DOCSLIB.ORG

Non-Flat Earth Recalibrated for Terrain and Topsoil Robert Blakemore

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Non-Flat Earth Recalibrated for Terrain and Topsoil Robert Blakemore Non-Flat Earth Recalibrated for Terrain and Topsoil Robert Blakemore To cite this version: Robert Blakemore. Non-Flat Earth Recalibrated for Terrain and Topsoil: + Addendum to ”Soil Syst. 2018, 2, 64” on SOC & NPP. Soil Systems, MDPI, 2018, 2 (4), pp.64. 10.3390/soilsystems2040064. hal-02859836 HAL Id: hal-02859836 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02859836 Submitted on 10 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Article Non-Flat Earth Recalibrated for Terrain and Topsoil Robert J. Blakemore 1,2 1 VermEcology, 101 Suidomichi, Nogeyama, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken 231-0064, Japan; [email protected] 2 Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, Odawara nr. Hakone, Kanagawa-ken 247-0007, Japan Received: 24 September 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 26 November 2018 Abstract: Earth’s land surface is raised from conventionally flat 15 Gha to >64 Gha accounting for hilly slope undulation and topsoil relief detail. Three main aspects are: topography, rugosity/tortuosity, and micro-relief/porosity of ice/vegetation-free ground. Recalibration arises from four approaches: First, direct empirical estimates of compiled satellite/LiDAR data means of +2.5–26% surface progressively overlain by +94% at cm2 scale for soil ruggedness then +108% for mm2 micro-relief; Second, from digital elevation models with thrice 1.6–2.0 times flat areas; Third, by ‘reverse engineering’ global soil bulk densities and carbon reserves requiring ×4–6 land. Finally, a Fermi estimation doubles the Earth’s surface—as exposed to Sun, air and rain—conveniently set at 100 Gha (with 64 Gha land:36 Gha ocean). Soil organic carbon (SOC) thereby grows to 8580 Gt mainly in SOM-humus with its biotic complexity plus roots, Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza (VAM-fungi), leaf-litter and earthworms itself totaling 17,810 Gt. Although four to six times IPCC’s or NASA/NOAA’s calculated 1500–2300 Gt SOC, this is likely an underestimation. Global biomass and biodiversity are at least doubled (×2–3.5) and net primary productivity (NPP) increases to >270 Gt C yr−1 due to terrain. Rationale for a ‘Soil Ecology Institute’ gains ground. Keywords: topographical land surface-area; soil carbon sequestration; global climate; earthworms 1. Introduction This paper attempts to answer the simple question: “What’s the Earth’s true surface area?”. Surprisingly, this has no exact answer yet is key for determining the extent of the living world and it is crucial for understanding our planet’s essential life-support systems, especially the neglected soil. Even the most basic information on soils—upon which we live and depend for >99% human food [1–3], 100% timber and natural fibres, to filter all our drinking water, for medicines, such as Penicillins, Streptomycins, Malacidins and now Teixobactin or drugs, like Ivermectin (anti-parasitic) and Bleomycin (anti-cancer), and which support >98% of biota [4–6] (and herein) whilst also buffering pollution and climate change—is poorly known. For example: How much topsoil is there? What is its rate of production and loss? How about total soil biodiversity, primary productivity, and the principal vulnerabilities or extinction threats? Part of the reason for knowledge deficit is the lack of a single ‘Soil Ecology Institute’ comparable to myriad Marine, Aquatic, Atmospheric and Astronomical advocacy or research facilities around the globe (plus innumerable agriculture, chemistry, microbiology, or physics laboratories, albeit some claim a soil remit). A major oversight is ignoring terrain and topsoil, the main issue the current work confronts, as this graphic summarizes (Figure1). Soil Syst. 2018, 2, 64; doi:10.3390/soilsystems2040064 www.mdpi.com/journal/soilsystems Soil Syst. 2018, 2, 64 2 of 39 Soil Syst. 2018, 2, x AUTHOR’S FINAL PROOF 2 of 39 FigureFigure 1.1.( a()a Hiroshige) Hiroshige Utagawa’s Utagawa’s 1833 1833 ukiyo-e ukiyo print:-e print “Bandits’: “Bandits’ Paradise: Paradise: Hakone Hakone on the Tokaido on the” (lookingTokaido” towards(looking Mt towards Fuji), itMt intuitively Fuji), it intuitively and stylistically and stylistically demonstrates demonstrates undulations undulations with a patchwork with a patchwork mosaic of landformsmosaic of andlandforms also shows and also how shows people how closely people follow closely each fol other,low rarely each other, looking rarely out beyondlooking the out pack beyond for tribalthe pack reasons for tribal of safety; reasons (b) NASA/NOAA’sof safety; (b) NASA/NOAA’s alternate ‘flat-Earth’ alternate view ‘flat- ofEarth this’ landscape;view of this remarkably, landscape; mostremarkably, current most totals current of biodiversity, totals of productivity,biodiversity, productivity, plus carbon and plus other carbon nutrient and other budgets nutrient based budgets upon theirbased flat upon linear-model their flat linear are consequently-model are consequently incorrect, widely incorrect, underestimating widely underestimat true values.ing true values. 1.1.1.1. Land’sLand’s SurfaceSurface AreaArea TheThe presentpresent studystudy buildsbuilds onon thethe author’sauthor’s earlierearlier workwork [[2,72,7––99]] andand sourcessources thatthat areare citedcited therein.therein. BeforeBefore focusingfocusing onon topsoils/earthworms,topsoils/earthworms, it is necessary to firstfirst considerconsider aa broaderbroader picturepicture andand thethe implicationsimplications ofof increasingincreasing landland relief.relief. ByBy long-standinglong-standing convention,convention, land areaarea isis measuredmeasured onon aa commoncommon surfacesurface planeplane projectedprojected ontoonto thethe ground,ground, i.e.,i.e., asas aa twotwo dimensionaldimensional (2-D),(2-D), flat,flat,planimetric planimetric area.area. NASA/NOAANASA/NOAA estimates are of 14.8–15.114.8–15.1 Gha landland (29.2%)(29.2%) andand 36.236.2 GhaGha oceanocean (70.8%)(70.8%) givinggiving aroundaround 51 51 Gha Gha for for Earth’s Earth’s (flat) (flat) surface surface [10]. However, [10]. However, these totals these do nottotals consider do not terrain, consider topography, terrain, nortopograph ruggedy surface, nor rugged topsoil surface relief. Intopsoil other relief. words, In theyother ignore words, that they the ignore ground that is naturallythe ground hilly is naturally and soil bumpy.hilly and Reasoning soil bumpy from. R theseeasoning Space, from Oceanic, these andSpace, Atmosphere Oceanic, agenciesand Atmosphere (everything agencies but Soil?) (everything is along thebut lines Soil?) of is the along Globe the being lines of so the large Globe that being slight so elevations, large that such slight as elevations the Alps, Andes,, such as Antarctic the Alps, Ranges, Andes, AtlasAntarctic Mounts, Ranges, Australia’s Atlas Mounts Great Dividing, Australia’s Range, Great Ethiopian Dividing Highlands, Range, Ethiopian Himalayas, Highlands, Japanese Himalayas Alps and, theJapanese North Alps American and the Cordillera North American are insignificant. Cordillera This are may insignificant. be essentially This true may at scalesbe essentially of observation true at aroundscales of 10,000 observation km to 10,000 around m 10,000 (at which km Yingto 10,000 et al. m 2014 (at which also found Ying topography et al. 2014 also negligible, found topography as is noted later).negligible Under-appreciated, as is noted later is that). whileUnder the-appreciated sea is horizontally is that flat,while land the invariably sea is horizontally undulates, and,flat, sinceland itinvariably indeed occupies undulates only, and 29%, since of the it projected indeed occupies surface, thenonly the29% more of the planar projected versus surface hilly parts, then of the just more this proportionplanar versus are hilly inter-comparable. parts of just this The proportion following are table inter summarizes-comparable. the The current following false ‘flat-Earth’table summarizes status (Tablethe current1). false ‘flat-Earth’ status (Table 1). Table 1. Earth’s Inadequate Status Quo Flat-Earth Surface Model. Table 1. Earth’s Inadequate Status Quo Flat-Earth Surface Model. Flat AreasFlat Areas CIA CIA 2008 (Gha)(Gha) FAO FAO(Gha) (Gha) * *% % Six ContinentsSix Continents 13.36 13.01 13.01 87 87 AntarcticaAntarctica 1.40 1.40 (2% ice-free)ice-free) 1.4 1.49.4 9.4 Greenland 0.22 (21% ice-free) 0.18 1.2 Rivers/lakesGreenland 0.22 (21% - ice-free) 0.18 0.15–0.37 1.2 1.1–2.5 Rivers/lakes - 0.15–0.37 1.1–2.5 TOTAL 14.98 ~14.96 100 TOTAL 14.98 ~14.96 100 * From Nunn & Puga (2009: appendix) [11] of ~15 Gha planimetric land including hot or cold deserts with roughly* From 80%Nunn (12 & Gha) Puga supporting (2009: appendix) terrestrial soils[11] providingof ~15 Gha various planimetric levels of land organic includ carbon,ing hot natural or cold fertility deserts and specieswith roughly richness; 80% some ( bodies12 Gha of) watersupporting (e.g., temporary terrestrial freshwater soils provid inundations,ing various rice paddy, levels springs, of organic bogs, marshes,carbon, or swamps)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Infiltration from the Pedon to Global Grid Scales: an Overview and Outlook for Land Surface Modeling
    Published June 24, 2019 Reviews and Analyses Core Ideas Infiltration from the Pedon to Global • Land surface models (LSMs) show Grid Scales: An Overview and Outlook a large variety in describing and upscaling infiltration. for Land Surface Modeling • Soil structural effects on infiltration in LSMs are mostly neglected. Harry Vereecken, Lutz Weihermüller, Shmuel Assouline, • New soil databases may help to Jirka Šimůnek, Anne Verhoef, Michael Herbst, Nicole Archer, parameterize infiltration processes Binayak Mohanty, Carsten Montzka, Jan Vanderborght, in LSMs. Gianpaolo Balsamo, Michel Bechtold, Aaron Boone, Sarah Chadburn, Matthias Cuntz, Bertrand Decharme, Received 22 Oct. 2018. Agnès Ducharne, Michael Ek, Sebastien Garrigues, Accepted 16 Feb. 2019. Klaus Goergen, Joachim Ingwersen, Stefan Kollet, David M. Lawrence, Qian Li, Dani Or, Sean Swenson, Citation: Vereecken, H., L. Weihermüller, S. Philipp de Vrese, Robert Walko, Yihua Wu, Assouline, J. Šimůnek, A. Verhoef, M. Herbst, N. Archer, B. Mohanty, C. Montzka, J. Vander- and Yongkang Xue borght, G. Balsamo, M. Bechtold, A. Boone, S. Chadburn, M. Cuntz, B. Decharme, A. Infiltration in soils is a key process that partitions precipitation at the land sur- Ducharne, M. Ek, S. Garrigues, K. Goergen, J. face into surface runoff and water that enters the soil profile. We reviewed the Ingwersen, S. Kollet, D.M. Lawrence, Q. Li, D. basic principles of water infiltration in soils and we analyzed approaches com- Or, S. Swenson, P. de Vrese, R. Walko, Y. Wu, and Y. Xue. 2019. Infiltration from the pedon monly used in land surface models (LSMs) to quantify infiltration as well as its to global grid scales: An overview and out- numerical implementation and sensitivity to model parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI GMS-5, Geology of the Powers Quadrangle, Oregon
    o thickness of about 1,500 feet. The southern outcrop terminates against the Sixes River fault, indicat­ Intermediate intrusive rocks, mainly diorite and quartz diorite, intrude the Gal ice Formation ing that the last movement involved down-faulting along the north side. south of the Sixes River fault. One stock, covering nearly 2 square miles, is bisected by Benson Creek, Megafossils are present in some of the bedded basal sandstone. Forominifera examined by W. W. and numerous small dikes are present nearby. One of the largest dikes extends from Rusty Creek eastward Rau (Baldwin, 1965) collected a short distance west of the mouth of Big Creek along the Sixes River were through the Middle Fork of the Sixes River into Salman Mountain. These intrusive racks are described by assigned a middle Eocene age . A middle Eocene microfauna in beds of similar age near Powers was ex­ Lund and Baldwin ( 1969) and are correlated with the Pearse Peak diorite of Koch ( 1966). The Pearse amined by Thoms (Born, 1963), and another outcrop along Fourmile Creek to the north contained a mid­ Peak body, which intrudes the Ga lice Formation along Elk River to the south, is described by Koch (1966, GEOLOGICAL MAP SERIES dle Eocene molluscan fauna (Allen and Baldwin, 1944). Phillips (1968) also collected o middle Eocene p. 51-52) . fauna in middle Umpqua strata along Fourmile Creek, o short distance north of the mapped area. Lode gold deposits reported by Brooks and Ramp ( 1968) in the South Fork of the Sixes drainage and on Rusty Butte are apparently associated with the dioritic intrusive bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Hydraulic Erosion Simulation and Visualization on GPU
    Fast Hydraulic Erosion Simulation and Visualization on GPU Xing Mei Philippe Decaudin Bao-Gang Hu CASIA-LIAMA/NLPR, Beijing, China INRIA-Evasion, Grenoble, France CASIA-LIAMA/NLPR, Beijing, China xmei@(NOSPAM)nlpr.ia.ac.cn & CASIA-LIAMA, Beijing, China hubg@(NOSPAM)nlpr.ia.ac.cn philippe.decaudin@(NOSPAM)imag.fr Figure 1. Illustration of our erosion simulation on a ”PG”-shaped mountain. (a) The initial terrain. (b) Terrain is being eroded by rainfall. The dissolved soil (denoted by green color) is transported by the water flow (blue). (c) The eroded terrain and the deposited sediment (red) after the rainfall and during the evaporation. Abstract 1. Introduction Natural mountains and valleys are gradually eroded by Natural terrains exhibit a lot of complex shapes such rainfall and river flows. Physically-based modeling of this as valleys, ridges, sand ripples and crests. These geomor- complex phenomenon is a major concern in producing re- phological structures are mostly determined by the erosion alistic synthesized terrains. However, despite some recent phenomenon: soil is dissolved and transported by the wa- improvements, existing algorithms are still computationally ter flow, sand is carried away by the wind, and stones are expensive, leading to a time-consuming process fairly im- decomposed into small blocks by the temperature. Erosion practical for terrain designers and 3D artists. simulation has always been an important research topic in landscape design [5, 8], since it greatly enhances the realism In this paper, we present a new method to model the hy- of the synthesized terrains. draulic erosion phenomenon which runs at interactive rates We focus on hydraulic erosion, which is the predominant on today’s computers.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Session: Measuring Fractals Diversity in Mathematics, 2019
    Joint Session: Measuring Fractals Diversity in Mathematics, 2019 Tongou Yang The University of British Columbia, Vancouver [email protected] July 2019 Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 1 / 12 Let's Talk Geography Which country has the longest coastline? What is the longest river on earth? Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 2 / 12 (a) Map of Canada (b) Map of Nunavut Which country has the longest coastline? List of countries by length of coastline Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 3 / 12 (b) Map of Nunavut Which country has the longest coastline? List of countries by length of coastline (a) Map of Canada Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 3 / 12 Which country has the longest coastline? List of countries by length of coastline (a) Map of Canada (b) Map of Nunavut Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 3 / 12 What's the Longest River on Earth? A Youtube Video Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 4 / 12 Measuring a Smooth Curve Example: use a rope Figure: Boundary between CA and US on the Great Lakes Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 5 / 12 Measuring a Rugged Coastline Figure: Coast of Nova Scotia Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 6 / 12 Covering by Grids 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 7 / 12 Counting Grids Number of Grids=15 Side Length ≈ 125km Coastline ≈ 15 × 125 = 1845km. Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 8 / 12 Covering by Finer Grids 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Tongou Yang (UBC) Fractal Lectures July 2019 9 / 12 Counting Grids Number of Grids=34 Side Length ≈ 62km Coastline ≈ 34 × 62 = 2108km.
    [Show full text]
  • State Standard for Hydrologic Modeling Guidelines
    ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES FLOOD MITIGATION SECTION State Standard For Hydrologic Modeling Guidelines Under the authority outlined in ARS 48-3605(A) the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources establishes the following standard for Hydrologic Modeling Guidelines in Arizona. State Standard for Hydrologic Modeling, or “guidelines for the experienced modeler”, has been developed to address hydrologic conditions for a variety of statewide watersheds. Included are problems and situations identified by the State Standard Work Group (SSWG) and floodplain managers. The intended audience is statewide; engineers, professionals and Floodplain Administrators. The following topics are included: • Hydrologic Model comparison and recommendation • Guidelines and parameters • Model application for specific situations, and associated hydrologic parameters • Precipitation values (NOAA 14) • Storm duration • Unique conditions, such as wildfire burn, overgrazing, logging, drought, rapid snowmelt, urbanization. The State Standard includes examples addressing the above key issues. This requirement is effective August, 2007. Copies of this State Standard and the State Standard Technical Supplement can be obtained by contacting the Department’s Water Engineering Section at (602) 771-8652. SS10-07 1 August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose and Background .......................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Drainage Basins As Fundamental Units for Mine Closure Planning: Aurora and Pastor I Quarries
    Natural Drainage Basins as Fundamental Units for Mine Closure Planning: Aurora and Pastor I Quarries Cristina Martín-Moreno1, María Tejedor1, José Martín1, José Nicolau2, Ernest Bladé3, Sara Nyssen1, Miguel Lalaguna2, Alejandro de Lis1, Ivón Cermeño-Martín1 and José Gómez4 1. Faculty of Geological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain 2. Polytechnic School, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain 3. Institut FLUMEN, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain 4. Fábrica de Alcanar, Cemex España ABSTRACT The vast majority of the Earth’s ice-free land surface has been shaped by fluvial and related slope geomorphic processes. Drainage basins are consequently the most common land surface organization units. Mining operations disrupt this efficient surface structure. Therefore, mine restoration lacking stable drainage basins and networks, “blended into and complementing the drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain” (in the sense of SMCRA 1977), will be always limited. The pre-mine drainage characteristics cannot be replicated, because mining creates irreversible changes in earth physical properties and volumes. However, functional drainage basins and networks, adapted to the new earth material properties, can and should be restored. Dominant current mine restoration practice, typically, either lacks a drainage network or has a deficient, non-natural, drainage design. Extensive literature provides evidence that this is a common reason for mined land reclamation failure. These conventional drainage engineered solutions are not reliable in the long term without guaranteed constant maintenance. Additionally, conventional landform design has low ecological and visual integration with the adjoining landscapes, and is becoming rejected by public and regulators, worldwide. For these reasons, fluvial geomorphic restoration, with a drainage basin approach, is receiving enormous attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Erosion of Soil and Terrain Atira Odhner, Joseph Fleming 2009 Abstract
    Hydraulic Erosion of Soil and Terrain Atira Odhner, Joseph Fleming 2009 Abstract We have developed an algorithm for hard and soft water-based terrain erosion. Additionally, we have added a rain generation into the simulator. The algorithm is based upon fluid simulation, but is simplified, while still preserving the fluid motion effects. Introduction Our goal is to design an algorithm that generates water-eroded terrain quickly for the purposes of artistic productions, rather than scientific study. We wish to simulate the effects of rivers and streams, taking into account erosion, transportation, and sedimentation. Other algorithms take into account full fluid simulation, but we wished to obtain similar results by using a less-costly yet water- based erosion algorithm. Previous Work There are many examples of previous work on the subject of erosion, as it is important for both the graphics community and the environmental conservation community. We have chosen a few that are both relevant to the our algorithm, and demonstrate natural and atmospheric effects related to our algorithm. Since there are so many similar works (often repeating themselves), these studies are introduced by relevance, rather than by year. In 2005, Beneš and Arriaga [1] proposed a method for generating table mountains. Table mountains are desert geological structures that are very narrow, yet water-based erosion; plateaus with almost vertical cliff walls. These mountains form through mostly thermal erosion rather than by; rock that is exposed deteriorates. For this reason, table mountains are found in desert environments. The algorithm in this paper is not water-based, but it relates to the erosion of river banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Rainfall Impulses Through Progressively Larger Drainage Basins in Steep Forested Terrain
    Tracking rainfall impulses through progressively larger drainage basins in steep forested terrain ROBERT R. ZIEMER & RAYMOND M. RICE USDA Forest Service,Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Arcata, California 95521, USA ABSTRACT The precision of timing devices in modern electronic data loggers makes it possible to study the routing of water through small drainage basins having rapid responses to hydrologic impulses. Storm hyetographs were measured using digital. tipping bucket raingauges and their routing was observed at headwater piezometers located mid-slope, above a swale, and near the swale. Downslope, flow was recorded from naturally occurring soil pipes draining the 0.8-ha swale, Progressing downstream from the swale, streamflow was measured at stations gauging nested basins of 16, 156, 217, and 383 ha. Peak lag time significantly (p = 0.035) increased downstream. Peak unitareadischarge decreased downstream, but the relationship was not statistically significant (p = 0.456). The processes involved in the delivery of rainfall from hillsides, to swales, and through progessively larger stream channels in steep forested watersheds are not fully understood. Most hydrologic concepts concerning the routing of flood hydrographs have developed from observations on large rivers. It is usually assumed that downstream hydrographs are lagged in time and flattened to produce later peaks and smaller unit area peak discharges (Chow, 1964). There are few reports of hydrograph routing in small, steep upland watersheds. Researchers working in steep forested watersheds generally agree that classic Hortonian overland flow (Horton, 1933) rarely occurs because the infiltration rate of forest soils usually exceeds precipitation rates. Despite several studies conducted in the past 20 years,the pathways of muting rainfall into and through hillslope soils in forested basins remain poorly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 6 Math Circles Fractals Introduction
    Faculty of Mathematics Centre for Education in Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Mathematics and Computing Grade 6 Math Circles March 10/11 2020 Fractals Introduction Fractals are mathematical objects that are self-similar, meaning that they have the same structure when you zoom in on them. For example, this is a famous fractal called the Mandelbrot set: Image by Arnaud Cheritat, retrieved from: https://www.math.univ-toulouse.fr/~cheritat/wiki-draw/index.php/File:MilMand_1000iter.png 1 The main shape, which looks a bit like a snowman, is shaded in the image below: As an exercise, shade in some of the smaller snowmen that are all around the largest one in the image above. This is an example of self-similarity, and this pattern continues into infinity. Watch what happens when you zoom deeper and deeper into the Mandelbrot Set here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCpLWbHVNhk. Drawing Fractals Fractals like the Mandelbrot Set are generated using formulas and computers, but there are a number of simple fractals that we can draw ourselves. 2 Sierpinski Triangle Image by Beojan Stanislaus, retrieved from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sierpinski_triangle.svg Use the template and the steps below to draw this fractal: 1. Start with an equilateral triangle. 2. Connect the midpoints of all three sides. This will create one upside down triangle and three right-side up triangles. 3. Repeat from step 1 for each of the three right-side up triangles. 3 Apollonian Gasket Retrieved from: https://mathlesstraveled.com/2016/04/20/post-without-words-6/ Use the template and the steps below to draw this fractal: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method of Watershed Delineation for Flat Terrain Using Sentinel-2A Imagery and DEM: a Case Study of the Taihu Basin
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article A Method of Watershed Delineation for Flat Terrain Using Sentinel-2A Imagery and DEM: A Case Study of the Taihu Basin Leilei Li 1,2,*, Jintao Yang 2,3 and Jin Wu 2,3 1 State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China; [email protected] (J.Y.); [email protected] (J.W.) 3 State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100101, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-18911719037 Received: 4 September 2019; Accepted: 24 November 2019; Published: 26 November 2019 Abstract: Accurate watershed delineation is a precondition for runoff and water quality simulation. Traditional digital elevation model (DEM) may not generate realistic drainage networks due to large depressions and subtle elevation differences in local-scale plains. In this study, we propose a new method for solving the problem of watershed delineation, using the Taihu Basin as a case study. Rivers, lakes, and reservoirs were obtained from Sentinel-2A images with the Canny algorithm on Google Earth Engine (GEE), rather than from DEM, to compose the drainage network. Catchments were delineated by modifying the flow direction of rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and overland flow, instead of using DEM values. A watershed was divided into the following three types: Lake, reservoir, and overland catchment. A total of 2291 river segments, seven lakes, eight reservoirs, and 2306 subwatersheds were retained in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Terrain, Territory Stuart Elden Prog Hum Geogr 2010 34: 799 Originally Published Online 21 April 2010 DOI: 10.1177/0309132510362603
    Progress in Human Geography http://phg.sagepub.com/ Land, terrain, territory Stuart Elden Prog Hum Geogr 2010 34: 799 originally published online 21 April 2010 DOI: 10.1177/0309132510362603 The online version of this article can be found at: http://phg.sagepub.com/content/34/6/799 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Progress in Human Geography can be found at: Email Alerts: http://phg.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://phg.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://phg.sagepub.com/content/34/6/799.refs.html Downloaded from phg.sagepub.com at SWETS WISE ONLINE CONTENT on December 13, 2010 Article Progress in Human Geography 34(6) 799–817 ª The Author(s) 2010 Land, terrain, territory Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav 10.1177/0309132510362603 phg.sagepub.com Stuart Elden Durham University, UK Abstract This paper outlines a way toward conceptual and historical clarity around the question of territory. The aim is not to define territory, in the sense of a single meaning; but rather to indicate the issues at stake in grasping how it has been understood in different historical and geographical contexts. It does so first by critically interrogating work on territoriality, suggesting that neither the biological nor the social uses of this term are particularly profitable ways to approach the historically more specific category of ‘territory’. Instead, ideas of ‘land’ and ‘terrain’ are examined, suggesting that these political-economic and political-strategic rela- tions are essential to understanding ‘territory’, yet ultimately insufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 GMC Terrain Catalog
    LIVE 2020 LIKE A PRO GMC TERRAIN 20GMCTERRC-25 LIVE LIKE A PRO As a pro, the status quo is not an acceptable status. Pushing forward and improving on what came before is the only path to real rewards. That’s why we’ve built an SUV that’s game for whatever the day demands. With its bold stance and masculine design, two turbocharged engine options and size-defying capabilities, Terrain is the compact SUV that plays big. Experience the SUV for you—the 2020 GMC Terrain. SOME MISSION STATEMENTS ARE CARVED IN STONE; WE USE SHEET METAL, ALUMINUM AND PASSION I MULTIDIMENSIONAL GRILLE I LED HEADLAMPS WITH GMC SIGNATURE C-SHAPE DESIGN I 19" BRIGHT MACHINED ALUMINUM WHEELS WITH PREMIUM GRAY PAINTED ACCENTS I NEWLY UPGRADED PREMIUM SUSPENSION SETTLE IN, BUT NEVER SETTLE TERRAIN OFFERS AN ARRAY OF PREMIUM MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT: I LEATHER-WRAPPED STEERING WHEEL I AUTHENTIC ALUMINUM TRIM I SOFT-TOUCH INSTRUMENT PANEL I VENTILATED FRONT SEATS ARE AVAILABLE (DENALI ONLY) I HEATED SECOND-ROW OUTBOARD SEATS ARE AVAILABLE (DENALI ONLY) Terrain’s cabin welcomes you with a leather-wrapped steering wheel, authentic aluminum trim and a soft-touch instrument panel to create a premium environment no matter which trim level you choose. To further enhance your experience, heated and ventilated front seats are available. DOESN’T NEED CHROME TO SHINE I 19" GLOSS-BLACK PAINTED ALUMINUM WHEELS I DARKENED GRILLE I BLACK MIRROR CAPS AND ROOF RAILS I BLACK EXTERIOR ACCENTS AND TRIM BADGING The Terrain Elevation Edition goes all in with a bold presence—telling the world that something unique is headed its way.
    [Show full text]