DOCSLIB.ORG

SCDRF Shanghai Invitation En16march15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SCDRF Shanghai Invitation En16march15 Swiss-Chinese Dispute Resolution Forum What the China-Switzerland Free Trade Agreement and Switzerland’s Arbitration Hub can offer to Chinese Companies 12 – 13 May 2015 Sofitel Shanghai Hyland Hotel 505 Nanjing Road East 200001 Shanghai Schedule at a glance Day One: Public Seminar: 12 May 2015 Day Two: Workshops for Practitioners: 13 May 2015 Conference topic Commerce between China and Switzerland is at an all-time high and is only set to continue its increase, especially in light of the Free Trade Agreement that came into force last year. Switzerland represents a unique opportunity for outbound Chinese investment, not only as its own market but as a gateway to Europe. Its centrally located, stable and reliable economy is linked to the neighbouring European Union through a network of bilateral agreements. Moreover, the Swiss legal system and its long- standing traditions of neutrality and dispute resolution make it the ideal choice as a seat of arbitration for agreements between Chinese and European (or other) parties. The Swiss judicial environment is arbitration-friendly and efficient. Like China, Switzerland has a civil law tradition, making Swiss law particularly well-suited to contracts involving Chinese parties. Switzerland is also home to a number of established and internationally renown arbitration institutions, including the Swiss Chambers’ International Arbitration Institution, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center, the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Resolution Panel, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Workshop Objective and methodology On the occasion of the Swiss-Chinese Dispute Resolution Forum, Swiss arbitration experts will be available for a day to share practical know-how on key aspects of international arbitration proceedings. This will be done through the use of a mock case, using realistic fact patterns to illustrate how arbitration proceedings would be managed under the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration, and under the ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) Rules of Arbitration. Public Seminar Programme for Day One 9:00 – WELCOME ADDRESS AND INTRODUCTION Bernhard F. Meyer 9:45 TO THE CONFERENCE TOPIC Vice President, ASA – Swiss Arbitration Association Alexander Hoffet Consul General of Switzerland Chinese Government Official [Name TBD] Jiangrong Yang Chairman, SHIAC 9:45 – THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT: HOW IT PwC on behalf of 10:45 WORKS; SWITZERLAND AS THE GATEWAY Switzerland Global TO EUROPE FOR CHINESE BUSINESS Enterprise [Names TBD] Discussion (panel and floor) 10:45 – COFFEE BREAK 11:15 11:15 – SWITZERLAND: A GLOBAL DISPUTE Session Chair: 12:30 RESOLUTION FORUM, PART I Marc Veit, LALIVE, Geneva The Swiss tradition of dispute resolution Heidi Tagliavini or Blaise Godet The Swiss Chambers’ International Arbitration Institution Philipp Habegger President, Arbitration Court Swiss Chambers’ International Arbitration Institution The ICC International Court of Urs Weber-Stecher Arbitration President, Swiss Arbitration Discussion (panel and floor) Commission, ICC Switzerland 12.45 – NETWORKING LUNCH 14:00 13:30 – SWITZERLAND: A GLOBAL DISPUTE Session Chair: 14:15 RESOLUTION FORUM, PART II Cesare Jermini, Bär & Karrer, Lugano The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Ignacio de Castro Mediation Center Deputy Director, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Jan-Michael Ahrens Head of Litigation Infrastructure and Cities Siemens AG The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) Liu Chi CAS Arbitrator Dacheng Law Offices, Beijing Discussion (panel and floor) 14:15 – SWISS LAW AND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS Session Chair: 15:30 Philippe Bärtsch Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd Frank Spoorenberg, Tavernier Tschanz, Geneva Paul Thaler, Wenfei Discussion (panel and floor) Attorneys-at-law Ltd., Zurich / Beijing / Shanghai 15:30 – COFFEE BREAK 16:00 16:00 – CHOICES OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION Session Chair: 17:00 Arbitration, Mediation, Dispute Boards, Dieter Hofmann (or other ADR. What do the institutions offer? WW), Walder Wyss, Zurich Philipp Habegger President, Arbitration Court Swiss Chambers’ International Arbitration Institution Jiangrong Yang Chairman, SHIAC Urs Weber-Stecher President, Swiss Arbitration Commission, ICC Switzerland Ignacio de Castro Deputy Director, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center CIETAC 17:00 – CONCLUSIONS Alexander McLin. Executive 17:15 Director, ASA – Swiss Arbitration Association CODA Representative 17:15 – NETWORKING COCKTAIL 19:00 Who is Professionals involved in dispute resolution: corporate counsel, attending? lawyers, arbitrators, and academics. Chinese companies with investments abroad; lawyers from law firms practicing international dispute resolution and/or outbound investment; Chinese chambers of commerce, export agencies, arbitration institutions. Sponsorship The conference provides a meaningful opportunity to gain opportunities visibility and build partnerships within the global arbitration business network. For further information, please contact Michael Jin at [email protected]. CPD/CLE Participants will receive an official certificate of attendance from Credits ASA – the Swiss Arbitration Association. Workshop Format and Topics for Day Two Four workshops of 90 minutes each will be held in parallel throughout the day, such that by the end of the day, participants will have taken part in each workshop. Each workshop itself will be divided into workgroups of 4-5 people each. The topics are listed below. Participants will have the opportunity to work through problems in groups and present results at the end of each 90-minute session. Instruction will be in English, with Chinese- speaking discussion leaders present in each workshop. 9:00am – PLENARY SESSION: 9:30am Introduction into the Mock Case Room A Room B Room C Room D Workshop 1: Workshop 2 Workshop 3 Workshop 4 Launching Provisional Organize cost- Managing the Arbitration Measures efficient and speedy hearing proceedings 9:30-11:00 Group A Group B Group C Group D 11:00-11:15 Coffee Break 11:15-12:45 Group B Group C Group D Group A 12:45-14:00 Lunch 14:00-15:30 Group C Group D Group A Group B 15:30-16:00 Coffee Break 16:00-17:30 Group D Group A Group B Group C 18:00-20:00 Networking Workshop Instructors: • Philippe Bärtsch, Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd (Workshop 3) • Laurence Burger, Landolt & Koch, (Workshop 2) • Felix Dasser, Homburger, Zurich (Workshop 3) • Philipp Habegger, LALIVE, Zurich (Workshop 2) • Dieter Hofmann (or other Walder Wyss), Zurich (Workshop 3) • Cesare Jermini, Bär & Karrer, Lugano (Workshop 2) • LIU Chi, Dacheng Law Offices, Beijing (Workshop 4) • Bernhard Meyer, MME Partners, Zurich (Workshop 4) • Hansjörg Stutzer, THOUVENIN, Zurich, (Workshop 1) • Paul Thaler, Wenfei, Zurich / Beijing / Shanghai (Workshop 2) • Marc Veit, LALIVE, Geneva (Workshop 1) • Urs Weber-Stecher, Wenger Vieli, Zurich (Workshop 4) • Martin Wiebecke, Wiebecke, (Workshop 3) • Dominique Dreyer, Fribourg, (Workshop 1) • Urs Zenhäusern, Baker & McKenzie, Zurich, (Workshop 1) About the organisers The Swiss Arbitration Association (ASA) has over 1200 ASA – Swiss members, practitioners and academics engaged and/or Arbitration interested in domestic and international arbitration, from Switzerland and abroad. ASA contributes to the development Association of arbitration law and practice through regular conferences and workshops, including this Annual Conference; the Arbitration Workshop Seminar; ASA Local Group meetings; ASA below 40 events for young practitioners, and the publication of the ASA Bulletin, a renowned arbitration quarterly, and of the ASA Special Series. For more information and membership enquiries, see www.arbitration-ch.org, or contact Alexander McLin, Executive Director, at [email protected]. Approved by Shanghai Municipal People's Government in 1988, Shanghai International Economy and Trade Arbitration Commission (also known as the Shanghai International Arbitration Center; previously known as the China International SHIAC – Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Shanghai Shanghai Commission, hereinafter referred to as “SHIAC”) was International established through a formal procedure and legitimately Arbitration registered, and has been acting as an independent arbitration Center institute all along. SHIAC is located in Shanghai, which is a crucial city in chinese economic market. SHIAC has successfully carried out independent, impartial, effective and professional arbitration services for the dispute resolution which have been positively commented at home and abroad. China Overseas Development Association (CODA, also known as China Industrial Overseas Development & Planning Association) is a national non-profit social organization with CODA – China corporate capacity duly approved by and registered with the Overseas Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Development CODA was established on 10 December 2004. CODA’s Association Honorary Chairman is Zeng Peiyan, former Vice-Premier of the State Council, and its President is Zhang Guobao, former Vice-Chairman of the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and former Director (at ministerial level) of the National Energy Administration. Conference Alexander McLin, ASA – Swiss Arbitration Association, Geneva / Zurich Organisation Bernhard F. Meyer, MME Partners, Zurich Clarisse von Wunscheim, Hartmann Dreyer, Fribourg Wang Weijun, Deputy Secretary General, SHIAC Wang Kewen, Director, CODA Practical information Registration Please complete the attached registration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Private Sector Positions
    PRIVATE SECTOR POSITIONS This document reflects private sector placements held by UCI Law graduates during their first year of practice, as well as summer placements following students’ first and second years of law school coursework. AM LAW 200 FIRMS Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP (#161) Orange County, CA; San Diego, CA Alston & Bird LLP (#48) Los Angeles, CA Ballard Spahr LLP (#99) Los Angeles, CA Brown Rudnick LLP (#148) Boston, MA; Irvine, CA Bryan Cave LLP (#57) Orange County, CA Cooley LLP (#30) Palo Alto, CA Crowell & Moring LLP (#75) Orange County, CA Davis Wright Tremaine LLP (#101) Los Angeles, CA Foley & Lardner LLP (#52) Boston, MA; Los Angeles, CA; San Francisco, CA Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen and Loewy, LLP (#64) Orange County, CA Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (#12) Orange County, CA Gordon & Rees LLP (#110) San Diego, CA Greenberg Traurig, LLP (#14) Orange County, CA Haynes and Boone, LLP (#90) Irvine, CA Hogan Lovells US LLP (#8) Los Angeles, CA Irell & Manella LLP (#153) Orange County, CA Jackson Lewis (#84) Newport Beach, CA Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP (#185) Orange County, CA Jones Day (#6) Washington, DC; Orange County, CA; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA K&L Gates LLP (#23) Orange County, CA; Los Angeles, CA Kirkland & Ellis LLP (#2) Los Angeles, CA; San Francisco, CA Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP (#133) Orange County, CA Latham & Watkins LLP (#1) Orange County, CA Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP (#73) Orange County, CA McDermott Will & Emery (#36) Hong Kong, China; Orange County, CA Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP (#106) Los Angeles, CA; Costa Mesa, CA Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP (#37) Los Angeles, CA Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (#9) Orange County, CA; Los Angeles, CA Morrison & Foerster LLP (#31) Los Angeles, CA; San Diego, CA Munger Tolles & Olsen LLP (#127) Los Angeles, CA Nixon Peabody LLP (#69) Washington, DC Norton Rose Fulbright LLP (#10) Los Angeles, CA; Orange County, CA O’Melveny & Myers LLP (#49) New York, NY; Newport Beach, CA Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Vincent Chang, Doris Ling-Cohan, Stewart D
    U.S.-Asia Lawyer Cooperation Forum was held in the downtown area on the 16th. From right: Vincent Chang, Doris Ling-Cohan, Stewart D. Aaron, Julie Guo, Linping Shen, Hua Dong (Photo/Reporter Fang Meng) U.S.-Asia Lawyer Cooperation Forum Held Reported by Fang Meng From New York As business exchanges between China and the United States becomes increasingly frequent, and following the trend of Chinese companies undertaking public listings and financing projects in the United States, the U.S.-Asia Lawyer Cooperation Forum was held at the New York County Lawyer’s Association in downtown Manhattan on the 16th, with members of the Chinese and American legal communities speaking, drawing a number of Chinese and American attorneys. New York County Lawyer’s Association President Stewart D. Aaron said, the business connections between China and the United States are growing ever closer, primarily embodied in certain Chinese companies with ongoing business activities in the United States. When the business volume reaches a certain level, [they] may choose to conduct legal proceedings in the US, and the legal affairs involved in cooperation between Chinese and U.S. corporations. He believes that differences in the legal systems, in translation, and in culture may sometimes lead to lengthened timeframes, which also requires greater understanding from both parties. New York State Supreme Court Judge Doris Ling-Cohan pointed out in her speech that, the most remarkable things about the US legal system are that the law guarantees the legal rights and interests of both parties regardless of their levels of wealth, that judges adjudicate cases independently, and that the trial format is primarily by independent juries.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors and Parties Involved in the [Redacted]
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM. The information contained in it is in draft form, incomplete and subject to change and must be read in conjunction with the section headed “Warning” on the cover of this document. DIRECTORS AND PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE [REDACTED] DIRECTORS Name Residential address Nationality Executive Directors Mr. CHAN Yuk Sing（陳玉成） 2/F, 251 Tseung Kwan O Village Chinese Hang Hau Sai Kung New Territories Hong Kong Mr. CHEUNG Shek On Block A8 Chinese （張錫安） 7 Silver Crest Road Fullway Garden Sai Kung New Territories Hong Kong Non-executive Director Mr. KUAN Hong Kin Daniel Flat A, 32/F, Block 10 Chinese （關匡建） Tai Hing Gardens Phase 2 No. 10 Ho Hing Circuit Tuen Mun, New Territories Hong Kong Independent non-executive Directors Mr. CHAN Ngai Sang Kenny House A1, Jade View Villa, Chinese （陳毅生） 20 Tsing Tai Road, Siu Lam, Tuen Mun, New Territories Hong Kong Mr. CHOW Chun To（鄒振濤） Flat C, 16/F Chinese Tower 3 213 Yee Kuk Street, Trinity Towers Sham Shui Po, Kowloon Hong Kong Mr. YAM Chiu Fan Joseph Flat RA, 48/F, Tower 2 British （任超凡） Le Prestige of Lohas Park #1 Lohas Park Road Tseung Kwan O Hong Kong For further information on the profile and background of our Directors, please refer to the section headed “Directors and Senior Management” in this document. –41– THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM. The information contained in it is in draft form, incomplete and subject to change and must be read in conjunction with the section headed “Warning” on the cover of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Notaries and Lawyers in the Jurisdiction of Beijing
    List of notaries and lawyers in the jurisdiction of Beijing Notary in Beijing 1. 北京市方圆公证处 Beijing Fangyuan Notary Public Office 地址：北京市东城区东水井胡同 5 号北京 INN 大厦 1 层、3/5 层（东二环朝阳门立交桥西 南角） 邮编：100010 Address: First floor and 3/5 floor, Beijing Inn, No. 5 Dongshuijing Hutong, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100010 Tel: +86 10 85197666 Website: http://www.bnpo.gov.cn/ 2. 北京市长安公证处 Changan Notary Office 地址：北京市东城区朝阳门北大街 6 号首创大厦 715 房间, 100027 Address: Room 715 Shouchuang Building, No. 6 Chaoyangmen Beidajie, 100027 Tel: 010-65543888, http://www.gongzheng.gov.cn/ 3. 北京市中信公证处 Beijing Zhongxin Notary Public Office 地址：北京市西城区金融街广宁伯路 2 号金泽大厦（铁通大厦）五层邮编：100032 Address: 5th Floor, Jinze Building, No. 2 Guang Ning Bo lu, Jinrong Jie, Xicheng District, Beijing 100032 Tel: 010-52601155 http://www.bjgzc.com/ 4. 北京市求是公证处 Beijing Qiushi Notary Public Office 地址：北京市海淀区中关村南大街 24 号 Address: No. 24 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Haidian District, Beijing Tel: 62189143 http://bjqs.net 5. 丰台公证处 Fengtai Notary Public Office 地址：北京市丰台区北大街 9 号 Address: No. 9 Beijingdajie, Fengtai District, Beijing Tel: 010 6381 4355 6. 北京方正公证处 Beijing Fangzheng Notary Public Office 地址：北京市西城区西直门外大街 1 号西环广场塔 3 办公楼 12 层 11 层和 2 层 Address: 12th, 11th and 2nd, 3rd Building Xihuan Guangchang, No. 1 Xizhimen Wai Dajie Tel: 010-58073588 Lawyer Company Address Mr. HUANG Yonghua (Edward) Beijing King & Capital Law 23rd Floor, Tower C, Office 黄永华 Firm Park, No.5 Jinghua South Tel: 北京市京都律师事务所 Street, Chaoyang District, 0086-10-57096078 Beijing 0086-13601255277 (Mobile) 北京市朝阳区景华南街 5 号 E-mail: edwardhuang@king- 远洋光华国际 C 座 23 层 capital.com Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 'Dacheng' International Sports Law Conference
    2015 ‘Dacheng’ International Sports Law Conference We would like to invite you to attend 2015 ‘Dacheng’ International Sports Law Conference to be held from June 25-26, 2015, at the Regent Hotel, Beijing, China, co hosted by Dacheng Law Offices, Dentons, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) with support from China Football Association (“CFA”) and China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (“CIETAC”). Day One – June 25, 2015: International and Chinese Sports Law Topics Guest Speaker(s) The Role of Chinese Sports Lawyers Chi Liu (Dacheng Law Offices) Legal Aspects of Buying a European Richard Barham (Dentons) Professional Sports Team Financial Aspects of Buying a U.S. Richard Perna (Park Lane Sports Investment Bank, Professional Sports Team Managing Director) Due Diligence in Sports Industry Deals Richard Barham (Dentons) FIBA: Governance and Commercial Rights Benjamin Cohen (FIBA, Head of Governance and Protection in Basketball Legal Affairs) Investment Opportunities in Sports Industry Richard Barham (Dentons) and Risk Control Richard Perna (Park Lane) The Role of In-House Sports Lawyers Ella Wong (NBA China, Director of Legal Affairs) Legal Risk Control in Chinese Sports M&A Chi Liu (Dacheng Law Offices) Transactions Infront’s Legal Compliance Management Thomas Oehninger (Infront, General Counsel) System Moderator: Alex Haffner (Dentons) Panel: Shawn Sports Broadcasting Rights, New Media, and Yun (NBA China, Deputy Director of Legal Affairs), Digital Rights other lawyers from sports media companies Protection
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar on Going Private, Share Buyback and China Re-Listing
    W INTER 2 0 1 1 N EWSLETTER Seminar on Going Private, Share Buyback Going private is a complex process that involves and China Re-listing many business, legal and valuation issues. If not handled with care, it may invite litigations and On December 8, 2011, Goodwin Procter, Jun He SEC probes. Re-listing in China also involves Law Offices, CBLA and China General Cham- problems that require innovative business and ber of Commerce -USA co-hosted a seminar legal solutions. An expert panel consisting of on the topic of U.S.-listed Chinese companies senior investment bankers, lawyers and accoun- going private in the U.S. and seeking re-listing tants with deep and real case experience in this in China. In light of the challenges many U.S.- area discussed the topic with the audience. listed Chinese companies face under the current regulatory, accounting and capital markets environment in the United States, and the open- up of Chinese A-share stock markets to private- ly-owned growth companies, an increasing number of Chinese companies are considering a new option: going private in the U.S. and re- listing in China. Panel I, “Going Private and Delisting in the U.S.,” featured Christopher Croft (Manag- ing Director and Co-Head of Fairness Opinion Group at Houlihan Lokey), Stephen Davis (Partner at Goodwin Procter), Dennis Galgano (Vice Chairman, Head of International Invest- ment Banking at Morgan Joseph TriArtisan Left to right: Christopher Croft (Houlihan Lokey), LLC), and Anthony Tomaro (CPA Catherine Pan (Goodwin Procter), Dennis Galgano and Managing Director of Audit at UHY Advi- (Morgan Joseph TriArtisan), Stephen Davis (Good- sors NY, Inc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Law Firms for Help with Your Transactions, Hong Kong, Deacons Matters and Disputes Wherever They Arise
    INTERACTIVE EDITION In this issue ... The most responsive firms of Asia-MENA The Saudi cooperative insurance market – the Premier League of insurance? The New Indian Gazettal and what it will mean for China and Hong Kong Financial dispute resolution in Hong Kong: nothing to fear? MAGAZINE FOR THE IN-HOUSE COMMUNITY ALONG THE NEW SILK ROAD l Volume 10 Issue 6, 2012 www.inhousecommunity.com a trusted legal resource for global business challenges Premier Member Firms in the Throughout Asia and the Pacific and around the world, Asia/Pacific Region Lex Mundi member firms can help you meet the challenges of doing business globally. Australia, Clayton Utz Bangladesh, Amir & Amir Law Associates When business crosses borders, you need trusted legal advisors to navigate China, Jun He Law Offices you through the local legal and business landscape. You can confidently turn Guam, Blair Sterling Johnson & Martinez P.C. to Lex Mundi’s 160 premier member law firms for help with your transactions, Hong Kong, Deacons matters and disputes wherever they arise. Lex Mundi provides you access India, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff to internationally experienced and locally-connected business lawyers with & Co. the necessary market knowledge and expertise to help you succeed. Indonesia, Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro Japan, Nishimura & Asahi Korea, Hwang Mok Park, P.C. Malaysia, Skrine New Zealand, Simpson Grierson Pakistan, Rizvi, Isa, Afridi & Angell Philippines, Romulo Mabanta Buenaventura Sayoc & de los Angeles Locate a Lex Mundi member firm
    [Show full text]
  • Where Chinese Legal Eagles Dare to Soar
    Where Chinese legal eagles dare to soar Updated: 2012-03-16 07:30 By Ariel Tung (China aily) Yingke's Linda Yang and Mei Xiangrong cut the ribbon at the opening ceremony of its New York office last month. Provided to China Daily Common culture draws clients to law firms As Chinese investors expand their foothold in the United States, a number of law firms based in China are sprouting up in the US. Chinese direct investment in the US is more than doubling annually, says the Asia Society's Center on US- hina Relations and the )issinger Institute on hina and the United States. This creates a niche market for law firms based in hina that have branched out to the US in recent years. ,n -eb .3 Yingke Law -irm, based in 0ei1ing, officially opened an office in New York with a celebration at The Down Town Association, a prestigious social club located in Lower Manhattan. The New York office is managed by 2oe 3iao, a managing partner. 4More and more hinese companies are investing in the US,4 says Mei Xiangrong, Yingke's managing director. 4 hinese media are increasing their presence here5 hinese lawyers need to be here too.4 ,n the other hand, a homegrown New York law firm, Dai 6 Associates, doubled the number of its staff between .008 and .010 because of the steady flow of hinese investment into the US. -ounded in .00. by Dai Shang, a lawyer born in hina, the company's main goal is to serve the legal needs of companies based in hina expanding into the US.
    [Show full text]
  • 跨境贸易与投资 Cross-Border Trade and Investment 第 27 期 • Issue 27 2013 年 12 月 • December 2013
    www.dachenglaw.com 北京市东直门南大街 3 号国华投资大厦 5 层/12 层/15 层（100007） 5/F, 12/F, 15/F, Guohua Plaza, 3 Dongzhimennan Avenue, Beijing 100007, China Tel: +8610-58137799 Fax: +8610-58137788 中国法通讯 China Law Newsletter 跨境贸易与投资 Cross-border Trade and Investment 第 27 期 • Issue 27 2013 年 12 月 • December 2013 编者按：本刊旨在报道与中国有关的跨境贸易与投资的最新动态与我们的实务经验，但本刊不可 替代个案的正式法律意见。您若重复收到本刊或者要订阅、退订或进一步了解本刊的内容，请与大成 的有关律师联系。 Editor's note: the purpose of this publication is to report the most recent developments in the field of cross-border trade and investment in connection with China, as well as our practical experience therein. However, this publication should not be treated as a substitute for a formal legal opinion in individual cases. If you have received this publication more than once, or would like to subscribe or unsubscribe to this publication, or follow up on any issues raised in this publication, please be in contact with the lawyer you usually deal with at Dacheng Law Offices. 目录 CONTENTS 立法新闻 LEGISLATIVE NEWS [3] [1] 山东：鼓励外资举办营利性或非营利性医疗机构 Shandong Encourages Foreign Capital to Establish Profit-making and Non-profit Medical Institutions [2] 深圳市发展和改革委员会印发《深圳市产业结构调整优化和产业导向目录》 Shenzhen DRC Prints and Distributes Catalogue of Shenzhen City on the Industrial Structural Adjustment and Optimization and the Industrial Orientation [3] 上海自贸区外商独资医疗机构管理暂行办法出台 Shanghai Introduces Provisional Measures for the Administration of Wholly Foreign-owned Medical Institutions in FTZ 投资动态 INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENTS [3] 1 大成中国法通讯-跨境贸易与投资-第 27 期 Dacheng China Law Newsletter-Cross-border
    [Show full text]
  • China Law & Practice Awards 2013
    China Law & Practice CLP AWARDS SPONSORED BY: Awards 2013 SpecIAL FEATUre: CHINA LAW & PRACTICE AWARDS 2013 Deals of the Year Debt and Equity-linked WINNER Baidu SEC-registered bond Davis Polk & Wardwell (JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs) Jingtian & Gongcheng (JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs) Han Kun Law Offices (Baidu) Li & Partners (Baidu) Maples and Calder (Baidu) Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom (Baidu) In November 2012, Chinese web company Baidu became the first Chinese corporate in over a decade to issue US-registered securities off a well-known seasoned issuer shelf. In another first, this is the first time a US-registered bond was listed on the Singapore Exchange. The issue also marked the first L-R: Qin Zou of Davis Polk & Wardwell, Michael Gisser of Skadden Arps corporate offering Asia ex-Japan to be US Securities and Exchange Commission Slate Meagher & Flom, Simon He of Jingtian & Gongcheng (SEC) registered. The Republic of the Philippines, the Korea Finance Corpora- tion and the Export-Import Bank of Korea are the only other issuers in Asia that have printed SEC-compliant bonds. Furthermore, deal counsel had to manage FINALISTS concerns regarding Baidu’s variable interest entity (VIE) structure, which has an Gemdale high-yield bonds uncertain legal status in China. To mitigate risk, counsel included an innovative CNOOC’s $4 billion guaranteed notes offering repurchase upon change of control provision. CNPC $2 billion guaranteed senior bonds and $7 billion EMTN programme SOHO China $1 billion high-yield note offering Energy & Natural Resources WINNER Yancoal Australia’s A$8 billion acquisition of Gloucester Coal Baker & McKenzie (Yanzhou Coal) Dacheng Law Offices(Yancoal Australia) Herbert Smith Freehills (Yanzhou Coal, Yancoal Australia) King & Wood Mallesons (Yancoal Australia) Minter Ellison (Gloucester Coal) This acquisition created Australia’s largest independent coal producer by saleable production.
    [Show full text]
  • China and LA County, BYD Has Offices in Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Taiwan, and Other Regions
    GROWING TOGETHER China and Los Angeles County GROWING TOGETHER China and Los Angeles County PREPARED BY: Ferdinando Guerra, International Economist Principal Researcher and Author with special thanks to George Entis, Research Assistant June, 2014 Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation Kyser Center for Economic Research 444 S. Flower St., 37th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 622-4300 or (888) 4-LAEDC-1 Fax: (213)-622-7100 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.laedc.org The LAEDC, the region’s premier business leadership organization, is a private, non-profit 501(c)3 organization established in 1981. GROWING TOGETHER China and Los Angeles County As Southern California’s premier economic development organization, the mission of the LAEDC is to attract, retain, and grow businesses and jobs for the regions of Los Angeles County. Since 1996, the LAEDC has helped retain or attract more than 198,000 jobs, providing over $12 billion in direct economic impact from salaries and over $850 million in property and sales tax revenues to the County of Los Angeles. LAEDC is a private, non-profit 501(c)3 organization established in 1981. Regional Leadership The members of the LAEDC are civic leaders and ranking executives of the region’s leading public and private organizations. Through financial support and direct participation in the mission, programs, and public policy initiatives of the LAEDC, the members are committed to playing a decisive role in shaping the region’s economic future. Business Services The LAEDC’s Business Development and Assistance Program provides essential services to L.A. County businesses at no cost, including coordinating site searches, securing incentives and permits, and identifying traditional and nontraditional financing including industrial development bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • Business of Law: Local Knowledge Gives a Lead Over Foreign Rivals
    Business of law: Local knowledge gives a lead over foreign rivals June 10th 2015 Author: Lindsay Fortado If in the past decade the Asia-Pacific region was dominated by UK and US law firms seeking rapid expansion, the past year may have marked a turning point where locally grown companies have finally started to lead the charge in innovative growth. Asia-Pacific firms are creating networks and competing with the international players by being able to practise local law, offer lower rates and find new ways to raise funding. At the same time they are using global partnerships to their advantage. In the past year, Singapore-based ZICOlaw, whose network spans the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), created a legal structure that allowed it to publicly trade shares through a holding company; Rajah & Tann launched a large network in the Asia-Pacific region; and Singapore’s Stamford Law, one of the top mergers and acquisitions shops in the region, agreed to merge with global law firm Morgan, Lewis & Bockius. Meanwhile, some international firms are struggling in Asia. Fried Frank quit the region earlier this year, closing its Hong Kong and Shanghai offices. “A number of firms have been trying to develop an Asean-wide capability,” says Tony Williams, the founder of Jomati Consultants, which advises law firms on management and growth around the world. “The Rajah & Tanns, the ZICOs, they see a potential sweet spot there, that there’s no reason why they can’t dominate the market and work with some firms from around the world,” he says.
    [Show full text]