Didaskalia Volume 13 Entire
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sophocles' Philoctetes Roisman, Hanna M Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1997; 38, 2; Proquest Pg
The appropriation of a son: Sophocles' Philoctetes Roisman, Hanna M Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1997; 38, 2; ProQuest pg. 127 The Appropriation of a Son: Sophocles' Philoctetes Hanna M. Roisman ANHOOD in archaic and classical Greece-as in modern times-is generally manifested not so much in relation M ships with women as in relationships with other men, especially in the relationship between father and son. The Greek male is expected to produce sons who will continue his oikos (e.g. Soph. Ant. 641-45; Eur. Ale. 62lf, 654-57). Further, as Hesiod makes clear, sons should resemble their fathers in both looks and conduct, especially the latter (Op. 182,235; ef Ii. 6.476-81; Theophr. Char. 5.5). Such resemblance earns the father public esteem and proves his manliness; the lack of it may be cause for disparagement and calls his manliness into question. 1 We learn from Ajax and Philoctetes that Sophocles follows the Hesiodic imperative that sons should resemble their fathers in their natures and their accomplishments. Ajax sees himself as an unworthy son, having lost Achilles' arms to Odysseus, and prefers to commit suicide rather than face his father, Telamon, who took part in Heracles' expedition to Troy and got Hesione, the best part of the booty, as a reward (Aj. 430-40,462-65, 470ff, 1300-303; Diod. 4.32.5). At the same time, he expects his son, Eurysaces, to be like himself in nature, valor, and in everything else ('ttl.~' aA.A.' OIlOlO~, Aj. 545-51). Sophocles' Philoctetes, on the other hand, presents the strug gle between Odysseus and Philoctetes for the 'paternity' of Neoptolemus, as each tries to mold the young man in his own 1 Even in contemporary Greece the intense male rivalry for proving oneself takes place among men alone, while women and flocks serve as the object of this rivalry. -
Read the Transcript
TRANSCRIPT Key Conversations with Phi Beta Kappa Classics Scholar Peter Meineck on How Greek Theater Trains Better Citizens The NYU's professor elaborates on how to better understand and live through today's social and moral turmoil by learning from the great theater works of antiquity. Meineck illustrates what Greek drama can teach us about understanding trauma, being informed voters, embracing difference, and what we should, and shouldn't, expect from leaders and heroes. Fred Lawrence: This podcast episode was generously funded by two anonymous donors. If you would like to support the podcast in similar ways, please contact Hadley Kelly, at [email protected]. Thanks for listening. Hello and welcome to Key Conversations with Phi Beta Kappa. I’m Fred Lawrence, Secretary and CEO of the Phi Beta Kappa Society. On our podcast, we welcome leading thinkers, visionaries, and artists who shape our collective understanding of some of today’s most pressing and consequential matters. Many of them are Phi Beta Kappa Visiting Scholars, who travel the country for us, visiting campuses and presenting free lectures that we invite you to attend. For the Visiting Scholars schedule, please visit pbk.org. Today, it’s a pleasure to welcome Dr. Peter Meineck, who holds the endowed chair of Professor of Classics in the Modern World at New York University, and is Honorary Professor of Humanities at the University of Nottingham in the UK. He specializes in ancient performance, cognitive theory, Greek literature and culture, and humanities public programming. In addition to his academic career, Dr. Meineck has worked extensively in professional theatre, founding Aquila Theatre, and has directed and produced over 50 productions of classical plays. -
1 Cciv/Clas/Thea 202: Tu/Th 10:30-11:50 Fisk
CCIV/CLAS/THEA 202: GREEK DRAMA PASSIONS AND POLITICS ON THE ATHENIAN AND MODERN STAGE SPRING 2014 TU/TH 10:30-11:50 FISK 210 Professor Eirene Visvardi [email protected] Downey 213 Office Hours: Monday 2:00-4:00 and by appointment This course will introduce students to Greek drama as produced in its original setting and adapted in modern times. Our Greek material will include tragedies by Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides along with selections from Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Poetics and Nicomachean Ethics among other texts. We will consider issues such as: What kind of artistic medium is theater when it first comes to life? What would the experience of performing and watching Greek tragedy have been like? What are the emotions of tragedy for the fictional characters and for the audience and why have we been talking about catharsis for centuries? What is the relationship between emotion and decision-making, between feeling and judging - for individuals and for groups? How does theater reflect the personal, social, religious, and political life of the Athenians? Are stage and (democratic) state in dialogue? For the last part of the course, we will turn to adaptations of Greek tragedy in the 17th-21st centuries to examine how similar questions/issues are replayed and revised in response to changing social and political circumstances such as the Second World War, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and immigration and homelessness in contemporary NYC among others. REQUIRED TEXTS P. Woodruff (1998) Euripides Bacchae. Hackett P. Burian and A. Shapiro (2011) The Complete Aeschylus: Volume I: The Oresteia (Greek Tragedy in New Translations). -
Neoptolemus: the Making of a Cruel Warrior
Neoptolemus: The Making of a Cruel Warrior. Thanks to Schein’s recent commentary (2013), Sophocles’ Philoctetes has been given a fresh perspective. Taking Schein’s comments on Heracles’ cautionary words to Neoptolemus at the end of the play as a starting point, this paper argues that Sophocles constructs the character of Neoptolemus based on his later involvement in the sack of Troy. It presents a departure from the trend of reading Philoctetes in the context of contemporary Athens (as compellingly presented in, for example, Scodel 2012) and instead presents Neoptolemus as a character in direct engagement with his own complex mythological heritage. In particular, it argues that Neoptolemus’ later (moral) savage behaviour is foreshadowed in Philoctetes in a way that mirrors the (physical) savagery of Philoctetes himself and his wound that has been noted as a significant aspect of this play (Segal, 1995; Worman 2000). Neoptolemus is an ephebic youth in Philoctetes, struggling to understand himself and his place within the Greek army (for example, Allan, 2001). After Heracles’ intervention ex machina, it is understood that both Philoctetes and Neoptolemus will return to Troy, but lingering in Heracles’ words is the unsettling foreshadowing of Neoptolemus’ behaviour in Troy during the sack. For an audience familiar with the tradition, this warning against bad behaviour would not have come as a surprise. This paper argues that the later incarnation of Neoptolemus was meant to be central in the audience’s mind throughout Philoctetes. Building on the work of Fuqua (1976) and Davidson (1995), the paper argues for the importance of mythological tradition in the interpretation Neoptolemus in Philoctetes. -
Sophocles: Philoctetes’ In: the Literary Encyclopedia (Published Version)
Citation: Paillard, Elodie. "Philoctetes". The Literary Encyclopedia. 8 August 2017. [http://www.litencyc.com/php/sworks.php?rec=true&UID=2784, accessed 9 August 2017.] Elodie Paillard, Entry ‘Sophocles: Philoctetes’ in: The Literary Encyclopedia (Published version) Sophocles: Philoctetes Philoctetes is one of the very rare plays by Sophocles that can be dated precisely: it was first performed in Athens’ City Dionysia in 409 BC and won the first prize. The myth staged in this play would have been familiar to the audience and can be related to the saga of the Trojan War. Before embarking with the Greeks for Troy, Philoctetes is linked to the legend of Heracles. Because Philoctetes had agreed to light the funeral pyre on which he wished to be burnt alive, Heracles gave Philoctetes his own bow, a special, almost magical, weapon: its arrows never miss their target. As the Greeks were sailing to Troy, they stopped to offer a sacrifice on the island of Chrysē (or to a deity called Chrysē), and Philoctetes was bitten on the foot by a water-snake during this stopover. The injury is so painful that Philoctetes’ cries of agony never stop and prevent the peaceful performing of the religious rites. The wound also emits a terrible smell. Odysseus and the Atreids thus decide to abandon Philoctetes on Lemnos and he is supposed to never come back. However, several years later, near the end of the Trojan War, the Greeks hear from Helenos, a Trojan seer, a prophecy saying that Troy could never be captured without Philoctetes and his bow. -
Focusing on the 'Margins' of Sophocles' Ajax
Focusing on the “Margins” of Sophocles’ Ajax and Philoctetes Associate Professor Christy Stanlake United States Naval Academy Adjusting Our Lenses: When we read the classic plays of 5th Century B.C. Athens, we have to shift our contemporary notions of what a play is and how theatre functioned in Attica. We notice that the structure of these plays is different. There are choral odes in which a group of characters sing and dance in unison (kind of like today’s musical theatre numbers) and episodes in which the central characters speak or sing to one another, to the chorus, to the gods, and to the audience. The odes are broken into strophes, “turning,” and antistrophes, “turning back,” that rhythmically mirror one another. The parallel structure allowed for viewers to understand the agon, the “struggle” or “contest,” between opposing views through three physical senses: sight (as the chorus danced one direction and then literally turned the opposite direction); sound (the equally balanced measures of music that supported each view); and touch (the rhythm the dancers’ feet made as they stepped in rhythm with the odes’ poetry. [Incidentally, the way we describe lines of poetry as being comprised of “feet” comes from the Greek tradition of literally stomping out the odes’ rhythm upon the ground with one’s feet.] Aristotle’s Poetics (335 B.C.), the first work of theatrical criticism, sought to describe the substance and nature of theatre. His thesis that classical tragedy was intended to influence catharsis, a purging of emotions such as pity and fear, forever shaped how people view western drama. -
PAUL WOODRUFF 1965 AB in Classics
PAUL WOODRUFF CURRICULUM VITAE (January 2018) EDUCATION 1965 A.B. in Classics, Princeton University 1968 B.A. in Literae Humaniores, Oxford University (Merton College) 1973 Ph.D. in Philosophy, Princeton University Dissertation: "The Euthyphro and the Hippias Major: Two Studies in Socratic Dialectic," supervised by Gregory Vlastos EMPLOYMENT 1969-1971 U.S. Army, discharged with rank of Captain 1973- Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS 1976-78, 1979-81 Assistant Chairman, Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin 1987-88 Graduate Adviser, Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin 1988-1991 Chairman, Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin 1991-2006 Director, Plan II Honors Program, The University of Texas at Austin 2006-2012 Dean of Undergraduate Studies The University of Texas at Austin OTHER SERVICE 1985-87 President, Phi Beta Kappa, Chapter A of Texas 1990-92 Chair, Mellon Fellowship Program, Southwest Region 1990-94 Vice-President, Institute for the Humanities at Salado 1992-93 Chair, American Philosophical Association Program Committee, Central Division 1992-97 Chair, Rhodes-Marshall Review Committee, The University of Texas at Austin 1996-97 Chair, Faculty Council, The University of Texas at Austin 1997 Convened conference on Reason and Religion in Fifth-Century Greece in Austin 2010-12 Executive Board Member, The Reinvention Center. AWARDS, FELLOWSHIPS, GRANTS 1965-1968 Marshall Scholarship PAUL WOODRUFF, CURRICULUM VITAE PAGE 2 1978-1979 Junior Fellowship, The Center for Hellenic Studies 1983 Austin Book Award 1984-1985 Research Fellowship, National Endowment for the Humanities Summer, 1986 Grant to teach a seminar for college teachers, N.E.H. -
'Significant Actions in Sophocles' Philoctetes'
Significant Actions in Sophocles' "Philoctetes" Taplin, Oliver Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1971; 12, 1; ProQuest pg. 25 Significant Actions in Sophocles' Philoetetes Oliver Taplin HAT HAPPENS in a Greek tragedy? The tale is widespread W that nothing happens; that all the action takes place off stage, and that on stage people stand still and simply talk or sing. On the contrary, all the significant action takes place on stage: what goes on off stage only matters in so far as it is given a bearing on the play on stage. All the great brute deeds-voyages, battles, crunching of bones and sacking of cities-all these concern the play in as much as they are given attention on stage; while the small stage actions-arrival, departure, embracing, separating, handing over ob jects-slight deeds like these take on, in their context, greatly magni fied significance, and become the embodiments of tragedy. Greek tragedy may be static and uneventful compared with some other kinds of drama, but there is still plenty of action if you look for the right kind of thing. It is a commonplace these days that Greek tragedy was created to be performed; that the dramatist was his own producer, composer and choreographer, and the reader must therefore try to envisage the play in his mind's eye and to hear it with his inner ear. Yet while nearly all scholars pay lip service to these tenets, very few put them into practice. Translations, let alone commentaries, are very careless with even the minimal stage instructions. -
Aquila Theatre's Mission Is to Make Classical Works
Aquila Theatre’s mission is to make classical works accessible to the greatest number. A play becomes ‘classical’ because we recognize that after a time it transcends the original culture it was created for. It retains the power to provoke the central question of what it means to be human. As a company dedicated to the classics, we feel a responsibility to acknowledge and explore newfound classical works. Aquila was founded in London in 1991 by Peter Meineck. In 1997, Aquila became a US non-for-profit organization and is currently based in New York. Aquila’s programs include: PRODUCTIONS IN NEW YORK CITY: Aquila is a major part of New York's theatrical landscape, producing a regular season of plays. Aquila recently produced: The Trojan War: Our Warrior Chorus, based on the writings of Homer, Aeschylus, Euripides, Sophocles and reimagined through the experiences of modern day military veterans at Brooklyn Academy of Music; Romeo and Juliet, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Philoctetes at GK ArtsCenter in Brooklyn, a staged workshop production of A Female Philoctetes at BAM Fisher’s Hillman Studio as part of our YouStories program, Euripides’ Herakles at BAM, Shakespeare’s Macbeth at the GYM at Judson, Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Pirandello’s Six Characters in Search of an Author, Shakespeare’s As You Like It and Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People at the Skirball Center for the Performing Arts at New York University, and Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 and Homer’s The Iliad: Book One Off-Broadway at the Lucille Lortel Theatre. -
Sophocles' Philoctetes As Therapeutic Tool
Sophocles’ Philoctetes as Therapeutic Tool Sophocles’ Philoctetes and Ajax have undergone a revival of sorts in the last few years through the Philoctetes Project which brings these ancient dramas to modern soldiers. The Philoctetes and the Ajax both resonate with modern soldiers who have gone through similar experiences as the titular characters. Sophocles’ plays are thought to be especially relatable for soldiers both ancient and modern as they were originally performed for an audience which would have included many veterans who could benefit from the cathartic effect of these plays (Blair, 2008). I, however, would like to propose that the Philoctetes would be beneficial for another group: those who have suffered trauma because of disease or the isolation resulting from such disease. Though the dating of Sophocles’ plays is difficult, the Philoctetes is thought to be one of his later plays which would have been performed well after the Athenian plague which devastated Athens. Philoctetes’ suffering would have been relatable to Sophocles’ initial audience who experienced similar feelings of pain and isolation. Dealing with disease, however, is not just an ancient problem but a modern one as well. The 2014 West Africa Ebola Outbreak and its victims are grappling with the same issues that the Philoctetes explores. As in the Philoctetes, the effect of the disease goes beyond the physical: Ebola victims often experience isolation and stigma not just while sick but after recovery as well (Diallo, 2014). Sophocles explores the suffering caused by such isolation in his Philoctetes. As the Philoctetes has resonated with both ancient and modern soldiers who experienced the horrors of war, it may have served as a therapeutic tool for the Athenians who suffered psychological trauma because of the horrors of sickness. -
Study Guide for Midterm Examination Format of the Exam the Exam, on Wednesday, March 15, Will Be a 50-Minute, Closed-Book, in Class Exam
History 100, Spring 2006 Professor Ogilvie Study Guide for Midterm Examination Format of the exam The exam, on Wednesday, March 15, will be a 50-minute, closed-book, in class exam. Please do not bring your class notes or books. We will provide bluebooks and scratch paper. Do bring a couple of pens. In the exam, you will be asked to identify eight terms of your choice from a list of twelve, and to answer one essay question of your choice from a list of two. What makes a good short identification answer? A good answer to a short identification question will address the themes on which the course has focused. It should be brief yet specific. Here are examples of short identifications of “Odysseus”: 1. “A mythical ancient Greek hero.” While true, this is a poor answer. It shows some knowledge of who Odysseus was but it doesn’t indicate why he is important in the course. 2. “A Greek hero from the era of the Trojan War. He was famed for his cunning, but in Sophocles’s play Philoctetes, he was portrayed as having no morals. He represented expediency in political decisions.” This is a much better answer, since it shows both a knowledge of who Odysseus was and why he is important in the framework of this course. Terms for short identification Hellenic era Peloponnesian Wars ataraxia (imperturbability) Hellenistic era Great Dionysia Epicureanism worldview Philoctetes Stoicism ideology chorus orthodoxy Homeric question deus ex machina (god from heterodoxy stock epithet the machine) orthopraxis Parry, Milman Alexander the Great monotheism oikos Hellenization Torah blood price Library of Alexandria gospel Persian Wars philosophy Documentary Hypothesis What makes a good essay answer? When you answer an essay question in an examination, it’s important to be clear and direct. -
S. Sara Monoson [email protected] Northwestern University Evanston IL 60208 (Abbreviated, February 2018)
S. Sara Monoson [email protected] Northwestern University Evanston IL 60208 (abbreviated, February 2018) Current Position at Northwestern Professor of Political Science, Classics and Philosophy Chair of the Department of Political Scienc Director of the Graduate Classics Cluster Prior Positions Chair, Department of Classics, Northwestern University, 2004-07, 2008-11 Associate Professor of Political Science and Classics, Northwestern University, 2001-2012 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Northwestern University, 1993-2000 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 1991-93 Research Assistant, Presidency Research Center, Princeton University, 1990-91 Scholarly Specializations History of political thought, Greek political philosophy, democratic theory, politics in the ancient world, classical receptions methodology, reception of Greek political thought in American political discourse. Education Ph.D., Politics and Program Political Philosophy, Princeton University. 1993 M.Sc. Political Philosophy, London School of Economics & Political Science. Awarded with Distinction. 1982 B.A., Brandeis University. Awarded with Highest Honors in Social & Political Thought, Phi Beta Kappa. 1981 Ancient Greek, The Latin/Greek Institute, The Graduate Center, CUNY. 1979 Research Books • Plato's Democratic Entanglements: Athenian Politics and the Practice of Philosophy, Princeton University Press, 2000. Awarded “Best First Book Prize” by the Foundations Section of the American Political Science Association, 2001 • Socrates in the Vernacular (under contract, Harvard University Press) • Roadmap to Plato’s Republic, manuscript in preparation Journal articles, book chapters, white papers • "Socrates’ Military Service", in Our Ancient Wars, edited by Victor Caston and Silke- Maria Weineck, University of Michigan Press, 2016. • "Aesop Said So: Ancient Wisdom and Radical Politics in 1930s NY,” Classical Receptions Journal, 2016, Vol 8, Issue 1 (2016), pp.