DOCSLIB.ORG

Protecting the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion 100 Under the European Convention 95

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Jim Murdoch Protecting the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion 100 under the European Convention 95 on Human Rights 75 25 5 Council of Europe human rights handbooks 0 hb9.book Page 1 Monday, January 23, 2012 3:48 PM Jim Murdoch Protecting the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion under the European Convention on Human Rights Council of Europe human rights handbooks Council of Europe Strasbourg, 2012 hb9.book Page 2 Monday, January 23, 2012 3:48 PM Jim Murdoch is Professor of Public Law at the University of The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the Glasgow, and was formerly Head of the School of Law. His author and do not engage the responsibility of the Council of research interests are in domestic and European human rights Europe. They should not be regarded as placing upon the law. He is a regular participant in Council of Europe seminar legal instruments mentioned in it any official interpretation programme visits to central and east European states and has capable of binding the governments of member states, the developed a particular interest in non-judicial human rights Council of Europe’s statutory organs or any organ set up by enforcement mechanisms. virtue of the European Convention on Human Rights. Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex www.coe.int/justice © Council of Europe, 2012 Cover illustration © rolffimages – Fotolia.com 1st printing, February 2012 Printed at the Council of Europe hb9.book Page 3 Monday, January 23, 2012 3:48 PM Contents Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights . 5 Question 3. Does the limitation on manifestation of religion or belief have a legitimate aim? . 35 Preface . 6 Question 4. Is the limitation on “manifestation” of Freedom of thought, conscience and religion: religion or belief “prescribed by law”?. 37 international and regional standards . 9 Question 5. Is the limitation on “manifestation” of religion or belief “necessary in a democratic society”?. 39 Interpreting Article 9 of the Convention: general Necessity and proportionality; and the nature of considerations . 12 “democratic society” . 40 Introduction . 12 Margin of appreciation . 41 Applying Article 9: the checklist of key questions . 13 Specific aspects of freedom of thought, conscience and Question 1: Does the complaint fall within the scope of belief arising under Article 9 . 44 Article 9?. 14 Interferences with “manifestation” of individual belief: What is meant by “thought, conscience and religion”? . 16 refusal to undertake compulsory military service . 44 The forum internum . 18 Interferences with “manifestation” of individual belief: Manifestations of religion or belief . 21 proselytism . 46 The collective aspect of Article 9 . 23 The collective aspect of Article 9 and recognition of Interferences with “manifestation” of individual belief: “victim” status . 24 sanctions for wearing of religious symbols . 49 Limits to the scope of Article 9 . 26 Interferences with individual belief: the requirement to pay Question 2: Has there been any interference with “church tax” . 52 Article 9 rights? . 26 Individual “manifestation” of belief: prisoners and religious Positive obligations . 28 Employment and freedom of thought, conscience and belief . 54 religion . 30 The requirement of state neutrality: registration of religious Permitting due recognition of religious practices . 33 faiths, etc. 55 3 hb9.book Page 4 Monday, January 23, 2012 3:48 PM COUNCIL OF EUROPE HUMAN RIGHTS HANDBOOKS The requirement of state neutrality: controls upon places Medical treatment issues: Article 8 . 73 of worship . 60 State recognition of decisions of ecclesiastical bodies: The requirement of state neutrality: interfering in internal Article 6 . 74 disputes between adherents of a religious community . 62 Discrimination on the basis of religion or belief . 74 Related guarantees under the Convention having an Article 14 . 75 impact upon the free exercise of conscience or belief . 66 Religious convictions and education: Article 2 of Protocol No. 12. 80 Protocol No. 1 . 66 Conclusion . 82 Freedom of expression and thought, conscience and belief: Article 10 . 69 Index of cases . 86 4 hb9.book Page 5 Monday, January 23, 2012 3:48 PM Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights Freedom of thought, conscience and religion 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience 2. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or in worship, teaching, practice and observance. for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. 5 hb9.book Page 6 Monday, January 23, 2012 3:48 PM Preface This handbook examines the scope and content of freedom of can it extend to discussion of the question as to what weight thought, conscience and religion as guaranteed in particular by domestic law requires to be given to the Convention. Whether Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights and as the European Convention on Human Rights is considered as interpreted by the case-law of the European Court of Human superior law or merely has persuasive force in domestic law is Rights (“the Strasbourg Court”) and by the former European clearly of importance, but whether or not the treaty overrides Commission on Human Rights (“the Commission”). 1 national law, it is still possible to state with some certainty the key considerations a domestic judge or public official must bear The primary responsibility for applying Convention guarantees in mind in relevant cases in decision-making at national level. lies at the national level. The aim is thus to provide a concise guide to assist judges, relevant state officials and practising Article 9 jurisprudence may not be particularly voluminous in lawyers who need an understanding of European Convention contrast to the case-law generated by other provisions of the on Human Rights case-law in applying the treaty in domestic Convention, but the case-law in this area it is often of some 2 law and administrative practice. The standards and expecta- complexity. Much is of comparatively recent origin, and while tions found in the European Convention on Human Rights may certain aspects of freedom of thought, conscience and belief apply across Europe, but the subsidiary nature of the scheme of remain to be considered by the Court as it has not yet had the protection categorically requires the domestic decision-maker opportunity to provide an authoritative interpretation for all – and above all, the domestic judge – to give effect to these aspects of the subject, a number of important decisions and rights in national law and practice. This work, of course, can judgments help clarify the application, nature and importance only be an introductory text and not a definitive treatise. Nor 2. Violations of Article 9 have been found in 35 judgments between 1959 and 2010 (9 have concerned Greece, 5 Russia, 4 Bulgaria, 3 in respect of Latvia, Moldova 1. In the interests of readability, the text generally refers only to the title of cases, Turkey, and Ukraine, and 1 in respect of Austria, Georgia, Poland, San Marino, with full references of judgments cited appearing in the index of cases, page 86. and Switzerland): European Court Annual Report 2010 (2011), pp 157-158. The All the Court’s judgments, and a significant selection of decisions and reports, first such judgment establishing a violation of Article 9 – Kokkinakis v. Greece , are published in the HUDOC database, accessible at http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/. discussed below at p. 36 ff – was delivered in 1993. 6 Preface hb9.book Page 7 Monday, January 23, 2012 3:48 PM PROTECTING THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION of the guarantee. The provision confers protection for an indi- put it, a “moderated doctrine of precedent” is employed by the vidual’s core belief system and for the right to manifest such European Court of Human Rights (“the Strasbourg Court”) to beliefs either individually or with others, and both in private as give guidance to national courts and decision-makers on the well as in the public sphere. The case-law clarifies that state development of human rights protection. 3 This “doctrine of authorities may not only be required to desist from taking precedent” is necessary in the interests of legal certainty and action which would interfere with thought, conscience and reli- equality before the law. Yet it is “moderated” by the need to gion, but also in certain circumstances to take positive meas- ensure that the Convention continues to reflect changes in ures to nurture and to protect this freedom. The range of issues society’s aspirations and values. The Convention is thus a that may arise under Article 9 is wide: for example, should the “living instrument”. 4 Examination of the case-law also allows an display of religious symbols be prohibited in state premises? appreciation of the fundamental values which underpin this when may the criminal law prohibit attempts at proselytism? is jurisprudence. These underlying assumptions are often dis- there a responsibility to recognise exemptions to the duty to cernible from the Strasbourg Court’s decisions and judgments undertake military service? can oaths of allegiance be required as the opportunity has been taken to elaborate the principles of public officials or democratically-elected representatives? or which should be followed by domestic courts and policy- is it permissible to prohibit the building of minarets, or the makers. There is thus an important predictive aspect to the wearing of headscarves? Such questions can – and do – arise Strasbourg Court’s case-law, for while in particular instances on a not infrequent basis in political debate.
Recommended publications
  • Convention Theory: Is There a French School of Organizational Institutionalism?

    Convention Theory: Is There a French School of Organizational Institutionalism?

    CONVENTION THEORY : IS THERE A FRENCH SCHOOL OF ORGANIZATIONAL INSTITUTIONALISM? Thibault Daudigeos, Bertrand Valiorgue To cite this version: Thibault Daudigeos, Bertrand Valiorgue. CONVENTION THEORY : IS THERE A FRENCH SCHOOL OF ORGANIZATIONAL INSTITUTIONALISM?. 2010. hal-00512374 HAL Id: hal-00512374 http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00512374 Preprint submitted on 30 Aug 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. "CONVENTION THEORY": IS THERE A FRENCH SCHOOL OF ORGANIZATIONAL INSTITUTIONALISM? Thibault Daudigeos Grenoble Ecole de Management Chercheur Associé, Institut Français de Gouvernement des Entreprises [email protected] Bertrand Valiorgue ESC Clermont Chercheur Associé, Institut Français de Gouvernement des Entreprises [email protected] We thank the participants of the NIW2010 and AIMS 2010 workshops for their insightful comments. 1 "CONVENTION THEORY": IS THERE A FRENCH SCHOOL OF ORGANIZATIONAL INSTITUTIONALISM? ABSTRACT This paper highlights overlap and differences between Convention Theory and New Organizational Institutionalism and thus states the strong case for profitable dialog. It shows how the former can facilitate new institutional approaches. First, convention theory rounds off the model of institutionalized action by turning the spotlight to the role of evaluation in the coordination effort.
  • David Lewis on Convention

    David Lewis on Convention

    David Lewis on Convention Ernie Lepore and Matthew Stone Center for Cognitive Science Rutgers University David Lewis’s landmark Convention starts its exploration of the notion of a convention with a brilliant insight: we need a distinctive social competence to solve coordination problems. Convention, for Lewis, is the canonical form that this social competence takes when it is grounded in agents’ knowledge and experience of one another’s self-consciously flexible behavior. Lewis meant for his theory to describe a wide range of cultural devices we use to act together effectively; but he was particularly concerned in applying this notion to make sense of our knowledge of meaning. In this chapter, we give an overview of Lewis’s theory of convention, and explore its implications for linguistic theory, and especially for problems at the interface of the semantics and pragmatics of natural language. In §1, we discuss Lewis’s understanding of coordination problems, emphasizing how coordination allows for a uniform characterization of practical activity and of signaling in communication. In §2, we introduce Lewis’s account of convention and show how he uses it to make sense of the idea that a linguistic expression can come to be associated with its meaning by a convention. Lewis’s account has come in for a lot of criticism, and we close in §3 by addressing some of the key difficulties in thinking of meaning as conventional in Lewis’s sense. The critical literature on Lewis’s account of convention is much wider than we can fully survey in this chapter, and so we recommend for a discussion of convention as a more general phenomenon Rescorla (2011).
  • The Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion Or Belief

    The Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion Or Belief

    Level 1, 4 Campion St 594 St Kilda Rd DEAKIN ACT 2600 MELBOURNE VIC 3004 T 02 6259 0431 T 02 6171 7446 E [email protected] E [email protected] 14 February 2018 The Expert Panel on Religious Freedom C/o Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet By email: [email protected] RE: Submission to the Commonwealth Expert Panel on Religious Freedom 1. The Human Rights Law Alliance and the Australian Christian Lobby welcome this opportunity to make a submission to the Inquiry into the Status of the Human Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief. 2. The Human Rights Law Alliance implements legal strategies to protect and promote fundamental human rights. It does this by resourcing legal cases with funding and expertise to create rights-protecting legal precedents. The Alliance is especially concerned to protect and promote the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief. In the past 24 months, the Alliance has aided more than 30 legal cases, and allied lawyers appeared in State Tribunals and Magistrates, District and Supreme Courts as well as the Federal Court. 3. With more than 100,000 supporters, ACL facilitates professional engagement and dialogue between the Christian constituency and government, allowing the voice of Christians to be heard in the public square. ACL is neither party partisan or denominationally aligned. ACL representatives bring a Christian perspective to policy makers in Federal, State and Territory parliaments. 4. This submission focusses on the intersection between freedom of religion and other human rights first in international law, second in Australian law, and third in the lived experience of Australians.
  • Guide on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights

    Guide on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights

    Guide on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights Freedom of thought, Conscience and religion Updated on 30 April 2021 This Guide has been prepared by the Registry and does not bind the Court. Guide on Article 9 of the Convention – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion Publishers or organisations wishing to translate and/or reproduce all or part of this report in the form of a printed or electronic publication are invited to contact [email protected] for information on the authorisation procedure. If you wish to know which translations of the Case-Law Guides are currently under way, please see Pending translations. This Guide was originally drafted in French. It is updated regularly and, most recently, on 30 April 2021. It may be subject to editorial revision. The Case-Law Guides are available for downloading at www.echr.coe.int (Case-law – Case-law analysis – Case-law guides). For publication updates please follow the Court’s Twitter account at https://twitter.com/ECHR_CEDH. © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, 2021 European Court of Human Rights 2/99 Last update: 30.04.2021 Guide on Article 9 of the Convention – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion Table of contents Note to readers .............................................................................................. 5 Introduction ................................................................................................... 6 I. General principles and applicability ........................................................... 8 A. The importance of Article 9 of the Convention in a democratic society and the locus standi of religious bodies ............................................................................................................ 8 B. Convictions protected under Article 9 ........................................................................................ 8 C. The right to hold a belief and the right to manifest it .............................................................. 11 D.
  • Pragmatic Reasoning and Semantic Convention: a Case Study on Gradable Adjectives*

    Pragmatic Reasoning and Semantic Convention: a Case Study on Gradable Adjectives*

    Pragmatic Reasoning and Semantic Convention: A Case Study on Gradable Adjectives* Ming Xiang, Christopher Kennedy, Weijie Xu and Timothy Leffel University of Chicago Abstract Gradable adjectives denote properties that are relativized to contextual thresholds of application: how long an object must be in order to count as long in a context of utterance depends on what the threshold is in that context. But thresholds are variable across contexts and adjectives, and are in general uncertain. This leads to two questions about the meanings of gradable adjectives in particular contexts of utterance: what truth conditions are they understood to introduce, and what information are they taken to communicate? In this paper, we consider two kinds of answers to these questions, one from semantic theory, and one from Bayesian pragmatics, and assess them relative to human judgments about truth and communicated information. Our findings indicate that although the Bayesian accounts accurately model human judgments about what is communicated, they do not capture human judgments about truth conditions unless also supplemented with the threshold conventions postulated by semantic theory. Keywords: Gradable adjectives, Bayesian pragmatics, context dependence, semantic uncer- tainty 1 Introduction 1.1 Gradable adjectives and threshold uncertainty Gradable adjectives are predicative expressions whose semantic content is based on a scalar concept that supports orderings of the objects in their domains. For example, the gradable adjectives long and short order relative to height; heavy and light order relative to weight, and so on. Non-gradable adjectives like digital and next, on the other hand, are not associated with a scalar concept, at least not grammatically.
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child

    Convention on the Rights of the Child

    Convention on the Rights of the Child Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989 entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article 49 Preamble The States Parties to the present Convention, Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Bearing in mind that the peoples of the United Nations have, in the Charter, reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights and in the dignity and worth of the human person, and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Recognizing that the United Nations has, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenants on Human Rights, proclaimed and agreed that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, Recalling that, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations has proclaimed that childhood is entitled to special care and assistance, Convinced that the family, as the fundamental group of society and the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all its members and particularly children, should be afforded
  • On Flew's Compatibilism and His Objections to Theistic Libertarianism

    On Flew's Compatibilism and His Objections to Theistic Libertarianism

    On Flew’s Compatibilism and His Objections to Theistic Libertarianism 2015/25 115 Kaygı Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi Uludağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Philosophy Sayı 25 / Issue 25│Bahar 2015 / Fall 2015 ISSN: 1303-4251 Research Article Araştırma Makalesi Hakan GUNDOGDU* Doç.Dr. | Assoc.Prof.Dr. Gazi University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ankara-Turkey [email protected] On Flew’s Compatibilism and His Objections to Theistic Libertarianism Abstract Flew strongly defends a compatibilist thesis in the free will debate before going on to totally object to theistic libertarianism. His objections basically rely on his compatibilism embracing the notion of agent causation, which is not very common in compatibilist theses. Since he is a strong proponent of ordinary language philosophy, he also holds that linguistic analyses can certainly solve the free will problem as well as many other problems of philosophy. In doing so, he first uses the paradigm cases based on our common sense experience and then assumes the verity of principle of alternative possibilities. This study attempts to show, on the one hand, that there are some serious difficulties in both his justification of compatibilism and his objections to theistic libertarianism, and on the other hand, that he cannot easily defend both at the same time. Keywords Antony Flew, Compatibilism, Free-Will, Agent, Causation, Theistic Libertarianism, Paradigm Case Argument, Principle of Alternative Possibility. * This study was funded by the Scientific and Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK): 2219 / 1059B191400716. On Flew’s Compatibilism and His Objections to Theistic Libertarianism 116 2015/25 1.
  • A Brief Appraisal of Behavioral Economists' Plea for Light Paternalism

    A Brief Appraisal of Behavioral Economists' Plea for Light Paternalism

    Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, vol 32, nº 3 (128), pp 445-458, July-September/2012 Freedom of choice and bounded rationality: a brief appraisal of behavioral economists’ plea for light paternalism ROBERTA MURAMATSU PATRÍCIA FONSECA* Behavioral economics has addressed interesting positive and normative ques- tions underlying the standard rational choice theory. More recently, it suggests that, in a real world of boundedly rational agents, economists could help people to im- prove the quality of their choices without any harm to autonomy and freedom of choice. This paper aims to scrutinize available arguments for and against current proposals of light paternalistic interventions mainly in the domain of intertemporal choice. It argues that incorporating the notion of bounded rationality in economic analysis and empirical findings of cognitive biases and self-control problems cannot make an indisputable case for paternalism. Keywords: freedom; choice; bounded rationality; paternalism; behavioral eco- nomics. JEL Classification: B40; B41; D11; D91. So the immediate problem in Libertarian Paternalism is the fatuity of its declared motivation Very few libertarians have maintained what Thaler and Sunstein suggest they maintain, and indeed many of the leading theorists have worked with ideas in line with what Thaler and Sunstein have to say about man’s nature Thaler and Sunstein are forcing an open door Daniel Klein, Statist Quo Bias, Economic Journal Watch, 2004 * Professora doutora da Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie e do Insper, e-mail: rmuramatsu@uol. com.br; Pesquisadora independente na área de Economia Comportamental e Psicologia Econômica, e-mail [email protected]. Submetido: 23/fevereiro/2011. Aprovado: 12/março/2011. Revista de Economia Política 32 (3), 2012 445 IntrodUCTION There is a long-standing methodological tradition stating that economics is a positive science that remains silent about policy issues and the complex determi- nants of human ends, values and motives.
  • Happiness and Economic Freedom: Are They Related?

    Happiness and Economic Freedom: Are They Related?

    SHS Web of Conferences 28, 01109 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162801109 RPTSS 2015 Happiness and economic freedom: Are they related? Ilkay Yilmaz1,a, and Mehmet Nasih Tag2 1Mersin University, Department of Economics, Mersin University, 33342 Mersin, Turkey 2Mersin University, Department of Business Administration, Mersin University, 33342 Mersin, Turkey Abstract. In this article we investigate the linkage between economic freedom and happiness (subjective well-being). We attempt to understand which economic institutions (rule of law, limited government, regulatory efficiency, open markets) have influence on subjective well-being. For this purpose we use a panel dataset and analyze the effect of economic freedom on subjective well-being while using various control variables such as government expenditures as percentage of GDP, human development, social support, freedom of choice and generosity. Our pooled FGLS estimations indicate that all pillars of economic freedom have a strong influence on the average subjective well-being in society. Three of these pillars, namely rule of law, regulatory efficiency and open markets, positively affect subjective well-being. To our surprise we have found a negative relationship between limited government and subjective well- being. This might be due to the situation that reducing the size of government possibly leads to lower government expenditures and higher unemployment, which in turn results in lower subjective well-being. 1 Introduction if any, increase the level of subjective well-being in a country. The literature on the relationship between As the great Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises economic institutions and economic growth suggests that explained in his magnum opus, human action can be good governmental institutions foster economic growth defined as the striving for happiness.
  • United Nations Convention Against Corruption

    United Nations Convention Against Corruption

    04-56160_c1-4.qxd 17/08/2004 12:33 Page 1 Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, A 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: +(43) (1) 26060-0, Fax: +(43) (1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION Printed in Austria V.04-56160—August 2004—copies UNITED NATIONS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION UNITED NATIONS New York, 2004 Foreword Corruption is an insidious plague that has a wide range of corrosive effects on societies. It undermines democracy and the rule of law, leads to violations of human rights, distorts markets, erodes the quality of life and allows organized crime, terrorism and other threats to human security to flourish. This evil phenomenon is found in all countries—big and small, rich and poor—but it is in the developing world that its effects are most destructive. Corruption hurts the poor disproportionately by diverting funds intended for development, undermining a Government’s ability to provide basic services, feeding inequality and injustice and discouraging foreign aid and investment. Corruption is a key element in economic underperformance and a major obsta- cle to poverty alleviation and development. I am therefore very happy that we now have a new instrument to address this scourge at the global level. The adoption of the United Nations Convention against Corruption will send a clear message that the international community is determined to prevent and control corruption. It will warn the corrupt that betrayal of the public trust will no longer be tolerated. And it will reaffirm the importance of core values such as honesty, respect for the rule of law, account- ability and transparency in promoting development and making the world a better place for all.
  • The Freedom of Academic Freedom: a Legal Dilemma

    The Freedom of Academic Freedom: a Legal Dilemma

    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 48 Issue 2 Article 4 October 1971 The Freedom of Academic Freedom: A Legal Dilemma Luis Kutner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Luis Kutner, The Freedom of Academic Freedom: A Legal Dilemma, 48 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 168 (1971). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol48/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE FREEDOM OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM: A LEGAL DILEMMA Luis KUTNER* Because modern man in his search for truth has turned away from kings, priests, commissars and bureaucrats, he is left, for better or worse, with professors. -Walter Lippman. Complete liberty of contradicting and disproving our opinion is the very condition which justifies us in assuming its truth for purposes of action.... -John Stuart Mill, On Liberty. I. INTRODUCTION IN THESE DAYS of crisis in higher education, part of the threat to aca- demic freedom-which includes the concepts of freedom of thought, inquiry, expression and orderly assembly-has come, unfortunately, from certain actions by professors, who have traditionally enjoyed the protection that academic freedom affords. While many of the professors who teach at American institutions of higher learning are indeed competent and dedicated scholars in their fields, a number of their colleagues have allied themselves with student demonstrators and like organized groups who seek to destroy the free and open atmosphere of the academic community.
  • Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion

    Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion

    Freedom of thought, COUNCIL CONSEIL conscience OF EUROPE DE L’EUROPE and religion A guide to the implementation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights Jim Murdoch Human rights handbooks, No. 9 HRHB9_EN.book Page 1 Tuesday, June 26, 2007 4:08 PM HRHB9_EN.book Page 1 Tuesday, June 26, 2007 4:08 PM Freedom of thought, conscience and religion A guide to the implementation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights Jim Murdoch Human rights handbooks, No. 9 HRHB9_EN.book Page 2 Tuesday, June 26, 2007 4:08 PM In the “Human rights handbooks” series: No. 1: The right to respect for private No. 6: The prohibition of torture. A Directorate General and family life. A guide to the implemen- guide to the implementation of Article 3 of Human Rights tation of Article 8 of the European Con- of the European Convention on Human and Legal Affairs vention on Human Rights (2001) Rights (2003) Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex No. 2: Freedom of expression. A guide to the implementation of Article 10 of the No. 7 : Positive obligations under the © Council of Europe, 2007 European Convention on Human Rights European Convention on Human Cover illustration © Sean Nel – Fotolia.com (2001) Rights. A guide to the implementation of No. 3: The right to a fair trial. A guide to the European Convention on Human 1st printing, June 2007 the implementation of Article 6 of the Rights (2007) Printed in Belgium European Convention on Human Rights (2001; 2nd edition, 2006) No. 8: The right to life.