DOCSLIB.ORG

A Summary of Design, Policies and Operational Characteristics for Shared Bicycle/Bus Lanes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Summary of Design, Policies and Operational Characteristics for Shared Bicycle/Bus Lanes A Summary of Design, Policies and Operational Characteristics for Shared Bicycle/Bus Lanes Contract No. BDK85 977-32 Final Report 07/2012 i Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA; Credit: John S. Allen A Summary of Design, Policies and Operational Characteristics for Shared Bicycle/Bus Lanes Project No. BDK85 977-32 Prepared By Edward L. Hillsman, Ph.D., Senior Research Associate, Transportation Demand Management Sara J. Hendricks, AICP, Senior Research Associate, Transportation Demand Management JoAnne K. Fiebe, MUCD, LEED AP, Research Assistant Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620-5375 Joel Volinski, National Center for Transit Research Program Director Philip L. Winters, Transportation Demand Management Program Director Prepared For The Florida Department of Transportation Research Center 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Project Manager: David C. O’Hagan, P.E. Co-Project Manager: Mary Anne Koos July 2012 Final Report ii Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program and the Florida Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government and the Florida Department of Transportation assume no liability for the contents or use thereof. iii Metric Conversion SI* Modern Metric Conversion Factors as provided by the Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/aaa/metricp.htm Length SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km Area SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL in2 square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 Length SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL mm millimeters 0.039 inches in m meters 3.28 feet ft m meters 1.09 yards yd km kilometers 0.621 miles mi Area SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL mm2 square millimeters 0.0016 square inches in2 m2 square meters 10.764 square feet ft2 m2 square meters 1.195 square yards yd2 ha hectares 2.47 acres ac km2 square kilometers 0.386 square miles mi2 *SI is the symbol for the International System of Units. Appropriate rounding should be made to comply with Section 4 of ASTM E380. iv Technical Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A Summary of Design, Policies and Operational Characteristics for July 2012 Shared Bicycle/Bus Lanes 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Edward L Hillsman, Sara J Hendricks, AICP, JoAnne Fiebe NCTR 77937/BDK85 977-32 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) National Center for Transit Research Center for Urban Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. University of South Florida FDOT BDK85 977-32 4202 E Fowler Avenue, CUT 100, Tampa, FL 33620-5375 U.S. DOT DTRS98-G-0032 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research and Innovative Technology Administration Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation, Mail Code RDT-30 02/17/11-04/31/12 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, Room E33, Washington, DC 20590-0001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Florida Department of Transportation Research Center 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30, Tallahassee, FL 32399 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report contains the results of an investigation of the design and operation of shared bicycle/bus lanes in municipalities in the United States and other countries. These lanes are designated for use by public transit buses, bicycles, and usually also for right-turning vehicles. Some municipalities may also allow use of these lanes by taxis and delivery vehicles. The purpose of such lanes is to provide a time advantage to public transit service by taking the buses out of the general traffic flow and into a designated lane. Where constrained right-of-way prevents provision of a separate bicycle lane, the intent is to allow bicycles to use the designated bus lane. This is to provide a more direct route for bicyclists, provide greater level of service to bicyclists and provide some degree of space separation between general traffic and bicyclists for their greater safety and comfort. However, this combined use raises many issues of compatibility of bicycles and buses sharing the same road space. The limited available research on the subject of shared bicycle/bus lanes includes informative investigations from the Minneapolis Public Works Department, Minnesota; the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, Pennsylvania; the City of Ottawa, Canada, the Department for Transport of the United Kingdom and from Austroads, Sydney, Australia. Investigators compiled a list of shared bicycle/bus lanes in cities in the United States and Canada, including facility attributes that are presented in an appendix. Researchers found very few examples of state-level guidance on shared bicycle/bus lanes but more examples at the local and regional levels. These are provided in the report. Through surveys and interviews, the shared bicycle/bus lanes from four cities in the United States were selected for in-depth examination and were developed into case studies: Ocean City, Maryland; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Washington, D.C. As a result of this investigation, an identification and discussion of the contextual factors, design variables, and tools for planning and implementing shared bicycle/bus lanes is presented. The report provides recommendations for further needed research. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Bicycle, Bus, Congestion, Public transportation, Shared bicycle/bus lanes, Bicycle safety, Preferential lanes 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 167 v Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the National Center for Transit Research at the Center for Urban Trans- portation Research, College of Engineering, University of South Florida, through the sponsorship of the Florida Department of Transportation. FDOT Project Manager David C. O’Hagan, P.E., State Roadway Design Engineer FDOT Co-Project Manager Mary Anne Koos, Special Projects Coordinator, Roadway Design Office Contributors and Reviewers Study authors would like to thank several transportation professionals from the U.K. for their kind assistance, including Iain Macbeth, Alex Sully, Richard Armitage, John Lee, Adrian Lord, Derek Lawlor, and Tony Russell. At the beginning of the study, John Ciccarelli provided the research team with a spreadsheet that listed shared bicycle/bus lanes, which the research team checked, augmented, and expanded into the inventory that appears as Appendix A. Tony Garcia of the Street Plans Collaborative and Transit Miami blog in Miami also provided helpful comments and suggestions at the beginning of the study. Diane Quigley and Amy Datz from FDOT also conducted a detailed review of the report. Finally, the study authors interviewed and surveyed numerous persons in cities where there are shared bicycle/bus lanes. The authors greatly appreciate the time and information made available by these persons, who are identified in footnotes throughout the report. Joel Volinski, Program Director for the National Center for Transit Research at CUTR, Jay Goodwill, Senior Research Associate at CUTR, and Philip L. Winters, Director of CUTR’s Transportation Demand Management Program, reviewed a draft of this report and provided useful advice for improving it. Nevine Georggi provided helpful assistance in report formatting. vi Executive Summary A shared bicycle/bus lane (SBBL) is a traffic lane dedicated for exclusive use by buses, bicyclists, and, usually, right-turning vehicles. SBBLs have been implemented in municipalities where there are street right-of-way constraints and where municipalities seek ways to accommodate buses and bicycles for better multimodal service. There were three objectives of this study, conducted for the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT): Identify and describe the state of the art and practice in the design, implementation, operation, and use of shared bicycle/bus lanes (SBBL) Evaluate the benefits and barriers to implementing SBBLs Develop recommendations for Florida to consider the use of SBBLs on the State Highway System. Through the literature review, surveys of chief contacts within municipalities that have SBBLs, and follow-up telephone interviews, information was collected about SBBL design, operation, and functional effectiveness. For four municipalities with SBBLs, there was sufficient information to develop and present case study narratives. These were Ocean City, Maryland; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Washington, D.C. For the other host municipalities, additional comparative data about SBBLs were collected, where available. The main report summarizes findings of relevant previous research, available SBBL planning and design guidelines of localities, states, and other nations, identification of those background conditions that remain fixed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2. Basic Roadway Improvements the Street System Provides the Basic Network for Bicycle Travel
    Figure 2-1: Many low-volume resi- YES dential streets need only the most basic improve- ments to make them more ridable. 2. Basic Roadway Improvements The street system provides the basic network for bicycle travel. Other ele- ments (e.g., bike lanes and paths) supplement this system. To make most streets work for bicyclists, basic improvements may be needed. Such things as safe railroad crossings, traffic signals that work for bicyclists, and street networks that connect benefit bicyclists and make more bicycle trips possible and likely. 2.1 Roadway types While the most basic improvements are appropriate for all categories of street, some improvements are most appropriate for certain categories. In a typical community, streets types range from quiet residential streets, to minor collector streets, to major arterials, and highways or expressways. Figure 2-2: Long blocks and a lack 2.1.1 Residential streets of connectivity On quiet residential streets with little traffic and slow speeds (fig. 2-1), make trips longer bicyclists and motorists can generally co-exist with little difficulty. Such and discourage streets seldom need bike lanes. Only the most basic improvements may bicycling for pur- poseful trips. be required, for instance: • bicycle-safe drainage grates • proper sight distance at intersections • smooth pavement and proper maintenance One additional factor that may need attention is connectivity. Providing bicycle linkages between residential streets and nearby commercial areas or adjacent neighborhoods can significantly improve bicycling conditions. In many communi- 2-1 Wisconsin Bicycle Facility Design Handbook ties, newer parts of town tend to have dis- Figure 2-3: Bicycle- continuous street networks that require bicy- pedestrian connec- clists, pedestrians, and motorists to travel a tions like that long distance to get to a nearby destination shown can provide (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Madison Avenue Dual Exclusive Bus Lane Demonstration, New York City
    HE tV 18.5 U M T A-M A-06-0049-84-4 a A37 DOT-TSC-U MTA-84-18 no. DOT- Department SC- U.S T of Transportation UM! A— 84-18 Urban Mass Transportation Administration Madison Avenue Dual Exclusive Bus Lane Demonstration - New York City j ™nsportat;on JUW 4 198/ Final Report May 1984 UMTA Technical Assistance Program Office of Management Research and Transit Service UMTA/TSC Project Evaluation Series NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. - POT- Technical Report Documentation Page TS . 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient s Catalog No. 'A'* tJMTA-MA-06-0049-84-4 'Z'i-I £ 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date MADISON AVENUE DUAL EXCLUSIVE BUS LANE DEMONSTRATION. May 1984 NEW YORK CITY 6. Performing Organization Code DTS-64 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Authors) J. Richard^ Kuzmyak : DOT-TSC-UMTA-84-18 9^ Performing Organization Name ond Address DEPARTMENT OF 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) COMSIS Corporation* transportation UM427/R4620 11501 Georgia Avenue, Suite 312 11. Controct or Grant No. DOT-TSC-1753 Wheaton, MD 20902 JUN 4 1987 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report Urban Mass Transportation Admi ni strati pg LIBRARY August 1980 - May 1982 Office of Technical Assistance 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Bikesharing and Bicycle Safety Department of Transportation MTI Report 12-02MTI Report
    MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 Transportation and California Bikesharing and Bicycle Safety Department of Transportation MTI ReportMTI 12-02 MTI Report 12-54 December 2012 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2016) Michael Townes* (TE 2017) be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Senior Vice President Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. Transit Sector, HNTB Transportation Centers Program, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Vice Chair Anne Canby (TE 2017) Will Kempton (TE 2016) Bud Wright (Ex-Officio) Hill & Knowlton, Inc. Director Executive Director Executive Director OneRail Coalition Transportation California American Association of State The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Honorary Chair, Honorable Bill Highway and Transportation Officials transportation modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Version of the Questions (Updated Regularly): Q: Will Motorcyclists Be Able to Lane Share Anywhere?
    Online version of the questions (updated regularly): https://laneshareoregon.com/#faqs Q: Will motorcyclists be able to lane share anywhere? No. Only under the limited conditions proposed in the bill, summarized below. Traffic on the road: must be stopped, or moving at 10 miles per hour or less The rider: may travel no more than 10 miles per hour faster than traffic must not impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic must safely merge with traffic, if traffic speed exceeds 10 miles per hour Riders cannot lane share: between a traffic lane and the curb and bicycle lane (on either side) between a traffic lane and a row of parked vehicles (on either side) in a school zone Riders should also use common sense when lane sharing, and err on the side of caution: "If you can't fit, don't split". The California Highway Patrol has defined guidelines for safe lane sharing. Q: Is lane sharing dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists? Not lane sharing under HB2314. HB2314 legalizes lane sharing only on roads with posted speeds of 50 mph or greater: highways and freeways. Most people don’t walk or bicycle on or across these roads, even if they’re allowed to. Also, under HB2314 motorcycles may not lane-share on the right hand side of the right hand lane, next to the curb, shoulder or bicycle lane. HB2314 was written this way to give additional protection to pedestrians and bicyclists. Commenting on the specific constraints in HB2314, Portland’s Bureau of Transportation wrote “our most serious concerns of threats to pedestrian and bike safety are addressed”.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review- Resource Guide for Separating Bicyclists from Traffic
    Literature Review Resource Guide for Separating Bicyclists from Traffic July 2018 0 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. FHWA-SA-18-030 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Literature Review: Resource Guide for Separating Bicyclists from Traffic 2018 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Bill Schultheiss, Rebecca Sanders, Belinda Judelman, and Jesse Boudart (TDG); REPORT NO. Lauren Blackburn (VHB); Kristen Brookshire, Krista Nordback, and Libby Thomas (HSRC); Dick Van Veen and Mary Embry (MobyCON). 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME & ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Toole Design Group, LLC VHB 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 8300 Boone Boulevard, Suite 300 DTFH61-16-D-00005 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Vienna, VA 22182 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE FHWA 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The Task Order Contracting Officer's Representative (TOCOR) for this task was Tamara Redmon.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Concrete Pavements with Tied Shoulders Or Widened Lanes Bert E
    39 19. K. Y. Kung. A New Method in Correlation Study of vision of Pavements. Proc., 3rd International Con­ Pavement Deflection and Cracking. Proc., 2nd In­ ference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, ternational Conference on Structural Design of 1972, pp. 1188-1205. Asphalt Pavements, 1967, pp. 1037-1046. 20. P. H. Leger and P. Autret. The Use of Deflection Publication of this paper sponsored by Committee on Pavement Condi­ Measurements for the Structural Design and Super- tion Evaluation. Evaluation of Concrete Pavements With Tied Shoulders or Widened Lanes Bert E. Colley, Claire G. Ball, and Pichet Arriyavat, Portland Cement Association Field and laboratory pavements were instrumented and load tested to reducing pavement performance, Because of this prob­ evaluate the effect of widened lanes, concrete shoulders, and slab thick­ lem, several states have installed costly longitudinal ness on measured strains and deflectfons. Eight slabs were tested in the and transverse drainage systems. Thus, concrete field and two in the laboratory. Pavement slabs were 203, 229, or 254 shoulders and widened lanes have the potential for curing mm (8, 9, or 10 in) thick. Other major design variables included the width of lane widening, the presence or absence of dowels or of a con­ many drainage problems as well as providing additional crete shoulder, joint spacing, and the type of shoulder joint construc­ slab strength. tion. Generally, there was good agreement between measured strains and Many design features contribute to pavement life. values calculated by using Westergaard's theoretical equations. Concrete The effect of some of these features can be evaluated shoulders were effective in reducing the magnitude of measured strains analytically.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Network Data Catalog
    Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Network Data Catalog Created by Institute for Transportation Research and Education Bicycle and Pedestrian Program For North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation January 21, 2016 JANUARY 2016 PBIN DATA CATALOG PBIN Data Catalog Each dataset provides a consistent set of attribute fields on existing bicycle, pedestrian, and shared-use path data for use in asset management as well as proposed data for use in planning and project development by PGI awarded communities. Where applicable, fields or attributes marked with an asterisk (*) are required data for NCDOT Planning Grant Initiative (PGI) communities to collect and/or update as a condition of award. PGI communities should consider including additional fields or attributes from the Data Catalog when inventorying focus areas or corridors, as identified through the plan development process. The data catalog is broken up into three sections: 1. BICYCLE ASSETS The Bike_Fac_Linear feature class includes polyline data on existing and proposed facilities such as bike lanes, bike routes, bicycle boulevards, and paved shoulders. It also includes information on surface condition, facility width, slope, and rumble strips. The Bike_Fac_Point feature class includes polyline data on existing and proposed facilities such as bike parking, crossing improvement, bike boxes, bike share kiosks, and bike detection loops. It also includes information on bicycle-oriented signage and hazardous grates. It also includes information on surface condition, facility width, slope, and rumble strips. The Ped_Fac_Linear feature class includes polyline data on existing and proposed facilities such as sidewalks and other types of footpaths. It includes information on material, facility width, buffer, buffer width and slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Splitting Tips
    Sven Miller, Commander Contact: Fran Clader Office of Community Outreach & Media Relations Director of Communications 601 North 7th Street, Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 843-3310 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 27, 2018 18-27 CHP ANNOUNCES LANE SPLITTING TIPS SACRAMENTO, Calif. – Lane splitting is a privilege enjoyed by California motorcyclists. With this freedom comes a greater responsibility for motorcyclists and drivers to share the road and create a safer highway environment. In 2016, Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. signed California Assembly Bill 51, which defined motorcycle lane splitting and authorized the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to develop educational safety tips. Through a deliberative process and in consultation with the California Department of Motor Vehicles, the California Department of Transportation, the Office of Traffic Safety, and several motorcycle safety organizations, the CHP has finalized lane splitting tips. “Although lane splitting is legal in California, motorcyclists are encouraged to exercise extreme caution when traveling between lanes of stopped or slow-moving traffic,” said CHP Commissioner Warren Stanley. “Every rider has the ultimate responsibility for their own decision making and safety.” These general safety tips are provided to assist you when riding; however, they are not guaranteed to keep you safe: • Consider the total environment when you are lane splitting (this includes the width of lanes, the size of surrounding vehicles, as well as current roadway, weather, and lighting conditions). • Danger increases at greater speed differentials. • Danger increases as overall speed increases. • It is typically safer to split between the far left lanes than between the other lanes of traffic. • Try to avoid lane splitting next to large vehicles (big rigs, buses, motorhomes, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Role of High-Occupancy-Vehicle Lanes Highway Construction Management In
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1280 131 Role of High-Occupancy-Vehicle Lanes In• Highway Construction Management ALLAN E. PINT, CHARLEEN A. ZIMMER, AND FRANCIS E. LOETTERLE The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) is con­ 3. How has construction affected use of the HOV lane? structing 1-394 along the portion of US-12 that extends from 4. What was the role of the HOV lane in traffic management do\\lntown MinneapolL5 to the suburb of Wayzata. When com­ during construction? pleted, I-394 will have high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes. 5. How has the HOV lane affected the highway construction Mn/DOT builr a temporary HOV lane along US-12 before con­ structing 1-394 to introduce th , HOV lane concept to commuters project? and to improve capacity during construction. Mn/DOT and the FHW A have been conducting an evaluation of this temporary HOV lane. Phase I evaluated operation in an arterial highway FUTURE 1-394 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM environment before construction. Phase II evaluated operation and use of the HOV lane during highway construction. Five key When completed, 1-394 will have two mixed traffic lanes in issues were addressed in the Phase II evaluation: (a) what can each direction and two lanes for high-occupancy vehicles (3 be learned about the design and operation of HOV lanes, (b) mi of separated reversible lanes and 8 mi of concurrent flow who uses HOV lanes and what factors cause people to choose diamond lanes). I-394 is being built along the alignment of carpooling or the bus over driving alone, (c) how has con truction existing US-12, from downtown Minneapolis to the third-ring affected use of the HOV lane, (d) what was the role of the HOV lane in construction traffic management, and (e) how has the suburban municipality of Wayzata, 11 mi to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • PBOT Traffic Design Manual Volume 1
    Traffic Design Manual Volume 1: Permanent Traffic Control and Design CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON January 2020 Updated June 2021 0 of 135 Table of Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 1 Permanent Traffic Control Signs ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Regulatory Signs ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Warning Signs .................................................................................................................................. 17 1.3 Guide Signs....................................................................................................................................... 21 2 Pavement Markings ................................................................................................................................. 31 2.1 Centerlines ........................................................................................................................................ 31 2.2 Lane Widths ...................................................................................................................................... 33 2.3 Turn
    [Show full text]
  • Civitas Measure Directory 10 Years of Civitas from Aalborg to Zagreb
    CIVITAS MEASURE DIRECTORY 10 YEARS OF CIVITAS FROM AALBORG TO ZAGREB A REFERENCE GUIDE TO SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTED BY EUROPEAN CITIES BETWEEN 2002 AND 2012 About CIVITAS The CIVITAS Initiative (“City-Vitality-Sustainability”, or “Cleaner and Better Transport in Cities”) was launched in 2002. Its fundamental aim is to support cities to introduce ambitious transport measures and policies towards sustainable urban mobility. The goal of CIVITAS is to achieve a significant shift in the modal split towards sustainable transport, an objective reached through encouraging both innovative technology and policy-based strategies. In the first phase of the project (2002 to 2006), 19 cities participated in four research and demonstration projects; and in CIVITAS II (2005 to 2009), 17 cities participated across a further four projects. The initiative has just reached the end of its third phase, CIVITAS Plus (2008 to 2013), in which 25 cities were working together on five collaborative projects. In 2012, the CIVITAS Plus II phase was launched, with seven European cities and one non-European city collaborating across two new projects. In total, more than 60 European cities have been co-funded by the European Commission to implement innovative measures in clean urban transport, an investment volume of well over EUR 300 million. But CIVITAS does not stop there. The so-called demonstration cities are part of the larger CIVITAS Forum network, which comprises more than 200 cities committed to implementing and integrating sustainable urban mobility measures. By signing a non-binding voluntary agreement known as the CIVITAS Declaration, cities and their citizens benefit from the accumulated know-how, experience and lessons learned of every participant.
    [Show full text]
  • Freewheeling12-SCREE
    These bags have many imitators but Inner city cycles Karrimor is the original. Models include D Iberian pannier ( top of the range) D Standard rear panniers, available in red nylon or green cotton canvas D Univer­ TIie one stop touring shop sal pannier. Usable as front or rear bags./ D Front pannier in red nylon or green cotton canvas D Bardale and Bartlet handlebar bags D Pannier stuff sacks D Front and rear pannier racks D Re­ bikes are always available. Other items placement parts and repairs available. stocked are D Safety gear, helmets, C1cleTour vests, flags D Camping accessories D Bicycle accessories D Racks D At Inner City we build most of our Parkas and Capes . In fact anything you touring bicycles to order. Seldom two need to make your bicycle expedition bicycles are the same as each person has an enjoyable experience you will pro­ their own requirements. Our Cycle Tour bably find at Inner City Cycles. bicycles are not just another production machine. OPTION TWO • Price $320. Pt1dtlymt1de This bicycle is the ideal touring machine for a moderate financial outlay. Wide range gearing is made possible by the addition of Shimano 600 gears. Specifica­ tion: D Frame sizes as for option 1 also with guarantee D Alloy handle bars and recessed bolt stem D Cloth tape D Sugino or Suntour cotterless chain wheel set. Ring sizes 36-52 D Alloy We stock a wide range of quality Paddy­ pedals with reflectors D Shimano 600 EX made equipment made especially for front derailleur, 600 GS (long arm) rear Australian conditions.
    [Show full text]