Grey Sauble Source Protection Area

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved Chapter 2 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area October 15, 2015 Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved This page intentionally left blank. Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved APPROVED ASSESSMENT REPORT for the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Table of Contents CHAPTER 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 2.0 Watershed Characterization ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Source Protection Region .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Grey Sauble Source Protection Area ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Jurisdictions .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.1 Conservation Authorities ......................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.2 Municipalities .......................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.1.3 Provincial Ministries ................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.1.4 Federal Government ................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1.5 First Nations ............................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.2 Non-Governmental Organizations and the Public ................................................ 2-6 2.3 Physical Description....................................................................................................... 2-9 2.3.1 Surface Elevation (Topography) .......................................................................... 2-9 2.3.2 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................. 2-9 2.3.2.1 Karst Features ....................................................................................... 2-11 2.3.3 Surficial Geology ................................................................................................ 2-12 2.3.3.1 Overburden Thickness ........................................................................... 2-13 2.3.4 Physiography ...................................................................................................... 2-14 2.3.5 Soil Characteristics.............................................................................................. 2-14 2.4 Surface Water Hydrology .......................................................................................... 2-15 2.5 Naturally Vegetated Areas .......................................................................................... 2-16 2.5.1 Wetlands .............................................................................................................. 2-17 2.5.2 Woodlands and Vegetated Riparian Areas ......................................................... 2-21 2.5.2.1 Woodlands ............................................................................................. 2-21 2.5.2.2 Vegetated Riparian Areas ...................................................................... 2-22 2.6 Aquatic Ecology ........................................................................................................... 2-22 2.6.1 Fisheries ............................................................................................................. 2-22 2.6.2 Aquatic Macroinvertebrates ................................................................................ 2-24 2.6.3 Species and Habitats at Risk .............................................................................. 2-25 2.6.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................. 2-27 Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved 2.7 Human Characterization ............................................................................................. 2-28 2.7.1 Population Distribution and Density ................................................................... 2-28 2.7.2 Land Use ............................................................................................................ 2-29 2.7.2.1 Settlement Areas ................................................................................... 2-30 2.7.2.2 Rural Areas ............................................................................................ 2-31 2.7.2.3 Rural Residential .................................................................................... 2-31 2.7.2.4 Cottage and Camp Development ......................................................... 2-31 2.7.2.5 Planned Development ............................................................................ 2-32 2.7.2.6 Industrial/Commercial Sectors Distribution .......................................... 2-32 2.7.2.7 Quarries and Aggregate Extraction ....................................................... 2-32 2.7.2.8 Transportation ........................................................................................ 2-34 2.7.2.9 Utilities ................................................................................................... 2-34 2.7.2.10 Institutional Lands ................................................................................. 2-34 2.7.2.11 Hazard and Natural Environment Land Use ......................................... 2-35 2.7.2.12 Other Land Use ..................................................................................... 2-35 2.7.3 Wastewater Treatment ........................................................................................ 2-35 2.7.4 Brownfields ........................................................................................................ 2-36 2.7.5 Oil, Gas and Salt Facilities .................................................................................. 2-37 2.7.6 Agricultural Resources ....................................................................................... 2-37 2.7.7 Forestry ............................................................................................................... 2-42 2.7.8 Protected Areas .................................................................................................. 2-42 2.7.9 Recreation ........................................................................................................... 2-44 2.8 Water Quality .............................................................................................................. 2-45 2.8.1 Indicator Parameters............................................................................................ 2-46 2.8.2 Surface Water Quality Data Analysis ................................................................. 2-49 2.8.3 Groundwater Quality Data Analysis and Reporting ........................................... 2-54 2.8.4 Great Lakes Index Station Monitoring ................................................................ 2-57 2.9 Water Use ............................................................................................................... 2-59 2.10 Data and Knowledge Gaps for Watershed Characterization ................................ 2-60 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 2-61 MAPS Approved Assessment Report -- Grey Sauble Source Protection Area Approved List of Figures Figure 2.2.1 Shallow Lake ....................................................................................................... 2-2 Figure 2.3.1 Indian Falls Conservation Area ......................................................................... 2-10 Figure 2.3.2 Karst Formation ................................................................................................ 2-11 Figure 2.8.1 Summary of selected water quality parameters from the Great Lakes Index Station monitoring program at the Colpoys Bay (Georgian Bay) location ...... 2-58 Figure 2.8.2 Summary of selected water quality parameters from the Great Lakes Index Station monitoring program at the Owen Sound (Georgian Bay) location ....... 2-59 List of Tables Table 2.2.1 Municipalities within the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area (SPA) .............. 2-4 Table 2.2.2 Non-Governmental Organizations in the Grey Sauble SPA ............................... 2-6 Table 2.3.1 Stratigraphy of Bedrock in the Grey Sauble SPA ............................................. 2-10 Table 2.3.2 Summary of Quaternary Deposits and Events in the Grey Sauble SPA ........... 2-13 Table 2.4.1 River Systems in the Grey Sauble SPA .......................................................... 2-16 Table 2.5.1 Wetlands as a Percentage of Land Area in Subwatersheds in the Grey Sauble SPA ............................................................................................. 2-18 Table 2.5.2 Wetlands database for the Grey Sauble SPA .................................................... 2-19 Table 2.6.1 Classification by Thermal Regime of Streams in the Grey Sauble SPA ......... 2-23 Table 2.6.2 Species at Risk in the Grey Sauble SPA ........................................................... 2-26 Table 2.6.3 Invasive Species in the Grey Sauble SPA ......................................................... 2-27 Table 2.7.1 Population and Densities for Municipalities and First Nations in the Grey
Recommended publications
  • Ontario's Stream Rehabilitation Manual
    Ontario’s Stream Rehabilitation Manual Written by Mark G. Heaton Rick Grillmayer And Jack G. Imhof Illustrations By Roy DeGuisti Copyright by Ontario Streams 17266 Old Main Street, Belfountain, Ontario L0N 1B0 May 2002 All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Introduction The Created Need Restoration, Rehabilitation or Reclamation Building on Experience Partnerships Mean Ownership Chapter 2 Perspectives What is a Watershed? Life in a Dynamic Physical Environment ….. Eco ~ System Stream Corridors The Natural Tendency of Rivers (written by Jack G. Imhof) Chapter 3 Look Before You Leap Project Planning Basics STEP 1: Focus STEP 2: Research and Reconnaissance STEP 3: Evaluation and Impact Assessment STEP 4: Goal, Objectives and Targets Chapter 4 Charting the Course to Action! STEP 5: Plan, Prepare and Consult STEP 6: Implement STEP 7: Monitor and Report Chapter 5 Learning From The Past Gathering The Information Drawing Conclusions... Chapter 6 Techniques Introduction Barrier Management Barrier Modification Fishways Soil Bioengineering (written by R. Grillmayer) Live Staking Fascines Brushlayers Brushmattress Live Cribwall Willow Posts Native Material Revetment Live Rock Revetment Habitat Improvement L.U.N.K.E.R.S. Boulder Placement Half Log Cover Instream Log Cover The Sweeper Palette Cover Cabled Log Jam Channel Rehabilitation Natural Channel Reconstruction (Under Construction) Riparian Corridor Rehabilitation (Under Construction) Woody Debris Management Low Stage Weirs (Under Construction) Wing Deflectors Bibliography Bibliography Appendices Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Our Natural Areas
    The Value of Our Natural Areas A Cursory Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Grey Sauble Conservation Properties Grey Sauble Conservation Tim Lanthier 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................... 1-1 Defining and Valuating Ecosystem Services ............................................................. 1-1 Significance of Ecosystem Services ......................................................................... 1-3 Purpose of Reviewing Ecosystem Services within GSC Watershed ......................... 1-3 Background............................................................................................... 2-1 Geographic Context of this Review ........................................................................... 2-2 Land Cover Classes .................................................................................................. 2-2 Methodology and Limitations ................................................................. 3-1 Valuation Methodology ............................................................................................. 3-1 Limitations ................................................................................................................. 3-2 Ecosystem Values by Cover Type ............................................................................ 3-2 Discussion ................................................................................................ 4-1 Distribution of Ecosystem Service Values
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue 67
    THE OSPrEY A Journal Published by the Steelhead Committee Federation of Fly Fishers Dedicated to the Preservation of Wild Steelhead • Issue No. 67 • SEPTEmbEr 2010 Nottawasaga River Steelhead A Great Lakes lesson in local adaptation and naturalization by Brian P. Morrison, Fred Dobbs and Chris Atkinson — Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, Nottawasaga Steeheaders — Fisheries biologist Brian Morrison accidentally released into the Pine steelhead in the Canadian waters of the Ganaraska Region River, a Nottawasaga River tribu - of the Great Lakes proper. Shortly Conservation Authority, Fred thereafter, steelhead were making Dobbs, stewerdship services man - seasonal migrations between the ager for the Nottawasaga Valley Nottawasaga River and Georgian Conservation Authority and Chris Bay/Lake Huron; with these fish Atkinson of the Nottawasaga As early as 1903, likely resulting from the acciden - Steelheaders outline the establish - tal release of steelhead into the ment of a naturalized steelhead adult steelhead were Pine River. population in the Lake Huron documented in The life history characteristics of Basin, Ontario, Canada and how it the naturalized steelhead popula - might provide insight for re-intro - tributaries of the tions in the Great Lakes resemble ducing extirpated steelhead popu - those of anadromous forms native lations in other regions. Nottawasage River. to Pacific coastal drainages, although local populations display igratory rainbow varying life history traits. trout ( Oncorhynchus tary (Figure 1) by 1900, likely off - Continued on Page 4 mykiss ), also known spring of fish spawned from the as steelhead, were McLeod River, California. As Mintroduced into Lake Huron in 1876 The Osprey is now early as 1903 adult steelhead were when the AuSable River in documented in tributaries of the also available via Michigan was stocked with rain - Nottawasaga River, and it has been electronic delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Williams Trout: Diaries of a Small Town Lady Trevor Parsons
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 3:19 a.m. Ontario History Mary Williams Trout: Diaries of a Small Town Lady Trevor Parsons Volume 102, Number 1, Spring 2010 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1065601ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1065601ar See table of contents Publisher(s) The Ontario Historical Society ISSN 0030-2953 (print) 2371-4654 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Parsons, T. (2010). Mary Williams Trout: Diaries of a Small Town Lady. Ontario History, 102(1), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.7202/1065601ar Copyright © The Ontario Historical Society, 2010 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ 1 rchival Sources Treasures from Ontario’s Archives A Mary Williams Trout: Diaries of a Small Town Lady by Trevor Parsons, Archives Digital Project Assistant he compelling story of a small town lady, Mary Williams Trout (1847-1922) from the Town of TMeaford, on the shore of Georgian Bay, is told in twenty-six of her personal diaries, housed at the Grey County Archives. The diaries have also been scanned, transcribed, and posted online at the Grey Roots website (www.greyroots.com/troutdiaries). The earliest journal dates from the year of Confederation, 1867, and following journals document Mary’s life through her marriage, the birth of her children, through the First World Mary (Williams) Trout—her diaries War and up to two Grey County Archives chronicle small town life and develop- years before her death Grey Roots Museum & Archives ment in Meaford, Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Meaford PUC WTP Municipality: Municipality of Meaford Drinking Water System Category: Large Municipal Residential
    System Name: Meaford PUC WTP Municipality: Municipality of Meaford Drinking Water System Category: Large Municipal Residential The Municipality of Meaford is located in Grey County completely in the Grey Sauble Source Protection Area. Key features include kilometres of Georgian Bay shoreline, the Niagara Escarpment, the Bighead River and tributaries, the Bruce and Georgian Trails, substantial forests, rolling valleys, and large wetland areas. In 2011, the population was 11,100, which was an increase of 1.4% from 2006. Seasonal residents add to the population during peak periods. The main town is Meaford (population 4,524). Smaller villages include Leith, Annan, Bognor, and Woodford. The one municipal drinking water system is an intake located in the town of Meaford. No new drinking water systems are planned. Meaford water The Meaford PUC WTP is a Great Lakes (Type A) intake that is located on Nottawasaga Bay. It treatment building services approximately 4,800 people and is classified as a large municipal residential system, under Ontario Regulation 170/03, with a rated capacity of the treatment plant of 3 26,848m /day. The treatment process includes two filter beds with multimedia and backwash troughs, a flash mixer, gas chlorination disinfection, ultraviolet disinfection, and backwash wastewater treatment. The filter backwash wastewater system consists of a surge tank, a treatment clarifier and an injection of sodium metabisulphate for dechlorination. Treated backwash wastewater is discharged into the storm sewer system. Chemicals used in the treatment process include polyaluminum chloride, sodium metabisulphate and chlorine gas (Stantec 2008). Meaford WTP The raw water intake is located at a northing of 531614.37 and an easting of 4940904.72.
    [Show full text]
  • Saugeen Shores
    INITIAL SCREENING FOR SITING A DEEP GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY FOR CANADA’S USED NUCLEAR FUEL The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores INITIAL SCREENING FOR SITING A DEEP GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY FOR CANADA’S USED NUCLEAR FUEL The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores Prepared by: AECOM 300 – 300 Town Centre Boulevard 905 477 8400 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3R 5Z6 905 477 1456 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60247068-4 Date: September, 2012 The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores Initial Screening for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel AECOM Signatures Report Prepared By: Robin Frizzell, M.Sc., P.Geo Senior Geoscientist Report Reviewed By: Robert E.J. Leech, P.Geo. Practice Lead, Environment The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores Initial Screening for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Executive Summary On May 14, 2012, the Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores expressed interest in learning more about the Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s (NWMO) site selection process to find an informed and willing community to host a deep geological repository for Canada’s used nuclear fuel (NWMO, 2010). This report summarizes the findings of an initial screening, conducted by AECOM, to evaluate the potential suitability of the Town of Saugeen Shores against five screening criteria using readily available information. The purpose of the initial screening is to identify whether there are any obvious conditions that would exclude the Town of Saugeen Shores from further consideration in the site selection process. The initial screening focused on the areas within the boundaries of the Town of Saugeen Shores.
    [Show full text]
  • BCPS1-Final Report.Pdf
    Emergency Service Planning Emergency Medical Services 2020 Report Base ORH/BCPS/1 ORH/BCPS/1 June 9, June Services Final Services and Paramedic County Paramedic of Bruce Review Comprehensive Deployment Deployment Comprehensive This document has been produced by ORH for Bruce County Paramedic Services on June 09, 2020. This document can be reproduced by Bruce County Paramedic Services, subject to it being used accurately and not in a misleading context. When the document is reproduced in whole or in part within another publication or service, the full title, date and accreditation to ORH must be included. ORH is the trading name of Operational Research in Health Limited, a company registered in England with company number 2676859. ORH’s quality management system is ISO 9001:2015 certified: recognition of ORH’s dedication to maintaining high quality services for its clients. ORH’s information security management system is ISO 27001:2017 certified: evidence of ORH’s commitment to implementing international best practice with regard to data security. This document is intended to be printed double-sided. As a result, some of the pages in the document are intentionally left blank. Disclaimer The information in this report is presented in good faith using the information available to ORH at the time of preparation. It is provided on the basis that the authors of the report are not liable to any person or organization for any damage or loss which may occur in relation to taking, or not taking, action in respect of any information or advice within the document. Accreditations Other than data provided by Bruce County Paramedic Services, this report also contains data from the following sources: © 2020 HERE All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Checkup
    What Are We Doing? What You Can Do ? Where Are We? With the use of environmental indicators, Grey Sauble Conservation sta are able We are one of to monitor our watershed health. Be a Watershed Steward! 36 Conservation - Surface Water Sampling- 27 locations across the watershed are sampled 8 Grey Sauble Conservation Authorities across times a year Plant trees and shrubs along streams, lake, rivers and ponds. This will - BioMap (Biological Monitoring and Assessment Program) - Benthic samples provide shade and help keep the water cool for thriving sh species in our Ontario under are collected from 30 long-term monitoring sites throughout the watershed. watersheds. Trees and shrubs will also help prevent erosion, improve water WATERSHED the umbrella - Other Watershed Monitoring quality, clean our air by reducing emissions, clean our water, provide shade Grey Sauble organization of • Sta and volunteers record important information every time they visit to keep our environment cool and provide homes for wildlife. Report Card 2013 Conservation Conservation a stream crossing. This includes: stream crossing type and size, general Plant native species - don’t be an invader to our watershed. Watershed Ontario. description of ow (i.e. lots, some, trickle or dry), water clarity, the Decommission an unused well. Remember, an unused well can provide a presence of sh, and any other site features that may aect water quality direct pathway to our ground water system. and quantity. To date, over 4,600 crossings have been visited and eld Septic Systems need to be working properly. Septic systems can What Does This Report Card Measure? information recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour 1 the Other
    from an airport. He fired at two, hitting one and diverting grave and the bugler played the Last Post and Reveille. Tour 1 the other. Another two aircraft approached and he fired, There is a memorial to her at the St. George’s Church causing one to crash and the other to dive away. Billy parkette at Salvation Corners. Standing at the flag pole, walk east toward the entrance gate Bishop’s childhood home is now a museum located on 3rd to the water tap. Ave. West in Owen Sound. It is designated as a National Just beyond the vault lots, next to the ravine, is a grassy area Historic Site. C.B. – Companion of the Most Honourable with a few markers. This area has been referred to locally as The Carney monument is the grey stone that has Order of Bath; D.S.O. – Distinguished Service Order; M.C. “Pauper’s Field” or the “Indigent area.” It was determined in been carved to look like stones. Richard Carney – Military Cross; D.F.C. – Distinguished Flying Cross; E.D. 1858 that Block F of the People’s Cemetery was to be used came to Sydenham around 1843. He built a log – Efficiency Decoration. for those who could not pay for their burial, or for house on Marsh Street (2nd Ave. “strangers” who died within the limits of the town. East) and was named “Collector” for the The large white monument in front of the Bishop marker is port in 1844. He was also appointed for the Frost family. John Frost (1869) served as mayor of In this grassy area you will find several markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Grey Huron Perth Elgin Middlesex Oxford-Norfolk
    South West Local Health Integration Network Legend Tobermory Ü Ü Cities/Towns NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA First Nations X Local Health Integration Network office location u" Hospitals Major Highway Highway Lions Head Sub-LHIN boundaries u" Census Subdivisions South West LHIN boundary NEYAASHIINIGMIING 27 0 12.5 25 50 KM Pike Bay Ü Last Updated: 8/29/2014 SOUTH BRUCE PENINSULA Ü Big Bay North Simcoe Muskoka OliphantÜ u"Ü Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation Ü Wiarton Kemble Ü Ü Sauble Falls Clavering Ü LindenwoodHogg Ü Sauble Beach North Ü GEORGIAN BLUFFS Sauble Beach Ü East Linton Ü Ü Ü Balmy Beach Leith Ü Ü Park Head Annan Meafor"d Ü Saugeen First Nation OWEN SOUND u Springmount Ü " SAUGEEN 29 Ü u Ü Jackson MEAFORD Ü Allenford Ü Ü Alvanley Rockford Clarksburg Elsinore Ü Ü Kilsyth Ü Bognor u" Southampton Walters Falls Ü Keady Ü THE BLUE MOUNTAINS Port Elgin Ü SAUGEEN SHORES Grimston Ü G rr e y ARRAN-ELDERSLIE Holland Centre CHATSWORTH Ü Berkeley Ü Mooresburg Ü Chesley Markdale B r u c e Ü Ü B r u c e Inverhuron u" Scone u" GREY HIGHLANDS Ü Kinhuron KINCARDINE WEST GREY Ü Ü Irish Lake Ü Ü Elmwood Slade Ceylon Ü Huron Ridge Ü Ü" u Cargill Ü Kincardine Priceville Ü Allan Park Millarton Ü Ü Durha"m BROCKTON u Ü HANOVER Ü Bervie Walkerton Ü " Pine River " u Ü u Lurgan Beach Carlsruhe Ü Ü Point Clark Ü Ripley HURON-KINLOSS Ayton Ü SOUTH BRUCE Central Belmore Ü Central West Ü HOWICK ASHFIELD-COLBORNE-WAWANOSH u"Wingham Ü Ü Wroxeter Fordwich Nile Ü NORTH HURON MORRIS-TURNBERRY Ü Carlow Ü Kurtzville Ü Ü Molesworth " Saltford Gowanstown Ü GODuERICH Ü EthelÜ Listoweu"l H u rr o n NORTH PERTH Waterloo Wellington CENTRAL HURON Ü Holmesville Ü Atwood Ü Clintou"n DonegalÜ Toronto Central HURON EAST Monkton Ü Newton Ü Harpurhey Ü Ü Seaforth Ü Brodhagen Ü Ü " Millbank Egmondville u Ü Bornholm Poole Ü BrunnerÜ Mississauga Halton Rostock Ü Ü BLUEWATER WEST PERTH PERTH EAST MitchelWl artburg Ü Gads Hill Ü Amulree Ü P e rr tt h Sebringville Ü Ü SOUTH HURON Ü Dashwood Ü STRu"ATFORD Exeteu"r Shakespeare Woodham Ü Ü Huron Park Ü St.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Is My Medicine-Climate Change FN.Pdf
    “My Food is My Medicine, My Medicine is My Food” First Nations and Metis People of Grey and Bruce: a forage into traditional food use, climate change and health. Grey Bruce Health Unit Acknowledgements This report was prepared for the Grey Bruce Health Unit by Krista Youngblood, Master of Public Health Graduate Student, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. The practicum placement was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. The views expressed in this report are those of the Author and not necessarily represent those of the Grey Bruce Health Unit, the University of Waterloo or the Canadian Institute of Health Research. This project developed under the guidance of Alanna Leffley, Sr. Epidemiologist at the Grey Bruce Health Unit. Alanna was a valuable sounding board and provided thoughtful criticism that assisted my work greatly. Instrumental to this investigation were the people who were willing to share their stories with me. I thank you all, and look forward to seeing you again as I truly hope our paths will cross again. I have learned a great deal about the First People of this land, and the Metis Nation that was born from the merging of two worlds. I simply cannot express the gratitude I feel for the opportunity to learn so much and for feeling so welcome in your midst. Thank you to everyone who shared your stories with me. I simply do not have the words to express my gratitude and how much it meant to me personally. A special thank you to Victoria Serda, Lori Kewaquom, Lenore Keshig, Mary Miller, Michelle Desjardine, and Dee Miller for assisting me so willingly in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile
    COMMUNITY PROFILE SET YOUR SIGHTS ON MEAFORD Welcome to the Municipality of Meaford, on the southern shore of Georgian Bay. The Municipality of Meaford is a fascinating, four-season destination that has it all: fresh local food, unique shopping, nature at your doorstep, a beautiful waterfront, and hundreds of local charms and amenities awaiting your discovery. Our charming, historic downtown district features Meaford Hall – a restored 330-seat theatre, concert and cinema venue, plus distinctive boutiques, eclectic eateries and services of all kinds. Just a few minutes away, you’ll find acres of rolling countryside, charming historic villages, sandy beaches and unspoiled natural areas. TABLE OF CONTENTS Reasons To Invest ............................................................................... 4-5 Location ................................................................................................... 6 County of Grey .................................................................................. 7-8 Municipality of Meaford ........................................................................ 9 Population Trend ................................................................................. 10 Affordability ........................................................................................ 11 Real Estate Activity ............................................................................. 12 What Makes Meaford Unique ........................................................... 13 Lifestyle - Premier Parks ....................................................................
    [Show full text]