<<

PICK YOUR POISON

Associate Editor: Kevin C. Osterhoudt, MD, MSCE

Contributing Authors: Michael A. Darracq, MD, MPH, Jennifer Heppner, MD, Heather Lee, MD, and Patil Armenian, MD

Backyard Pool Party Not Your Typical

wo sisters, ages 7 and 10 years, present Tto their local community emergency department in extreme with blistering lesions to their hands, arms, and legs. Earlier in the evening, they noticed some reddened areas to their hands and back of legs after spending the day with 3 other neighborhood friends swimming in a backyard pool and making cool drinks during a hot (103 F) summer day in Central California. After go- ing to bed without distress, the sisters awak- ened screaming and complaining of burning sensation in all of the affected areas (Figs. 1–3). Vital signs, the remainder of the physical examination, and laboratory studies are otherwise unremarkable. Simultaneously, another of the neighborhood friends is at FIGURE 1. Partial thickness and superficial of the left thigh of the 10-year-old girl. the local center. Two additional girls present later the same night for evaluation with similar skin lesions. making limeade and lemonade drinks and All 5 children were evaluated in a Can you pick your poison? that they had been squeezing and throwing healthcare setting and 3 were hospitalized limes and lemons at one another during the for several days for pain management, top- CASE CONCLUSION AND afternoon pool party. After transfer of all of ical, and oral steroids (Table 1). Because DISCUSSION the girls to the local burn center, and consul- of the severity of pain resulting from tation with the toxicology and dressing changes, procedural sedation was Discrete blistering lesions raise con- specialists, it was determined that the - used during dressing changes over several cerns about a wide variety of chemical ex- ing was consistent with days of inpatient care. One month after posures as well as nonaccidental trauma. resulting from -juice exposure. discharge, all 5 girls had some degree The parents were asked extensively about intentionally inflicted injury, especially as 1 of the girls had a lesion on her back that had the appearance of a handprint and was thought to have been a bruise. None of the involved families had previous re- ports of physical abuse. A detailed expo- sure history for chemicals, , and medical comorbidities was negative in all of the involved girls. Because it became apparent that there were multiple victims, questions quickly shifted to assess common activities including potential shared expo- sures. The girls reported that they had been

Authors interested in submitting a case study in pe- diatric poisoning for the Pediatric Emergency Care feature Pick Your Poison are encouraged to contact the Section Editor, Kevin C. Osterhoudt, MD, via E-mail at [email protected]. Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer , Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0749-5161 DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001204 FIGURE 2. Partial thickness and superficial burns of the right hand of the 7-year-old girl.

440 www.pec-online.com Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 33, Number 6, June 2017

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 33, Number 6, June 2017 Pick Your Poison

vesicular lesions may be mistaken for a chemical burn, and may be mistaken for bruises. Cases that have prompted suspicions of child abuse have been described.2–5 in the shape of fingerprints and handprints may be present on areas where a child is likely to be held or touched. Alternatively, if the presents with a linear- or loop-shaped streaking from drips of juice or plant, or patterns of wiping away the juice, it may look similar to abuse patterns that result from flagellation or traumatic use of cords or ropes. On the other hand, this linear pat- tern may also be mistaken for areas of poi- son oak exposure, or even jellyfish envenomation, depending on a patient's history and potential recent environmental exposures.6 FIGURE 3. Partial thickness and superficial burns of the left hand of the 10-year-old girl. Various infectious processes may mimic phytophotodermatitis as well. Cellulitis, fungal of hyperpigmentation but noted that may result after photo- infections, herpes simplex or zoster, superficial significant fading had already occurred. toxic and photoallergic reactions. lymphangitis, and impetigo have been de- All girls had returned to regular activity. contribute to a phototoxic reaction when scribed.2,17 To differentiate between these con- Phytophotodermatitis may result after UVA light and phototoxic compounds com- ditions, careful examination of skin folds and dermal exposure to a photosensitizing agent bine and cause reactive oxygen species gen- potential for dermatome distribution must be and subsequent prolonged exposure. eration, DNA cross-linking, and prevention considered. Phytophotodermatitis will tend to Furocoumarins (psoralens), thought to be of growth and division.2,8 These lesions spare skin folds, presenting in only sun- involved in a plant's ability to fight fungal have an appearance similar to sunburn and exposed areas, and will not follow a derma- infections and regulate plant growth, do not require previous exposure and sensi- tome distribution. Furthermore, the rash will are commonly implicated photosensitizers. tization. This may result minutes to hours af- not generally be pruritic, but rather burning Limes and other contain the psoralens ter exposure. Bullae and vesicles in quality. and malaise suggest an infec- 5-methoxypsoralen, xanthotoxin, and limettin may also subsequently develop. Phototoxic tious cause or perhaps superinfection of an ini- that are thought to be the cause of this pho- agents including certain , diuretics, tial phytophotodermatitis. totoxic eruption after dermal exposure.1 and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Time, supportive care, and prevention Beach vacations, swimming pools, home- may induce phototoxicity.8 Photoallergic re- of further exposure to sunlight have been made lime-juice beverages, and drinking actions are rare, immunologic type-IV hyper- suggested as the most important compo- beer with lime are commonly described sensitivity reactions that are cell mediated, nents of care. Some photosensitizing drugs scenarios for this phenomenon.2–6 require previous sensitization, take more than have metabolites that remain in the skin for Psoralens are found in many types 25 hours after exposure to develop, and have weeks making avoidance of further UVA of wild and cultivated plants with a wide geo- an appearance similar to allergic contact exposure paramount; some fluorescent graphic distribution. The Umbelliferae (, eczema.8 lamps transmit UVA6 and it is also impor- carrot, or ), (citrus, bergamot), There is considerable overlap in the tant to know that UVA light may also travel Leguminosae (legumes, peas, or beans), and appearance of photodermatitis lesions through window glass. Cold compresses Moraceae (mulberry or fig) families of plants and other more commonly encountered and antihistamines may help to relieve dis- all contain psoralens and are commonly cited rashes and skin changes. The rash resulting comfort; however, topical and oral steroids causes of phytophotodermatitis.1–16 Although from phytophotodermatitis can be easily have also been recommended.7,11,13 Use most cases result from topical exposures, photo- misdiagnosed, both because it may be rela- of silver sulfadiazine and silver impreg- toxic burns have been reported after ingestion of tively unknown to the emergency providers nated nonadherent dressings has also been celery with subsequent UVexposure from a tan- who initially see these cases and because of described in the treatment of partial- ning booth.16 its relative rarity. The blisterin\g and thickness .5,7,13

TABLE 1. Detailed Description of Patient Presentations and Clinical Care

Patient Total Body Surface Distribution of Hospital Length Identification Age (y) Area Involved (%) Skin Findings Clinical Setting of Stay (d) 1 7 10 Face and bilateral upper extremities Burn unit 4 2 8 18 Face and bilateral upper and lower extremities Burn unit 3 3 9 8 Face, hands, and bilateral lower extremities Pediatric ward 3 4 9 5 Lips and left thigh Emergency department <1 5 10 10 Bilateral anterior thighs, bilateral Emergency department <1 anterior forearms, and lower abdomen

© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.pec-online.com 441

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Pick Your Poison Pediatric Emergency Care • Volume 33, Number 6, June 2017

Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation San Francisco-Fresno cross-sensitization phenomenon and remarks may develop after phototoxicity. Medical Education and Research on phytophotodermatitis. AMA Arch Derm. Although the exact mechanism remains un- Fresno, CA 1956;74:149–158. clear, proliferation and migra- 9. Hipkin CR. Phytophotodermatitis, a botanical tion and synthesis and thickening of the view. Lancet. 1991;338:892–893. stratum corneum have been proposed. Per- sistent hyperpigmentation has been treated REFERENCES 10. Drever JC, Hunter J. Giant hogweed . 11 Scott Med J. 1970;15:315–319. with bleaching agents such as hydroquinone. 1. Pathak MA, Daniels F Jr, Fitzpatrick TB. The Final Diagnosis: Phytophotodermatitis. presenhpy known fistrixuhion of furocoumarins 11. McCue AK. A mystery. Cow (psoralens) in plants. JInvestDermatol.1962; phytophotodermatitis. Wilderness Environ Med. – Michael A. Darracq, MD, MPH 39:225–239. 2007;18:156 159. Department of Emergency Medicine 12. Micali G, Nasca MR, Musumeci ML. Severe University of California 2. Greenaway C. A tropical skin eruption. Can J Infect Dis.2002;13:82–142. phototoxic reaction secondary to the application San Francisco-Fresno of a fig leaves' decoction used as a tanning 3. Weber IC, Davis CP, Greeson DM. Medical Education and Research agent. . 1995;33:212–213. Fresno, CA Phytophotodermatitis: the other “lime” disease. (e‐mail: [email protected]) JEmergMed. 1999;17:235–237. 13. Bollero D, Stella M, Rivolin A, et al. Fig leaf tanning lotion and sun-related 4. Moore AM, Chen SC. Linear lesions on the burns: case reports. Burns.2001;27: Jennifer Heppner, MD face. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68:2239–2240. 777–779. Department of Emergency Medicine 5. Mill J, Wallis B, Cuttle L, et al. University of California Phytophotodermatitis: case reports of children 14. Sforza M, Andjelkov K, Zaccheddu R. Severe San Francisco-Fresno presenting with blistering after preparing lime burn on 81% of body surface after . Medical Education and Research juice. Burns. 2008;34:731–733. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19: Fresno, CA 383–384. 6. Flugman SL. Mexican beer dermatitis: a unique 15. Egan CL, Sterling G. Phytophotodermatitis: a Heather Lee, MD variant of lime phytophotodermatitis attributable to contemporary beer-drinking visit to Margaritaville. Cutis.1993;51: Department of Internal Medicine 41–42. University of California practices. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146: 1194–1195. San Francisco-Fresno 16. Ljunggren B. Severe phototoxic burn following Medical Education and Research 7. Lutchman L, Inyang V,Hodgkinson D. celery ingestion. Arch Dermatol. 1990;126: – Fresno, CA Phytophotodermatitis associated with parsnip 1334 1336. picking. JAccidEmergMed. 1999;16: 17. Goskowicz MO, Friedlander SF, Eichenfield – Patil Armenian, MD 453 454. LF. Endemic “lime” disease: Department of Emergency Medicine 8. Kimmich JM, Klauder JV.Sensitization phytophotodermatitis in San Diego County. University of California dermatitis to carrots; report of Pediatrics. 1994;93:828–830.

442 www.pec-online.com © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.