Kenya Giraffe Conservation Status Report March 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kenya Giraffe Conservation Status Report March 2021 Country Profile Republic of Kenya Giraffe Conservation Status Report March 2021 General statistics Size of country: 582,650 km² Size of protected areas / percentage protected area coverage: 46,612 km² (8%) Species and subspecies In 2016, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) completed the first detailed assessment of the conservation status of giraffe, revealing that their numbers are in peril. The IUCN currently recognises one species (Giraffa camelopardalis) and nine subspecies of giraffe (Muller et al. 2018) historically based on outdated assessments of their morphological features and geographic ranges. The subspecies are thus divided: Angolan giraffe (G. c. angolensis), Kordofan giraffe (G. c. antiquorum), Masai giraffe (G. c. tippelskirchi), Nubian giraffe (G. c. camelopardalis), reticulated giraffe (G. c. reticulata), Rothschild’s giraffe (G. c. rothschildi), South African giraffe (G. c. giraffa), Thornicroft’s giraffe (G. c. thornicrofti) and West African giraffe (G. c. peralta). The decline in giraffe range and numbers was further emphasised when most of the IUCN-recognised subspecies were assessed in 2018 – some as Critically Endangered. While this update further confirms the real threat to one of Africa’s most charismatic megafauna, it also highlights a rather confusing aspect of giraffe conservation: how many species/subspecies of giraffe are there? The Giraffe Conservation Foundation (GCF) together with their partner Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) have performed the first-ever comprehensive DNA sampling and analysis (genomic, nuclear and mitochondrial) of major natural populations of giraffe throughout their range in Africa. As a result, an update of the traditional taxonomy now exists. This study revealed that there are four species of giraffe and likely six subspecies (Fennessy et al. 2016; Winter et al. 2018). The four species are Masai giraffe (G. tippelskirchi), northern giraffe (G. camelopardalis), reticulated giraffe (G. reticulata) and southern giraffe (G. giraffa). The northern giraffe has three subspecies: Nubian giraffe (G. c. camelopardalis), Kordofan giraffe (G. c. antiquorum), and West African giraffe (G. c. peralta). The southern giraffe has two subspecies: Angolan giraffe (G. g. angolensis) and South African giraffe (G. g. giraffa). Two of the former subspecies have been subsumed within other taxa as data support that they are genetically identical: the Rothschild’s giraffe is synonymous with the Nubian giraffe and as such, in all GCF publications, we use Nubian giraffe to refer to Rothschild’s giraffe populations as well. The Luangwa (or Thornicroft’s) giraffe are genetically similar to Masai giraffe though additional research is needed to determine whether to completely subsume populations or consider them subspecies of Masai giraffe (Fennessy et al. 2016; Winter et al. 2018). Based on this research, GCF refers to the updated giraffe taxonomy of four species in all publications, while a taxonomy review by the IUCN is ongoing. GCF is dedicated to securing a future for all giraffe populations in the wild. The following species and subspecies of giraffe occur in Kenya: Species: Northern giraffe (Giraffe camelopardalis) Masai giraffe (Giraffa tippelskirchi) Reticulated giraffe (Giraffa reticulata) Subspecies: Nubian giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis) Conservation Status IUCN Red List: Giraffa camelopardalis (as a species) – Vulnerable (Muller et al. 2018) Giraffa tippelskirchi – Endangered (Bolger et al. 2019); as a subspecies Giraffa reticulata – Endangered (Muneza et al. 2018); as a subspecies Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis – Critically Endangered (Wube et al. 2018); as a subspecies In the Republic of Kenya: In the Republic of Kenya (referred to as Kenya henceforth), Masai, reticulated and Nubian (Rothschild’s) giraffe are accorded full protection under the Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013 (No. 47) (KWS 2018). In the Sixth Schedule of the Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013 section No. 47, Nubian (Rothschild’s) giraffe are listed as ‘Endangered’ while the other two species are not categorised in any listing but the hunting or killing of any species of giraffe is illegal in the country. In addition, any person that commits an offence, for example poaching any endangered or threatened species will be penalised a fine not less than 20 million Kenya shillings or a life imprisonment or both penalties. Kenya was among the countries that pushed for giraffe to be listed in the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species (CITES), with giraffe now listed as CITES Appendix II (CITES 2019). This means that species listed in CITES Appendix II are protected from any form of uncontrolled trade which could threaten their survival (CITES 2019). Additionally, giraffe are also protected by the Convention of Migratory Species (CMS) under Appendix II (KWS 2018). Species listed in CMS Appendix II are migratory species that move across international borders and require international agreements between the range states on their conservation and management. Kenya is actively involved developing additional international agreements in conserving giraffe as agreed in Appendix II, participate in tri- annual Convention of Parties meetings, and financially support the CMS secretariat (Hensz & Soberon 2018). Issues/threats Kenya is home to three giraffe species, all of which vary in abundance and distribution and face their own set of conservation challenges and threats. A degree of uncertainty surrounds the exact geographic and taxonomic limits of giraffe in Kenya (Brown et al. 2007; Hassanin et al. 2007). Recent phylogenetic studies determined independently that the three giraffe species are separate and distinct from each other. Northern and reticulated giraffe evolved with the northern phylogenetic clade, whereas Masai giraffe evolved with the southern clade (Winter et al. 2018). These lineages appear to be maintained in the absence of historical barriers 2 Country Profile: Republic of Kenya – Giraffe Conservation Status Report to gene flow. Several cryptic mechanisms for maintaining what appears to be a long history of reproductive isolation have been suggested, however, this remains poorly understood (Brown et al. 2007). In Kenya, for example, the three species are found within different geographical ranges with natural barriers such as mountains and rivers, and artificial barriers such as fences preventing gene flow. However, recent studies by GCF and Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) have revealed very low level and historic gene flow between Nubian and reticulated giraffe in some parts of northern Kenya. Although many parts of East Africa remain unrivalled in diversity and abundance of wildlife, conservation efforts in the region face several challenges (Ogutu et al. 2011a). Kenya’s human population has grown exponentially over the last century, with an estimated population density of 94 people per km2, which not only places intense pressure on the land, but also increases habitat encroachment and human wildlife conflict (AWF 2013; KWS 2019; Worldometer 2019). In addition, habitat fragmentation and degradation, illegal hunting, unsustainable land use practices, climate change, and tourism market volatility all pose serious threats to the survival of giraffe in Kenya (Muthiani 2001; Mizutani et al. 2003; Wanala 2005; Githiru et al. 2007; Fennessy & Brown 2008; Ogutu et al. 2011a; KWS 2019). Of Kenya’s total giraffe population, 70% is found outside of government protected areas on communal grazing lands and/or group ranches (Wanjala 2005; Githiru et al. 2007; O’Connor et al. 2019). In fact, most of Kenya’s wildlife (65-70%) is found on communal and privately protected land, necessitating the need for people, livestock, and wildlife to co-exist and share the same natural resources (Wanjala 2005; Githiru et al. 2007; Ogutu et al. 2017). While poverty has been reduced in Kenya over the past ten years, it remains widespread across the country and is especially high in rangelands where the majority of Kenya’s human population comprises of pastoralist groups relying on subsistence agriculture (AWF 2013; Pape & Mejia-Mantilla 2019). Farming often overlaps with critical wildlife habitat, degrading land and putting humans and wildlife at odds (AWF 2013). Additionally, as the country tries to build an infrastructure to support its growing population, it often comes at the expense of areas of rich biodiversity, including important wildlife habitat (AWF 2013). Masai giraffe Masai giraffe are the most abundant giraffe species in East Africa (GCF 2019). However, the proliferation of the species in the southern parts of Kenya is threatened by wholesale changes in land-use and tenure, particularly the introduction of crop farming, logging, charcoal burning, development of urban centres that fragment habitats and disrupt wildlife movements, as well as illegal hunting for bushmeat (Ngene et al. 2001; KWS & TAWIRI 2010; Ogutu et al. 2011a). For instance, in the Masai Mara Ecosystem, the decline of Masai giraffe has been attributed to habitat fragmentation and loss of wildlife dispersal areas, illegal hunting, as well as an increase of human settlements and land use changes (Hofer et al. 1996; Ottichilo et al. 2000; Ogutu et al. 2008, 2009, 2011a). The presence of livestock and increasing human activities has also negatively influenced the distribution of giraffe populations within the Masai Mara
Recommended publications
  • Kenya Country Office
    Kenya Country Office Flood Situation Report Report # 1: 24 November 2019 Highlights Situation in Numbers The National Disaster Operations Center (NDOC) estimates that at least 330,000 330,000 people are affected - 18,000 people have been displaced and 120 people affected people have died due to floods and landslides. (NDOC-24/11/2019) A total of 6,821 children have been reached through integrated outreach 31 services and 856 people have received cholera treatment through UNICEF-supported treatment centres. counties affected by flooding (NDOC-24/11/2019) A total of 270 households in Turkana County (out of 400 targeted) and 110 households in Wajir county have received UNICEF family emergency kits 120 (including 20-litre and 10-litre bucket), soap and water treatment tablets people killed from flooding through partnership with the Kenya Red Cross. (NDOC-24/11/2019) UNICEF has reached 55,000 people with WASH supplies consisting of 20- litre jerrycans, 10-litre buckets and multipurpose bar soap. 18,000 UNICEF has completed solarization of two boreholes reaching people displaced approximately 20,500 people with access to safe water in Garissa County. (NDOC-24/11/2019) Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs Kenya has continued to experience enhanced rainfall resulting in flooding since mid-October, negatively impacting the lives and livelihoods of vulnerable populations. According to the National Disaster Operations Center (NDOC) 24 November 2019 updates, major roads have been cut off in 11 counties, affecting accessibility to affected populations for rapid assessments and delivery of humanitarian assistance, especially in parts of West Pokot, Marsabit, Mandera, Turkana, Garissa, Lamu, Mombasa, Tana River, Taita Taveta, Kwale and Wajir Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • The 2010 Constitution and Electoral Governance in Kenya: Prospects for the Prevention of Electoral Violence………………………………………………………………62 Nzau Mumo and Stellah Kingoro
    Volume I, Number 1, 2013 ISSN N0 2309-1010 LAIKIPIA UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, EDUCATION AND HUMANITIES EDITORAL BOARD ______________________________________________________________________________ Editor in Chief Prof. Felicia Yieke Series Editor Dr. Jacinta Ndambuki Associate Editors Prof. James Ogola Dr. Musau Kithuka Dr. Isaac Ochieng Dr. Babere Chacha Technical Editors Mr. John Kingau Mr. Enrique Muthangya _____________________________________________________________________________ Advisory Board Prof. Francis K. Lelo Laikipia University, Kenya Prof. Ruth Wodak Lancaster University, United Kingdom Dr. Meredith Marra Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand Prof. Emilia Ilieva Egerton University, Kenya Prof. Maurice Amutabi Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), Kenya Prof. Winnie V. Mitullah University of Nairobi, Kenya Prof. Adebayo Olukoshi Director, UN African Institute for Economic Development and Planning (IDEP), Dakar-Senegal ©Laikipia University, 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this journal may be reproduced transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording of any information, storage or retrieval system without permission from the publisher. Laikipia University Journal of Social Sciences, Education and Humanities (JSSEH), ISSN N0 2309-1010 is published by Laikipia University, P.O. Box 1100-20300, Nyahururu, Kenya Circulation and Sales Price Cover Price Per Unit Kenya Kshs 500 (US$10) Rest of Africa Kshs 700 (US$15) Other parts of the World Kshs 1000 (US$20) Preamble JSSEH is a scholarly and professional journal published once a year by the Department of Research, Extension and Consultancy (REC), Laikipia University. The journal is dedicated to scientific research in Social Sciences, Education and the Humanities. It provides a platform for multidisciplinary and policy related research.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Dynamics in Conservancies in Kenya: the Case of Isiolo County
    \ WORKING PAPER 3\ 2020 Security dynamics in conservancies in Kenya: The case of Isiolo County Kennedy Mkutu \ United States International University-Africa, Nairobi Collaborative Research Center 228 Future Rural Africa: Future-making and social-ecological transformation \ WORKING PAPER 3 \ 2020 SECURITY DYNAMICS IN CONSERVANCIES IN KENYA: THE CASE OF ISIOLO COUNTY\ K. MKUTU SUMMARY The community-based conservation model is an increasing phenomenon in Kenya, especially in northern pastoralist counties. This Working Paper, the result of empirical research over several years, considers dimensions of inclusion and exclusion and subsequent conflicts around community- based conservancies in Isiolo County. It finds that conservancies are sometimes established to protect a community’s interests in and access to community land, including formal claim-making over ancestral community land which may spatially exclude other groups. These dimensions are reinforced by the presence of rangers, of whom many are armed National Police Reservists. Spatial and political dimensions of exclusion also exist to some extent within conservancies due to the need to balance wildlife and grazing needs. Armed security forces in conservancies have important implications for state sovereignty and control over the use of force. Importantly, a powerful donor-funded umbrella organisation (the Northern Rangelands Trust) is significantly involved in training, equipping and deploying rangers. The presence of well-equipped armed ranger teams may then inadvertently play into resource-based conflict and alter power balances between ethnic groups as is most clearly high- lighted on the Samburu–Isiolo border. Sustainability is another concern where donor funding is an important source. Another concern for the future is Isiolo’s position at the centre of the country’s infrastructural and economic development plans which threaten to dispossess pastoralists of community land.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Risk Profile Laikipia County Highlights
    Kenya County Climate Risk Profile Series Climate Risk Profile Laikipia County Highlights In Laikipia County, agriculture and livestock are the main sources of livelihood. They contribute more than 75% of household incomes and employ more than 60% of the county’s population. About 43% of the population are in absolute poverty while 27.2% rely on food aid during food shortages. Farmers in Laikipia County rely on rain fed agriculture and this makes them more vulnerable to climate variability especially during drought periods. Irrigation infrastructure is expensive and knowledge on diversification is inadequate. Rainwater harvesting through rooftops, water pans and dams will go a long way in providing water during dry spells for domestic, livestock and irrigation purposes. Several climatic hazards have been observed in the county e.g. drought, moisture stress and uncertainty in the onset and duration of seasons. These hazards pose a growing threat to the agricultural sector and often lead to significant crop and livestock production losses and food insecurity. Women and youth contribution to select value chains is high, therefore it is important to have highly targeted interventions that maximize on their involvement and increase their economic gains as well as decision-making powers. On-farm adaptation strategies include conservation agriculture, rainwater harvesting, fodder conservation, planting early maturing and drought tolerant crops, and drought resistant livestock and hybrid breeds. Off-farm adaptation strategies include education and research on climate smart practices, farmer/pastoralist field schools, early warning systems, sub-county specific climate based advisories, extension services, insurance, afforestation and re-afforestation. Kenya Meteorological Department (KMD), the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries (MoALF) and the Kenya Forestry Service (KFS) amongst others offer these services.
    [Show full text]
  • Out Patient Facilities for Nhif Supa Cover Baringo County Bomet County Bungoma County Busia County
    OUT PATIENT FACILITIES FOR NHIF SUPA COVER BARINGO COUNTY BRANCH No HOSPITAL NAME POSTAL ADDRESS OFFICE 1 TIONYBEI MEDICAL CLINIC 396-30400, KABARNET KABARNET 2 BARINGO DISTRICT HOSPITAL (KABARNET) 21-30400, KABARNET KABARNET 3 REALE MEDICAL CENTRE-KABARNET 4694-30100, ELDORET KABARNET 4 KERIO HOSPITAL LTD 458-30400, KABARNET KABARNET 5 RAVINE GLORY HEALTH CARE SERVICES 612-20103, ELDAMA RAVINE KABARNET 6 ELDAMA RAVINE NURSING HOME 612-20103, ELDAMA RAVINE KABARNET 7 BARNET MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTRE 490-30400, KABARNET KABARNET BOMET COUNTY BRANCH No HOSPITAL NAME POSTAL ADDRESS OFFICE 1 CHELYMO MEDICAL CENTRE 37-20422 SILIBWET BOMET 2 KAPKOROS HEALTH CENTRE 20400 BOMET BOMET BUNGOMA COUNTY BRANCH No HOSPITAL NAME POSTAL ADDRESS OFFICE 1 CHWELE SUBCOUNTY HOSPITAL 202 - 50202 CHWELE BUNGOMA 2 LUMBOKA MEDICAL SERVICES 1883 - 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 3 WEBUYE HEALTH CENTRE 25 - WEBUYE BUNGOMA 4 ST JAMES OPTICALS 2141 50200 BUNGOMA 5 NZOIA MEDICAL CENTRE 471 - 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 6 TRINITY OPTICALS LIMITED PRIVATE BAG BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 7 KHALABA MEDICAL SERVICES 2211- 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 8 ARARAT MEDICAL CLINIC 332 KIMILILI BUNGOMA 9 SIRISIA SUBDISTRICT HOSPITAL 122 - 50208 SIRISIA BUNGOMA 10 NZOIA MEDICAL CENTRE - CHWELE 471 - 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 11 OPEN HEART MEDICAL CENTRE 388 - 50202 CHWELE BUNGOMA 12 ICFEM DREAMLAND MISSION HOSPITAL PRIVATE BAG KIMILILI BUNGOMA 13 EMMANUEL MISSION HEALTH CENTRE 53 - 50207 MISIKHU BUNGOMA 14 WEBUYE DISTRICT HOSPITAL 25 - 50205 BUNGOMA 15 ELGON VIEW MEDICAL COTTAGE 1747 - 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 16 FRIENDS
    [Show full text]
  • County Name County Code Location
    COUNTY NAME COUNTY CODE LOCATION MOMBASA COUNTY 001 BANDARI COLLEGE KWALE COUNTY 002 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT MATUGA KILIFI COUNTY 003 PWANI UNIVERSITY TANA RIVER COUNTY 004 MAU MAU MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL LAMU COUNTY 005 LAMU FORT HALL TAITA TAVETA 006 TAITA ACADEMY GARISSA COUNTY 007 KENYA NATIONAL LIBRARY WAJIR COUNTY 008 RED CROSS HALL MANDERA COUNTY 009 MANDERA ARIDLANDS MARSABIT COUNTY 010 ST. STEPHENS TRAINING CENTRE ISIOLO COUNTY 011 CATHOLIC MISSION HALL, ISIOLO MERU COUNTY 012 MERU SCHOOL THARAKA-NITHI 013 CHIAKARIGA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL EMBU COUNTY 014 KANGARU GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KITUI COUNTY 015 MULTIPURPOSE HALL KITUI MACHAKOS COUNTY 016 MACHAKOS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE MAKUENI COUNTY 017 WOTE TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE NYANDARUA COUNTY 018 ACK CHURCH HALL, OL KALAU TOWN NYERI COUNTY 019 NYERI PRIMARY SCHOOL KIRINYAGA COUNTY 020 ST.MICHAEL GIRLS BOARDING MURANGA COUNTY 021 MURANG'A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KIAMBU COUNTY 022 KIAMBU INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY TURKANA COUNTY 023 LODWAR YOUTH POLYTECHNIC WEST POKOT COUNTY 024 MTELO HALL KAPENGURIA SAMBURU COUNTY 025 ALLAMANO HALL PASTORAL CENTRE, MARALAL TRANSZOIA COUNTY 026 KITALE MUSEUM UASIN GISHU 027 ELDORET POLYTECHNIC ELGEYO MARAKWET 028 IEBC CONSTITUENCY OFFICE - ITEN NANDI COUNTY 029 KAPSABET BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BARINGO COUNTY 030 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT, KABARNET LAIKIPIA COUNTY 031 NANYUKI HIGH SCHOOL NAKURU COUNTY 032 NAKURU HIGH SCHOOL NAROK COUNTY 033 MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY KAJIADO COUNTY 034 MASAI TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE KERICHO COUNTY 035 KERICHO TEA SEC. SCHOOL
    [Show full text]
  • Turkana County & Un Joint Integrated
    United Nations KENYA Umoja ni Nguvu TURKANA COUNTY & UN JOINT INTEGRATED AREA-BASED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Programme Cycle Report January 2016 - June 2018 United Nations KENYA Umoja ni Nguvu Disclaimer: While all necessary efforts have been taken to ensure that information contained in this publication is correct and not misleading, the possibility of errors or unintentional omissions cannot be excluded. Further details on progress by specific UN Agencies, Funds or Programmes in Turkana can be obtained from the respective organisations. Photo credits: UNDP Kenya, UNICEF Kenya and Turkana County Government Source of data: Turkana CIDP I and II, unless otherwise stated. For enquiries, contact: Office of the United Nations Resident Coordinator United Nations Office in Nairobi, Block M, Level 3, P.O. Box 30218, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Phone: +254 20 7626796 Twitter: @UnKenya www.ke.one.un.org TURKANA COUNTY & UN JOINT INTEGRATED AREA-BASED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Programme Cycle Report January 2016 - June 2018 CONTENTS 3 Abbreviations 5 Foreword 6 Executive Summary 9 Background Key Development Strategies Programme Management Structure 15 Key Developments in Turkana Transformational governance Human Capital Development Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth Environmental Sustainability, Land Management & Human Security 25 Programme Achievements Transformational governance Human Capital Development Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth Environmental Sustainability, Land Management & Human Security 44 Key Programme Milestones 47 Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Appendices
    Appendix 1: Chart of Abuses against Journalists and Bloggers Name Media/ Nature of Incident What happened? Investigation Location violation Date Status 1. John Kituyi Mirror Weekly, Killed April 30, Attacked by Investigations are Eldoret 2015 unknown incomplete, no assailants outside one has been his house. arrested or charged. 2. Denis Otieno Freelance Killed September 7, Attacked by No one has been photojournalist, 2016 unknown arrested or Kitale assailants inside charged. his house at night. 3. Emmanuel Masha KNA, Tana River Assaulted October 13, Administration No official 2016 Police officers investigations attacked but did were opened. not destroy his camera. 4. Duncan Wanga K24 TV, Eldoret Assaulted September Uasin Gishu Deputy No investigations, and his 27, 2016 OCS assaulted him but the OCS later camera and destroyed his apologized and destroyed camera. compensated Wanga for the damaged camera. 5. Julius Kareithi Royal Media, Assaulted September 4, Security guards of No investigations Murang’a 2016 private company so far and no one attacked and held to account. injured him. “NOT WORTH THE RISK” 54 6. James Mburu Royal Media, Assaulted September 4, Security guards of No investigations Murang’a 2016 private company so far and no one attacked and held to account. injured him. 7. Grace Gitau Nation Media Assaulted, August 23, Nyeri members of No evidence of Group, Nyeri equipment 2016 county assembly investigations or county confiscated attacked them for prosecution. focusing only on negatives. 8. Lydia Nyawira Standard Group, Assaulted, August 23, Nyeri members of No evidence of Nyeri county equipment 2016 county assembly investigations or confiscated attacked them for prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Samburu SMART Survey Report – February 2013
    SAMBURU CENTRAL DISTRICT SMART NUTRITION SURVEY REPORT (Final Report) Conducted by: World Vision Kenya and Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation Services With Support from UNICEF February 2013 Submitted to: World Vision Kenya Country Office Report compiled by: Martin Meme Consultant Nutritionist Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Kenyatta University P.O. Box 43844 (00100) Nairobi Cell: 0722-306607 Email: [email protected] 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I most sincerely thank World Vision Kenya for according me the opportunity to undertake this survey in Samburu Central district. Successful implementation of the survey was made possible through the input of a number of people. I most gratefully appreciate the useful technical input from Daniel Muhinja, the Nutrition Information Working Group (NIWG) and Moragwa Oirere. The Samburu Senior IPA Manager (Charles Kasura), the Samburu Nutrition Programme Manager (Peter Wangai), Judith Muango, Lilian Kagwiria and Alfred Karisa (Samburu Project Officers - Nutrition), Koros Geoffrey (Project Officer - WASH), Josphat Lenguris (Samburu Deputy Public Health Nutritionist) and Humprey Mosomi (Samburu County Nutrition Support Officer - UNICEF) all played crucial roles during training, logistical coordination and field data collection supervision. The field and data entry teams are appreciated for collecting quality data and data entry, respectively. Special thanks go to the entire Samburu Central district community members for sparing time to provide the required information during household visits and
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Intergrated Development Plans for Samburu and Turkana Counties to Identify Gaps in Relation to Violent Conflicts A
    2019 Assessment of Intergrated Development Plans for Samburu and Turkana Counties to Identify Gaps in Relation to Violent Conflicts Among Pastoralists in the Border Areas BELISAN Advisory Ltd 8/31/2019 2019 Assessment of Intergrated Development Plans for Samburu and Turkana Counties to Identify Gaps in Relation to Violent Conflicts Among Pastoralists in the Border Areas PREFACE The need for this research work was borne out of the recognition of inter-communal and inter-clan conflicts as major concerns among the pastoral communities within the northern counties of Kenya. Specific focus was on the possible roles played by local politics and politicians as facilitators of inter- communal and inter-clan conflicts among the Baringo, Turkana, Samburu and West Pokot counties’ residents, especially those living at the cross-borders. The research further explored the existence and contribution of political economy and multi-dimensional predisposing factors to inter-community conflicts. The research reviewed the county integrated development plans (CIDP 2018-2022) for Samburu and Turkana counties as primary documents. Further analysis and case studies were obtained from the Baringo and West Pokot CIDP 2018-2022. Stories and experiences from stakeholder, including the local communities, in the 4 counties were recorded, and their recommendations on how to improve the CIDP 2018-2022 were captured. The findings of this work form an important output for equipping local pastoralists with the capacity to make sustainable contributions in the management of drought episodes and prevention of famine. Further, implementation of the recommendations contained in this report will help promote and strengthen participatory political environment and subsequently sound public policy frameworks in the target counties in respect to improving food security and abberting conflict along the borderlines of the 4 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Effect of Automating Financial Systems in Devolved Governments Perfomance a Case of Nairobi County
    THE STRATEGIC EFFECT OF AUTOMATING FINANCIAL SYSTEMS IN DEVOLVED GOVERNMENTS PERFOMANCE A CASE OF NAIROBI COUNTY LYDIA NJERI MAINA A RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTED INPARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, SCHOOLOF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI NOVEMBER, 2015 DECLARATION This research project is my original work and has not been presented for academic purposes in the University of Nairobi or any other university. Signed…………………………… Date…………………………… LYDIA NJERI MAINA D61/84311/2012 This research project will be submitted with my approval as the university supervisor. Signed…………………………… Date…………………………… PROF. BITANGE NDEMO SCHOOL OF BUSINESS UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI ii DEDICATION I dedicate this research project to All Mighty God, my dear husband Mr. John Maina, my children Kelvin and Maree for their love, moral and support you extended to me during my study: As well as their encouragement throughout my research. I love you all. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS From the initial stages to the final draft of this project and in partial fulfilment of the Master of Business Administration degree, I owe an immense debt of gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Bitange Ndemo for his invaluable support towards the completion of this project. His constructive criticism, careful guidance and patience have been very instrumental to the completion of this project in time. I would also like to thank the Nairobi County Government for availing the data I so much needed to complete this project within the time allocated to me. Special thanks go to the proposal presentation panel and colleagues who were present during the presentation of this project proposal.
    [Show full text]