DOCSLIB.ORG

Kingdom Come: the Amillennial Alternative PDF Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kingdom Come: the Amillennial Alternative PDF Book KINGDOM COME: THE AMILLENNIAL ALTERNATIVE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Dr Sam Storms | 589 pages | 20 May 2013 | Christian Focus Publications Ltd | 9781781911327 | English | Tain, United Kingdom Kingdom Come: The Amillennial Alternative PDF Book Storms then moves to an extended criticism of premillennialism. Bock and Eric C. Order now. Maybe because I am already convinced by most of his arguments that I felt this chapter repeated some of the main arguments, which in that case I may be too harsh with this criticism. I myself was brought up under the same teaching as Storms regarding eschatology. Storms marshals exegetical and theological arguments in defense of his view in this wide-ranging work. Israel, the church, and "replacement" theology -- The eschatology of Jesus: Matthew 24 and the Olivet discourse 1 -- The eschatology of Jesus: Matthew 24 and the Olivet discourse 2 -- The book of Acts and the promise of Israel's restoration -- Romans 11 and the "future" of Israel -- The kingdom of God: now and not yet -- The postmillennial view of the kingdom of God -- The book of Revelation and biblical eschatology: the chronology of the seal, trumpet, and bowl judgments -- Amillennialism, Revelation 20, and the binding of Satan -- Amillenialsim, Revelation 20, and the first resurrection -- The Antichrist in biblical eschatology: a study of Revelation 13 and 17 -- The Antichrist in biblical eschatology: a study of 2 Thessalonians 2 -- A cumulative case argument for amillennialism The second coming of Christ is a matter of sharp disagreement amongst Christians. You are commenting using your WordPress. Storms offers probably the best polemic look at premillennialism and the amillennial alternative. While it's beneficial to do that on occasion, Storms makes it to be more of a distraction. In these early sections of this book, Storms makes clear that bald literalism is not always the best interpretive grid, especially for apocalyptic literature. But it does happen and it happened to well regarded pastor and author Sam Storms. Despite the theological distinctions there are clearly covenant promises and blessings made to entire households and the visible church community that do not include election and all that follows. Dec 06, Andy Huette rated it really liked it. It doesn't make sense for God to lay out his naked battle plans, and it isn't something a master Storyteller would do either. Storms reveals an absolute mastery of Biblical Greek, and employs this trade in the most intricate details of these Biblical passages. He was taught by some of the greatest Dispensational theologians such as Walvoord, Ryrie and Pentecost. Storms begins the near page work by advancing the hermeneutical principles on which he will build his case. Create a free website or blog at WordPress. Related Products. Jan 02, Mark Lickliter rated it really liked it. This is an exhaustive dive into biblical eschatology. I always appreciate Sam's writing, his even-handed opinions, and Christocentric view of the Scriptures. Storms critiques can come across strong and passionate at times but his tone should not distract one from the force of the arguments he advances. He has authored or edited 22 books and has published numerous journal articles and book reviews. Amillennialism alone is consistent with the New Testament teaching that the natural creation will be delivered from the curse and experience it's "redemption" in conjunction with the "redemption" of our bodies, at the time of the second coming of Christ Rom 9. Aug 17, Tim rated it really liked it. On the other hand, amidst several points of disagreement I have with Amillennialism the greatest that remains is its interpretation of Revelation 20 and the 1, years and its attending events. Just As You Are. His work is marked by careful exegesis of pertinent texts, and ranges widely and deeply in all of the relevant Scriptural passages deal- ing with the end of the age. Even those who remain unconvinced will need to reckon with the powerful case made for an amillennial reading. Kingdom Come: The Amillennial Alternative Writer Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. However, premillennialism is not the only option for Christians. Hardcover , pages. David L. At over pages and over eighteen total chapters, this was no light read by any stretch of the imagination. Jan 24, Nate Weis rated it it was amazing. I happen to agree with his viewpoint, but am certain that even those who don't would find this book a worthwhile read. I am sympathetic to his concerns but I still cannot shake myself of a future millennial kingdom preceding eternity, rather than one that is coexistent with present history. That these alternatives held the majority consensus among the Puritans and Reformers is lost on most. Sam Storms. It doesn't make sense for God to lay out his naked battle plans, and it isn't something a master Storyteller would do either. Many Christians struggle with their eternal security. Description Staff View Search Full Text Description Summary: The hermeneutics of eschatology: five foundational principles for the interpretation of prophecy -- Defining dispensationalism -- The seventy weeks of Daniel 9 and the Old Testament roots of dispensationalism -- Daniel's contribution to Biblical eschatology -- Problems with premillennialism -- Who are the people of God? Post to Cancel. Kaiser Jr. View All. Product Description. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Yes, I did glean some new insights on passages like Matthew 24 , but on others I'm left scratching my head more than before I started. Kingdom Come is extraordinarily helpful to the student of eschatology and no Reformed library will be complete without this book. As someone who leans Dispensational, I have a greater understanding and appreciation of the Amillennial view although I still believe in a future coming Millennial Kingdom before the New Heavens and New Earth and reject that Rev 20 speaks of the Millennial Kingdom in heaven that is concurrent with the Church Age on Earth. Jul 07, Ryan Reed rated it it was amazing. You are commenting using your WordPress. Storms marshals exegetical and theological arguments in defense of his view in this wide-ranging work. Even those who remain unconvinced will need to reckon with the powerful case made for an amillennial reading. Storms is entirely fair and balanced in his analysis. Amillennialism best accounts for the presence of typology in Scripture, according to which Old Testament persons and events and institutions find a deeper and intensified expression and consummation in the antitype. For this is the promise of our almighty and Holy Father may his name be praised and blessed forever, amen. Average rating 4. Our God writes good stories and this one isn't yet finished from where we stand. With that said, he does interact with postmil. Sadly, its dismissive, disrespectful, and derisive tone toward premillennialism detracts from its value, with the result that premillennialists, particularly dispensationalists, may fail to examine its biblical arguments for amillennialism. However, premillennialism is not the only option for Christians. The author calls us afresh to be Bereans who are summoned to search the scriptures to see if these things are so. Next page. This book very clearly defines and refutes dispensational premillennialism and historical premillennialism. It makes Jesus Christ the central emphasis of that story p. Sam Storms' Kingdom Come is a remarkably comprehensive and informative study of eschatology from a Reformed perspective. Storms' book didn't change much for me. One does not have to agree with everything he says on the end of time to be able heartily to recommend this excellent book. Dispensational Premillennialism is wrong because it is built upon wrong theology. I thought his treatment of that passage over the course of two chapters was extremely coherent and has me rethinking Jesus' words in this passage. Postmillennialism is wrong because it expects the church to accomplish in a sinful world what will only be realized in the new h Like most books on eschatology, there is way too much critique and rehashing of dispensationalist beliefs. Apr 30, Bill rated it really liked it Shelves: theology. But this is not the case for all dispensationalists. Kingdom Come: The Amillennial Alternative Reviews I can do no better than Tom Schreiner's comment on this book: "Even those who remain unconvinced will need to reckon with the powerful case I have thoroughly enjoyed some of Sam Storms other books, and this was no different. As the title states, a thread that carries through the entire book is Storms' defense of an amillennialist interpretation of Scripture. If he is going to attack a system he needs to attack the best version of it. Though most will doubtlessly disagree with at least a few of Storms conclusions I doubt all readers will be convinced of his partial preterist interpretation of Matthew 24, for instance , it will be impossible to suggest any longer that amillennialism is built upon either a lesser view of the authority of Scripture in particular, or a liberal theological framework in general. Want to Read saving…. However, premillennialism is not the only option-or even the best option-for Christians. Thomas R. Any person who wants to study eschatology needs to at least read his final chapter. As someone who leans Dispensational, I have a greater understanding and appreciation of the Amillennial view although I still believe in a future coming Millennial Kingdom before the New Heavens and New Earth and reject that Rev 20 sp Sam Storms presents a thorough and logical defense of the Amillennial view of Eschatology. The resurrection of unbelievers will happen at the second coming of Christ and not after 1, years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • End Time Chronology from Jesus in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21) Shawn Nelson
    November 5, 2017 End Time Chronology from Jesus in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21) Shawn Nelson (1) How does Matthew 24 fit into our on-going study? The view we’ve been teaching (Premillennialism) says there will be a literal world leader (antichrist) who is able to establish peace treaty in the Middle East between Israel and her neighbors for 7 years (Dan. 9:24-27). In the middle of the 7 years he walks into the temple in Jerusalem, takes away the sacrifices (Dan. 12:11), and declares himself to be God (Dan. 9:27; 11:31; Matt. 24:15; Mark 13:14; 2 Thess. 2:3-4). He forces everybody to worship him (2 Thess. 2:4; Rev. 13:15) and requires them to have a mark in order to buy or sell anything anywhere in the world (Rev. 13:16). Matthew 24 helps us see that Jesus’ taught the above scenario too. Jesus mentions all of the following: the existence of the nation of Israel, the temple in Jerusalem, the antichrist, tribulation, the second coming (and possibly rapture). The Temple to Be Destroyed 24 Then Jesus went out and departed from the temple, and His disciples came up to show Him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said to them, “Do you not see all these things? [the Jerusalem temple] Assuredly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, that shall not be thrown down.” The Disciples’ Two Questions 3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be? [temple being destroyed] And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?” The Tribulation 4 And Jesus answered and said to them: “Take heed that no one deceives you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronology of Revelation 19—20
    Session #5 The Chronology of Revelation 19—20 The Expositors Seminary Super Seminar—April 8–9, 2016 I. Introduction § Key Question: Do the events of Rev 20:1–6 follow the events of Rev 19:11–21? OR Does Rev 20 take the reader back to the beginning of the NT era so that verses 1–6 describe the present age? Comparison of Views Ø The Sequential View of Premillennialism The Millennium of Rev 20 ____________ the Second Coming of Rev 19 Ø The Recapitulation View of Amillennialism The Millennium of Rev 20 ____________ the Second Coming of Rev 19 II. The Sequential View of Premillennialism A. The Introductory “And I Saw” (Rev 20:1) § Used _______ in Book of Revelation § Almost always introduces _______________ ________________ § Argument is _______________ but places burden of proof on amillennial view B. The Content of the Visions (Rev 20:1–6) § The binding of Satan is ____________ (not present) § The first resurrection is ____________ (not spiritual) § The thousand years is ____________ (not symbolic) Ø Therefore: The chronology of Rev 19-20 must be ________________! 19 C. The Use of “Any Longer” (Rev 20:3) § Rev 12–19 repeatedly highlights the satanic deception of the nations in the second half of the Tribulation (12:9; 13:14; 16:14; 18:23; 19:19–20). § Satan is then locked in the abyss “so that he would not deceive the nations any longer” (Rev 20:3), which indicates the interruption of a deception that was already taking place. § This connection indicates a historical progression in which the binding of Rev 20 is designed to halt the deception described in Rev 12–19.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Examination of the Millennium in Rev 20:1–6: Consummation and Recapitulation
    JETS 44/2 (June 2001) 237–51 A RE-EXAMINATION OF THE MILLENNIUM IN REV 20:1–6: CONSUMMATION AND RECAPITULATION dave mathewson* i. introduction The question of the so-called millennial kingdom in Rev 20:1–6 continues to be a source of fascination in evangelical discussion and dialogue.1 The purpose of this article is to re-examine the question of the millennial king- dom as articulated in Rev 20:1–6. More specifically, this article will consider the meaning and function of 20:1–6 within Revelation as it relates to the contemporary debate about whether this section is best understood within a premillennial or amillennial framework. Hermeneutically, most of the de- bate has centered around how literally the reference to the one thousand years in 20:1–6 should be taken and, more importantly, the relationship be- tween 20:1–6 and 19:11–21. Does the thousand year period in 20:1–6 re- fer to a more or less literal period of time?2 Or should it be understood more symbolically? Does 20:1–6 follow 19:11–21 chronologically, with the one thou- sand years featuring a Zwischenreich (premillennialism), or does the final battle in 20:7–10 recapitulate the battle in 19:11–21, with the reference to the one thousand years in 20:1–6 extending all the way back to the first coming of Christ (amillennialism)?3 * Dave Mathewson is instructor in New Testament at Oak Hills Christian College, 1600 Oak Hills Road SW, Bemidji, MN 56601. 1 Cf. R.
    [Show full text]
  • HAPPY to BE NOBODY Catalog No
    PENINSULA BIBLE CHURCH CUPERTINO HAPPY TO BE NOBODY Catalog No. 1079 Matthew 5:1-3 SERIES: THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT First Message Gary Vanderet August 18, 1996 Last week I spent time gathering old photographs the Upper Room Discourse (John 13-17), and the Ser- and other memorabilia from my Junior High days in mon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7). preparation for teaching our Junior High students dur- The Sermon on the Mount is probably the best ing the middle hour this morning. As I browsed known of the teachings of Jesus—and probably the least through my keepsakes, I was struck by two things. obeyed. These words, which are Jesus’ description of First, I see that I’m getting old, and second, the things what he wanted his followers to be and do, are the near- that used to enthrall me are no longer important to me. est thing to a manifesto that he ever uttered. The Ser- Once I thought being successful was a goal worth striv- mon on the Mount is the best explanation, and the clear- ing for, but not anymore. est illustration, of what true Christianity is all about. In my search through my childhood mementos I Christians desperately need to know the difference thought of the children’s story The Velveteen Rabbit, the between true Christianity and the counterfeits that are tale of a toy rabbit who wanted to be more than just a so prevalent today. One man writes: “We live in a day toy sitting on a shelf. I enjoy children’s literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Amillennialism Reconsidered Beatrices
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 43, No. 1,185-210. Copyright 0 2005 Andrews University Press. AMILLENNIALISM RECONSIDERED BEATRICES. NEALL Union College Lincoln, Nebraska Introduction G. K. Beale's latest commentary on Revelation and Kim Riddlebarger's new book A Casefor Ami~~ennialismhave renewed interest in the debate on the nature of the millennium.' Amillennialism has an illustrious history of support from Augustine, theologians of the Calvinistic and ~utheran confessions, and a long line of Reformed theologians such as Abraham Kuyper, Amin Vos, H. Ridderbos, A. A. Hoekema, and M. G. line? Amillennialists recognize that a straightforward reading of the text seems to show "the chronologicalp'ogression of Rev 19-20, the futurity of Satan's imprisonment,the physicality of 'the first resurrection' and the literalness of the one thousand years" (emphasis supplied).) However, they do not accept a chronologicalprogression of the events in these chapters, preferring instead to understand the events as recapitulatory. Their rejection of the natural reading of the text is driven by a hermeneutic of strong inaugurated eschatology4-the paradox that in the Apocalypse divine victory over the dragon and the reign of Christ and his church over this present evil world consist in participating with Christ in his sufferings and death? Inaugurated eschatology emphasizes Jesus' victory over the powers of evil at the cross. Since that monumental event, described so dramatically in Rev 12, Satan has been bound and the saints have been reigning (Rev 20). From the strong connection between the two chapters (see Table 1 below) they infer that Rev 20 recapitulates Rev 12.
    [Show full text]
  • The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2016 The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15 Rebekah Yi Liu [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Liu, Rebekah Yi, "The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15" (2016). Dissertations. 1602. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1602 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT THE BACKGROUNDS AND MEANING OF THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST IN REV 13:14, 15 by Rebekah Yi Liu Adviser: Dr. Jon Paulien ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STDUENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE BACKGROUNDS AND MEANING OF THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST IN REV 13:14, 15 Name of researcher: Rebekah Yi Liu Name and degree of faculty adviser: Jon Paulien, Ph.D. Date Completed: May 2016 Problem This dissertation investigates the first century Greco-Roman cultural backgrounds and the literary context of the motif of the image of the beast in Rev 13:14, 15, in order to answer the problem of the author’s intended meaning of the image of the beast to his first century Greco-Roman readers. Method There are six steps necessary to accomplish the task of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriating Apocalyptic: Paul Ricoeur's
    APPROPRIATING APOCALYPTIC: PAUL RICOEUR’S HERMENEUTICS AND THE DISCOURSE OF MARK 13 by Peter C. de Vries BA, Pennsylvania State University, 1985 MDiv, Princeton Theological Seminary, 1988 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2010 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Peter C. de Vries It was defended on April 2, 2010 and approved by Dale Allison, Professor, Pittsburgh Theological Seminary Alexander Orbach, Associate Professor, Religious Studies Adam Shear, Associate Professor, Religious Studies George Taylor, Professor, School of Law Dissertation Advisor: S. Anthony (Tony) Edwards, Associate Professor, Religious Studies ii Copyright © by Peter C. de Vries 2010 iii APPROPRIATING APOCALYPTIC: PAUL RICOEUR’S HERMENEUTICS AND THE DISCOURSE OF MARK 13 Peter C. de Vries, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2010 Mark 13 predicts that certain events will occur literally within the generation of Jesus’ contemporaries, and today’s reader recognizes that some of these events have not taken place. The reader therefore appropriates the text as a false configuration of the world because it describes the world differently from how it is. However, the hermeneutics of Paul Ricoeur enables a reader to appropriate the text as a presentation of truth. His argument for textual autonomy supports the contention that a text’s meaning is not limited to what the author intended and the original readers perceived. In new reading contexts, the meaning that comes from the text itself creates an evocative dialectic between the reader’s lived world and the world description of the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Week Handout
    Holy Week Study and Traditions Palm Sunday — Triumphal Entry After spending the Sabbath in Bethany with Mary, Martha, and Lazarus, Jesus journeyed up the hill to Bethphage where His disciples obtained a donkey, so He could enter Jerusalem “riding upon an ass” - fulfillment of Zechariah’s prophecy and indication that He would come in peace. Believers spread their garments before him and waved palm branches, shouting “Hosanna to the Son of David, Hosanna in the highest.” * Read Matthew 21: 1-11 and Luke 19: 35-38 * Watch the Triumphal Entry lds.org/bible-videos * Create an Easter Tree — Cut some branches to bloom inside, put them in a large vase and decorate your Easter Tree with ribbons, egg ornaments (most craft stores have some before spring) and small images of the Savior’s life. You can find lots of art images on the web to print and cut at home. Monday — Second Cleansing of the Temple This was three years from the first cleansing when Jesus referred to the temple as “My Father’s house.” The last week of His life, He described the temple as, “My house.” Then He healed the blind and lame, and blighted the fig tree - symbolic of Christ’s detest for hypocrisy and proof that He had power over life and death. Then He returned to Bethany. * Read Matthew 21: 12-16, Mark 11:17, and Matthew 21: 17-22 * Watch Cleansing of the Temple * Easter Walk — Go on a nature treasure hunt for items that represent parts of the Easter story. Read or talk about the Easter story and find the following: - Something thorny or sharp to represent the crown of thorns
    [Show full text]
  • A Questionable Inversion Jesus' Corrective Answer to the Disciples
    44 | Te Journal of Inductive Biblical Studies 3/1:44-67 (Winter 2016) A Questionable Inversion Jesus’ Corrective Answer to the Disciples’ Questions in Matthew 24:3–25:46 Timothy J. Christian*1 [email protected] Abstract: Tis article explores the interrogatory relationship between the disciples’ two questions in Matt 24:3 and Jesus’ twofold answer in Matt 24:4–25:46 (divided 24:4-35 and 24:36–25:46). First, concerning how these questions and answers relate, Jesus answers inverted forms of their questions that imply the form, “what will be the signs of these things?” and “when will your coming and the consummation of the age happen?” Second, concerning why they relate in this way, Jesus does this to correct the disciples’ wrong views about the destruction of the temple and eschatology. Lastly, the article ofers a corrective to the various eschatological positions which are often superimposed upon Matt 24–25. Key Words: olivet discourse, Matthew 24–25, eschatology, synoptic gospels, parousia, end of the age * Timothy J. Christian is a Ph.D. student in Biblical Studies (New Testament) at Asbury Teological Seminary in Wilmore, KY. He has presented his research at the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) Annual Meetings and guest lectured at Asbury University. His research interests are Rhetorical Criticism, 1 Corinthians, New Testament Eschatology, and Textual Criticism. He is currently the worship pastor at NewDay Community Church in Versailles, KY and is seeking ordination in the Christian and Missionary Alliance (C&MA). His wife, Paige Christian, holds her M.S.W. from Asbury University and is also a certifed social worker.
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel of Matthew Matthew 5:1-12
    Gospel of Matthew Matthew 5:1-12 The King’s Sermon – The Beatitudes The Sermon on the Mount was the greatest sermon delivered by the greatest preacher. One Sunday after church, a pastor asked his wife on their way home, “How many really great preachers do you think there are?” To which his wife replied, “I’m not sure about that, but there is one less than you think.” The Sermon on the Mount is the first of five important discourses in Matthew: • The Sermon on the Mount (Mt. 5-7) • The Mission of the Twelve (Mt. 10) • The Parables of the Kingdom (Mt. 13) • The Childlike Nature of the Believer (Mt. 18) • The Olivet Discourse about End-Time Events (Matt. 24-25) The Sermon on the Mount became the foundation for all of Christ’s teaching and ministry. John MacArthur describes the main theme of this sermon: “This sermon is a masterful exposition of the law and a potent assault on Pharisaic legalism, closing with a call to true faith and salvation (7:13-29). Christ expounded the full meaning of the law, showing that its demands were humanly impossible (5:48). This is the proper use of the law with respect to salvation: It closes off every possible avenue of human merit and leaves sinners dependent on nothing but divine grace for salvation (Rom. 3:19-20; Gal. 3:23-24). Christ plumbed the depth of the law, showing that its true demands went far beyond the surface meaning of the words (Mt. 5:28, 39, 44) and set a standard much higher than the most diligent students of the law had heretofore realized (Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Olivet Discourse Matthew 24-25 Luke 21
    Jesus Foretells of the Destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem • Matthew 21, Mark 11, Luke 19, John 12 : Jesus has entered Jerusalem Olivet Discourse as a humble King on a donkey (Zech 9) and is soon to be rejected, beaten, and killed yet rise again on the third day. Matthew 24-25 Luke 21 • “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” John 2:19 W. Cochran [email protected] • Luke 19:41-44 — Jesus Weeps over Jerusalem and foretells its doom • Luke 21:5,6 — Jesus foretells the destruction of the Temple • Matthew 24:5,6; Mark 13:1-2 • 66, 70 AD : First Jewish revolt — city and temple destroyed by Titus 1 2 Jesus is asked a series of questions Jesus Responds The Olivet Discourse Matthew 24:3, Luke 21:6 Matthew 24-25, Mark 13, Luke 21 1. When will this happen? • They expected the Kingdom to appear immediately Luke 19:11 • Mark 13 and Matthew 24-25 is a private response to His disciples on the Mount of Olives 2. What will be the sign of your coming? • Luke 21 is possibly a public response and has some key 3. What will be the sign of the end of the age? differences • Jesus answers from the Mount of Olives in Matthew — the very place that He will return to (Zech 14:4). 3 4 The Signal to Flee Beginning of Birth Pains Matthew vs Luke 1. False Christs (Matt 24:4,5,11; Luke 21:8,9; Rev 6:2; 1 Thess 5:3) • “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation’ …” Matthew 24:15 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Premillennialism and Hermeneutics * * *
    MSJ 29/2 (Fall 2018) 127–55 PREMILLENNIALISM AND HERMENEUTICS Brad Klassen Associate Professor of Bible Exposition The Master’s Seminary The purpose of this article is to identify the primary hermeneutical issues at the center of the divide over eschatology, while providing a brief premillennial response to each. The first of these issues concerns the legitimacy of literal interpretation with respect to prophetic texts. The second concerns the function of progressive revelation and the relationship of subsequent revelation to antecedent revelation. The third con- cerns the influence of presupposition, particularly as it relates to the analogy of faith and the impact of Platonic dualism on the Christian’s approach to Scripture. * * * * * Introduction Discussions about biblical eschatology—the study of the Bible’s teaching about future things—divide over one pivotal event: the timing of the second coming of Jesus Christ. In particular, disagreement over this central piece in God’s redemptive plan relates to what the apostle John described as a “thousand-year” reign of the Messiah in Revelation 20:1–6.1 Three general positions developed throughout church history. First, the oldest view of the church, premillennialism,2 contends that the second coming of Christ occurs prior to (“pre-”) the millennium described by John.3 In other words, premillennialism teaches that Christ will return in order to establish a physical kingdom on earth as described by a non-figurative interpretation of Revelation 20:1– 1 The phrase “thousand years” (χίλια ἔτη) is repeated six times in Revelation 20:1–7. The term “chiliasm” is derived from the Greek adjective χίλια (chilia, “thousand”).
    [Show full text]