DOCSLIB.ORG

Largest Law Firms December 2012 Top Largest Law Firms by Seher Hussain and Kanishk Verghese

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Largest Law Firms December 2012 Top Largest Law Firms by Seher Hussain and Kanishk Verghese MYANMAR INVESTMENT: NEW LAW RAISES HOPES BUT QUESTIONS LINGER DECEMBER2012 NORTH ASIA EDITION TOP LARGEST50 LAW FIRMS CLEARING THE FRESHFIELDS Q&A ASIA CALLING INSIDE CLOUDS Key insight from Inside the booming Taiwan and China sign Freshfields’ managing telecom industry in Asia n THE BIG STORY 04 investor protection deal partner n DEALS SPOTLIGHT 06 n LEAGUE TABLES 12 n SUNDRIES 59 PAGE 32 PAGE 40 PAGE 46 ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS 16 ALB TOP 50 larGEST laW FIRMS december 2012 TOP LARGEST LAW FIRMS By Seher Hussain and Kanishk Verghese Total Fee- ALB MethODOLOgy Rank Firm Headquarters Partners Associates earners^ 1 Dacheng Law Offices China 749 1428 2676 TOP 50 research EXplained: 50— 2 Beijing Yingke Law Firm China 567 1053 1820 - Firms were contacted in July 2012, 3 King & Wood Mallesons China 226 955 1181 and asked to supply numbers of 4 Grandall Law Firm China 215 580 1112 partners and lawyers across their 5 DeHeng Law Offices China 187 763 1106 operations in Asia. 6 Baker & McKenzie U.S. 247 639 1100 7 Zhong Yin Law Firm China 117 584 960 - Total fee-earners equals the universal subset of all timekeepers, 8 AllBright Law Offices China 184 671 940 including associates, partners, 9 Kim & Chang South Korea 120 N/A 800 counsel, foreign counsel (including 10 Zhong Lun Law Firm China 203 560 747 lawyers on secondment from alliance Amarchand & Mangaldas & 11 India 68 467 533 firms) and consultants. Trainees or Suresh A Shroff & Co pupils were not counted among fee- 12 Jun He Law Offices China 149 299 482 earners. 13 Nishimura & Asahi Japan 95 321 474 14 Guanghe Law Firm China 112 348 455 - In the case of international law firms, 15 Lee & Ko South Korea 128 225 436 only Asia-based partners, associates, 16 Zhonglun W&D Law Firm China 98 320 418 and fee-earners were counted. 17 Lee and Li Taiwan 53 327 380 - Where two firms have the same 18 Clifford Chance* UK 58 186 359 headcount figure, the firm with the 19 Allen & Gledhill Singapore 136 184 357 higher number of partners was ranked 20 Shin & Kim South Korea 118 159 356 higher. 21 Rajah & Tann Singapore 117 172 355 22 Linklaters UK 53 215 352 - Australia and New Zealand firms 23 Guangdong Sun Law Firm China 35 234 350 and headcounts were excluded from 24 Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Japan 82 227 340 this ranking. 25 Anderson Mori & Tomotsune Japan 84 207 325 WWW.LEGALBUSINESSONLINE.COM : @ALB_Magazine : Connect with Asian Legal Business ALB TOP 50 laRGEST laW FIRMS 17 hile the global economy remains stagnant, Asia con- firms in Asia. Six South Korean firms are top 50 contenders, while tinues to be the standard bearer of growth. Sure, the Japanese and Indian firms claim five spots each. Singaporean firms rumblings of an unsettled European economy and a nab four places, with one firm from both Hong Kong and Taiwan fea- flagging U.S. market have taken its toll in the East. Yet, turing in the table. International firms – mostly from the UK – account WAsia’s number of wealthy is fast increasing, its middle class is bur- for nine of the largest 50 firms in Asia. geoning, and its companies are expanding abroad. The legal market Taking a closer look, Asia’s top 50 features five Indian firms - two is capitalising on these opportunities. The past year has seen many fewer than last year - but still indicates consolidated growth as international law firms set up new offices in the region, the creation of Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co moves up one place several domestic firms, a host of mergers, and the consistent growth as the 11th largest firm in Asia with 533 fee-earners. Fox Mandal finds of existing Asian practices through lateral hires, internal promotions, itself out of the table, given its recent demerger with Little & Co, while and relocations. While many recently established Asian offices may stalwarts J Sagar Associates, Luthra & Luthra, Khaitan & Co, and AZB not boast the headcount to ensure a place in ALB’s largest law firm & Partners continue to make a strong showing. Market sources point to LARGEST tables, the message is clear that the Asian legal market is a highly corporate outsourcing as another driver of growth in the Asian market; competitive one. as multinational corporations outsource more legal work, demand for The top three largest law firms by headcount in Asia who retain legal services in low-cost locations is also spiralling upwards. Our India their spots from last year are: Chinese firms Dacheng Law Offices and table has expanded to 20 firms to match this trend. LAW Beijing Yingke Law Firm, and recently merged King & Wood Mallesons. Moving further southeast, the race to be the largest firm in Dacheng Law Offices claims pole position with 2,676 fee-earners, Singapore heats up considerably as Allen & Gledhill reclaims first boasting 800 fee-earners more than that of second-placed Beijing place from Rajah & Tann by a mere two lawyers. This year we feature a Yingke Law Firm. King & Wood Mallesons remains the third-largest separate table for international firms based in Singapore, highlighting firm in Asia, and has grown considerably following the merger be- the growing importance of the city-state to the Asian legal market. FIRMS tweenRank King & WoodFirm and Australian firmHeadquarters Mallesons StephenPartners JaquesAssociates Large internationalTotal Fee- firms continue to hungrily enter Singapore in an earners^ in March this year. attempt to expand their footprint, and align themselves with Asia’s Partly1 Dachengdue to the Law size Offices of its domesticChina market, Chinese firms749 domi- 1428high growth2676 economies. This burst of firm openings as well as a sig- nate2 the tableBeijing again Yingke this Law year, Firm representingChina 19 out of the 50567 largest 1053nificant number1820 of partner relocations for already-established teams 3 King & Wood Mallesons China 226 955 1181 has propelled explosive growth, warranting an international firms table that is hotly com- 26 TMI Associates* Japan 66 215 311 petitive, with Ashurst and Watson, Farley & 27 Mori Hamada & Matsumoto* Japan 95 189 307 Williams tied with 42 fee-earners each. 28 Yulchon South Korea 90 170 307 Finally, the highest placed international 29 Zhongcheng Renhe Law Firm China 78 275 307 firm on our list, Baker & McKenzie in the 6th position with 1,100 fee-earners, elected 68 30 Yoon & Yang* South Korea 100 154 301 lawyers this year to partnership. Of those, 31 Khaitan & Co India 58 242 300 almost half were based in Asia-Pacific. 32 Luthra & Luthra India 44 246 290 Ultimately, the numbers do not lie; it has 33 Allen & Overy* UK 46 164 287 been a prosperous year for the Asian market as demand for legal services continues at a 34 Bae, Kim & Lee* South Korea 99 157 280 furious pace, and law firms merge, expand, 35 Jingtian & Gongcheng China 85 96 279 and grow to keep up. 36 Deheng Law Firm China 37 181 277 37 DLA Piper UK/ U.S. 60 214 274 38 Jincheng Tongda & Neal China 99 217 271 39 Mayer Brown JSM U.S. 80 167 270 40 Guantao Law Firm China 65 140 268 ASIA 41 Deacons Hong Kong 51 135 268 42 WongPartnership Singapore 93 171 264 43 Beijing Grandway Law Offices China 46 214 260 Lee REUTERS/Jason 44 J Sagar Associates India 53 196 250 45 Hogan Lovells UK/ U.S. 44 204 244 46 AZB & Partners* India 19 221 240 47 Herbert Smith Freehills UK 45 192 237 48 Hylands Law Firm China 43 150 235 49 Drew & Napier Singapore 79 72 233 50 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer UK 31 N/A 233 *Information obtained from law firm website ^Total fee earners equals the universal subset of all time-keepers, including associates, partners, counsel, foreign counsel (including lawyers on secondment from alliance firms) and consultants. Trainees or pupils are not counted among fee-earners ASIAN LEGAL BUSINESS 18 ALB TOP 50 laRGEST laW FIRMS DECEMBER 2012 china- china headquartered intl Total Fee- Total Rank Firm Partners Associates FEE- earners^ Rank Firm Headquarters Partners Associates earn- 1 Dacheng Law 749 1428 2676 ERS^ Offices 1 Baker & U.S. 20 74 94 2 Beijing Yingke 567 1053 1820 McKenzie Law Firm 2 Hogan UK/U.S. 11 69 80 3 Grandall Law 215 580 1112 Lovells Firm 3 Linklaters UK 10 56 72 4 DeHeng Law 187 763 1106 Offices 4 O'Melveny UK 8 39 70 & Myers 5 King & Wood 192 826 1018 Mallesons 5 DLA Piper UK/U.S. 11 57 68 6 Zhong Yin Law 117 584 960 6 Clifford UK 9 46 66 Firm Chance* 7 AllBright Law 184 671 940 7 Freshfields UK 6 N/A 60 Offices Bruckhaus Deringer 8 Zhong Lun Law 203 560 747 Firm 8 Pinsent UK 8 18 46 Masons 9 Jun He Law 149 299 482 Offices 9 Herbert UK 7 38 45 Smith 10 Guanghe Law 112 348 455 Freehills Firm 10 Allen & UK 9 22 39 11 Zhonglun W&D 98 320 418 Overy* Law Firm 11 Mayer U.S. 8 26 37 12 Guangdong Sun 35 234 350 Brown Law Firm JSM 13 Zhongcheng 78 275 307 12 Orrick, U.S. 5 16 37 Renhe Law Firm Herrington & Sutcliffe 14 Jingtian & 85 96 279 Gongcheng 13 Sidley U.S. 5 16 32 Austin 15 Deheng Law 37 181 277 Firm 14 Shearman U.S. 4 26 30 & Sterling 16 Jincheng 99 217 271 Tongda & Neal 15 Norton UK 11 15 26 Rose 17 Guantao Law 65 140 268 Lee REUTERS/Jason Firm *Information obtained from law firm website 18 Beijing 46 214 260 ^Total fee earners equals the universal subset of all time-keepers, including associates, partners, Grandway Law counsel, foreign counsel (including lawyers on secondment from alliance firms) and consultants.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Private Sector Positions
    PRIVATE SECTOR POSITIONS This document reflects private sector placements held by UCI Law graduates during their first year of practice, as well as summer placements following students’ first and second years of law school coursework. AM LAW 200 FIRMS Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP (#161) Orange County, CA; San Diego, CA Alston & Bird LLP (#48) Los Angeles, CA Ballard Spahr LLP (#99) Los Angeles, CA Brown Rudnick LLP (#148) Boston, MA; Irvine, CA Bryan Cave LLP (#57) Orange County, CA Cooley LLP (#30) Palo Alto, CA Crowell & Moring LLP (#75) Orange County, CA Davis Wright Tremaine LLP (#101) Los Angeles, CA Foley & Lardner LLP (#52) Boston, MA; Los Angeles, CA; San Francisco, CA Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen and Loewy, LLP (#64) Orange County, CA Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (#12) Orange County, CA Gordon & Rees LLP (#110) San Diego, CA Greenberg Traurig, LLP (#14) Orange County, CA Haynes and Boone, LLP (#90) Irvine, CA Hogan Lovells US LLP (#8) Los Angeles, CA Irell & Manella LLP (#153) Orange County, CA Jackson Lewis (#84) Newport Beach, CA Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP (#185) Orange County, CA Jones Day (#6) Washington, DC; Orange County, CA; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA K&L Gates LLP (#23) Orange County, CA; Los Angeles, CA Kirkland & Ellis LLP (#2) Los Angeles, CA; San Francisco, CA Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP (#133) Orange County, CA Latham & Watkins LLP (#1) Orange County, CA Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP (#73) Orange County, CA McDermott Will & Emery (#36) Hong Kong, China; Orange County, CA Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP (#106) Los Angeles, CA; Costa Mesa, CA Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP (#37) Los Angeles, CA Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (#9) Orange County, CA; Los Angeles, CA Morrison & Foerster LLP (#31) Los Angeles, CA; San Diego, CA Munger Tolles & Olsen LLP (#127) Los Angeles, CA Nixon Peabody LLP (#69) Washington, DC Norton Rose Fulbright LLP (#10) Los Angeles, CA; Orange County, CA O’Melveny & Myers LLP (#49) New York, NY; Newport Beach, CA Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Vincent Chang, Doris Ling-Cohan, Stewart D
    U.S.-Asia Lawyer Cooperation Forum was held in the downtown area on the 16th. From right: Vincent Chang, Doris Ling-Cohan, Stewart D. Aaron, Julie Guo, Linping Shen, Hua Dong (Photo/Reporter Fang Meng) U.S.-Asia Lawyer Cooperation Forum Held Reported by Fang Meng From New York As business exchanges between China and the United States becomes increasingly frequent, and following the trend of Chinese companies undertaking public listings and financing projects in the United States, the U.S.-Asia Lawyer Cooperation Forum was held at the New York County Lawyer’s Association in downtown Manhattan on the 16th, with members of the Chinese and American legal communities speaking, drawing a number of Chinese and American attorneys. New York County Lawyer’s Association President Stewart D. Aaron said, the business connections between China and the United States are growing ever closer, primarily embodied in certain Chinese companies with ongoing business activities in the United States. When the business volume reaches a certain level, [they] may choose to conduct legal proceedings in the US, and the legal affairs involved in cooperation between Chinese and U.S. corporations. He believes that differences in the legal systems, in translation, and in culture may sometimes lead to lengthened timeframes, which also requires greater understanding from both parties. New York State Supreme Court Judge Doris Ling-Cohan pointed out in her speech that, the most remarkable things about the US legal system are that the law guarantees the legal rights and interests of both parties regardless of their levels of wealth, that judges adjudicate cases independently, and that the trial format is primarily by independent juries.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors and Parties Involved in the [Redacted]
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM. The information contained in it is in draft form, incomplete and subject to change and must be read in conjunction with the section headed “Warning” on the cover of this document. DIRECTORS AND PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE [REDACTED] DIRECTORS Name Residential address Nationality Executive Directors Mr. CHAN Yuk Sing（陳玉成） 2/F, 251 Tseung Kwan O Village Chinese Hang Hau Sai Kung New Territories Hong Kong Mr. CHEUNG Shek On Block A8 Chinese （張錫安） 7 Silver Crest Road Fullway Garden Sai Kung New Territories Hong Kong Non-executive Director Mr. KUAN Hong Kin Daniel Flat A, 32/F, Block 10 Chinese （關匡建） Tai Hing Gardens Phase 2 No. 10 Ho Hing Circuit Tuen Mun, New Territories Hong Kong Independent non-executive Directors Mr. CHAN Ngai Sang Kenny House A1, Jade View Villa, Chinese （陳毅生） 20 Tsing Tai Road, Siu Lam, Tuen Mun, New Territories Hong Kong Mr. CHOW Chun To（鄒振濤） Flat C, 16/F Chinese Tower 3 213 Yee Kuk Street, Trinity Towers Sham Shui Po, Kowloon Hong Kong Mr. YAM Chiu Fan Joseph Flat RA, 48/F, Tower 2 British （任超凡） Le Prestige of Lohas Park #1 Lohas Park Road Tseung Kwan O Hong Kong For further information on the profile and background of our Directors, please refer to the section headed “Directors and Senior Management” in this document. –41– THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM. The information contained in it is in draft form, incomplete and subject to change and must be read in conjunction with the section headed “Warning” on the cover of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Patent & Trademark Update
    TMI Associates Issue9 (March 2018) Japan Patent & Please note that there is one exception to this rule in a Invalidation rate of JPO patent invalidation trials FRAND case. We will discuss this exception – i.e. the “Abuse Trademark Update of Rights” theory - in a future issue of our newsletter. (2) Second reason : High patentee success rate The actual patentee success rate in patent infringement litigation in Japan is 43%, a similar rate to that seen in Delaware in 2016. This rate is calculated based on the number of lawsuits concluded from 2014 to 2016. The graph below shows the details of the judgments and settlements at the district court level. When discussing the patentee success rate, settlements should be considered because a significant number of cases (34%) reach settlement in Japan, as you can see in the graph below. Contents Specifically, while the invalidation rate at the JPO was as high should also be considered as an additional or an alternate Details of judgments and settlements as 70% over 10 years ago, it has continued to decrease and venue for patent disputes due to three not widely known 1. Patent Lawsuits in Japan has remained relatively stable at around 20 to 30% in the past reasons: (1) automatic injunctions, (2) reasonably high patentee – What You Need to Know several years. The stability of patent rights as you see above is success rate, and (3) reasonably low invalidation rate. In this to Resolve Cross–Border Patent Disputes an important factor when considering a venue for patent article, we would like to explain these three reasons in depth infringement litigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Für Fortgeschrittene Studenten*, Referendare* Und Rechtsanwälte*
    Workshop für fortgeschrittene Studenten*, Referendare* und Rechtsanwälte* Nehmen Sie an unserem interaktiven Workshop teil und erleben Sie, dass sich Großkanzlei und angenehme, lockere Arbeits- Teilnehmerstimmen zu atmosphäre nicht ausschließen! Lernen Sie die interessanten unseren bisherigen Aufgaben und Herausforderungen eines Wirtschaftsanwalts Workshops kennen und sprechen Sie mit Berufseinsteigern sowie erfahrenen Anwälten. „klare Darstellung und Einführung in bisher Wo und wann? unbekannte Bereiche“ Simmons & Simmons, Düsseldorf, Mittwoch, 7. November 2018, 11.00-18.00 Uhr mit anschließendem Abendprogramm „viel Interesse an den Bewerbern selbst“ Unsere Themen: • Verhandlungstraining durch einen Profi mit anschließender „gute Einbindung der Simulation Teilnehmer“ • Erwerb eines IT-Unternehmens aus gesellschaftsrechtlicher, arbeits- und IP-rechtlicher Sicht „die Fragen an das Publikum • Karriere-Speed Dating: Anwälte und Anwältinnen verschiedener und die Gelegenheit zu Senioritätsstufen stehen Ihnen für Ihre Karrierefragen zur Rückfragen waren sehr gut“ Verfügung „die Referenten haben Wenn Sie überdurchschnittliche Rechts- und Englischkenntnisse sowie Interesse für wirtschaftliche Zusammenhänge mitbringen, dann Interesse an den jeweiligen bewerben Sie sich bei uns. Gebieten wecken können“ Wir freuen uns auf Sie! „alle waren sehr offen“ Nähere Informationen finden Sie auf „schöne Kombination aus simmons-simmons.de/workshops Lernen und Anwenden neuer Materie“ Sollten Sie Fragen haben, stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung. Manuela Gillich
    [Show full text]
  • SCDRF Shanghai Invitation En16march15
    Swiss-Chinese Dispute Resolution Forum What the China-Switzerland Free Trade Agreement and Switzerland’s Arbitration Hub can offer to Chinese Companies 12 – 13 May 2015 Sofitel Shanghai Hyland Hotel 505 Nanjing Road East 200001 Shanghai Schedule at a glance Day One: Public Seminar: 12 May 2015 Day Two: Workshops for Practitioners: 13 May 2015 Conference topic Commerce between China and Switzerland is at an all-time high and is only set to continue its increase, especially in light of the Free Trade Agreement that came into force last year. Switzerland represents a unique opportunity for outbound Chinese investment, not only as its own market but as a gateway to Europe. Its centrally located, stable and reliable economy is linked to the neighbouring European Union through a network of bilateral agreements. Moreover, the Swiss legal system and its long- standing traditions of neutrality and dispute resolution make it the ideal choice as a seat of arbitration for agreements between Chinese and European (or other) parties. The Swiss judicial environment is arbitration-friendly and efficient. Like China, Switzerland has a civil law tradition, making Swiss law particularly well-suited to contracts involving Chinese parties. Switzerland is also home to a number of established and internationally renown arbitration institutions, including the Swiss Chambers’ International Arbitration Institution, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center, the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Resolution Panel, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Workshop Objective and methodology On the occasion of the Swiss-Chinese Dispute Resolution Forum, Swiss arbitration experts will be available for a day to share practical know-how on key aspects of international arbitration proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Patent & Trademark Update
    TMI Associates Issue7 (July 2017) Japan Patent & The reason for this misconception could be that some in the below graph, in 70% of patent infringement lawsuits First, as shown in the below graph, the number of patent In sum, the decrease in the total number of patent applications by 2007; however, the Defendant continued using the articles discuss statistics regarding Japanese patent the judges did not make any decisions on the validity of the applications filed from the other IP5 countries does not show seems to have mostly come from the change in patent filing trademark “Eemax”. The Plaintiff sued the Defendant for Unfair Trademark Update lawsuits based only on those cases which have reached a patents. Further, in 43% of patent infringement lawsuits, such a decrease. Rather, the number of patent applications filed policy, i.e., shifting the focus from quantity to quality Competition asserting that the Defendant’s use of “Eemax” was judgment. The information on settled cases, as shown in even though the plaintiffs made invalidation arguments, the by U.S. entities has actually been increasing since 2013. of patents, and not as a result of any decrease in the impermissible given that it is a well-known trademark of the the above graph, was not announced before, and such judges still did not make any decisions with respect to validity. importance of obtaining patent protection in Japan. Plaintiff, even if the Plaintiff had not registered the mark. In success rate could previously only be examined based on In other words, it is inappropriate to derive any significant Number of patent applications filed by foreign entities response, the Defendant filed a counterclaim asserting that the cases in which judgments were rendered.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors and Parties Involved in the [Redacted]
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM, INCOMPLETE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND THAT THE INFORMATION MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SECTION HEADED “WARNING” ON THE COVER OF THIS DOCUMENT. DIRECTORS AND PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE [REDACTED] DIRECTORS Name Address Nationality Executive Directors Dr. Bo CHEN Room 1005, Block B3 American Dayuan International Center No. 88 Tianfu 3rd Street Chengdu Sichuan Province PRC Dr. Changyu WANG 7 Mountain Mistral Place American The Woodlands Texas TX 77382-1800 United States of America Dr. Gang XU Room 1203, Unit 1 Chinese Building 10, Tianfu Family Home No. 1000 Jincheng Avenue High-tech Zone, Chengdu Sichuan Province PRC Non-executive Directors Mr. Qi CHEN Room 904, Unit 2 Chinese Block 2 No. 688, Dongpo North 2nd Road Qingyang District, Chengdu Sichuan Province PRC Dr. Dong LYU 201, Gate 1, Building 14 Chinese Yutaoyuan District 1, Xicheng District Beijing PRC – 144 – THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM, INCOMPLETE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND THAT THE INFORMATION MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SECTION HEADED “WARNING” ON THE COVER OF THIS DOCUMENT. DIRECTORS AND PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE [REDACTED] Name Address Nationality Dr. Min Chuan WANG Room A, 8th Floor Chinese Tower 10, Park Avenue 18 Hoi Ting Road Mong Kok, Kowloon Hong Kong Mr. Yilun LIU Flat F 18/F Chinese Block 5 The Lustre Hong Kong Chianti, Phase 13 Discovery Bay, Lantau New Territories Hong Kong Independent Non-executive Directors Prof. Xiao-Fan WANG 3619 Dover Road American Durham North Carolina NC27707 United States of America Prof. Yang KE No. 52 Unit 4 1801 Chinese Fucheng Road A Haidian District Beijing PRC Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia's Top 50 Largest Law Firms
    ASIA’S TOP 50 LARGEST LAW FIRMS RESILIENCE IN A PANDEMIC YEAR PLUS CHARTING INDONESIA’S FINTECH GROWTH WE HEAR FROM SINGAPORE LAW FIRM LEADERS MCI (P) 041/02/2020 OFFSHORE LAW FIRMS ISSN 0219 – 6875 KDN PPS 1867/10/2015(025605) LOOK AHEAD TO 2021 ÷�≤√‘±�·“≥”￠��∞�.pdf 1 2020/8/13 上午9:30 培育商事仲裁法律后备人才 托起未来商事仲裁法律之星 18th CIETAC CUP INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT COMPETITION Invitation of Judges for the CIETAC Cup Dear Friends and Colleagues in Arbitration, We are pleased to invite you to act as an arbitrator in the 18th CIETAC Cup International Commercial Arbitration Moot Com- petition (“CIETAC Cup”). This year, the oral hearings will be conducted online during 15th-20th November, 2020. CIETAC Cup is organized by China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (“CIETAC”), receiving support from Vis Moot, the ICC, the HKIAC and SIAC. Since 2000, CIETAC Cup has been successfully held 17 C M times. Last year, the 17th CIETAC Cup attracted more than 700 contestants from over 60 prestigious law schools in Y Mainland China, and over 150 arbitrators, lawyers and experts from over 10 countries and regions to seat as judges. CM The CIETAC CUP aims at fostering the study of international commercial arbitration and training future leaders in the MY CY area of alternative dispute resolution by introducing international moot court, improving students’ legal accomplish- CMY ment, publicizing international arbitration and promoting cooperation and exchanges between domestic and foreign K arbitration communities. The CIETAC Cup is the first official Pre-Moot of the Willem C. Vis Commercial Arbitration Moot Court, using the same set of case and arbitration rules.
    [Show full text]
  • ANJIE Law FIRM
    E: [email protected] T: +44 (0)20 7396 9292 F: +44 (0)20 7396 9300 @TheLegal500 ASIA PACIFIC The Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2019 The clients’ guide to law firms ANJIE LAW FIRM • Antitrust/competition • Banking and finance 19F, TOWER D1, LIANGMAQIAO DIPLOMATIC BUILDING, • Dispute resolution No.19 DONGFANGDONGLU, • Corporate and M&A CHAOYANG DISTRICT, BEIJING 100600, CHINA • Intellectual property • Labour and employment Tel: +86 10 8567 5988 Fax: +86 10 8567 5999 • TMT legal500.com E: [email protected] T: +44 (0)20 7396 9292 F: +44 (0)20 7396 9300 @TheLegal500 ANJIE LAW FIRM 19F, TOWER D1, LIANGMAQIAO DIPLOMATIC BUILDING, NO.19 DONGFANGDONGLU, CHAOYANG DISTRICT, BEIJING 100600, CHINA T: +86 10 8567 5988 F: +86 10 8567 5999 THE FIRM AnJie Law Firm is an elite PRC law firm providing full services to both international and domestic clients including Fortune 500 companies, large state-owned enterprises, financial institutions, as well as leading private companies. Since its establishment, AnJie has been growing rapidly and soundly with currently more than 300 professionals. AnJie’s lawyers are well- regarded experts in their professional fields. Based on their deep understanding of the regulatory landscape and strong practical experience, they have handled numerous high-stakes cases in Chinese court. AnJie lawyers are often consulted by regulators on leading legal and policy issues, and have built strong work relationships with government agencies and industry regulatory bodies. All partners at AnJie Law Firm have worked in leading international and domestic law firms, and many are qualified to practice both in China and abroad. AnJie lawyers frequently speak at major international legal and business conferences and actively contribute to well-known legal and academic journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyo, Japan TMI ASSOCIATES Roppongi Hills Mori Tower Tokyo
    III NextGen Leadership Program and Class V Induction June 5, 2016: Tokyo, Japan TMI ASSOCIATES Roppongi Hills Mori Tower Tokyo Courtesy of III Member Mitsue Aizawa CONFERENCE FACULTY CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Mitsue Aizawa E. Bruce Leonard TMI Associates, Tokyo Miller Thomson LLP, Toronto Donald S. Bernstein Maurice Fleming Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York NextGen Nomination Director Miller Thomson LLP, Toronto Alan Bloom Ernst & Young, London Franca Tibando NextGen Executive Director Prof. Hon. Samuel L. Bufford Miller Thomson LLP, Toronto Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA Shinchiro Abe Kasumigaseki International Law Office Thomas M. Gaa NextGen Tokyo Organizing Committee Bialson, Bergen & Schwab, Palo Alto Prof. Christoph Paulus Humboldt University, Berlin Hon. James M. Peck Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York Nominated Delegates Class V Ethan J. Birnberg Erin Broderick Lindquist & Vennum LLP Baker & McKenzie LLP 600 17th Street, Suite 1800 South 300 East Randolph Street, Suite 5000 Denver, CO 80202 USA Chicago, Illinois 60601 USA Tel: 303.454.0534 Tel: 312.861.8935 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Nominator Nominator Hon. Sidney B. Brooks Eberhard Nietzer United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Colorado Amtsgericht Heilbronn Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Margie Chan Dr. Jason Corbett Davis Polk & Wardwell Silk Legal Co., Ltd. Hong Kong Solicitors RSU Tower, 8th Floor, Suite 805 The Hong Kong Club Building 571 Sukhumvit Road, North Klongton 3A Chater Road, 18/F Hong Kong Watthana, Bangkok, Thailand 10110 Tel: +852 2533 3325 Tel: +66 (0)2107-2007 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Nominator Nominator Donald S.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors and Parties Involved in the [Redacted]
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM, INCOMPLETE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND THAT THE INFORMATION MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SECTION HEADED ‘‘WARNING’’ ON THE COVER OF THIS DOCUMENT. DIRECTORS AND PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE [REDACTED] DIRECTORS Name Address Nationality Executive Directors Mr.ZengMing(曾明) Room 1003, Unit 2 St. Kitts and Nevis Building B, Lian Chuang Garden No. 28 Zhangjiang North Road Zhanggong District Ganzhou Jiangxi Province PRC Ms. Zeng Minglan (曾明蘭) Daluo Residential District Chinese Jintang Development Zone Longnan County Ganzhou Jiangxi Province PRC Mr. Wu Runlu (吳潤陸) Daluo Industrial Park Chinese Longnan County Jiangxi Province PRC Mr. Su Xinlin (蘇鑫林)Room1203 Australian No. 7 Gaolin Xili Huli District Xiamen Fujian Province PRC Independent non-executive Directors Mr.SuenToWai(孫多偉) Flat 7, 24th Floor, Block C Chinese Causeway Centre 28 Harbour Road Wan Chai Hong Kong –67– THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM, INCOMPLETE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND THAT THE INFORMATION MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SECTION HEADED ‘‘WARNING’’ ON THE COVER OF THIS DOCUMENT. DIRECTORS AND PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE [REDACTED] Mr. Lau Jing Yeung William Flat F, 18th Floor, Block 6 Australian (劉正揚) The Pacifica 9 Sham Shing Road Lai Chi Kok Kowloon Hong Kong Mr. Gao Jianhua (高建華) Room 101, Unit 1, Tower 34 Singaporean Block 1, Jingda Road Beidian West Village Chaoyang District Beijing PRC For further information regarding our Directors, please refer to the section headed ‘‘Directors and Senior Management’’. PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE [REDACTED]
    [Show full text]