3 Risk Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3 Risk Assessment 3 RISK ASSESSMENT 44 CFR Requirement §201.6(c)(2): [The plan shall include] A risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy to reduce losses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from identified hazards. The risk assessment process identifies and profiles relevant hazards and assesses the exposure of lives, property, and infrastructure to these hazards. The goal of the risk assessment is to estimate the potential loss in Reno County, including loss of life, personal injury, property damage, and economic loss, from a hazard event. The risk assessment process allows communities in Reno County to better understand their potential risk from natural and man-made hazards and provides a framework for developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to reduce risk from future hazard events. The risk assessment for Reno County and its jurisdictions followed the methodology described in the FEMA publication 386-2, Understanding Your Risks: Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses (2002), which includes a four-step process: • Identify Hazards • Profile Hazard Events • Inventory Assets • Estimate Losses This chapter is divided into four parts: hazard identification, hazard profiles, vulnerability assessment, and summary of key issues: • Section 3.1 Hazard Identification identifies the hazards that threaten the planning area and describes why some hazards have been omitted from further consideration. • Section 3.2 Hazard Profiles describes the location in the planning area, previous occurrences of hazard events, probability of future occurrence, and potential magnitude or severity for each identified hazard. • Section 3.3 Vulnerability Assessment assesses the County’s total exposure to natural and man-made hazards, considering critical facilities and other community assets at risk, and assessing growth and development trends. This section also describes vulnerability and estimates potential losses to structures in identified hazard areas, and addresses land use and development trends. This section includes steps 3 and 4 from above. Reno County, Kansas 3.1 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan FINAL DRAFT 3.1 Hazard Identification Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i): [The risk assessment shall include a] description of the type…of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. 3.1.1 Methodology The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC) reviewed data and discussed the impacts of each of the hazards recommended by FEMA for consideration, which are listed alphabetically below: • Avalanche • Hurricane • Coastal Erosion • Land Subsidence / Sinkhole • Coastal Storm • Landslide • Dam and Levee Failure • Severe Winter Storm • Drought • Tornado • Earthquake • Tsunami • Expansive Soils • Volcano • Extreme Heat • Wildfire • Flood • Windstorm • Hailstorm In addition to reviewing the hazards recommended by FEMA for consideration, the HMPC also considered the following additional hazards that were included in the State of Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan: • Agricultural Infestation • Expansive Soils • Fog • Hazardous Materials • Major Disease Outbreak • Soil Erosion & Dust • Utility/Infrastructure Failure Data on the past impacts and future probability of these hazards in the Reno County planning area was collected from the following sources: • Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan (November 2007) • Reno County Hazards Analysis Plan (August 2002) • Information on past hazard events from the Spatial Hazard Event and Loss Database (SHELDUS), a component of the University of South Carolina Hazards Research Lab that compiles county-level hazard data for 18 different natural hazard event types Reno County, Kansas 3.2 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan FINAL DRAFT • Information on past extreme weather and climate events from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) • Disaster declaration history from FEMA, the Public Entity Risk Institute, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency Disaster Declarations • Information provided by members of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee • Various articles and publications available on the internet (sources are indicated where data is cited) The HMPC eliminated some hazards from further profiling because they do not occur in the planning area or their impacts were not considered significant in relation to other hazards. Table 3.1 lists these hazards and provides a brief explanation for their elimination. Table 3.1 Hazards Not Profiled in the Plan Hazard Explanation for Omission Avalanche There are no mountains in the planning area. Coastal Erosion Planning area is not near coastal areas. Coastal Storm Planning area is not near coastal areas. Hurricane Planning area is not near coastal areas. Tsunami Planning area is not near coastal areas. Volcano There are no volcanic mountains in the planning area. Radiological Manmade hazard not profiled Terrorism Manmade hazard not profiled The HMPC identified 20 natural and man-made hazards that significantly affect the planning area and organized these hazards to be consistent with the Kansas Hazard Mitigation Plan (2007). These hazards are listed below and profiled in further detail in the next sections. • Agricultural Infestation • Hazardous Materials • Dam and Levee Failure • Land Subsidence/Sinkhole • Drought • Landslide • Disease Outbreak • Lightning • Earthquake • Soil Erosion and Dust • Expansive Soils • Tornado • Extreme Heat • Utility/Infrastructure Failure • Flood • Wildfire • Fog • Windstorm • Hailstorm • Winter Storm Multi-Jurisdictional Risk Assessment For this multi-jurisdictional plan, the risk assessment assesses each jurisdiction’s risks where they deviate from the risks facing the entire planning area. Reno County is a large County geographically (1,254 square miles) and is fairly uniform in terms of climate and topography as Reno County, Kansas 3.3 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan FINAL DRAFT well as construction characteristics and development trends. Accordingly, overall hazards and vulnerability do not vary greatly across the planning area for most hazards. Weather-related hazards, such as drought, extreme heat, hailstorm, lightning, tornado, windstorm, and winter storm, affect the entire planning area. In addition, as the individual hazard profiles reveal, the hazards of agricultural infestation, soil erosion and dust, expansive soils, land subsidence, and earthquake also affect the entire planning area and all participating jurisdictions with relatively the same level of risk. The hazards that do vary across the planning area include dam and levee failure, flood, and wildfire. In Section 3.1, Hazard Identification, Table 3.2 indicates with a checkmark that all jurisdictions in the planning area have some risk to each of the hazards profiled in this plan. In Section 3.2, Hazard Profiles, the Geographic Location section discusses how the hazard varies among jurisdictions across the planning area. The Previous Occurrences section lists the best available data on where past events have occurred and the associated losses to particular jurisdictions. Section 3.2.2 Community Asset Inventory, describes critical facilities and other community assets by jurisdiction. Section 3.3.3 Vulnerability by Hazard, identifies structures and estimates potential losses by jurisdiction where data is available and hazard areas are identified for hazards of moderate and high planning significance. The previous chapter, Chapter 2 Planning Area Profile and Capabilities, discussed the existing mitigation capabilities of each jurisdiction, such as plans and policies, personnel, and financial resources, which are currently used to reduce hazard losses. For the school districts that participated in the development of this plan, specific assets are included in the city or county maps and risk assessments in which those specific assets are located. Please refer to the school district maps in chapter 2 as a reference for school district boundaries. For school districts, the risk goes beyond the school buildings themselves as hazards can affect their tax base, the resident locations of attending students, bus routes, etc. With all of these considerations, all hazards that affect the city and or county areas that the school district boundaries overlap also apply to the school districts that occur within those boundaries. Please also note that while South Hutchinson and Turon did not officially participate in the development of this plan, the risk assessment provides information on these geographic areas to ensure the entire planning area within Reno County is assessed as school district boundaries cross in to these two cities. Reno County, Kansas 3.4 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan FINAL DRAFT Table 3.2 Hazards Identified for Each Participating Jurisdiction n o s n i y e k i t h r n c o n i t o n a o u e n u e r r s n l o o l o g b H n P i s o t i C r r a d v d w n a i g y e h n h e i n y l r t t o e g o c n o t t k v v l i b h t u n v r r l l n l e c e i e b r u a u i a l r o y a u Hazards R A A B H H L N P P P S S T W Agricultural V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Infestation Dam and Levee Failure V V V V Drought V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Disease Outbreak V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Earthquake V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Expansive Soils V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Extreme Heat V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Flood V V V V V V V V V V V Fog V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Hailstorm V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Hazardous V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Materials Land Subsidence/ V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Sinkhole Landslide V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Lightning V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Soil Erosion and Dust V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Tornado V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Utility Failure V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Wildfire V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Windstorm V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Winter Storm V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V 3.1.2 Disaster Declaration History One method used by the HMPC to identify hazards was to examine events that triggered federal and/or state disaster declarations.
Recommended publications
  • Keller Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
    id46554968 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com Keller Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan “Inspiring Exemplary Cultural Landscapes” 2. City Image and Context 2.1 Introduction Recreational needs, opportunities and enjoyment are shaped by a city’s particular image, physical characteristics, history, local economy and demographics. Image determines expectation and experience; physical features provide opportunities even as they occasionally impose constraints; both cultural and natural history instruct us to treat land with respect and stewardship; demographics determine needs; economy informs us as to the possibilities. It is thus fundamental to understand the particular image and context of the City of Keller in order to address the citizens’ needs for recreation, parks and open space. This year, 2007, the City of Keller was named by Money Magazine as one of the “100 Best Places to Live”, which measures among other things: sense of community, natural setting, congestion, jobs and housing affordability. As a major contributor to “livability”, which is an overall gauge of civic vitality, the park system plays a major role in shaping the City’s image. In perhaps an unexpected way, it is often the mundane and everyday features, both natural and man-made, that, when consciously treated in a celebratory manner, have the greatest impact on a community scale, taking people out of the vacuous “norm” by creating a sense of place. More and more, a variety of professions including health care, psychology, education and city planning recognizes the value of the presence of nature in the urban environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Profile for Pasture/Rangeland in Kansas
    Crop Profile for Pasture/Rangeland in Kansas Prepared: April, 2001 Revised: November 2003 General Production Information Kansas was ranked 8th in all other hay (excluding alfalfa) production in the United States. The state contributed 4.5% to the total U.S. production behind TX, MO, KY, TN, OS, OK, and AR. Total production for all other hay was more than 3.4 million tons, down 90,000 tons from 2001. Acres harvested at more than 2.3 million acres were down 100,000 acres from 2001. Statewide, the yield for all other hay averaged 1.5 compared with 1.6 ton per acre in 2001. Yearly average price was $65.0 per ton The Crop Profile/PMSP database, including this document, is supported by USDA NIFA. in 2001, producing a farm value of more than $249.6 million. Over time, average acreage of rangeland in Kansas is 17.1 million acres. Most of the 2.24 million acres of pasture in Kansas include smooth bromegrass, tall fescue, and bermudagrass. There are 3 to 6 million acres of annual forage in Kansas that include cereal grains, crop residue, and summer annuals. Production Regions In 2001, the east central region led the state in total all other hay production with 955,000 tons, followed by southeastern (785,000 tons), and northeastern regions (553,000 tons). These regions combined accounted for more than 59.7% of Kansas all other hay production in Kansas. The southwestern region produced the lowest amount with 127,000 tons. Production per acre ranged from 0.6 tons in Elk County, in region 90, to 3.2 tons per acre in Ellis County, in region 50.
    [Show full text]
  • SRP1159 2020 Kansas Performance Tests with Corn Hybrids
    2020 Kansas Performance Tests with Corn Hybrids dryland short-season dryland irrigated Report of Progress 1159 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service TABLE OF CONTENTS 2020 Corn Crop Review Statewide Growing Conditions and Weather................................... ........................................................................ 1 2020 Temperatures by District Table 1 ......................................................................................... 1 2020 Performance Tests Diseases, Insects, Objectives and Procedures ......................................................................................................... 2 Companies Entering 2020 Tests Table 2 ........................................................................................... 3 Northeast Dryland Manhattan, Riley County Table 3 ..........................................................................................4 Severance, Doniphan County Table 4 ………….………………………………………….…….5 Onaga, Pottawatomie County Table 5 ……….…………………………………………………..6 Northeast Irrigated Manhattan, Riley County Table 6 ………….………………………………………………..7 Scandia, Republic County Table 7 ………….………………………………………………..8 Topeka, Shawnee County Table 8 ….……….……………………………………………….9 Eastern Dryland Ottawa, Franklin County Table 9 …………………………………………….……………10 Topeka, Shawnee County Table 10 ………………………….……………………………..11 Central Dryland Belleville, Republic County Table 11 …………….…………………………………………..12 Central Irrigated Abilene, Dickinson County Table 12 …………….………………………………………….13
    [Show full text]
  • FLINT HILLS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas
    FLINT HILLS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 2000 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVALS FLINT FELLS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 2000 Manager/ Refuge Supervisor Date TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. HIGHLIGHTS 1 B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS 1 C. LAND ACQUISITION 1. Fee Title Nothing To Report 2. Easements Nothing To Report 3. Other 2 D. PLANNING 1. Master Plan 3 2. Management Plans Nothing To Report 3. Public Participation Nothing To Report 4. Compliance with Environmental and Cultural Resource Mandates Nothing To Report 5. Research and Investigations ' Nothing To Report E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel ' 3 2. Youth Programs 4 3. Other Manpower Programs Nothing To Report 4. Volunteer Programs 4 5. Funding 4 6. Safety • 5 7. Technical Assistance ...'. Nothing To Report 8. Other Items Nothing To Report F. HABITAT MANAGEMENT 1. General Nothing To Report 2. Wetlands 5 3. Forests 6 4. Cropland 6 5. Grasslands 7 6. Other Habitats 8 7. Grazing Nothing To Report 8. Haying Nothing To Report 9. Fire Management 8 10. Pest Control 10 11. Water Rights 10 12. Wilderness and Special Areas Nothing To Report 13. WPA Easement Monitoring Nothing To Report G. WILDLIFE 1. Wildlife Diversity Nothing To Report 2. Endangered and/or Threatened Species 12 3. Waterfowl 12 4. Marsh and Water Birds ' 13 5. Shorebirds, Gulls, Terns and Allied Species 13 6. Raptors 14 7. Other Migratory Birds 14 8. Game Mammals 14 9. Marine Mammals Nothing To Report 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Flint Hills, Cross Timbers, and Verdigris River Valley Field Guide
    2010 Kansas Field Conference June 2–4, 2010 Flint Hills, Cross Timbers, and Verdigris River Valley Water/Energy Nexus Rangeland and Stream-Corridor Management Field Guide Edited by Shane A. Lyle Catherine S. Evans Robert S. Sawin Rex C. Buchanan This project is operated by the Kansas Geological Survey and funded, in part, by the Kansas Water Offi ce, the Kansas Department of Transportation, and the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Kansas Geological Survey Geology Extension The University of Kansas 1930 Constant Avenue Lawrence, KS 66047–3724 KGS Open-fi le Telephone: 785–864–3965 Report 2010–8 www.kgs.ku.edu CN RA DC NT PL SM JW RP WS MS NM BR DP AT SH CD TH SD GH RO OB MC CY RL PT JA JF LV OT SN LC WB WY WA LG GO TR EL RS DK GE DG JO SA EW MR OS GL WH LY FR MI SC LE NS RH BT MP MN RC CS CF AN LN HM PN KE FI HG SF RN HV BU GW AL GY ED WO BB FO SG ST PR GT HS KW KM WL NO CR EK ME CA MT BA SU CL SV SW CM HP MG LB CK CQ 1 2 4 3 10 9 8 5 6 7 Wednesday, June 2 Thursday, June 3 Friday, June 4 Stops 1 – 4 Stops 5 – 8 Stops 9 – 10 2010 Field Conference Flint Hills, Cross Timbers, and Verdigris River Valley Water/Energy Nexus Rangeland and Stream-Corridor Management June 2 – 4, 2010 Contents Conference Participants Participants List ........................................................................................................1 - 1 Biographical Information ..........................................................................................1 - 2 Kansas Field Conference 2010 Field Conference Overview “Flint Hills, Cross Timbers,
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory KANSAS
    120 Congressional Directory KANSAS KANSAS (Population 1995, 2,565,000) SENATORS SAM BROWNBACK, Republican, of Topeka, KS; born in Garrett, KS, September 12, 1956; graduated, Prairie View High School, 1974; B.S. with honors, Kansas State University, Manhat- tan, KS, 1978; J.D., University of Kansas, Lawrence, 1982; Kansas bar; attorney, broadcaster, teacher; U.S. House of Representatives, 1994±96; State Secretary of Agriculture, 1986±93; White House Fellow, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, 1990±91; member: Topeka Fel- lowship Council, Kansas Bar Association, Kansas State University and Kansas University alum- ni associations; married the former Mary Stauffer, 1982; three children: Abby, Andy, and Liz; committees: Governmental Affairs; Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Foreign Relations; Joint Economic; subcommittees: chair, Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring, and the District of Columbia; Aviation; Communications; Consumer Affairs, Foreign Com- merce, and Tourism; Manufacturing and Competitiveness; Near Eastern and South Asian Af- fairs; elected to the U.S. Senate in November 1996, to fill the remainder of the vacancy caused by the resignation of former Senator Bob Dole. Office Listings http://www.senate.gov/∼brownback/ [email protected] 303 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 ......................................... 224±6521 Chief of Staff.ÐTim McGivern. FAX: 228±1265 Scheduler.ÐEmily Wellman. Legislative Director.ÐPaul Ryan. Communications Director.ÐBob Murray. 612 South Kansas, Topeka, KS 66603 ........................................................................ (913) 233±2503 FAX: 233±2616 1001±C North Broadway, Pittsburg, KS 66762 .......................................................... (316) 231±6040 FAX: 231±6347 225 Nort Market, Suite 120, Wichita, KS 67202 ........................................................ (316) 264±8066 FAX: 264±9078 11111 West 95th, Suite 245, Overland Park, KS 66214 ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • KS State Parks Guide Booklet
    KKaannssaass SSttaattee PPaarrkkss Cross Timbers State Park KaMnosreaTshaSn MteaettseThPe aEyre ks: he Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks manages 24 state parks across the state. Most provide utility and primitive camping, and access to reservoirs, trails, and wildlife areas. A few Tare preserved natural areas, allowing visitors to enjoy unspoiled wild Kansas. Many parks host annual events such as concerts, festivals, and com - petitions. Whatever your outdoor interest — hiking, camping, wildlife observation, fishing, bike riding, horseback riding, hunting, or just plain relaxing, a Kansas state park has what you’re looking for. If you’ve never been to a Kansas state park, use this guide to find the nearest one. Visit our website for current park fees at www.kdwp.state.ks.us or call one of the offices listed in the back of this publica - tion. If you haven’t visited a state park recently, look again. There’s a rich collection of outdoor adventures waiting for you. Cross Timbers State Park El Dorado State Park 2 ) (B S P ) A - Available U (B K S S O P B - Available at extra charge O U E H K S C - Limited times . O K N ) C C O ) ) R O (B I LE H B (B A TI D - Fishing boats only S E ( S A ) L V IC Y S E S S M T B A A & R L E T ) E K ) D S S ( IC H E - In non-state areas R E , T N IT I (B E N C (B N E S C R R C O S S S A N A S G N TR A E A E E E P U L O L O L U IN I E S F W L L Y L M D A I L O B C B S E O E E A IT B A O P Y T T A N A E R S IC L A C H M S N A C H A C L G C R , & I V - R A E G E T I R E L E IN A E R R R T R A E R T IN R
    [Show full text]
  • KDOT District and Area Contact Information
    KDOT District and Area Contact Information Headquarters Engineer Bureau of Maintenance, 700 SW Harrison Street,Dale Kirmer loor Staff 700 SW Harrison Street (785) ‐ 8th F Topeka, Kansas 66603‐3745 296 6355 [email protected] 1 – Horton Area 2 – KC Metro South/Olathe 1686 1st Ave East 1290 South Enterprise Horton, KS 66439 Olathe, KS 66061 (785) 486‐2142 Phone (913) 764‐4525 Phone (785) 486‐3788 Fax (913) 764‐7409 Fax KDOT#[email protected] KDOT#[email protected] District 1 – Northeast Kansas Area 3 – KC Metro North/Bonner Springs Area 4 – Topeka 650 N K‐7 Hwy 101 Gage Blvd District Engineer ‐ Topeka Bonner Springs, KS 66012 Topeka, KS 66606 121 S.W. 21 St Street (913) 721‐2754 Phone (785) 296‐3986 Phone Topeka, Kansas 66612‐1429 (913) 721‐2873 Fax (785) 296‐1096 Fax Phone: (785) 296‐3881 KDOT#[email protected] KDOT#[email protected] Click HERE to see Revised Area Boundaries Area 5 – Wamego 1425 W US‐24 Wamego, KS 66547 (785) 456‐2353 Phone (785) 456‐9851 Fax KDOT#[email protected] District 2 ‐ North Central Kansas Area 1 – Clay Center Area 2 – Mankato 731 W Crawford 725 East South St District Engineer ‐ Salina Clay Center, KS 67432 Mankato, KS 66956 1006 N. Third (785) 632‐3108 Phone (785) 378‐3166 Phone Salina, Kansas 67402‐0857 (785) 632‐3337 Fax (785) 378‐3800 Fax Phone: (785) 823‐3754 KDOT#[email protected] KDOT#[email protected] Click HERE to see Area Boundaries 1 | Pa g e District 2 ‐ North Central Kansas Area 3 – Marion Area 4 – Ellsworth 1021 N Cedar St 202 W 15th District Engineer ‐ Salina Marion, KS 66861 Ellsworth, KS 67439 1006 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Pike in the Kansas Flint Hills, 1806
    Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press 2009 – Discovering this Place (Marty White, Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal Editor) Pike in the Kansas Flint Hills, 1806 Leo E. Oliva Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/sfh Recommended Citation Oliva, Leo E. (2009). "Pike in the Kansas Flint Hills, 1806," Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal. https://newprairiepress.org/sfh/2009/flinthills/4 To order hard copies of the Field Journals, go to shop.symphonyintheflinthills.org. The Field Journals are made possible in part with funding from the Fred C. and Mary R. Koch Foundation. This is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. _J I • L I EUT E NAN T ZE BULON MONTGO M ER Y PIK E J4 1 1 _J I IL PJ,e, wt, th, k~ +W-!f4 !806 Zebulon Montgomery Pike was the first U.S. Army explorer to cross the present state of Kansas during his 1806~ 1807 expedition to the American Southwest. Although his primary m1ss1ons, established for him by General James Wilkinson, were accomplished in other present states (return of Osage Indians to their homes in western Missouri, visit with Pawnee Indians ========\ ======== in southern Nebraska, find the source the Missouri Valley and northern Mexico of the Arkansas River in Colorado, and and leading to the Santa Fe Trail).
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Eastern Red Cedar of the Oklahoma Cross Timbers
    An Ancient Red Cedar Woodland in the Oklahoma Cross Timbers An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors Studies in Geology By Jesse R. Edmondson 2006 Geology J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences The University of Arkansas Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dave Stahle and Dan Griffin for their constant mentoring and friendship over the past three years. Dave Stahle took me in as a confused undergraduate student and gave me great motivation and a passion for old-growth forest. I quickly became interested in dendrochronology and have been hooked ever since. Dan Griffin has been a great colleague and friend and I will be forever in debt to the countless hours he has helped me with making beautiful maps and figures. Malcolm Cleaveland has also been very helpful and has taught me a great deal. I would also like to thank everyone else at the University of Arkansas Tree-Ring Laboratory that I have had the pleasure to work with over the past years, especially: Dorian Burnette, Stephen James, Jackson Jennings, Mark Spond, and Richard Styron for their help on this project. I would like to thank the University of Arkansas Honors College for financial assistance with this project. They provided an undergraduate research grant for 1-year of work on this project. I also appreciate the Oklahoma Nature Conservancy and the city of Sand Springs Dept. of Parks and Recreation for their permission to conduct research at the Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve. Finally, I would like to thank my grandfather, R.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Affiliated Employers
    Affiliated Employers Organization KPERS KP&F Judges Grand Total State Employers Adjutant Generals Office 232 25 257 Administrative Hearings 10 10 Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board 9 9 Board of Accountancy 3 3 Board of Barber Examiners 3 3 Board of Emergency Medical Services 12 12 Board of Nursing 23 23 Board of Optometry Examiners 1 1 Board of Tax Appeals 12 12 Board of Technical Professions 4 4 Board of Veterinary Examiners 4 4 Citizens Utility Ratepayers Board 6 6 Dept for Children and Families 2218 2218 Dept of Administration 384 384 Dept of Agriculture 308 308 Dept of Corrections 464 464 Dept of Health & Environment 1375 1375 Dept of Labor 412 412 Dept of Revenue 1011 1011 Dept of Transportation 2085 2085 Division of Post Audit 26 26 El Dorado Correctional Facility 443 443 Ellsworth Correctional Facility 197 197 Emporia State University 206 9 215 Fort Hays State University 199 10 209 Governmental Ethics Commission 8 8 Health Care Stabilization Fund 21 21 Hutchinson Correctional Facility 470 470 Insurance Dept 119 119 Judicial Branch 1449 259 1708 Judicial Council 4 4 Kansas Board of Regents 15 15 Kansas Bureau of Investigation 230 89 319 Kansas Comm on Veterans Affairs Office 261 261 Kansas Corporation Commission 154 154 Kansas Dental Board 2 2 Kansas Dept for Aging and Disability Services 222 222 Kansas Dept of Commerce 259 259 Kansas Dept of Wildlife Parks and Tourism 432 432 Kansas Development Finance Authority 7 7 Kansas Highway Patrol 258 475 733 Kansas Historical Society 57 57 Kansas Housing Resource Corporation 48 48 Kansas
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2014 Volume 8, Number 3
    Summer 2014 VOLUME 8, NUMBER 3 FROM OUR COLLECTIONS 2 The Kansas Historical Foundation is the non-profit organization that supports and Treasure Hunters: promotes Kansas history through the work of the Kansas Historical Society, the state agency. This issue highlights a new joint tour program that goes on the road Miners of Southeast Kansas to highlight unique aspects of Kansas history and culture. 6 “University in Print”: A Taste of Southeast Kansas Girard’s Little Blue Books ansans love a good road trip to delve into the hidden 10 stories and rich diversity of the different parts of the Fire Devil: 788th Company, K Civilian Conservation Corps state. A Taste of Southeast Kansas presented September 19-20, 2014, marks the first in a new exciting program opportunity for Kansans and travelers to experience the sights, sounds, and tastes of Kansas, and, of course, the Departments history and culture of a region. Featured Program ...........1 This issue provides the backstory for the exciting and A Taste of Southeast Kansas ...4 delectable stops on this year's tour. What better way to Real People. Real Stories. .....8 experience the cultural heritage than through food? Witness to History...........9 People from Italy were among those to join the mining workforce in the Curator’s Choice ...........12 area, which boasts a number of local Italian restaurants. Frontenac Bakery is more than 100 years old. Locals love the delicious baked bread and large Calendar .................13 cinnamon rolls. On the cover: Join Patrick Zollner, Jennie Chinn, and Terry Marmet for A Taste of Southeast Kansas, September 19-20, 2014.
    [Show full text]