DOCSLIB.ORG

Albert Shih ASSOCIATE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Albert Shih ASSOCIATE Albert Shih ASSOCIATE Litigation Palo Alto [email protected] 650-849-3022 FOCUS AREAS EXPERIENCE Albert Shih is an associate in the Palo Alto office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Litigation where his practice focuses on intellectual property litigation and counseling. He has litigated Patent Litigation more than 25 patent cases before federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, and Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, including a $31 million judgment obtained for his client in the field of telecommunication protocol. He also regularly advises clients on company intellectual property strategy, technology transactions, licensing negotiation, FRAND-rate setting for standard-essential patents, and patent prosecution matters. Prior to law school, Albert was a design engineer at Intel, where he taught courses at Intel University on chipset design. His field experience and knowledge allow him to understand and appreciate the unique business and technical perspective associated with leaders and innovators in the field of mobile telecommunication protocol, baseband processor, liquid crystal display, semiconductor fabrication, digital signal processors, digital receivers and tuners, image sensors, Internet security software, and various digital and analog circuit designs. Educated in Taiwan and Singapore in his early years, Albert is fluent in Mandarin Chinese. CREDENTIALS Education J.D., Loyola Law School, Los Angeles B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Associations and Memberships Member, American Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section Member, American Intellectual Property Law Association Member, Asia Pacific Intellectual Property Association Member, International Trade Commission Trial Lawyer Association Honors Named to the 2015-2018 editions of the "Rising Stars" list published by Northern California Super Lawyers Admissions State Bar of California U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Copyright © 2021 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved. MATTERS Notable Matters Epistar Corporation v. Lowes Companies, Inc. (C.D. California). Represented plaintiff Epistar Corporation against Lowe's Companies in a five-patent case relating to LED designs. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (N.D. California and D. Delaware). Represented defendant OmniVision Technologies against Godo Kaisha IP Bridge in a 10-patent case relating to image sensors. LG.Philips LCD Co. Ltd. v. AU Optronics (D. Delaware). Represented counterclaim plaintiff AU Optronics against competitor LG Display in a 13-patent case relating to the design of LCD panels. Collabo Innovations, Inc. v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (D. Delaware). Represented defendant OmniVision Technologies against Collabo Innovations in a five-patent case relating to image sensors. MaxLinear v. Silicon Labs (S.D. California). Represented declaratory plaintiff MaxLinear in a 20-patent competitor case against Silicon Labs. Silicon Labs asserted that MaxLinear hybrid TV tuners infringed numerous Silicon Labs patents. Panavision v. Omnivision (C.D. California). Represented defendant Omnivision in a competitor patent case. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. v. Yuneec International Co., Ltd. (C.D. California). Represented plaintiff DJI in a competitor patent case. Bandspeed, Inc. v. MediaTek USA, Inc. (W.D. Texas). Represented defendant MediaTek against plaintiff Bandspeed in a patent case relating to communication protocol. Advanced Display Technologies v. HTC (E.D. Texas). Represented defendant HTC against plaintiff Advanced Display Technologies in a patent case relating to the design of LCD panels. Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al. (E.D. Texas). Represented defendant AU Optronics Corporation in a patent case relating to the design of LCD panels. Sampo IP, LLC v. Salesforce.COM, Inc. (E.D. Virginia). Represented defendant Salesforce in a patent case relating to Internet communications. Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. HTC Corporation. Represented defendant HTC in a patent case relating to software compilers. Raytheon Company v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (E.D. Texas). Represented defendant OmniVision in a patent case relating to manufacturing techniques. Multiplayer Network Innovations, LLC v. Tencent Holdings Limited, and Tencent America LLC (E.D. Texas). Represented defendant Tencent in a patent case relating to game systems. Sasken Communication Technologies Limited vs. Spreadtrum Communications Inc. et al. (JAMS). Represented plaintiff Sasken Communication Technologies in an arbitration against Spreadtrum Communications. In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Including Monitors, Televisions, and Modules, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-749). Represented respondent AU Optronics in a patent case relating to liquid crystal displays. In the Matter of Certain Flat Panel Display Devices, and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-793). Represented complainant AU Optronics in a patent case relating to liquid crystal displays. In the Matter of Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof (ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-800). Represented complainant InterDigital in a patent case relating to telecommunication protocol. In the Matter of Certain Devices with Secure Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-858). Represented complainant InterDigital in a patent case relating to telecommunication protocol. CLIENTS Select Clients AU Optronics InterDigital Cyntec Technology Marvell Semiconductor DJI MaxLinear Epistar Corporation MediaTek HTC OmniVision Technologies Salesforce.com Copyright © 2021 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved. Tencent INSIGHTS Select Publications "Diminishing Claim Vitiation Limitation to the Doctrine of Equivalents," Law Journal Newsletters: The Intellectual Property Strategist, May 2013 "Netlist Verification - A Static Approach to Timing Verification," Intel Design Test and Technology Conference, May 2004 Select Speaking Engagements “Damage Exposure/Risk for Non-U.S. Business Activities,” Wilson Sonsini Podcast, October 2020 "The Challenges Of Enforcing And Defending Patents In The United States," 2018 Developments in Patent Practice in the United States and Taiwan, and its Impact to Your Patent Strategy, Taipei, Taiwan, November 27, 2018 "Generating Leverage and Momentum for the Enforcement and Monetization of Your Company's Patent Program," 2016 Developments in Patent Practice in the United States and Taiwan, and its Impact to Your Patent Strategy, Taipei, Taiwan, November 30, 2016 "Best Practices for ITC Investigations," Symposium on Intellectual Property Crimes and Combating Counterfeiting for People's Republic of China Ministry of Commerce, Los Angeles, California, February 3, 2015 Host, 2011 Symposium on Patent Litigation and Antitrust Issues for Taiwanese Technology Companies, Hsinchu, Taiwan, September 6, 2011 Copyright © 2021 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. All Rights Reserved..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 STIPULATED ADDENDUM to the PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NUMBERS 18-CV-01885-HSG; 18-CV-01886-HSG; 18-CV-01887-HSG [All Counsel Listed
    Case 4:18-cv-01887-HSG Document 303 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 9 1 [All counsel listed on signature page] 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OAKLAND DIVISION 4 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., 5 U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, Case No. 4:18-cv-01885-HSG (and related cases) 6 Plaintiffs, v. STIPULATED ADDENDUM TO 7 THE PROTECTIVE ORDER; ACER INC., ORDER 8 ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, 9 Defendants. 10 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 11 Intervenor-Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, 14 Intervenor-Defendants. 15 16 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, 17 Intervenor- 18 Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs in Intervention 19 v. 20 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 21 Intervenor- Plaintiff/Counterclaim 22 Defendant in Intervention 23 AND 24 MICROSOFT MOBILE INC. 25 Counterclaim Defendant in Intervention 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED ADDENDUM TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NUMBERS 18-CV-01885-HSG; 18-CV-01886-HSG; 18-CV-01887-HSG Case 4:18-cv-01887-HSG Document 303 Filed 09/11/18 Page 2 of 9 1 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., 2 U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, Related Case No. 4:18-cv-01886-HSG 3 Plaintiffs, v. 4 ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., 5 ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, 6 Defendants. 7 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 8 Intervenor-Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, 11 Intervenor-Defendants. 12 13 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, 14 Intervenor- 15 Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs in Intervention 16 v. 17 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 18 Intervenor- Plaintiff/Counterclaim 19 Defendant in Intervention 20 AND 21 MICROSOFT MOBILE INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Bluetooth Low Energy Software Release Notes
    BLUEGIGA BLUETOOTH LOW ENERGY SOFTWARE RELEASE NOTES Wednesday, 2 December 2020 Version 6.1 Table of Contents 1 Changes: 1.10.0 (Build 153) compared to 1.9.0 (Build 150) ______________________________________ 4 2 Changes: 1.9.0 (Build 150) compared to 1.8.0 (Build 143) _______________________________________ 5 3 Changes: 1.8.0 (Build 143) compared to 1.7.0 (Build 142) _______________________________________ 6 4 Changes: 1.7.0 (Build 142) compared to 1.6.0 (Build 140) _______________________________________ 7 5 Changes: 1.6.0 (Build 140) compared to 1.5.0 (Build 137) _______________________________________ 8 6 Changes: 1.5.0 (Build 137) compared to 1.4.2 (Build 130) _______________________________________ 9 7 Changes: 1.4.2 (Build 130) compared to 1.4.1 (Build 128) ______________________________________ 10 8 Changes: 1.4.1 (Build 128) compared to 1.4.0 (Build 127) ______________________________________ 11 9 Changes: 1.4.0 (Build 127) compared to 1.3.2 (Build 122) ______________________________________ 12 10 Changes: 1.3.2 (Build 122) compared to 1.3.1 (Build 119) _____________________________________ 13 11 Changes: 1.3.1 (Build 119) compared to 1.3.1 (Build 118) _____________________________________ 14 12 Changes: 1.3.1 (Build 118) compared to 1.3.0 Beta (Build 110) _________________________________ 15 13 Changes: 1.3.0 Beta (Build 110) compared to 1.2.2 (Build 100) _________________________________ 16 14 Changes: 1.2.2 (Build 100) compared to 1.2.1 (Build 91) ______________________________________ 17 15 Changes: 1.2.1 (Build 91) compared
    [Show full text]
  • Android (Operating System) 1 Android (Operating System)
    Android (operating system) 1 Android (operating system) Android Home screen displayed by Samsung Nexus S with Google running Android 2.3 "Gingerbread" Company / developer Google Inc., Open Handset Alliance [1] Programmed in C (core), C++ (some third-party libraries), Java (UI) Working state Current [2] Source model Free and open source software (3.0 is currently in closed development) Initial release 21 October 2008 Latest stable release Tablets: [3] 3.0.1 (Honeycomb) Phones: [3] 2.3.3 (Gingerbread) / 24 February 2011 [4] Supported platforms ARM, MIPS, Power, x86 Kernel type Monolithic, modified Linux kernel Default user interface Graphical [5] License Apache 2.0, Linux kernel patches are under GPL v2 Official website [www.android.com www.android.com] Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and key applications.[6] [7] Google Inc. purchased the initial developer of the software, Android Inc., in 2005.[8] Android's mobile operating system is based on a modified version of the Linux kernel. Google and other members of the Open Handset Alliance collaborated on Android's development and release.[9] [10] The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) is tasked with the maintenance and further development of Android.[11] The Android operating system is the world's best-selling Smartphone platform.[12] [13] Android has a large community of developers writing applications ("apps") that extend the functionality of the devices. There are currently over 150,000 apps available for Android.[14] [15] Android Market is the online app store run by Google, though apps can also be downloaded from third-party sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Smartphones and Tablets with Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 2.0 Technology
    Select smartphones and tablets with Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 2.0 technology + Asus Transformer T100 + Samsung Galaxy S6 + Asus Zenfone 2 + Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge + Droid Turbo by Motorola + Samsung Note 4 + Fujitsu Arrows NX + Samsung Note Edge + Fujitsu F-02G + Sharp Aquos Pad + Fujitsu F-03G + Sharp Aquos Zeta + Fujitsu F-05F + Sharp SH01G/02G + Google Nexus 6 + Sony Xperia Z2 (Japan) + HTC Butterfly 2 + Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet (Japan) + HTC One (M8) + Sony Xperia Z3 + HTC One (M9) + Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet + Kyocera Urbano L03 + Sony Xperia Z4 + LeTV One Max + Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet + LeTV One Pro + Xiaomi Mi 3 + LG G Flex 2 + Xiaomi Mi 4 + LG G4 + Xiaomi Mi Note + New Moto X by Motorola + Xiaomi Mi Note Pro + Panasonic CM-1 + Yota Phone 2 + Samsung Galaxy S5 (Japan) These devices contain the hardware necessary to achieve Quick Charge 2.0. It is at the device manufacturer’s discretion to fully enable this feature. A Quick Charge 2.0 certified power adapter is required. Different Quick Charge 2.0 implementations may result in different charging times. www.qualcomm.com/quickcharge Qualcomm Quick Charge is a product of Qualcom Technologies, Inc. Updated 6/2015 Certified Accessories + Air-J Multi Voltage AC Charger + Motorola TurboPower 15 Wall Charger + APE Technology AC/DC Adapter + Naztech N210 Travel Charger + APE Technology Car Charger + Naztech Phantom Vehicle Charger + APE Technology Power Bank + NTT DOCOMO AC Adapter + Aukey PA-U28 Turbo USB Universal Wall Charger + Power Partners AC Adapter + CellTrend Car Charger + Powermod Car Charger
    [Show full text]
  • TS10: Ember Em35x NCP Host (STM32)
    TS10 ® EMBER EM35X NCP HOST (STM32) MODULE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION When combined with an Ember EM35x NCP Breakout Board, the Ember STM32 NCP Host Module offers a complete ZigBee wireless solution for development and deployment of a low-data-rate, low-power ZigBee application. The STM32 microprocessor is part of the two-layer (FR4-based) host module that connects to the EM35x NCP Breakout Board through the board-to-board connectors. This document provides the technical specification for the STM32 EM35x NCP Host Module. It describes the board- level interfaces as well as the key performance parameters. In addition, it provides the necessary information for developer to validate their application designs using the STM32 EM35x NCP Host Module. New in This Revision Document renumbering. Contents 1 STM32 Host Module Features ......................................................................................................................... 2 2 Components ................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 STM32 Microcontroller ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 EM35x NCP Breakout Board interface connector (J1-J2) .......................................................................... 4 2.3 JTAG Programming and Debug Connector (J3)........................................................................................ 6 2.4 Unused STM32 GPIO
    [Show full text]
  • PAEW-0059 Korea Semiconductor Industry Association
    Comments of the Korea Semiconductor Industry Association On Patent Assertion Entity (PAE) Activities April 5, 2013 The Korea Semiconductor Industry Association (KSIA) welcomes the opportunity to submit these comments to the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, regarding the activities of Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs). The KSIA hopes that these comments are helpful to the agencies’ analysis of this important issue and respectfully requests that these comments be taken into account as policies are developed to address these serious concerns. The KSIA is an industry association, based in Seoul, Korea, which represents more than 300 companies in the semiconductor manufacturing sector, involved in all aspects of semiconductor device manufacturing as well as semiconductor equipment, materials, and design. Many of its member companies are world leaders in developing advanced semiconductor technologies. The KSIA's primary objectives include promotion of its members’ products and the further advancement of technological development in Korea's semiconductor industry. The KSIA is dedicated to providing opportunities for promoting cooperation among its members and members of international organizations in the areas of device, equipment and material suppliers. The world’s semiconductor industry, of which KSIA members are an important part, plays a vital role in the technological advancement and increased efficiency of nearly every facet of society. In addition to the well-known advances in computers,
    [Show full text]
  • AN669: Integrating Silicon Labs Sim3xxxx Devices Into the Keil Μvision®
    AN669 INTEGRATING SILICON LABS SiM3XXXX DEVICES INTO THE KEIL µVISION® IDE 1. Introduction This application note describes how to configure and use the Keil µVision® Integrated Development Environment (IDE) with Silicon Laboratories Precision32™ 32-bit microcontrollers (SiM3xxxx). 2. Key Points Key points described in this application note include: Generating a blank project in Keil µVision Configuring a µVision project for use with Silicon Laboratories SiM3xxxx devices Using the µVision IDE to build, download, run, and debug a project Using the System Viewer Windows and Debug (Print) Viewer 3. Creating a Project A project is necessary in order to build an example and download the firmware image to the MCU. To create a project in µVision: 1. Under the Project menu, select New µVision Project. After naming your new project, select SiLabs SiM3x Devices in the Select a CPU Data Base File dialog and click OK. 2. Expand the Silicon Laboratories data base to open a list of supported MCUs, select the appropriate MCU, and click OK. Figure 1. Selecting a SiM3x Device After creating your blank project, there will be an empty project in the Project Window. The next step is to configure the project options. Rev. 0.1 2/12 Copyright © 2012 by Silicon Laboratories AN669 AN669 4. Configuring Options for Target Specific configurations are required in order to communicate with the MCU using µVision. Some of the options are preconfigured after selecting a device under the Device tab, but some modifications are required. This section describes the required settings in all of the configuration tabs within the ProjectOptions for Target dialog; tabs that do not require any changes are explicitly noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Si106x Development Kits User's Guide
    Si106x-DK Si106X DEVELOPMENT KITS USER’S GUIDE 1. Kits Overview This user's guide describes the development kits of the Si106x Wireless MCU family. The latest version of this user guide is available online at http://www.silabs.com/products/wireless/wirelessmcu/Pages/default.aspx. Each kit contains two RF nodes based on the Wireless Motherboard to support evaluation and development of sub-GHz RF links with the different Wireless MCUs. WMCU pico board content of the different kits is listed in Table 1, and content common to all the kits is listed in Table 2. Table 1. WMCU Pico Boards of the Si106x Development Kits Qty Description Part Number Si1060 490 MHz Wireless MCU Development Kit 1060-490-DK 2 Si1060 490 MHz PICO Board 1060-PCE20C490 Si1060 915 MHz Wireless MCU Development Kit 1060-915-DK 2 Si1060 915 MHz PICO Board 1060-PCE20C915 Si1062 868 MHz Wireless MCU Development Kit 1062-868-DK 2 Si1062 868 MHz PICO Board 1062-PCE13D868 Si1064 434 MHz Wireless MCU Development Kit 1064-434-DK 2 Si1064 434 MHz PICO Board 1064-PCE10D434 Si1064 868 MHz Wireless MCU Development Kit 1064-868-DK 2 Si1064 868 MHz PICO Board 1064-PCE10D868 Si1064 915 MHz Wireless MCU Development Kit 1064-915-DK 2 Si1064 915 MHz PICO Board 1064-PCE10D915 Table 2. Common Kit Content Qty Description Part Number 2 Wireless Motherboard MSC-WMB912 2 USB cable (USBA-USB mini) 2 Antenna with SMA connection MSC-AT50-XXX 4 AA Battery 1 Si106x Development Kit User’s Guide Rev. 0.4 12/17 Copyright © 2017 by Silicon Laboratories Si106x-DK Si106x-DK 2.
    [Show full text]
  • SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 3:14-Cv-582-JD
    Case 3:14-cv-00582-JD Document 51 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 19 1 EDUARDO G. ROY (Bar No. 146316) DANIEL C. QUINTERO (Bar No. 196492) 2 JOHN R. HURLEY (Bar No. 203641) PROMETHEUS PARTNERS L.L.P. 3 220 Montgomery Street Suite 1094 San Francisco, CA 94104 4 Telephone: 415.527.0255 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 DANIEL NORCIA 7 UNITED STATES DISTIRCT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL NORCIA, on his own behalf and on Case No.: 3:14-cv-582-JD 10 behalf of all others similarly situated, SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION 11 Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT FOR: 12 v. 1. VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CONSUMERS LEGAL REMEDIES 13 SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT, CIVIL CODE §1750, et seq. AMERICA, LLC, a New York Corporation, and 2. UNLAWFUL AND UNFAIR 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., BUSINESS PRACTICES, a New Jersey Corporation, CALIFORNIA BUS. & PROF. CODE 15 §17200, et seq. Defendants. 3. FALSE ADVERTISING, 16 CALIFORNIA BUS. & PROF. CODE §17500, et seq. 17 4. FRAUD 18 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 3:14-cv-582-JD Case 3:14-cv-00582-JD Document 51 Filed 11/10/14 Page 2 of 19 1 Plaintiff DANIEL NORCIA, having not previously amended as a matter of course pursuant to 2 Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(B), hereby exercises that right by amending within 21 days of service of 3 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss filed October 20, 2014 (ECF 45). 4 Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Daniel Norcia complains and alleges, 5 by and through his attorneys, upon personal knowledge and information and belief, as follows: 6 NATURE OF THE ACTION 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division
    Case 7:14-cv-00014-O Document 284 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 16355 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION § SUMMIT 6 LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § HTC CORPORATION et. al, § Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O § Defendants. § § § SUMMIT 6 LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00106-O v. § § APPLE INC. § § Defendant. § § ORDER Before the Court are Defendants Apple Inc. (“Apple”), Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”)1, Motorola Mobility, LLC (“Motorola”), and HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.’s (“HTC”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Brief and Appendix in Support (ECF Nos. 263–64), filed March 16, 2015; Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 271), filed April 6, 2015; and Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 275), filed April 20, 2015; and Defendants’ Motion for a Hearing (ECF No. 278), filed May 1, 2015. Having considered the motion, related briefing, pleadings, and applicable law, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings should be 1 The Court has since dismissed all claims against Defendant Twitter per the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (ECF No. 283), filed May 21, 2015. Case 7:14-cv-00014-O Document 284 Filed 05/28/15 Page 2 of 15 PageID 16356 and is hereby DENIED. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for a Hearing is DENIED as moot. I. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2014, Summit 6 filed this patent infringement lawsuit alleging infringement against application developer Twitter and four mobile device manufacturers and their affiliates, namely, Apple, HTC, Motorola, and LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Representative Legal Matters Mark W.C
    Representative Legal Matters Mark W.C. Tu Represented KKR in relation to its proposed buyout of Yageo Corporation. Represented Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc. in its acquisition of 100 percent shares of PowerASE Technology by way of tender offer and merger. Represented Morgan Stanley, the financial advisor to Polaris Securities Corporation, in relation to its share swap with Yuanta Financial Holding Company. Represented MediaTek Inc. for acquisition of 100 percent of outstanding shares of Ralink Technology Corporation by way of a share swap. Represented Chimei Optoelectronics Corporation in relation to its merger with Innolux Corporation. Represented Morgan Stanley, the financial advisor to Taiwan International Securities Corporation (TISC), in relation to the sale of all issued and outstanding shares of TISC to Capital Securities Corporation by way of a tender offer followed by a merger. Represented E.Sun Commercial Bank in its general business and asset assumption from Chu Nan Co-operative Credit Association. Represented Prime View International Co., Ltd. in relation to its acquisition of E. Ink Corporation by way of a share exchange. Represented Morgan Stanley Private Equity in its acquisition of a stake in CTCI Corporation. Representing WIN Semiconductors Corporation in relation to its issuance of global depositary receipts. Represented E.Sun Financial Holding Company. in relation to its issuance of global depositary receipts. Represented Cathay Financial Holding Company in relation to its issuance of European convertible bonds. Represented Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. in relation to its Form 20-F filing submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Represented Pegatron Corporation in relation to its issuance of European convertible bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan's Top 50 Corporates
    Title Page 1 TAIWAN RATINGS CORP. | TAIWAN'S TOP 50 CORPORATES We provide: A variety of Chinese and English rating credit Our address: https://rrs.taiwanratings.com.tw rating information. Real-time credit rating news. Credit rating results and credit reports on rated corporations and financial institutions. Commentaries and house views on various industrial sectors. Rating definitions and criteria. Rating performance and default information. S&P commentaries on the Greater China region. Multi-media broadcast services. Topics and content from Investor outreach meetings. RRS contains comprehensive research and analysis on both local and international corporations as well as the markets in which they operate. The site has significant reference value for market practitioners and academic institutions who wish to have an insight on the default probability of Taiwanese corporations. (as of June 30, 2015) Chinese English Rating News 3,440 3,406 Rating Reports 2,006 2,145 TRC Local Analysis 462 458 S&P Greater China Region Analysis 76 77 Contact Us Iris Chu; (886) 2 8722-5870; [email protected] TAIWAN RATINGS CORP. | TAIWAN'S TOP 50 CORPORATESJenny Wu (886) 2 872-5873; [email protected] We warmly welcome you to our latest study of Taiwan's top 50 corporates, covering the island's largest corporations by revenue in 2014. Our survey of Taiwan's top corporates includes an assessment of the 14 industry sectors in which these companies operate, to inform our views on which sectors are most vulnerable to the current global (especially for China) economic environment, as well as the rising strength of China's domestic supply chain.
    [Show full text]