DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of Social Effects of the Ohinewai Masterplan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of Social Effects of the Ohinewai Masterplan Assessment of social effects of the Ohinewai Masterplan for Ambury Properties Limited Robert Quigley Quigley and Watts Ltd. Final 27 November 2019 Document control Version of document Date of revision Prepared by Reviewed by 1 – first draft 16 October 2019 Robert Quigley David Gaze, Gaze Holdings Limited. John Olliver, Bloxam Burnett & Olliver Limited. 2 – second draft 22 November 2019 Robert Quigley Sam Foster, Bloxam Burnett & Olliver Limited 3 - final 27 November 2019 Robert Quigley • 2 Table of Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Purpose and objectives of the report .......................................................................................... 11 1.2 The site........................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2 The masterplan ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.1 The primary tenant and approximate timing ............................................................................. 11 1.2.2 Other industrial tenants ............................................................................................................. 12 1.2.3 Retail and other businesses ...................................................................................................... 12 1.2.4 Housing ..................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2.5 Support services ....................................................................................................................... 13 1.2.6 Recreation ................................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.7 Connections to Huntly ............................................................................................................... 13 2. Approach and methodology ................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Statutory framework ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Conceptual framework .................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Geographic study area .................................................................................................................. 15 2.4 Potentially affected groups and key assessment questions ......................................................... 15 2.5 Consultation .................................................................................................................................. 16 2.6 Assessment of effects ................................................................................................................... 16 3. Community profiles ............................................................................................................................. 17 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Population ..................................................................................................................................... 18 3.3 Te Kauwhata, Waerenga, Huntly East and Huntly West .............................................................. 19 4. Population and employment – context and potential effects .............................................................. 21 5. Construction ........................................................................................................................................ 23 5.1 Construction context ..................................................................................................................... 23 5.2 Construction – potential effects ..................................................................................................... 23 6. Housing ............................................................................................................................................... 24 6.1 Housing introduction ..................................................................................................................... 24 6.2 Housing context ............................................................................................................................ 24 6.3 Housing – potential effects ............................................................................................................ 26 7. Education services .............................................................................................................................. 28 7.1 Early Childhood Education ............................................................................................................ 28 7.11 Early childhood education introduction ...................................................................................... 28 7.12 Early childhood education context ............................................................................................. 28 7.13 Early childhood centre – potential effects .................................................................................. 29 • 3 7.2 Schools.......................................................................................................................................... 29 7.21 Schools introduction ................................................................................................................... 29 7.22 Schools – potential effects ......................................................................................................... 31 8. Children’s voice ................................................................................................................................... 35 9. Business .............................................................................................................................................. 39 9.1 Business introduction .................................................................................................................... 39 9.2 Business context ........................................................................................................................... 40 9.2 Business - potential effects ........................................................................................................... 40 10. Health, social and emergency services ............................................................................................ 44 10.1 Health, social and emergency services introduction ................................................................... 44 10.2 Health, social and emergency services context .......................................................................... 44 10.3 Health, social and emergency services - potential effects .......................................................... 46 11. Lumsden Road and Tahuna Road residents .................................................................................... 48 11.1 Lumsden Road and Tahuna Road residents’ introduction.......................................................... 48 11.2 Lumsden Road and Tahuna Road residents’ context ................................................................. 48 11.3 Lumsden Road and Tahuna Road - potential effects ................................................................. 49 12. Community way of life ....................................................................................................................... 51 12.1 Ohinewai ..................................................................................................................................... 51 12.2 Huntly .......................................................................................................................................... 52 12.3 Te Kauwhata ............................................................................................................................... 52 13 Mitigation and monitoring ................................................................................................................... 54 13.1 Construction ................................................................................................................................ 54 13.2 Housing ....................................................................................................................................... 54 13.3 Education services ...................................................................................................................... 54 13.4 Children ....................................................................................................................................... 54 13.5 Businesses .................................................................................................................................. 54 13.6 Health, social and emergency services ...................................................................................... 54 13.7 Lumsden Road and Tahuna Road residents .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rangiriri to Huntly — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa
    10/5/2021 Rangiriri to Huntly — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Rangiriri to Huntly Walking Difculty Easy Length 21.4 km Journey Time 1 day Region Waikato Sub-Region North Waikato Part of Collections Te Araroa - New Zealand's Trail , Te Araroa - North Island Track maintained by Te Araroa Trail Trust https://www.walkingaccess.govt.nz/track/rangiriri-to-huntly/pdfPreview 1/4 10/5/2021 Rangiriri to Huntly — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Once you've crossed the bridge, continue a further 150m around the rst corner and there is a stile to take you across the rst fence to this riverside track which runs parallel to Te Ōhākī Road. On a clear day, you'll see the orange-topped chimneys of the Huntly Power station standing in the distance. 1.5km in, past Maurea Marae, there's a monument to the Ngāti Naho chief, Te Wheoro, whose personal history embodies the extraordinary stresses of colonial rule on Waikato Māori as they argued strategies to preserve tribal identity. Te Wheoro sided at rst with the Crown. In 1857, he spoke against setting up a Māori king and, at the great conference of Māori leaders at Kohimarama in 1860, spoke again in favour of the Government. Governor Grey's British troops invaded Waikato territory in July 1863. In November that year, the British Troops overcame the Māori redoubt at Rangiriri, forcing the Māori King, Tāwhiao, out of Ngāruawāhia to sanctuary around Waitomo and Te Kūiti. In the years that followed, Te Wheoro acted as an intermediary for the Government's negotiation with the King.
    [Show full text]
  • Ages on Weathered Plio-Pleistocene Tephra Sequences, Western North Island, New Zealand
    riwtioll: Lowe. D. ~.; TiP.I>CU. J. M.: Kamp. P. J. J.; Liddell, I. J.; Briggs, R. M.: Horrocks, 1. L. 2001. Ages 011 weathered Pho-~Je.stocene tephra sequences, western North Island. New Zealand. Ill: Juviglle. E.T.: Raina!. J·P. (Eds). '"Tephras: Chronology, Archaeology', CDERAD editeur, GoudeL us Dossiers de f'ArcMo-Logis I: 45-60. Ages on weathered Plio-Pleistocene tephra sequences, western North Island, New Zealand Ages de sequences de tephras Plio-Pleistocenes alteres, fie du Nord-Ouest, Nouvelle lelande David J. Lowe·, J, Mark Tippett!, Peter J. J, Kamp·, Ivan J. LiddeD·, Roger M. Briggs· & Joanna L. Horrocks· Abstract: using the zircon fISsion-track method, we have obtainedfive ages 011 members oftwo strongly-...-eathered. silicic, Pliocene·Pleislocelle tephra seql/ences, Ihe KOIIIUQ and Hamilton Ashformalions, in weslern North !sland, New Zealand. These are Ihe jirst numerical ages 10 be oblained directly on these deposils. Ofthe Kauroa Ash sequence, member KI (basal unit) was dated at 2,24 ± 0.19 Ma, confirming a previous age ofc. 1.25 Ma obtained (via tephrochronology)from KlAr ages on associatedbasalt lava. Members K1 and X3 gave indistinguishable ages between 1,68.±0,/1 and 1.43 ± 0./7 Ma. Member K11, a correlQlilV! ojOparau Tephra andprobably also Ongatiti Ignimbrite. was dated at 1.18:i: 0.11 Ma, consistent with an age of 1.23 ± 0.02 Ma obtained by various methodr on Ongaiiti Ignimbrite. Palaeomagnetic measurements indicated that members XI3 to XIJ (top unit, Waiterimu Ash) are aged between c. 1.2 Ma and O. 78 Mo. Possible sources of/he Kauroa Ash Formation include younger \!Oleanic centres in the sOllthern Coromandel Volcanic Zone orolder volcanic cenlres in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato District Council
    WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel REPORT 2 Ohinewai Rezoning 24 May 2021 Commissioners Dr Phil Mitchell (Chair) Mr Paul Cooney (Deputy Chair) Mr Dynes Fulton Mr Weo Maag Page | 1 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel Page | 2 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 The APL submission ...................................................................................................................... 9 3 Statutory and planning framework ............................................................................................ 15 4 Site suitability and physical characteristics ............................................................................... 18 5 Three Waters Infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 20 6 Natural hazards ........................................................................................................................... 24 7 Transport and traffic ................................................................................................................... 26 8 Economic effects .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District
    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Watercare Waikato River Water Take Application
    Watercare Waikato River Water Take Application Submission Reference no: 77 Nga Muka Development Trust (Glen Tupuhi) Submitter Type: Not specified Source: Email Overall Notes: Clause What are you submitting on? You can submit on specific parts of the application or the application as a whole. Position The whole Watercare application Notes Clause My submission on the Watercare application is that (please select one): Position I oppose it (or specific parts of it) Notes Clause I seek the following decision from the Board of Inquiry: Position Decline the application Notes Clause Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? All submissions will be considered by the Board of Inquiry, but please indicate if you wish to heard in support of your submission. Position I wish to be heard in support of my submission Notes Nga Muka Development Trust SUBMISSION ON WATERCARE'S RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION INTRODUCTION 1. The Nga Muka (Nga Muka) is the representation body of the cluster of marae in the Rangiriri, Te Kauwhata, Waerenga area, namely Maurea, Horahora, Waikare, Okarea, Taniwha. Nga Muka marae cluster in the Waikato Tainui tribal infrastructure. 2. Nga Muka appreciates the opportunity to submit on the resource consent application by Watercare Services Limited (Watercare) for a water take and discharge (and associated infrastructure) from and to the Waikato River. 3. In December 2013 Watercare lodged the resource consent application to the Waikato Regional Council (WRC), and subsequently amended and lodged their application with the Environmental Protection Authority on 11 December 2020 (the application). 4. The application has now been referred to the Board of Inquiry (BOI) for determination.
    [Show full text]
  • 2031 Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 15
    SPORTS FISH AND GAME MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH AND GAME REGION 2021 – 2031 AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH & GAME 156 BRYMER RD, RD 9, HAMILTON PH: 07 849 1666 [email protected] www.fishandgame.org.nz Contents: PART 1 BACKGROUND AND RESOURCE SUMMARY How To Use this Plan ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Operation of Plan .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Plan Review ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Organisational management .................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Fish and Game New Zealand ................................................................................................... 6 2.2. The Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game ................................................................................... 6 3. Legal Context................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Conservation Act 1987 ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Wildlife Act 1953 ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato District Plan Review Archaeological Heritage Project Phase V
    Waikato District Plan Review Archaeological Heritage Project Phase V Dr Alexy Simmons Simmons & Associates Ltd. November 2016 Executive Summary Waikato District Council is currently drafting a new District Plan and is required to recognise and provide for the protection of New Zealand's historic heritage under the Resource Management Act 1991. To accomplish this task a multi-phased WDC Archaeological Heritage Project was commissioned. The information included in this report relates to Phase V of the project. Phase V of the project entails the review and updating of ten archaeological sites that have been scheduled in the operative Waikato District Plan and the Franklin District Plan. The sites are reviewed using the Waikato Regional Council heritage criteria included in the Regional Policy Statement. The other task addressed in this Phase V report is the review of the three ‘Battlefield Viewshafts’ in Appendix C2 of the operative Waikato District Plan. 1 Simmons & Associates Ltd. November 2016 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 Background Information on the Archaeological Heritage Project .................................. 5 Definition of an Archaeological Site ................................................................................. 6 Purpose of Phase V ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Valour in the Waipa
    Captain Charles Heaphy, VC. Major John Carstairs McNeill, VC. included Heaphy, the Māori retreated Ōhaupo en route from Te Awamutu to FOR back to Waiari where they made a stand. Pukerimu. Just outside Ōhaupo, about where the Ōhaupo School is today, they In the ensuing engagement two British observed a Māori lying prone on the VALOUR IN soldiers were killed trying to rescue a track in front. THE WAIPA wounded corporal. Heaphy then went forward to dress the corporal’s wounds, Sensing a trap, McNeill sent Gibson when Māori fired a volley at him from Two men were awarded the Victoria back to Ōhaupo to bring up infantry. a distance of just a few feet. Five balls Cross for “conspicuous gallantry in the McNeill and Vosper then slowly went pierced his clothing and cap, wounding presence of the enemy” while serving in forward to observe the Māori from the him in three places. the Waipā during the Waikato War. top of the rise, but were immediately After dragging the corporal to safety fired on by about 50 Māori concealed in Captain Charles Heaphy of the Auckland with the help of another, Heaphy then bracken fern. Rifle Volunteers, a staff surveyor, was directed soldiers to where the Māori were awarded the Victoria Cross for bravery When they attempted to gallop from the and, despite his wounds, continued to during the engagement at Waiari, a scrub- scene, Vosper’s horse bolted, throwing attend to the injured for the remainder covered old pā site situated above the him to the ground. McNeill at once of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleohydrology and Sedimentology of a Post–1.8 Ka Breakout Flood from Intracaldera Lake Taupo, North Island, New Zealand
    Paleohydrology and sedimentology of a post–1.8 ka breakout flood from intracaldera Lake Taupo, North Island, New Zealand V. Manville* Geology Department, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand, and Wairakei Research Centre, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Private Bag 2000, Taupo, New Zealand J. D. L. White Geology Department, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand B. F. Houghton Wairakei Research Centre, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, C. J. N. Wilson } Private Bag 2000, Taupo, New Zealand ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The Taupo Volcanic Zone, in the central North Island of New Zealand, includes a high concen- Sudden releases of impounded water from Failures of natural or artificial dams have tration of calderas and composite cones, and lakes in volcanic regions constitute a major caused many of the largest known floods, and abundant volcanic lakes vulnerable to breakout and frequently repeated hazard. An outburst constitute a significant threat to life and property floods (Healy, 1975). We present evidence for the flood from Taupo caldera, New Zealand, (Costa, 1988; Costa and Schuster, 1988). Out- catastrophic release of ~20 km3 of water from the released ~20 km3 of water, within decades burst events have occurred in a variety of envi- Taupo caldera following blockage of the caldera- following an ignimbrite-emplacing eruption, ronments and settings, including the enormous lake outlet during the Taupo 1.8 ka eruption ca. 1.8 ka. Paleohydrologic reconstruction of Pleistocene outbursts from glacial and pluvial (Wilson and Walker, 1985). We reconstruct the the Taupo flood provides estimates of peak dis- lakes in North America (e.g., Baker, 1973; Baker paleohydraulic parameters associated with this charge at the outlet in the range 17 000–35 000 and Bunker, 1985; Lord and Kehew, 1987) and flood using dimensionless and physical models m3/s.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Socio- Political Life of the Waikato River MARAMA MURU-LANNING
    6. ‘At Every Bend a Chief, At Every Bend a Chief, Waikato of One Hundred Chiefs’: Mapping the Socio- Political Life of the Waikato River MARAMA MURU-LANNING Introduction At 425 kilometres, the Waikato River is the longest river in New Zealand, and a vital resource for the country (McCan 1990: 33–5). Officially beginning at Nukuhau near Taupo township, the river is fed by Lake Taupo and a number of smaller rivers and streams throughout its course. Running swiftly in a northwesterly direction, the river passes through many urban, forested and rural areas. Over the past 90 years, the Waikato River has been adversely impacted by dams built for hydro-electricity generation, by runoff and fertilisers associated with farming and forestry, and by the waste waters of several major industries and urban centres. At Huntly, north of Taupiri (see Figure 6.1), the river’s waters are further sullied when they are warmed during thermal electricity generation processes. For Māori, another major desecration of the Waikato River occurs when its waters are diverted and mixed with waters from other sources, so that they can be drunk by people living in Auckland. 137 Island Rivers Figure 6.1 A socio-political map of the Waikato River and catchment. Source: Created by Peter Quin, University of Auckland. As the Waikato River is an important natural resource, it has a long history of people making claims to it, including Treaty of Waitangi1 claims by Māori for guardianship recognition and management and property rights.2 This process of claiming has culminated in a number of tribes 1 The Treaty of Waitangi was signed by the British Crown and more than 500 Māori chiefs in 1840.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato and Waipā River Restoration Strategy Isbn 978-0-9922583-6-8
    WAIKATO AND WAIPĀ RIVER RESTORATION STRATEGY ISBN 978-0-9922583-6-8 ISBN 978-0-9922583-7-5 (online) Printed May 2018. Prepared by Keri Neilson, Michelle Hodges, Julian Williams and Nigel Bradly Envirostrat Consulting Ltd Published by Waikato Regional Council in association with DairyNZ and Waikato River Authority The Restoration Strategy Project Steering Group requests that if excerpts or inferences are drawn from this document for further use by individuals or organisations, due care should be taken to ensure that the appropriate context has been preserved, and is accurately reflected and referenced in any subsequent spoken or written communication. While the Restoration Strategy Project Steering Group has exercised all reasonable skill and care in controlling the contents of this report, it accepts no liability in contract, tort or otherwise, for any loss, damage, injury or expense (whether direct, indirect or consequential) arising out of the provision of this information or its use by you or any other party. Cover photo: Waikato River. WAIKATO AND WAIPĀ RIVER RESTORATION STRATEGY TE RAUTAKI TĀMATA I NGĀ AWA O WAIKATO ME WAIPĀ RESTORATION STRATEGY FOREWORD HE KUPU WHAKATAKI MŌ TE RAUTAKI TĀMATA FROM THE PARTNERS MAI I TE TIRA RANGAPŪ Tooku awa koiora me oona pikonga he kura tangihia o te maataamuri. The river of life, each curve more beautiful than the last. We are pleased to introduce the Waikato and Waipā River Restoration Strategy. He koanga ngākau o mātou nei ki te whakarewa i te Rautaki Tāmata i ngā Awa o Waikato me Waipā. This document represents an exciting new chapter in our ongoing work to restore and protect the health and wellbeing of the Waikato and Waipā rivers as we work towards achieving Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato, the Vision & Strategy for the Waikato River.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato Raupatu River Trust and the Waikato Biodiversity Forum Our
    Report from the Waikato Raupatu River Trust and the Waikato Biodiversity Forum held at Hopuhopu on 31 May 2013 Our Freshwater Species - Survival and Enhancement Purposes of the Day Purposes of the Day • Increase knowledge of the management of freshwater species in the Waikato River Catchment • Provide opportunity to share stories on successes, challenges and solutions for enhancing the Waikato River Catchment • Meet with others who undertake biodiversity work Introduction Around sixty people gathered at Te Kauhanga Nui Chambers at Hopuhopu to network and share ideas on the management of freshwater species in and around the Waikato River. Pokaia Nepia opened the forum with a karakia so that we would be blessed, protected and watched over for the day together. Tuna from Lake Areare Julian Williams from the Waikato Raupatu River Trust gave a welcome to participants and then handed the facilitation over to Morning Presentations Terina Rakena who kept us on track for the day. Jacques Boubees presentation covered the results of historical tuna surveys undertaken in both Lake Waahi and the Lower Waikato River. He also focused on trends in elver recruitment Forum participants and results of the elver seeding program of the Waikato Hydro Reservoirs. Fine mesh trap nets were deployed in Lake Waahi in 1987, 1990, 1992 and 1993. These traps became unserviceable so began to be replaced by fine mesh fykes from 1992, with further deployment in 1993, 1994 and 2011. Analysis of records indicates a marked decline in eel numbers between 1987 and 1992 but by 2011 catches had returned to 1987 levels. Throughout the monitoring period the eel population has been dominated by small shortfins which continue to support an important traditional puhi eel (small male migrant) fishery at the lake outlet.
    [Show full text]