DOCSLIB.ORG

Free Flow Power NOV 13 2013 Enid App.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Free Flow Power NOV 13 2013 Enid App.Pdf ENID LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO. 13703 FINAL LICENSE APPLICATION FOR INITIAL LICENSE - MAJOR MODIFIED PROJECT VOLUME I OF IV Free Flow Power Corporation 239 Causeway Street Boston, MA 02114 NOVEMBER 2013 ENID LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO. 13703 FINAL LICENSE APPLICATION CONTENT Volume I: Final License Application Initial Statement Exhibit A – Project Description Exhibit B – Project Operations and Resource Utilization (including Appendix B-1 Technical Memorandum – Hydraulic Analysis – Enid Outlet Works) Exhibit C – Construction History and Proposed Construction Schedule Exhibit D – Statement of Costs and Financing Exhibit E – Environmental Exhibit Exhibit F – General Design Drawings (drawings in Volume III) Exhibit G – Project Maps Volume II: Appendices Appendix A – Consultation Documentation Appendix B – Study Plans Appendix C – Study Reports Appendix D – Literature Cited Appendix E – Exhibit E Appendices (Exclusive) Volume III: Critical Energy Infrastructure Information (Per regulations filed separately with FERC and dam owner only) Exhibit F – General Design Drawings and Preliminary Supporting Design Report Volume IV: Cultural Resources Study Report and Consultation (Contains privileged information – Not for public release) ENID LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO. 13703 FINAL LICENSE APPLICATION VOLUME I OF IV TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................ES-1 INITIAL STATEMENT ............................................................................................................. IS-1 EXHIBIT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................ A-1 A.1 Physical Composition ......................................................................................... A-1 A.1.1 Existing Non-Project Facilities ............................................................... A-1 A.1.2 Proposed Project Facilities ..................................................................... A-2 A.1.2.1 Physical Composition ........................................................... A-2 A.1.2.1.1 Existing Intake ....................................................... A-4 A.1.2.1.2 Existing Outlet Conduit and Proposed Conduit Liner ..................................................................... A-4 A.1.2.1.3 Proposed Bifurcation Chamber ............................. A-5 A.1.2.1.4 Proposed Discharge Gate ...................................... A-5 A.1.2.1.5 Proposed Hydro Intake Gate ................................. A-5 A.1.2.1.6 Proposed Penstock ................................................. A-6 A.1.2.1.7 Proposed Forebay .................................................. A-6 A.1.2.1.8 Proposed Powerhouse ........................................... A-7 A.1.2.1.9 Proposed Tailrace .................................................. A-7 A.2 Impoundment Characteristics ............................................................................. A-7 A.3 Generating Equipment ........................................................................................ A-7 A.4 Transmission Facilities ....................................................................................... A-8 A.5 Appurtenant Equipment .................................................................................... A-10 A.6 Lands of the United States ................................................................................ A-10 EXHIBIT B PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION ........................B-1 B.1 Alternative Sites Considered................................................................................B-1 B.2 Alternative Facility Designs, Processes and Operations Considered ..................B-1 B.3 Statement of Project Operations ..........................................................................B-3 B.3.1 Existing USACE Operation .....................................................................B-3 B.3.2 Proposed Hydroelectric Project Operation ..............................................B-7 B.3.2.1 Mode of Operation (Manual or Automatic) ............................B-9 B.3.2.2 Annual Plant Factor...............................................................B-10 B.3.2.3 Operation During Adverse, Mean and High Water Years ....B-10 B.4 Dependable Capacity and Average Annual Energy Production ........................B-12 B.4.1 Streamflow Records ...............................................................................B-13 B.4.1.1 Minimum, Mean, and Maximum Recorded Flows ...............B-13 B.4.1.2 Flow Duration Curves ...........................................................B-13 B.4.1.3 Critical Streamflow for Dependable Capacity ......................B-21 TOC-1 ©FFP, 2013 Table of Contents B.4.2 Area Capacity Curve and Rule Curve ....................................................B-21 B.4.3 Hydraulic Capacity ................................................................................B-21 B.4.4 Tailwater Rating Curve ..........................................................................B-22 B.4.5 Powerplant Capability Versus Head ......................................................B-22 B.5 Statement of System and Regional Power Needs ..............................................B-22 B.6 Applicant's Plans for Future Development ........................................................B-25 APPENDIX TM-ENID TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM - HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS –ENID OUTLET WORKS ..................................................................... TM-1 EXHIBIT C CONSTRUCTION HISTORY ...........................................................................C-1 C.1 Construction History ............................................................................................C-1 C.2 Proposed Construction Schedule .........................................................................C-1 EXHIBIT D STATEMENT OF COSTS AND FINANCING ................................................ D-1 D.1 Estimate of New Construction Costs .................................................................. D-1 D.2 Approximate Original Cost ................................................................................. D-1 D.3 Takeover Cost ..................................................................................................... D-2 D.4 Estimate of Average Annual Costs ..................................................................... D-2 D.5 Estimate of Annual Value of Power ................................................................... D-3 D.6 Energy Alternatives ............................................................................................ D-3 D.7 Consequences of Application Denial .................................................................. D-4 D.8 Source and Extent of Financing .......................................................................... D-5 D.9 Estimate of Cost to Develop License Application .............................................. D-5 D.10 Estimate of On-Peak and Off-Peak Values of Power ......................................... D-5 EXHIBIT E ENVIRONMENTAL EXHIBIT ......................................................................... E-1 E.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... E-1 E.1.1 Overview of Proposed Project ................................................................. E-1 E.1.2 General Description of the Locale ........................................................... E-3 E.1.2.1 Yazoo River Basin – Yocona River Watershed ...................... E-3 E.1.2.2 Yocona River Basin Physiography ......................................... E-5 E.1.2.3 Project Area Climate ............................................................... E-8 E.1.2.4 Yocona River Tributaries ........................................................ E-9 E.2 Report on Water Use and Quality ...................................................................... E-12 E.2.1 Water Use ............................................................................................... E-12 E.2.1.1 Estimated Quantities of Water Discharged from the Proposed Project for Power Production ................................................ E-12 E.2.1.2 Other Existing and Proposed Water Uses ............................. E-13 E.2.1.2.1 Water Withdrawals ............................................... E-13 E.2.1.2.2 Water Discharges ................................................. E-14 E.2.1.2.3 USACE Enid Lake Operations ............................. E-14 E.2.1.3 Other Instream Flow Uses ..................................................... E-14 E.2.2 Water Quantity ....................................................................................... E-14 E.2.3 Water Quality ......................................................................................... E-15 E.2.4 Existing Water Quality Information ...................................................... E-15 E.2.4.1 Enid Reservoir Intake- Upstream Water Quality Data ......... E-19 E.2.4.2 Yocona River- Downstream Water Quality Data ................. E-21 E.2.4.3 Comparison between Intake and Downstream Data ............. E-23 TOC-2 ©FFP, 2013 Table of Contents E.2.5 Impoundment Characteristics ................................................................ E-24 E.2.6 Potential Project Effects on Water Use and Quality .............................. E-25 E.2.6.1 Potential Temporary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Percidae: Etheostoma Raneyi) in Disjunct Watersheds of Northern Mississippi
    University of Mississippi eGrove Faculty and Student Publications Biology 1-1-2020 Cryptic diversity among Yazoo Darters (Percidae: Etheostoma raneyi) in disjunct watersheds of northern Mississippi Ken A. Sterling USDA Forest Service Stuart V. Nielsen Florida Museum of Natural History Andrew J. Brown Louisiana Purchase Gardens and Zoo Melvin L. Warren USDA Forest Service Brice P. Noonan University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/biology_facpubs Recommended Citation Sterling KA, Nielsen SV, Brown AJ, Warren, Jr. ML, Noonan BP. 2020. Cryptic diversity among Yazoo Darters (Percidae: Etheostoma raneyi) in disjunct watersheds of northern Mississippi. PeerJ 8:e9014 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9014 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty and Student Publications by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cryptic diversity among Yazoo Darters (Percidae: Etheostoma raneyi) in disjunct watersheds of northern Mississippi Ken A. Sterling1, Stuart V. Nielsen2, Andrew J. Brown3, Melvin L. Warren, Jr.1 and Brice P. Noonan4 1 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Stream Ecology Laboratory, Oxford, MS, United States of America 2 Division of Herpetology, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, FL, United States of America 3 Louisiana Purchase Gardens and Zoo, Monroe, LA, United States of America 4 Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, United States of America ABSTRACT The Yazoo Darter, Etheostoma raneyi (Percidae), is an imperiled freshwater fish species endemic to tributaries of the Yocona and Little Tallahatchie rivers of the upper Yazoo River basin, in northern Mississippi, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Hills-Leake TL EA Draft
    Document Type: EA-Administrativ e Record Index Field: Env ironmental Assessment Project Name: Oxf ord-Cof feeville 161-kV TL Project Number: 2017-15 OXFORD-COFFEEVILLE 161-KV TRANSMISSION LINE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Lafayette and Yalobusha Counties, Mississippi Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Chattanooga, Tennessee February 2019 Direct Questions to: Anita E. Masters NEPA Program and Valley Projects Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, BR 4A Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 This page intentionally left blank Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Proposed Action – Improve Power Supply ........................................................................ 1 1.2 Need for the Proposed Action .......................................................................................... 2 1.3 Decisions to be Made...................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Related Environmental Reviews or Documentation ........................................................... 5 1.5 Scoping Process and Public Involvement ......................................................................... 5 1.6 Issues to be Addressed ................................................................................................... 6 1.7 Necessary Federal Permits and Licens es ......................................................................... 7 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Percidae: Etheostoma Raneyi) in Disjunct Watersheds of Northern Mississippi
    Cryptic diversity among Yazoo Darters (Percidae: Etheostoma raneyi) in disjunct watersheds of northern Mississippi Ken A. Sterling1, Stuart V. Nielsen2, Andrew J. Brown3, Melvin L. Warren, Jr.1 and Brice P. Noonan4 1 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Stream Ecology Laboratory, Oxford, MS, United States of America 2 Division of Herpetology, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, FL, United States of America 3 Louisiana Purchase Gardens and Zoo, Monroe, LA, United States of America 4 Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, United States of America ABSTRACT The Yazoo Darter, Etheostoma raneyi (Percidae), is an imperiled freshwater fish species endemic to tributaries of the Yocona and Little Tallahatchie rivers of the upper Yazoo River basin, in northern Mississippi, USA. The two populations are allopatric, isolated by unsuitable lowland habitat between the two river drainages. Relevant literature suggests that populations in the Yocona River represent an undescribed species, but a lack of data prevents a thorough evaluation of possible diversity throughout the range of the species. Our goals were to estimate phylogenetic relationships of the Yazoo Darter across its distribution and identify cryptic diversity for conservation management purposes. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene returned two reciprocally monophyletic clades representing the two river drainages with high support. Bayesian analysis of cytb was consistent with the ML analysis but with low support for the Yocona River clade. Analyses of the nuclear S7 gene yielded unresolved relationships among individuals in the Little Tallahatchie River drainage with mostly low support, but returned a monophyletic clade for individuals from the Yocona River drainage with high support.
    [Show full text]
  • JASPER CREEK WATERSHED BASED PLAN June 30, 2019
    JASPER CREEK WATERSHED BASED PLAN June 30, 2019 Jasper Creek Watershed Based Plan HUC 080302010404 Prepared for: Jasper Creek Watershed Implementation Team Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality Prepared by: Mississippi Soil and Water Conservation Commission 680 Monroe St., Suite B Jackson, MS 39202 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Vision Statement ............................................................................................................................. 3 Mission Statement ........................................................................................................................... 3 Watershed Implementation Team ................................................................................................... 4 Watershed Description .................................................................................................................... 5 Stakeholder Interest ........................................................................................................................ 8 Water Resources ............................................................................................................................. 8 History of Activity in the Watershed .......................................................................................... 8 Wildlife and Fisheries ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Fishes Council 44Th Annual Meeting Hickory Knob State Park, Mccormick, SC November 7‐10, 2018
    Southeastern Fishes Council 44th Annual Meeting Hickory Knob State Park, McCormick, SC November 7‐10, 2018 Wednesday, Nov 7th 4:00‐10:00 pm Registration (Great Hall in main Lodge) 6:00‐10:00 pm Welcome Reception (Great Hall in main Lodge) Thursday, Nov 8th 7:00‐8:30 am Breakfast buffet available in Lodge Restaurant 8:00 am Registration (at the Barn) 8:30‐10:00 am Welcome and Presentation Session (at the Barn) 10:00 am Morning break 10:15‐11:45 am Presentation Session (at the Barn) Noon Lunch buffet available in Lodge Restaurant 1:30‐2:30 pm Presentation Session (at the Barn) 2:30 pm Afternoon break 2:45‐3:50 pm Presentation Session (at the Barn) 4:00‐5:30 pm SFC Business Meeting (at the Barn) 5:30‐6:30 Poster set up (at the Barn) 6:30‐8:30 pm Poster Session Social (at the Barn) 9:00‐11:00 pm Auction (Great Hall in main Lodge) Friday, Nov 9th 7:00‐8:30 am Breakfast buffet available in Lodge Restaurant 8:30‐10:00 am Presentation Session (at the Barn) 10:00 am Morning break 10:15‐11:45 am Presentation Session (at the Barn) Noon Lunch buffet available in Lodge Restaurant 1:30‐2:15 pm Presentation Session (at the Barn) 2:30‐3:00 pm Awards Ceremony 5:00‐7:00 pm Dinner buffet available in Lodge Restaurant Sundown Bonfire at the firepit Saturday, Nov 10th 7:00‐8:30 am Breakfast buffet available in Lodge Restaurant 9:00‐12:00 am Field Trip to Long Cane Creek Southeastern Fishes Council 2018 Annual Meeting TECHNICAL PROGRAM Thursday: early morning - Brett Albanese, moderator 8:30.
    [Show full text]
  • A Zoom Link Will Be Sent out to Registered Individuals the Week of the Meeting
    Southeastern Fishes Council 46th Annual Meeting Virtual Meeting via Zoom November 19‐20, 2020 All times are in Central Time Zone Thursday, Nov 19th 9:00‐10:30 am Welcome and Presentation Session 10:30 am Morning break 10:45‐12:00 pm Presentation Session Noon Lunch break 1:30‐2:40 pm Presentation Session 2:40-2:50 pm Discussion 2:50 pm Afternoon break 3:00‐4:00 pm Presentation Session Friday, Nov 20th 9:00‐10:15 am Presentation Session 10:15 am Morning break 10:35‐10:50 am Presentation Session 10:50-11:00 am Discussion 11:00 am Business Meeting 12:00 pm Awards Ceremony 1:30-5:00 pm Workshop: Introduction to Geometric Morphometrics in R A zoom link will be sent out to registered individuals the week of the meeting. When you join, your video and microphone will be set to off. If you wish to ask a question, enter it into the chat, and meeting moderators will present the questions at the end of the talk. For lightning talks, questions can be asked during the designated discussion period or at scheduled breaks. Emails have been included with every abstract if you have additional questions for the presenter. Southeastern Fishes Council 2020 Annual Meeting TECHNICAL PROGRAM (presenter in bold) All times are in Central Time Zone Thursday: early morning 9:00. Brian Alford, Chair Introductory remarks 9:15. Kearstin Findley, Henry L. Bart Jr., Kyle R. Piller *Student Presentation (G) Distributional assessment of six imperiled freshwater fish species in Louisiana 9:30.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Lifetime Growth in Percid Fishes
    Chapter 19 The Ecology of Lifetime Growth in Percid Fishes Michael D. Rennie and Paul A. Venturelli Abstract The factors responsible for the lifetime growth patterns of percids in natural populations can provide meaningful insights for culture operations. Here, we present a summary of a number of well-studied factors and review the current state of knowledge. We illustrate an informative approach to describe lifetime growth of percid species by applying a biphasic growth model to European perch and pikeperch populations, and discuss life-history constraints considering biphasic growth. An evaluation of proposed hypotheses for proximate mechanisms of female- biased sexual size dimorphism in percids is presented, indicating that reduced feed- ing in males is the most parsimonious explanation given the current evidence. Growth rates in percids are strongly temperature-dependent, and show strong evi- dence of countergradient growth. Percids also show significant density-­dependent growth, demonstrating twofold variation in individual growth rates. Predation, food availability and prey particle size can also affect the efficiency of percid growth. Parasitism and disease in percids are not as well studied as other factors reviewed here within an ecological context, but the reported effects on percid growth vary from negative to neutral to positive. Our review of drivers of natural variation in percid growth will assist culture operators with regards to broodstock selection, husbandry and maintenance of cultured percids. Keywords Percids • Growth • Broodstock selection • Sex dimorphism • Husbandry M.D. Rennie (*) Department of Biology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, P7B 5E1 Thunder Bay, ON, Canada e-mail: [email protected] P.A. Venturelli Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, 135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle, 55108 St.
    [Show full text]
  • 01Wetlands Proceedings Covers
    FOREST LINKAGES TO DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE IN LOWLAND STREAM FISH COMMUNITIES Melvin L. Warren, Jr., Wendell R. Haag, and Susan B. Adams1 Abstract—In 1999 we sampled fish and fish habitat in 79 stream reaches within watersheds of north-central Mississippi. Despite a program of successful reforestation and soil stabilization (Yazoo-Little Tallahatchie Project, 1949–1985), nearly all streams in the region are channelized or incised. In these sandy, upper Coastal Plain streams, we explored the relationships among in-stream wood, canopy cover, and stream fish assemblages and were particularly interested in how these relation- ships are affected by extensive channel modification. Minnows, sunfishes, darters, and catfishes, respectively, dominated the fauna. Total fish species, total fish abundance, minnow relative abundance, and canopy cover were related only to watershed size. Stream incision, as indicated by high banks and shallow water depths, showed negative associations with sunfish relative abundance, in-stream wood, and detritus. Flow and large in-stream wood were associated positively with relative abundances of darters and catfishes. Despite scarcity of wood and deep pools in these systems, we detected associations between fish assemblage composition and in-stream wood. Our analysis suggests even modest densities of in-stream wood can shift fish assemblage attributes from colonizing stages to intermediate or stable stages. INTRODUCTION others 1994, 1998). Although not focused on riparian areas, Large-scale reforestation emphasizing riparian zones can the reforestation effort successfully stabilized hillslopes and dramatically affect fish communities of low-gradient Coastal dramatically increased forest cover of the region. Plain streams. Forested riparian zones provide multiple benefits to stream fishes (Angermeier and Karr 1984, In 1999 we sampled fish and fish habitat in streams within Gregory and others 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • NRSA 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Appendices (Pdf)
    National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Appendix A: Equipment & Supplies Appendix Equipment A: & Supplies A-1 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 pendix Equipment A: & Supplies Ap A-2 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Base Kit: A Base Kit will be provided to the field crews for all sampling sites that they will go to. Some items are sent in the base kit as extra supplies to be used as needed. Item Quantity Protocol Antibiotic Salve 1 Fish plug Centrifuge tube stand 1 Chlorophyll A Centrifuge tubes (screw-top, 50-mL) (extras) 5 Chlorophyll A Periphyton Clinometer 1 Physical Habitat CST Berger SAL 20 Automatic Level 1 Physical Habitat Delimiter – 12 cm2 area 1 Periphyton Densiometer - Convex spherical (modified with taped V) 1 Physical Habitat D-frame Kick Net (500 µm mesh, 52” handle) 1 Benthics Filteration flask (with silicone stopped and adapter) 1 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Fish weigh scale(s) 1 Fish plug Fish Voucher supplies 1 pack Fish Voucher Foil squares (aluminum, 3x6”) 1 pack Chlorophyll A Periphyton Gloves (nitrile) 1 box General Graduated cylinder (25 mL) 1 Periphyton Graduated cylinder (250 mL) 1 Chlorophyll A, Periphyton HDPE bottle (1 L, white, wide-mouth) (extras) 12 Benthics, Fish Vouchers HDPE bottle (500 mL, white, wide-mouth) with graduations 1 Periphyton Laboratory pipette bulb 1 Fish Plug Microcentrifuge tubes containing glass beads
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Discussion Piece Spawning Substrate Preferences of the Yazoo Darter (Etheostoma Raneyi)
    Am. Midl. Nat. (2020) 183:252–259 Notes and Discussion Piece Spawning Substrate Preferences of the Yazoo Darter (Etheostoma raneyi) ABSTRACT.—The Yazoo Darter Etheostoma raneyi is a small imperiled snubnose darter endemic to Upper Gulf Coastal Plain streams in north-central Mississippi. Installation of rip- rap and wood is being considered in an effort to increase suitable habitat and spawning substrate for the species. In common with other snubnose darters, Yazoo Darters attach their eggs to appropriate spawning substrate. However, it is not known if Yazoo Darters, or other imperiled Coastal Plain snubnose darters, will use rock substrate for spawning given it is almost entirely absent from streams of occurrence. If Yazoo Darters show no preference between wood and rock (rip-rap) for spawning, management would have greater flexibility when designing stream habitat installations for imperiled Coastal Plain snubnose darters, because the installation of rip-rap is much less expensive and time consuming than installation of wood. We used a randomized block experiment in an outdoor mesocosm facility to test for spawning substrate preferences. We counted .7600 eggs and Yazoo Darters used both substrates but used wood more than twice as often as rip-rap. Though we cannot recommend habitat installations using only rip-rap, any installation using a mix of wood and rip-rap will enhance spawning habitat for the Yazoo Darter and at least four other imperiled Coastal Plain snubnose darters. INTRODUCTION The Yazoo Darter Etheostoma raneyi, is an imperiled, small (,65mm SL), benthic insectivore endemic to perennial headwater streams in the Little Tallahatchie River watershed (upper Yazoo River basin) of the Upper Gulf Coastal Plain of north-central Mississippi (Suttkus et al., 1994; Johnston and Haag, 1996; Sterling et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a New Species of Cryptic Snubnose Darter (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) Endemic to North-Central Mississippi
    Description of a New Species of Cryptic Snubnose Darter (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) Endemic to North-Central Mississippi Ken A. Sterling1* and Melvin L. Warren, Jr1. 1USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Stream Ecology Laboratory, 1000 Front Street, Oxford, MS 38655 *corresponding author: [email protected] Supplemental tables and figures Table S1. Estimated stream gradients and watershed area for Yazoo Darters in the Yocona (Y.R.) and Little Tallahatchie (L.T.R.) river drainages. Data is for all streams yielding Yazoo Darters but not including collections from the mainstem L.T.R. or Otoucalofa Creek (see Sterling et al., 2013); U.T. = unnamed tributary, Cr. = creek Drainage Stream Lat. Long. Area (km²) Gradient Y.R. U.T. Otoucalofa Cr. 2 34.141 -89.589 3.43 0.920 Y.R. Mill Cr. 34.166 -89.52 5.6 0.933 Y.R. Moore Cr. 34.156 -89.548 8.1 0.958 Y.R. Shippy Cr. 34.153 -89.433 8.7 0.681 Y.R. U.T. Otoucalofa Cr. 1 34.125 -89.61 10.1 0.874 Y.R. Gordon Branch 34.14 -89.549 12.3 1.139 Y.R. Morris Cr. 34.283 -89.544 13.5 0.555 Y.R. Spring Cr. 34.153 -89.529 13.9 0.876 Y.R. Smith Cr. B 34.138 -89.474 13.9 0.587 Y.R. Smith Cr. A 34.168 -89.438 17.2 0.802 Y.R. Johnston Cr. 34.123 -89.641 24.3 0.472 Y.R. Taylor Cr. 34.296 -89.588 29.4 0.597 Y.R.
    [Show full text]