Marys River Watershed Preliminary Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marys River Watershed Preliminary Assessment Marys River Watershed Preliminary Assessment Prepared by Ecosystems Northwest Corvallis, OR for The Marys River Watershed Council Philomath, OR April 1999 Contributing authors Tasks Kim Mattson Project management / Fish and wildlife John Runyon History Sam Fernald Water quality Andy Gallagher Soils Rebecca Johnson Social Kai Snyder GIS Scott Eden Fish and wildlife Robert Zybach History ii Marys River Preliminary Watershed Assessment Ecosystems Northwest Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................V INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1: WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ........................................................................ 2 LOCATION.................................................................................................................................... 2 THE W EST SLOPE OF THE WILLAMETTE BASIN................................................................................... 2 THREE CHARACTERISTIC AREAS...................................................................................................... 2 LAND USE, OWNERSHIP, AND POPULATION....................................................................................... 4 SUB-BASINS WITHIN THE WATERSHED............................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2: HISTORICAL CONDITIONS......................................................................................11 THE KALAPUYAN LANDSCAPE: PRE-COLUMBIAN–1845.......................................................................11 AMERICAN PIONEERS: 1846–1879 .................................................................................................14 TRANSITION TO MODERN TIMES: 1880–1940 ...................................................................................16 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................19 CHAPTER 3: WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY..........................................................................20 WATER QUALITY BACKGROUND......................................................................................................20 WHAT IS THE 303(D) LIST? ............................................................................................................24 MARYS RIVER WATERS ON 303(D) LIST...........................................................................................25 MARYS RIVER WATER QUALITY ......................................................................................................25 MUDDY CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES WATER QUALITY ...........................................................................30 ROCK CREEK WATER QUALITY.......................................................................................................33 OTHER RELEVANT WATER QUALITY STUDIES IN THE W ILLAMETTE BASIN ..............................................36 WITHDRAWALS ............................................................................................................................36 GROUNDWATER QUALITY ..............................................................................................................40 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................41 CHAPTER 4: AQUATIC AND TERRESTRIAL HABITAT.................................................................42 FISH DIVERSITY AND SENSITIVE SPECIES .........................................................................................42 FISH-BEARING WATERS.................................................................................................................48 STREAM CONDITIONS....................................................................................................................48 CULVERTS AND FISH BARRIERS......................................................................................................54 RIPARIAN ZONES AND W ETLANDS ...................................................................................................56 SENSITIVE, NON-FISH SPECIES ......................................................................................................57 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................62 CHAPTER 5: SOIL QUALITY AND LAND HEALTH........................................................................63 SOIL GROUPS ..............................................................................................................................63 LOSS OF PRODUCTIVE LANDS TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................63 SOIL EROSION AND DELIVERY TO STREAMS ......................................................................................64 MASS EROSION............................................................................................................................65 FACTORS INFLUENCING SOIL EROSION............................................................................................66 STREAMBANK EROSION.................................................................................................................68 SEDIMENT SOURCES AND DELIVERY ................................................................................................69 FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES ........................................................................................................70 FOREST ROADS ...........................................................................................................................71 LIVESTOCK ..................................................................................................................................73 GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS TO AID WATERSHED MANAGEMENT............................................................74 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................74 CHAPTER 6: SOCIOCONOMICS ...................................................................................................76 ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS........................................................................................................76 Ecosystems Northwest Marys River Preliminary Watershed Assessment iii POPULATION GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT PRESSURES.....................................................................83 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES AND USE IN THE MARYS RIVER WATERSHED.............................................86 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................87 CHAPTER 7: PRIORITIZATION OF ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................89 HISTORICAL ................................................................................................................................89 WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY .....................................................................................................89 AQUATIC AND TERRESTRIAL HABITAT ..............................................................................................90 SOILS.........................................................................................................................................90 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS...............................................................................................91 RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................................92 ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS TO REMOVE UNCERTAINTIES....................................................................92 MONITORING TO TRACK PROBLEMS AND ASSESS CHANGE..................................................................93 PROJECTS TO ENHANCE WATERSHED CONDITION AND FUNCTION........................................................93 EDUCATION AND ADVOCACY ..........................................................................................................93 APPENDIX 1: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY, CARTO-BIBLIOGRAPHY, AND RELATED INTERNET RESOURCES................................................................................................................................95 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ...........................................................................................................95 CARTO-BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................114 INTERNET SITES .........................................................................................................................116 APPENDIX 2: PHOTOS...............................................................................................................118 PHOTO 3A: 1937 AERIAL PHOTO OF THE CONFLUENCE OF MARYS RIVER AND MUDDY CREEK.................118 PHOTO 3B: 1956 AERIAL PHOTO OF THE CONFLUENCE OF MARYS RIVER AND MUDDY CREEK . ...............118 PHOTO 3C: 1994 ORTHOPHOTO OF THE CONFLUENCE OF MARYS RIVER AND MUDDY CREEK. ................118 PHOTO 4 : A CONTROVERSIAL PHOTO ABOUT WHETHER SALMON EVER USED THE MARYS RIVER .............119 APPENDIX 3: FIGURES NOT IMBEDDED IN TEXT......................................................................120
Recommended publications
  • Terrestrial Hibernation in the Northern Cricket Frog, Acris Cnepitans
    1240 Terrestrial hibernation in the northern cricket frog, Acris cnepitans Jason T. hwin, Jon P. Gostanzo, and Rlchard E. Lee, Jr. Abstract: We used laboratory experiments and field observations to explore overwintering in the northern cricket frog, Acris crepitans, in southern Ohio and Indiana. Cricket frogs died within 24 h when submerged in simulated pond warer that was anoxic or hypoxic, but lived 8-10 days when the water was oxygenatedinitially. Habitat selectionexperiments indicated that cricket frogs prefer a soil substrate to water as temperature decreasesfrom 8 to 2"C. These data suggested that cricket frogs hibernate terrestrially. However, unlike sympatric hylids, this species does not tolerate extensive freezing: only 2 of 15 individuals survived freezing in the -0.8 to -2.6"C range (duration 24-96 h). Cricket fiogs supercooledwhen dry (mean supercoolingpoint -5.5"C; range from -4.3 to -6.8'C), but were easily inoculated by external ice at temperatures between -0.5 and -0.8"C. Our data suggested that cricket frogs hibernate terrestrially but are not freeze tolerant, are not fossorial, and are incapable of supercooling in the presence of external ice. Thus we hypothesized that cricket frogs must hibernate in terrestrial sites that adequately protect against freezing. Indeed, midwinter surveys revealed cricket frogs hibernating in crayfish burrows and cracks of the pond bank, where wet soils buff'ered against extensive freezing of the soil. R6sum6 : Nous avons proc6d6 i des expdriences en laboratoire et A des observations sur le terrain pour 6tudier le sort de la Rainettegrillon, Acris crepitans,en hiver dans le sud de I'Ohio et de I'Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Pack Dog Titles 2017-0119
    Working Pack Dog issued number registeredname owners regnum sire sireregnum dam damregnum 1 Shadak’s Sastan Taka Keith & Lynne Hurrell WC786190 Lobito's Caballero of Kiska WC257803 Shadak's Shukeenyuk WB579440 2 Shadak’s Tich-A-Luk Keith & Lynne Hurrell 3 Shadak’s Artic Sonrise Keith & Lynne Hurrell WB650563 Pak N Pulls Kingak WA764822 Pak N Pulls Arctic Shadow WA524342 4 Arken’s Nakina Cheryll Arkins 5 Shadak’s Wicked Winter Keith & Lynne Hurrell WD543192 Witch 6 Czarina Anastasia Nicolle Pat Paulding WD625393 Wyvern Alyeska Arkah of Jo- WB547353 Wyvern's Heather WC990172 Jan 7 Kamai’s Alaluk Of Inuit Ralph Coppola WD686604 Inuit's Driftwood WD252511 Kamai's Artica of Inuit WC738866 8 Suak’s Brite Artic Dawn Paula & Louis Perdoni WE020543 Wyvern's Invictus WD609383 Suak's Aksoah of Brandy WD222764 9 Sno King’s Northern Light Jackai Szuhai WD932145 Tigara's Apollo of Totemtok WC367473 Tamerak's Mist of Cougar Cub WC980864 10 Nicole Ohtahyon Jackai Szuhai WC010823 Athabascan King WB386373 Nicole of Athabasca WB495979 11 Storm King Of Berkeley Gale Castro WE266354 12 Maska Bull Of Rushing Waters Jeff Rolfson WD233138 Gypsy King WC791246 Cricket Lady Under the Pine WC423794 13 Avalanche At Snow Castle Helen Brockmeyer WD598136 Aristeed's Frost Shadow WB496698 Storm Kloud's Happy Nequivik WC510192 14 Maska’s Sure-Foot Sheba Jeff Rolfson WE707239 Maska Bull of Rushing Waters WD233138 Beauty Queen of Swamp WD701391 Hollow 15 Hi-De-Ho’s Royal Heritage Of Sue Worley WE333340 Northwood's Lord Kipnuk WB475489 Eldor's Starr Von Hi-De-Ho WD490983
    [Show full text]
  • Greenberry Irrigation District Proposed Water Service Contract Draft Environmental Assessment
    PROPOSED WATER SERVICE CONTRACT GREENBERRY IRRIGATION DISTRICT WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, BENTON COUNTY, OREGON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION LOWER COLUMBIA AREA OFFICE PORTLAND, OREGON FEBRUARY 2007 MISSION STATEMENTS The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our nations natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments of island communities. _________________________________________ The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. PROPOSED WATER-SERVICE CONTRACT GREENBERRY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BENTON COUNTY, WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, OREGON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION LOWER COLUMBIA AREA OFFICE PORTLAND, OR PREPARED ON THE BEHALF OF GREENBERRY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BENTON COUNTY, OR BY CRAVEN CONSULTANT GROUP, TIGARD, OR FEBRUARY 2007 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ACOE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers BA biological assessment BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior cfs cubic feet per second District Greenberry Irrigation District DSL Oregon Department of State Lands EA environmental assessment EFH essential fish habitat EO Executive Order ESA Endangered Species Act ESA Endangered Species Act ESU evolutionarily significant units FWS US Fish
    [Show full text]
  • Dr John Glen Interviewed by Paul Merchant
    NATIONAL LIFE STORIES AN ORAL HISTORY OF BRITISH SCIENCE Dr John Glen Interviewed by Dr Paul Merchant C1379/26 © The British Library Board http://sounds.bl.uk This interview and transcript is accessible via http://sounds.bl.uk . © The British Library Board. Please refer to the Oral History curators at the British Library prior to any publication or broadcast from this document. Oral History The British Library 96 Euston Road London NW1 2DB United Kingdom +44 (0)20 7412 7404 [email protected] Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of this transcript, however no transcript is an exact translation of the spoken word, and this document is intended to be a guide to the original recording, not replace it. Should you find any errors please inform the Oral History curators. © The British Library Board http://sounds.bl.uk The British Library National Life Stories Interview Summary Sheet Title Page Ref no: C1379/26 Collection title: An Oral History of British Science Interviewee’s surname: Glen Title: Dr Interviewee’s forename: John W Sex: M Occupation: Physicist Date and place of birth: 6/11/1927; Putney, London Mother’s occupation: Father’s occupation: ‘Day Publisher’, Times Newspaper Dates of recording, Compact flash cards used, tracks (from – to): 28/7/10 (track 1-3); 29/7/10 (track 4-10) Location of interview: Interviewee’s home, Birmingham Name of interviewer: Dr Paul Merchant Type of recorder: Marantz PMD661 Recording format : WAV 24 bit 48kHz Total no. of tracks: 10 Stereo Total Duration: 8:12:10 Additional material: Small collection of digitised photographs, referred to in recording.
    [Show full text]
  • Saddle Bag Mountain Research Natural Area Guidebook
    United States Department of Agriculture Saddle Bag Mountain Forest Service Research Natural Area Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report Guidebook Supplement 34 PNW-GTR-731 September 2007 Reid Schuller and Ronald L. Exeter D E E R P A U RT LT MENT OF AGRICU D E E P R A U R LT TMENTOFAGRICU The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Bald Hill Farm Management Plan
    Bald Hill Farm Management Plan November 25, 2014 Bald Hill Farm Management Plan Greenbelt Land Trust 101 SW Western Blvd. Corvallis, Oregon 97333 541-752-9609 www.greenbeltlandtrust.org Prepared by Jeff Krueger Environments LLC in conjunc on with Greenbelt Land Trust OWEB Grant Number: 212-101 BPA Tract ID: WILWF-WL-7 November 25, 2014 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction and Background............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Management Plan Purpose and Timeframe ........................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Acquisition History and Ownership ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Site Overview, Landscape Context, and Ecological Significance .......................................................................... 2 1.5 The Vision of Bald Hill Farm Conservation Area .................................................................................................. 5 1.6 Bald Hill Farm Conservation Easements .............................................................................................................. 6 1.6.1 BPA Conservation Easement .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Antarctica) Glacial, Basal, and Accretion Ice
    CHARACTERIZATION OF ORGANISMS IN VOSTOK (ANTARCTICA) GLACIAL, BASAL, AND ACCRETION ICE Colby J. Gura A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2019 Committee: Scott O. Rogers, Advisor Helen Michaels Paul Morris © 2019 Colby Gura All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Scott O. Rogers, Advisor Chapter 1: Lake Vostok is named for the nearby Vostok Station located at 78°28’S, 106°48’E and at an elevation of 3,488 m. The lake is covered by a glacier that is approximately 4 km thick and comprised of 4 different types of ice: meteoric, basal, type 1 accretion ice, and type 2 accretion ice. Six samples were derived from the glacial, basal, and accretion ice of the 5G ice core (depths of 2,149 m; 3,501 m; 3,520 m; 3,540 m; 3,569 m; and 3,585 m) and prepared through several processes. The RNA and DNA were extracted from ultracentrifugally concentrated meltwater samples. From the extracted RNA, cDNA was synthesized so the samples could be further manipulated. Both the cDNA and the DNA were amplified through polymerase chain reaction. Ion Torrent primers were attached to the DNA and cDNA and then prepared to be sequenced. Following sequencing the sequences were analyzed using BLAST. Python and Biopython were then used to collect more data and organize the data for manual curation and analysis. Chapter 2: As a result of the glacier and its geographic location, Lake Vostok is an extreme and unique environment that is often compared to Jupiter’s ice-covered moon, Europa.
    [Show full text]
  • Cricket Smart Resources
    IT’S A GLOBAL GAME CURRICULUM-ALIGNED RESOURCES FOR YEAR 1–8 TEACHERS EXTERNAL LINKS TO WEBSITES New Zealand Cricket does not accept any liability for the accuracy of information on external websites, nor for the accuracy or content of any third-party website accessed via a hyperlink from the www.blackcaps.co.nz/schools website or Cricket Smart resources. Links to other websites should not be taken as endorsement of those sites or of products offered on those sites. Some websites have dynamic content, and we cannot accept liability for the content that is displayed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For their support with the development of the Cricket Smart resources, New Zealand Cricket would like to thank: • the New Zealand Government • Sport New Zealand • the International Cricket Council • the ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 • Cognition Education Limited. Photograph on the cover Supplied by ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 Photographs and images on page 2 © Dave Lintott / www.photosport.co.nz 7 (cricket equipment) © imagedb.com/Shutterstock, (bat and ball) © imagedb.com/Shutterstock, (ICC Cricket World Cup Trophy) supplied by ICC Cricket World Cup 2015, (cricket ball) © Robyn Mackenzie/Shutterstock 11 © ildogesto/Shutterstock 12 © imagedb.com/Shutterstock 13 By Mohamed Nanbhay Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) 14 © www.photosport.co.nz 15 Supplied by ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 16 © John Cowpland / www.photosport.co.nz 17 © Anthony Au-Yueng / www.photosport.co.nz 18 © Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock, 19 © VladimirCeresnak/Shutterstock © New Zealand Cricket Inc. No part of this material may be used for commercial purposes or distributed without the express written permission of the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence Variability in the Willamette Valley Redacted for Privacy
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Francine M. Havercroft for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology, History and Anthropology presented on June 16, 1986. Title: Subsistence Variability in the Willamette Valley Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: V Richard E. Ross During the summer of 1981, Oregon State University archaeologically tested three prehistoric sites on the William L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge. Among the sites tested were typical Willamette Valley floodplain and adjacent upland sites. Most settlement-subsistence pattern models proposed for the Willamette Valley have been generated with data from the eastern valley floor, western Cascade Range foothills. The work at Wm. L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge provides one of the first opportunities to view similar settings along the western margins of the Willamette Valley. Valley Subsistence Variabilityin the Willamette by Francine M. Havercroft A THESIS submitted to Oregon StateUniversity in partial fulfillmentof the requirementsfor the degree of Master of Arts in InterdisciplinaryStudies Completed June 15, 1986 Commencement June 1987 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Professor of Anthropology inAT6cg-tof major A Redacted for Privacy Professor of History in charge of co-field Redacted for Privacy Professor of Anthropology in charge of co-field Redacted for Privacy Chairman of department of Anthropology Dean of Graduate School Date thesis is presented June 16, 1986 Typed by Ellinor Curtis for Francine M. Havercroft ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout this project, several individuals have provided valuable contributions, and I extend a debt of gratitude to all those who have helped. The Oregon State university Archaeology field school, conducted atthe Wm. L. Finley Refuge, wasdirected by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Activities List – Valid from 1St December 2018
    Adventures 2018/19 Activities List – valid from 1st December 2018 Inevitably the following list is not exhaustive, so if the activity is not listed please contact us and we will advise terms. Important note applicable to all activities All activities shown are on a non-professional basis unless otherwise stated. Each activity has a category code which determines what the premium is for Part A cover. Some of the risks need to be referred to us – please submit with full details. You are required to follow the safety guidelines for the activity concerned and where applicable you use the appropriate and recommended safety equipment. This would include the use of safety helmets, life jackets, safety goggles and protective clothing where appropriate. Please note that a General Exclusion of cover exists under your policy with us for claims arising directly or indirectly from your "wilful act of self-exposure to peril (except where it is to save human life)". This means that we will not pay your claim if you do not meet this policy condition. Adventures Description category Abseiling 2 Activity Centre Holidays 2 Aerobics 1 Airboarding 5 Alligator Wrestling 6 Amateur Sports (contact e.g. Rugby) 3 Amateur Sports (non-contact e.g. Football, Tennis) 1 American Football 3 Animal Sanctuary/Refuge Work – Domestic 2 Animal Sanctuary/Refuge Work – Wild 3 Archery 1 Assault Course (Must be Professionally Organised) 2 Athletics 1 Badminton 1 Bamboo Rafting 1 Banana Boating 1 Bar Work 1 Base Jumping Not acceptable Baseball 1 Basketball 1 Beach Games 1 Big
    [Show full text]
  • Saddle Bag Mountain Research Natural Area: Guidebook Supplement 34
    United States Department of Agriculture Saddle Bag Mountain Forest Service Research Natural Area Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report Guidebook Supplement 34 PNW-GTR-731 September 2007 Reid Schuller and Ronald L. Exeter D E E R P A U RT LT MENT OF AGRICU D E E P R A U R LT TMENTOFAGRICU The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Sketch of Northwestern Oregon I by P
    Geologic Sketch of Northwestern Oregon i By P. D. SNAVELY, JR., and H. C. WAGNER * CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY i GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1181-M A regional summary of the Tertiary geology in the northern part of the Oregon Coast Range UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract. _____.__-______-___---______-______. Ml Introduction-_ _______________________________ 1 Acknowledgments _____________________________ 2 Geologic setting-______________________________ 2 Stratigraphy_._______________________________ 3 Basaltic pillow lavas and breccias._______.__. 3 Rhythmically bedded sandstone and siltstone. 6 Alkalic basalt _____________________________ 9 Marine tuffaceous siltstone and sandstone. _ _. 10 Basalt flows and breccias.__________________ 13 Gabbroic and alkalic intrusive rocks. ________ 15 Nonmarine fluviatile and lacustrine deposits.. 15 References. ____-___--_-_-____-____.____---___. 16 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Generalized geologic and simple Bouguer gravity map of north­ western Oregon._--_-...___.____.____._____________ In pocket FIGURE 1. Chart showing the correlation between formations in the central and northern parts of the Oregon Coast Range.___.--._-__ M4 2. Basaltic pillow, lava with? radiating 'columnar jointing, Siletz River Volcanic Series of early to middle Eocene age._______ 5 3. Generalized composite stratigraphic section of Tertiary rocks, exposed in the Newport embayment, Oregon__._-___._____ 7 4. Rhythmically bedded sandstone and siltstone of the Tyee For­ mation of middle Eocene age.___________________________ 8 5. Boulder and cobble conglomerate overlain by columnar-jointed subaerial alkalic basalt flow of late Eocene age.-_.--_-_--__ 9 6. Marine tuffaceous siltstone of middle Oligocene age._________ 12 7.
    [Show full text]