Sf Dog Parks

Copy Link

www.dogster.com www.doggoes.com/parks/california/san‐francisco Legend: 1. Alamo Park Off Leash Dog Area Fenced Park Hayes and Scott On‐leash 2. Allyne Park – Fenced – on leash only Green and Gough St. On and Off Leash areas 3. Alta Plaza Park Off Leash Dog Area Open space Jackson and Steiner 4. Baker Beach Off Leash Dog Area Lincoln and Bowley North end off leash 5. Bernal Heights Park Off Leash Dog Area Bernal Heights and Esmeralda 6. Brotherhood Mini Park Off Leash Dog Area Brotherhood and Head East corner between Brotherhood and Alemany 7. Buena Vista Park – Buena Vista Avenue West and Central Ave. 8. Candlestick Point State Recreation Area 9. Christopher’s playground – 5290 Diamond Heights Blvd 10. Corona Heights Dog Park Museum and Roosevelt 11. Crissy Field Off Leash Dog Area ‐ Open May to July Marine Dr 12. Crocker Amazon Park Off Leash Dog Area La Grande and Dublin (end of Dublin) 13. Dolores Park Off Leash Dog Area 19th and Dolores 14. Douglass Dog Park 800 27th St and Douglass St (Upper Douglas) 15. Duboce Park Off Leash Dog Area Duboce Ave and Scott St 16. Esprit Park or DogPatch Minnesota St between 19th and 20th North side off leash – south side on leash 17. Eureka Valley Dog Park 19th and Collingwood Castro neighborhood 18. Fort Funston off Leash Dog Area Skyline Blvd and John Muir Dr 19. Fort Miley Off Leash Dog Area Point Lobos and 48th 20. Franklin Square 16th and Bryant Fenced Soccer field surrounded by walking path 21. Glen Canyon Park Elk St and Bosworth St Diamond Heights 22. A. Golden Gate Park off Leash Dog Area 1 In the Southeast: There is a section by Lincoln Way, Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, as well as 5th and 7th avenues 23. Dog Park area 2 ‐ Fenced area – weekends best North west region 38th and Fulton ‐ ‐ by bison paddock 24. Dog Park Area 3 In the Northeast: area off Stanyan Street, between Hayes and Fulton streets has seen countless canines throughout the years. 25. Dog park area 4 South West Region of the Park: bordered by MLK Jr. and Middle drives, and 34th and 38th avenues. 26. Heron’s Head Park – on leash west end –Far East end off leash Jennings and Cargo Way 27. Jefferson Square Park Off Leash Dog Area Laguna and Eddy North West end 28. Juan Batista Circle – Between 19th ave and Lake Merced 29. Kite Hill –open space Yukon and 19th St. 30. Lafayette Park Off Leash Dog Area Sacramento and Gough St Southwest Corner –Sacramento and Gough 31. Lake Merced Off Leash Dog Area Lake Merced Blvd and Middlefiled Drive 32. Lands’ End Beach Off Leash Dog Area El Camino Del mar Obey signs 33. Marina Green Marina Blvd. and Marina Green Dr. 34. McKinley Square Park Off Leash Dog Area San Bruno Ave and 20th St 35. McLaren Park Off Leash Dog Area 1 John F Shelley Drive and Mansell St 36. McLaren Park Off Leash Dog Area 2 Geneva South Entrance 37. Mission Creek Dog Park 485 Berry Street near 7th 38. Mountain Lake Park Off Leash Dog Area Lake St and 8th 39. Panhandle Park – EAST end Fell and Baker 40. Parkmerced Dog Run 100 Garces 41. Pine Lake Park (Stern Grove) Off Leash Dog Area Crestlake and Vale North side of park – off leash 42. Potrero Hill Mini‐Park Off Leash Dog Area 22nd and Arkansas Entrance end of Connecticut Has fenced in ball field 43. Precita Park 3200 Folsom St 44. Rincon Hill Dog Park (Beale and Bryant) Beale and Bryant New opening 2/12 45. South Park South Park Ave and Third 46. St. Mary's Dog Park Murray and Justin 47. Upper Noe Dog Park ‐ Fenced 30th and Church 48. Walter Haas Dog Park Diamond Heights and Addison Out of San Francisco Alameda Dog Park – fenced Central and 8th St. Cesar Chavez Park – Berkeley – on and off leash areas Spinnaker way Commodore Dog park – Fenced Commodore and Cherry Ave – San Bruno Small and large dog areas Point Isabel – Richmond 1 Isabel St. .

Recommended publications

1 2409 Sacramento Street, San Francisco, Ca 3 Unit Mixed

1 Presented by The Hooper Group 2409 SACRAMENTO STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 3 UNIT MIXED USE BUILDING | $3,495,000 2 2409 SACRAMENTO STREET The Opportunity Zephyr Real Estate is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire 2409 Sacramento Street, a 3 unit mixed-use building in the proclaimed district of Pacific Heights. Spanning 4,069 sq ft (per graphic artist) and over 3 floors, this opportunity is only half a block to the prime location of Fillmore Street. The property is offered at $3,495,000. All offers to be submitted to the exclusive listing agent: The Hooper Group Tyron Hooper 415.728.2294 [email protected] Lic# 01788530 The Hooper Group • Tyron Hooper • 415.728.2294 • [email protected] • 2523 California St, San Francisco, CA • ZephyrRE.com 3 2409 SACRAMENTO STREET Rent Roll APPROX. CURRENT MARKET LEASE LEASE UNIT TYPE SQ. FT. RENTS RENTS DATE TERM 2409 A Sacramento Top 2 floors 1,294 sq. ft. * $5,359 $7,000 Aug-14 Jul-19 2409 Sacramento Unit 1 - Ground Floor Front Vacant 825 sq. ft. * $5,141 $5,000 Vacant Vacant 2409 Sacramento Unit 2 - Ground Floor Rear Accupuncture 1,681 sq. ft. $4,372 $6,000 Jan-10 Dec-19 Lobby 270 sq. ft. Monthly Rent $14,872 $18,000 Annual Rent $178,464 $216,000 * Most recent rent for Unit 1 - Ground Floor Front * Market rent for 2409 A Sacramento - This space could be used for a variety of uses from Private Offices to Residential The Hooper Group • Tyron Hooper • 415.728.2294 • [email protected] • 2523 California St, San Francisco, CA • ZephyrRE.com 4 2409 SACRAMENTO STREET Income & Expenses
Copyrighted Material

11_571869 bindex.qxd 10/21/04 7:11 PM Page 172 Index See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes below. GENERAL INDEX Architectural highlights, 130–131 Area codes, 28 Art Festival, Union Street, 5 A AA (American Automobile Art galleries, 141 Association), 12 Asian Art Museum, 113–114 Aardvark’s, 150–151 ATMs (automated teller machines), 1 AARP, 9 Avenue Cyclery, 133 Ab Fits, 146 Avis, 26 Accommodations, 33–65. See also Accommodations Index The Castro, 63–64 Cow Hollow, 60–62 B aker Beach, 128, 132–133 family-friendly, 54–55 Bambuddha Lounge, 162–163 The Financial District, 57–58 Barnes & Noble, 141 Fisherman’s Wharf, 58–60 Bars, 163–169 with free parking, 49 BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit), 10, 25 Japantown, 62–63 Baseball, 137 The Marina, 60–62 Basketball, 137 Nob Hill, 46–50 Bay Area Reporter, 9, 169 North Beach, 58–60 Bay Area Theatresports (BATS), Pacific Heights, 60–62 157–158 pricing categories, 34 Bay Guardian, 16 near San Francisco International Bayporter Express, 11 Airport, 64–65 Bay to Breakers Foot Race, SoMa, 50–57 4, 135–136 Union Square, 35–46 Beach Blanket Babylon, 158 A.C.T. (American Conservatory Beaches, 132 Theater), 156 Be-At Line, 159 Addresses, finding, 17 Belden Place cafes, 73 Alabaster, 148 Biking, 133 A La Carte, A La Park, 6 Biordi Art Imports, 148 Alamo car-rental agency, 26 Birkenstock, 150 Alamo Square Historic District, 130 The Bliss Bar, 163 Alcatraz Island, 105, 108 Blue & Gold Fleet, 28, 108, 131–132 American Automobile Association Boating, 133–134 (AAA), 12 Boat tours, 131–132 American Conservatory
San Francisco, California

updated: 10.18.2017 Compressed Area - 4.5 Miles 2.5 Miles B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R Fort Point Blue & Gold Blue & Gold San Francisco Bay Red & Fleet to Fleet to Vallejo, 1 Cable Car Route Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco, California USA White Fleet Angel Island Jack London Square 1 (toll south bound) San Francisco Bay Cruise Sausalito & & Oakland Street Car (F-Line) Maritime Tiburon & Bay Cruise Golden Gate National Recreation Area Alcatraz Ferry Service MasonCrissy St Field National PIER Historical Park 45 43 41 39 One Way Traffic 47 431/2 Pre Marina Green s Hyde St id l io Aquatic End of One Way Traffic l Pa rkwa Marina Blvd Pier d y e Park Blue & Gold v l Cervantes Blvd Direction of w Lin Jefferson St Ferry Pier 35 o B co MARINA Fort Mason The Highway Ramps Cruise Terminal D l The Walt n n Cannery Anchorage 2 l E 2 c m 33 Disney FISHERMANS Photo Vantage Points o B ba M c Family Palace Beach St Beach St r l c v n Museum Ghirardelli a & Scenic Views i WHARF d Baker d of Fine Arts L (Main Post) GGNRA Square e North Point St ro 31 BART Station Beach North Point St Headquarters t Shopping Area S Bay St Bay St Bay St Pier 27 a Alcatraz Departure Terminal Parks br James R. Herman m Cruise Terminal R Alha Moscone Francisco St Francisco St 3 Beaches Letterman i Lincoln Blvd c 3 h Rec Ctr THE Veterans Blvd Digital Arts a Chestnut St Points of Interest Center Aver Chestnut St TELEGRAPH EMBARCADERO ds “Crookedest HILL o Hospitals n d Lombard St Gen.
Section 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4- Biological Resources

SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4- BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the existing sensitive biological resources of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (the Estuary) that could be affected by project-related construction and locally increased levels of boating use, identifies potential impacts to those resources, and recommends mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate those impacts. The Initial Study for this project identified potentially significant impacts on shorebirds and rafting waterbirds, marine mammals (harbor seals), and wetlands habitats and species. The potential for spread of invasive species also was identified as a possible impact. 3.4.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SETTING HABITATS WITHIN AND AROUND SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY The vegetation and wildlife of bayland environments varies among geographic subregions in the bay (Figure 3.4-1), and also with the predominant land uses: urban (commercial, residential, industrial/port), urban/wildland interface, rural, and agricultural. For the purposes of discussion of biological resources, the Estuary is divided into Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, Central San Francisco Bay, and South San Francisco Bay (See Figure 3.4-2). The general landscape structure of the Estuary’s vegetation and habitats within the geographic scope of the WT is described below. URBAN SHORELINES Urban shorelines in the San Francisco Estuary are generally formed by artificial fill and structures armored with revetments, seawalls, rip-rap, pilings, and other structures. Waterways and embayments adjacent to urban shores are often dredged. With some important exceptions, tidal wetland vegetation and habitats adjacent to urban shores are often formed on steep slopes, and are relatively recently formed (historic infilled sediment) in narrow strips.
Late Holocene Anthropogenic Depression of Sturgeon in San Francisco Bay, California

Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol. 35, No. 1 (2015) | pp. 3–27 Late Holocene Anthropogenic Depression of Sturgeon in San Francisco Bay, California JACK M. BROUGHTON Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 ERIK P. MARTIN Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 BRIAN MCENEANEY McEaneaney Construction Inc, 10182 Worchester Cir., Truckee, CA 96161 THOMAS WAKE Zooarchaeology Laboratory, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles DWIGHT D. SIMONS Consulting Archaeologist, 2334 Tiffany Way, Chico, CA Prehistoric resource depression has been widely documented in many late Holocene contexts characterized by expanding human population densities, and has been causally linked to a wide range of other significant changes in human behavior and biology. Some of the more detailed records of this phenomenon have been derived from the San Francisco Bay area of California, including a possible case of anthropogenic sturgeon depression, but evidence for the latter was derived from limited fish-bone samples. We synthesize and analyze a massive ichthyoarchaeological data set here, including over 83,000 identified fish specimens from 30 site components in the central San Francisco Bay, to further test this hypothesis. Allometric live weight relationships from selected elements are established to reconstruct size change in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) through time, and—collectively—the data show significant linear declines over the last 3,000 years in the relative abundance of sturgeon compared to all other identified fishes, as well as declines in the maximum and mean weights of the harvested fish. Both these patterns are consistent with resource depression and do not appear to be related to changes in the estuarine paleoenvironment.
Fort Funston, Panama Mounts for 155Mm Golden Gate National

Fort Funston, Panama Mounts for 155mm Guns HAERNo. CA-193-A B8'•'■ANffiA. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Skyline Boulevard and Great Highway San Francisco San Francisco County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 38 ) HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD • FORT FUNSTON, PANAMA MOUNTS FOR 155mm GUNS HAERNo.CA-193-A Location: Fort Funston, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, City and County of San Francisco, California Fort Funston is located between Skyline Boulevard and the Pacific Ocean, west of Lake Merced. The Battery Bluff Panama mounts were located at Fort Funston, 1,200 feet north of Battery Davis' gun No. 1, close to the edge of the cliff overlooking the beach Date of Construction: 1937 Engineer: United States Army Corps of Engineers Builder: United States Army Corps of Engineers Present Owner: United States National Park Service Golden Gate National Recreation Area Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Present Use: Not Currently Used Due to erosion, Battery Bluff Panama mounts have slipped to the beach below where they are still visible Significance: The Panama mounts of Battery Bluff are significant as they are a contributing feature to the Fort Funston Historic District which is considered eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The Panama mounts were the only guns of its type to be emplaced in the San Francisco Harbor Defenses. Report Prepared By: Darlene Keyer Carey & Co. Inc., Historic Preservation Architects 123 Townsend Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94107 Date: February 26, 1998 r FORT FUNSTON, PANAMA MOUNTS FOR 155mm GUNS HAERNO.CA-193-A PAGE 2 HISTORY OF FORT FUNSTON Fort Funston Historic District Fort Funston, which is located in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), was determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places in 1980 and is now considered the Fort Funston Historic District.
Outdoor Fitness FAQ (Updated: 8/23/20)

Outdoor Fitness FAQ (Updated: 8/23/20) Outdoor Fitness FAQ Contents 1. What is the difference between small and large group fitness? .......................................................... 1 2. Can I apply for both the small group license and a large group permit?.............................................. 1 3. What is the fee for a small group license? ............................................................................................ 1 4. What certifications are required for a small group license? ................................................................ 2 5. What equipment can I bring to the workout and setup ....................................................................... 2 6. What is the fee for a large group permit? ............................................................................................ 2 7. Do all applicants for a large group permit, with and without studios, participate in the lottery? ....... 2 8. What locations are reservable under a large group permit? ................................................................ 2 9. What is a lottery slot? ........................................................................................................................... 2 10. How will the lottery for large group permits work? ............................................................................. 3 11. What is the cost for each slot? ............................................................................................................. 3 12. Are these classes still only
Masonic1421 Avenue

Masonic1421 Avenue Important Details Ashbury Heights View Condo F One-Bedroom, One-Bathroom Condo in a Six-Unit Building F Elegant Ashbury Heights Location F Gorgeous Architectural Details Danielle Lazier: SFHotlist Team F Remodeled Kitchen and Bath [email protected] 415.528.7355 calBRE 01340326 F One-Car Parking • F Shared Laundry F Extra Storage We are San Francisco’s premier real estate team. F Easy Downtown and Cross-City Commutes via the 6-Haight, We have a track record of delivering superior results and 37-Corbett, 33-Ashbury, and 43 Masonic Bus Lines creating happy clients. Here’s what we can do for you. F Close to Parks, Restaurants, and Practical Amenities F Walk Score: 93 Top 1% in SF Property Sales. We offer dedicated client care, massive sales experience, and unparalleled F 1,033 Square Feet Per Tax Record access to the best listings and buyers. In 2015, we sold more than $100M F HOA Fee: $337 Per Month in real estate, putting us in the top 1% of all SF agents. We have the buyers you want. We regularly interact with dozens of buyers looking to own in San Francisco. Whether via email, in person, or on social media, we know how, when and where to find the right buyers for your home. You benefit from our relationships. Real estate is about relationships. If you are represented by a well-known Realtor Asking: $899,000 with a great reputation, you will get the inside scoop on a home and have a higher chance of having your offer accepted.
Conservancy Report

San Francisco Public Space Management Study Report May 2018 Project team BRIAN GUINEY / @FIVEALIVE55 Kearstin Krehbiel, Consultant Amy Cohen, Director, Neighborhood Program Development Robin Abad Ocubillo, Senior Planner Jeremy Shaw, Planner / Urban Designer Jack Tse, Urbanist May 14, 2018 | 2 kearstinkrehbiel.com/conservancy Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Why are public spaces important? What are the challenges? 1 What are the place-types? Who are the stakeholders? RESEARCH Project overview. Surveys and interviews. Demand for services. Case 2 Studies. Available public funds. Feedback from City stakeholders. MODEL Defining the model. Serving and creating stewards. Governance. 3 Equity. Benefits of the model. Core services. LAUNCH 4 Three launch scenarios: Continue Business Planning, Partially-funded, Fully-funded. Staffing and budget sketches. Which types of public-private partnerships can meet the management needs of San Francisco public open spaces? The character of San Francisco can be seen in its myriad public spaces and in the unique ways that we create, care for, and use these places. This report seeks to identify a need and propose a model and a plan to launch a public-private partnership that will elevate our public spaces and the communities that care for them. May 14, 2018 | 3 kearstinkrehbiel.com/conservancy Intro Why? What? Where? Who? GETTY IMAGES Why are public spaces so important? ROBERT COUSE-BAKER/FLICKR PUBLIC SPACES CONNECT US Parks, plazas, and sidewalks are where we meet, relax, play, and express civic values. Public spaces also serve as a critical asset to low-income families and people living in dense neighborhoods. Public spaces provide the opportunity for people to build community in an increasingly divided city, and well-managed public spaces help to build trust in government.
2012 San Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Status Report Presented to the CITIZENS’ GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

2012 San Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Status Report Presented to the CITIZENS’ GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE May 2018 McLaren Bike Park Opening Prepared by: Antonio Guerra, Capital Finance Manager, Recreation and Parks 415‐581‐2554, [email protected] Ananda Hirsch, Capital Manager, Port of San Francisco 415‐274‐0442, [email protected] 2012 San Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Status Report Presented to the CITIZENS’ GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE May 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Program Budget Project Revenues 2 Project Expenditures 4 Project Schedules 6 Project Status Summaries 8 Citywide Programs 2930 Citywide Parks 3334 Executive Summary San Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Bond Program Budget $M Neighborhood Parks In November 2012, 71.6% of voters approved Proposition B for a Angelo J. Rossi Playground 8.2 $195 million General Obligation Bond, known as the 2012 San Balboa Park 7 Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond (the “bond”). Garfield Square 11 George Chri s topher Playground 2.8 This funding will continue a decade of investment in the aging Gilman Playground 1.8 infrastructure of our park system. Specifically, the bond Glen Ca nyon Park 12 allocates: Hyde & Turk Mini Park 1 Joe DiMaggio Playground 5.5 Margaret S. Hayward Playground 14 $99 million for Neighborhood Parks, selected based on Moscone Recreation Center 1.5 community feedback, their physical condition, the variety of Mountain Lake Park 2 amenities offered,
Goga Wrfr.Pdf

The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
Glen Park News Spring 2014

SPRING 2014 VOLUME 32, NO. 1 Muni Reworks 35-Eureka Line New Playground Comes Alive Reroute Plan he San Francisco Municipal Transportaion Agency appears T ready to back off its controver- sial rerouting plan to run the 35-Eureka by bus along Diamond Zachary Street and eliminate Clark direct bus service to another portion of Glen Park altogether, after neighbors rallied to stop the proposed change. Muni’s original proposal, unveiled last winter, called for eliminating the 35-Eureka’s current loop along Moffitt, Bemis and Addison streets and extend the route south along Diamond Street to serve the Glen Park BART station. The 35-Eureka proposal is part of the San Francisco Municipal Transpor- tation Agency’s Transit Effectiveness Project, which aims make the public transit system more efficient, reliable, safe and comfortable for its riders, in part by overhauling routes. The goal behind the 35-Eureka Glen Park children and parents enjoy the playground during opening week. Photo by Liz Mangelsdorf change is to provide a direct Muni link between the Castro and Noe Val- ids being kids, they would not draw was the canyon. Now, it feels like ley neighborhoods and the Glen Park wait for the official inaugura- the playground is a destination, too.” BART station. K tion of the renovated Glen Can- The $5.8 million Glen Canyon Park While many residents are in favor yon Park Playground. They poured in playground improvements were funded of connecting the bus to BART, there before the speeches were over, before by the voter-backed 2008 Clean and was fierce opposition to the Diamond by the ribbon was cut.