Conceptualizing the Consumer-Brand Relationship As a Truly Dyadic Process Jamye Foster Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conceptualizing the Consumer-Brand Relationship As a Truly Dyadic Process Jamye Foster Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Conceptualizing the consumer-brand relationship as a truly dyadic process Jamye Foster Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Marketing Commons Recommended Citation Foster, Jamye, "Conceptualizing the consumer-brand relationship as a truly dyadic process" (2010). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 782. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/782 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. CONCEPTUALIZING THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP AS A TRULY DYADIC PROCESS A Dissertation Submitted to Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in The Interdepartmental Program In Business Administration (Marketing) by Jamye Foster B.A., Mississippi State University, 1999 M.B.A., University of Southern Mississippi, 2001 May 2010 DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my husband and Memommie, for supporting me through the long and challenging process. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thank you to all my family, friends, and mentors for their help and support through this long process. Their kind words of encouragement were appreciated, and I couldn’t have done it without them. I can now “look up.” And to Georgia and David, a special thanks for letting me live with them in Baton Rouge for months on end! Thank you to my dissertation chairs, Dr. William Black and Dr. Judith Anne Garretson Folse, for all the time and effort they put into this project. I am especially appreciative for their willingness to work with me when I was living halfway around the world! Thank you to my dissertation committee members, Dr. Alvin Burns and Dr. Jason Hicks, for being generous with feedback, and so flexible with scheduling presentations! It was an especially long process, and it meant so much that they all stuck with me. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Daryl McKee. As the former chair of my dissertation committee, his feedback and encouragement are part of what saw me through to this point. Even though he wasn’t able to be with me here at the end, his presence is still evident in this work. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION........................................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT..........................................................................................................................................vii INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................1 ESSAY 1: CONCEPTUALIZING THE CONSUMER-BRAND RELATIONSHIP ...........................3 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................3 What is a Relationship? ........................................................................................................................4 Truly Dyadic Relationships...............................................................................................................7 Parasocial Relationships .................................................................................................................10 Relationship Outcomes ...................................................................................................................11 Is the Consumer-brand Relationship Really a Relationship?................................................................14 What is a Consumer-brand Relationship (CBR)? ................................................................................15 Current Conceptualization of the Consumer-brand Relationship .........................................................16 The Need to Consider a Truly Dyadic CBR ....................................................................................19 Examining the CBR as a Truly Dyadic Process...................................................................................21 The Creation of a Social Bond ........................................................................................................22 The Dyadic CBR Processes.............................................................................................................23 Summary ........................................................................................................................................33 Where Does Brand-loyalty Fit?...........................................................................................................34 Proposed Examination of the Truly Dyadic CBR Process ...................................................................36 Proposed Study 1 (Essay 2).............................................................................................................37 Proposed Study 2 (Essay 3).............................................................................................................38 Discussion and Conclusion .................................................................................................................39 Future Research..............................................................................................................................40 ESSAY 2: EXAMINING CONSUMER-BRAND INTERACTION: A FOCUS ON SOCIAL INTERACTION............................................................................................................................43 Introduction........................................................................................................................................43 The Literature.................................................................................................................................43 Appropriateness of the Qualitative Research Design.......................................................................43 Pretest: Exploratory Interviews.......................................................................................................44 Main Study: In-depth Interviews.....................................................................................................45 The Consumer-Brand Relationship .....................................................................................................45 Current Conceptualization ..............................................................................................................45 Examining the Truly Dyadic Consumer-brand Relationship............................................................46 What is Social Interaction Between Consumers and Brands? ..............................................................47 Background Theory ........................................................................................................................47 Summary ........................................................................................................................................53 Pretest: Exploratory Interviews...........................................................................................................54 Method ...........................................................................................................................................54 Results............................................................................................................................................59 Discussion ......................................................................................................................................65 Summary ........................................................................................................................................68 Main Study: In-depth Interviews.........................................................................................................68 iv Method ...........................................................................................................................................69 Results and Discussion ...................................................................................................................73 Summary ........................................................................................................................................88 General Discussion.............................................................................................................................88 Theoretical Implications .................................................................................................................89 Managerial Implications .................................................................................................................89 Study Limitations ...........................................................................................................................90 Future Research and Conclusion .....................................................................................................91 ESSAY
Recommended publications
  • Brand Loyalty Reloaded
    RED P APER BR AND LOYALT Y RELOADED 2015 KEVIN ROBERTS EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN ABSTRACT This is a “red” rather than “white” paper because Saatchi & Saatchi operates from the edges, zigs when others zag. Red is the color of passion, hope and optimism. Red is the color of spirit, the root word of inspiration. This paper is a discursive view of brand loyalty as it applies to the marketing imperatives of 2015. For a CEO, brand loyalty is the ultimate business deliverer, a f low state, but the hardest to achieve; more alchemy than science. Beyond Reason. This paper surveys recent literature about loyalty framed by our Lovemarks philosophy regarding the future beyond brands, but more particularly, it proposes that mastering the emotional dimensions of marketing is by far the most important requisite of an enterprising life in business. AUTHOR Kevin Roberts is New York-based Executive Chairman of Saatchi & Saatchi and Head Coach of Publicis Groupe, the world’s third largest communications group. Saatchi & Saatchi is one of the world’s leading creative organizations with 6500 people and 130 offices in 70 countries and works with six of the top 10 and over half of the top 50 global advertisers. Kevin Roberts started his career in the late 1960s as a brand manager with iconic London fashion house Mary Quant. He became a senior marketing executive for Gillette and Procter & Gamble in Europe and the Middle East. At 32, he became CEO of Pepsi-Cola Middle East; and later Pepsi’s CEO in Canada. In 1989, Roberts moved with his family to Auckland, New Zealand, to become Chief Operating Officer with Lion Nathan.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Brands Become Partners for Life? Customer Brand Relationship (CBR)
    How do brands become partners for life? Customer Brand Relationship (CBR) The issue of brand management and evaluation has become ever more important and essential for brand research over the last few decades. Companies use brand research to help evaluate WHERE in the purchasing decision- making process of the consumer (now referred to as the “consumer journey”) their brand is positioned and WHY. This knowledge is needed in order to manage brands in a targeted way in future. On the one hand, this means setting the brand apart from the competition, and on the other, meeting the ideals of consumers, convincing them to continue along the consumer journey. In light of this, it is not surprising that a number of approaches aim to explain why a brand has been successful in reaching consumers at a particular stage in the consumer journey, while others have not yet been able to progress further or are in a critical position. In short, what determines brand strength and the appeal of different brands in the market and therefore validates the position it assumes in the specific decision-making process? In this context, different emotional attitudes play a key role. The research approach for brand evaluation has been undergoing constant development for many years, often influenced by the latest scientific findings. Attempting to explain the WHERE was the starting point: purchasing intention is the typical basis for approaches to brand strength measurement. It is described as a mental state which reflects the intent of customers to buy a set volume of a specific brands goods over a particular period of time (Howard, 1994) or as a subjective prediction of future behavior (Blackwell/Minard/Engel, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH FINDINGS and FUTURE PRIORITIES Kevin Lane Keller
    BRANDS AND BRANDING: RESEARCH FINDINGS AND FUTURE PRIORITIES Kevin Lane Keller Tuck School of Business Dartmouth College Hanover, NH 03755 (603) 646-0393 (o) (603) 646-1308 (f) [email protected] Donald R. Lehmann Graduate School of Business Columbia University 507 Uris Hall 3022 Broadway New York, NY 10027 (212) 854-3465 (o) (212) 854-8762 (f) [email protected] August 2004 Revised February 2005 Second Revision May 2005 Thanks to Kathleen Chattin from Intel Corporation and Darin Klein from Microsoft Corporation, members of the Marketing Science Institute Brands and Branding Steering Group, and participants at the Marketing Science Institute Research Generation Conference and 2004 AMA Doctoral Consortium for helpful feedback and suggestions. BRANDS AND BRANDING: RESEARCH FINDINGS AND FUTURE PRIORITIES ABSTRACT Branding has emerged as a top management priority in the last decade due to the growing realization that brands are one of the most valuable intangible assets that firms have. Driven in part by this intense industry interest, academic researchers have explored a number of different brand-related topics in recent years, generating scores of papers, articles, research reports, and books. This paper identifies some of the influential work in the branding area, highlighting what has been learned from an academic perspective on important topics such as brand positioning, brand integration, brand equity measurement, brand growth, and brand management. The paper also outlines some gaps that exist in the research of branding and brand equity and formulates a series of related research questions. Choice modeling implications of the branding concept and the challenges of incorporating main and interaction effects of branding as well as the impact of competition are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination and Theorisation of Consumer-Brand Relationship and Its Link to Customer-Based Brand Equity By
    An Examination and Theorisation of Consumer-Brand Relationship and its Link to Customer-Based Brand Equity by Naser Pourazad Thesis Submitted to Flinders University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Business, Government and Law 5th of October, 2018 1 I certify that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgment any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any university; and that to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Naser Pourazad 2 Abstract Over the past decades, scholars have shown great interest in understanding the way consumers develop personal connections with brands. In fact, consumer-brand relationship has been a topical focus of published works in branding and consumer research. In addition, managers of many globally known brands have incorporated strategies to nurture strong bonds with their consumers. However, it is still not clear how brand relationships unfold. In particular, there is a need for research to understand how to strike a balance between the emotional and cognitive factors, which drive consumer-brand relationships. Therefore, the primary goal of this thesis is to improve understanding of consumer-brand relationships, with a particular focus on the role of emotions as a key contributing facet, in addition to the cognitive elements as crucial drivers. In doing so, the thesis draws upon the literature on consumer-brand relationships and relational concepts as well as the seminal studies on the customer-based brand equity (CBBE) to conceptualise and test relevant frameworks.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Brand Relationships Research: a Bibliometric Citation Meta-Analysis Marc Fetscherin Rollins College, [email protected]
    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online Faculty Publications 2-2015 Consumer Brand Relationships Research: A Bibliometric Citation Meta-Analysis Marc Fetscherin Rollins College, [email protected] Daniel Heinrich Technische Universität Braunschweig, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.rollins.edu/as_facpub Part of the Advertising and Promotion Management Commons, Communication Commons, and the Psychology Commons Published In Fetscherin, M., and Heinrich, D. (2015), “Consumer-Brand Relationship Research: A Bibliometric Citation Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68(2), pp. 380-390. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Consumer Brand Relationships Research: A Bibliometric Citation Meta-Analysis 1. Introduction In the last two decades the number of academic journal articles dealing with research on consumer brand relationships (CBR) has increased rapidly thus reflecting the tremendous relevance of this research area in the literature. The beginning of this research area is marked by Fournier’s seminal work on consumer and their brands published in the Journal of Consumer Research in 1998. With good cause we have chosen Fournier’s work as a starting point for a bibliometric meta-analysis for the following reasons. First, also Blackston’s book chapter in 1993 “Beyond Brand Personality: Building Brand Relationships” and later Fajer and Schouten’s (1995) paper “Breakdown and Dissolution of Person-Brand Relationships “ already discussed consumer brand relationships, it was not until Fournier’s (1998) article which provides a theoretical foundation and explanation for consumer brand relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Planning Online
    Strategic Planning for the real world How to harness the wealth of information, inspiration and insight on the Internet for more resonant, relevant and effective communications Nicholine Hayward April 2009 ͞WĞƌŚĂƉƐLJou will seek out some trove of data and sift through it, balancing your intelligence and intuition to arrive at a glimmering new idea.͟ Steven D Levitt and Stephen J Dubner Freakonomics Introduction The problem with Planning is that we need to know what people want. This means asking them questions, which immediately creates a dilemma. Every group, every, omnibus, survey or depth interview, however carefully planned and objectively moderated, engenders a sense of self- consciousness in the respondents that can skew the results. tĞ͛ǀĞall been to Groups where someone was afraid to speak while another liked the sound of his own voice a bit too much. tŽƵůĚŶ͛ƚŝƚďĞŶŝĐĞƚŽďĞable to ƐĞĞǁŚĂƚǁĂƐŝŶƉĞŽƉůĞ͛ƐŚĞĂĚƐǁŝƚŚŽut having to ask? Would it be good to have data from a larger proportion of the population than the base sizes we normally have? tŝƚŚƚŚĞƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚŵĞƚŚŽĚŽůŽŐLJ/͛ŵĂďŽƵƚƚŽĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞ͕we can. By looking at what millions of people are asking for and talking about online, we have access to the largest, most honest and unself- conscious focus group in the world. We can apply the results of this methodology to every stage of a business and marketing strategy, from developing the products that people are looking for and improving the ones they are already buying, to devising communications campaigns that really strike a chord. We can use it to see market and category dynamics reflected in consumer awareness and demand, to find out what people think about a brand, create rounded and realistic pen portraits and a resonant tone of voice or to gain insights into consumer behaviour ʹ and how best to reach them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ultimate Guide to Brand Management © Outfit, 2019 All Rights Reserved
    The Ultimate Guide to Brand Management © Outfit, 2019 All rights reserved. The Ultimate Guide to Brand Management Table of Contents 01 .What is ‘brand’? ....................................................................................1 02 .The history of ‘brand’ in 2 minutes ......................................................5 03 .The basics of brand management ........................................................9 04 .The importance of brand architecture and heirachy .........................15 05 .Strategies for a house of brands or a branded house ........................19 06 .What does on-brand mean? ...............................................................25 07 .Brand strategy from A to not-quite Z .................................................31 08 .The power of brand integrity ..............................................................57 09 .How good brand management translates to results ..........................63 10 .Brand management in a decentralised environment .........................66 11 .How to ensure brand compliance ......................................................73 12 .How to rebrand ...................................................................................79 13 .What does it mean to debrand? .........................................................92 14 .The biggest challenges for a central marketing team ........................96 15 .How to be more efficient with marketing production ......................102 16 .What is brand automation? ...............................................................108
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Experience and Brand Relationship to Brand Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty Shopping Distribution of Consumer Philips Lighting Product in Indonesia
    Sylvia Christianti BUDI, Z. HIDAYAT, La MANI / Journal of Distribution Science 19-1 (2021) 115-124 115 Print ISSN: 1738-3110 / Online ISSN 2093-7717 JDS website: http://www.jds.or.kr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.1.202101.115 The Effects of Experience and Brand Relationship to Brand Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty Shopping Distribution of Consumer Philips Lighting Product in Indonesia Sylvia Christianti BUDI1, Z. HIDAYAT2, La MANI3 Received: October 15, 2020. Revised: December 23, 2020. Accepted: January 05, 2021. Abstract Purpose: This study examines the effects of several brand variables on customer satisfaction and brand loyalty. Research design, data, and methodology: The survey was conducted on a community with 302 city residents in Greater Jakarta as consumers of lighting products. The constructs were arranged based on several independent variables such as brand experience, brand relationships, and brand trust on customer satisfaction and brand loyalty. Customer satisfaction was positioned as an intervening variable to examine the effects on brand loyalty. Results: The consumer's experience determines the attitude and satisfaction at the next action. Brand experience significantly influences customer satisfaction and brand loyalty. Meanwhile, a brand association related to the benefits of the product concerned so that the relationship also affects customer satisfaction and brand loyalty. However, the brand relationship does not affect brand trust. Consumers do not readily believe without experience. Conclusion: The consumer's experience significantly influences satisfaction and brand loyalty, both direct and indirect. Brand relationships affected customer satisfaction and had a direct effect on brand loyalty. Likewise, brand trust has a direct effect on brand loyalty.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Relationship Marketing Variables on Brand Resonance: Mediating Role of Brand Attitude
    International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-9 Issue-2, December, 2019 Impact of Relationship Marketing Variables on Brand Resonance: Mediating Role of Brand Attitude Divyasre. V. S, Ramya .J Abstract: Relationship Marketing has got its values strongly So it is believed that Relationship Marketing plays an rooted in business and market place right from the year 1983. It important role in developing concrete relationships with e is the core sphere of operation for all kinds of trade and no 3 organization overlooks this concept. Holding this importance of retail customers (Berry & Bendapudi, 1997) . Eventually, Relationship Marketing as a core idea, the study aims at the e retailers have started to establish relationship with discerning the impact of Relationship Marketing Variables on customers online through online communities believing Brand Resonance. Brand Resonance is yet another dominant such an initiative would enhance the performance. But still state of psychological connect which every company would like to little researches have been conducted to evaluate the establish with the customers. The Relationship Marketing effectiveness of Relationship Marketing (Sharma & Sheth, Variables Trust, conflict handling, empathy and Satisfaction are 4 considered for the analysis. Brand Loyalty, Brand Community, 2016) . Brand Engagement and Brand Attachment are the variables of Brand Resonance defines the customers relationship with Brand Resonance. Focusing on the relationship marketing the brand and the level of “sync” they establish with the variables that contributes towards high brand resonance would 5 enable companies to contemplate on these profit enabling areas brand (Keller, 2008) . It plays a significant role in CRM and that eventually leads to a sustenance growth for the organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Relationship Between Brand Personality and Brand Loyalty in Tehran, Iran: Case of Iphone Smartphone
    International Journal of Research in Management ISSN 2249-5908 Available online on http://www.rspublication.com/ijrm/ijrm_index.htm Issue 6, Vol. 5 (September 2016) Determining the Relationship between Brand Personality and Brand Loyalty in Tehran, Iran: Case of iPhone Smartphone Ladan Safa #1, Mohammad Reza Daraei#2 #1 MBA Student, Department of Management, Payame Noor, Post code: 3971189451 Tehran, Iran, Email: [email protected] #2 Assistant professor, Department of Management, Payame Noor, Tehran, Iran ABSTRACT Previous researchers have explored the relationship between brand personality and brand loyalty and role of brand personality in enhancing brand loyalty has been highlighted in many studies. The current research aims to determine the relationship between brand personality and brand loyalty among customers of iPhone Smartphone in Tehran (capital city of Iran). In order to achieve this, quantitative approach involving data collection from two hundred and thirty consumers was taken. Based on the literature, brand personality is a function of five dimensions which are Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, Sophistication, and Ruggedness. In order to data analysis, reliability tests, correlation tests, and standard regression analysis were run in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. The results reveal that each dimension of brand personality has a positive and significant relationship with brand personality. Moreover, results of regression analysis supports that brand personality has a positive and high relationship
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Report on the World's Most Valuable Automobile, Auto Component & Tire Brands March 2018
    Auto & Tires 2018 The annual report on the world’s most valuable automobile, auto component & tire brands March 2018 Foreword. What is the purpose of a strong brand: to attract customers, to build loyalty, to motivate staff? All true, but for a commercial brand at least, the first answer must always be ‘to make money’. Huge investments are made in the design, launch, and ongoing promotion of brands. Given their potential financial value, this makes sense. Unfortunately, most organisations fail to go beyond that, missing huge opportunities to effectively make use of what are often their most important assets. Monitoring of brand performance should be the next step, but is often sporadic. Where it does take place, it frequently lacks financial rigour and is heavily reliant on qualitative measures, poorly understood by non-marketers. David Haigh As a result, marketing teams struggle to communicate the value of their work and CEO, Brand Finance boards then underestimate the significance of their brands to the business. Sceptical finance teams, unconvinced by what they perceive as marketing mumbo jumbo, may fail to agree necessary investments. What marketing spend there is, can end up poorly directed as marketers are left to operate with insufficient financial guidance or accountability. The end result can be a slow but steady downward spiral of poor communication, wasted resources, and a negative impact on the bottom line. Brand Finance bridges the gap between marketing and finance. Our teams have experience across a wide range of disciplines from market research and visual identity to tax and accounting. We understand the importance of design, advertising, and marketing, but we also believe that the ultimate and overriding purpose of brands is to make money.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Consumer Relationships with Human Brands: How Reference Groups, Affiliation Motives, and Biological Sex Predict Endorser Effectiveness
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 9-25-2015 12:00 AM Exploring Consumer Relationships with Human Brands: How Reference Groups, Affiliation Motives, and Biological Sex Predict Endorser Effectiveness Jennifer A. Jeffrey The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Matthew Thomson The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Business A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Jennifer A. Jeffrey 2015 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Marketing Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey, Jennifer A., "Exploring Consumer Relationships with Human Brands: How Reference Groups, Affiliation Motives, and Biological Sex Predict Endorser Effectiveness" (2015). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 3238. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3238 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXPLORING CONSUMER RELATIONSHIPS WITH HUMAN BRANDS: HOW REFERENCE GROUPS, AFFILIATION MOTIVES, AND BIOLOGICAL SEX PREDICT ENDORSER EFFECTIVENESS (Thesis format: Monograph) by Jennifer Jeffrey Graduate Program in Business Administration A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Jennifer Jeffrey 2015 Abstract Using a human brand (commonly referred to in popular press as a celebrity) as a product endorser is a popular marketing tool, and a variety of factors have been shown to influence the effectiveness of this technique.
    [Show full text]