DOCSLIB.ORG

Bidirectional Reflectometry. Part II. Bibliography on Scattering by Reflection from Surfaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bidirectional Reflectometry. Part II. Bibliography on Scattering by Reflection from Surfaces JOURNAL OF RESEARC H of the Notional Bureau of Standards - A. Physics and Chemistry Vol. aDA, No.2, M arch-April 1976 Bidirectional Reflectometry. Part II. Bibliography on Scattering by Reflection from Surfaces Joseph C. Richmond and Jack J. Hsia Institute for Basic Standards, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234 (February 2, 1976) In connection with th e work On de velopm ent of a hi gh resolution laser source bid irectional re­ Aectometer, a large nu mber of papers were co ll ected dealing with vari ous aspects of the geo metrical distribution of the radiant energy reAected from s urfaces of differe nt types. Each paper has been classifi ed into one or more classes on the basis of its technical cont ent. The re are eight general classes, with several subclasses in some of the ge neral classes. Because of the inte rest in this fi eld, the bi bli ogra ph y is being published as a servi ce to the publi c. Key words : Bibliograph y; emittance; heat transfer; measurement techniq ues; peri od ic surfaces; polari za tion; random surfaces; reAectance; reAectance of coherent radi a ti on; scatteri ng; scattering theory: s urface roughness; transmitt ance. A large number (37 1) of papers was collected, dealing TABLE 1. Subject Categories with various as pects of the geometrical di stribution of the radiant e nergy scattered by refl ection from sur­ Symbol faces, and partic ularly from ro ugh surfaces. These R ReAectance papers were referred to during the development of a Em E mittance high-resolution laser-source bidirectional refl ectometer. T Transmittance Each paper is classifi ed in the Bibliography into one S Scattering or more of thirteen subject categories on the basis of P P olari za tion Ma Mathematics its technic al content. A key to the symbols used in the H Heat Transfer Betw een Rough Surfaces bibliography is gi ven in table l. Ex Experimental In addition, each paper by number has been classi­ Th Theoreti cal fi ed in a second system, consisting of eight primary Su Survey classes, with several subclasses in several of the L Laser SM Surface Roughn ess Measure me nt primary classes, in table 2. Ap Apparatus The bibliography, while extensive, is by no means complete. Few additions have been made since about 1972. However, it is sufficiently extensive to be of T ABLE 2. Primary Classes significant help to workers in the field, and particularly to those just beginning work in the fi eld. The references from archival journals should be NOMENCLATURE AND APPLICATION available in any good technical library. Most of the 8, 42,50,52, 97, 101 , 102, 113, 125, 132,141, 143,144, 154, 155, 180, reports that have not been published in the archival 195,216, 23 7, 238,243,275,314,315,327,341 ,345 literature are available from the National Technical SURF ACE ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENT Information Service. Most of these are identified by an AD number, or other identifying number by which 3, 12, 13, 16, 36, 61 , 64, 65, 66,69, 73,80, 87,95, 98,99, Ill, they can be ordered. 115, 127, 133, 135, 136, 149, 157, 162, 171, 176, 190,226-232, Copies of all papers listed are on fil e in the Radio­ 245 , 247, 255, 257, 258,262,265,267, 277, 281, 286, 308, 312, 331,347,359,361-365 metric Physics Section of the National Bureau of Standards, and may be read at NBS if not otherwise THEORY (RANDOM DISTRIBUTION SURFACE ROUGH­ available. NESS) 207 201-6060- 76 - 5 SMALL FACETS SURFACE ASSUMPTION R, Th L Adorjan, A_ S_ and Wi erum, F_ A_, Radiative prop­ erties of rough surfaces, AIAA Paper No_ 70- 18-21, 41, 77, 137, 138a, 181 , 198, 210, 217, 223, 241, 261, 862, AIAA 5th Thermophysics Conference, 280,292,306 ,321,326,328,330 June 1970_ KIRCHHOFF-HUYGENS SOLUTION Em, Th 2_ Agababov, S_ G_, Effect of roughn ess of the sur­ face of a solid bod y on its radiation properties 9, 11, 32, 34, 36, 54, 81 , 82,90,91, 92, 114, 116, 121, 137, and methods for their experimental determina­ 140,150, 153,160,166,178, 179,254, 263,264,268, 299,304,311 tion, Hi gh Temp_ 6 0), 76-85 (1968)_ OTHERS SM 3_ Agababov, S_ G_ and Eksler, L t, Influence of the geometric characteristics of the reli ef of th e sur­ 10, 23, 24, 25, 32, 53, 67, 70, 76, 79 , 84, 88, 89, 96, 105, 108, face of a solid on its radiation properties 109, 112, 119, 120, 123, 126, 128, 134, 146, 159, 170, 183, 184, (determination of the roughness factor), High 185, 193, 194, 199, 202, 205, 211, 223, 233, 242, 244, 274, 291, Temp_ 9 (3), 475-479 (1971)_ 301,303,307,313,328, 339,342,343 R,Ex 4_ Agnew, .l- T_ and McQuistan, R R, Experiments THEORY (pERIODIC DISTRIBUTION SURFACE concerning infrared diffuse reflectance stand­ ROUGHNESS) ards in the range 0_8 to 20_0 microns, J. Opt. Soc_ Am_ 43 (11) , 999-1007 (1953)_ CONTINUOUS SURFACES (SINUSOIDAL, GRATING, V­ GROOVE, etc_) S, R,Th 5_ Aksenov, V_ L , On the scattering of electro­ magnetic waves from sinusoidal and trochoidal 1,5, 6,7,14,17,22,29,32, 49,51,55,59,60,114,142, 156, surfaces of finite conductivity, Radio Eng. & 161, 167, 168, 169, 188,209, 213, 214, 215, 219, 233, 234, 284, Electron. 3 (4), 1-10 (1958). 353, 367,370 S,Ex,Ap 6. Aksenov, V.!., Experimental investigation of elec­ SPHERES AND DISTRIBUTION tromagnetic wave scattering from periodically uneven surfaces, Radio Eng. & Electron. (USS R) 37-40, 43,44,56,57,104,158, 177,187,207,246,248,272, 5 (5) 113-129 (1960). 332,334,335,337,352,355,356,366 S, Th 7. Aksenov, V. t, Utilization of Kirchhoff's approxi­ CYLINDERS AND DISTRIBUTION mation in the proble m of the scattering of radio waves by periodically rough surfaces with finite 56,68, 110, 147, 164, 174,220,222,239,250,289,293,294, conductivity, Radio Eng. & Electron. 3, 332,333,336,338,340,349,350,351 307-314 (Mar. 1961). SHADOWING AND POLARIZATION H 8_ Amar, R. C. and Edwards, D. K., Reflection and transmission by rough-walled passages, AIAA 28, 30, 57, 62, 74, 103, 117, 118, 119, 122, 124, 129, 138a, 202, Paper No. 72-303, 1-9, AIAA 7th Thermo­ 203, 204, 210, 224, 225, 252, 253, 260, 261, 279, 287, 292, 298, physics Conference, San Antonio, Tex., Apr. 317,348,367,368 10-12,1972. R,Th 9. Ament, W_ S., Toward a theory of reflection by a EXPERIMENTAL DATA (ON RANDOM DISTRIBUTION rough surface, Proc. IRE 41, 142-146 (Jan. SURFACES) 1953). COHERENT SOURCE R,S, Th 10. Ament, W_ S. , Forward- and back-scattering from certain rough surfaces, IRE Trans_ AP-4 (3), 15,75,84,85,131,189, 191 , 192, 194, 208,283 369-373 (July 1956). R,S,Th 11. Ament, W. So, Reciprocity and scattering by cer­ INCOHERENT SOURCE tain rough surfaces, IRE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation AP-8 (2), 167-174 (Mar. 1960). 4, 26, 27 , 33, 35, 45-48, 58, 70, 72, 73, 93, 102, 106, 130, 139, 145, 151 , 163, 165, 212, 218, 221, 240, 251, 256, 259, 261, 270, SM 12 _ American Standard, Surface texture-surface rough­ 271, 273, 276, 278, 285, 295, 296, 297, 300, 309, 310, 316- ness, waviness and lay-ASA B46.1-1962, UDC 318, 320, 323, 324, 325, 329, 346, 354, 357 62L9.015-American Society of Mechanic al Engineers. EXPERIMENTAL DATA (ON PERIODIC DISTRIBUTION SURFACES) SM 13. Armand, G., Lapujoulade, J _, and Paigne, J-, A theoretical relationship between the leakage of gases through the interface of two metals in con­ 78,86,94,168,197,201, 285,370,37] tact and their superficial micro-geometry, Vac­ uum 14, 53-57 (1964). GONIOREFLECTOMETER S,Th 14_ Artmann, K. , Zur Theorie der anomalen reflexion COHERENT SOURCE von optischen strichgittern, Z_ Physik 119, 529-567 (1942). 15, 71, 78, 84, 85, 131, 180, 191, 192, 194,201,206,208 ,283 Ap, Ex(L) 15. Bair, M. E., Carmer, D. C, and Stewart, S. R. , A gonioreflectometer .facility using coherent and INCOHERENT SOURCE incoherent sources, Tech_ Rept. AF AL-TR- 70-161, p_ 1-30_ Infrared and Optics Lab_, 4,35,45,47,48,58,73,83, 106, 139, 145, 163, 196, 197,212, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. (Aug. 218,221,235,259,295,297,300,320,323,354,37] 1970). 208 SM 16. Barash, V. Ya. and Uspenskii , Yu . P., Test metro­ Scientific Research Labs., Seattle, Wash., Geo­ logical characteri sti cs of surface-roughness astrophysics Lab. (Oct. 1967)_ AD-666 593. measuring in strument s, Measurement Tech. No.2, 273-274 (Feb. 1969). (Translated from R, Th, Su 32. Beckmann, P _ and Spizzichino, A_, The scattering lzmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 2, 83, Feb. 1969). of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces, Vo l. 4 , International Series of Monographs on S, Th 17. Baret, J. F. and Mann, J. A., Role of hi gh·order Electromagneti c Waves (Perga mon Press, grating effects in th e scattered irradiance of cor· Macmill an, New York, N.Y. 1963). rugated surfaces, Appl. Opt. 10 (5), 1174-1176 (1971 ). R, Ex 33. Bennett, H. E., Specul ar re fl ectance of aluminized ground glass and the height distribution of sur­ R, Th,Ex 18. Barkas, W. W. , Analysis of li ght scatt ered from a face irregularities, J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1. Introduction & Theory
    1. Introduction & Theory Neha Singh October 2010 Course Overview Day 1: Day 2: Introduction and Theory Genosc Layer Transparent Films Absorbing Films Microstructure – EMA If time permits: – Surface roughness Non-idealities – Grading (Simple and Ultra thin films function-based ITO) Uniqueness test – Thickness non-uniformity UV Absorption Review – Point-by-point fit Actual Samples © 2010, All Rights Reserved 2 Introduction & Theory Light Materials (optical constants) Interaction between light and materials Ellipsometry Measurements Data Analysis © 2010, All Rights Reserved 3 Light Electromagnetic Plane Wave From Maxwell’s equations we can describe a plane wave ⎛ 2π ⎞ E(z,t) = E0 sin⎜ − (z − vt) + ξ ⎟ ⎝ λ ⎠ Amplitude Amplitude arbitraryarbitrary phase phase X Wavelength Wavelength VelocityVelocity λ Electric field E(z,t) Y Z Direction Magnetic field, B(z,t) of propagation © 2010, All Rights Reserved 4 Intensity and Polarization Intensity = “Size” of Electric field. I ∝ E 2 Polarization = “Shape” of Electric field travel. Different Size Y •Y E More Intense Less (Intensity) Intense E Same Shape! X (Polarization) •X © 2010, All Rights Reserved 5 What is Polarization? Describes how Electric Field travels through space and time. X wave1 Y E wave2 Z © 2010, All Rights Reserved 6 Describing Polarized Light Jones Vector Stokes Vector Describe polarized light Describe any light beam with amplitude & phase. as vector of intensity ⎡S ⎤ ⎡ E2 + E2 ⎤ iϕx 0 x0 y0 ⎡Ex ⎤ ⎡E0xe ⎤ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 2 2 ⎥ = S1 ⎢ Ex0 −Ey0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ iϕy ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ = E E e ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ y ⎦ ⎣⎢ 0y ⎦⎥ S2 2Ex0Ey0 cosΔ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣S3 ⎦ ⎣⎢2Ex0Ey0 sinΔ⎦⎥ © 2010, All Rights Reserved 7 Light-Material Interaction velocity & c wavelength vary v = in different n materials n = 1 •n = 2 Frequency remains constant v υ = λ © 2010, All Rights Reserved What are Optical Constants n , k Describe how materials and light interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Optical Interferometry and Spectral Reflectometry for High Fidelity Thin Film Measurements
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2017 Implementation of Optical Interferometry and Spectral Reflectometry for High Fidelity Thin Film Measurements Armando Arends-Rodriguez University of Central Florida Part of the Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Arends-Rodriguez, Armando, "Implementation of Optical Interferometry and Spectral Reflectometry for High Fidelity Thin Film Measurements" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 5440. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5440 IMPLEMENTATION OF OPTICAL INTERFEROMETRY AND SPECTRAL REFLECTOMETRY FOR HIGH FIDELITY THIN FILM MEASUREMENTS by ARMANDO ANDRE ARENDS-RODRIGUEZ B.S. University of Central Florida, 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2017 Major Professor: Shawn A. Putnam ABSTRACT An in-house reflectometer/interferometer has been built to investigate the varying curvature and thickness profiles in the contact line region of air, acetone, iso-octane, ethanol, and water on various types of substrates. Light intensity measurements were obtained using our reflectometer/interferomter and then analyzed in MATLAB to produce thickness and curvature profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Neutron Reflectometry
    INTRODUCTION TO NEUTRON REFLECTOMETRY Giovanna Fragneto Institut Laue-Langevin The importance of interfaces They are everywhere: our body, food we eat, drinks, plants, animals, soil, atmosphere, manufacturing, chemical factories…. In many cases interfaces have a significant effect in the behaviour of a system ! Examples: Inner lining of lung: surfactants prevent lung from collapsing at the end of expiration Nanotechnology: solid surfaces are the places where the processes of interest take place Detergency! Biofouling Why Neutron Reflectometry? Probe relevant lengths (Å to µm) Sensitive to light elements (H, C, O, N) Buried systems and complex sample environment Possibility of isotopic labelling Non-destructive REFLECTOMETRY 1-5000 Å Specular θi=θf Reflectivity •Thickness of layers at measurements: interfaces •Roughness/interdiffusion •Composition in the direction normal to the interface MomentumMomentum transfer transfer parallel in xz plane surface normal In-plane features (height fluctuations, domains, holes ...) can be probed by off- specular measurements: for thin films synchrotron radiation is more suitable Scattering length density profile extracted from data analysis Liquid D2O z Solid Si-SiO2 1675 - Newton realised that the colour of the light reflected by a thin film illuminated by a parallel beam of white light could be used to obtain a measure of the film thickness. Spectral colours develop as a result of interference between light reflected from the front and back surfaces of the film. 1922 - Compton showed that x-ray reflection is governed by the same laws as reflection of light but with different refractive indices depending on the number of electrons per unit volume. 1944 - Fermi and Zinn first demonstrated the mirror reflection of neutrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Erratum to ''Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Reflectometry from Gratings
    Thin Solid Films 468 (2004) 339–346 www.elsevier.com/locate/tsf Erratum Erratum to ‘‘Spectroscopic ellipsometry and reflectometry from gratings (Scatterometry) for critical dimension measurement and in situ, real-time process monitoring’’ [Thin Solid Films 455–456 (2004) 828–836]$ Hsu-Ting Huang1, Fred L. Terry Jr.* Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, The University of Michigan, 2417F EECS Building, 1301 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122, USA Available online Abstract Spectroscopic, specular reflected light measurements (both ellipsometry-SE, and reflectometry-SR) of grating structures have relatively recently been shown to yield very accurate information on the critical dimensions, wall-angles and detailed wall shape of deep submicron features. The technique is often called ‘scatterometry’ or optical critical dimension (OCD) measurement. This technique has been moved rapidly from initial demonstrations to significant industrial application. In this paper, we will review the development of this technique for in situ and ex situ applications. When applied in situ, this technique opens up exciting new opportunities for studying the evolution of topography in semiconductor fabrication processes and for applying real-time control methods for nanometer level feature size accuracy. We will briefly comment on limitations and challenges for this measurement technique. D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Scatterometry; Critical dimension measurement; Process control 1. Introduction effects. The strong effects of diffraction from dense, small scale integrated circuit structures causes these approxima- Spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) and reflectometry (SR) tions to fail in many interesting cases and continued to limit are key thin film measurement techniques for integrated the applications of SE and SR for patterned wafers.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflectometry Involves Measurement of the Intensity of a Beam of Electromagnetic Radiation Or Particle Waves Reflected by a Planar Surface Or by Planar Interfaces
    Application of polarized neutron reflectometry to studies of artificially structured magnetic materials M. R. Fitzsimmons Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA and C.F. Majkrzak National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 3 Neutron scattering in reflection (Bragg) geometry............................................................. 5 Reflectometry with unpolarized neutron beams ............................................................. 5 Theoretical Example 1: Reflection from a perfect interface surrounded by media of infinite extent ............................................................................................................ 10 Theoretical Example 2: Reflection from perfectly flat stratified media................... 11 Theoretical Example 3: Reflection from “real-world” stratified media ................... 15 Reflectometry with polarized neutron beams ............................................................... 20 Theoretical Example 4: Reflection of a polarized neutron beam from a magnetic film ................................................................................................................................... 23 Influence of imperfect polarization on the reflectivity ............................................. 25 “Vector” magnetometry with polarized neutron beams............................................ 27 Theoretical
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Reflectometry
    Ill HU9900726 NEUTRON REFLECTOMETRY A.A. van Well IRI, Delft 1. INTRODUCTION On July 14, 1944, Fermi discovered that neutrons could be totally reflected from a surface [1]. The recognition that this was a direct consequence of the wave character of the neutron resulted in the assessment of many analogies between neutrons and light. This part offieutron research where reflection, refraction, and interference play an essential role is generally Teferred"to as 'neutron optics'. Klein and Werner |2, 5\ give an extensive review of many aspects of neutron optics. For a very good and clear introduction in this field, we refer to Sears [4]. Analogous to optics with visible light, a refractive index n for neutron can be defined for each material. If we define n = 1 in vacuum, it appears that for almost all materials the refractive index for thermal neutrons is smaller than unity. The deviations from 1 are in the order of 10~5. This implies that for most materials total reflection will occur at small glancing angles (of the of a fraction of 1 degree) coming from the vacuum (or air), just opposite the normal situation for light. The ifeutron wavelength, the scattering length density and the magnetic properties of the material determine the critical angle for total reflection. We"wilT come bacYTcHfiTs~TrTcretail in tHe~next""sections. TotaTrefTection ot neutrons fs extensively applied in the determination of the neutron scattering length [5], for the transport of neutrons over long distances (10 - 100 m) in neutron guides [6], in filter systems [7], and neutron polarisers [8-10].
    [Show full text]
  • Beam Profile Reflectometry: a New Technique for Thin Film Measurements
    BEAM PROFILE REFLECTOMETRY: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR THIN FILM MEASUREMENTS IT. Fanton, Jon Opsal, D.L. Willenborg, S.M. Kelso, and Allan Rosencwaig Therma-Wave, Inc. Fremont, CA 94539 INTRODUCTION In the manufacture of semiconductor devices, it is of critical importance to know the thickness and material properties of various dielectric and semiconducting thin films. Although there are many techniques for measuring these films, the most commonly used are reflection spectrophotometry [1,2] and ellipsometry [3]. In the former method, the normal­ incidence reflectivity is measured as a function of wavelength. The shape of the reflectivity spectrum is then analyzed using the Fresnel equations to determine the thickness of the m.m. In some cases, the refractive index can also be determined provided that the dispersion of the optical constants are well known. The latter method consists of reflecting a beam of known polarization off the sample surface at an oblique angle. The m.m thickness, and in some cases the refractive index, can be determined from the change in polarization experienced upon reflection. While these two methods have adequately addressed the needs of the semiconductor industry in the past, limitations in both of these technologies present serious challenges to some of the more demanding measurement requirements of the industry today. For example, there are a great variety of materials being used, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) oxides, nitrides and oxynitrides, poly silicon and amorphous silicon, and metals, whose optical properties depend on the actual deposition conditions. To determine the thickness accurately, it is often necessary to measure the refractive index, n, or even the extinction coefficient, k, as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Mueller Ellipsometry to Optical Characterization E
    Application of Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Mueller Ellipsometry to Optical Characterization E. Garcia-Caurel1, A. De Martino1, J-P. Gaston2, L.Yan3 1LPICM, CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France 2HORIBA Scientific, Chilly-Mazarin, France 3HORIBA Scientific, Edison, NJ, USA This article aims to provide a brief overview of both established and novel ellipsometry techniques, as well as their applications. Ellipsometry is an indirect optical technique in that information about the physical properties of a sample is obtained through modeling analysis. Standard ellipsometry is typically used to characterize optically isotropic bulk and/or layered materials. More advanced techniques like Mueller ellipsometry, also known as polarimetry in literature, are necessary for the complete and accurate characterization of anisotropic and/or depolarizing samples which occur in many instances, both in research and “real life” activities. In this article we cover three main areas of subject: basic theory of polarization, standard ellipsometry and Mueller ellipsometry. Section I is devoted to a short and pedagogical introduction of the formalisms used to describe light polarization. The following section is devoted to standard ellipsometry. The focus is on the experimental aspects, including both pros and cons of commercially available instruments. Section III is devoted to recent advances in Mueller ellipsometry. Applications examples are provided in sections II and III to illustrate how each technique works. Keywords: Polarization; Ellipsometry; Thin Films; Mueller matrix INTRODUCTION The use of polarized light to characterize the optical properties of materials, either in bulk or thin film format, has enjoyed great success over the past decades. The different methods of generating and analyzing the polarization properties of light is traditionally called Ellipsometry.
    [Show full text]
  • NEUTRON REFLECTOMETRY: a PROBE for MATERIALS SURFACES the Following States Are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency
    1HXWURQ5HIOHFWRPHWU\ $3UREHIRU0DWHULDOV6XUIDFHV 3URFHHGLQJVRID7HFKQLFDO0HHWLQJ 9LHQQD±$XJXVW NEUTRON REFLECTOMETRY: A PROBE FOR MATERIALS SURFACES The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GHANA PAKISTAN ALBANIA GREECE PANAMA ALGERIA GUATEMALA PARAGUAY ANGOLA HAITI PERU ARGENTINA HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES ARMENIA HONDURAS POLAND AUSTRALIA HUNGARY PORTUGAL AUSTRIA ICELAND QATAR AZERBAIJAN INDIA REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BANGLADESH INDONESIA ROMANIA BELARUS IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION BELGIUM IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA BELIZE IRELAND SENEGAL BENIN ISRAEL SERBIA BOLIVIA ITALY SEYCHELLES BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JAMAICA SIERRA LEONE BOTSWANA JAPAN SINGAPORE BRAZIL JORDAN SLOVAKIA BULGARIA KAZAKHSTAN SLOVENIA BURKINA FASO KENYA SOUTH AFRICA CAMEROON KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SPAIN CANADA KUWAIT SRI LANKA CENTRAL AFRICAN KYRGYZSTAN SUDAN REPUBLIC LATVIA SWEDEN CHAD LEBANON SWITZERLAND CHILE LIBERIA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC CHINA LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA TAJIKISTAN COLOMBIA LIECHTENSTEIN THAILAND COSTA RICA LITHUANIA THE FORMER YUGOSLAV CÔTE D’IVOIRE LUXEMBOURG REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA CROATIA MADAGASCAR TUNISIA CUBA MALAYSIA CYPRUS MALI TURKEY CZECH REPUBLIC MALTA UGANDA DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC MARSHALL ISLANDS UKRAINE OF THE CONGO MAURITANIA UNITED ARAB EMIRATES DENMARK MAURITIUS UNITED KINGDOM OF DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MEXICO GREAT BRITAIN AND ECUADOR MONACO NORTHERN IRELAND EGYPT MONGOLIA UNITED REPUBLIC EL SALVADOR MOROCCO OF TANZANIA ERITREA MYANMAR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ESTONIA NAMIBIA URUGUAY ETHIOPIA NETHERLANDS UZBEKISTAN FINLAND NEW ZEALAND VENEZUELA FRANCE NICARAGUA VIETNAM GABON NIGER YEMEN GEORGIA NIGERIA ZAMBIA GERMANY NORWAY ZIMBABWE The Agency’s Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957. The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Reflectometry Combined with Complementary Techniques to Solve Complex Soft Matter Problems at the Air/Water Interface
    Richard Campbell – Hercules – 16/09/2014 Neutron Reflectometry combined with Complementary Techniques to solve Complex Soft Matter Problems at the Air/Water Interface Oxford Durham Lund Grenoble Presentation Outline • Part 1. – polymers, surfactants & biomolecules at surfaces: relevant questions – neutron reflectometry: focus on FIGARO for free liquid surfaces – ellipsometry: background, instruments, analysis & strengths – 3 other experimental techniques: background & applications • Part 2. – 4 examples of different problems that can be solved on FIGARO • Part 3. – 4 case studies where techniques help us understand a system – summary: complementarity of neutron reflectometry & ellipsometry – overview: attributes of the techniques in the case studies Soft Matter & Biology at Liquid Interfaces • Quantification. – the surface excess, thickness, uniformity and roughness of adsorbed, spread or coated material in an interfacial layer • Composition. – the proportion of different materials in a mixed interfacial layer • Structure. – preferred orientation of individual chemical bonds – mean tilt angle of rigid chains – lateral detail (e.g. domains or separation of attached particles) – medial detail (e.g. stratified multilayer structures or inhomogeneity) Soft Matter & Biology at Liquid Interfaces – lateral detail (e.g. domains or separation of attached particles) – medial detail (e.g. stratified multilayer structures or inhomogeneity) Techniques for Studying Liquid Interfaces • Neutron reflectometry (NR). – structure & quantified composition – contrast from isotopic labelling • Ellipsometry (ELL). – precision, sensitivity & fast kinetics – calibration to physical parameters • Other techniques. – Infrared reflectometry (ER-FTIRS) – Surface tensiometry (ST) – Brewster angle microscopy (BAM) Neutron Reflectometry: Physical Basis • Specular reflection of neutrons close to grazing incidence. • Reflectivity (R) is plotted typically against the momentum transfer (Q). 4 sin Q • Scattering lengths can be considered as a neutron refractive index.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Neutron Reflectometry
    EPJ Web of Conferences 236, 04001 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023604001 JDN 24 An introduction to neutron reflectometry Fabrice Cousin1,* and Giulia Fadda1,2 1Université Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire Léon-Brillouin, CEA-CNRS, CEA-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur- Yvette, France 2Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, UFR SMBH, 74 rue Marcel-Cachin, F-93017 Bobigny, France Abstract. Specular neutron reflectivity is a neutron diffraction technique that provides information about the structure of surfaces or thin films. It enables the measurement of the neutron scattering length density profile perpendicular to the plane of a surface or an interface, and thereby gives access to the profile of the chemical composition of the film. The wave-particle duality allows to describe neutrons as waves; at an interface between two media of different refractive indexes, neutrons are partially reflected and refracted by the interface. Interferences can occur between waves reflected at the top and at the bottom of a thin film at an interface, which gives rise to interference fringes in the reflectivity profile directly related to its thickness. The characteristic sizes that can be probed range from 5Å to 2000 Å. Neutron-matter interaction directly occurs between neutron and the atom nuclei, which enable to tune the contrast by isotopic substitution. This makes it particularly interesting in the fields of soft matter and biophysics. This course is composed of two parts describing respectively its principle and the experimental aspects of the method (instruments, samples). Examples of applications of neutron reflectometry in the biological domain are presented by Y. Gerelli in the book section “Applications of neutron reflectometry in biology”.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Reflectometry
    Neutron Reflectometry Roger Pynn Indiana University and the Spallation Neutron Source Surface Reflection Is Very Different From Most Neutron Scattering • Normally, neutrons are very WEAKLY scattered – One can ignore doubly scattered neutrons • This approximation is called the Born Approximation • Below an angle of incidence called the critical angle, neutrons are perfectly reflected from a smooth surface – This is NOT weak scattering and the Born Approximation is not applicable to this case • Specular reflection is used: – In neutron guides – In multilayer monochromators and polarizers – To probe surface and interface structure in layered systems Why Use Neutron Reflectivity? • Neutrons are reflected from most materials at grazing angles • If the surface is flat and smooth the reflection is specular – Perfect reflection below a critical angle – Above the critical angle reflectivity is determined by the variation of scattering length density perpendicular to the surface – i.e. we can determine the “average” density profile normal to the surface of a film on the surface • Diffuse scattering gives information on surface & interface roughness Images courtesy of M. Tolan & T. Salditt Various forms of small angle neutron reflection Viewgraph from M. R. Fitzsimmons Randomly Chosen Examples of Neutron Reflectometry Studies • Inter-diffusion of polymers • Phase separation in block copolymers • Amphiphilic molecules at air-water interfaces • Effect of shear on films of complex fluids • Grafting of polymers to surfaces (mushrooms and brushes) • Swelling of films exposed to vapor • Magnetic structure of multilayers • CMR/GMR films • Exchange bias and exchange springs • Nuclear polarization in spintronic materials Refractive Index for Neutrons 2π 2 The nucleus - neutron potential is given by : V (rr) = h bδ (rr) for a single nucleus.
    [Show full text]