the editorial board of Reproductive BioMedicine Online. His main research interests are endometriosis, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, low responders and human implantation. Abstract This trial assessed the impact of early initiation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist on follicular and endocrine profiles compared with the fixed GnRH-antagonist protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • Ganirelix Acetate) Injection
    1 Antagonä (ganirelix acetate) Injection 2 FOR SUBCUTANEOUS USE ONLY 3 4 DESCRIPTION 5 Antagonä (ganirelix acetate) Injection is a synthetic decapeptide with high antagonistic 6 activity against naturally occurring gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Ganirelix 7 acetate is derived from native GnRH with substitutions of amino acids at positions 1, 2, 3, 8 6, 8, and 10 to form the following molecular formula of the peptide: N-acetyl-3-(2- 9 naphthyl)-D-alanyl-4-chloro-D-phenylalanyl-3-(3-pyridyl)-D-alanyl-L-seryl-L-tyrosyl- 10 N9,N10-diethyl-D-homoarginyl-L-leucyl-N9,N10-diethyl-L-homoarginyl-L-prolyl-D- 11 alanylamide acetate. The molecular weight for ganirelix acetate is 1570.4 as an anhydrous 12 free base. The structural formula is as follows: 13 Ganirelix acetate 14 15 16 17 18 19 + x C2H4O2 + y H2O 20 21 Antagonä is supplied as a colorless, sterile, ready-to-use, aqueous solution intended for 22 SUBCUTANEOUS administration only. Each sterile, pre-filled syringe contains 250 Ganirelix PI 1 23 mg/0.5 mL of ganirelix acetate, 0.1 mg glacial acetic acid, 23.5 mg mannitol, and water for 24 injection adjusted to pH 5.0 with acetic acid, NF and/or sodium hydroxide, NF. 25 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 26 The pulsatile release of GnRH stimulates the synthesis and secretion of luteinizing 27 hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The frequency of LH pulses in 28 the mid and late follicular phase is approximately 1 pulse per hour. These pulses can be 29 detected as transient rises in serum LH.
    [Show full text]
  • EC313-A Tissue Selective SPRM Reduces the Growth and Proliferation of Uterine Fbroids in a Human Uterine Fbroid Tissue Xenograft Model Hareesh B
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN EC313-a tissue selective SPRM reduces the growth and proliferation of uterine fbroids in a human uterine fbroid tissue xenograft model Hareesh B. Nair1*, Bindu Santhamma1, Kalarickal V. Dileep2, Peter Binkley3, Kirk Acosta1, Kam Y. J. Zhang 2, Robert Schenken3 & Klaus Nickisch1 Uterine fbroids (UFs) are associated with irregular or excessive uterine bleeding, pelvic pain or pressure, or infertility. Ovarian steroid hormones support the growth and maintenance of UFs. Ulipristal acetate (UPA) a selective progesterone receptor (PR) modulator (SPRM) reduce the size of UFs, inhibit ovulation and lead to amenorrhea. Recent liver toxicity concerns with UPA, diminished enthusiasm for its use and reinstate the critical need for a safe, efcacious SPRM to treat UFs. In the current study, we evaluated the efcacy of new SPRM, EC313, for the treatment for UFs using a NOD-SCID mouse model. EC313 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in the fbroid xenograft weight (p < 0.01). Estradiol (E2) induced proliferation was blocked signifcantly in EC313-treated xenograft fbroids (p < 0.0001). Uterine weight was reduced by EC313 treatment compared to UPA treatment. ER and PR were reduced in EC313-treated groups compared to controls (p < 0.001) and UPA treatments (p < 0.01). UF specifc desmin and collagen were markedly reduced with EC313 treatment. The partial PR agonism and no signs of unopposed estrogenicity makes EC313 a candidate for the long-term treatment for UFs. Docking studies have provided a structure based explanation for the SPRM activity of EC313. Te unmet need for medical management of uterine fbroids (UFs) has led to the discovery of various novel agents in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Obseva's Linzagolix Blooms but Safety Questions Remain
    December 09, 2019 Obseva’s linzagolix blooms but safety questions remain Joanne Fagg Obseva is further behind the competition in uterine fibroids but the company’s gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist linzagolix could have the edge clinically. Results from the phase III Primrose 2 trial showed a placebo-adjusted 65% response rate for a high dose of linzagolix in combination with hormonal add- back therapy (ABT), putting it in the same league as Abbvie’s Orilissa, and slightly better than Myovant’s Relugolix, cross-trial caveats notwithstanding. The pull for linzagolix is a low dose option without ABT; ABT is needed to counteract the menopause-like symptoms associated with GnRH inhibition but has side effects of its own and is not advised in patients with high BMI, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The company described a 27% placebo adjusted response rate for the low dose as “clinically relevant”, saying it could open up linzagolix as a first-line treatment. One potential hurdle is safety: bone loss points to greater levels than with competing projects, though Obseva claims that patient demographics could explain this. A second pivotal study, Primrose 1, will need to confirm this profile for a filing to occur next year. Tiny Obseva has its work cut out to catch up in this space, however. Cross-trial comparison of GnRH inhibitors in uterine fibroids Linzagolix Orilissa Relugolix (Obseva) (Abbvie) (Myovant) Elaris Elaris Liberty Primrose 2 Liberty 2 UF-1 UF-2 1 100mg daily 200mg 300mg 300mg 40mg 40mg w/o daily* bid* bid* daily* daily* ABT Placebo- adjusted 27% 65% 60% 66% 55% 57% response rate Placebo- adjusted bone - - - - -2.50% -0.45% mineral 1.81% 0.55% 0.55% 0.41% density change *Doses with ABT; bid=twice daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Obseva Needs More to Beat Abbvie in Endometriosis
    June 19, 2018 Obseva needs more to beat Abbvie in endometriosis Madeleine Armstrong Obseva, lagging behind its bigger rival Abbvie in the oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist space, has a clear mission. The smaller company’s candidate, linzagolix, will need to show best-in-class efficacy if it is to have a chance of competing with Abbvie’s elagolix, which could hit the market this year in its first indication, endometriosis-associated pain. Obseva believes that it has gone some way to proving linzagolix’s superiority with data from the small phase IIb Edelweiss trial in the same disorder, and investors sent the group’s stock up 23% yesterday in response. But a look at how the results stack up against data from elagolix’s pivotal trials suggests some cause for concern (see table below). Of course, cross-trial comparisons should always be treated with caution, and this one is particularly fraught with difficulty, as the studies used different endpoints. But on the most similar measure, response on non- menstrual pain, linzagolix appears to fall short, particularly at the highest dose used, 200mg. Cross-trial comparison of linzagolix and elagolix Placebo 50mg 75mg 100mg 150mg 200mg Linzagolix/OBE2109: Edelweiss (phase IIb, NCT02778399) Response rate (primary endpoint)* 35% 49% 62% 56% - 56% P value - 0.155 0.003 0.039 - 0.034 Response rate, nonmenstrual pain 37% 46% 59% 62% - 48% P value - 0.38 0.017 0.022 - 0.297 Elagolix: Elaris EM-I, Elaris EM-II (phase III, NCT01620528, NCT01931670) Response rate, nonmenstrual pain 37% - - - 50%** 55-58%** *Response defined as reduction of ≥30% in combined menstrual and non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 12; **p<0.003; Source: Company presentations; NEJM paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Antagonists in Poor-Responder Patients
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY௡ VOL. 80, SUPPL. 1, JULY 2003 Copyright ©2003 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Published by Elsevier Inc. Printed on acid-free paper in U.S.A. Antagonists in poor-responder patients Alan B. Copperman, M.D. Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York Objective: To review treatment options for poor-responding patients who are undergoing infertility treatment. Design: Review article and case studies. Results: A comprehensive determination of potential ovarian response for the poor-responding patient is important in the individualization of treatment options for these patients. Treatment options include both the microdose flare leuprolide acetate and GnRH antagonist stimulation protocols. For GnRH antagonist stimu- lation protocols, individualization of treatment includes use of oral contraceptive pretreatment and alterations in duration of gonadotropin stimulation and start day of antagonist administration. Conclusions: For poor-responding patients, the benefits of using GnRH antagonists for the suppression of premature LH surges plus the determination that stimulation protocols that include GnRH antagonists are at least as good as the microdose flare and provide better cycle outcomes than the long luteal leuprolide acetate down-regulation protocols have the potential to bring changes to the existing protocols for ovarian stimulation. (Fertil Steril௡ 2003;80(Suppl 1):S16–24. ©2003 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) Key Words: Ganirelix, GnRH antagonist, poor ovarian response, treatment options Individualization of stimulation regimens, ment modalities in COH, it is also important to prospective analysis of ovarian reserve, and have a clear understanding of inclusion criteria setting defined goals regarding ovarian re- for the poor-responder patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Ganirelix Acetate Injection, Solution Organon USA Inc
    GANIRELIX ACETATE- ganirelix acetate injection, solution Organon USA Inc. ---------- Ganirelix Acetate Injection FOR SUBCUTANEOUS USE ONLY DESCRIPTION Ganirelix Acetate Injection is a synthetic decapeptide with high antagonistic activity against naturally occurring gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Ganirelix Acetate is derived from native GnRH with substitutions of amino acids at positions 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 10 to form the following molecular formula of the peptide: N-acetyl-3-(2-naphthyl)-D-alanyl-4-chloro-D-phenylalanyl-3-(3-pyridyl)-D- alanyl-L-seryl-L-tyrosyl-N9,N10-diethyl-D-homoarginyl-L-leucyl-N9,N10-diethyl-L-homoarginyl-L- prolyl-D-alanylamide acetate. The molecular weight for Ganirelix Acetate is 1570.4 as an anhydrous free base. The structural formula is as follows: Ganirelix Acetate Ganirelix Acetate Injection is supplied as a colorless, sterile, ready-to-use, aqueous solution intended for SUBCUTANEOUS administration only. Each single dose, sterile, prefilled syringe contains 250 mcg/0.5 mL of Ganirelix Acetate, 0.1 mg glacial acetic acid, 23.5 mg mannitol, and water for injection adjusted to pH 5.0 with acetic acid, NF and/or sodium hydroxide, NF. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY The pulsatile release of GnRH stimulates the synthesis and secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The frequency of LH pulses in the mid and late follicular phase is approximately 1 pulse per hour. These pulses can be detected as transient rises in serum LH. At midcycle, a large increase in GnRH release results in an LH surge. The midcycle LH surge initiates several physiologic actions including: ovulation, resumption of meiosis in the oocyte, and luteinization.
    [Show full text]