Review Cultural Control of suzukii in Small Fruit—Current and Pending Tactics in the U.S.

Torsten Schöneberg 1, Margaret T. Lewis 1, Hannah J. Burrack 2, Matthew Grieshop 3, Rufus Isaacs 3, Dalila Rendon 4, Mary Rogers 5, Nikki Rothwell 6, Ashfaq A. Sial 7, Vaughn M. Walton 4 and Kelly A. Hamby 1,*

1 Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; [email protected] (T.S.); [email protected] (M.T.L.) 2 Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (R.I.) 4 Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (D.R.); [email protected] (V.M.W.) 5 Department of Horticultural Science, University of , St. Paul, MN 55108, USA; [email protected] 6 Northwestern Michigan Horticultural Research Center, Michigan State University, Traverse City, MI 49684, USA; [email protected] 7 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]

Simple Summary: Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a science-based decision-making process that uses a variety of management approaches to increase farm profitability while protecting human   health and the environment, with pesticides used only as a last resort. An important alternative to pesticides, cultural controls modify production practices and/or the crop environment to reduce pest Citation: Schöneberg, T.; Lewis, M.T.; populations and damage. This review presents the current state of knowledge and implementation Burrack, H.J.; Grieshop, M.; Isaacs, R.; of cultural controls to manage the invasive vinegar fly, spotted-wing drosophila, in U.S. small fruit Rendon, D.; Rogers, M.; Rothwell, N.; Sial, A.A.; Walton, V.M.; et al. crops. Spotted-wing drosophila causes direct damage by laying its eggs into ripening fruit. Because it Cultural Control of Drosophila suzukii reproduces quickly, uses a variety of cultivated and wild fruits, and is highly mobile, spotted-wing in Small Fruit—Current and Pending drosophila is difficult to manage. Developing effective and economic cultural controls to manage Tactics in the U.S. Insects 2021, 12, 172. spotted-wing drosophila will help improve IPM programs. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects 12020172 Abstract: Spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: ), a vine- gar fly of Asian origin, has emerged as a devastating pest of small and stone fruits throughout Academic Editor: Denis J. Wright the United States. Tolerance for larvae is extremely low in fresh market fruit, and management is Received: 22 December 2020 primarily achieved through repeated applications of broad-spectrum . These applications Accepted: 8 February 2021 are neither economically nor environmentally sustainable, and can limit markets due to insecti- Published: 17 February 2021 cide residue restrictions, cause outbreaks of secondary pests, and select for resistance. Sustainable integrated pest management programs include cultural control tactics and various non- Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral chemical approaches for reducing pest populations that may be useful for managing D. suzukii. with regard to jurisdictional claims in This review describes the current state of knowledge and implementation for different cultural published maps and institutional affil- iations. controls including preventative tactics such as crop selection and exclusion as well as strategies to reduce habitat favorability (pruning; mulching; irrigation), alter resource availability (harvest fre- quency; sanitation), and lower suitability of fruit postharvest (cooling; irradiation). Because climate, horticultural practices, crop, and market underlie the efficacy, feasibility, and affordability of cultural control tactics, the potential of these tactics for D. suzukii management is discussed across different Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. production systems. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and Keywords: exclusion; pruning; mulching; irrigation; microclimate; sanitation; postharvest; IPM; conditions of the Creative Commons spotted-wing drosophila Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

Insects 2021, 12, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12020172 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/insects Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 18

Insects 2021, 12, 172 2 of 18

1. Introduction 1. IntroductionCultural controls that modify production practices and/or the crop environment can play anCultural important controls role thatin limiting modify productionpest populations practices and and/or damage the [1,2]. crop environmentThese approaches can reduceplay an the important availability role and in limiting suitability pest of populations crop habitats and for damage pests [by1,2 limiting]. These approachesspace and re- sourcesreduce for the feeding, availability mating, and and suitability egg laying, of crop as habitatswell as removing for pests byshelter limiting from space natural and en- emiesresources and adverse for feeding, weather mating, [3,4]. and Within egg laying, fruit production as well as removing systems, sheltercultural from control natural prac- ticesenemies are most and commonly adverse weather adopted [3, 4to]. improve Within fruitproduction production and systems,fruit quality cultural rather control than to managepractices pests are [5], most although commonly they adopted may provide to improve additional production benefits and by fruit affecting quality the rather crop environmentthan to manage and pests pest [pressure5], although [6– they8]. Cultural may provide controls additional can also benefits reduce by dependence affecting the on pesticides,crop environment which delays and pest pesticide pressure resistance, [6–8]. Cultural and they controls are critical can also for reduce implementing dependence sus- tainableon pesticides, integrated which pest delays management pesticide (IPM) resistance, programs. and they are critical for implementing sustainable integrated pest management (IPM) programs. Since its arrival to the continental United States in 2008, Drosophila suzukii (Matsu- Since its arrival to the continental United States in 2008, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) mura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) has disrupted Integrated Pest Management (IPM) pro- (Diptera: Drosophilidae) has disrupted Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs across gramsmajor across U.S. fruit-growing major U.S. fruit regions-growing [9]. Although regions [9].D. suzukiiAlthoughaccepts D. suzukii a broad accepts spectrum a broad of spectrumhosts and of ripeness, hosts and females ripeness, often females use their often sawlike use ovipositortheir sawlike to lay ovipositor eggs into to soft-skinned, lay eggs into softripening-skinned, and ripening ripe fruit and including ripe fruit blueberries, including caneberries, blueberries, strawberries, caneberries, and strawberries, cherries [10–14 and]. cherriesTheir short [10– reproductive14]. Their short cycle reproductive and quick development cycle and allowsquick development populations to allows grow rapidly popula- tionsand to makes grow management rapidly and extremelymakes management difficult [15 –extremely17]. Drosophila difficult suzukii [15–has17]. dramatically Drosophila su- zukiiimpacted has dramatically the economics impacted of small the fruit economics production of small due tofruit increased production management due to increased costs, managedirect fruitment damage, costs, direct and the fruit potential damage, for and contamination the potential of the for fruit contamination with secondary of the pests fruit withand secondary diseases [18 pests–23]. and In thediseases absence [18 of–23 alternative]. In the absence management of alternative tactics, growersmanagement rely on tac- tics,broad-spectrum growers rely insecticideson broad-spectrum [19,24,25 insecticides]. Implementing [19,24,25] and developing. Implementing cultural and controldevelop- ingtechniques cultural control that target techniques various D.that suzukii targetlife various stages D. could suzukii help life restore stages IPM could programs help restore for IPMsmall programs fruit production for small (Figure fruit production1). (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Life stages of D. suzukii targeted by cultural control practices. Figure Credit: Naiade Caparelli. Figure 1. Life stages of D. suzukii targeted by cultural control practices. Figure Credit: Naiade Caparelli.

Insects 2021, 12, 172 3 of 18

In the U.S., nearly 34,000 farms produce small fruit on more than 300,000 acres [26], with production systems varying geographically and encountering regional and crop- specific challenges for D. suzukii management [5,27]. For example, the majority of fresh market small fruit is hand harvested, while fruit bound for processing markets is commonly mechanically harvested [5,28–30]. Mechanical harvesting reduces labor costs, but requires a large volume of ripe fruit on the plant at the same time, which extends the growing period and provides additional time for pests to damage fruit [31]. Achieving consistent, thorough harvests can also be challenging on small scale or you-pick fruit farms, where unharvested or cull fruit can act as a reservoir for D. suzukii populations. Ultimately, successful cultural control programs will vary depending on the production system (retail, export, you-pick), marketing strategy (quick frozen, juice, fresh), farm size, and regional climate. While there is no one-size-fits-all approach to cultural management of D. suzukii, some cultural tactics show broad promise and others may be useful in specific settings (Table1). Certain cultural control methods can be used irrespective of farm size, crop, or climate. For example, crops and cultivars that fruit early in the growing season are less vulnerable to infestation because D. suzukii populations build over the season [32–34]. Pruning is a rou- tine procedure used to increase plant health and fruit quality [5] that may also contribute to D. suzukii management. Habitat suitability can be altered because D. suzukii is sensitive to extreme abiotic conditions [17,35–38]. However, the ability to sufficiently reduce habitat suitability is affected by the climate of the growing region; for example, tactics to reduce relative humidity can be more successful in arid regions. Cultural decisions made during the establishment of plantings can also influence pest pressure, and at-planting tactics such as mulching or trellising may be hard to modify once plants are established. Row orienta- tion can help to increase sunlight interception (north–south rows vs. east–west rows) and air flow [5], which can affect the microclimate experienced by D. suzukii. Frequent har- vesting and appropriate disposal of overripe or cull fruit reduces potential oviposition sites and keeps populations manageable during the season [39,40]. Although these sanita- tion measures may have potential for all production systems, they require a considerable amount of labor. Exclusion netting or plastic row covers also require careful considera- tion, as the initial investment can be high and amortization can take several years [41,42]. Ultimately, growers need research-based information to decide which cultural control methods are most economic, feasible, and least labor intensive for their production system. Tremendous efforts have recently been made to evaluate cultural control strategies for D. suzukii. This article reviews recent literature on potential strategies, broadly categorizing cultural tactics into preventative approaches that reduce D. suzukii pressure, tactics that alter the within-crop microclimate, and tactics that reduce resource availability. We also discuss approaches to mitigate losses through postharvest management, followed by a case-study synthesis section. We conclude with an outlook into future research directions and approaches to increase the adoption of cultural controls for this pest. Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 18 Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 18 Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 18

Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 18

In theIn U.S., the nearlyU.S., nearly 34,000 34,000 farms farms produce produce small smallfruit onfruit more on morethan 300,000than 300,000 acres acres[26], [26], In the U.S., nearly 34,000 farms produce small fruit on more than 300,000 acres [26], with productionwith production systems systems varying varying geographically geographically and encountering and encountering regional regional and crop and- spe-crop-spe- with production systems varying geographically and encountering regional and crop-spe- cific challengescific Inchallenges the for U.S., D. for nearlysuzukii D. suzukii 34,000 management managementfarms produce [5,27]. [5,27]. For small example, For fruit example, on the more majorit the than majority 300,000of freshy of acresfreshmar- [26],mar- cific challenges for D. suzukii management [5,27]. For example, the majority of fresh mar- ket smallwithket small fruitproduction isfruit hand is systems handharvested, harvested, varying while geographically while fruit boundfruit bound for and processing forencountering processing markets regional markets is commonly and is commonly crop -spe- ket small fruit is hand harvested, while fruit bound for processing markets is commonly mechanicallycificmechanically challenges harvested harvested for [5,28D. suzukii– [5,2830]. Mechanical–management30]. Mechanical harvesting [5,27]. harvesting For reduces example, reduces labor the laborcosts, majorit costs,buty requiresof but fresh requires mar- Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW mechanically harvested [5,28–30]. Mechanical harvesting reduces labor costs, but3 requires of 18 Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEERa largeREVIketaEW largevolume small volume fruit of ripe is ofhand fruitripe harvested, onfruit the on plant the while plantat thefruit at same boundthe sametime, for time,whicprocessing hwhic extendsh markets extends the growingis the commonly growing 3 of 18 a large volume of ripe fruit on the plant at the same time, which extends the growing periodmechanicallyperiod and provides and provides harvested additional additional [5,28 time–30 for].time Mechanical pests for peststo damage harvesting to damage fruit reduces [31].fruit Achieving [31]. labor Achieving costs, consistent, but consistent, requires period and provides additional time for pests to damage fruit [31]. Achieving consistent, thoroughathorough large harvests volume harvests can of also ripecan be alsofruit challenging beon challenging the plant on small at on the smallscale same orscale time, you or- pick whicyou -fruithpick extends farms,fruit farms,the where growing where unharvestedthoroughIn theor cull U.S., harvests fruit nearly can can act34,000 also as a farms bereservoir challenging produce for D. smallon suzukii small fruit populations scale on more or you than. Ultimately,-pick 300,000 fruit farms, acressuc- [26], where periodunharvested andIn the provides or U.S., cull nearly fruitadditional can 34,000 act time as farms a forreservoir produce pests tofor damagesmall D. suzukii fruit fruit onpopulations [31]. more Achieving than. Ultimately,300,000 consistent, acres suc- [26], cessfulwith culturalunharvested production control or systems programscull fruit varying can will act geographicallyvary as adepending reservoir andfor on D. encounteringthe suzukii production populations regional system. and Ultimately, (retail, crop -spe- suc- thoroughcessfulwith culturalproduction harvests control can systems also programs bevarying challenging will geographically vary on depending small and scale encounteringon or the you production-pick regional fruit systemfarms, and cropwhere(retail,-spe- export,cific youcessful challenges-pick), cultural marketing for controlD. suzukii strategy programs management (quick will frozen, vary [5,27]. dependingjuice, For fresh),example, on farm the the size,production majorit andy regional of system fresh mar- (retail, Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEWunharvestedexport, cific challengesyou- pick),or cull formarketing fruit D. cansuzukii act strategy asmanagement a reservoir (quick frozen,[5,27].for D. suzukiiForjuice, example, fresh), populations farmthe majorit size,. Ultimately, andy of regional fresh3 suc-of mar-18 Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEERclimate. REVIketEW export,While small therefruit you - isispick), handno one marketing harvested,-size-fits strategy-all while approach fruit (quick bound to frozen, cultural for juice,processing management fresh), markets farm of D.size, issuzukii commonly and ,regional 3 of 18 cessfulclimate.ket smallcultural While fruit therecontrol is hand is noprograms harvested,one-size will-fits while -varyall approach fruit depending bound to cultural foron theprocessing productionmanagement markets system of isD. commonly suzukii(retail,, some mechanicallyculturalclimate. tactics While harvested show there broad is [5,28 no one–promise30].-size Mechanical- fitsand-all others approach harvesting may tobe reducesculturaluseful in labormanagement specific costs, settings but of requires D. suzukii , export,somemechanically cultural you-pick), tactics harvested marketing show [5,28 broad strategy–30 promise]. Mechanical (quick and frozen, others harvesting juice, may fresh), reducesbe useful farm labor insize, specific costs, and butregional settings requires (Tablea 1).largesome volume cultural of tactics ripe fruitshow on broad the plant promise at the and same others time, may whic be huseful extends in specificthe growing settings climate.(Tablea largeIn 1). theWhile volume U.S., there nearly of is ripe no 34,000 one fruit- sizefarms on- fitsthe produce- allplant approach atsmall the tofruitsame cultural on time, more management whic thanh extends300,000 of D.acresthe suzukii growing [26],, Certainperiod(Table andculturalIn 1). the provides U.S., control nearly additional methods 34,000 time farmscan forbe produce usedpests irrespectiveto smalldamage fruit fruit of on farm [31].more size, Achieving than crop, 300,000 or consistent, cli- acres [26], somewithperiod Certain productioncultural and cultural tacticsprovides systems showcontrol additional varying broad methods geographicallypromise time can for beandpests used others andto irrespectivedamage encountering may befruit useful of [31]. regionalfarm inAchieving size,specific and crop, crop settingsconsistent, or-spe- cli- mate. thoroughForwith example, Certainproduction harvests cro culturalps cansystems and also controlcultivars varyingbe challenging methods that geographically fruit can earlyon be small usedin theand scale irrespective growing encountering or you season-pick of regionalfarm fruit are size, lessfarms, and vul-crop, cropwhere or-spe- cli- (Tablecificmate.thorough challenges For1). example, harvests for D.cro cansuzukiips andalso management cultivarsbe challenging that [5,27]. fruit on early smallFor example, in scale the growingor theyou majorit-pick season fruity of are farms,fresh less mar- vul-where nerableunharvested tocificmate. infestation challenges For example,or cullbecause for fruit D.cro D.suzukiicanps suzukii andact management ascultivars populationsa reservoir that [5,27]. forfruit build D. early Forsuzukii over example, in the thepopulations season growing the [32majorit .–season Ultimately,34].y Prun- of are fresh less suc- mar- vul- ketnerableunharvested smallCertain to fruit infestation cultural is or hand cull control because harvested,fruit can methods D. act suzukii while as acan reservoir fruitpopulations be boundused for irrespective for D.build suzukiiprocessing over populations ofthe farm marketsseason size, .[32 Ultimately,is crop, –commonly34]. or Prun- cli- suc- ing is cessfula routineketnerable small cultural procedure to fruit infestation control is hand used programs because harvested,to increase D. will suzukii while plant vary fruithealthpopulations depending bound and fruit foronbuild processingthequality over production the[5] marketsthatseason maysystem [32 is also –commonly 34].(retail, Prun- mate.mechanicallyingcessful is Fora routine example,cultural harvested procedure controlcrops [5,28 and usedprograms– cultivars30 to]. Mechanicalincrease will that vary plantfruit harvesting depending earlyhealth in and the reduces on fruitgrowing the quality laborproduction season costs, [5] that are butsystem mayless requires vul- also(retail, contriexport,butemechanicallying to is youD. a routinesuzukii-pick), harvested management.proceduremarketing [5,28 usedstrategy– Habitat30 to]. Mechanicalincrease (quick suitability frozen,plant harvesting canhealth juice, be altered andfresh), reduces fruit becausefarm quality labor size, costs,D. [5] and suzukii that but regional may requires also nerableacontri largeexport,bute tovolume infestation youto D.-pick), ofsuzukii ripe becausemarketing management.fruit on D. strategythesuzukii plant Habitat populations (quick at the suitability frozen, same build time,juice, can over be whicfresh), alteredtheh season extendsfarm because size, [32 the– 34]. andD. growing suzukii Prun-regional is sensitiveclimate.acontri large to Whilebuteextreme volume to there D. abiotic ofsuzukii is ripe no conditions onemanagement.fruit-size on- fitsthe [17,35- allplant Habitat approach–38]. at theHowever, suitability tosame cultural time,the can ability managementbewhic alteredh to extends sufficiently because of D.the suzukiiD. growing suzukii, ingperiodis sensitiveclimate. is a routineand Whileprovidesto extremeprocedure there additional abioticis noused one conditionsto time-size increase -forfits pests- all [17,35plant approach to –health damage38]. However, toand culturalfruit fruit [31]. thequality management Achievingability [5] tothat sufficientlyconsistent, of may D. suzukiialso , reducesome habitatperiodis sensitive cultural suitabilityand providestacticsto extreme is show affected additional abiotic broad by conditions promisetimethe climate for pestsand [17,35 of others tothe– damage38]. growing may However, befruit region;useful [31]. the Achievinginabilityfor specific example, to sufficientlyconsistent,settings contrithoroughreducesomebute habitat cultural harveststo D. suitability suzukii tactics can management.also show is beaffected broadchallenging promisebyHabitat the on climate suitability andsmall others ofscale the can mayor growing be you bealtered- pickuseful region; becausefruit in specificfarms,for D. example, suzukii where settings tactics(Table tothoroughreduce reduce 1). habitat relative harvests suitability humidity can also is can beaffected challengingbe more by successfulthe on climate small in of scalearid the regions.or growing you-pick Cultural region; fruit deci-farms,for example, where isunharvestedtactics sensitive(Table to reduce1). to or extreme cull relative fruit abiotic canhumidity act conditions as acan reservoir be [17,35 more for –successful38]. D. suzukiiHowever, in populations arid the regions. ability. Ultimately, toCultural sufficiently deci- suc- sions madeunharvestedtacticsCertain during to reducecultural the or establishment cull relative control fruit canhumidity methods ofact plantings as acan can reservoir be be can more used also for successfulirrespective influenceD. suzukii in pestpopulations ofarid farmpressure, regions. size,. Ultimately, and crop,Cultural at -or cli- deci- suc- reducecessfulsions made habitatculturalCertain during suitability culturalcontrol the establishment programscontrol is affected methods will byof vary plantingsthe can climatedepending be used can of also irrespectivethe on influence growingthe production of pestregion; farm pressure, systemsize, for example,crop, and(retail, or at - cli- plantingmate.cessfulsions tactics For made example,culturalsuch during as mulchingcontrol cro theps establishmentand programs or cultivars trellising will that of may vary plantings fruit be depending earlyhard can toin alsomthe onodify growinginfluence the once production season plantspest pressure, aresystem es-less andvul-(retail, at- tacticsexport,plantingmate. to you Fortacticsreduce- pick),example, suchrelative marketing as cro mulching humidityps and strategy cultivars orcan trellising (quickbe morethat frozen, mayfruit successful beearly juice, hard in infresh), theto arid m growingodify farmregions. once size, season Cultural plantsand are regional are lessdeci- es- vul- tablished.nerableexport,planting Row to orientationyouinfestation tactics-pick), such marketingbecausecan as helpmulching D. to strategy suzukii increase or trellising populations(quick sunlight frozen, may interception build be juice, hard over fresh), to the (northm odifyseason farm–south once size, [32 – plantsrowsand34]. Prun-regional are es- sionsclimate.tablished.nerable made While Rowto during infestation there orientation the is establishmentno because one can-size help D.-fits suzukii ofto- allplantingsincrease approach populations sunlight can to also cultural build interceptioninfluence over management the pest (northseason pressure, of– south[32 D.– andsuzukii34]. rows atPrun--, vs. easting–climate.tablished.west is a routinerows) While Row and procedure there orientationair flow is no used [5], one can which to-size increasehelp- fitscan to- all affect increaseplant approach the health sunlightmicroclimate to and cultural fruitinterception quality experiencedmanagement [5](north that by of– may south D.D. suzukiialso rows , plantingsomevs.ing east culturalis– westtacticsa routine rows) tactics such procedure and as show mulching air flowbroad used [5], or promiseto trellisingwhichincrease canand plantmay affectothers behealth thehard may microclimate and to be m fruitusefulodify quality oncein experienced specific [5]plants that settings are may by es- D. also suzukiicontri. Frequentsomevs. buteeast cultural– to westharvesting D. suzukiirows) tactics and management. show airappropriate flowbroad [5], promiseHabitat whichdisposal suitabilitycanand of affect othersoverripe thecan may microclimateorbe cull bealtered useful fruit because reduces in experienced specific D. po- suzukii settings by D. tablished.(Tablesuzukiicontri .1). Frequentbute Row to orientation D. harvesting suzukii management. can and help appropriate to increase Habitat disposal sunlight suitability of overripeinterception can be or altered cull (north fruit because– southreduces D. rows suzukiipo- tentialis oviposition sensitive(Tablesuzukii .1). Frequent to sites extreme and harvesting keeps abiotic populations conditionsand appropriate manageable [17,35 disposal–38]. However,during of overripe the the season abilityor cull [39,40]. tofruit sufficiently Alt- reduces po- vs.tential iseast Certainsensitive oviposition–west culturalrows) to extreme sites and control andair abiotic flow keeps methods [5], conditions populations which can becan [17,35 used manageableaffect– irrespective38]. the However,microclimate during of thefarmthe seasonexperiencedability size, crop,[39,40].to sufficiently orby Alt- cli-D. houghreduce thesetential sanitationhabitatCertain oviposition suitabilitycultural measures sites control isand mayaffected keeps methods have populationsby potential the can climate be forused manageable all of irrespective productionthe growing during systems,of region; thefarm season size, theyfor example, crop,[39,40].re- or Alt- cli- suzukiimate.houghreduce For. theseFrequent example,habitat sanitation harvesting suitability cro psmeasures and and is cultivars affected appropriate may have thatby thefruitpotential disposal climate early forof in of overripe theall the productiongrowing growing or cull season region; systems,fruit reducesare for lessthey example, vul-po- re- quire tacticsa considerablemate.hough to For reducethese example, amountsanitation relative cro of humidity pslabor.measures and Exclusicultivars can may beon have that morenetting fruitpotential successful or early plastic for in in theallrow arid productiongrowing covers regions. also season systems,Cultural require are lesstheydeci- vul- re- tentialnerablequiretactics a oviposition considerableto to infestation reduce sites relative amount because and keepshumidity of D. labor. suzukii populations Exclusican populations be moreon manageable netting successful build or plasticduringover in thearid rowthe season regions. seasoncovers [32 [39,40]. alsoCultural–34]. require Prun- Alt- deci- carefulsions consideration,nerablequire made a considerableto during infestation as the establishmentinitial amount because investment of D. labor. suzukii of plantings Exclusican populations be highon can netting and also build amortization influence or plasticover the pest row seasoncan pressure, covers take [32 sev- also– 34].and require Prun-at- houghingcarefulsions is a these consideration,routine made sanitation during procedure theas measures the establishment used initial to may increase investment have of plantingsplant potential can health be can forhigh and alsoall and fruitproduction influence amortization quality pest systems, [5] pressure, thatcan maytakethey andsev-also re- at- Insects 2021, 12, 172 eral yearsplantingingcareful [41,42]. is atactics consideration,routine Ultimately, such procedure as mulching growersas the used initial need orto trellisingincrease investment research plant may-based can healthbe be hardinformation high and to and mfruitodify amortization toquality decideonce [5]plants which thatcan4 ofaremaytake 18 es- sev-also quirecontrieralplanting years abute considerable [41,42].to tactics D. suzukii Ultimately,such amount management.as mulching of growers labor. or ExclusiHabitat needtrellising researchon suitability netting may- basedbe or can hard plastic informationbe to altered mrowodify covers because toonce decide also plants D. require suzukiiwhich are es- culturaltablished. contrieralcontrol yearsbute Rowmethods [41,42].to orientationD. suzukii are Ultimately, mos management. cant economic, help growers to increase Habitatfeasible, need research sunlightsuitability and least-based interception canlabor informationbe intensive altered (north because forto– south decidetheir D. rows suzukiiwhich carefuliscultural sensitivetablished. consideration, control to Row extreme methods orientation as abiotic the are initial mos canconditions tinvestmenthelp economic, to [17,35increase canfeasible,–38]. be sunlight highHowever, and and leastinterception amortization the labor ability intensive (north to can sufficiently –take southfor theirsev- rows productionvs.iscultural east sensitive system.–west control rows) to extreme methods and air abiotic flow are mos[5], conditions whicht economic, can [17,35 affect feasible,–38]. the However, microclimateand least the labor abilityexperienced intensive to sufficiently forby D.their eralreduceproductionvs. years east habitat [41,42].–west system. suitability rows) Ultimately, and is air affected growers flow [5], by need which the researchclimate can affect of-based the the growing informationmicroclimate region; to experienced decide for example, which by D. suzukiireduceproduction. Frequent habitat system. harvesting suitability andis affected appropriate by the disposal climate of of overripe the growing or cull region; fruit reduces for example, po- Table 1. Cultural control practicesculturaltacticssuzukii used to tocontrol .reduce manageFrequent methods relativeDrosophila harvesting humidityare suzukii mos andtin economic, canappropriate blueberries be more feasible, and disposalsuccessful caneberries and of inleastoverripe in arid the labor U.S.regions. or Tableintensivecull Culturalfruit Credit: reducesfor theirdeci- po- Table Table 1. Cultural 1. Cultural control control practices practicestential usedtactics oviposition to used to manage reduce to manage Drosophila sites relative Drosophilaand suzukiikeepshumidity suzukii populationsin blueberries can in be blueberries more manageable and successful caneberries and caneberries during in in arid the the inregions. U.S. season the Table U.S. [39,40].Cultural Table Alt- deci- Naiade Caparelli. productionsionstential made oviposition system.during the sites establishment and keeps populationsof plantings manageablecan also influence during pest the pressure, season [39,40]. and at Alt-- Credit:Credit: NaiadeTable Naiade Caparelli. 1. Cultural Caparelli. control hough practicessions these made used sanitation during to manage the measures establishmentDrosophila may suzukii have of plantingsin potential blueberries can for andalso all production caneberriesinfluence pest insystems, the pressure, U.S. they Table and re- at- Credit: Naiade Caparelli.Productionplanting hough tactics thesePreventative sanitationsuch as mulching measuresUnfavorable or maytrellising Crophave maypotential beHarvest hard for toall mproductionodify oncePost-Harvest systems, plants are they es- re- TableCrop 1. Cultural control practicesquireplanting a usedconsiderable tactics to manage such amount Drosophila as mulching of labor. suzukii or Exclusi intrellising blueberrieson netting may and be or hard caneberries plastic to mrowodify in covers the once U.S. also plants Table require are es- ProductionProduction System tablished.quire a considerableRowTactics orientationUnfavorable amountUnfavorable canMicroclimate Crophelpof labor. toCrop increase Exclusi N onsunlight Managementnetting interception or plastic row (northManagement covers–south also rowsrequire CropCredit: Crop Naiade Caparelli.Production Preventativcareful tablished.Preventativ consideration,e Tactics Rowe Tactics orientation as the initialUnfavorable can helpinvestment toCrop Harvestincrease canHarvest Management be sunlight high Management and interception amortizationPost -HarvestPost (north-Harvest Management can– takesouth Management sev- rows System vs.careful east–west consideration, rows) andMicroclimate airas theflow initial [5],▲ which investment can affect can bethe high microclimate and amortization experienced can take by D. sev- Crop System eralvs. years eastPreventativ –[41,42].west erows) Tactics Ultimately, and airMicroclimate growersflow [5], ▲ needwhich research can• affectHarvest-Harvestbased the Management microclimateinformation by Postto experienced decide-Harvest which Management by D. ProductionSystem suzukiieral . yearsFrequent [41,42]. harvesting Ultimately,Unfavorable andMicroclimate appropriategrowers Crop ▲need disposal researchhand of- overripebased information or cull fruit to reduces decide whichpo- BlueberryBlueberryCrop Fresh-MarketFresh-Market culturalsuzukiiPreventativ control. Frequente Tactics methods harvesting are mos andt economic,appropriate• Harvest •feasible, HarvestHarvest bydisposal hand by Management and hand of overripeleast labor orPost intensivecull-Harvest fruit reduces forManagement their po- tentialcultural oviposition control sitesmethods and keepsare mos populationst economic, manageable •feasible,More and during least• Cold the labor• storage season Coldintensive [39,40]. storage for Alt- their Blueberry SystemFresh-Market production tential oviposition system. sites andMicroclimate• keepsPruning populations▲ • Harvestmanageable by hand during the• Cold season storage [39,40]. Alt- Retail Retail • Early season• Pruning• Pruning • More •frequent More frequent harvestfrequent harvest & & • •Irradiation Cold storage houghproduction these sanitation system. measures• may have potential for all production systems,█ they re- Blueberry Fresh-MarketRetail• Early •seasonhough Early seasoncultivars these cultivars sanitation measures• PruningWeedmat may have• Harvest potential• More by frequent hand for all harvest production• Irradiation &• • Irradiation systems, █ they re- quire a considerable• Weedmatamount mulch of labor. Exclusiremoveon cull netting fruitharvest or plastic & row coversControlled also require BlueberryTable 1. Cultural Fresh-Market control practices• Early used• season to manage cultivars Drosophila• Weedmat suzukiimulchmulch in blueberriesremove culland fruit caneberries in• Cold the• Irradiation storage U.S. Table █ • Exclusion•quire netting a considerableExclusion amount• Weedmat of labor. mulch Exclusi onremove nettingremove cull or fruit cull plastic • Controlled row• coversatmosphere atmosphere also require Credit:Table Naiade 1. Cultural Caparelli.Retail control careful practicesExclusion consideration, used netting to manage as •the Pruning Drosophila initial• Drip investment suzukii in • blueberries Morecan befrequent high and harvestand caneberries amortization & Controlled in the can U.S. atmospheretake Table sev- Retail • Earlycareful• Exclusion season consideration, cultivarsnetting netting• Drip irrigation •as Drip the irrigation initial investment• Training• Training harvest can fruitbe harvest team high to team and to amortization •• Irradiation•Cull Controlled fruit █can atmospheretake sev- Credit: Naiade Caparelli.eral years [41,42]. Ultimately, growersirrigation need research-based information• Cull fruit managementto decide which • Weedmat• Drip irrigation mulch remove•• Training cullTraining fruit harvest team to • Cullmanagement fruit management Production • Exclusioneral years netting [41,42]. Ultimately,Unfavorable growers Cropsort need fruitsort research fruit -based information• Controlled• Cull to fruit decide atmosphere management which cultural control methods are most economic, feasible,harvest and least team labor intensive for their Crop Production culturalPreventativ controle Tactics methods • Drip are Unfavorableirrigation most economic, Crop • TrainingHarvest feasible,sort fruit harvest Management and team least to laborPost intensive-Harvest Management for their Crop ProcessedProcessedSystem productionPreventativ system.e Tactics• Pruning • Pruning Microclimate ▲ Harvestto sort Management fruit • CullPost fruit-Harvest management Management ProcessedSystem• Early •seasonproduction Early seasoncultivars cultivars system. • PruningMicroclimate • Mechanical▲ •sort Mechanical fruit harvesting harvesting • Cold storage• Cold storage Blueberry Fresh-Market • Early season cultivars• Weedmat • Weedmat mulch mulch • Harvest• Mechanical by hand harvesting • Cold storage • Exclusion netting • Sorting machine • Cull fruit management TableBlueberry 1. Cultural Processed Fresh control-Market practices • Exclusion used netting to manage Drosophila• Pruning• Weedmat• suzukiiPruning mulch in blueberries • Sorting• Harvest machineand by caneberries hand in• ColdCull the fruit U.S.storage management Table Table 1. CulturalRetail control • practices • Exclusion• usedEarly netting to manage season• Drip irrigation• PruningDripDrosophila irrigation suzukii in • blueberries• More•• Sorting frequentMechanical machineand harvest caneberries & • in• ColdCull the fruit U.S.storage management Table Credit: Naiade Caparelli. Early season cultivars • Weedmat Mechanical harvesting • ColdCold storage storage Credit: Naiade Caparelli.Retail • Early season cultivars • Weedmat• PruningDrip irrigation mulch • Moreharvesting frequent harvest & • Irradiation█ You-PickYou -Pick • Exclusion• Early seasonnetting cultivars• Pruning • PruningWeedmat mulch mulch • Sortingremove machine cull fruit • Educate••• Cull Educate consumers•Cull Irradiation fruit fruitconsumersmanagement about█ about ProductionProcessed• Early season cultivars• Exclusion Unfavorable Crop• Consumer • harvestedSorting You-Pick • EarlyExclusion season netting cultivars • Drip• PruningWeedmat• irrigationDrip mulch • Consumerremove harvestedcull fruit • Controlled•management Educate atmosphere consumers about Crop Production Preventativ• EarlyExclusion seasone netting Tactics cultivars• Weedmat • WeedmatDrip mulchUnfavorable irrigation mulch Crop • TrainingHarvest• Consumermachine harvestManagement harvested team tocold storagePostcold• Controlled- Harveststorage Management atmosphere Crop Preventativnettinge Tactics ▲ Harvest Management Post-Harvest Management YouSystem-Pick• Exclusion• Exclusion netting netting • Pruning•Microclimate WeedmatDrip irrigationirrigation mulch • Training harvest team to •• Educate Cullcold fruit consumersstorage management about System Microclimate▲ • Early• Exclusion season cultivars netting• Drip irrigation• Drip irrigation • Consumersort fruit harvested • Cull fruit management Blueberry Fresh-Market • • Drip irrigation • Harvestsort fruit by hand Weedmat mulch cold storage Blueberry ProcessedFresh-Market • Exclusion netting • Pruning• Pruning •Harvest by hand • Cold storage Retail • Early season• Pruning • More frequent harvest & • •Educate Cold storage Processed • Early season cultivars • Drip• Pruning• irrigationWeedmat • Mechanical harvesting • Cold storage Retail • Early• Early season season cultivars cultivars • Weedmat• Pruning mulch •• MechanicalMoreConsumer frequent harvesting harvest & • Irradiation•consumers Cold storage█ • Early season cultivars • Weedmatmulch mulch remove cull fruit • Irradiation█ You-Pick • Exclusion• nettingExclusion • Weedmat mulch • Sorting machineharvested • Cullabout fruit management cold • Exclusion• Exclusion netting netting • Drip• Weedmat• irrigationDrip mulch • Sortingremove machinecull fruit • Controlled• Cull fruit atmosphere management • Exclusion netting • Drip irrigation • Training harvest team to •storage Controlled atmosphere Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW netting • Drip irrigationirrigation 4 of 18 Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW • • Drip irrigation • Training harvest team to • Cull fruit management4 of 18 Insects Insects 2021 2021, 12, ,x 12 FOR, x FOR PEERYou PEER REVI-Pick REVIEW EW Pruning Educate• consumers4 of 4 18 aboutof 18 You-Pick • Early season cultivars • Pruning • Consumersort fruit harvested • EducateCull fruit consumers management about • Early season cultivars • Weedmat mulch • Consumersort fruit harvested cold storage Processed • Exclusion netting • Pruning• Weedmat mulch • Harvest by cold storage Processed • Early season cultivars • Pruning • Mechanical harvesting • Cold storage Caneberries Fresh-Market • Exclusion netting • Drip irrigation • Harvest by handhand Insects• Early 2021 season, 12, x FOR cultivars PEER •REVI Weedmat• DripEW irrigation mulch • Mechanical harvesting • • Cold storage 4 of 18 CaneberriesCaneberriesCaneberries FreshFreshFresh-Market-Market-Market • Exclusion netting • Weedmat• Pruning mulch & •• Harvest HarvestSorting•• Harvest bymachine Moreby hand handby hand • Cold storage• CullCold fruit storagemanagement Retail • Exclusion• Early netting season• Pruning • Drip & trellising irrigationtrellising • More frequent• Sorting harvestfrequent machine & ••• Cold Cold•Irradiation ColdCull storage storage fruitstorage management RetailRetailRetail • Early season cultivars •• Pruning Pruning• PruningDrip & irrigation& trellising trellising & trellising •• More More• More frequent frequent frequent harvest harvest harvest •& &Irradiation & █ cultivars • Weedmat harvest & • Controlled█ You-Pick •• Early Early• Early season season season cultivars cultivars cultivars• Weedmat • Pruning mulch remove cull fruit •• Irradiation IrradiationEducate• Irradiation consumers█ █ about CaneberriesInsects 2021, 12, x FOR PEERFresh-Market REVI• EW • Exclusion • • 4 of 18 Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEERYou REVI-PickExclusionEW • Early netting season cultivars • WeedmatWeedmat• WeedmatPruning mulchmulch mulch mulch •remove removeConsumerremove cull cullremove harvestedfruitcull fruit fruit cull Controlled•atmosphere Educate atmosphere consumers4 of about18 Retail •• ExclusionCaneberries netting •Fresh Drip -irrigationMarket • Training harvest team to •• Controlled• Harvest atmosphere by hand Exclusion• ExclusionEarly nettingseasonnetting netting cultivars • Weedmat• Drip mulch • Consumerfruit harvested • Controlledcold•Cull Controlled storage fruit atmosphere atmosphere • •• Drip Drip irrigation irrigation •• Training Training harvest harvest team team to• to Cull fruit management Cold storage • Exclusion netting Retail • DripWeedmat irrigationirrigation mulch •• TrainingTraining• harvest Pruning team & trellising to cold• storage More frequent harvest & • sort fruit •• Cull Cullmanagement fruit fruit management management InsectsInsects 2021 2021, 12, x12 FOR, x FOR PEER PEER REVI REVIEWEW Exclusion netting • Drip irrigation• Early season cultivars • Cull fruit management4 of4 18of 18 • Irradiation█ • Drip irrigation sortsort fruitsort fruit fruitharvest team • • Weedmat mulch remove cull fruit CaneberriesProcessed Fresh -Market Pruning & trellising • Harvestto sortby hand fruit Caneberries Fresh-Market • Exclusion netting Harvest by hand • Controlled atmosphere ProcessedProcessedProcessed• Early season cultivars •• Pruning Pruning• Pruning & & trellising trellising & trellising• Mechanical harvesting •Cold storage• Cold storage • • Drip irrigation •Cold• storage Training harvest team to Retail •• Early Early• Early season season season cultivars cultivars cultivars Weedmat • Pruningmulch & trellising •• Mechanical Mechanical•• More Mechanical frequent harvesting harvesting harvesting harvest & • • Cold Cold• Cold storage storage storage Retail• Pruning & trellising• More frequent harvest• & • Cull fruit management Exclusion• Earlynetting season cultivars •• WeedmatWeedmat• Weedmat mulch mulch mulch Sorting machine Cull fruit• managementIrradiation█ Caneberries Fresh-Market Early season cultivars• • Pruning & • Harvest by hand Irradiationsort fruit Caneberries Fresh-Market•• ExclusionExclusion• Exclusion netting netting netting Drip irrigation• Weedmat mulch •• SortingSorting•remove SortingHarvest machine machine cullmachine by hand fruit •• CullCull• Cullfruit fruit fruitmanagement management management • Early season• Weedmat mulch •remove cull fruit • Cold• storage • Exclusion netting • DripDrip• Drip irrigation irrigation irrigationtrellising Mechanical • ControlledCold storage atmosphere You-PickRetail Retail Processed• Pruning•• Drip Pruning irrigation& trellising & trellising • Consumer • More•• Training More harvested frequent frequent• harvest Pruning harvest harvest team & & trellising to &• Cold storage • Early season cultivars • Drip• irrigationWeedmat• • Trainingharvesting harvest team to • Irradiation• █ • You-Pick • Early season cultivars• Pruning & trellisingEarly season •cultivars• Consumer harvested • •• Cull Irradiation fruit fruitMechanical management█ harvesting Cold storage You-YouProcessedPick- Pick • Exclusion • Weedmatmulch mulch Consumerremove•• Consumer cullSorting harvested• fruit harvested • Cull fruit management • Early season cultivars •• Pruning• Weedmat & trellising mulch• Canopy managementsortremove fruit cull Weedmat to fruit • Educatemulch consumers about • Exclusion netting Pruning• Pruning & •trellising & trellising sort fruit • Controlledmanagement• atmosphere • Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW •• Early• Exclusion season nettingcultivars netting• Weedmat mulch• DripExclusion netting•• Canopy machinemanagement to •• Educate• Controlled consumersSorting atmosphere4 machineof about18 Cull fruit management Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEWEarly • Early season season cultivars cultivars • Drip irrigation •Canopy Training• Canopy management harvest •management team to to to Educate• Educate consumers consumers 4about of about18 Processed• Exclusion netting •• Weedmat•• Pruning Drip irrigation mulch & trellising improve •efficiency Training ofharvestDrip irrigation teamcold to storage Processed Weedmat•• Pruning Weedmat mulchirrigation & mulchtrellising • Cull fruit management •• Exclusion• Early season netting cultivars• Drip irrigation improve• Mechanical efficiency harvesting of cold•• Cold Cull storage fruitstorage management Exclusion•• Early Exclusion seasonnetting netting cultivars improvesort• Mechanicalimprove fruit efficiency efficiency harvesting of of cold• Cold coldstorage• storage You•• -DripPick Drip• Weedmat irrigation irrigation mulch harvest sort fruit Consumer harvested •• Weedmat Drip irrigation mulch • Pruning & trellising • Exclusion netting harvestharvest• Sortingharvest machine • Cull fruit management Processed Exclusion netting • Pruning• &• Earlytrellising season cultivars•Sorting Consumer machine Cull •fruit Canopy management management to • Educate consumers about Amortization,Caneberries likelihood ofFresh in-Processed-seasonMarket weather damage, impact on agritourism,• DripPruning• irrigationPruning and & trellising supplemental & • Harvest pollination by hand should be considered Amortization,Caneberries likelihood Fresh of- inMarket-season • Early weather• Early season season damage, cultivars cultivars impact on agritourism, and supplemental• Mechanical• MechanicalHarvestharvested pollination•byharvesting Weedmat handharvesting mulchshould • Cold be• Cold considered storage storage Amortization, Amortization, likelihood likelihood of in of-season in-season weather weather• damage,Early damage, seasonimpact impact• on agritourism, on agritourism, and andsupplemental supplemental pollination pollination should should•• Cold be• considered bestorage considered Can contribute to plastic wasteYou and-Pick be difficult to recycle and break downWeedmat• Weedmat trellising• mulch Exclusion mulch netting • Consumer harvested EducateCold improvestorage efficiency of cold storage RetailYou- Pick • • Pruning• & trellising • More••• Consumer frequentCanopy harvested harvest & • Can contribute to plastic wasteRetail and beExclusion •difficult Exclusion netting tocultivars netting recycle and break• PruningPruning• downWeedmat & & trellisingtrellising Sorting• SortingMore machine frequent machine• Drip irrigationharvest & Cull•consumers Cull fruit fruit management management Can Cancontribute contribute to pla tostic pla wastestic waste and andbe• Early difficult• be seasondifficult to cultivarsrecycle to recycle and andbreak• • break Pruning down down & trellising • Irradiation• █ █ ▲ Most effective in regions that areYou-Pick arid during• EarlyEarlythe growing seasonseason cultivars cultivarsseason Drip• Drip irrigation irrigation • Canopymanagement management to • EducateIrradiationharvest consumers about • Early• seasonExclusion cultivars • Weedmat• mulch mulch remove• Canopy cull management fruit to • Educateabout cold consumers about ▲ Most effective in regions that are arid during the growing season• WeedmatWeedmat mulchmulch removeto improvecull fruit ▲ Most▲ Most effective effective in regions in regions that thatare arid are• Exclusion aridduring• during the netting growingthe growing season season• Weedmat• mulch • Controlled• atmosphere █ Export quarantine tactic YouYou-Pick-Pick Amortization,• ExclusionExclusion netting nettingnetting likelihood of in-seasonDrip weather damage,• Consumer•improve Consumer impact harvested efficiency on harvested agritourism, of andcoldstorageControlled supplemental storage atmosphere pollination should be considered • Exclusion netting • Drip• irrigation • Training•improve efficiency harvest efficiency team of ofto cold storage █ Export quarantine tactic • Pruning•• Drip PruningDrip irrigationirrigation&irrigation trellising & trellising Training harvest team to █ Export█ Export quarantine quarantine tactic tactic • Drip irrigation • Cull• fruit management Not yet tested as a standalone technique • EarlyCan• Early contributeseason season cultivars cultivarsto pla stic waste and be difficult to• recycle Canopy•harvest Canopy and harvestmanagement managementbreak down to to • Educate• EducateCull fruitconsumers consumers management about about • Weedmat mulch sortharvestsort fruit fruit NotNot Notyet yet tested yettested tested as as a a asstandalone standalone a standalone technique technique technique • Weedmat mulch ▲• Exclusion Most• effective netting in regions that are arid during the growingimprove seasonefficiency of cold storage Amortization, likelihoodProcessed of in-seasonExclusion weather nettingdamage, impact • Pruning on agritourism, & trellising and supplementalimprove efficiency pollination of shouldcold be consideredstorage Amortization, likelihoodlikelihoodProcessed of of in-season in- season weather weather damage, damage, impact impact• Drip on• DripPruningon agritourism, irrigation agritourism, irrigation & trellising and and supplemental supplemental pollination pollination should should be considered. be considered Tremendous█• Early season efforts cultivars have recently been made •to Mechanical evaluate harvesting cultural control• Cold strategies storage Can contribute to plastic waste and Export •beEarly difficult seasonquarantine to cultivars recycle tactic and break down harvest•harvestMechanical harvesting •Cold storage CanCan contribute toto plastic plasticfor waste waste D. andsuzukii and beTremendousTremendous be difficult .Tremendousdifficult This to article recycleto recycleefforts efforts reviews andefforts and breakhave •have Weedmat break• have recentWeedmat down. recently recently down recentlymulchN literatureMost mulch been beeneffective been made onmade inmadepotential regionsto to evaluate evaluateto thatevaluate strategies, are cultural aridcultural cultural during broadly control control the control growing catego- strategies strategies strategies • Exclusion netting • Sorting machine • Cull fruit management Amortization,season.▲ Amortization,Most effectiveExport likelihood quarantine likelihoodin regions of tactic.in thatof- seasoninforfor are-season D. D.aridNot weather •suzukii Exclusionsuzukii weather duringyetyet testedtested .damage, .This theThisnetting damage, as asgrowing aarticle articleastandalone impact standalone impact reviewsseason reviews on technique.agritourism,on technique agritourism, recent recent literatureand literature and supplemental supplemental• Sortingon on potential potential machinepollination pollination strategies, strategies, should should be •broadly Cullbroadly consideredbe consideredfruit catego-management catego- ▲ Most effective in regionsrizing that areculturalfor arid D. during suzukiitactics the .into Thisgrowing preventative article •season Drip• reviewsDrip irrigation irrigation approaches recent literature that reduce on potential D. suzukii strategies, pressure, broadly tactics catego- rizing cultural tactics into preventative approaches that reduce D. suzukii pressure, tactics Can█ CanExport contribute contribute quarantine to pla to sticpla tacticstic wastethat waste alterrizingand and rizingbe the difficultculturalbe withindifficult cultural to tactics -recycle cropto tacticsrecycle microclimate,into and andinto breakpreventative break preventative down down and approaches tactics approaches that thatreduce that reduce resourcereduce D. suzukii D. availability. suzukii pre ssure,pressure, We tactics tactics █ Export quarantineYou tacticYou-Pick -Pick • Consumer• Consumer harvested harvested thatthatthat alter alter alter the the thewithin within within-crop-crop-crop •microclimate, Pruningmicroclimate, microclimate, & trellisingTremendous and and and tactics tactics tactics efforts that that that reduce reducehave reduce recently resource resource resource been availability. availability. availability.made to We evaluateWe We cultural control strategies ▲ Most▲ NotMost effective yet effective tested in regions asin regionsa standalone thatalso that are discuss are aridtechnique arid during approaches during the thegrowing growing to mitigate season season• Pruning losses & through trellising postharvest management, followed by Not yet tested as a standalonealsoalso technique• Earlydiscuss discuss• Early season season approaches approaches cultivars cultivars to to mitigate mitigatefor D.losses losses suzukii through through. This• Canopy• Canopy postarticle post managementharvestharvest management reviews management, management, to recent to • Educate literature• Educate followed followed consumers consumers on potential by byabout about strategies, broadly catego- a case-studyalso discusssynthesis approaches section.• WeedmatWe to mitigateconclude mulch losses with throughan outlook post intharvesto future management, research direc- followed by █ █Export Export quarantine quarantine tactic tactic a case-study synthesis section.• Weedmat rizingWe conclude mulch cultural withtactics an into outlook preventative into future approaches research that direc- reduce D. suzukii pressure, tactics tionsa and case•a Exclusion approachescase•- Exclusionstudy-study netting synthesis netting synthesisto increase section. section. the We adoption Weconclude conclude of cultural withimprove with improvean controls outlook anefficiency efficiencyoutlook for intof this o ofint future opest. futurecold researchcold storage researchstorage direc- direc- Tremendous efforts• Drip have irrigation recently been made to evaluate cultural control strategies Not Not yet yettested tested as a as standalone a standalone techniquetionstions techniquetions and andTremendous and approaches approaches approaches effortsto to increase increaseto increase•have Dripthat the irrigationtherecently altertheadoption adoption adoption the been within of of made cultural culturalof -culturalcrop to evaluate controls microclimate,controls controls forcultural for thisfor this and this pest. pest.control tacticspest. strategies that reduce resource availability. We for D. suzukii. This article reviews recent literatureharvestharvest on potential strategies, broadly catego- 2. Culturalfor D.Control suzukii Tactics. This article reviewsalso discuss recent literature approaches on topotential mitigate strategies, losses through broadly post catego-harvest management, followed by Amortization, likelihood of in-seasonrizing weather cultural damage, tactics impact into on preventativeagritourism, and approaches supplemental that pollination reduce D.should suzukii be considered pressure, tactics Amortization, likelihood of in2.2.- seasonCultural Culturalrizing2. TremendousCultural weatherTremendous cultural Control Control Control damage, tactics efforts Tactics Tactics efforts impactTactics into have havepreventative on recentlya agritourism, caserecently-study been approaches beenand synthesismade supplemental made to that evaluatetosection. evaluate reduce pollination Wecultural D.cultural conclude suzukiishould control controlbe pre with considered ssure,strategies anstrategies outlooktactics into future research direc- 2.1. Preventativethat alter Tactics the within to Reduce-crop Pressure microclimate, and tactics that reduce resource availability. We Can Can contribute contribute to pla to sticplastic waste waste 2.1.and2.1.for andthat 2.1.for bePreventative D.Preventative difficult be D.suzukiiPreventativealter difficult suzukii the to. This recycle Tacticsto .withinTactics This recycle articleTactics andarticle to- tocrop and Reduce break Reducereviewsto breakReducereviewsmicroclimate, downtions Pressure Pressuredown recent Pressure andrecent literature approaches andliterature tactics on toonpotential that increase potential reduce strategies, the strategies, resource adoption broadly availability. broadly of cultural catego- catego- We controls for this pest. Minimizingrizingalso culturaldiscuss pest approachestactics damage into ispreventative to an mitigate overarching losses approaches goalthrough of that IPM post reduce andharvest includes D. management, suzukii strategies pressure, followed to tactics by ▲ Most▲ Most effective effective in regions in regions that that are arearidrizing aridMinimizing Minimizingduring during cultural the thegrowing pest growingpesttactics damage seasondamage into season preventative is is an an overarching overarching approaches goal goal thatof of IPM IPM reduce and and D.includes includes suzukii strategies prestrategiesssure, tacticsto to create asynchronya caseMinimizing-study between synthesis pest pest damagesection. occurrence2. CulturalisWe an concludeand overarching Controlfruit withripening Tactics goal an outlook asof wellIPM intasand oexcluding futureincludes research pests strategies direc- to createthatathat casealter asynchrony alter- studythe the within synthesis within between-crop-crop section.microclimate, pest microclimate, occurrence We conclude and and andtactics tacticswith fruit that anripening that outlookreduce reduce as resource int well resourceo future as availability.excluding availability.research pests Wedirec- We █ █Export Export quarantine quarantine tactic tactic from create fruittionscreate to asynchrony reduceand asynchrony approaches infestation. between between to Forincreasepest example,pest occurrence occurrencethe adoption planting and and fruit ofearlier fruitcultural ripening ripeningripening controls as well oras lesswellfor as thissusceptexcluding as excludingpest.ible pests pests fromalsotionsalso discuss fruit discuss and to approaches reduce approaches infestation. to mitigateincreaseto mitigate2.1. For Preventative thelossesexample, losses adoption through through planting Tactics of post cultural post toearlierharvest Reduceharvest controls ripening management, Pressure management, for or this less pest. followed suscept followed ible by by Not yet tested as a standalonecultivars techniquefromfrom reduces fruit fruit to reducethe to reducelikelihood infestation. infestation. of D. For suzukii Forexample, example, infestation planting planting as earlierpopulations earlier ripening ripening build or less upor less duringsuscept suscept ibleible Not yet tested as a standalonea techniquecasea case-study-study synthesis synthesis section. section. We We conclude conclude with with an anoutlook outlook int into futureo future research research direc- direc- the lattercultivarscultivars2.cultivars portionCultural reduces reduces reducesof Control the the the season. thelikelihood likelihood Tactics likelihood Barricades of of D. ofD.Minimizing suzukii thatD.suzukii suzukii exclude infestation infestation infestationpest pests damage as fromas populations aspopulations isfruitpopulations an canoverarching buildbe build effectivebuild up up goalduring upduring during of IPM and includes strategies to tions2.tions Cultural and and approaches approaches Control toTactics increaseto increase the the adoption adoption of culturalof cultural controls controls for for this this pest. pest. and reducethethe thelatter latter thelatter portion portionneed portion for of of curativethe theof theseason. season. season. strategies createBarricades Barricades Barricades asynchronylater that inthat thethat exclude exclude growingbetween exclude pests pests seaspestpests from fromon, occurrence from delayingfruit fruit fruit can can and caninsecti-be be effective fruitbeeffective effective ripening as well as excluding pests 2.1.Tremendous PreventativeTremendous effortsTactics efforts haveto Reducehave recently recently Pressure been been made made to evaluateto evaluate cultural cultural control control strategies strategies cide andapplicationsandand reduce reduce reduce the theor thereducingneed need need for for curativefor thecurative curativenumberfrom strategies strategies strategiesrequired.fruit to later laterreduce Successfullylater in in the theinfestation.in thegrowing growing growing implementing Forseas seas seasexample,on,on, on,delaying delaying these delaying planting tac- insecti- insecti- insecti- earlier ripening or less susceptible 2.for Cultural2.for D. Cultural D.suzukiiMinimizing suzukii Control. ThisControl. This article pestTactics article Tactics damage reviews reviews isrecent an recent overarching literature literature on goal onpotential potential of IPM strategies, andstrategies, includes broadly broadly strategies catego- catego- to tics requirescidecidecide applications applications carefulMinimizingapplications planning, or or reducing pestreducingor reducing regulardamage the thecultivars samplingthe number isnumber annumber overarching reduces required. ofrequired. fruit,required. the and Successfully Successfullygoal likelihood an Successfully initialof IPM financial ofimplementing implementingand D. implementing suzukiiincludes investment infestation these strategiesthese these tac- tac- tac-as to populations build up during 2.1.rizingcreaterizing Preventative cultural asynchronycultural tactics Tactics tactics betweeninto to into Reducepreventative preventative pest Pressure occurrence approaches approaches and thatfruit that reduceripening reduce D. asD.suzukii wellsuzukii preas excludingpressure,ssure, tactics tactics pests that mayticsticscreate tics2.1.requires requireslimit requiresPreventative asynchronytheir careful careful feasibility careful Tacticsplanning, planning, between planning, in to certain Reduce regular regularpestthe regular production latteroccurrencePressure sampling sampling samplingportion ofsystems.and of fruit,of fruit,of fruit the fruit, and and season.ripening and an an initial aninitial Barricades initialas financialwell financial financial as that excluding investment investment exclude investment pests pests from fruit can be effective thatfromthat alter alter fruit the the towithin reduce within-crop infestation.-crop microclimate, microclimate, For example, and and tactics tacticsplanting that that reduce earlier reduce resourceripening resource availability.or availability.less suscept We ibleWe thatthatfromthat may mayMinimizing may Minimizingfruit limit limit limit to their their reduce pesttheir feasibility feasibilitypest damageinfestation.feasibility damage in inandis certain certain inanis For reducecertain anoverarching example, productionoverarching production theproduction need planting goal systems. systems.forgoal ofsystems. curative earlierofIPM IPM and ripeningstrategies and includes includes or later lessstrategies strategies insuscept the growingtoible to season, delaying insecti- alsocultivarsalso discuss discuss reducesapproaches approaches the likelihoodto mitigateto mitigate oflosses D.losses suzukii through through infestation post postharvestharvest as populations management, management, build followed followed up during by by 2.1.1. createCropcultivarscreate and asynchrony asynchrony Cultivar reduces betweenSelection the between likelihood pest pestcide occurrence of occurrenceapplications D. suzukii and and infestationorfruit reducingfruit ripening ripening as the populations as number wellas well as required.excludingas build excluding up Successfully pestsduring pests implementing these tac- a casethea case -latterstudy-study portion synthesis synthesis of thesection. section. season. We We Barricadesconclude conclude with that with anexclude anoutlook outlook pests int frominto futureo futurefruit research can research be effectivedirec- direc- 2.1.1.from2.1.1.thefrom2.1.1. Crop fruit Croplatter fruitCrop toand and portion reduceto and Cultivar Cultivarreduce Cultivar ofinfestation. theinfestation. Selection Selection season.Selectiontics For BarricadesForrequires example, example, careful plantingthat planting excludeplanning, earlier earlier pests regular ripening ripeningfrom sampling fruitor lessor can less suscept of be susceptfruit, effectiveible andible an initial financial investment Drosophilationsandtions and reduce and approachessuzukii approaches the is need able to for to increaseto utilize increasecurative thea wide thestrategies adoption adoption variety laterof of culturalof cultivated incultural the controlsgrowing controls and wildfor seas for this fruit.on, this pest. delaying Withinpest. insecti- cultivarsandcultivarsDrosophilaDrosophila reduceDrosophila reduces reduces thesuzukii suzukii theneedsuzukii the likelihoodis is for able likelihood ableis curativeable to to thatutilize utilizetoof utilize ofD.maystrategies aD. suzukiia wide limitwide suzukiia wide variety infestationtheirlatervariety infestationvariety feasibilityin of ofthe cultivated cultivated of asgrowing cultivated aspopulations in populations certain and seasand and wild on,wildproduction build wild delaying buildfruit. fruit. up fruit. Within upWithinduring systems. insecti-Withinduring cultivatedcide small applications fruit crops, or reducingsusceptibility the number to D. suzukii required. infestation Successfully varies implementing and preference these tac- cultivatedcultivatedthecidecultivatedthe latter latterapplications portionsmall small portion small fruit fruit of fruitor theofcrops, crops, reducing the season.crops, season.susceptibility susceptibility susceptibility theBarricades Barricades number to to that required.D. D.to that suzukii excludeD.suzukii excludesuzukii Successfully infestation infestation pests infestation pests from from varies implementingvaries fruit varies fruit and canand canand bepreference preference beeffective preference these effective tac- may be2. Culturalaffectedtics2. Cultural requires byControl multipleControl careful Tactics planning, Tacticsfactors including regular sampling seasonality of fruit,and phenology, and an initial fruit financial availabil- investment maymayandticsand be reducebe requires affectedreduce affected the thecareful byneed by needmultiple multiple for planning, for curative curativef actorsfactors2.1.1. regular strategies including including strategiesCrop sampling and later seasonality laterseasonalityCultivar in of thein fruit, the growingSelection andgrowingand phenology,an phenology, seas initial season, financialon, delaying fruit fruitdelaying availabil- availabil- investment insecti- insecti- ity, fruit2.1. mayripeness Preventative be affected and Tacticsmaturity, by multiple to Reducechemical f actorsPressure factors including such as seasonality volatile organic and phenology, compounds, fruit fruit availabil- cidethat2.1. applications Preventativemay limit theiror Tactics reducing feasibility to Reduce the in number certainPressure required. production Successfully systems. implementing these tac- pH, solubleity,ity, ity,cidefruit fruit fruit sugarapplicationsripeness ripeness ripeness content and and andor maturity, maturity, or reducing maturity, acidity, chemical chemical the and chemical Drosophilanumber physical factors factors factors required. suzukii factorssuch such such as as is Successfully suchvolatile volatileasable volatile asto organic skinutilizeorganic organic implementing thickness, a compounds, compounds,wide compounds, variety fruit these fruit fruitof fruit cultivatedtac- and wild fruit. Within tics requiresMinimizing careful pest planning, damage regular is an overarching sampling of goalfruit, ofand IPM an initialand includes financial strategies investment to firmness,pH,pH,pH,tics solubleand soluble requires solubleMinimizing fruit sugar sugar texture. careful sugar content contentpest content Ripeplanning, damage or orfruit acidity, or acidity,cultivated regularis acidity,is more an and andoverarching sampling susceptible andsmall physical physical physical fruit of factors goalfruit, factorscrops,to factorsD. ofand suzukii suchsusceptibility suchIPM an such asinitialand asthan skin asskin includes financial skinunripe thickness, thickness,to thickness,D. fruitstrategiessuzukii investment fruit fruit infestation fruit to varies and preference thatcreate2.1.1. may asynchrony Crop limit and their Cultivar between feasibility Selection pest in occurrencecertain production and fruit systems. ripening as well as excluding pests [14,43,44]firmness,firmness,firmness,thatcreate. Fruit may and asynchronyand softens limitand f ruitfruit ftheir ruit andtexture. texture. between texture.feasibilitybecomes Ripe Ripe pestRipemay sweeter fruitinfruit occurrencecertainfruitbe is isaffected more as moreis productionitmore ripens,susceptible susceptibleand by susceptible multiple fruit and systems. ripening D.to to fsuzukiiD. actorstoD. suzukii D.suzukii as suzukiiincludingoviposition well than than as than excludingunripe unripeseasonality andunripe fruit fruit pests fruit and phenology, fruit availabil- from fruitDrosophila to reduce suzukii infestation. is able toFor utilize example, a wide planting variety earlier of cultivated ripening and or lesswild suscept fruit. Withinible larval[14,43,44][14,43,44] development[14,43,44]fromDrosophila fruit. .Fruit Fruit. toFruit are softens reducesoftens suzukii positivelysoftens andinfestation. and is and ablebecomes becomes correlated ity,becomes to utilizefruitFor sweeter sweeter example, ripeness withsweeter a wide as °Brixas it plantingandvarietyitas ripens, ripens, (solubleit maturity, ripens, of earlierand andcultivated sugars) and D. chemicalD. ripening suzukii D.suzukii andsuzukii and factors oviposition negatively ovipositionorwild ovipositionless fruit.such suscept asandWithin and volatile andible organic compounds, fruit cultivarscultivated reduces small the fruit likelihood crops, susceptibility of D. suzukii toinfestation D. suzukii as infestation populations varies build and up preference during larvallarval2.1.1.cultivatedlarval2.1.1.cultivars Cropdevelopment development Crop development and reduces small and Cultivar Cultivar fruitare arethe arepositively positivelycrops,likelihoodSelection positivelySelection susceptibilitypH, correlated correlatedof soluble correlatedD. suzukii sugar with towith D.infestationwith content°Brix suzukii°Brix °Brix (soluble (soluble infestation or (solubleas acidity, populations sugars) sugars) sugars) varies and and and physicalbuild andand negatively negatively preferencenegativelyup factors during such as skin thickness, fruit themay latter be portion affected of by the multiple season. f actorsBarricades including that exclude seasonality pests and from phenology, fruit can fruitbe effective availabil- maytheDrosophila latter beDrosophila affected portion suzukii suzukii by of multiple is the ableis season.able to firmness,f actorsutilizeto utilizeBarricades includinga wideand a wide f varietyruitthat seasonalityvariety texture.exclude of cultivatedof cultivatedRipepests and fruit phenology,from and andis fruitwild more wild can fruit.fruit susceptible fruit. be availabil-Within effective Within to D. suzukii than unripe fruit andity, reduce fruit ripeness the need and for maturity,curative strategies chemical factorslater in such the growingas volatile seas organicon, delaying compounds, insecti- fruit cultivatedity,cultivatedand fruit reduce smallripeness small the fruit need fruitand crops, formaturity, crops, curative susceptibility [14,43,44]susceptibility chemical strategies. Fruit to factors D.to later softens D.suzukii such suzukiiin the and asinfestation growingvolatileinfestation becomes organic variesseas sweeter varieson, andcompounds, delaying andas preference it preference ripens, insecti- fruit and D. suzukii oviposition and cidepH, applications soluble sugar or reducing content the or acidity,number andrequired. physical Successfully factors such implementing as skin thickness, these tac- fruit maypH,maycide be soluble applicationsbeaffected affected sugar by bymultiple or contentmultiple reducing f actors or larvalf actorsthe acidity, includingnumber development including and required. physicalseasonality seasonality are Successfully factorspositively and and suchphenology, phenology,correlated implementing as skin fruit thickness, withfruit availabil- these°Brixavailabil- fruit tac-(soluble sugars) and negatively ticsfirmness, requires andcareful fruit planning, texture. regularRipe fruit sampling is more of susceptible fruit, and an to initial D. suzukii financial than investment unripe fruit ity,firmness,ity,tics fruit fruitrequires ripeness ripeness and careful f andruit and maturity,texture. planning, maturity, Ripe chemical regular chemical fruit sampling factorsis morefactors such susceptible of such fruit, as volatileas and volatile to an organicD. initial organicsuzukii financialcompounds, thancompounds, unripe investment fruit fruitfruit that[14,43,44] may limit. Fruit their softens feasibility and inbecomes certain sweeterproduction as it systems. ripens, and D. suzukii oviposition and pH,[14,43,44]pH,that soluble may soluble . limit sugarFruit sugar their softens content content feasibility and or or acidity,becomes in acidity, certain and sweeter and production physical physical as it factorsripens, systems. factors suchand such D. as suzukii asskin skin thickness, oviposition thickness, fruit fruitand larval development are positively correlated with °Brix (soluble sugars) and negatively firmness,larvalfirmness, development and and fruit fruit texture. texture.are positively Ripe Ripe fruit fruit correlated is moreis more susceptible with susceptible °Brix to(soluble toD. D.suzukii suzukii sugars) than than and unripe unripe negatively fruit fruit 2.1.1.2.1.1. Crop Crop and and Cultivar Cultivar Selection Selection [14,43,44][14,43,44]. Fruit. Fruit softens softens and and becomes becomes sweeter sweeter as itas ripens, it ripens, and and D. D.suzukii suzukii oviposition oviposition and and

larvallarvalDrosophila developmentDrosophila development suzukii suzukii are isare positively ableis positivelyable to utilizeto utilizecorrelated correlated a wide a wide withvariety withvariety °Brix of°Brix cultivatedof(soluble cultivated(soluble sugars) and sugars) and wild andwild fruit.and negatively fruit. negatively Within Within cultivatedcultivated small small fruit fruit crops, crops, susceptibility susceptibility to D.to D.suzukii suzukii infestation infestation varies varies and and preference preference maymay be beaffected affected by bymultiple multiple factors factors including including seasonality seasonality and and phenology, phenology, fruit fruit availabil- availabil-

ity,ity, fruit fruit ripeness ripeness and and maturity, maturity, chemical chemical factors factors such such as volatileas volatile organic organic compounds, compounds, fruit fruit pH,pH, soluble soluble sugar sugar content content or or acidity, acidity, and and physical physical factors factors such such as asskin skin thickness, thickness, fruit fruit firmness,firmness, and and fruit fruit texture. texture. Ripe Ripe fruit fruit is moreis more susceptible susceptible to toD. D.suzukii suzukii than than unripe unripe fruit fruit [14,43,44][14,43,44]. Fruit. Fruit softens softens and and becomes becomes sweeter sweeter as itas ripens, it ripens, and and D. D.suzukii suzukii oviposition oviposition and and larvallarval development development are are positively positively correlated correlated with with °Brix °Brix (soluble (soluble sugars) sugars) and and negatively negatively

Insects 2021, 12, 172 5 of 18

2. Cultural Control Tactics 2.1. Preventative Tactics to Reduce Pressure Minimizing pest damage is an overarching goal of IPM and includes strategies to create asynchrony between pest occurrence and fruit ripening as well as excluding pests from fruit to reduce infestation. For example, planting earlier ripening or less susceptible cultivars reduces the likelihood of D. suzukii infestation as populations build up during the latter portion of the season. Barricades that exclude pests from fruit can be effective and reduce the need for curative strategies later in the growing season, delaying insecticide applications or reducing the number required. Successfully implementing these tactics requires careful planning, regular sampling of fruit, and an initial financial investment that may limit their feasibility in certain production systems.

2.1.1. Crop and Cultivar Selection Drosophila suzukii is able to utilize a wide variety of cultivated and wild fruit. Within cul- tivated small fruit crops, susceptibility to D. suzukii infestation varies and preference may be affected by multiple factors including seasonality and phenology, fruit availability, fruit ripeness and maturity, chemical factors such as volatile organic compounds, fruit pH, soluble sugar content or acidity, and physical factors such as skin thickness, fruit firmness, and fruit texture. Ripe fruit is more susceptible to D. suzukii than unripe fruit [14,43,44]. Fruit softens and becomes sweeter as it ripens, and D. suzukii oviposition and larval de- velopment are positively correlated with ◦Brix (soluble sugars) and negatively correlated with fruit firmness [14,45,46]. These characteristics vary across crop types and varieties, and are also influenced by environment and production practices [47,48]. To date, few studies have focused on plant resistance to D. suzukii. In choice and no- choice laboratory bioassays, female D. suzukii exhibited oviposition preferences for certain and late-season blueberry cultivars. No differences in preference were ob- served among raspberry and wine grape cultivars [14], but separate field surveys in North Carolina reported variable larval infestation rates among different raspberry, blueberry, and blackberry cultivars [45]. These differences in cultivar susceptibility were attributed to variation in fruit firmness and penetration force between cultivars, with fewer eggs laid in firmer fruit [45]. The role of fruit firmness was corroborated in laboratory comparisons of raspberry cultivars [46]. Additional interactions between the fruit’s chemical and physical properties may also influence susceptibility. For example, strawberry cultivars that produce high levels of methyl anthranilate experience lower infestation levels, although oviposition was similar across cultivars [49]; this trend may reflect limited D. suzukii egg viability and larval development in cultivars that produced high levels of this compound [50]. Across blueberry cultivars, more eggs were laid and more D. suzukii developed in fruit as pH increased [14]. Laboratory studies using artificial substrates also suggest that D. suzukii females may make oviposition choices that strike a balance between fruit firmness and sugar content [45]. Differences in oviposition and larval development between Italian grape cultivars were driven by fruit texture including skin firmness, elasticity, and pulp consistency. Drosophila suzukii was better able to take advantage of cultivars with softer skin and pulp with lower elasticity, while chemical factors including pH, soluble solids and acidity did not influence oviposition and larval development [51]. Understanding the physical and chemical attributes that influence fruit susceptibility may help growers select tolerant cultivars and could also guide future breeding efforts. Crops can be selected to phenologically escape peak pest populations. Drosophila suzukii populations fluctuate seasonally, with specific patterns varying across different climates and geographic areas [16,33,34,52]. In temperate regions, peak D. suzukii populations typically occur later in the growing season [32,53], so fruit that matures prior to these population peaks will be less impacted by D. suzukii in most years. For example, blueberry cultivars that ripened prior to 25 July in Rhode Island were not infested by D. suzukii, whereas later maturing varieties were more greatly impacted [54]. Primocane-bearing (fall-bearing, fruit on first year canes) raspberries produce ripe fruit later in the season and Insects 2021, 12, 172 6 of 18

usually experience high D. suzukii pressure [34,45,55]. Therefore, selecting early maturing crops and varieties can be an important preventative approach. However, because seasonal phenologies of the pest and crop are dependent on local weather conditions and vary from year to year, early maturing varieties may occasionally suffer damage, especially in years where D. suzukii populations are less affected by winter conditions [56].

2.1.2. Exclusion Fruit growers are increasingly using protected culture practices to preserve crop yield and quality, reduce damage from abiotic factors, expand the growing season, and protect crops from pests while meeting consumer demand for high quality fruit and reduced pesticide applications [57]. Physical exclusion using fine mesh netting (1.0 × 0.6 mm in size or smaller) can be installed on structures (e.g., high tunnels) and has effectively reduced D. suzukii infestation in raspberries [42,58,59], blueberries [41,60,61], blackberries [62] and wine grapes [63] compared to uncovered open field plots. The efficacy of physical exclusion depends on various factors, including D. suzukii pressure, host crop attractiveness, crop phenology, timing of installation, and grower management. High pest pressure primocane-bearing raspberry experiments show that exclusion netting can delay or reduce D. suzukii infestation and limit the need for pesticide applications [42,59]. However, later in the season D. suzukii populations may build under protected habitats, exceeding densities observed in open field locations [58] and necessitat- ing additional management practices. To be effective, exclusion netting should be installed before D. suzukii becomes active. may enter protected habitats via holes or gaps in the netting or when farm workers enter these structures; therefore, entryway vestibules may offer further protection and reduce colonization of protected habitats. Areas that frequently experience severe weather (e.g., high winds) that can damage the netting and structures may be less suitable for protected culture. Other potential drawbacks of using fine mesh netting and protected habitats to exclude D. suzukii include modification of the microclimate, effects on yield and fruit quality, increased incidence of disease, insufficient crop pollination, reduced abundance of natural enemies, potential negative effects on agritourism, and plastic waste. Marketable fruit yields tend to be higher when fruit is protected under fine mesh netting [58,59,62] and fruit quality is comparable to open field plots [42,60,61]. Fine mesh netting and protected culture potentially reduce ventilation and increase air temperatures; however, air temperatures in these systems were similar to open field plots [42,58–61]. The initial investment costs of physical exclusion can be high, and fruit grown under fine mesh netting may show higher incidence of botrytis fruit rot and crumbly berry, indicating insufficient pollination [58,59]; thus, in crops where fruit ripening and flowering co-occur, supplemental pollination may be required to ensure adequate yield and crop quality.

2.2. Manipulating within Crop Microclimate Drosophila suzukii’s narrow optimum temperature and humidity range (22–28 ◦C; ≥70% relative humidity [35,64]) may restrict the suitability of crop microhabitats. For ex- ample, exceeding optimal environmental conditions can cause habitat avoidance, reduced survival, oviposition and development, and damage reproductive organs [17,35–38]. To ex- ploit D. suzukii’s sensitivity to abiotic conditions, management techniques such as pruning, trellising, mulching, and irrigation can be used to create less hospitable environments for both adults and larvae. Combining multiple strategies is likely to have the greatest effect on D. suzukii populations. These measures alone will not provide complete control; however, they may cause sublethal effects and alter adult activity patterns, complementing other tactics within D. suzukii IPM programs.

2.2.1. Pruning and Trellising Pruning is a routine procedure used to modify crop architecture, which improves plant health and vigor as well as fruit quality, yield, and production efficiency [5]. Pruning may Insects 2021, 12, 172 7 of 18

also alter microclimate suitability for D. suzukii by opening the canopy, increasing airflow, and limiting shade and relative humidity [65]. Indeed, captures of adult D. suzukii in south-west Germany were up to two times higher inside dense, minimally pruned grape canopies compared to the standard pruning and trellising system [66], suggesting that pruning reduces adult activity and/or larval infestation. Pruning may be particularly effective in floricane-bearing (summer-bearing, fruit on second year canes) caneberries, where fruit-bearing floricanes and newly emerged vegetative primocanes grow together to produce a dense, shady canopy. High levels (25–50% canopy reduction) of pruning within caneberries reduced D. suzukii infestation up to 80% in California compared to denser canopies; however, low (8–33%) or no reduction was observed in more humid climates [55]. Likewise, lower fruit infestation was observed in highly pruned blackberry canopies in North Carolina compared with minimally pruned blackberry canopies [67]. In contrast, heavy pruning had no effect on D. suzukii infestation rates in grapes [66] and minimal effect in blueberries [55]. Changes in infestation likely reflect differences in crop microclimate, particularly lower relative humidity. Temperature minimally varied between pruning treatments, with slightly higher temperatures (0.0–1.7 ◦C) observed in highly pruned caneberries throughout the U.S. [55] and in less dense grape canopies (0.1–0.9 ◦C) in Germany [66]. In caneberry systems, trellising may be an additional tactic that could be integrated with pruning to further open the canopy and improve light penetration and air circula- tion. Various trellising options are available for raspberry and blackberry production, including the I-trellis, T-trellis, V-trellis, and rotating (swinging) cross arm trellis [5,28]. The I-trellis is a commonly used design that consists of either a single wire or two separated wires secured to large wooden posts [5,28]; though relatively inexpensive to install, the I- trellis forms a dense hedgerow canopy that may create optimal microclimates for D. suzukii. In contrast, the V-trellis is built with two metal posts that are set at opposite angles to form a V shape. This design allows for increased air circulation (lowers relative humidity) and light penetration (increases temperature) compared with the I-trellis [5,68] and may be more suitable for D. suzukii management. Rotating cross arm trellises that pivot so fruit is located only on the shaded side of the row require a higher financial investment and more intensive labor and maintenance, but facilitate harvest and minimize sun damage to the fruit. However, further research is needed to understand how these trellises affect the microclimate and suitability for D. suzukii. Pruning and trellising are constrained by crop seasonal phenology and typically need to be conducted early in the season when the plants are dormant. These tactics also increase production costs due to the additional labor and materials that their installation requires. However, the benefits that pruning and trellising provide may offset these limitations. More open canopies improve harvest efficiency and thus help with sanitation measures by reducing oviposition sites [69]. Additionally, open canopies receive better spray coverage [70,71]. In conclusion, pruning and trellising can be important components of an IPM strategy, rendering habitats less suitable for D. suzukii while maintaining yield and fruit quality.

2.2.2. Mulching and Ground Management Drosophila suzukii larvae typically leave the fruit to pupate in the top 0.5 cm layer of the soil [72]. This is facilitated by fruit falling from the canopy to the ground (60%–80% of infested fruit fall), and 82%–93% of the larvae pupate in the soil [73]. During the growing season, most of the D. suzukii population is comprised of immature stages inside fruit [16] that are mostly impervious to insecticides; therefore, cultural controls that target pupae and larvae will complement existing IPM programs. Different types of mulches can modify ground and canopy climate (temperature and relative humidity), potentially creating an environment less suitable for D. suzukii develop- ment. For example, black plastic mulches are increasingly used for weed control as well as to increase soil temperature and reduce humidity [74,75]. Depending on the type of mate- Insects 2021, 12, 172 8 of 18

rial used, mulches can also modify above-ground air temperatures, photosynthetic active radiation, and light intensity [76,77]. To understand how mulches affect D. suzukii, a recent study examined the influence of black woven weedmats on temperature, relative humidity, and immature survival in blueberries across different regions in the U.S. [78]. Two study regions (Maryland and Michigan) used field sites with young plants and small canopies; at these sites, the plots with weedmats had higher ground temperatures and lower levels of D. suzukii larval survivorship or natural infestation, a difference that could reflect factors such as increased solar radiation, increased light penetration, or reduced shade in the younger plantings, though further investigation is needed [78]. However, weedmats did not significantly affect relative humidity, ground temperature or D. suzukii larval and pupal survivorship in the other regions (Georgia, Minnesota, Oregon) studied. Weedmats can also provide an effective barrier preventing larvae from burying into the ground to reach more suitable pupation microhabitats; D. suzukii larvae and pupae have a significantly lower survival rate above the ground than below the ground [78]. Incorporating mulches or weedmats can also provide various horticultural benefits, while acting in conjunction with other D. suzukii management methods. In addition to mulching, soil tillage has been explored as a method to control D. suzukii; however, tilling the soil between organic blackberry rows did not significantly modify adult captures or fruit infestation [79]. Ground management tactics such as mulching and mowing are one of the most predominant preventative measures used against D. suzukii in Swiss grape crops [80], and their effectiveness in other crop systems and regions needs further study.

2.2.3. Irrigation Irrigation methods impact pest populations in multiple crops [81,82] and may be exploited for D. suzukii management. Changing the amount of water delivered or the type of irrigation system used can modify temperature and/or relative humidity within the crop. In Oregon blueberries, above and below ground temperatures were not altered by drip or overhead sprinkler irrigation, but relative humidity was lower in drip-irrigated plots [83]. This correlated with reduced D. suzukii pupal survivorship, though the survival of larvae inside infested blueberries was not affected [83]. This suggests that larvae are protected from desiccation while developing inside the fruit, but become more susceptible and succumb to desiccation after leaving the fruit to pupate. Irrigation may also affect adult activity and/or oviposition behavior. In choice bioassays, adult D. suzukii avoided low humidity conditions [36] and oviposition rates were highest in the center of blueberry bushes, a trend that positively correlates with relative humidity [84]. However, a recent study in blueberries found that fly activity (the number of flies visually counted flying in or on bushes) did not differ between irrigated and nonirrigated plots treated with zeta- cypermethrin. This pattern remained similar before, during, and after an irrigation period and regardless of pesticide application [85]. In addition to altering the crop microclimate, irrigation (or simulated rainfall) can remove insecticide residues, potentially affecting efficacy, with effects sometimes observed multiple days after exposure. In semi-field assays, flies exposed to blueberry fruit and shoots collected one day after zeta-cypermethrin treatment experienced lower mortality when the plots were irrigated for 60 min compared to flies that were exposed to fruit and shoots from nonirrigated plots; no difference in survival occurred in plots irrigated only for 15 min [85]. In blueberries, all levels of simulated rainfall (overhead irrigation) increased adult fly survival relative to the no-rainfall controls when flies were exposed to insecticide treated shoots one day after treatment, irrespective of the insecticide applied [86]. Comparably, in a semi-field study where cherry shoots treated with six different insecticides were exposed to a rainfall simulator with two different levels of rainfall, adult and offspring survival increased in both rainfall treatments relative to the no-rainfall control [87]. Considering the interactions among irrigation, environmental conditions, and pes- ticide efficacy, overhead irrigation provides a more suitable environment for D. suzukii Insects 2021, 12, 172 9 of 18

because it can reduce pesticide efficacy and increase relative humidity. Irrigation methods that do not spray water on the canopy (e.g., drip or flood) are expected to reduce D. suzukii pest pressure as well as conserve water compared to overhead applications.

2.3. Harvest Management Despite exhibiting a preference for healthy, undamaged fruit, D. suzukii will use alter- native hosts when intact fruit are less available [10]. This includes damaged or decaying fruit, fruit wastes, mushrooms, and even feces [10,14,88–90]. In addition, D. suzukii has a high dispersal capacity [91,92], allowing it to exploit diverse habitats where un- managed fruiting plants grow [93]. Accordingly, diversified agricultural landscapes allow D. suzukii populations to develop and build on early ripening crops (e.g., strawberries and tart cherries) and then readily move to mid- or late-season crops (e.g., blueberries, raspberries, grapes). Reducing alternate host resources within a farm therefore may help reduce or delay D. suzukii population growth. Harvest schedules and sanitation practices can affect the amount of host resources available to D. suzukii. Shortening the harvest frequency from every three days to every one or two days reduced D. suzukii infestation up to 60% in raspberries [40]; the feasibility of this practice depends on the type of operation and the crops produced. Waste fruits are common throughout the harvest process, including culls in the field, culls from processing lines, and leftover fruit in the canopy or on the planting floor. These can all provide resources for D. suzukii, so they should be minimized to limit population development. For hand-picked fruit, training harvest teams to reject and separately collect externally damaged or soft fruit can minimize postharvest larval infestation and help ensure that fruit meets fresh-market standards. Processed fruit is often harvested mechanically, with fruit removed regardless of quality. However, soft-sorting machines and other postharvest quality control processing steps can remove infested fruit from the final product. Early harvest can reduce infestation by D. suzukii in lowbush blueberry, but early harvest may also increase the number of unripe fruit harvested and thereby reduce yield, so the economic benefits and limitations of this strategy must be balanced [94].

2.4. Postharvest Sanitation The management of cull fruit wastes is important for sanitation to reduce populations of D. suzukii. Bagging and subsequent solarization can provide a near 100% reduction in fly emergence but is best suited to relatively small quantities of fruit [40]. Evaluations of burial suggest that shallow burial is not effective at farm scales [95] and that burial depths must be at least 24 cm to reduce emergence by 95% [39]. Composting fruit wastes with different feedstocks has also shown promise. Although laboratory experiments indicate that the combination of apple pomace (cider pressings) with high carbon vegetable feed- stocks (leaves and sawdust) only affected D. suzukii reproduction potential by dilution (e.g., the addition of 20% feedstock led to a 20% reduction in F1 generation), relatively small amounts of high nitrogen chicken manure reduced survival by 80–100% [96]. Similar results were observed in a subsequent field experiment for larger quantities of pomace containing D. suzukii and other Drosophila spp. [96]. Crushing fruit wastes and adding black soldier Hermetia illucens (L.) (Diptera: Stra- tiomyidae) to fruit waste are two additional postharvest sanitation approaches that have been preliminarily explored but have yet to be rigorously evaluated. Crushing of infested Montmorency tart cherries on the orchard floor using a golf cart eliminated reproduction of D. suzukii in crushed fruit within 72 h, while reproduction continued for at least nine days in uncrushed fruit (N. Rothwell, unpublished). Black soldier fly reduces or eliminates pest flies in animal manures [97,98], and preliminary laboratory trials suggest that the addition of early instar black soldier fly to small volumes of fruit waste can eliminate D. suzukii reproduction, either by influencing oviposition decisions or by direct competition with or predation by developing black soldier flies (M. Grieshop et al. unpublished). Insects 2021, 12, 172 10 of 18

2.5. Reducing Suitability of Postharvest Fruit Modifying the fruit storage environment postharvest is an effective and common strat- egy to manage many internally feeding insects. Depending on the crop, these modifications can include reducing storage temperature or short-term exposure to high temperatures, low oxygen atmospheres, or radiation. These latter techniques are used primarily for quarantine purposes to prevent the spread of invasive species; cold storage, atmospheric manipulation and irradiation have all been explored as potential nonchemical postharvest control tactics for D. suzukii.

2.5.1. Cooling Both cold and heat treatments have been developed for postharvest control, and as with other postharvest management strategies, temperature modification is most well studied with respect to quarantine pests [99]. As a group, Drosophilidae are believed to have originated in the Afro-tropics, and chill-susceptibility is considered their ancestral state [100]. Cold tolerance has been extensively studied within D. melanogaster and has been demonstrated to be variable among populations of this species and malleable to a certain extent based on conditioning [101]. Drosophila suzukii egg and larval mortality increases when exposed to cold temper- atures within artificial diet or fruit [102,103]. While D. suzukii also appear to increase their cold hardiness following gradual acclimatization either in the laboratory [104–106] or under natural fall and winter conditions [107,108], they cannot adapt when larvae in harvested fruit are placed directly from spring or summer growing conditions into low temperature storage. Temperatures lower than 5 ◦C slow or arrest immature D. suzukii development for up to three days, and storage temperatures of 1.1 ◦C and lower for three days or more result in significant mortality [102,103]. Eggs and first instar larvae appear consistently susceptible to cold storage while second and third instars are more variable in their tolerance [109]. Combined with frequent, thorough harvest to reduce immature development time in fruit prior to picking, cold storage can provide growers with a means to maintain marketability even if a field infestation is detected. Maintaining constant cold storage throughout the fruit supply chain, from grower to consumer, not only increases the shelf life of fruits but also reduces the likelihood of infestation resulting in damaged or unmarketable fruit.

2.5.2. Irradiation and Quarantine Management Treatment of fruit with high doses of radiation is most often used in quarantine programs for invasive pests to prevent their export. Effective doses vary by species, but guidance has been developed at the order and family level for some groups [110]. While irradiation is not considered a chemical treatment, its use in postharvest insect control is not universally accepted in all countries [110], and in the U.S., irradiated food products do not meet criteria for organic certification [111]. Because irradiation requires specialized equipment and is potentially risky to users, it is unlikely to be utilized for general D. suzukii postharvest control. However, irradiation may provide control of D. suzukii in export or quarantine situations. Developing irradiation protocols for postharvest fruit treatments is considered easier than developing temperature or modified atmosphere treatments, because radiation levels that kill insects typically do not damage fruit [110]. Guidance levels for D. suzukii quar- antine treatments have recently been developed. Different experiments have suggested slightly different doses and exposure methods for use against D. suzukii in fruit. In one series of experiments, adult emergence was completely prevented when first and second instar larvae were exposed to a dose of 40 Gray (Gy) [112]. Pupae, however, were more tolerant to radiation and required a dose of 80 Gy to prevent adult emergence [112]. In other experiments, adult emergence was not completely inhibited, even at higher doses, but all surviving adults were sterile following exposure to 100 Gy [113]. Radiation sources also differed in their efficiency against D. suzukii with electron beam radiation resulting in Insects 2021, 12, 172 11 of 18

higher pupariation compared with gamma irradiation, although both methods provide potentially acceptable quarantine level control [114]. Modified or controlled atmospheres which create low oxygen environments, and there- fore limit the respiration of insects within fruit [115], may also be used in postharvest pest control. They can be used alone or in combination with other postharvest treatments, but for D. suzukii, they have only been assessed in combination with irradiation [116].

3. Adoption of Cultural Controls in IPM Programs The invasion by D. suzukii has severely challenged cherry and berry IPM programs, and in some cases farms have adapted by growing other crops or by making other changes to their marketing and production strategies. The following specific perspectives represent situations where cultural controls were successfully adopted, and we acknowledge not all growers were in a similar position.

3.1. Blueberries—Pacific Northwest U.S. Increased global production continues to tighten markets and shape production prac- tices in Oregon and Washington (the Pacific Northwest, PNW). In the past, PNW growers were able to help fill the national and international supply gap during the late portion of the season, resulting in relatively high value crops from late August into September. The ever-increasing supply of blueberries worldwide has, however, caused these pro- duction regions to segregate themselves from other markets by focusing on crop quality. During the past 10 years, PNW blueberry production has begun to target high value fresh and export blueberry markets (D. Brazelton, personal communication), with an increasing portion of fresh blueberries produced in this region. During 2016 and 2018, 63% and 72% of all fresh blueberries in the U.S. were produced in the PNW, respectively. In British Columbia, Canada as well as Oregon and Washington, U.S., the majority of blueberries are organically produced. This market is driven by a price premium of up to two times higher than conventionally produced fruit. Producers seek this premium largely because of increasing capital and land costs, the cost of labor, and large volumes of crop produced by long-standing plantings of economically marginal cultivars. The PNW benefits from relatively high yields, making premium (organic) fruit pro- duction viable. Overall, western production regions receive relatively little precipitation during the growing and crop ripening period [117]. These relatively arid, hot conditions are less suitable for D. suzukii survival and reproduction [83,118]. In addition, cold winters combined with few suitable microhabitats result in reduced overwintering survival and relatively narrow D. suzukii population bottlenecks in Eastern Washington compared to other U.S. production regions. Because this production system is high value, growers can use a relatively large amount of resources on cultural practices. Growers have adopted weed fabric and drip irrigation systems within their production system to decrease la- bor demands, increase crop productivity, reduce weed management costs and manage D. suzukii pest populations. Weed fabric is used in conjunction with drip irrigation placed directly underneath the fabric to decrease water use and weed management costs. The use of weed fabric and drip irrigation can also reduce D. suzukii pest pressure by reducing access to pupation sites and habitat favorability. Pruning choices are driven by growers wanting to produce a crop of premium value (D. Brazelton, personal communication) [119], though they may also reduce D. suzukii pressure [55]. Therefore, pruning can provide multiple benefits. Currently few growers make use of protective coverings as pesticide application efficacy is not hampered by the minimal summer precipitation, unlike other pro- duction regions [59]. However, some growers have diversified their production practices to stretch the production season into October, to supply fresh, local fruit to local metropolitan regions (D. Brazelton, personal communication [117]). Some of these practices include the use of tunnel systems, and late cultivars. PNW growers continue to fund investigations into new tools to decrease input costs; including cultural practices as well as behavioral tools such as deterrents and behavioral modifiers [120,121]. Insects 2021, 12, 172 12 of 18

3.2. Caneberries—Eastern U.S. Cultural control methods have great potential to reduce the need for chemical control of D. suzukii in caneberries. Of the available options, pruning, netting, harvest management, and cold storage are the most widely used and adaptable. Some farms in the eastern U.S. including The Berry Patch farm in New York [122] and Nourse Farms in Massachusetts have combined technical expertise in growing berry plants with a commitment to optimize nonchemical approaches before using insecticides. Netting has minimized pest pressure in demonstration plots at The Berry Patch, and the owners of this farm have had great success with using this at their you-pick plant- ings of raspberries and blueberries. This has been installed on lightweight PVC support hoops, and it can also be retrofitted to high tunnels. High tunnels are increasingly popular for berry production, and although growers might be concerned with the initial investment, Nate Nourse who worked with them at Nourse Farms from 2011–2017 reports a return on the investment within 3–4 years (N. Nourse, personal communication). Tunnels also lower disease rates, reduce predation, and provide shade that improves fruit quality. These benefits may also be improved by the installation of exclusion netting for reducing D. suzukii immigration. However, with concerns about high temperatures affecting plant growth in regions where summer heat may be an issue, growers can install fans for heat removal or roll up the sides of the tunnels. These actions can also be automated. One newer aspect of raspberry production that has allowed for increased yields is double cropping. This works well with the newer cultivars; with appropriate pruning of field grown plants, a portion of the crop can be adapted to ripen in summer before D. suzukii populations increase. Potted plants can be held at controlled temperatures and later moved to fields or high tunnels to allow for flexibility of growth and fruiting to push cultivar ripening into times of the season when D. suzukii pressure is lower. With these adjustments in the ripening period and production approach, growers may be able to harvest with fewer people, keep pickers busy from July to November, and harvest more berries per acre (N. Nourse, personal communication). This dovetails with needing to pick every day to maintain fruit quality and break the D. suzukii life cycle. After harvest, berries are placed in a cold chain at 0.6 ◦C (33 ◦F) where they can maintain quality for 3–5 days. Some farms may have a mix of protected and open field production, and at Nourse Farms they divide staff between these, allowing for picking berries in dry conditions, either in outside fields when it is not raining or in protected (high tunnel) fields when raining. By implementing these approaches, Mr. Nourse reports being able to grade 99.9% of the harvest as perfect berries in half pint clamshells. This required increased staffing to ensure that nothing went wrong in the production cycle, and to manage the complexities of the new system. Overall, the experiences of The Berry Patch and Nourse Farms adjusting to D. suzukii invasion highlights that combining new cultivars, modern crop management, netting or high tunnels, adjusted harvest schedules, and postharvest cooling can greatly increase yields and fruit quality under commercial production conditions despite the challenges created by D. suzukii. This shows the effectiveness of cultural controls when they are combined in an integrated system, allowing for significant reduction in the need for insecticides and allowing biological control for other pests to flourish. Cost-share programs that allow growers to purchase high tunnels, or to start small by netting a portion of a farm, can help farms gain experience with this approach and see the benefits for themselves.

4. Future Directions Developing effective and economic cultural control methods to manage D. suzukii will fill an important gap in existing IPM programs. In recent years, there has been a strong push to advance various cultural options for fruit production. However, tactics vary in their feasibility depending on farm size and marketing strategy. For example, exclusion netting systems require high initial investment in labor and materials. Given the costs associated with purchasing, installing, and properly disposing of materials, these tactics may be more suitable on farms with smaller scale fruit production or in operations that empha- Insects 2021, 12, 172 13 of 18

size producing high value fruit. Likewise, additional pruning costs could be justified with concomitant increases to fruit quality, which may be less compatible with mechan- ical harvest and processing markets. Shortened harvest intervals and the removal of unmarketable or leftover fruit is usually not practical for you-pick farms that rely on consumers to harvest the majority of fruit and may not have the budget to train harvest crews or perform additional harvests. In some instances, the benefits of cultural con- trol tactics extend beyond D. suzukii control, facilitating their adoption. For example, using mulches to target this pest may not always be economical, but the weed management benefits can offset limitations. Irrigation management can be a useful option in the arid areas of the U.S. west coast, with the additional benefit of potentially reducing water use. However, operations must invest in new drip irrigation materials if they currently rely on other irrigation systems. In addition to the initial input costs, the disposal of cultural control materials can also be challenging. For example, netting and plastic weedmat mulches become plastic waste [123]. Incentive programs and regulations on plastic waste disposal vary across the U.S. [124,125] and depending on the production region and the type of plastic used, recycling may be difficult [126] and these materials often biodegrade slowly [127]. Work addressing the financial and logistical barriers to the implementation of cultural control strategies, with systems-based cost benefit analyses, is necessary to develop and integrate economically viable cultural tactics into future IPM programs for this pest. Several key knowledge gaps should be addressed to facilitate further integration of D. suzukii cultural controls into commercial production. In depth economic analysis of the individual tactics is needed across a variety of production systems; this will help ensure that the additional costs provide tangible benefits in terms of D. suzukii control, production goals, and farm profit. Additionally, many of the cultural control tactics discussed in this review have been tested individually. However, these approaches may have synergistic effects with other management tactics and should be studied in combination to develop the most effective IPM programs for specific farming scenarios. It will also be important to continue testing these tactics in collaboration with commercial fruit growers, as this will allow for further evaluation of feasibility and effectiveness across different farming operations. Such trials, in combination with a demonstrated environmental, social and economic benefit, will encourage grower adoption.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, T.S., M.T.L., H.J.B., M.G., R.I., D.R., M.R., N.R., A.A.S., V.M.W., and K.A.H.; writing—Sections1, 2.2, 2.2.1 and4, T.S., M.T.L., and K.A.H.; writing—Sections 2.1, 2.1.1 and 2.1.2, M.R.; writing—Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, D.R. and V.M.W.; writing—Sections 2.3 and 2.4, N.R., M.G., and R.I.; writing—Section 2.5, H.J.B.; writing—Section 3.1, V.M.W.; writing— Section 3.2, H.J.B. and R.I.; review and editing, T.S., M.T.L., H.J.B., M.G., R.I., D.R., M.R., N.R., A.A.S., V.M.W., and K.A.H.; funding acquisition, M.R., V.M.W., R.I., H.J.B., K.A.H., and A.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research was funded by the Organic Research and Extension Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Award No. 2018-51300-28434. Acknowledgments: We thank the many growers and research station managers who have hosted the experiments described in this review, and our project advisory board for their many insights. We thank Naiade Caparelli of Art’n’Science Caparelli for figure and table illustrations. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References 1. Barzman, M.; Bàrberi, P.; Birch, A.N.E.; Boonekamp, P.; Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S.; Graf, B.; Hommel, B.; Jensen, J.E.; Kiss, J.; Kudsk, P. Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 1199–1215. [CrossRef] 2. Rechcigl, J.E.; Rechcigl, N.A. Insect Pest Management: Techniques for Environmental Protection; CRC Press: Chelsea, MI, USA, 2000. 3. Halaj, J.; Cady, A.B.; Uetz, G.W. Modular habitat refugia enhance generalist predators and lower plant damage in soybeans. Environ. Entomol. 2000, 29, 383–393. [CrossRef] Insects 2021, 12, 172 14 of 18

4. Lawton, J. Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1983, 28, 23–39. [CrossRef] 5. Bushway, L.; Pritts, M.; Handley, D. Raspberry and Blackberry Production Guide for the Northeast, Midwest, and Eastern Canada; Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service (NRAES): Ithaca, NY, USA, 2008; Volume 35. 6. Krugner, R.; Groves, R.L.; Johnson, M.W.; Flores, A.P.; Hagler, J.R.; Morse, J.G. Seasonal population dynamics of Homalodisca vit- ripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in sweet orange trees maintained under continuous deficit irrigation. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 960–973. [CrossRef] 7. Kührt, U.; Samietz, J.; Dorn, S. Effect of plant architecture and hail nets on temperature of codling moth habitats in apple orchards. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2006, 118, 245–259. [CrossRef] 8. Simon, S.; Lauri, P.-E.; Brun, L.; Defrance, H.; Sauphanor, B. Does manipulation of fruit-tree architecture affect the development of pests and pathogens? A case study in an organic apple orchard. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2006, 81, 765–773. [CrossRef] 9. Asplen, M.K.; Anfora, G.; Biondi, A.; Choi, D.-S.; Chu, D.; Daane, K.M.; Gibert, P.; Gutierrez, A.P.; Hoelmer, K.A.; Hutchison, W.D. Invasion biology of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): A global perspective and future priorities. J. Pest Sci. 2015, 88, 469–494. [CrossRef] 10. Kienzle, R.; Groß, L.B.; Caughman, S.; Rohlfs, M. Resource use by individual Drosophila suzukii reveals a flexible preference for oviposition into healthy fruits. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3132. [CrossRef][PubMed] 11. Cai, P.; Song, Y.; Yi, C.; Zhang, Q.; Xia, H.; Lin, J.; Zhang, H.; Yang, J.; Ji, Q.; Chen, J. Potential host fruits for Drosophila suzukii: Olfactory and oviposition preferences and suitability for development. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2019, 167, 880–890. [CrossRef] 12. Olazcuaga, L.; Rode, N.O.; Foucaud, J.; Facon, B.; Ravigné, V.; Ausset, A.; Leménager, N.; Loiseau, A.; Gautier, M.; Estoup, A. Oviposition preference and larval performance of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae), spotted-wing Drosophila: Effects of fruit identity and composition. Environ. Entomol. 2019, 48, 867–881. [CrossRef] 13. Walsh, D.B.; O’Neal, S.D.; Bolda, M.P.; Goodhue, R.E.; Dreves, A.J.; Bruck, D.J.; Lee, J.; Walton, V.M.; Zalom, F.G. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Invasive Pest of Ripening Soft Fruit Expanding its Geographic Range and Damage Potential. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2011, 2, G1–G7. [CrossRef] 14. Lee, J.C.; Bruck, D.J.; Curry, H.; Edwards, D.; Haviland, D.R.; Van Steenwyk, R.A.; Yorgey, B.M. The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 1358–1367. [CrossRef][PubMed] 15. Emiljanowicz, L.M.; Ryan, G.D.; Langille, A.; Newman, J. Development, reproductive output and population growth of the fruit fly pest Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) on artificial diet. J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 1392–1398. [CrossRef] 16. Wiman, N.G.; Walton, V.M.; Dalton, D.T.; Anfora, G.; Burrack, H.J.; Chiu, J.C.; Daane, K.M.; Grassi, A.; Miller, B.; Tochen, S. Integrating temperature-dependent life table data into a matrix projection model for Drosophila suzukii population estimation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106909. [CrossRef] 17. Tochen, S.; Dalton, D.T.; Wiman, N.; Hamm, C.; Shearer, P.W.; Walton, V.M. Temperature-related development and population parameters for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) on cherry and blueberry. Environ. Entomol. 2014, 43, 501–510. [CrossRef] 18. DiGiacomo, G.; Hadrich, J.; Hutchison, W.D.; Peterson, H.; Rogers, M. Economic impact of spotted wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) yield loss on Minnesota raspberry farms: A grower survey. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2019, 10, 11. [CrossRef] 19. Farnsworth, D.; Hamby, K.A.; Bolda, M.; Goodhue, R.E.; Williams, J.C.; Zalom, F.G. Economic analysis of revenue losses and control costs associated with the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura), in the California raspberry industry. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 1083–1090. [CrossRef] 20. Mazzi, D.; Bravin, E.; Meraner, M.; Finger, R.; Kuske, S. Economic impact of the introduction and establishment of Drosophila suzukii on sweet cherry production in Switzerland. Insects 2017, 8, 18. [CrossRef][PubMed] 21. Benito, N.P.; Lopes-da-Silva, M.; Santos, R.S.S.d. Potential spread and economic impact of invasive Drosophila suzukii in Brazil. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2016, 51, 571–578. [CrossRef] 22. De Ros, G.; Conci, S.; Pantezzi, T.; Savini, G. The economic impact of invasive pest Drosophila suzukii on berry production in the Province of Trento, . J. Berry Res. 2015, 5, 89–96. [CrossRef] 23. Goodhue, R.E.; Bolda, M.; Farnsworth, D.; Williams, J.C.; Zalom, F.G. Spotted wing drosophila infestation of California strawberries and raspberries: Economic analysis of potential revenue losses and control costs. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 1396–1402. [CrossRef] 24. Jones, B.A. Invasive Species Control, Agricultural Pesticide Use, and Infant Health Outcomes. Land Econ. 2020, 96, 149–170. [CrossRef] 25. Van Timmeren, S.; Isaacs, R. Control of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, by specific insecticides and by conventional and organic crop protection programs. Crop Prot. 2013, 54, 126–133. [CrossRef] 26. USDA-NASS. 2017 Census of Agriculture: U.S. Summary and State Data Volume 1, Geographic Area Series, Part 51; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. 27. Demchak, K. Small fruit production in high tunnels. HortTechnology 2009, 19, 44–49. [CrossRef] 28. Hall, H.K.; Funt, R.C. Blackberries and their Hybrids. Crop Production Science in Horticulture; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2017; Volume 27. 29. Strik, B.C. A review of optimal systems for organic production of blueberry and blackberry for fresh and processed markets in the northwestern United States. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 208, 92–103. [CrossRef] 30. Finn, C.; Strik, B. Blackberry production in the Pacific northwestern US: A long history and a bright future. In Proceedings of the XI International Rubus and Ribes Symposium, Asheville, NC, USA, 21–24 June 2015; pp. 35–44. Insects 2021, 12, 172 15 of 18

31. Olmstead, J.W.; Finn, C.E. Breeding highbush blueberry cultivars adapted to machine harvest for the fresh market. HortTechnology 2014, 24, 290–294. [CrossRef] 32. Joshi, N.; Butler, B.; Demchak, K.; Biddinger, D. Seasonal occurrence of spotted wing drosophila in various small fruits and berries in Pennsylvania and Maryland. J. Appl. Entomol. 2017, 141, 156–160. [CrossRef] 33. Wang, X.-G.; Stewart, T.J.; Biondi, A.; Chavez, B.A.; Ingels, C.; Caprile, J.; Grant, J.A.; Walton, V.M.; Daane, K.M. Population dynamics and ecology of Drosophila suzukii in Central California. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 701–712. [CrossRef] 34. Hamby, K.; Bolda, M.; Sheehan, M.; Zalom, F. Seasonal monitoring for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in California commercial raspberries. Environ. Entomol. 2014, 43, 1008–1018. [CrossRef] 35. Ryan, G.D.; Emiljanowicz, L.; Wilkinson, F.; Kornya, M.; Newman, J.A. Thermal tolerances of the spotted-wing Drosophila Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 746–752. [CrossRef] 36. Fanning, P.D.; Johnson, A.E.; Luttinen, B.E.; Espeland, E.M.; Jahn, N.T.; Isaacs, R. Behavioral and physiological resistance to desiccation in spotted wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environ. Entomol. 2019, 48, 792–798. [CrossRef] 37. Green, C.K.; Moore, P.J.; Sial, A.A. Impact of heat stress on development and fertility of Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Physiol. 2019, 114, 45–52. [CrossRef][PubMed] 38. Kinjo, H.; Kunimi, Y.; Nakai, M. Effects of temperature on the reproduction and development of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2014, 49, 297–304. [CrossRef] 39. Hooper, H.; Grieshop, M.J. Postharvest Burial of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Infested Fruit Waste Reduces Adult Emergence. Environ. Entomol. 2020, 49, 59–65. [CrossRef][PubMed] 40. Leach, H.; Moses, J.; Hanson, E.; Fanning, P.; Isaacs, R. Rapid harvest schedules and fruit removal as non-chemical approaches for managing spotted wing Drosophila. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 219–226. [CrossRef] 41. Alnajjar, G.; Collins, J.; Drummond, F.A. Behavioral and preventative management of Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Maine wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) through attract and kill trapping and insect exclusion-netting. Int. J. Entomol. Nematol. 2017, 3, 51–61. 42. Leach, H.; Van Timmeren, S.; Isaacs, R. Exclusion netting delays and reduces Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) infestation in raspberries. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 2151–2158. [CrossRef] 43. Kamiyama, M.T.; Guédot, C. Varietal and developmental susceptibility of tart cherry (Rosales: Rosaceae) to Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 1789–1797. [CrossRef] 44. Poyet, M.; Eslin, P.; Héraude, M.; Le Roux, V.; Prévost, G.; Gibert, P.; Chabrerie, O. Invasive host for invasive pest: When the Asiatic cherry fly (Drosophila suzukii) meets the American black cherry (Prunus serotina) in . Agric. For. Entomol. 2014, 16, 251–259. [CrossRef] 45. Burrack, H.J.; Fernandez, G.E.; Spivey, T.; Kraus, D.A. Variation in selection and utilization of host crops in the field and laboratory by Drosophila suzukii Matsumara (Diptera: Drosophilidae), an invasive frugivore. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 69, 1173–1180. [CrossRef] 46. Wöhner, T.; Pinggera, J.; Fritzsche, E.; Peil, A.; Pinczinger, D.; Hanke, M.V. Insights into the susceptibility of raspberries to Drosophila suzukii oviposition. J. Appl. Entomol. 2020.[CrossRef] 47. Ehret, D.L.; Frey, B.; Forge, T.; Helmer, T.; Bryla, D.R.; Zebarth, B.J. Effects of nitrogen rate and application method on early production and fruit quality in highbush blueberry. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 94, 1165–1179. [CrossRef] 48. Ehret, D.L.; Frey, B.; Forge, T.; Helmer, T.; Bryla, D.R. Effects of drip irrigation configuration and rate on yield and fruit quality of young highbush blueberry plants. HortScience 2012, 47, 414–421. [CrossRef] 49. Gong, X.; Bräcker, L.; Bölke, N.; Plata, C.; Zeitlmayr, S.; Metzler, D.; Olbricht, K.; Gompel, N.; Parniske, M. Strawberry accessions with reduced Drosophila suzukii emergence from fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1880. [CrossRef] 50. Bräcker, L.B.; Gong, X.; Schmid, C.; Dawid, C.; Ulrich, D.; Phung, T.; Leonhard, A.; Ainsworth, J.; Olbricht, K.; Parniske, M. A strawberry accession with elevated methyl anthranilate fruit concentration is naturally resistant to the pest fly Drosophila suzukii. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234040. [CrossRef][PubMed] 51. Tonina, L.; Giomi, F.; Sancassani, M.; Ajelli, M.; Mori, N.; Giongo, L. Texture features explain the susceptibility of grapevine cultivars to Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) infestation in ripening and drying grapes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10245. [CrossRef] 52. Jaffe, B.; Guedot, C. Vertical and temporal distribution of spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) and pollinators within cultivated raspberries. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019.[CrossRef][PubMed] 53. Drummond, F.; Ballman, E.; Collins, J. Population dynamics of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura)) in Maine wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton). Insects 2019, 10, 205. [CrossRef][PubMed] 54. Hampton, E.; Koski, C.; Barsoian, O.; Faubert, H.; Cowles, R.S.; Alm, S.R. Use of early ripening cultivars to avoid infesta- tion and mass trapping to manage Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericales: Ericaceae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 1849–1857. [CrossRef][PubMed] 55. Schöneberg, T.; Arsenault-Benoit, A.; Taylor, C.M.; Butler, B.R.; Dalton, D.T.; Walton, V.M.; Petran, A.; Rogers, M.A.; Diepenbrock, L.M.; Burrack, H.J.; et al. Pruning of small fruit crops can affect habitat suitability for Drosophila suzukii. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 294, 106860. [CrossRef] 56. Leach, H.; Van Timmeren, S.; Wetzel, W.; Isaacs, R. Predicting within-and between-year variation in activity of the invasive spotted wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in a temperate region. Environ. Entomol. 2019, 48, 1223–1233. [CrossRef] Insects 2021, 12, 172 16 of 18

57. Janke, R.R.; Altamimi, M.E.; Khan, M. The use of high tunnels to produce fruit and vegetable crops in . Agric. Sci. 2017, 8, 692–715. [CrossRef] 58. Stockton, D.G.; Hesler, S.P.; Wallingford, A.K.; Leskey, T.C.; McDermott, L.; Elsensohn, J.E.; Riggs, D.I.M.; Pritts, M.; Loeb, G.M. Factors affecting the implementation of exclusion netting to control Drosophila suzukii on primocane raspberry. Crop Prot. 2020, 105191. [CrossRef] 59. Rogers, M.A.; Burkness, E.C.; Hutchison, W.D. Evaluation of high tunnels for management of Drosophila suzukii in fall-bearing red raspberries: Potential for reducing insecticide use. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 815–821. [CrossRef] 60. Cormier, D.; Veilleux, J.; Firlej, A. Exclusion net to control spotted wing Drosophila in blueberry fields. IOBC-WPRS Bull. 2015, 109, 181–184. 61. McDermott, L.; Nickerson, L. Evaluation of insect exclusion and mass trapping as cultural controls of spotted wing Drosophila in organic blueberry production. N. Y. Fruit. Q. 2014, 22, 25–28. 62. Kuesel, R.; Scott Hicks, D.; Archer, K.; Sciligo, A.; Bessin, R.; Gonthier, D. Effects of fine-mesh exclusion netting on pests of blackberry. Insects 2019, 10, 249. [CrossRef] 63. Ebbenga, D.N.; Burkness, E.C.; Hutchison, W.D. Evaluation of exclusion netting for spotted-wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophil- idae) management in Minnesota wine grapes. J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 2287–2294. [CrossRef] 64. Tochen, S.; Woltz, J.; Dalton, D.; Lee, J.; Wiman, N.; Walton, V. Humidity affects populations of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberry. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 47–57. [CrossRef] 65. Haye, T.; Girod, P.; Cuthbertson, A.; Wang, X.; Daane, K.; Hoelmer, K.; Baroffio, C.; Zhang, J.; Desneux, N. Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 643–651. [CrossRef] 66. Kraus, C.; Pennington, T.; Herzog, K.; Hecht, A.; Fischer, M.; Voegele, R.T.; Hoffmann, C.; Töpfer, R.; Kicherer, A. Effects of canopy architecture and microclimate on grapevine health in two training systems. Vitis 2018, 57, 53–60. 67. Diepenbrock, L.; Burrack, H. Variation of within-crop microhabitat use by Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blackberry. J. Appl. Entomol. 2017, 141, 1–7. [CrossRef] 68. Heuvel, J.E.V.; Proctor, J.T.; Sullivan, J.A. Trellising system and cane density affect yield and fruit quality of red raspberry. HortScience 2000, 35, 1215–1219. [CrossRef] 69. Prange, R.K.; DeEll, J.R. Preharvest factors affecting postharvest quality of berry crops. HortScience 1997, 32, 824–830. [CrossRef] 70. Yeary, W.; Fulcher, A.; Zhu, H.; Klingeman, W.; Grant, J. Spray Penetration and Natural Enemy Survival in Dense and Sparse Plant Canopies Treated with Carbaryl: Implications for Chemical and Biological Control. J. Environ. Hortic. 2018, 36, 21–29. [CrossRef] 71. Cross, J.; Walklate, P.; Murray, R.; Richardson, G. Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 1. Effects of spray liquid flow rate. Crop Prot. 2001, 20, 13–30. [CrossRef] 72. Ballman, E.S.; Collins, J.A.; Drummond, F.A. Pupation Behavior and Predation on Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Pupae in Maine Wild Blueberry Fields. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 2308–2317. [CrossRef] 73. Woltz, J.M.; Lee, J.C. Pupation behavior and larval and pupal biocontrol of Drosophila suzukii in the field. Biol. Control 2017, 110, 62–69. [CrossRef] 74. Kader, M.; Senge, M.; Mojid, M.; Ito, K. Recent advances in mulching materials and methods for modifying soil environment. Soil Tillage Res. 2017, 168, 155–166. [CrossRef] 75. Kasirajan, S.; Ngouajio, M. Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 501–529. [CrossRef] 76. Tarara, J.M. Microclimate modification with plastic mulch. HortScience 2000, 35, 169–180. [CrossRef] 77. Xuemei, J.; Qiong, Y.; Ya, W.; Yanmei, L.; Yongqiang, Z.; Rangjin, X.; Shaolan, H.; Lie, D.; Shilai, Y.; Qiang, L. Effects of DuPont Tyvek®® non-woven material mulching on fruit quality and chlorophyll fluorescence in Wanzhou Rose Orange. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 219, 31–36. [CrossRef] 78. Rendon, D.; Hamby, K.A.; Arsenault-Benoit, A.L.; Taylor, C.M.; Evans, R.K.; Roubos, C.R.; Sial, A.A.; Rogers, M.; Petran, A.; Van Timmeren, S. Mulching as a cultural control strategy for Drosophila suzukii in blueberry. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 55–66. [CrossRef][PubMed] 79. Iglesias, L.E.; Liburd, O.E. The effect of border sprays and between-row soil tillage on Drosophila suzukii in organic blackberry production. J. Appl. Entomol. 2017, 141, 19–27. [CrossRef] 80. Knapp, L.; Mazzi, D.; Finger, R. Management strategies against Drosophila suzukii: Insights into Swiss grape growers choices. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2820–2829. [CrossRef] 81. Perfect, T. Irrigation as a factor influencing the management of agricultural pests. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1986, 316, 347–354. [CrossRef] 82. Daane, K.; Williams, L. Manipulating vineyard irrigation amounts to reduce insect pest damage. Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13, 1650–1666. [CrossRef] 83. Rendon, D.; Walton, V.M. Drip and overhead sprinkler irrigation in blueberry as cultural control for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Northwestern United States. J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 745–752. [CrossRef] 84. Evans, R.K.; Toews, M.D.; Sial, A.A. Diel periodicity of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) under field conditions. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171718. [CrossRef][PubMed] Insects 2021, 12, 172 17 of 18

85. Van Timmeren, S.; Horejsi, L.; Larson, S.; Spink, K.; Fanning, P.; Isaacs, R. Diurnal Activity of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophil- idae) in Highbush Blueberry and Behavioral Response to Irrigation and Application of Insecticides. Environ. Entomol. 2017, 46, 1106–1114. [CrossRef][PubMed] 86. Gautam, B.K.; Little, B.A.; Taylor, M.D.; Jacobs, J.L.; Lovett, W.E.; Holland, R.M.; Sial, A.A. Effect of simulated rainfall on the effectiveness of insecticides against spotted wing drosophila in blueberries. Crop Prot. 2016, 81, 122–128. [CrossRef] 87. Andika, I.P.; Vandervoort, C.; Wise, J.C. Rainfastness of Insecticides Used to Control Spotted-Wing Drosophila in Tart Cherry Production. Insects 2019, 10, 203. [CrossRef] 88. Mazzetto, F.; Lessio, F.; Giacosa, S.; Rolle, L.; Alma, A. Relationships between Drosophila suzukii and grapevine in North-western Italy: Seasonal presence and cultivar susceptibility. Bull. Insectol. 2020, 73, 29–38. 89. Stockton, D.G.; Brown, R.; Loeb, G.M. Not berry hungry? Discovering the hidden food sources of a small fruit specialist, Drosophila suzukii. Ecol. Entomol. 2019, 44, 810–822. [CrossRef] 90. Bal, H.K.; Adams, C.; Grieshop, M. Evaluation of off-season potential breeding sources for spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii Matsumura) in Michigan. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 2466–2470. [CrossRef] 91. Kirkpatrick, D.M.; Gut, L.J.; Miller, J.R. Estimating monitoring trap plume reach and trapping area for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Michigan tart cherry. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 1285–1289. [CrossRef][PubMed] 92. Tait, G.; Grassi, A.; Pfab, F.; Crava, C.M.; Dalton, D.T.; Magarey, R.; Ometto, L.; Vezzulli, S.; Rossi-Stacconi, M.V.; Gottardello, A. Large-scale spatial dynamics of Drosophila suzukii in Trentino, Italy. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 1213–1224. [CrossRef] 93. Lee, J.C.; Dreves, A.J.; Cave, A.M.; Kawai, S.; Isaacs, R.; Miller, J.C.; Van Timmeren, S.; Bruck, D.J. Infestation of wild and ornamental noncrop fruits by Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2015, 108, 117–129. [CrossRef] 94. Yeh, D.A.; Drummond, F.A.; Gómez, M.I.; Fan, X. The Economic Impacts and Management of Spotted Wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii): The Case of Wild Blueberries in Maine. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 1262–1269. [CrossRef] 95. Lee, J.C.; Bruck, D.J.; Dreves, A.J.; Ioriatti, C.; Vogt, H.; Baufeld, P. In focus: Spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, across perspectives. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 1349–1351. [CrossRef] 96. Hooper, H.; Grieshop, M.J. Composting susceptible fruit wastes reduces Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) reproductive habitat. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020.[CrossRef][PubMed] 97. Miranda, C.D.; Cammack, J.A.; Tomberlin, J.K. Interspecific Competition between the House Fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Mus- cidae) and Black Soldier Fly, Hermetia illucens (L.) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) When Reared on Poultry Manure. Insects 2019, 10, 440. [CrossRef][PubMed] 98. Sheppard, C. House fly and lesser fly control utilizing the black soldier fly in manure management systems for caged laying hens. Environ. Entomol. 1983, 12, 1439–1442. [CrossRef] 99. Mangan, R.L.; Hallman, G.J. Temperature treatments for quarantine security: New approaches for fresh commodities. In Tempera- ture Sensitivity in Insects and Application in Integrated Pest Management; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1998; pp. 201–234. 100. Strachan, L.A.; Tarnowski-Garner, H.E.; Marshall, K.E.; Sinclair, B.J. The evolution of cold tolerance in Drosophila larvae. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2011, 84, 43–53. [CrossRef] 101. Rajamohan, A.; Sinclair, B.J. Hardening trumps acclimation in improving cold tolerance of larvae. Physiol. Entomol. 2009, 34, 217–223. [CrossRef] 102. Aly, M.F.; Kraus, D.A.; Burrack, H.J. Effects of postharvest cold storage on the development and survival of immature Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in artificial diet and fruit. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 87–93. [CrossRef][PubMed] 103. Kraft, L.J.; Yeh, D.A.; Gómez, M.I.; Burrack, H.J. Determining the Effect of Postharvest Cold Storage Treatment on the Survival of Immature Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Small Fruits. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020.[CrossRef][PubMed] 104. Jakobs, R.; Gariepy, T.D.; Sinclair, B.J. Adult plasticity of cold tolerance in a continental-temperate population of Drosophila suzukii. J. Insect Physiol. 2015, 79, 1–9. [CrossRef] 105. Stephens, A.; Asplen, M.; Hutchison, W.D.; Venette, R.C. Cold hardiness of winter-acclimated Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophil- idae) adults. Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 1619–1626. [CrossRef][PubMed] 106. Stockton, D.G.; Wallingford, A.K.; Loeb, G.M. Phenotypic plasticity promotes overwintering survival in a globally invasive crop pest, Drosophila suzukii. Insects 2018, 9, 105. [CrossRef] 107. Stockton, D.G.; Wallingford, A.K.; Brind’amore, G.; Diepenbrock, L.; Burrack, H.; Leach, H.; Isaacs, R.; Iglesias, L.E.; Liburd, O.; Drummond, F. Seasonal polyphenism of spotted-wing Drosophila is affected by variation in local abiotic conditions within its invaded range, likely influencing survival and regional population dynamics. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 7669–7685. [CrossRef] 108. Stockton, D.; Wallingford, A.; Rendon, D.; Fanning, P.; Green, C.K.; Diepenbrock, L.; Ballman, E.; Walton, V.M.; Isaacs, R.; Leach, H. Interactions between biotic and abiotic factors affect survival in overwintering Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environ. Entomol. 2019, 48, 454–464. [CrossRef] 109. Jakobs, R.; Ahmadi, B.; Houben, S.; Gariepy, T.D.; Sinclair, B.J. Cold tolerance of third-instar Drosophila suzukii larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 2017, 96, 45–52. [CrossRef] 110. Follett, P.A.; Yang, M.-M.; Lu, K.-H.; Chen, T.-W. Irradiation for postharvest control of quarantine insects. Formos. Entomol. 2007, 27, 1–15. 111. Tucker, J. Impact of Fumigation and Irradiation Requirements on Organic Imports; United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service National Organic Program: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. Insects 2021, 12, 172 18 of 18

112. Follett, P.A.; Swedman, A.; Price, D.K. Postharvest irradiation treatment for quarantine control of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in fresh commodities. J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 964–969. [CrossRef][PubMed] 113. Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Park, C.G. X-ray radiation and developmental inhibition of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophili- dae). Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2016, 92, 849–854. [CrossRef][PubMed] 114. Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Lee, Y.J.; Park, C.G. Developmental inhibition of Drosophila suzukii by ionizing radiation. Entomol. Res. 2018, 48, 331–338. [CrossRef] 115. Follett, P.A.; Neven, L.G. Current trends in quarantine entomology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 359–385. [CrossRef][PubMed] 116. Follett, P.A.; Swedman, A.; Mackey, B. Effect of low-oxygen conditions created by modified atmosphere packaging on radiation tolerance in Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in sweet cherries. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 141–145. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 117. Da Silva, C.S.B.; Park, K.R.; Blood, R.A.; Walton, V.M. Intraspecific competition affects the pupation behavior of spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7775. 118. Da Silva, C.S.B.; Price, B.E.; Walton, V.M. Water-deprived parasitic wasps (Pachycrepoideus vindemmiae) kill more pupae of a pest (Drosophila suzukii) as a water-intake strategy. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3592. 119. Strik, B.; Buller, G.; Hellman, E. Pruning severity affects yield, berry weight, and hand harvest efficiency of highbush blueberry. HortScience 2003, 38, 196–199. [CrossRef] 120. Stacconi, R.; Tait, G.; Rendon, D.; Grassi, A.; Boyer, G.; Nieri, R.; Walton, V. Gumming up the Works: Field Tests of a New Food-Grade Gum as Behavioral Disruptor for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Econ Entomol. 2020, 113, 1872–1880. [CrossRef][PubMed] 121. Tait, G.; Kaiser, C.; Stacconi, R.; Dalton, D.T.; Anfora, G.; Walton, V.M. A food-grade gum as a management tool for Drosophila suzukii. Bull. Insectology 2018, 71, 295–307. 122. Cornell CALS. Netting against Spotted Wing Drosophila in Berries. Available online: https://www.hortidaily.com/article/9245 088/netting-against-spotted-wing-drosophila-in-berries/ (accessed on 13 November 2020). 123. Briassoulis, D.; Babou, E.; Hiskakis, M.; Scarascia, G.; Picuno, P.; Guarde, D.; Dejean, C. Review, mapping and analysis of the agricultural plastic waste generation and consolidation in Europe. Waste Manag. Res. 2013, 31, 1262–1278. [CrossRef] 124. Goldberger, J.R.; DeVetter, L.W.; Dentzman, K.E. Polyethylene and biodegradable plastic mulches for strawberry production in the United States: Experiences and opinions of growers in three regions. HortTechnology 2019, 29, 619–628. [CrossRef] 125. Moore, J.; Wszelaki, A. Plastic Mulch in Fruit and Vegetable Production: Challenges for Disposal; Washington State University Extension Fact Sheet FA-2016-02: Pullman, WA, USA, 2016. 126. Bonhotal, J.; Bonacquist-Currin, M. Agricultural Plastics Recycling in New York State Case Study; Cornell Waste Management Institute: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2019. 127. Kyrikou, I.; Briassoulis, D. Biodegradation of agricultural plastic films: A critical review. J. Polym. Environ. 2007, 15, 125–150. [CrossRef]