The Pennsylvania State University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Pennsylvania State University The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Molecular Toxicology FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GAG TRINUCLEOTIDE-REPEAT POLYMORPHISM IN THE CATALYTIC SUBUNIT OF THE GLUTATHIONE BIOSYNTHETIC ENZYME, -GLUTAMYLCYSTEINE LIGASE A Dissertation in Integrative Biosciences by Sailendra N Nichenametla 2010 Sailendra N Nichenametla Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2010 The dissertation of Sailendra Nichenametla was reviewed and approved* by the following: John P Richie Jr. Professor of Pharmacology & Health Evaluation Sciences Dissertation Advisor and Chair of Committee Philip Lazarus Professor of Pharmacology & Health Evaluation Sciences Joshua Muscat Professor of Public Health Sciences Curtis J Omiecinski Professor of Veterinary Science Scot Kimball Professor of Cellular and Molecular Physiology Peter Hudson Professor of Biology Head of the Department of Integrative Biosciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii Abstract Glutathione (GSH), the most abundant intracellular antioxidant, is proposed to prevent cancer through multiple biochemical pathways including carcinogen detoxification, scavenging and neutralizing free radicals, modulating gene expression and cell signaling. Low glutathione levels have been associated with higher risk for diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, arthritis and diabetes. -glutamylcysteine ligase (GCL), the rate limiting enzyme for glutathione biosynthesis is made up of a catalytic subunit (GCLC) and a modifier subunit (GCLM). A guanine-adenine-guanine (GAG) trinucleotide repeat polymorphism in the 5’ UTR of GCLC, the gene that codes for catalytic subunit, has been identified with five different alleles consisting of 4, 7, 8, 9 or 10 GAG repeats. The GAG polymorphism is associated with glutathione levels in certain cell lines and also with risk for diseases such as chronic beryllium diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and schizophrenia. In the present work, in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to investigate if and how genetic variation (the GAG repeat polymorphism) in the GCL, the rate limiting enzyme for glutathione biosynthesis, affects glutathione levels in healthy adults and whether its effect on glutathione levels alters risk for cancer. In the first study presented here, it was hypothesized that the GAG repeat polymorphism in GCLC is associated with altered GCL activity and blood GSH levels in vivo. Healthy adult individuals were genotyped for the GAG iv polymorphism in the GCLC gene and related phenotypes, blood GCLC protein levels, blood GCL activity and GSH levels were also determined. Among the three most prevalent genotypes i.e., GAG-7/7, GAG-7/9 and GAG-9/9, individuals with genotype GAG-9/9 had lower GSH levels compared to those with genotype GAG-7/9, lower GCL activity compared to those with genotype GAG-7/7 and lower GCLC protein levels compared to those with either genotypes GAG-7/7 and GAG-7/9. These findings suggest that the GAG repeat polymorphism contributes to lower blood GSH levels in GAG-9/9 individuals than GAG-7/7 individuals apparently due to a decrease in GCLC protein levels and hence GCL activity. The specific impact of GAG repeat number on GCLC expression was investigated by in vitro transcription and in vitro translation assays. Through luciferase reporter assays of cell cultures and transcription and translation assays of cell free lysates, it was found that the GAG polymorphism in the GCLC 5’-UTR affects the translation of the luciferase mRNA but not its transcription. With an increasing number of GAG repeats in the constructs, luciferase activity and protein levels reached maximal levels in GAG-8 or GAG-9 and then decreased with GAG-10. The finding that luciferase expression was greater in GAG-9 than in GAG-7 was in contrast to in vivo findings where higher blood GCLC protein levels and blood GCL activity were observed for genotype 7/7 compared to genotype 9/9. These observations are likely a result of differential regulation of glutathione levels in red blood cells, in which all of the phenotypes were measured in our in vivo study. v Based on the functional consequences of the GAG repeat polymorphism in GCLC, we hypothesized that the GAG polymorphism is associated with risk for certain cancers. To test this hypothesis, individuals with cancers whose etiology is thought to be linked with oxidative stress i.e., lung, oral, colorectal and breast cancers and matched controls were genotyped for GAG repeats in GCLC. Statistical analyses showed that individuals with GAG-7/7 were at approximately 2-fold higher risk compared to those with GAG-9/9 for lung cancer (p=0.05) and oral cancer (p=0.03) but not for colorectal and breast cancers. Stratified analysis of lung cancer patients indicated that current smokers with GAG-7/7 were at significantly higher risk (p=0.01) but not ex-smokers or never smokers. These results are consistent with in vitro studies linking the genotype GAG-7/7 is associated with lower glutathione levels and higher risk for cancer. In addition these results highlight the importance of the GSH biosynthetic pathway in determining the risk for tobacco related cancers such as lung and oral cancers. Overall, findings from these studies suggest that genetic variation in the GSH biosynthetic pathway alters risk for cancer by contributing to different levels of GSH among individuals. Since GSH is involved in numerous biochemical functions of the cell, this genetic variation might also play a role in other diseases whose etiology is linked to GSH or oxidative stress. Furthermore, the GAG genotype information along with other polymorphisms and risk factors can be used as a genetic biomarker to identify individuals predisposed to diseases and toxicities that involve GSH metabolism or oxidative stress. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................. ix LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................. xii Chapter 1 - Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 1. 1. OXIDATIVE STRESS AND CANCER ..................................................................... 2 1.1.A. Sources of Oxidative Stress ................................................................................. 2 1.1.B. Consequences of Oxidative Stress ...................................................................... 8 1.1.C. Role of Oxidative Stress in Cancer .................................................................... 11 1.1.D. Antioxidant Systems .......................................................................................... 12 1.2. GLUTATHIONE AND CANCER .............................................................................20 1.2.A. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 20 1.2.B. Protective Role of Glutathione in Cancer ........................................................... 22 1.2.C. GSH Metabolism ................................................................................................ 28 1.3. FACTORS REGULATING GLUTATHIONE LEVELS ..................................................30 1.3.A. Dietary Factors Affecting Glutathione Levels ..................................................... 30 1.3.B. Genetic Factors Affecting Glutathione Levels .................................................... 33 1.3.C. Miscellaneous Factors Affecting Glutathione Levels ......................................... 34 1.4. TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT POLYMORPHISMS .......................................................35 1.4.A. Occurrence and Distribution of Microsatellites ................................................... 35 1.4.B. Functional Significance ...................................................................................... 37 1.4.C. Microsatellites and Cancer ................................................................................. 42 1.5. HYPOTHESES ..................................................................................................45 vii Chapter 2 - Effect of GAG repeat polymorphism in GCLC on GCLC protein levels, GCL activity and GSH levels in vivo ................................................... 48 2.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................49 2.2 METHODS ........................................................................................................50 2.2.A. Recruitment of Study Subjects ........................................................................... 50 2.2.B. Biospecimen Collection ...................................................................................... 52 2.2.C. Determining GCLC Genotype, DNA Amplification ............................................. 52 2.2.D. Determining GCLC Genotype, Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ................. 54 2.2.E. Determination of Blood GSH .............................................................................. 54 2.2.F. Determination of GCL Activity ............................................................................ 56 2.2.G. Determination of GCLC Protein Levels ............................................................. 57 2.2.H. Statistical
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanistic Study of Cysteine Dioxygenase, a Non-Heme
    MECHANISTIC STUDY OF CYSTEINE DIOXYGENASE, A NON-HEME MONONUCLEAR IRON ENZYME by WEI LI Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON August 2014 Copyright © by Student Name Wei Li All Rights Reserved Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Pierce for your mentoring, guidance and patience over the five years. I cannot go all the way through this without your help. Your intelligence and determination has been and will always be an example for me. I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Dias, Dr. Heo and Dr. Jonhson- Winters for the directions and invaluable advice. I also would like to thank all my lab mates, Josh, Bishnu ,Andra, Priyanka, Eleanor, you all helped me so I could finish my projects. I would like to thank the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry for the help with my academic and career. At Last, I would like to thank my lovely wife and beautiful daughter who made my life meaningful and full of joy. July 11, 2014 iii Abstract MECHANISTIC STUDY OF CYSTEINE DIOXYGENASE A NON-HEME MONONUCLEAR IRON ENZYME Wei Li, PhD The University of Texas at Arlington, 2014 Supervising Professor: Brad Pierce Cysteine dioxygenase (CDO) is an non-heme mononuclear iron enzymes that catalyzes the O2-dependent oxidation of L-cysteine (Cys) to produce cysteine sulfinic acid (CSA). CDO controls cysteine levels in cells and is a potential drug target for some diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzhermer’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Cysteamine: an Old Drug with New Potential
    Drug Discovery Today Volume 18, Numbers 15/16 August 2013 REVIEWS POST SCREEN Cysteamine: an old drug with new potential Reviews 1,2 3 1,2,4 Martine Besouw , Rosalinde Masereeuw , Lambert van den Heuvel and 1,2 Elena Levtchenko 1 Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 2 Laboratory of Pediatrics, Department of Development & Regeneration, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium 3 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 4 Laboratory for Genetic, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Cysteamine is an amino thiol with the chemical formula HSCH2CH2NH2. Endogenously, cysteamine is derived from coenzyme A degradation, although its plasma concentrations are low. Most experience with cysteamine as a drug originates from the field of the orphan disease cystinosis, in which cysteamine is prescribed to decrease intralysosomal cystine accumulation. However, over the years, the drug has been used for several other applications both in vitro and in vivo. In this article, we review the different applications of cysteamine, ending with an overview of ongoing clinical trials for new indications, such as neurodegenerative disorders and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The recent development of an enteric-coated cysteamine formulation makes cysteamine more patient friendly and will extend its applicability for both old and new indications. Endogenous cysteamine production cysteine, it is oxidized into taurine by hypotaurine dehydrogenase Cysteamine (synonyms: b-mercaptoethylamine, 2-aminoetha- (Fig. 1b). Taurine is excreted either in urine, or in feces in the form nethiol, 2-mercaptoethylamine, decarboxycysteine, thioethano- of bile salts [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Handbook of Enzymes
    Dietmar Schomburg and Ida Schomburg (Eds.) Springer Handbook of Enzymes Volume 25 Class 1 • Oxidoreductases X EC 1.9-1.13 co edited by Antje Chang Second Edition 4y Springer Index of Recommended Enzyme Names EC-No. Recommended Name Page 1.13.11.50 acetylacetone-cleaving enzyme 673 1.10.3.4 o-aminophenol oxidase 149 1.13.12.12 apo-/?-carotenoid-14',13'-dioxygenase 732 1.13.11.34 arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase 591 1.13.11.40 arachidonate 8-lipoxygenase 627 1.13.11.31 arachidonate 12-lipoxygenase 568 1.13.11.33 arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase 585 1.13.12.1 arginine 2-monooxygenase 675 1.13.11.13 ascorbate 2,3-dioxygenase 491 1.10.2.1 L-ascorbate-cytochrome-b5 reductase 79 1.10.3.3 L-ascorbate oxidase 134 1.11.1.11 L-ascorbate peroxidase 257 1.13.99.2 benzoate 1,2-dioxygenase (transferred to EC 1.14.12.10) 740 1.13.11.39 biphenyl-2,3-diol 1,2-dioxygenase 618 1.13.11.22 caffeate 3,4-dioxygenase 531 1.13.11.16 3-carboxyethylcatechol 2,3-dioxygenase 505 1.13.11.21 p-carotene 15,15'-dioxygenase (transferred to EC 1.14.99.36) 530 1.11.1.6 catalase 194 1.13.11.1 catechol 1,2-dioxygenase 382 1.13.11.2 catechol 2,3-dioxygenase 395 1.10.3.1 catechol oxidase 105 1.13.11.36 chloridazon-catechol dioxygenase 607 1.11.1.10 chloride peroxidase 245 1.13.11.49 chlorite O2-lyase 670 1.13.99.4 4-chlorophenylacetate 3,4-dioxygenase (transferred to EC 1.14.12.9) .
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0222148A1 Turano Et Al
    US 20120222148A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0222148A1 Turano et al. (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 30, 2012 (54) METHODS FOR THE BIOSYNTHESIS OF AOIH 5/10 (2006.01) TAURINE OR HYPOTAURINE IN CELLS AOIH 5/08 (2006.01) A636/00 (2006.01) (75) Inventors: Frank J. Turano, Baltimore, MD CI2N 5/82 (2006.01) (US); Kathleen A. Turano, (52) U.S. Cl. ......... 800/260; 424/725; 426/615; 426/635; Baltimore, MD (US); Peters. 435/468; 435/411; 435/412: 435/415; 435/417: Carlson, Baltimore, MD (US); 435/419: 800/278; 800/290; 800/298; 800/301; Alan M. Kinnersley, Baltimore, 800/302:800/305; 800/307; 800/308; 800/309; MD (US) 800/310: 800/312:800/313; 800/314; 800/315; (73) Assignee: PLANT SENSORY SYSTEMS Sooo... LLC, Baltimore, MD (US) •800/320.1; - s 800/320.2:of 800/320.3s (21) Appl. No.: 131505,415 (57) ABSTRACT (22) PCT Filed: Oct. 29, 2010 The present invention describes an approach to increase tau rine or hypotaurine production in prokaryotes or eukaryotes. (86). PCT No.: PCT/US2O1 O/O54664 More particularly, the invention relates to genetic transforma tion of organisms with genes that encode proteins that cata S371 (c)(1), lyze the conversion of cysteine to taurine, methionine to tau (2), (4) Date: May 1, 2012 rine, cysteamine to taurine, or alanine to taurine. The invention describes methods for the use of polynucleotides Related U.S. Application Data that encode functional cysteine dioxygenase (CDO), cysteine (60) 2,Provisional 2009, provisional application application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Structure of Mammalian Cysteine Dioxygenase
    THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 281, NO. 27, pp. 18723–18733, July 7, 2006 © 2006 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Printed in the U.S.A. Crystal Structure of Mammalian Cysteine Dioxygenase A NOVEL MONONUCLEAR IRON CENTER FOR CYSTEINE THIOL OXIDATION* Received for publication, February 17, 2006, and in revised form, March 30, 2006 Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 11, 2006, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M601555200 Chad R. Simmons‡, Qun Liu§, Qingqiu Huang§, Quan Hao§, Tadhg P. Begley¶, P. Andrew Karplusʈ1, and Martha H. Stipanuk‡2 From the ‡Division of Nutritional Sciences, §Macromolecular Diffraction Facility at Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (MacCHESS), and the ¶Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-8001 and the ʈDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-4501 Cysteine dioxygenase is a mononuclear iron-dependent enzyme to yield cysteine. In addition, CDO activity is essential for the biosyn- responsible for the oxidation of cysteine with molecular oxygen to thesis of taurine, which is formed by the decarboxylation of cysteine form cysteine sulfinate. This reaction commits cysteine to either sulfinate to hypotaurine and further oxidation of hypotaurine to taurine. catabolism to sulfate and pyruvate or the taurine biosynthetic path- Clinical evidence indicates that a block in cysteine catabolism, way. Cysteine dioxygenase is a member of the cupin superfamily of thought to be at CDO, leads to an altered cysteine to sulfate ratio that is Downloaded from proteins. The crystal structure of recombinant rat cysteine dioxyge- associated with sulfate depletion and other adverse effects (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cysteamine Dioxygenase
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Chemistry Theses Department of Chemistry 5-7-2016 Investigation Of A Novel Mammalian Thiol Dioxygenase Structure: Human Cysteamine Dioxygenase Tseng Xiong [email protected] Tseng Xiong Georgia State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/chemistry_theses Recommended Citation Xiong, Tseng and Xiong, Tseng, "Investigation Of A Novel Mammalian Thiol Dioxygenase Structure: Human Cysteamine Dioxygenase." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2016. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/chemistry_theses/85 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Chemistry at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chemistry Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVESTIGATION OF A NOVEL MAMMALIAN THIOL DIOXYGENASE STRUCTURE: HUMAN CYSTEAMINE DIOXYGENASE by TSENG XIONG Under the Direction of Aimin Liu, PhD ABSTRACT In 2007, a gene homolog of CDO encoded by the gene Gm237 in the DUF164 family was identified as cysteamine dioxygenase (ADO). ADO is one of the only known thiol dioxygenases found in mammals. Both ADO and its partner cysteine dioxygenase (CDO) are non-heme iron dependent enzymes that play a crucial role in the biosynthesis of taruine/hypotaurine by insertion of a dioxygen molecule. However, ADO has been overshadowed by CDO as heavy research focus on CDO over the past decade has led to the elucidation of its structure and possible mechanistic properties. In an effort to further understand ADO’s mechanism and regulating role in vivo, this work will be focused on the mammalian hADO and trying to gain further insight on hADO’s structural features via crystallography work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficiency of Enzymatic L-Cysteine Oxidation in Mammalian Systems Derives from the Optimal Organization of the Active Site of Cysteine Dioxygenase
    The Efficiency of Enzymatic L-Cysteine Oxidation in Mammalian Systems Derives from the Optimal Organization of the Active Site of Cysteine Dioxygenase by Catherine Wangui Njeri A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 4, 2014 Copyright 2014 by Catherine Wangui Njeri Approved by Holly R. Ellis, Chair, Associate Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry Douglas C. Goodwin, Associate professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry Evert E. Duin, Associate Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry Paul A. Cobine, Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences Benson T. Akingbemi, Associate Professor of Anatomy Abstract Intracellular concentrations of free cysteine in mammalian organisms are maintained within a healthy equilibrium by the mononuclear iron-dependent enzyme, cysteine dioxygenase (CDO). CDO catalyzes the oxidation of L-cysteine to L-cysteine sulfinic acid (L-CSA), by incorporating both atoms of molecular oxygen into the thiol group of L-cysteine. The product of this reaction, L-cysteine sulfinic acid, lies at a metabolic branch-point that leads to the formation of pyruvate and sulfate or taurine. The available three-dimensional structures of CDO have revealed the presence of two very interesting features within the active site (1-3). First, in close proximity to the active site iron, is a covalent crosslink between Cys93 and Tyr157. The functions of this structure and the factors that lead to its biogenesis in CDO have been a subject of vigorous investigation. Purified recombinant CDO exists as a mixture of the crosslinked and non crosslinked isoforms, and previous studies of CDO have involved a heterogenous mixture of the two.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Nonheme Iron Center of Cysteamine Dioxygenase
    J_ID: JBC Date: 21-July-20 4/Color Figure(s): F1,2,4-8 ART: RA120.013915 Page: 1 Total Pages: 15 ARTICLE Characterization of the nonheme iron center of cysteamine dioxygenase and its interaction with substrates Received for publication, April 16, 2020, and in revised form, June 25, 2020 Published, Papers in Press, June 28, 2020, DOI 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013915 AQ:au Yifan Wang1 , Ian Davis1,2 , Yan Chan2, Sunil G. Naik†, Wendell P. Griffith1 , and Aimin Liu1,2,* AQ:aff From the 1Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at San Antonio, Texas, United States and 2Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States Edited by Ruma Banerjee Cysteamine dioxygenase (ADO) has been reported to exhibit ygenases is associated with oxidative stress, autoimmune and two distinct biological functions with a nonheme iron center. It neurodegenerative diseases (11–18). catalyzes oxidation of both cysteamine in sulfur metabolism Additionally, some thiol dioxygenases oxidize N-terminal and N-terminal cysteine-containing proteins or peptides, such cysteine to cysteine sulfinic acid in polypeptides to regulate as regulator of G protein signaling 5 (RGS5). It thereby pre- protein stability (Fig. 1B). For example, plant cysteine oxidase serves oxygen homeostasis in a variety of physiological proc- (PCO) promotes the N-terminal thiol dioxygenation of VII eth- esses. However, little is known about its catalytic center and ylene response factors in normoxia to precede arginylation, how it interacts with these two types of primary substrates in resulting in proteasomal degradation (19). Recently, this type of addition to O . Here, using electron paramagnetic resonance 2 posttranslational modification mediated by thiol dioxygenases (EPR), Mössbauer, and UV-visible spectroscopies, we explored the binding mode of cysteamine and RGS5 to human and mouse was reported in ADO (20).
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemical, Kinetic and Spectroscopic Characterizations Of
    BIOCHEMICAL, KINETIC AND SPECTROSCOPIC CHARACTERIZATIONS OF NON-HEME IRON OXYGENASE ENZYMES by BISHNU P SUBEDI Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Science The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2015 Copyright © by Bishnu P Subedi 2014 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements I would like to express my greatest appreciation and thanks to my advisor Professor Brad S Pierce for giving me the opportunity to work in his lab and providing valuable guidance and encouragement during the research period. I would also like to thank Professor Frank W Foss both for being a member in my thesis committee and a collaborator on MiaE project. My sincerest thanks goes to Professor Frederick MacDonnell for his valuable suggestions as a chair in my thesis committee. I also thank the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at The University of Texas at Arlington for supporting my graduate study, the UTA Shimadzu Center for Advanced Analytical Chemistry for the use of HPLC and LC-MS/MS instrumentation utilized in this work, and the UTA Center for Nanostructured Materials for the use of EPR facilities. I would also like to thank Professor Paul Lindahl and Dr. Mrinmoy Chakrabarti, Texas A&M University for their generous assistance in collecting Mössbauer spectra for MiaE, similarly Professor Brian Fox and Justin Acheson, University of Wisconsin, Madison for collaboration on MiaE structural study and Professor Tim Larson, Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry for the IPTG inducible Azotobacter vinelandii CDO expression vector.
    [Show full text]
  • Autocrine IFN Signaling Inducing Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses By
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 23, 2021 Inducing is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 11 of which you can access for free at: 2013; 191:2956-2966; Prepublished online 16 from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication August 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300376 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/2956 A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang, Kohtaro Ooka, Xiaoyong Sun, Ruchi Shah, Swati Bhattacharyya, Jun Wei and John Varga J Immunol cites 49 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/08/20/jimmunol.130037 6.DC1 This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/2956.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 23, 2021. The Journal of Immunology A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Inducing Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang,* Kohtaro Ooka,* Xiaoyong Sun,† Ruchi Shah,* Swati Bhattacharyya,* Jun Wei,* and John Varga* Activation of TLR3 by exogenous microbial ligands or endogenous injury-associated ligands leads to production of type I IFN.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Figures 04 12 2017
    Jung et al. 1 SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES 2 3 Supplemental Figure 1. Clinical relevance of natural product methyltransferases (NPMTs) in brain disorders. (A) 4 Table summarizing characteristics of 11 NPMTs using data derived from the TCGA GBM and Rembrandt datasets for 5 relative expression levels and survival. In addition, published studies of the 11 NPMTs are summarized. (B) The 1 Jung et al. 6 expression levels of 10 NPMTs in glioblastoma versus non‐tumor brain are displayed in a heatmap, ranked by 7 significance and expression levels. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. 8 2 Jung et al. 9 10 Supplemental Figure 2. Anatomical distribution of methyltransferase and metabolic signatures within 11 glioblastomas. The Ivy GAP dataset was downloaded and interrogated by histological structure for NNMT, NAMPT, 12 DNMT mRNA expression and selected gene expression signatures. The results are displayed on a heatmap. The 13 sample size of each histological region as indicated on the figure. 14 3 Jung et al. 15 16 Supplemental Figure 3. Altered expression of nicotinamide and nicotinate metabolism‐related enzymes in 17 glioblastoma. (A) Heatmap (fold change of expression) of whole 25 enzymes in the KEGG nicotinate and 18 nicotinamide metabolism gene set were analyzed in indicated glioblastoma expression datasets with Oncomine. 4 Jung et al. 19 Color bar intensity indicates percentile of fold change in glioblastoma relative to normal brain. (B) Nicotinamide and 20 nicotinate and methionine salvage pathways are displayed with the relative expression levels in glioblastoma 21 specimens in the TCGA GBM dataset indicated. 22 5 Jung et al. 23 24 Supplementary Figure 4.
    [Show full text]