(Apidae: Meliponini): Suitability of the Bee Species for Meliponiculture in the Argentinean Chaco Region Favio Vossler

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Apidae: Meliponini): Suitability of the Bee Species for Meliponiculture in the Argentinean Chaco Region Favio Vossler Flower visits, nesting and nest defence behaviour of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini): suitability of the bee species for meliponiculture in the Argentinean Chaco region Favio Vossler To cite this version: Favio Vossler. Flower visits, nesting and nest defence behaviour of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini): suitability of the bee species for meliponiculture in the Argentinean Chaco region. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2012, 43 (2), pp.139-161. 10.1007/s13592-011-0097-6. hal-01003637 HAL Id: hal-01003637 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01003637 Submitted on 1 Jan 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2012) 43:139–161 Original article * INRA, DIB-AGIB and Springer-Verlag, France, 2012 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-011-0097-6 Flower visits, nesting and nest defence behaviour of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini): suitability of the bee species for meliponiculture in the Argentinean Chaco region Favio Gerardo VOSSLER CONICET, Laboratorio de Sistemática y Biología Evolutiva (LASBE). Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n., 1900 La Plata, Argentina Received 28 March 2011 – Revised 31 August 2011 – Accepted 18 September 2011 Abstract – Four bionomical features are here described for the seven stingless bees that inhabit a new meliponine beekeeping area: the Argentinean Chaco region. The most commonly visited plants were of herbaceous habits, predominantly had flowers of white/creamy to yellowish colour, with small-sized flowers and were of moderate mass-flowering degree. Lestrimelitta chacoana was the only robber species. The most commonly found nesting substrate was large living tree trunks, and most nests were found at the base of the trunks. Sometimes, nesting substrates and floral resources were provided by the same woody plant. Cryptic small- to medium-sized cerumen tube-like unornamented nest entrances were the most commonly found. Nest defence included aggressive (Scaptotrigona jujuyensis) and docile behaviour; the latter was classified into timid and non-timid. A key to identify the Meliponini fauna of this region is provided. The regional pattern of bionomical features seems to be associated with subtropical climate conditions. The majority of these bee species are suitable for Meliponiculture in the Chaco region. aggressive bee / dead tree trunk / docile bee / living tree trunk / subtropical Meliponini bees Around the world, stingless bees display 1. INTRODUCTION considerable diversity in food sources, nesting substrates, nest entrance architecture and nest Meliponini are the eusocial bees characteris- defence behaviour (Schwarz 1948; Wille and tic of the moist tropics of the world, and their Michener 1973; Roubik 1982, 2006; Camargo richness decreases towards the temperate and Roubik 1991; Camargo and Pedro 2002, regions of the subtropics (Michener 1990; Alves 2004; Couvillon et al. 2008; Rasmussen and dos Santos 1999). In the Neotropical region, Camargo 2008). Like all bees excepting the stingless bee distribution extends to about 35° S parasite genera, they forage on flowers for (Michener 2007), including the Chaco forests of pollen and nectar. Stingless bees are polylectic central South America (the Chaco region). or generalists because they collect pollen from several non-related plant families (Robertson 1925; Michener 2007). Sugar sources are Corresponding author: F.G. Vossler, commonly supplied by nectar from flowers. [email protected] However, hemipterophily (collection of honey- Manuscript editor: Klaus Hartfelder dew) exists in some Trigona species, Oxy- 140 F.G. Vossler trigona tataira (Smith), and Schwarzula cocci- like, funnel-like, mouth-like, etc.), size and dophila Camargo and Pedro (Laroca and Saka- external sculpturing (presence of root-like kibara 1976; Camargo and Pedro 2002). Pollen projections in Lestrimelitta, etc.; Wille and is the main protein source; however, animal Michener 1973; Roubik 19839, , 198 2006; protein can also be consumed. Facultative Camargo and Pedro 2003). necrophagy occurs in Melipona grandis Gué- Nest defence behaviour from humans has rin, Cephalotrigona capitata (Smith) and been classified in different ways. Michener Trigona pallens (Fabricius), among others, (1961) grouped Australian and New Guinean and obligate necrophagy in the Trigona cras- Trigona s.l. as non-aggressive, moderately sipes species group (Schwarz 1948; Roubik aggressive and strongly aggressive. Roubik 1982; Camargo and Roubik 1991;Noll1997; (2006), reviewing the nest defence behaviour Rasmussen and Camargo 2008). Furthermore, of the Meliponini, included timid (if bees retreat Lestrimelitta and Cleptotrigona species, Meli- within the nest entrance when approached by an pona fuliginosa Lepeletier and possibly Tri- intruder), aggressive (if bees attack the intruder) chotrigona extranea Camargo and Moure are and tremendously aggressive (if bees use irritant robbers of pollen and honey stored in the nests chemical defence, as in Oxytrigona, or if they of other stingless bee genera (Sakagami and bite hard whilst applying sticky resin, as in Laroca 1953; Roubik 1983; Camargo and Ptilotrigona). Couvillon et al. (2008) grouped Pedro 2007b). Robber stingless bees are consid- stingless bees into aggressive, mildly defensive ered a threat to Meliponiculture as they attack, rob and timid. Rasmussen and Camargo (2008) and even kill the reared colonies (Schwarz 1948; grouped the Neotropical Trigona s.s. as aggres- Sakagami and Laroca 1953). sive vs. non-aggressive or docile. Knowledge of Meliponini colonies are perennial and most the defence behaviour of the bee species of a nests are built in preexisting hollows within region is useful for Meliponiculture practices, different substrates such as tree trunks (living allowing beekeepers to select suitable bee and dead), ground, brick walls and active nests species for rearing. of termites, ants or wasps. Most aerial nests It has been suggested by Camargo and (exposed and semi-exposed) house aggressive Moure (1994, 1996) that the Chaco region is species (Roubik 2006). Nesting substrates may an interesting area to study speciation in be species-specific and highly diverse even Meliponini due to the shared biogeographical within the same genus, e.g. Partamona, Trigona distribution of the three endemic Meliponini s.s. (Wille and Michener 1973; Roubik 1989, taxa: Geotrigona argentina Camargo and 2006; Camargo and Pedro 2003; Rasmussen Moure, Paratrigona glabella Camargo and and Camargo 2008). In the Chaco region, the Moure, and Tetragonisca fiebrigi (Schwarz). forest has been degraded mainly by agriculture, The relationship between the woody flora and logging and grazing, leaving isolated forest Meliponini bees in the Chaco forest is currently fragments. These practices constitute a threat threatened by forest fragmentation and logging. to tree trunk-dependent animals such as several In this scenario, beekeeping with Meliponini stingless bee species. bees (Meliponiculture) should be a good prac- Nest entrance architecture is species-specific tice for the conservation of both forest vegeta- and highly diverse in stingless bees (Camargo tion and native stingless bees. The cultural 1970; Roubik 2006). The nest entrance features importance of the Chaquenian stingless bees are the results of a compromise between the wasstressedbyArenas(2003). However, functional roles of defensivity and foraging several biological aspects remain scarcely un- traffic (Couvillon et al. 2008). This structure derstood. Meliponiculture has been considered include a wide variety of building material as a sustainable activity through the forests of (cerumen, mud, sand, resin, plant and animal the world due to its ecological, economic and particles, either mixed or pure), shape (tube- cultural implications (Venturieri et al. 2003). Bionomics of the Chaquenian stingless bees 141 Therefore, it can be integrated into forestry, fruit that Meliponiculture is still a rudimentary crop pollination and short cycle cultures con- practice compared with that of tropical areas. tributing to wild plant and crop pollination, honey, pollen and wax production, and preser- 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS vation of traditional knowledge about bees, as well as the conservation of this regional 2.1. Study area Meliponini fauna. To achieve an in-depth knowledge of the bionomical aspects of bees The Chaco region consists of a large sedimentary in this new meliponine beekeeping area, the plain covered by xerophylous and riverean forests of present work was conducted during different about 1,000,000 km2, extending north and south of seasons over a 6-year period and in several the Tropic of Capricorn (23° S) over northern environments (natural forests and human popu- Argentina, western Paraguay, southeastern Bolivia lated areas) from six localities. In this way, it and the extreme western edge of Mato Grosso do Sul was possible to identify a wide range of state in Brazil (Prado 1993; Figure 1). The Chaco bionomical features. forest is a semiarid forest crossed by few active rivers The bionomical features of the
Recommended publications
  • Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera)
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Mi Bee Lab 9-21-1990 Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera) Charles D. Michener University of Kansas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_mi Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Michener, Charles D., "Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera)" (1990). Mi. Paper 153. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_mi/153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Bee Lab at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 4 WWvyvlrWryrXvW-WvWrW^^ I • • •_ ••^«_«).•>.• •.*.« THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCIENC5;^ULLETIN LIBRARY Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 75-164 Sept. 21,1990 OCT 23 1990 HARVARD Classification of the Apidae^ (Hymenoptera) BY Charles D. Michener'^ Appendix: Trigona genalis Friese, a Hitherto Unplaced New Guinea Species BY Charles D. Michener and Shoichi F. Sakagami'^ CONTENTS Abstract 76 Introduction 76 Terminology and Materials 77 Analysis of Relationships among Apid Subfamilies 79 Key to the Subfamilies of Apidae 84 Subfamily Meliponinae 84 Description, 84; Larva, 85; Nest, 85; Social Behavior, 85; Distribution, 85 Relationships among Meliponine Genera 85 History, 85; Analysis, 86; Biogeography, 96; Behavior, 97; Labial palpi, 99; Wing venation, 99; Male genitalia, 102; Poison glands, 103; Chromosome numbers, 103; Convergence, 104; Classificatory questions, 104 Fossil Meliponinae 105 Meliponorytes,
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Biologia Tropical
    VOLUMEN 21 1973 SUPLEMENTO 1 UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA REVISTA BIOLOGIA TROPICAL THE NEST ARCHITECTURE OF STINGlESS BEES WITH SPECIAl REFERENCE TO THOSE OF COSTA RICA (Hymenoptera, Apidae) A. WILLE and c. D. MICHENER THE NEST ARCHITECTURE OF STINGLESS BEES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THOSE OF COSTA RICA (Hymenoptera, Apidae) 2 by Alvaro Wille 1 and Charles D. Michener CONTENTS Introduetion ...................................................................... .................................. 9 Classifieation and Nomenclature .......................................................................... 17 Nest Loeations ........................................ ...... ............ ............ ...................... ......... 17 A. General Aecount ..... .............. ............ ................ .................. .......... .... 17 B. Sites of Costa Riean Nests Studied ..................................... ............... 38 Nest Struetures ... ................. ........................ ....... ........... ..................................... 38 A. Terminology and Nest Organization .................................................. 38 l. Materials ... ......................................... ...................................... 38 2. Organization and terminology...... ............................................ 38 B. Tabular Summary of Meliponine Nest Strueture ............................... 41 1. Content and methods ............................................................... 41 2. Symbols used in the tables .... ...... ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stingless Bee Nesting Biology David W
    Stingless bee nesting biology David W. Roubik To cite this version: David W. Roubik. Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2006, 37 (2), pp.124-143. hal-00892207 HAL Id: hal-00892207 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00892207 Submitted on 1 Jan 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 37 (2006) 124–143 124 c INRA/DIB-AGIB/ EDP Sciences, 2006 DOI: 10.1051/apido:2006026 Review article Stingless bee nesting biology* David W. Ra,b a Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Panamá, República de Panamá b Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA Received 2 October 2005 – Revised 29 November 2005 – Accepted 23 December 2005 Abstract – Stingless bees diverged since the Cretaceous, have 50 times more species than Apis,andare both distinctive and diverse. Nesting is capitulated by 30 variables but most do not define clades. Both architectural features and behavior decrease vulnerability, and large genera vary in nest habit, architecture and defense. Natural stingless bee colony density is 15 to 1500 km−2. Symbionts include mycophagic mites, collembolans, leiodid beetles, mutualist coccids, molds, and ricinuleid arachnids.
    [Show full text]
  • UNA ESPECIE NUEVA DE Geotrigona (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE, MELIPONINI), CON COMENTARIOS SOBRE EL GÉNERO EN COLOMBIA
    Vol12-S2 1/25/08 7:44 PM Page 103 Acta biol. Colomb., Vol. 12 S, 2007 103 -108 UNA ESPECIE NUEVA DE Geotrigona (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE, MELIPONINI), CON COMENTARIOS SOBRE EL GÉNERO EN COLOMBIA A New Species of Geotrigona (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponini), with Comments on the Genus in Colombia VICTOR H. GONZALEZ1*, B.Sc., Ph. D.; PAULA A. SEPÚLVEDA2, M.Sc., Estudiante de Ph. D. 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Haworth Hall, 1200 Sunnyside Avenue, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7523, USA. [email protected] 2Entomología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia. [email protected] *Autor encargado de la correspondencia editorial. Presentado el 16 de junio de 2007, aceptado el 12 de agosto de 2007, correcciones el 22 de agosto de 2007. RESUMEN Se describe la abeja sin aguijón Geotrigona kaba sp. nov. de la cordillera Central de Colombia. También se presentan nuevos registros geográficos y comentarios para las otras dos especies del género que se encuentran en Colombia. Palabras clave: abejas sin aguijón, Apoidea, taxonomía. ABSTRACT We describe the stingless bee Geotrigona kaba sp. nov. from the cordillera Central of Colombia. We also provide new geographical records and comments on the other two species of the genus that occur in Colombia. Key words: Apoidea, stingless bees, taxonomy. INTRODUCCIÓN Los objetivos de este trabajo son describir una especie nueva del género de abejas socia- les sin aguijón Geotrigona Moure, 1943 (Hymenoptera, Apidae: Meliponini), y presentar una sinopsis de estas abejas en Colombia. Camargo y Moure (1996) revisaron las 16 es- pecies de Geotrigona, sin embargo, al igual que en la mayoría de las revisiones de la fauna Neotropical, ellos no tuvieron acceso a suficiente material de Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociobiology 61(4): 348-354 (December 2014) DOI: 10.13102/Sociobiology.V61i4.348-354
    Sociobiology 61(4): 348-354 (December 2014) DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.348-354 Sociobiology An international journal on social insects REVIEW The Stingless Bee Fauna In Brazil (Hymenoptera: Apidae) SRM Pedro Universidade de São Paulo, FFCLRP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil Article History Abstract The stingless bee fauna currently known from Brazil is summarized, including Edited by geographic records by Brazilian states. A total of 244 valid species and about 89 Denise Araujo Alves, ESALQ-USP, Brazil Received 06 October 2014 undescribed forms, placed in 29 genera, are recorded for the country. The survey is Initial acceptance 03 November 2014 based mainly on the Catalogue of Bees (Moure’s Bee Catalogue) and specimens housed Final acceptance 01 December 2014 in the Camargo Collection – RPSP. An evaluation of the current taxonomic status and some short comments on biology are also included. Keywords Meliponini, taxonomy, nests, geographic distribution, behavior. Corresponding author Silvia Regina de Menezes Pedro Dept. Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, FFCLRP Universidade de São Paulo, USP Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, CEP: 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto São Paulo, Brazil E-Mail: [email protected] Introduction nutrients, or maintaining the plant community by dispersing seeds and especially pollen (Gullan & Cranston, 2008). The Biological collections are essential for studying and Hymenoptera concentrate the most important groups of pollinators, understanding biodiversity because they store not only the and researchers, governments and NGOs have increasingly given specimens themselves but also important information associated their attention in the last two decades especially to the native bees with those organisms (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare in Stingless Bees
    Insect. Soc. (2016) 63:223–236 DOI 10.1007/s00040-016-0468-0 Insectes Sociaux REVIEW ARTICLE Warfare in stingless bees 1,2 1,3 4 5 C. Gru¨ter • L. G. von Zuben • F. H. I. D. Segers • J. P. Cunningham Received: 24 August 2015 / Revised: 28 January 2016 / Accepted: 6 February 2016 / Published online: 29 February 2016 Ó International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2016 Abstract Bees are well known for being industrious pol- how victim colonies are selected, but a phylogenetically linators. Some species, however, have taken to invading the controlled analysis suggests that the notorious robber bee nests of other colonies to steal food, nest material or the nest Lestrimelitta preferentially attacks colonies of species with site itself. Despite the potential mortality costs due to more concentrated honey. Warfare among bees poses many fighting with an aggressive opponent, the prospects of a interesting questions, including why species differ so large bounty can be worth the risk. In this review, we aim to greatly in their response to attacks and how these alternative bring together current knowledge on intercolony fighting strategies of obtaining food or new nest sites have evolved. with a view to better understand the evolution of warfare in bees and identify avenues for future research. A review of Keywords Stingless bees Á Warfare Á literature reveals that at least 60 species of stingless bees are Alternative foraging strategies Á Cleptoparasitism Á involved in heterospecific conflicts, either as attacking or Lestrimelitta Á Meliponini victim colonies. The threat of invasion has led to the evo- lution of architectural, behavioural and morphological adaptations, such as narrow entrance tunnels, mud balls to Introduction block the entrance, decoy nests that direct invaders away from the brood chamber, fighting swarms, and soldiers that The nest is the all-important centre of the bee’s universe, are skilled at immobilising attackers.
    [Show full text]
  • Apidae: Meliponini)
    J Comp Physiol A DOI 10.1007/s00359-016-1118-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Body size limits dim‑light foraging activity in stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) Martin Streinzer1,2 · Werner Huber3 · Johannes Spaethe1,4 Received: 23 March 2016 / Revised: 28 July 2016 / Accepted: 29 July 2016 © The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Stingless bees constitute a species-rich tribe ocelli diameter, ommatidia number, and facet diameter. of tropical and subtropical eusocial Apidae that act as All parameters significantly correlated with body size. important pollinators for flowering plants. Many foraging A disproportionately low light intensity threshold in tasks rely on vision, e.g. spatial orientation and detection the minute Trigonisca pipioli, together with a large eye of food sources and nest entrances. Meliponini workers parameter Peye suggests specific adaptations to circumvent are usually small, which sets limits on eye morphology the optical constraints imposed by the small body size. and thus quality of vision. Limitations are expected both We discuss the implications of body size in bees on forag- on acuity, and thus on the ability to detect objects from ing behavior. a distance, as well as on sensitivity, and thus on the for- aging time window at dusk and dawn. In this study, we Keywords Meliponini · Light intensity threshold · Vision · determined light intensity thresholds for flight under dim Compound eye · Body size light conditions in eight stingless bee species in relation to body size in a Neotropical lowland rainforest. Species varied in body size (0.8–1.7 mm thorax-width), and we Introduction found a strong negative correlation with light intensity thresholds (0.1–79 lx).
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Handy Bee Manual
    The Very Handy Manual: How to Catch and Identify Bees and Manage a Collection A Collective and Ongoing Effort by Those Who Love to Study Bees in North America Last Revised: October, 2010 This manual is a compilation of the wisdom and experience of many individuals, some of whom are directly acknowledged here and others not. We thank all of you. The bulk of the text was compiled by Sam Droege at the USGS Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab over several years from 2004-2008. We regularly update the manual with new information, so, if you have a new technique, some additional ideas for sections, corrections or additions, we would like to hear from you. Please email those to Sam Droege ([email protected]). You can also email Sam if you are interested in joining the group’s discussion group on bee monitoring and identification. Many thanks to Dave and Janice Green, Tracy Zarrillo, and Liz Sellers for their many hours of editing this manual. "They've got this steamroller going, and they won't stop until there's nobody fishing. What are they going to do then, save some bees?" - Mike Russo (Massachusetts fisherman who has fished cod for 18 years, on environmentalists)-Provided by Matthew Shepherd Contents Where to Find Bees ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Nets ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Netting Technique ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Botanica Brasilica
    Are native bees and Apis mellifera equally efficient pollinators of the rupestrian grassland daisy Aspilia jolyana (Asteraceae)? Maruyama, Pietro K.; Nunes, Carlos E. P.; Vizentin-bugoni, Jeferson; Gustafsson, Simone; Morellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira Published in: Acta Botanica Brasilica DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0143 Publication date: 2018 Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Maruyama, P. K., Nunes, C. E. P., Vizentin-bugoni, J., Gustafsson, S., & Morellato, L. P. C. (2018). Are native bees and Apis mellifera equally efficient pollinators of the rupestrian grassland daisy Aspilia jolyana (Asteraceae)? Acta Botanica Brasilica, 32(3), 386-391. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062018abb0143 Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 Acta Botanica Brasilica - 32(3): 386-391. July-September 2018. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0143 Are native bees and Apis mellifera equally efficient pollinators of the rupestrian grassland daisy Aspilia jolyana (Asteraceae)? Pietro K. Maruyama1,2* , Carlos E. P. Nunes1 , Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni3 , Simone Gustafsson4 and Leonor Patricia Cerdeira Morellato5 Received: April 12, 2018 Accepted: May 9, 2018 ABSTRACT Most angiosperms rely on animals for pollination, and insects, especially bees, are the most frequent pollinators. Many native Neotropical plants are frequently visited by the invasive honeybee (Apis mellifera), but its role in the pollination of these plants has been little investigated. We assessed the contribution of various floral visitors, including native bees and the honeybee, on the pollination of a generalist rupestrian grassland daisy, Aspilia jolyana (Asteraceae), in Serra do Cipó, Espinhaço Mountain Range, Brazil. We recorded floral visitors and measured the seed set resulting from one single visitation. We observed a total of 442 visits, mostly by bees, with Bombus pauloensis and Apis mellifera being the most common floral visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Revista Ciência Agronômica ISSN: 0045-6888 ISSN: 1806-6690 Universidade Federal do Ceará Mascena, Valdenio Mendes; Silva, Celso Moreira; Almeida, Cicero Lima de; Alves, Társio Thiago Lopes; Freitas, Breno Magalhães External activity of colonies of Melipona quinquefasciata managed in different types of beehive1 Revista Ciência Agronômica, vol. 49, no. 4, October-December, 2018, pp. 683-691 Universidade Federal do Ceará DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20180077 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=195358224017 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Revista Ciência Agronômica, v. 49, n. 4, p. 683-691, out-dez, 2018 Centro de Ciências Agrárias - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE Scientific Article www.ccarevista.ufc.br ISSN 1806-6690 External activity of colonies of Melipona quinquefasciata managed in different types of beehive1 Atividade externa de colônias de Melipona quinquefasciata manejada em diferentes tipos de colmeias Valdenio Mendes Mascena2*, Celso Moreira Silva3, Cicero Lima de Almeida4, Társio Thiago Lopes Alves5 and Breno Magalhães Freitas6 ABSTRACT - This study evaluated the influence of the environment and of two models of beehive (wooden box and ceramic pot) on the flight activity of the ground-nesting bee, Melipona quinquefasciata. The experiment took place in the Chapada do Araripe, in the State of Ceará, Brazil, between July 2014 and June 2015. The study followed colonies in three ceramic pots and four wooden boxes. Observations of the flight activity of the bees and of the climate were made on five days every month, each colony being monitored for 5 min, at intervals of one hour, from 0500 to 1700.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociobiology 61(4): 554-559 (December 2014) DOI: 10.13102/Sociobiology.V61i4.554-559
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS) Sociobiology 61(4): 554-559 (December 2014) DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.554-559 Sociobiology An international journal on social insects RESEARCH ARTICLE - BEES Rescue of Stingless bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) nests: an important form of mitigating impacts caused by deforestation L Costa¹, RM Franco¹, LF Guimarães¹, A Vollet-Neto¹,², FR Silva¹,², GD Cordeiro¹,² 1 - ARCADIS Logos, Divisão de Meio Ambiente, São Paulo, Brazil 2 - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Article History Abstract As stingless bees are important pollinators of wild and cultivated plants, their preservation is Edited by of vital importance to sustain the global ecosystem and to safeguard human food resources. Denise Araujo Alves, ESALQ-USP, Brazil Received 01 October 2014 The construction of large dams for the production of energy involves the removal of Initial acceptance 10 November 2014 wide extents of riparian vegetation, where many species of bees, especially Meliponini, Final acceptance 10 December 2014 build their nests. The rescue of bee colonies is essential, not only in the conservation of pollinators, but also in the use of these colonies in meliponiculture and biological Keywords research. The aim of this work was to describe the procedures used in the rescue of Fauna rescue, Pollinators, Dam, Amazon Basin, Meliponiculture. stingless bee colonies at the time of deforestation, prior to initiating construction of a large dam in the Madeira River (Amazon Basin, Brazil). With simple equipment and Corresponding author widely known methods of meliponiculture 287 stingless bee nests were rescued, of Guaraci Duran Cordeiro which 15.7% were reallocated and 26.5% perished.
    [Show full text]
  • Karyotypic Description and Repetitive DNA Chromosome Mapping of Melipona Interrupta Citation: N.M
    Firenze University Press Caryologia www.fupress.com/caryologia International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics Karyotypic description and repetitive DNA chromosome mapping of Melipona interrupta Citation: N.M. Travenzoli, I.C. de Oliveira Barbosa, G.A. Carvalho-Zilse, Latreille, 1811 (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) T.M.F. Salomão, D.M. Lopes (2019) Karyotypic description and repetitive DNA chromosome mapping of Melipo- na interrupta Latreille, 1811 (Hyme- Natália Martins Travenzoli1, Ingrid Cândido de Oliveira Barbosa2, noptera: Meliponini). Caryologia 72(2): Gislene Almeida Carvalho-Zilse2, Tânia Maria Fernandes Salomão3, 91-95. doi: 10.13128/cayologia-239 Denilce Meneses Lopes1,* Published: December 5, 2019 1 Laboratório de Citogenética de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Copyright: © 2019 N.M. Travenzoli, Federal de Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil 2 I.C. de Oliveira Barbosa, G.A. Carval- Grupo de Pesquisas em Abelhas, Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de ho-Zilse, T.M.F. Salomão, D.M. Lopes. Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), CEP 69067-375, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil This is an open access, peer-reviewed 3 Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Univer- article published by Firenze University sidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil Press (http://www.fupress.com/caryo- *Corresponding author: [email protected] logia) and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted Abstract. Heterochromatic patterns in the genus Melipona vary among subgenera spe- use, distribution, and reproduction cies. Melikerria is the only subgenus that presents species with different content of in any medium, provided the original heterochromatin.
    [Show full text]