Survey of Carnivore Species in Selected Thailand Reserves and Evidence for Competitive Exclusion by Larger Carnivores

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Survey of Carnivore Species in Selected Thailand Reserves and Evidence for Competitive Exclusion by Larger Carnivores SURVEY OF CARNIVORE SPECIES IN SELECTED THAILAND RESERVES AND EVIDENCE FOR COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION BY LARGER CARNIVORES by Megan C. Baker A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Committee: Dr. William J. McShea, Committee Member Dr. Albert P. Torzilli, Graduate Program Director Dr. Robert B. Jonas, Department Chairperson Dr. Richard Diecchio, Interim Associate Dean, Student and Academic Affairs, College of Science Dr. Peggy Agouris, Interim Dean, College of Science Date: __..:::.D::..!e::..=c~em=b~er"-6~,~2"""0~1~3~- Fall Semester 2013 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Survey of Carnivore Species in Selected Thailand Reserves and Evidence for Competitive Exclusion by Larger Carnivores A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at George Mason University by Megan C. Baker Bachelor of Science Ball State University, 2006 Director: Larry Rockwood, Professor Department of Environmental Science and Policy Spring Semester 2014 George Mason University Fairfax, VA This work is licensed under a creative commons attribution-noderivs 3.0 unported license . ii DEDICATIO To my husband, James Whatton, who has loved me and supported me through thick and thin. To my parents, David and Nanette Baker, who have always answered their phones to ease my nerves and concerns. iii ACKOWLEDGEMETS I would like to acknowledge the generosity of the following: The Point Defiance Zoo & Aquarium Conservation Committee http://www.pdza.org/conservation-research The grants awarded helped provide the supplies needed to complete this study. There are many individuals that I would like to acknowledge for their assistance and patience at various periods throughout this study including: Thanks to my family who has always supported me on my journey, Dr. JoGayle Howard who supported me and believed in my research, Dr. Tavis Forrester for always letting me ask questions and his help with analysis, Dr. Kate Jenks, Nattapol Sisuruk and Kittiwara Siripattaranukul for all their help in Thailand, Ken Lang and Jessica Kordell for their support throughout the SCBI portion of the study, Joe Taft, Jean Herrberg and Rebecca Rizzo for their support throughout the EFRC portion of the study and, Ginger Eye and Lindsay Shaefer for their assistance with videotaping at SCBI. iv TABLE OF COTETS Page List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. viii List of Abbreviations and Symbols.................................................................................... ix Abstract ............................................................................................................................... x Background into interspecific interactions among carnivores in thailand .......................... 1 Chapter one: Evidence for interspecific intraguild interactions in captive populations of tigers, leopards and clouded leopards ................................................................................. 5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 5 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 7 Study Animals ............................................................................................................. 7 Behavioral Observations ............................................................................................ 10 Data analysis .............................................................................................................. 11 Results ........................................................................................................................... 13 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 17 Future Studies ............................................................................................................ 20 Chapter 2: Survey for carnivore species in select Thailand reserves and evidence for intraguild interactions ....................................................................................................... 22 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 22 Study Area ................................................................................................................. 25 Methods ......................................................................................................................... 28 Camera Trap Data Collection .................................................................................... 28 Camera Trap Data Organization ................................................................................ 29 Species selected for analysis...................................................................................... 31 Single season, two species co-occurrence models ..................................................... 31 Temporal analysis ...................................................................................................... 32 Results ........................................................................................................................... 33 v Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 42 Appendix ........................................................................................................................... 49 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................. 58 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 1. Data on individuals observed in a captive behavioral study. Missing data on leopard ages is due to lack of information on the individual at rescue. All individuals were of reproductive age at the time of the study. Tigers and leopards were observed at Exotic Feline Rescue Center and clouded leopards observed at Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute.................................................................................................................. 9 Table 2. A list of the behaviors observed and the total frequency (per 15 minute observation session) at which they occured (derived from raw count data). For analysis purposes, the behaviors were placed into three categories: neutral (state behaviors), investigative (event behaviors) and avoidance (state behavior) behaviors. ...................... 12 Table 3. The mean ± standard error of behavioral responses (count/15 minutes) of each species observed to the four fecal sample treatments (clouded leopard, leopard, tiger and control). The F statistic represents the differences among the three species observed for each treatment applied. Asterisks (*) denotes significant differences (p < 0.05). ............ 13 Table 4. Descriptions of the covariates used to model carnivore species interactions within Thailand protected areas. Their use within the model as a detection or occupancy covariate is listed............................................................................................................... 30 Table 5. Species dyads used to investigate interactions in carnivores species including the data used to model the species and the variables used in the top model for detection and occupancy. ........................................................................................................................ 35 Table 6. Variables used to model Tiger/Leopard and Dhole/Golden Jackal interactions. Occupancy parameter estimates Phi, Psi A and Psi B ± SE are listed with the three different variables used within the model. ........................................................................ 37 Table 7. The relative abundances (per 100 camera nights) of tigers, leopards, large and medium prey species found in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary. ............................ 38 Table 8. The number of detections (proportion of time) during day, night and crepuscular hours and the chi square test results for each dyad modeled. For dyads with too few detections, the chi square value could not be detected. .................................................... 39 Table 9. Varible used to model Large Indian Civet/Common Palm Civet, Leopard Cat/Common Palm Civet, Leopard Cat/Large Indian Civet, Leopard/Leopard Cat and Small Indian Civet/Small Asian Mongoose interactions. Occupancy parameter estimates Phi, Psi A and Psi B are listed with the three different variables used. ............................ 42 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Figure 1. Each species observed was presented with four treatments and the mean behavioral response (per 15 mins) of neutral behaviors for each treatment is depicted above with standard error. ................................................................................................. 14 Figure 2. Each species observed was presented with four treatments and the mean behavioral response (per 15 minutes) of investigative behaviors for each treatment is depicted above with standard error. .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Disastrous Impacts of Trump's Border Wall on Wildlife
    a Wall in the Wild The Disastrous Impacts of Trump’s Border Wall on Wildlife Noah Greenwald, Brian Segee, Tierra Curry and Curt Bradley Center for Biological Diversity, May 2017 Saving Life on Earth Executive Summary rump’s border wall will be a deathblow to already endangered animals on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border. This report examines the impacts of construction of that wall on threatened and endangered species along the entirety of the nearly 2,000 miles of the border between the United States and Mexico. TThe wall and concurrent border-enforcement activities are a serious human-rights disaster, but the wall will also have severe impacts on wildlife and the environment, leading to direct and indirect habitat destruction. A wall will block movement of many wildlife species, precluding genetic exchange, population rescue and movement of species in response to climate change. This may very well lead to the extinction of the jaguar, ocelot, cactus ferruginous pygmy owl and other species in the United States. To assess the impacts of the wall on imperiled species, we identified all species protected as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, or under consideration for such protection by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“candidates”), that have ranges near or crossing the border. We also determined whether any of these species have designated “critical habitat” on the border in the United States. Finally, we reviewed available literature on the impacts of the existing border wall. We found that the border wall will have disastrous impacts on our most vulnerable wildlife, including: 93 threatened, endangered and candidate species would potentially be affected by construction of a wall and related infrastructure spanning the entirety of the border, including jaguars, Mexican gray wolves and Quino checkerspot butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • OCELOT CLUB Volume 18, Number 1454 Fleetwood Drive East January - February 1974 Mobile, Alabama 36605 OCELOT CLUB
    Contents: Yukon Lynx Man ....................... Page 3 Pacific Northwest Report. ............ Page 4 Bengals, Bottles & Bleed II...... ....Page 5 Endangered Species Act. .............. Page 7 Readers Write. .......................Page 9 Greater New York Report.. ............Page 10 President's Statement. ............... Page 11 "El Tigre ............................. Page 12 Cougar Country ....................... Page 13 Florida Report ....................... Page 15 I- I LONG ISLAND OCELOT CLUB volume 18, Number 1454 Fleetwood Drive East January - February 1974 Mobile, Alabama 36605 OCELOT CLUB SULTAN, with Dave Salisbury of Cocoa, Florida. Our main interest was to see if it was possible to take a big cat, raise it as a loving pet and train it to perform. We've spent 14 months training Sultan to perform in our own act. Sultan is now four years old and weighs 143 pounds. Dave uses only the reward system to train Sultan and says that with Sultan's love of beef you need only to convey to him what has to be done in order to obtain the reward. Sultan has appeared in Life Magazine and on What's My Line? television show. Look for Sultan in the June or July issue of Playboy where he appears attired in hi-s sleek black coat. His co-star Miss Helen Rooney appears in a necklace. Dave is past President of the Florida Chapter and received a Lotty in 1969 for his work in LIOC. Branch Representatives: A. C. E. C. - Mrs. Ginny Story, 2475 Las Palomas, La Habra Heights, California 90631 CANADA - Mrs. Janet Thomas R.R.1, Box 602, Manotick, Ontario, (613j 692-4095 692-3728 CANADA - WEST- Doug Fletcher, 11431 73rd Ave., Delta, B.C., Canada Coordinator - Evelyn Dyck, 4911 Union St., North Burnaby, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Hose's Civet Diplogale Hosei from Indonesia
    First record of Hose’s Civet Diplogale hosei from Indonesia, and records of other carnivores in the Schwaner Mountains, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Hiromitsu SAMEJIMA1 and Gono SEMIADI2 Abstract One of the least-recorded carnivores in Borneo, Hose’s Civet Diplogale hosei , was filmed twice in a logging concession, the Katingan–Seruyan Block of Sari Bumi Kusuma Corporation, in the Schwaner Mountains, upper Seruyan River catchment, Central Kalimantan. This, the first record of this species in Indonesia, is about 500 km southwest of its previously known distribution (northern Borneo: Sarawak, Sabah and Brunei). Filmed at 325The m a.s.l., IUCN these Red List records of Threatened are below Species the previously known altitudinal range (450–1,800Prionailurus m). This preliminary planiceps survey forPardofelis medium badia and large and Otter mammals, Civet Cynogalerunning 100bennettii camera-traps in 10 plots for one (Bandedyear, identified Civet Hemigalus in this concession derbyanus 17 carnivores, Arctictis including, binturong on Neofelis diardi, three Endangered Pardofe species- lis(Flat-headed marmorata Cat and Sun Bear Helarctos malayanus, Bay Cat . ) and six Vulnerable species , Binturong , Sunda Clouded Leopard , Marbled Cat Keywords Cynogale bennettii, as well, Pardofelis as Hose’s badia Civet), Prionailurus planiceps Catatan: PertamaBorneo, camera-trapping, mengenai Musang Gunung Diplogale hosei di Indonesia, serta, sustainable karnivora forest management lainnya di daerah Pegunungan Schwaner, Kalimantan Tengah Abstrak Diplogale hosei Salah satu jenis karnivora yang jarang dijumpai di Borneo, Musang Gunung, , telah terekam dua kali di daerah- konsesi hutan Blok Katingan–Seruyan- PT. Sari Bumi Kusuma, Pegunungan Schwaner, di sekitar hulu Sungai Seruya, Kalimantan Tengah. Ini merupakan catatan pertama spesies tersebut terdapat di Indonesia, sekitar 500 km dari batas sebaran yang diketa hui saat ini (Sarawak, Sabah, Brunei).
    [Show full text]
  • Photographic Evidence of a Jaguar (Panthera Onca) Killing an Ocelot (Leopardus Pardalis)
    Received: 12 May 2020 | Revised: 14 October 2020 | Accepted: 15 November 2020 DOI: 10.1111/btp.12916 NATURAL HISTORY FIELD NOTES When waterholes get busy, rare interactions thrive: Photographic evidence of a jaguar (Panthera onca) killing an ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) Lucy Perera-Romero1 | Rony Garcia-Anleu2 | Roan Balas McNab2 | Daniel H. Thornton1 1School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA Abstract 2Wildlife Conservation Society – During a camera trap survey conducted in Guatemala in the 2019 dry season, we doc- Guatemala Program, Petén, Guatemala umented a jaguar killing an ocelot at a waterhole with high mammal activity. During Correspondence severe droughts, the probability of aggressive interactions between carnivores might Lucy Perera-Romero, School of the Environment, Washington State increase when fixed, valuable resources such as water cannot be easily partitioned. University, Pullman, WA, 99163, USA. Email: [email protected] KEYWORDS activity overlap, activity patterns, carnivores, interspecific killing, drought, climate change, Funding information Maya forest, Guatemala Coypu Foundation; Rufford Foundation Associate Editor: Eleanor Slade Handling Editor: Kim McConkey 1 | INTRODUCTION and Johnson 2009). Interspecific killing has been documented in many different pairs of carnivores and is more likely when the larger Interference competition is an important process working to shape species is 2–5.4 times the mass of the victim species, or when the mammalian carnivore communities (Palomares and Caro 1999; larger species is a hypercarnivore (Donadio and Buskirk 2006; de Donadio and Buskirk 2006). Dominance in these interactions is Oliveria and Pereira 2014). Carnivores may reduce the likelihood often asymmetric based on body size (Palomares and Caro 1999; de of these types of encounters through the partitioning of habitat or Oliviera and Pereira 2014), and the threat of intraguild strife from temporal activity.
    [Show full text]
  • • Thailand 18 – 30 November 2013 Phil Telfer +
    x Thailand 18th ʹ 30th November 2013 Phil Telfer + Mark Bibby. A quick summary of a twelve day search for mammals in North and Central Thailand guided by Rattapon Kaichid ( known as Tu ) who together with his wife Jan runs Nature Focus Thailand, they can be very highly recommended. Many thanks to Jon Hall for their email contact which is [email protected] Tu is a really nice guy to ƚƌĂǀĞůǁŝƚŚ͕ŚĞ͛ƐĂŶĞdžĐĞůůĞŶƚĂůů-round wildlife guide and his connections help smooth the way in many of the national parks. Based on our target species, Tu and Jan put together the following itinerary: x Three days ʹ Huai Kha Khaeng wildlife sanctuary x Three days - Khao Yai national park x Four days ʹ Kaeng Krachan national park x One day ʹ Salt pans for Spoon-billed sandpiper x One day ʹ Ban Tha Kham bay for Irawaddy dolphin and Finless porpoise This was quite easy going, giving us a fair bit of time in each of the main centres. I think we did very well scoring 43 species with good views of most of these although we had no luck with any of the mega mammals such as Clouded leopard, Marbled cat, Golden cat or Sun bear which are all possibles and seen from time to time. A couple of weeks before our visit a group had seen a Golden cat catching a dove in front of one of the bird blinds. A Sun bear had been seen crossing the road one morning near the top of the mountain at Kaeng Krachan and a group that arrived there at the same time as us went on to see a Binturong an hour or so later.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illegal Exploitation of the Javan Leopard (
    Nature Conservation 43: 25–39 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.43.59399 RESEARCH ARticlE https://natureconservation.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation The illegal exploitation of the Javan Leopard (Panthera pardus melas) and Sunda Clouded Leopard (Neofelis diardi) in Indonesia Lalita Gomez1,2, Chris R. Shepherd1 1 Monitor Conservation Research Society, Big Lake, Canada 2 Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK Corresponding author: Chris R. Shepherd ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Auliya | Received 6 October 2020 | Accepted 15 January 2021 | Published 22 March 2021 http://zoobank.org/17D9AAB6-8A94-4B5A-932F-6633FAD5D42B Citation: Gomez L, Shepherd CR (2021) The illegal exploitation of the Javan Leopard (Panthera pardus melas) and Sunda Clouded Leopard (Neofelis diardi) in Indonesia. Nature Conservation 43: 25–39. https://doi.org/10.3897/ natureconservation.43.59399 Abstract Indonesia is home to the Javan Leopard (Panthera pardus melas) and the Sunda Clouded Leopard (Neofelis diardi), both of which are threatened by habitat loss, human-wildlife conflict issues and the illegal wildlife trade. Leopards and clouded leopards are threatened by the illegal wildlife trade across their range, how- ever, very little is known of the illegal trade in these two species in Indonesia, or of the efforts made to tackle this crime. Both the Javan Leopard and Sunda Clouded Leopard are protected species in Indonesia and both species are listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), meaning commercial international trade is generally prohibited. To better understand the trade, and efforts to end this trade, we collected records of seizures and prosecutions relating to Javan Leopards and Sunda Clouded Leopards in Indonesia for the period 2011–2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clouded Leopard in Malaysian Borneo
    The clouded leopard in Malaysian Borneo Alan Rabinowitz, Patrick Andau and Paul P. K. Chai The clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa has already disappeared from part of its range in southern Asia; it is classified as vulnerable by IUCN and is on Appendix I of CITES. Little is known about this secretive forest-dweller anywhere in its range, and the sparse information needs to be augmented so that effective conservation measures may be taken if necessary. In early 1986 the senior author travelled through the interior of Malaysian Borneo, staying at villages and timber camps, to assess the status of the species in the region and to find out more about its behaviour. Clouded leopard in captivity in Thailand (Alan Rabinowitz). Clouded leopard in Malaysian Borneo 107 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 29 Sep 2021 at 10:57:47, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300026648 The clouded leopard is one of the most elusive of the larger felids in Asian forests. With body characteristics that fall between those of large and small cats, it has upper canines that are relatively longer than in any other living felid (Guggisberg, 1975). These tusk-like canines have a sharp posterior edge, which caused Sterndale (1884) to compare the clouded leopard to the extinct sabre-toothed tiger. Occurring over an extensive area of southern Asia, the clouded leopard is the largest wild felid on the island of Borneo. Due to its secretive and solitary habits, however, this cat is seldom observed, and much of the knowledge con- cerning its ecology remains anecdotal.
    [Show full text]
  • PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3)
    PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3) Investigation of Pallas’s cat activity patterns and temporal interactions with sympatric species Authors: Katarzyna Ruta, Gustaf Samelius, David Barclay, Emma Nygren PICA - “Conservation of the Pallas’s cat through capacity building, research, and global planning” 1. Introduction: 1.1 Activity patterns of wild felids: Activity patterns form a part of species’ adaptation to their environment (Beltran & Delibes, 1994) and are therefore a fundamental aspect of animal behaviour (Nielsen, 1983; Weller & Bennett, 2001). Felids are generally considered to be crepuscular and nocturnal in their activity (Kitchener, 1991), although they are well adapted to function in a wide range of light conditions (Sunquist & Sunquist, 2002). Numerous abiotic pressures and biotic interactions are known to shape the temporal behaviour of (cat-like) carnivores (Marinho et al., 2018), including changes in temperature (Beltran & Delibes, 1994; Podolski et al., 2013), light (Huck et al., 2017; Heurich et al., 2014) and season (Podolski et al., 2013; Manfredi et al., 2011), sex and reproductive status of the animal (Kolbe & Squires, 2007; Schmidt, 1999; Schmidt et al., 2009), predation risk (Caro, 2005; Farías et al., 2012) and human disturbance (Wolf & Ale, 2009; Ale & Brown, 2009). Owing to the dietary constraints of carnivores whose preys have their own well-defined circadian rhythms (Halle, 2000; Zielinski, 2000), the availability and vulnerability of prey is, however, considered as one of the main influences on predator temporal activity (Zielinski, 1988; Lodé, 1995). According to Optimal Foraging Theory, predators are expected to synchronize their daily activity with the activity of their most profitable prey, increasing the probability of encounters while reducing energy expenditure (MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Monterroso et al., 2013; Emmons, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Asiatic Golden Cat in Thailand Population & Habitat Viability Assessment
    Asiatic Golden Cat in Thailand Population & Habitat Viability Assessment Chonburi, Thailand 5 - 7 September 2005 FINAL REPORT Photos courtesy of Ron Tilson, Sumatran Tiger Conservation Program (golden cat) and Kathy Traylor-Holzer, CBSG (habitat). A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. Traylor-Holzer, K., D. Reed, L. Tumbelaka, N. Andayani, C. Yeong, D. Ngoprasert, and P. Duengkae (eds.). 2005. Asiatic Golden Cat in Thailand Population and Habitat Viability Assessment: Final Report. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, MN. IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © Copyright CBSG 2005 Additional copies of Asiatic Golden Cat of Thailand Population and Habitat Viability Assessment can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124, USA (www.cbsg.org). The CBSG Conservation Council These generous contributors make the work of CBSG possible Providers $50,000 and above Paignton Zoo Emporia Zoo Parco Natura Viva - Italy Laurie Bingaman Lackey Chicago Zoological Society Perth Zoo Lee Richardson Zoo -Chairman Sponsor Philadelphia Zoo Montgomery Zoo SeaWorld, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Leopards Far West As Afghanistan and North to Siberian Russia
    Current distribution and status What is being done? The most cosmopolitan species of wild cat, the leopard (Panthera pardus) inhabits WWF, the International Snow Leopard Trust (ISLT), and other groups are a wide variety of environments from the southern tip of east Africa to the Sea of pursuing a variety of strategies to help ensure the survival of these magnificent Japan. In Asia, the leopard is declining throughout most of its range, especially in cats. Among them are: Bangladesh and the mountains of northern Pakistan. Several Asiatic subspecies • Monitoring illegal trade in cat bones and other body parts of leopard are listed as endangered or critically endangered by the IUCN, and the TRAFFIC has been gathering information on illegal killings and trade in Asia’s challenges involved in their conservation are as various as the subspecies big cats in an attempt to better understand the motivations behind these themselves. killings and the changing dynamics of the trade – such as the re-emergence The snow leopard (Uncia uncia) is found in the high, arid mountains of central of demand for spotted cat pelts. This will enable the development of Asia, with the largest percentage of the species’ habitat occurring in China, strategies to reduce and eliminate the killings and the demand. especially the Tibet region. Known to live in 12 countries, snow leopards range as • Encouraging coexistence of people and cats Asian leopards far west as Afghanistan and north to Siberian Russia. The distribution of the ISLT works closely with local people in snow leopard range countries to find species is becoming more fragmented, as human pressure leads to localised solutions that enable people to pursue their traditional livelihoods in the extinctions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fun Facts: • Ocelot Ankles Rotate to Climb Down Head First • Tail Is Half
    Fun Facts: • Ocelot ankles rotate to climb down head first • Tail is half the length of the body, which is very long! • They have two types of teeth: pointed teeth or biting and blade- like teeth for tearing food. They do not have molars like us to chew food so they have to swallow the chunks • They are cats, so they have a rough tongue. Theirs are a bit rougher than your average housecat though. This is so they can lick bones clean of all the meat • They use their sense of sight and hearing to capture prey as they operate at night time • They are on the smaller side in cat world – only about 2x the size of an average house cat (or the same size as my very very large housecat! Ha! - so larger cats like pumas will eat them along with anacondas and birds of prey like eagles) • So sleek and sneaky! Ocelots are awake at night, but primarily dusk and dawn and are very secretive. They can survive in a vast terrain, but need something with vegetation cover with lots of places to hide. • Able to catch prey in trees and on the ground • Ocelots prey mainly on small rodents, but are also known to eat birds, snakes, iguanas and other lizards, baby peccaries, young deer, rabbits, and even fish and crabs • If they have a pet cat, that would be a good thing to compare to the Ocelot. What is the same? / What is different? Do they notice the whiskers, paws, or the way the cat moves as similarities? • Ocelots have similar body language as housecats.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Cats’ Position Statement, Hybrid Cats Dated January 2010
    NEWS & VIEWS AAFP Position Statement This Position Statement by the AAFP supersedes the AAFP’s earlier ‘Hybrid cats’ Position Statement, Hybrid cats dated January 2010. The American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP) strongly opposes the breeding of non-domestic cats to domestic cats and discourages ownership of early generation hybrid cats, due to concerns for public safety and animal welfare issues. Unnatural breeding between intended mates can make The AAFP strongly opposes breeding difficult. the unnatural breeding of non- Domestic cats have 38 domestic to domestic cats. This chromosomes, and most commonly includes both natural breeding bred non-domestic cats have 36 and artificial insemination. chromosomes. This chromosomal The AAFP opposes the discrepancy leads to difficulties unlicensed ownership of non- in producing live births. Gestation domestic cats (see AAFP’s periods often differ, so those ‘Ownership of non-domestic felids’ kittens may be born premature statement at catvets.com). The and undersized, if they even AAFP recognizes that the offspring survive. A domestic cat foster of cats bred between domestic mother is sometimes required cats and non-domestic (wild) cats to rear hybrid kittens because are gaining in popularity due to wild females may reject premature their novelty and beauty. or undersized kittens. Early There are two commonly seen generation males are usually hybrid cats. The Bengal (Figure 1), sterile, as are some females. with its spotted coat, is perhaps The first generation (F1) female the most popular hybrid, having its offspring of a domestic cat bred to origins in the 1960s. The Bengal a wild cat must then be mated back is a cross between the domestic to a domestic male (producing F2), cat and the Asian Leopard Cat.
    [Show full text]