DOCSLIB.ORG

Nicene Theology and Christian Virtue in Gregory of Nyssa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nicene Theology and Christian Virtue in Gregory of Nyssa Becoming Like God in Christ: Nicene Theology and Christian Virtue in Gregory of Nyssa Author: Jonathan Michael Bailes Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108786 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2020 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Becoming Like God in Christ: Nicene Theology and Christian Virtue in Gregory of Nyssa Jonathan Michael Bailes A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the department of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Boston College Morrissey College of Arts and Sciences Graduate School March 2020 © Copyright 2020 Jonathan Michael Bailes BECOMING LIKE GOD IN CHRIST: NICENE THEOLOGY AND CHRISTIAN VIRTUE IN GREGORY OF NYSSA Jonathan Bailes Advisor: Khaled Anatolios ABSTRACT Within the context of his controversy with Eunomius of Cyzicus, Gregory of Nyssa articulated a distinctly pro-Nicene conception of the perfection of God. Gregory identified divine perfection with the philanthropic goodness that is manifested in the economic activity of God and that is witnessed most vividly in the saving incarnation and death of Jesus Christ. Yet, while this particular understanding of divine perfection served Gregory’s defense of Nicene trinitarian theology, its influence was not limited to that element of his theology alone. To the contrary, Gregory’s pro-Nicene conception of the nature of divine perfection finds a perfect corollary in his discussion of the nature of human perfection. Thus, in his anthropological writings, Gregory interprets humanity as a living and active mirror of the characteristic goodness and love of divine power. Similarly, in his ascetical literature, he suggests that the goal of the Christian life is the attainment of godlikeness through participation in divine perfection, and that the form which this participation takes is an imitation of the virtues of Jesus Christ. And in his writings on the spiritual ascent of the soul, Gregory identifies the summit of the virtuous life as active participation in the philanthropic goodness of God. Christian virtue, therefore, is nothing other than imitation of and participation in the perfection of the one whom Gregory calls “the God of the gospel,” the God of Nicaea, the God made known in the person of Jesus Christ. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………...v Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………... vii Introduction……………………………………………………………………………... 1 State of the Literature…………………………………………………………….. 3 Contribution of this Project……………………………………………………... 15 Scope and Method………………………………………………………………. 16 Summary of the Argument……………………………………………………… 18 Chapter 1: God of the Gospel………………………………………………………… 22 Divine Perfection and Trinitarian Theology in Eunomius of Cyzicus…………. 25 Trinitarian Theology and Divine Perfection in Gregory of Nyssa……………... 43 The Perfection of God and the Person of Christ………………………………... 62 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………… 75 Chapter 2: Mirrors of Divine Perfection…………………………………………….. 79 Like God: A Dynamic Image of Divine Perfection…………………………….. 82 Unlike God: The Mutability and Corruption of the Image……………………. 112 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………….. 120 Chapter 3: The Imitation of Christ as the Imitation of the Divine Nature………. 125 Divine Perfection and Christlikeness in On the Christian's Profession………. 128 The Imitation of Christ in On Perfection……………………………………… 145 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………….. 164 Chapter 4: Spiritual Ascent and Philanthropic Descent………………………….. 169 Nicene Theology and Christian Virtue in Homilies on the Beatitudes……….. 171 Nicene Theology and Christian Virtue in Life of Moses……………………… 198 Nicene Theology and Christian Virtue in Homilies on the Song of Songs……. 220 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………….. 243 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………….. 246 v vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS “I tremble with gratitude.” That is the opening line of a poem by Wendell Berry, but it is also a fitting expression of my own feelings as I reflect on the contributions of those who have made this work possible. First, I am deeply indebted to those who have taught and mentored me, passing on to me in the process their love of learning and granting me the knowledge and skill that has enabled my own study. Most fundamental of all, I am grateful to the two people who were responsible for the first twelve years of my education, my parents, Steve and Ellen Bailes. It was my mother who first taught me to read and to write and it was my father who first taught me to love the study of theology and the study of languages. And more than anyone else, it was my mother and father who first taught me to know and to love the One who is at the center of this study, the God made known in the person of Jesus Christ. At Bryan College, Jud Davis taught me to read Greek and Michael Palmer taught me to greet the world with wonder and to take delight in the joys of thinking. Of my many excellent professors at Beeson Divinity School, Carl Beckwith and Mark Gignilliat deserve special mention. They not only taught me to love the study of theology and theological history, they also mentored and inspired me. At Boston College, I have benefited from the gift of teachers such as Stephen Brown, Andrew Prevot, and Brian Robinette who trained me and cared for me in ways that far exceeded my expectation. And when the time came for me to write my dissertation, Brian Dunkle and Warren Smith both showed undeserved generosity toward me in their willingness to join my committee and in their encouragement and counsel along the way. Of all my teachers, however, I owe a particular debt of gratitude to Khaled Anatolios and Boyd Taylor Coolman. For his part, Boyd introduced me to a world of medieval theologians whom I knew little about, and his infectious enthusiasm for that world has left its mark on me. But more importantly, Boyd proved time and again to be a wise counselor, a loyal advocate, and a generous friend. Finally, when I first came to Boston College, it was to study with Khaled Anatolios. And that is a decision that I have not for a moment regretted. Anyone who reads this dissertation will quickly realize its immense indebtedness to Khaled’s own scholarship. What they may not realize, however, is the significant role that he has played in helping me think through its shape and in bringing it to conclusion. On more occasions than I care to remember, Khaled listened to me express my uncertainties and frustrations with this project. And on each occasion, it was his encouragement and reassurance that propelled me forward. Of course, it is not only teachers to whom I owe a debt of gratitude. I am also immensely grateful for the communities and friends who have lent their support along the way. First and foremost among them is the wonderful community of people at Church of the Cross. For the six years that my family and I lived in Boston, they were more than a church. They were friends, and they were family. I am also deeply grateful to the community at Christ Church, as well as to their staff and their rector, Paul Donison, who gave me their consistent support and assistance as I neared the completion of this project. My colleagues in the doctoral program at Boston College proved to be a source of not vii only professional inspiration and support, but genuine friendship. I am particularly grateful for Drew Alexander, Clint Burnett, Jaisy Joseph, Ty Monroe, Nathaniel Peters, Clifton Stringer, and Katie Wrisley Shelby. Along with these colleagues, I have been blessed by the gift of friends who provided consistent support, needed counsel, and the pleasure of their companionship both throughout the process of this dissertation and at crucial moments along the way. In particular, I wish to thank Christopher Allison, Sam Abbott, Jonathan Barber, Mark and Mandy Booker, David Decosimo, Jonathan Hicks, Jason Hood, Piotr Malysz, Ryan O’Dowd, Benjamin Smith, Carolyn Stickney, and Chris Stroup. I am also immensely grateful for the unwavering support of both sides of my family (the Bailes and the Palmer side). Within that family, there are three people who have been particularly responsible for the joy that has accompanied my life as I have worked on this dissertation, and they are my three children: Elizabeth, Charlie, and Lucy. None of them have ever known a time when I was not in graduate school, and they have endured my absence during many days and nights of study, research, and writing, all the while blessing me with their affection, their humor, and their delight. Finally, to one person above all others I owe my deepest gratitude, and that is to my wife and my best friend, Rachael. She studied with me at Beeson and it was in class with her that I first discovered a love for early Christian history and thought. She came with me to Boston and it was together that we experienced every joy and every trial of the years of study that followed. She endured the tedious stops and starts of my writing; she encouraged me when I was discouraged; she celebrated with me over even the smallest successes. I cannot imagine a more loving or more supportive partner and I am more grateful for her than I know how to express. No one did more to support this dissertation than she did, and I dedicate it gladly to her. viii ix Nicene Theology and Christian Virtue An Introduction In his 1979 study of the history of Christian spirituality, The Wound of Knowledge, Rowan Williams observes that Gregory of Nyssa drew more frequently than most previous Christian writers on the classical notion of virtue to articulate the nature of the Christian life, which he conceived of as a progressive growth in participation of and likeness to God. Yet in Gregory’s hands, the ideal of virtue was purged from its Hellenistic associations with aristocratic dignity and infused with the language of humble service to God and to one’s neighbor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cross of Christ 17 As Each Tiny Detail in the Works of Nature Reveal Omething of the Artist Hand That Fa Hioned the World
    Cf"he Cross of Christ By BRO. FflRRER CASSIDY, 0. P. HE cross is prominent now. A few days ago a cross of dry ashes was printed on our foreheads; all during D Lent the cross will be preached from the pulpit, and will be followed in the fourteen Stations. On Passion Sunday it will become still more vivid in our imagination be­ cause a veil will hide it from our sight. On Good Friday Holy Church, distressed with grief, actually turn her sorrowing soul more earnestly toward the cross than to the Mass; her grief does not darken her reason-she understands that this day must be dedicated to the cross, for it was on thi day that she sprang forth from the open side of Him vVho hung on the cross. True, her voice is shaking when she narrates the seeming victory of perfidious Israel over her Spouse when they nailed Him to the eros , but the bitter story ends with a gloriou , victorious cry that the triumph finally goes to the cross: "Above all he trees of cedar, thou only art most high, thou, on which hung the Life of the world, on which Christ triumphed, and death vanquished death forever!" After that every one of her holy edifices is turned into an unadorned monstrance to display this cross of Christ. The visible world delightful to the eye; the stars of heaven, the mountains of earth, the trees, flowers, the sea, the sky, are a picture-book in which to read God's glory, for all these things are imitations of divine beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Ratzinger. Concerning the Notion of Person in Theology
    assumed in Christ and in the new law (on the basis of the Retrieving the Tradition resolution of the eternal law into the Christic predestination), and that which is assumed is not abolished: quod est assumpturn est senmtum. To one who does not believe, it is always possible to demonstrate the intrinsic reasonableness of a norm which is Concerning the notion of person knowable even naturally, without failing from the beginning to present it as an ingredient of a whole which receives its full in theology foundation only jn the Chdstic perspective. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger Relativity toward the other constitutes the human person. The human person is the event or being of relativity. The concept of person, as well as the idea that stands behind this concept, is a product of Christian theology. In other words, it grew in the first place out of the interplay between human thought and the data of Christian faith and so entered intellec- tual history. The concept of the person is thus, to speak with Gilson, one of the contributions to human thought made pos- sible and provided by Christian faith. It did not simply grow out of mere human philosophizing, but out of the interplay between philosophy and the antecedent given of faith, espe- cially Scripture. More specifically, the concept of person arose from two questions that have from the very beginning urged themselves upon Christian thought as central: namely, the question, 'What is God?" (i.e., the God whom we encounter in Scripture); and, "Who is Christ?" In order to answer these fundamental questions that arose as soon as faith began to re- flect, Christian thought made use of the philosophically insig- nificant or entirely unused concept "prosopon" = "persona." It thereby gave to this word a new meaning and opened up a new dimension of human thought.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sinlessness of Jesus: an Evidence for Chris- Tianity
    The Sinlessness of Jesus: An Evidence for Chris- tianity. Author(s): Ullmann, Carl (1796-1865) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library i Contents Title Page 1 Pefatory Material 3 Advertisement. 3 From the Preface to the Sixth Edition. 4 Preface to the Seventh Edition. 6 Contents. 8 Introduction 10 Part First. The Idea of Sinlessness. 18 Introduction. 19 Chapter I. Of Sin. 20 Chapter II. Of Sinlessness. 31 Part Second. The Sinless Holiness of Christ. 35 Introduction. 36 Chapter I. Testimony to the Sinlessness of Christ. 37 Sec. 1.—By Others. 38 Sec. 2—The Testimony of Jesus to Himself. 57 Chapter II. The Sinlessness of Christ Proved from the Effects Produced by His 66 Manifestation. Sec. 1.—The New Life of Christianity in its Moral and Religious Aspects. 67 Sec. 2.—Morality and Religion united in Holiness. 72 Sec. 3—These Effects caused not by an Idea, but by an Actual Person. 74 Part Third. Objections. 82 Introduction. 83 Chapter I. Arguments Against the Actual Sinlessness of Jesus. 85 Sec. 1—The Development of the Person of Jesus. 86 Sec. 2.—The Development of the Messianic Plan. 90 ii Sec. 3.—The Temptation. 96 Sec. 4.—Other Acts and Expressions of Jesus, as Arguments against His 110 Sinlessness. Chapter II. Arguments Against the Possibility of Sinlessness in General. 120 Introduction. 121 Sec. 1.—Arguments drawn from Experience. 122 Sec. 2.—Arguments drawn from the Nature of the Moral Idea. 128 Part Fourth. Inferences from the Foregoing Facts and Arguments. 134 Introduction. 135 Chapter I. Significance of Sinlessness with Respect to the Person of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa
    Durham E-Theses Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Neamµu, Mihail G. How to cite: Neamµu, Mihail G. (2002) Language and theology in St Gregory of Nyssa, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4187/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk University of Durham Faculty of Arts Department of Theology The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa Mihail G. Neamtu St John's College September 2002 M.A. in Theological Research Supervisor: Prof Andrew Louth This dissertation is the product of my own work, and the work of others has been properly acknowledged throughout. Mihail Neamtu Language and Theology in St Gregory of Nyssa MA (Research) Thesis, September 2002 Abstract This MA thesis focuses on the work of one of the most influential and authoritative theologians of the early Church: St Gregory of Nyssa (f396).
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories Of
    ABSTRACT The Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret Scott A. Rushing, Ph.D. Mentor: Daniel H. Williams, Ph.D. This dissertation analyzes the transposition of the apostolic tradition in the fifth-century ecclesiastical histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret. In the early patristic era, the apostolic tradition was defined as the transmission of the apostles’ teachings through the forms of Scripture, the rule of faith, and episcopal succession. Early Christians, e.g., Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen, believed that these channels preserved the original apostolic doctrines, and that the Church had faithfully handed them to successive generations. The Greek historians located the quintessence of the apostolic tradition through these traditional channels. However, the content of the tradition became transposed as a result of three historical movements during the fourth century: (1) Constantine inaugurated an era of Christian emperors, (2) the Council of Nicaea promulgated a creed in 325 A.D., and (3) monasticism emerged as a counter-cultural movement. Due to the confluence of these sweeping historical developments, the historians assumed the Nicene creed, the monastics, and Christian emperors into their taxonomy of the apostolic tradition. For reasons that crystallize long after Nicaea, the historians concluded that pro-Nicene theology epitomized the apostolic message. They accepted the introduction of new vocabulary, e.g. homoousios, as the standard of orthodoxy. In addition, the historians commended the pro- Nicene monastics and emperors as orthodox exemplars responsible for defending the apostolic tradition against the attacks of heretical enemies. The second chapter of this dissertation surveys the development of the apostolic tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • St Basil's Contribution to the Trinitarian Doctrine: A
    ST BASIL’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE TRINITARIAN DOCTRINE: A SYNTHESIS OF GREEK PAIDEIA AND THE SCRIPTURAL WORLDVIEW Philip Kariatlis Abstract: St Basil’s contribution to the formulation of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity has long been acknowledged in the Christian tradition. Indeed, he was responsible for articulating the ‘orthodox’ vision of God with theological and philosophical originality that truly laid the foundations upon which the way of pondering the Trinitarian mystery in the East was established. His achievement lay in his remarkable ability to ennoble the culture of the day with the Christian message without in any way compromising the latter. This paper explores the Trinitarian theology of St Basil with a view towards highlighting the harmonious synthesis of Greek paideia and the scriptural worldview. ndeniably, the Church’s teaching on the mystery of the Holy Trinity stands at the very heart of Christian belief. Indeed, Uit has rightly been recognised as Christianity’s differentia specifica, namely that specific teaching which clearly distinguishes the 1 Christian faith from all other forms of monotheism. Notwithstanding the importance of this teaching and the fact that it is firmly rooted in the Scriptures, it nevertheless took the early Church many years to acquire a clearly articulated theology of the Trinitarian mystery. The need for precise terminology particularly emerged when the Church had to define with accuracy in what way the one God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – namely, the Father almighty – was related to Jesus Christ – who was professed to be God’s only begotten Son, his eternal Word and Image – PHRONEMA, VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Coakley and the Future of Systematic Theology
    Being George Eliot: An Impossible Standpoint? Janice McRandal “Coakley is the George Eliot of Theologians.”1 This claim, made by Mark Oppenheimer, has sat uncomfortably in my memory for many years now, punctuated by a perpetual question mark. Oppenheimer was most likely referring to the way prose operated in Coakley’s work, but the ambiguity, or rather the irony, of this analogy has stuck. Eliot, of course, chose to conceal her gender. It was a means to an end, a way to penetrate the literary community of the Victorian era; a choice she felt would allow her work to be taken seriously and shield her from the puritanical gaze. It was a successful strategy for Mary Ann Evans: George Eliot’s legacy is secure alongside the great writers of Western literature. But this is hardly an uncomplicated ascription, perhaps demonstrated by the lasting confusion surrounding Virginia Woolf’s famous declaring of Eliot’s Middlemarch to be “one of the few English novels written for grown- up people.”2 In Coakley’s case, writing systematic theology as a woman 1. Mark Oppenheimer, “Prayerful Vulnerability,” Christian Century 120, no. 13 (2003): 26. 2. Virginia Woolf, “George Eliot,” The Times Literary Supplement, 20 November 1919. Regarding the vii COAKLEY AND THE FUTURE OF SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY has become an identity marker, a way in which her work is praised and critiqued. She has been celebrated for her “erudite, challenging and eirenic theological voice,”3 her work being described as a “connoisseur’s piece,”4 while simultaneously being critiqued for her academic Fachsprache,5 an ongoing issue of concern for feminists debating the use of exclusive language in the field.6 Much of this evaluation seems to depend on assumptions regarding what constitutes a serious systematician, or a solemn feminist.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Coakley
    god, sexuality, and the self God, Sexuality, and the Self is a new venture in systematic theology. Sarah Coakley invites the reader to reconceive the relation of sexual desire and the desire for God, and – through the lens of prayer practice – to chart the intrinsic connection of this relation to a theology of the Trinity. The goal is to integrate the demanding ascetical undertaking of prayer with the recovery of lost and neglected materials from the tradition, and thus to reanimate doctrinal reflection both imaginatively and spiritually. What emerges is a vision of human longing for the triune God which is both edgy and compelling: Coakley’s théologie totale questions standard shib- boleths on ‘sexuality’ and ‘gender’, and thereby suggests a way beyond current destructive impasses in the churches. The book is clearly and accessibly written, and will be of great interest to all scholars and students of theology. sarah coakley is Norris–Hulse Professor of Divinity at the University of Cambridge. Her publications include Religion and the Body (Cambridge, 2000), Powers and Submissions: Philosophy, Spirituality and Gender (2002), Pain and its Transformations (2008), The Spiritual Senses (with Paul L. Gavrilyuk; Cambridge, 2011), and Sacrifice Regained (Cambridge, 2012). Coakley is also the editor of Re-Thinking Gregory of Nyssa (2003) and co-editor (with Charles M. Stang) of Re-Thinking Dionysius the Areopagite (2009). University Printing House, Cambridge CB28BS, United Kingdom Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-HBM Volume 2 For
    RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS: ETHICAL ISSUES AND POLICY GUIDANCE VOLUME II COMMISSIONED PAPERS Rockville, Maryland January 2000 The National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) was established by Executive Order 12975, signed by President Clinton on October 3, 1995. NBAC’s functions are defined as follows: a) NBAC shall provide advice and make recommendations to the National Science and Technology Council and to other appropriate government entities regarding the following matters: 1) the appropriateness of departmental, agency, or other governmental programs, policies, assignments, missions, guidelines, and regulations as they relate to bioethical issues arising from research on human biology and behavior; and 2) applications, including the clinical applications, of that research. b) NBAC shall identify broad principles to govern the ethical conduct of research, citing specific projects only as illustrations for such principles. c) NBAC shall not be responsible for the review and approval of specific projects. d) In addition to responding to requests for advice and recommendations from the National Science and Technology Council, NBAC also may accept suggestions of issues for consideration from both the Congress and the public. NBAC also may identify other bioethical issues for the purpose of providing advice and recommendations, subject to the approval of the National Science and Technology Council. National Bioethics Advisory Commission 6100 Executive Boulevard, Suite 5B01, Rockville, Maryland 20892-7508 Telephone: 301-402-4242 • Fax: 301-480-6900 • Website: www.bioethics.gov RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS: ETHICAL ISSUES AND POLICY GUIDANCE VOLUME II COMMISSIONED PAPERS Rockville, Maryland January 2000 National Bioethics Advisory Commission Harold T. Shapiro, Ph.D., Chair President Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey Patricia Backlar Rhetaugh Graves Dumas, Ph.D., R.N.
    [Show full text]
  • SF/RHTH 502, “Mystics” Instructor: Mark N
    Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago Course Profile Course # and Title SF/RHTH 502, “Mystics” Instructor: Mark N. Swanson Semester/Year: Spring 2018 Time and Place: Thursday, 8–11 am, Room 202 Course Rationale and Description (Why do we offer this course? Which of LSTC’s degree program stated competencies does it address?): Throughout the history of the Christian Church, many of its great (and some of its most unusual and surprising) teachers have done theology in an experiential mode that came to be known as “mystical theology;” they themselves have come to be known as “mystics.” This course will provide an introduction to a number of very different Christian “mystics,” e.g. Gregory of Nyssa, Evagrius Ponticus, Bernard of Clairvaux, Hildegard of Bingen, Bonaventure, Meister Eckhart, Julian of Norwich, Teresa of Ávila, St. John of the Cross, and (jumping to the 20th century) Thomas Merton; students may bring others into our conversation. Special attention will be given to (a) the diversity of lives and theologies that have been given the label “mystical;” (b) the contextual particularity of their witness, shaped as they are by particular traditions, scriptures, liturgies, communities, and vocations in the world; (c) the contributions these witnesses have made, and continue to make, to Christian theology: to our understanding of God (the Holy Trinity), the work of Christ (atonement, justification), the activity of the Holy Spirit, and so on. Furthermore, we will pay attention to the connection between mystical theology and contemplative practice on the one hand, and active service in the world on the other. (Does a course on Mystics belong in a Public Church curriculum?) At some point we will bring in a comparative element, through examining some individuals termed “mystics” in other religious traditions, notably the Islamic tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Diss Final 4.04.11
    Senses of Beauty by Natalie Michelle Carnes Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Stanley Hauerwas, Supervisor ___________________________ Jeremy Begbie ___________________________ Elizabeth Clark ___________________________ Paul Griffiths ___________________________ J. Warren Smith Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 i v ABSTRACT Senses of Beauty by Natalie Michelle Carnes Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Stanley Hauerwas, Supervisor ___________________________ Jeremy Begbie ___________________________ Elizabeth Clark ___________________________ Paul Griffiths ___________________________ J. Warren Smith An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 Copyright by Natalie Carnes 2011 Abstract Against the dominant contemporary options of usefulness and disinterestedness, this dissertation attempts to display that beauty is better—more fully, richly, generatively—described with the categories of fittingness and gratuity. By working through texts by Gregory of Nyssa, this dissertation fills out what fittingness and gratuity entail—what, that is, they do for beauty-seekers and beauty-talkers. After the historical set-up of the first chapter, chapter 2 considers fittingness and gratuity through Gregory’s doctrine of God because Beauty, for Gregory, is a name for God. That God is radically transcendent transforms (radicalizes) fittingness and gratuity away from a strictly Platonic vision of how they might function. Chapter 3 extends such radicalization by considering beauty in light of Christology and particularly in light of the Christological claims to invisibility, poverty, and suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doctrine of Sin in the Thought of George R. Knight: Its Context and Implications
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Master's Theses Graduate Research 2009 The Doctrine of Sin in the Thought of George R. Knight: Its Context and Implications Jamie Kiley Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses Recommended Citation Kiley, Jamie, "The Doctrine of Sin in the Thought of George R. Knight: Its Context and Implications" (2009). Master's Theses. 47. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses/47 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. ABSTRACT THE DOCTRINE OF SIN IN THE THOUGHT OF GEORGE R. KNIGHT: ITS CONTEXT AND IMPLICATIONS by Jamie Kiley Adviser: Denis Fortin ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Thesis Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE DOCTRINE OF SIN IN THE THOUGHT OF GEORGE R. KNIGHT: ITS CONTEXT AND IMPLICATIONS Name of researcher: Jamie Kiley Name and degree of faculty adviser: Denis Fortin, Ph.D. Date completed: December 2009 George R. Knight attempts to chart a middle course between various historical extremes on the doctrine of sin. His view of the Fall and of the consequent effects on human nature is not as pessimistic as that of theologians in the Augustinian tradition (including Martin Luther and John Calvin), who stress the complete corruption of human nature and the loss of free will.
    [Show full text]