THE KURDISH POLITICAL MOBILIZATION in the 1960S: the CASE of “THE EASTERN MEETINGS”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE KURDISH POLITICAL MOBILIZATION IN THE 1960s: THE CASE OF “THE EASTERN MEETINGS” A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AZAT ZANA GÜNDOAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION JULY 2005 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Feride ACAR Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assist. Prof. Kürad Erturul Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mesut Yeen Co-Supervisor Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Mesut Yeen (METU, SOC) Assist. Prof. Kürad Erturul (METU, ADM) Assist. Prof. Fahriye Üstüner (METU, ADM) Assoc. Prof. Aye Gündüz Hogör (METU, SOC) Assist. Prof. Nesim eker (METU, HIS) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Azat Zana GÜNDOAN Signature : iii ABSTRACT THE KURDISH POLITICAL MOBILIZATION IN THE 1960s: THE CASE OF “THE EASTERN MEETINGS” Gündoan, Azat Zana M.S., Department of Political Science and Public Administration Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mesut Yeen Co-Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Kürad Erturul July 2005, 155 pages This thesis examines the Kurdish political mobilization in the 1960s through focusing on the case of the Eastern Meetings. These meetings were organized by the Easterners group of the Turkish Workers Party in the various provinces in the autumn 1967 in the East and Southeast Anatolia with the aim of voicing the demands, claims and the grievances of these regions and the Kurdish population. Using the theoretical framework and the analytical tools presented by the social movements and collective action theory, this thesis examines the identity formation and mobilization processes of the Eastern Meetings and situates them within the socio-political context of the 1960s. Through this analysis, the thesis aims to draw a dynamic and relational picture of a particular moment in the history of Kurdish political activism. Keywords: Eastern Meetings, Kurdish political mobilization, social movements, collective action iv ÖZ 1960’LARDA KÜRT SYASAL MOBLZASYONU: “DOU MTNGLER” ÖRNE Gündoan, Azat Zana Master, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi : Doç.Dr. Mesut Yeen Ortak Tez Yöneticisi: Yrd.Doç. Kürad Erturul Temmuz 2005, 155 sayfa Bu tez Dou Mitingleri örnei üzerine younlamak suretiyle 1960’lı yıllarda Kürtlerin politik mobilizasyonunu inceliyor. Bu mitingler 1967 sonbaharında Türkiye çi Partisi’nin Doulular grubu tarafından Dou ve Güneydou bölgesinin çeitli illerinde, bu bölgelerin ve Kürt nüfusun taleplerini, isteklerini ve sorunlarını dile getirmek amacıyla organize edildi. Bu tez toplumsal hareketler ve kolektif eylem kuramının sunduu teorik çerçeve ve analitik gereçleri kullanarak, Dou Mitingleri’nin kimlik oluumu ve mobilizasyon süreçlerini inceler ve bu mitingleri 1960’ların sosyo-politik balamın içinde konumlandırır. Bu inceleme ile bu tez Kürtlerin siyasi aktivizm tarihindeki özel bir anın dinamik ve ilikisel bir portresini çizmeyi amaçlar. Anahtar Kelimeler: Dou Mitingleri, Kürt politik mobilizasyonu, toplumsal hareketler, kolektif eylem. v To My Parents vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Assoc. Prof. Mesut Yeen and co-supervisor Assist. Prof. Kürad Erturul for their guidance, advice, criticism, encouragements throughout the thesis. I would also like to thank the members of my jury who kindly agreed to participate in my jury and shared their valuable comments on my thesis. I have to acknowledge my debt to Prof. Dr. Günay Göksu Özdoan and Assoc. Prof. Ayhan Kaya for the academic inspiration they provided during and after my undergraduate education at Marmara University, Department of Political Science and International Relations. Their courses and academic tutorial have always been very enlightening for me. I would also like to thank Ahmed Önal whose support was so valuable in providing me a plenty of materials about my topic. I should also mention my interviewees who kindly accepted to reserve time for me and shared their memories, impressions and thoughts regarding the Eastern Meetings and the general political climate of the 1960s. My special thanks for Tarık Ziya Ekinci, Naci Kutlay, Mehmed Ali Aslan. I should also thank to Ruen Arslan who shared my enthusiasm about my topic and provided my contact with Mehmed Ali Aslan. I should also express my debt to Cemil Gündoan who kindly shared his interview with Kemal Burkay and his research on the DPTK. My thanks are also for Hashem Ahmadzadeh who sent the facsimile copies of the newspapers, Deng and Dicle-Fırat from Stockholm, Sweden. I would also like to thank my cousin Dersim Yabasun who helped me to obtain some of the materials from Amsterdam. A number of people with varying degrees and at different times have been by my side. I would like to thank my long-lived buddy Barı Menderes and the whole Menderes Family. I also express my thanks to my buddy, Süleyman vii Doan for their existence as a real friend. I would also express my thanks to Can Nacar with whom I started the academic journey. His intellectual and morale support are so important to me. I am also thankful to Delal Aydın not only for her intellectual and collaborative company but also for her empathy and sincere friendship which have always been very meaningful to me. My thanks are also for Bülent Sülolu who shared all the bad and good times with me as we were in Ankara. I would thank to my kind friend Ali Murat rat who brought me the statistical data. Burak Gürel shared some of his sources with me. My deepest thanks for him. I should also thank to Sezen and Suzan Bayhan, and Özlem Kırkım who frankly opened the doors of their warm home to me with kindness and friendship. I am also deeply indebted to my (now-enlarged) family. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my father Yaar Gündoan, my mother Meral Gündoan and my sister Ceren Cevahir Gündoan who have always believed in and unconditionally supported my efforts during my whole education life. My special thanks are also for my mother-in-law Nadide Özok for her kindness, hospitality and valuable morale support. Last, but not the least, I would like to express my warmest gratitude to my wife Nilay Özok-Gündoan who not only shared my enthusiasm about the topic of this thesis and always reminded me of its importance during the crisis moments, but also read, criticized and edited my text. Without her patience, intellectual/material support and most valuably never-ending care and encouragement she blended with love, this study could barely be realized. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM................................................................................................ iii ABSTRACT.................................................................................................... iv ÖZ................................................................................................................... v DEDICATION................................................................................................ vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................................................................. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………… ix LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………… xi LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………….. xii CHAPTER INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………... 1 I. A CRITICAL ASSESMENT OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 11 THEORIES: TOWARDS A SYNTHESIS……………………. 1.1 The Marxist Conception of Collective Action......................... 14 1.2 Collective Behavior Theory………………............................. 16 1.3 Rational Choice and Resource Mobilization…….................... 17 1.4 Political Process Perspective……………………………........ 20 1.5 New Social Movements Approach and Framing Paradigm…. 22 1.6 Toward a Synthesis………………………………………….. 25 1.7 The Framework of the Study…………………………............ 28 II. SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION, 36 NEW ACTORS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION IN THE 1960S’ TURKEY……………………………………………….. 2.1 Socio-Political Changes ………………………….……......... 37 2.2 27 May 1960: Coup D’etat…………………………………... 40 2.3 The Left and The Turkish Labor Party ……………………... 44 2.3.1 The Path Movement (Yön Hareketi)………………….. 45 2.3.2 National Democratic Revolution 47 Vs. Socialist Revolution………………………………. 2.3.3 The Turkish Labor Party……………………………... 49 2.3.4 Kurds in the TLP: The “Easterners” ………………… 57 2.4 The Groups in Contentious Politics…..…………………….. 58 ix 2.4.1 The Youth…………………………………………….. 58 2.4.2 The Labor Movement…………………………………. 64 2.4.3 The Peasants’ Land Occupations …………………….. 67 2.4.4 The Kurds...…...................…………………………… 70 III. THE EASTERN MEETINGS………………………………….. 75 3.1. Social Change, A Coup and A Revolt: 79 The Role of Environmental Mechanisms…………………… 3.1.1 Social Change and the Kurds ……................................ 79 3.1.2 A Spark From the South: The Barzani Revolt................ 83 3.1.3 49 Kurds in the Cells: 86 The Incident of 49s (49lar Olayı)……………………... 3.1.4 Tough Policies, Tough Declarations: 89 The Coup and the New Regime.....................................