Special Libraries, February 1912 Special Libraries Association
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Special Libraries, 1912 Special Libraries, 1910s 2-1-1912 Special Libraries, February 1912 Special Libraries Association Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1912 Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons, and the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation Special Libraries Association, "Special Libraries, February 1912" (1912). Special Libraries, 1912. Book 2. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1912/2 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Libraries, 1910s at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Libraries, 1912 by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Special Libraries -- Vol. 3 FEBRUARY 19 12 No. 2 -- PUBLISHED BY TI3E (c) Bibliographic Work.--Preparation SPECIAL LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION of special lists of references on subjects of Monthly except July nnd Angust. current interest to the legislator, with such Edltorlal and Publlcntlon Office. State LlbMrY.-. Indianapolis, 1nd: criticaI and analytical notes as can readily Bubscrlptlons, 03 Broad street. Boston, Mass. be made, Involving search for titles in Entered at the Postofece... at Iudlananolls.. Ind.. prlnted catalogues of various libraries, aa second-class mitt&. bibliographies, indexes to periodicals, etc., Subscription. ...$2.602-yeafl10-numbs) and acquisition of publicatio~lsof import- ance Pound to be wanting. Single- couies ...................-- -26 cents Presldent ..................Robert H. Whltten 2. Indeucs, Compilations, nnd Digests of Publlc Bervlce Commlsslon, New York Clty. Vice-Presldent ............Herbert 0. Brlghnm Laws, Etc. Rhode Islaud State Llbrnrr. (a) Indexes.-Detailed indexing of stat- Secretary-Trensurer ............ Guy B. Mnrlon utes, Court rel~orts,Government documents, Llbrnry, Althur D. Llttle, Inc., 93 Rrottd St. etc., of this and other countries to locate Boaton. Mass. esactly by volume and pnge the text of EXECUTIVE BOARD laws on special subjects, decisions of the Prealdent, Vice-President Secrctnry-Trensurrer, George W. Lee, Stone k Webster, Boston; W. courts interpreting them, administrative P. Cutter, Englneerlng Societies, N. Y. regulations, and statistical or other infor- Managlng Editor of Special Llbrnrles .--John A. mation showing the results of their opera- Lapp, State Librnry, Indiunnpolis. Ind. tion, to enable comparison to be made be- Asslstnnt Fd~tor. Ethel ('lelnnil. Stnle Llhrary.-. IndInnii[~olls, Jcl tween the laws of various countries. An appropriation of $28,000 to enable A Congreeslonnl Leglslatlve Reference Devartment. 13 Select References on the Pardoning Power: Federal the Library of Congress to prepare an in- and State ... .........................16 dex of comparative legislation wan asked Works on Bill rafting .... .......... 19 for in 1902 and succeeding yeare, but not Public Utllltles References.. .................20 Current References ......... .......23 granted. Blbllogrm~hles .......................26 (b) Compilations and Digests.-Corn- -- --- piling (and translating when necessary) A CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATIVE from printed omcial sources, with the ald REFERESCE DEPARTMENT of the above index, exact legal, political, and economic inforn~ationon subjects of (From n report to Congress by Herbert current legislation, and digesting the same Putnam, Librarian of Congress.) in legislative reference bulletins for im- The work of a legislative reference bu- medmte use in drafting bills, and to enable reau may include any or all of the follow- the legislator to judge of the merits of pro- ing kinds of service, ranging from library posed laws without elaborate research. work proper to lhat which is purely leg- Tho Wisconsin comparative legislation islative Intermediate between these ex- bulletins may be cited ae examples. tremes are certain classes of work which are gpecial extensions of the ordinary ac- :3. Specid Collections. tivities of a legislative library, of direct (a) Testimony of Experts.-Collection and immediate importance for legislation. of the opinions of specialists on subjects of 1. Librnry WOI-k Proper. (a) Acquisi- current legislation or on n particular bill tion of the Literature.-This is being un- for the use of the committee to which it dertaken at the Library of Congress to an has been referred. extent lwobably unparalleled elsewhere, the (b) Press Opinions, Magazine Articles, collections of the Library (in slatutes, re- Etc.-Collection of newspaper clippings, ports, commentaries, and miscellaneous lit- articles in magazines, etc., to show the eraturc, and in the published indexes, di- state of public opinion in regard to gro- gests, and com]?ilat~onsauxiliary to the use jected legislation, and arrnngemonts of the of these) belng probably the largest extant material in convenient files for ready ref- and improved by incessant effort. erence during t,he discussions in the legis- (b) Reference Wor1r.-Selection of lature. suitable material from the general collec- 4. 1~egl;lslativeWork. tions to meet the demands of an individual (a) B111 Drafting.-Utilization of all of legislator, with the aid of the subject cat- the resources of the bureau to draft bills alogue of the Library and general refer- or amendments in accordance with definite ence works or from the reference Iibrar- instruct~onsfurnjshed by a committee, a ian's personal knowledge of the subject. group of members, or, possibly, the Execu- SPECIAL LIBRARIES tive, involving a study of the existing law as to merit, which it secures by correspond- as ~nterpretedby the courts, legislation £01' ence with experts. similar purposes In other countries, and The above work, whlch organizes and the probnble effect of the proposed enact- concentrates all the data pertinent to a ment. question in such form as to be readily re- (b) Explanatory memoranda.-haara- sponsive, is beyond the abilities of the LI- tion of synopses of b~llsand brief notes ex- brary with ~tsparent orgamzation. The planatory of their provis~ons. Library would gladly undertake it; il could undertake it without additional approprla- General Cons~derations.--The main ob- tion for the material itself, so far as this IS legislation. ject the improvement of The is 111 printed form; but ~t would require means proposed are- - for it an enlargement of its present Divi- 1. Improvement in substance by the as- slons of Law, Documents and Bibliogral)by, surance of adequate data. and in addition the creation of a new di- 2. Improvement in form through the vision under the title of a Legislative or employment of experts considering form Congressional Reference Division. alone. Indexes, Digests and Compilat~onsaf The Data.-In so far as these consist of Law.--As to the utility of such, and the printed literature in its regular forms, they qualifications requisite, I have no reason are already available to Congress in the to modify the opinions submitted with my Library of Congress, its collections (of estimates of 1902. The ensuing experieiice statutes, decisions, commentaries, and the w~ththe index to the Statutes at TJarge but n~iscellaneousliterature of stat~stic,theory confirms the ol3inion that the worlr of in- and discussion) bemg already one of the dexing the statutes, even the Federal stat- largest in the world, and undergoing im- ntes of this country, requires scientific provement without stmt. treatment by a corps of experts with a sub- A11 of the above 1s classified, catalogued stant~algeneral seducation, legal traiuing, ancl niacle to respond to any particular ancl experience in this class of work, and query, whether Prom Congress as a whole selected with regard solely to these qnnll- or any committee of Congress or any in- fications. It confirms also the expectation dividual member. Lists of references to that where the Library was charged v,%h the material (whether docun~ent, mono- such a task the men would be so selected graph, society gubhcat~on,or periodical) and the worlr 'would be scientifically ac- bearlng upon particular topics under dis- complished. cussion in Congress-exactly such lists as Such a corps once organized and experi- are issued by certain state legislative ref- enced, the economy of continuing it as a erence bureaus-are Issued by the Library permanent bureau is obvious, as, 011 the of Congress. Other such lists exist in other hancl, is the extravagance of dispers- typewritten form and are froely supplied ing it The corgs which handled this 13ar- upon request. A request, whether from ticular work on the Federal statutes would Congress or a committee, or a member for not, of course, be sufficiently large, or sim~larreferences to topics not so broadly contain the vaned accon~plishnlentsrequi- treated, is always met by the Library with- site for indexes, digests and compilations in its ab~lities.The staff of the Library in- of the various material of concern to Con- cludes men highly expert in the prepara- gress and to the Federal authorit~es;espa- tion of such lists, so Par as this is within c~allywould it be lacking in experts quali- the scope of b~bliography proper or re- fied to deal with the legislation of foreign search work of a bibliographic nature countries (the interest of which is of rela- A legislative reference bureau goes fur- tively small concern to state legislators, ther. It undertakes not merely to classify but is or increasing concern to Congress). and