Cognition and the Brain of Brood Parasitic Cowbirds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cognition and the Brain of Brood Parasitic Cowbirds Western University Scholarship@Western Psychology Publications Psychology Department 3-1-2019 Cognition and the brain of brood parasitic cowbirds. David F Sherry Mélanie F Guigueno Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub Part of the Behavioral Neurobiology Commons, Biology Commons, and the Psychology Commons Citation of this paper: Sherry, David F and Guigueno, Mélanie F, "Cognition and the brain of brood parasitic cowbirds." (2019). Psychology Publications. 175. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/psychologypub/175 Integrative Zoology 2019; 14: 145–157 doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12312 1 REVIEW 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 Cognition and the brain of brood parasitic cowbirds 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 David F. SHERRY1 and Mélanie F. GUIGUENO2 11 12 12 1 2 13 Department of Psychology, Western University London, Ontario and Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, 13 14 Montreal, Quebec, Canada 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 Abstract 19 20 Cowbirds are brood parasites. Females lay their eggs in the nests of other species, which then incubate the cow- 20 21 bird eggs and raise the young cowbirds. Finding and returning to heterospecific nests presents cowbirds with 21 22 several cognitive challenges. In some species, such as brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater), females but 22 23 not males search for and remember the locations of potential host nests. We describe recent research on sex dif- 23 24 ferences in cognition and the hippocampus associated with this sex difference in search for host nests. Female 24 25 brown-headed cowbirds perform better than males on some, but not all, tests of spatial memory and females 25 26 show a pattern of adult hippocampal neurogenesis not found in males or in closely related non-parasitic birds. 26 27 Because of the apparent specialization of the hippocampus, brown-headed cowbirds may be a good model in 27 28 which to examine spatial information processing in the avian hippocampus and we also describe recent research 28 29 on the spatial response properties of brown-headed cowbird hippocampal neurons. 29 30 30 31 Key words: adult neurogenesis, brood parasites, cowbirds, hippocampus, sex differences, spatial memory 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 this brood parasitic way of life. Selection should be no 36 INTRODUCTION 36 less intense on brood parasites than on non-parasites, 37 37 Brood parasites avoid the costs of nest building, incu- and non-parasites possess a vast range of behavioral, 38 38 bation and parental care by laying their eggs in the nests cognitive, physiological and neural specializations that 39 39 of other birds. For obligate brood parasites, there is no promote successful reproduction (Lack 1972; Williams 40 40 other path to successful reproduction. It therefore seems 2012; Deeming & Reynolds 2016). The present paper 41 41 reasonable to suppose that natural selection has acted describes cognition and the brain of brood parasites, fo- 42 42 on behavior, cognition and the brain of brood parasites cusing on recent research on sex differences in spatial 43 43 to increase individual reproductive success achieved by memory and the hippocampus of cowbirds. 44 44 45 There are 6 major groups of interspecific brood par- 45 46 asites: cowbirds, honeyguides, parasitic finches, Old 46 47 World cuckoos, New World ground-cuckoos, and 1 spe- 47 48 Correspondence: David Sherry, Advanced Facility for Avian cies of parasitic duck (Davies 2000). To succeed in hav- 48 49 Research, Department of Psychology, Western University, ing heterospecific parents incubate their eggs and raise 49 50 London ON N6G 1G9, Canada. their young, brood parasites have to solve a number of 50 51 Email: [email protected] problems that non-parasites do not, and many of these 51 © 2018 International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/ 145 Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd D. F. Sherry and M. F. Guigueno 1 problems are cognitive: brown-headed cowbirds (Jetz et al. 2008). Brown-head- 1 2 1. Find potential host nests. Most songbird hosts of ed cowbirds probably do not achieve a 10-fold repro- 2 3 cowbirds take a great deal of care to conceal their nests ductive advantage compared to non-parasites from the 3 4 to reduce predation on eggs, nestlings and incubating large number of eggs they produce (Woolfenden et al. 4 5 adults, and to reduce brood parasitism. 2003), but their brood parasitic behavior does require 5 6 2. Remember and revisit potential host nests. Hav- finding and returning to a very large number of potential 6 host nests. 7 ing found a nest, female cowbirds return to it later, ei- 7 8 ther to monitor host clutch completion, to lay one of her Female brown-headed cowbirds search for host nests 8 9 own eggs, or to remove a host egg (Sealy 1992; Scar- in which to lay their eggs but males do not. This di- 9 10 damaglia et al. 2017). vision of labor between the sexes does not occur in 10 all cowbirds. In the South American screaming cow- 11 3. Determine the stage of host clutch completion. Fe- 11 bird (Molothrus rufoaxillaris Cassin, 1866) males and 12 male cowbirds prefer to lay in host nests in which a few 12 females search for host nests together. However, in 13 eggs have been laid but the clutch is not yet complete 13 brown-headed cowbirds, search is performed by fe- 14 to ensure that her egg hatches with or before the host’s 14 15 males alone and it occurs some time before females ac- 15 eggs (Sealy 1995). tually lay their parasitic egg. Females often lay at dawn, 16 4. Monitor the host’s response to brood parasitism 16 17 or earlier (Neudorf & Sealy 1994), and so they are not 17 (Hoover & Robinson 2007) and the reproductive out- searching at this time for potential host nests. They are 18 18 come of the cowbird’s brood parasitic behavior (Louder going to a nest they have previously discovered. After 19 19 et al. 2015). laying, they may spend the rest of the morning search- 20 20 Some of the cognitive processes involved in brood ing for host nests in which to lay eggs on subsequent 21 21 parasitism have been examined in current research. days (Scott 1991), or re-visiting nests they have already 22 22 These include spatial memory, especially sex differenc- discovered to check on the progress of host egg laying 23 23 es in spatial memory (Astié et al. 1998; Guigueno et al. and clutch completion (White et al. 2009). Females find 24 2014, 2015; Astié et al. 2015), numerical ability (White nests by flying into understory vegetation to flush in- 24 25 et al. 2007, 2009) and specializations in the brain that cubating hosts or by watching the nest building behav- 25 26 accompany these cognitive specializations (Sherry et ior of hosts from the canopy or the forest floor (Nor- 26 27 al. 1993; Reboreda et al. 1996; Clayton et al. 1997; man & Robertson 1975). Females are choosy about the 27 28 Nair-Roberts et al. 2006; Guigueno et al. 2016). state of the nest in which they lay their egg. They prefer 28 29 29 The research we describe examines how the brood to lay in a nest that already has some eggs in it, but not 30 30 parasitic mode of reproduction has modified cogni- too many. In fact, female brown-headed cowbirds pre- 31 fer to lay in a host nest with 3 eggs in it, but it is equally 31 tion and the brain of brood parasites. We describe sex important that it be an active nest to which the host par- 32 differences in spatial memory that have been found 32 ent is still adding eggs. David White and his colleagues 33 in brown-headed cowbirds and sex differences in the 33 found that day-to-day changes in the number of eggs in 34 brain, specifically in the size of the hippocampus and 34 a host nest can have a major effect on how likely a fe- 35 in adult hippocampal neurogenesis, that are associat- 35 male brown-headed cowbird is to place one of her own 36 ed with these sex differences in spatial memory. Given 36 eggs in that nest (White et al. 2009). This preference 37 the apparent specialization of the brown-headed cow- 37 for nests with a daily change in egg number occurs be- 38 bird hippocampus, we also describe recent research ex- 38 39 cause a nest in which the number of eggs is unchanging 39 amining the spatial response properties of neurons in the is a nest in which the host has ceased laying and begun 40 40 brown-headed cowbird hippocampus. incubation. If incubation has already begun, there is re- 41 41 ally no way to determine when those eggs are likely to 42 42 SEX DIFFERENCES IN SPATIAL hatch. If they hatch before the cowbird egg has complet- 43 ed development, the cowbird egg will be abandoned and 43 44 MEMORY never hatch. In contrast, a nest to which the host is still 44 45 45 Female brown-headed cowbirds [Molothrus ater adding eggs is a nest in which incubation has not yet be- 46 46 (Boddaert, 1783)], parasitize over 200 different spe- gun, and a cowbird egg placed in such a nest will hatch 47 47 cies of host and can lay up to 40 eggs in a breeding sea- along with or even before the host’s young. 48 48 son (Scott & Ankney 1980, 1983; Rothstein et al.
Recommended publications
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil: the Pantanal and Amazon
    Brazil: The Pantanal and Amazon 25 June - 9 July 2016 BIRD AND MAMMAL CHECKLISTS Itinerary: 25 June Arrival/Night in Cuiabá 26 June Chapada dos Guimarães/Night in Chapada dos Guimarães 27 June Chapada dos Guimarães, fly to Alta Floresta/Night Cristalino Lodge 28 June-1 July Cristalino area/Nights Cristalino Jungle Lodge 2 July Return to Cuiabá, drive to Pantanal/Night Pousada Piuval 3 July Piuval area/Night Pousada Piuval 4 July Piuval and Transpantanal highway/Night Pantanal Mato Grosso Hotel 5 July Pixaim river area/Night Pantanal Mato Grosso Hotel 6 July Transpantanal highway AM, jaguar search PM/Night Hotel Porto Jofre 7 July All day on river for Jaguars and others/Night Hotel Porto Jofre 8 July Porto Jofre to Cuiabá/Night in Cuiabá 9 July Departure Notes: 6/26 Agua Fria Road until 8:30, Vale da Bencào until 11:00, Lunch at Penàsco, PM Centro Geodesico 6/27 Agua Fria Road to Radar Station Road. PM Drove from Alto Floresta to Tellpiresa River, Cruise Cristalino River 6/28 Ted Parker tower, back along the trail. PM Arriosto Island and 6/29 Serra trail, various stops along river. PM, up and down river and sat at bird baths near lodge 6/30 Doctor Haffer's trail, Cristalino and Telles Pires River 7/1 Chip Haven Tower, Saleira Loop, No name spot. River, Limau Orchard 7/2 Birding near the lodge, down Tower Trail. PM drive to Pousada Piuval 7/3 Entire day at Pousada Piuval 7/4 Transpantanal Highway, rest of morning at Posada Piuval. PM Transpantanal highway, Pixaim River and environs 7/5 Very near Pixain river 7/6 Pixain River, drove 80km south along Transpantanal Hwy to Porto Jofre.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Breeding and Demography of Yellow Cardinal
    ISSN (impISSNresso/printed) (printed) 0103-5657 ISSN (on-line) 2178-7875 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia Volume 25 Issue 1 www.museu-goeldi.br/rbo March 2017 PublicadaPublished pela / Published by the by the Sociedade BrasileirBraziliana de Orn iOrnithologicaltologia / Brazil iSocietyan Ornithological Society RioBelém Grande - P -A RS ISSN (impresso/printed) 0103-5657 ISSN (on-line) 2178-7875 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia Revista Brasileira EDITOR IN CHIEF Leandro Bugoni, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG, Rio Grande, RS E-mail: [email protected] MANAGING OFFICE ArVitortigos Moretti publicados and Regina na de R Siqueiraevista BuenoBrasileira de Ornitologia são indexados por: Biological Abstract, Scopus (Biobase, Geobase e EMBiology) e Zoological Record. de Ornitologia ASSOCIATE EDITORS Evolutionary Biology: Fábio Raposo do Amaral, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema, SP Manuscripts published by RevistaGustavo Br asileiSebastiánra Cabanne,de Ornitologia Museo Argentino are c odev eCienciasred b yNaturales the foll “Bernadinoowing indexingRivadavia”, Buenosdatabases: Aires, Argentina Biological Abstracts, ScopusJason D. (Weckstein,Biobase, Field Geobase, Museum ofand Natural EM HistoryBiology),, Chicago, and USA Zoological Records. Behavior: Carla Suertegaray Fontana, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS Cristiano Schetini de Azevedo, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, MG Eduardo S. Santos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP Bibliotecas de referência para o depósito da versão impressa: Biblioteca do Museu de Zoologia Conservation:da USP, SP; Biblioteca doAlexander Museu Lees, N Manchesteracional, MetropolitanRJ; Biblioteca University do, Manchester, Museu UKParaense Emílio Goeldi, Ecology: PA; National Museum of CaioNatural Graco HMachado,istory UniversidadeLibrary, S Estadualmithsonian de Feira Idenstitution, Santana, Feira USA; de Santana, Louisiana BA State Systematics, Taxonomy,Universit andy, M Distribution:useum of NaturalLuciano Science, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Nótulas Faunísticas Es Una Revista Científica Que Nació De La Segunda Serie 2018 Mano Del Prof
    ISSN (impreso) 0327-0017 ISSN (on-line) 1853-9564 NótulNótulasas 2018 NótulNótulasas FAUNÍSTICAS FAUNÍSTICAS Nótulas Faunísticas es una revista científica que nació de la Segunda Serie 2018 mano del Prof. Julio Rafael Contreras en la década del 80 y se propuso como una opción más sencilla para comunicaciones o artículos cortos, y focalizada en la fauna vertebrada. En su historia se definen dos etapas. La inicial (primera serie) sumó más de 80 entregas entre los años 1987 y 1998, y fue disconti- nuada. Posteriormente, comenzando el nuevo milenio, la Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara decidió editar la segunda serie de esta publicación. Entre los años 2001 y Segunda Serie 2005 se publicaron 18 números y finalmente en el año 2008, S con Juan Carlos Chebez (1962-2011) como editor, cobró real CA impulso, llegando hoy al número 259. El presente volumen anual compila las Nótulas Faunísticas del año 2018. La colección completa de todas las Nótulas Faunísticas edita- das hasta el presente (primera y segunda serie) está disponible UNÍSTI en formato electrónico en el sitio web de la Fundación: FA www.fundacionazara.org.ar. Mantener viva Nótulas Faunísticas es un homenaje a ese esfuerzo pionero y es un medio más que con rigor técnico Nótulas permite la difusión y conocimiento de hallazgos y novedades sobre la fauna de la región. ISSN (impreso) 0327-0017 - ISSN (on-line) 1853-9564 230-259 Segunda Serie 2018 Nótulas Faunísticas (segunda serie) es una publicación periódica editada por la Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, que con rigor técnico permite la difusión y el conocimiento de hallazgos y novedades sobre la fauna de la región.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Brood Parasites Feeding Nestlings and Fledglings of Their Own Species: a Review
    J. Field Ornithol., 69(3):364-375 ADULT BROOD PARASITES FEEDING NESTLINGS AND FLEDGLINGS OF THEIR OWN SPECIES: A REVIEW JANICEC. LORENZANAAND SPENCER G. SEALY Departmentof Zoology Universityof Manitoba Winnipeg,Manitoba R3T 2N2 Canada Abstract.--We summarized 40 reports of nine speciesof brood parasitesfeeding young of their own species.These observationssuggest that the propensityto provisionyoung hasnot been lost entirely in brood parasitesdespite the belief that brood parasiticadults abandon their offspringat the time of laying.The hypothesisthat speciesthat participatein courtship feeding are more likely to provisionyoung was not supported:provisioning of young has been observedin two speciesof brood parasitesthat do not courtshipfeed. The function of this provisioningis unknown, but we suggestit may be: (1) a non-adaptivevestigial behavior or (2) an adaptation to ensure adequatecare of parasiticyoung. The former is more likely the case.Further studiesare required to determinewhether parasiticadults commonly feed their genetic offspring. ADULTOS DE AVES PARAS•TICASALIMENTANDO PICHONES Y VOLANTONES DE SU PROPIA ESPECIE: UNA REVISION Sinopsis.--Resumimos40 informes de nueve especiesde avesparasiticas que alimenaron a pichonesde su propia especie.Las observacionessugieren que la propensividadde alimentar a los pichonesno ha sido totalmente perdida en las avesparasiticas, no empecea la creencia de que los parasiticosabandonan su progenie al momento de poner los huevos.La hipttesis de que las especiesque participan en cortejo de alimentacitn, son milspropensas a alimentar los pichonesno tuvo apoyo.Las observacionesde alimentacitn a pichonesse han hecho en dos especiesparasiticas cuyo cortejo no incluye la alimentacitn de la pareja. La funcitn de proveer alimento se desconoce.No obstante,sugerimos que pueda ser: 1) una conducta vestigialno adaptativa,o 2) una adaptacitn parc asegurarel cuidado adecuadode los pi- chonesparasiticos.
    [Show full text]
  • Screaming Cowbird Parasitism of Nests of Solitary Caciques and Cattle Tyrants
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 795 The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122(4):795–799, 2010 Screaming Cowbird Parasitism of Nests of Solitary Caciques and Cattle Tyrants Alejandro G. Di Giacomo,1 Bettina Mahler,2 and Juan C. Reboreda2,3 ABSTRACT.—The Screaming Cowbird (Molothrus these events of parasitism resulted from recognition rufoaxillaris) is one of the most specialized brood errors by Screaming Cowbird females that regularly parasites with only three known hosts: Baywing parasitize Baywings and Chopi Blackbirds. The nest of (Agelaioides badius), the main host throughout most Solitary Caciques had been frequently visited by a pair of its range, and two alternative hosts in some areas of of Baywings before Screaming Cowbird parasitism its distribution, Chopi Blackbird (Gnorimopsar chopi) occurred, and the nest of Cattle Tyrants was near an and Brown-and-yellow Marshbird (Pseudoleistes vir- active Chopi Blackbird nest that had been previously escens). We studied Screaming Cowbird parasitism in parasitized by Screaming Cowbirds. Received 5 Janu- northeast Argentina where this parasite uses Baywings ary 2010. Accepted 7 April 2010. and Chopi Blackbirds as hosts. We monitored 69 nests of Baywings, 251 of Chopi Blackbirds, 31 of Solitary Caciques (Cacicus solitarius), and 30 of Cattle Tyrants (Machetornis rixosa). The frequency of Screaming The Screaming Cowbird (Molothrus rufoaxil- Cowbird parasitism on Baywing nests was 80% and laris) is a specialized brood parasite, which was 46% for Chopi Blackbirds. We recorded one event exclusively uses the Baywing (Agelaioides ba- of Screaming Cowbird parasitism on one nest of dius) as a host throughout most of its range Solitary Caciques and three events of Screaming (Mason 1980, Fraga 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Check List 16 (2): 401–422
    16 2 ANNOTATED LIST OF SPECIES Check List 16 (2): 401–422 https://doi.org/10.15560/16.2.401 Birds of the Ramsar site Estação Ecológica de Taiamã and buffer zone, Pantanal wetlands, Brazil Angélica Vilas Boas da Frota, Breno Dias Vitorino, Carolina Joana da Silva, Solange Kimie Ikeda-Castrillon, Josué Ribeiro da Silva Nunes Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Centro de Pesquisa em Limnologia, Etnobiologia e Biodiversidade do Pantanal, Av. Santos Dumont, s/nº - Cidade Universitária (Block II), Cáceres, 78200-000, MT, Brazil. Corresponding author: Angélica Vilas Boas da Frota, [email protected] Abstract The Estação Ecológica de Taiamã (EET) is one of the Ramsar sites in the Pantanal wetlands of Brazil. We present an annotated list of bird species recorded between 2015 and 2018, along with a compilation of existing data for this area. In our sampling, 207 species were recorded, with 76% documented. We have the first record ofChlidonias niger (Linnaeus, 1758) for the Pantanal and Central region of Brazil. Another 30 species are new records for EET, such as the migrant Hirundo rustica Linnaeus, 1758. The general list comprises 24 orders, 60 families, and 278 species, of which 160 were assigned to the primary list and 118 to the secondary list. This study will aid in the conservation of biodiversity in the Pantanal. The EET and its buffer zone are important for maintaining biodiversity and expanding its boundaries may further promote the conservation of birds in Brazilian wetlands. Keywords Bird migration, floodplain, Nearctic migrant, ornithological inventory, Paraguay River, protected areas, waterbirds.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAZIL: the Pantanal and Amazon Birding Tour 29 June – 13 July 2019
    Tropical Birding - Trip Report BRAZIL: the Pantanal and Amazon – June/July 2019 A Tropical Birding Set Departure BIRDING TOUR (www.shorturl.at/hxyW0) BRAZIL: The Pantanal and Amazon Birding Tour 29 June – 13 July 2019 Report and photos by ANDRES VASQUEZ N., the guide for this tour Even though this is primarily a birding tour, the Jaguars always take the first place when it comes to the favorite sightings of the tour, especially in this tour where we got to see 10 different individuals in only two boat outings!!!! This has been by far the most I have seen not only in absolute numbers but also in terms of numbers in a single spot: there was a time when we saw a tense interaction of a family of mom and two well grown cubs (picture above) with a male that was wandering near by; we also saw two different couples mating, and finally a pair of young males walking together, apparently two brothers. www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] p.1 Tropical Birding - Trip Report BRAZIL: the Pantanal and Amazon – June/July 2019 INTRODUCTION: In this tour we combine some of the World’s best birding regions like the mega diverse Amazon rainforest, the seasonally flooded Pantanal plains, and just shortly the dry and unique Cerrado. This combination brings a HUGE amount of birds to our checklists out of which there are many of South America’s MEGAS, not only in terms of special birds but also in terms of “special bird families” (sbf – families that many tour participants haven’t seen before).
    [Show full text]
  • Agelaioides Badius), a Cooperatively Breeding Neotropical Blackbird Author(S): Cynthia A
    Kinship and genetic mating system of the Grayish Baywing (Agelaioides badius), a cooperatively breeding Neotropical blackbird Author(s): Cynthia A. Ursino, María Cecilia De Mársico, Juan Carlos Reboreda, and Christina Riehl Source: The Auk, 134(2):410-420. Published By: American Ornithological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/AUK-16-188.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1642/AUK-16-188.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Volume 134, 2017, pp. 410–420 DOI: 10.1642/AUK-16-188.1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Kinship and genetic mating system of the Grayish Baywing (Agelaioides badius), a cooperatively breeding Neotropical blackbird Cynthia
    [Show full text]
  • Evoluation of Brood Parasitism in Altricial Birds
    THE CONDOR VOLUME 67 SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER NUMBER 4 EVOLUTION OF BROOD PARASITISM IN ALTRICIAL BIRDS BY WILLIAM J. HAMILTON, III, and GORDON H. ORIANS Among the 8600 living species of birds there are about 75 brood parasites which make no nest, laying their eggs in the nests of other birds. Here we wish to examine the behavior patterns and environmental circumstances which may have led to the development of this form of parasitism. This will involve comparisons with the adap- tations of nonparasitic relatives of modern brood parasites. Thus, we are attempting to evaluate not only why modern brood parasites may have developed their unusual habits but also why certain close relatives have not. Brood parasitism has evolved independently a number of times in birds. Best known are the cuckoos, with a complex of Old World species (and three less special- ized New World species) highly specialized in the parasitic habit (Friedmann, 1933, 1948). Also, all the African honey guides (Indicatoridae) whose breeding biology is known are brood parasites (Friedmann, 1955). Among passerines brood parasitism has evolved independently in African weaver birds (Ploceidae) and in several species of blackbirds (Icteridae) . The only obligate parasite in precocial species is the South American Black-headed Duck (Hetermetta atricupilZu), but the North American Redhead (Aythyu americana) has populations at various stages of parasitism, from completely independent to complete brood parasitism (Weller, 1959). The inde- pendent evolution of brood parasitism in these diverse phyletic lines is clear. But brood parasitism has not necessarily evolved only once in each group. The poly- phyletic origin of such a specialized habit within a group might seem quite improb- able, but the conditions which might lead to the development of such a habit sug- gest that this is a possibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Success and Nestling Growth of the Baywing Parasitized by Screaming and Shiny Cowbirds
    Published by the Wilson Ornithological Society VOL. 122, NO. 3 September 2010 PAGES 417–634 The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122(3):417–431, 2010 REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND NESTLING GROWTH OF THE BAYWING PARASITIZED BY SCREAMING AND SHINY COWBIRDS MARI´AC.DE MA´ RSICO,1,2 BETTINA MAHLER,1 AND JUAN C. REBOREDA1 ABSTRACT.—We studied the breeding biology of the Baywing (Agelaioides badius), a shared host of Screaming (Molothrus rufoaxillaris) and Shiny (M. bonariensis) cowbirds. We monitored 193 nests from December 2002 to March 2007 in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Baywings used a wide variety of nesting sites, mainly old nests of furnarids. Their breeding season lasted from late November to February and was closely matched by that of Screaming Cowbirds. The breeding season for Shiny Cowbirds started in late September but overlapped that of Baywings. Frequency and intensity of Screaming Cowbird parasitism were 93% and 5 eggs per parasitized nest, while for Shiny Cowbirds they were 16% and 1.4 eggs. Host clutch size was 4.0 6 0.1 eggs and did not vary with time of breeding. Weight at hatching and age of maximum growth were similar for host and Screaming Cowbird nestlings. Shiny Cowbird nestlings had higher weight at hatching and lower age of maximum growth than the other two species. Screaming and Shiny cowbird nestlings had higher growth rates and asymptotic weights than host nestlings. Sex-specific growth curves of Screaming Cowbirds indicated males had higher growth rate and asymptotic weight than females. Only 19% of the nests produced fledglings. Host egg survival, hatching success, and nestling survival were 0.92, 0.88, and 0.94, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolivia's Avian Riches 2016 BIRDS
    Field Guides Tour Report Bolivia's Avian Riches 2016 Sep 3, 2016 to Sep 19, 2016 Dan Lane For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. Seeing several Cream-backed Woodpeckers this well was definitely one of the highlights of the tour. Photo by participant Brian Stech. Bolivia, as per usual, didn’t disappoint with some amazing scenery, great birds, and the occasional logistical challenge. Roadwork caused a few delays but, on occasion, actually gave us an unexpected opportunity to see a good bird! That Hellmayr’s Pipit in Siberia and the side road to search (and successfully find!) Red-fronted Macaw and a few other targets along the Mizque were both happy results, for example. But the tour gave us some other great memories: high on the list were the astounding views of several Cream-backed Woodpeckers—a rather reasonable stand-in for the Ivory-billed! We also reveled in our luck with the difficult Scimitar-winged Piha, which showed in spades for us! The boldly-patterned White-eared Solitaire and the colorful Band-tailed Fruiteater were other birds that ranked high on our lists of species seen. Others we appreciated were the bold Brown Tinamou that crossed the track in front of us, the moxie of that male Andean Hillstar that inspected us up close, the majesty of the Andean Condors we saw on several days, the startling plumage of the Red-tailed Comet, and the equally captivating Black-hooded Sunbeam, the more muted beauty of the Cochabamba Mountain-Finch, and the escaped jailbird plumage of the Barred Fruiteater.
    [Show full text]