DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructure Delivery Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrastructure Delivery Study Cambridge City Council & South Cambridgeshire District Council Infrastructure Delivery Study Project Ref: a491 Doc Ref: R001/REV04 August 2012 Peter Brett Associates LLP 10 Queen Square Bristol BS1 4NT T: 0117 9281560 F: 0117 9281570 E: [email protected] Infrastructure Delivery Study Final Report We print on 100% recycled paper from sustainable suppliers accredited to ISO 14001. ii Infrastructure Delivery Study Final Report Document Control Sheet Project Name: Infrastructure Delivery Study Project Ref: a491 Doc Ref: R001/REV04 Date: August 2012 Name Position Signature Date Prepared by: Paul Jobson Associate 06/08/2012 Reviewed by: Mark Russell Associate 06/08/2012 Approved by: John Baker Partner 06/08/2012 For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved 01 12/09/2011 First Draft Report PJ SR JB 02 23/10/2011 Second Draft Report PJ MR JB 03 29/05/2012 Final Draft Report PJ MR JB 04 30/07/2012 Final Report (for early release) PJ MR JB 05 06/08/2012 Final Report PJ MR JB Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the Client and generally in accordance with the appropriate ACE Agreement and taking account of the manpower, resources, investigations and testing devoted to it by agreement with the Client. This report is confidential to the Client and Peter Brett Associates LLP accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. © Peter Brett Associates LLP 2012 iii Infrastructure Delivery Study Final Report iv Infrastructure Delivery Study Final Report Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 National Planning Policy Framework ............................................................................. 2 1.3 Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Important Caveats for the Infrastructure Delivery Study ............................................... 4 1.5 Structure of the Report .................................................................................................. 4 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Identify the Existing Infrastructure Needs and Future Infrastructure Requirements for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire to 2031 ......................................................................... 6 3 Planned Provision .................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Emerging/Adopted Development Plan Requirements ................................................. 11 3.3 Main Settlements/Sub Areas ....................................................................................... 12 3.4 Existing Completions and Commitments ..................................................................... 13 3.5 Planned Provision ........................................................................................................ 13 3.6 Phasing ........................................................................................................................ 15 3.7 Infrastructure Categories ............................................................................................. 17 4 Physical Infrastructure ........................................................................................................... 18 4.2 Physical Infrastructure – Transport and Access .......................................................... 18 4.3 Energy Generation, Supply and Distribution ............................................................... 41 4.4 Water Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 46 4.5 Physical Infrastructure - Household Waste and Recycling .......................................... 52 4.6 Physical Infrastructure - Telecommunications ............................................................. 58 5 Social Infrastructure ............................................................................................................... 60 5.2 Education ..................................................................................................................... 60 5.3 Health ........................................................................................................................... 75 5.4 Recreation and Leisure ................................................................................................ 81 5.5 Community and Social ................................................................................................. 88 5.6 Police and Fire Services ............................................................................................ 100 6 Green Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 105 6.2 Informal and formal Green Space, including Children’s Play .................................... 105 6.3 Natural Green Space and Public Rights of Way ........................................................ 109 7 Infrastructure Schedules and Sub Areas Summary ......................................................... 113 7.2 Cambridge Summaries .............................................................................................. 114 7.3 South Cambridgeshire Summaries ............................................................................ 116 7.4 Cross Boundary Urban Extensions Summaries ........................................................ 120 7.5 Both Local Authorities Summary ............................................................................... 121 8 Funding .................................................................................................................................. 122 8.2 Grant and Loan Funding ............................................................................................ 123 8.3 Grant Funding ............................................................................................................ 123 8.4 Loan Funding ............................................................................................................. 127 8.5 Local Sources of Funding .......................................................................................... 129 8.6 Service Providers ....................................................................................................... 132 9 Infrastructure Delivery ......................................................................................................... 134 9.2 Prioritisation ............................................................................................................... 134 9.3 Overall Requirements – Cambridge .......................................................................... 136 9.4 Overall Requirements – South Cambridgeshire ........................................................ 137 9.5 Overall Requirements – Cross Boundary .................................................................. 138 9.6 Overall Requirements – Both Local Authorities ......................................................... 139 9.7 Addressing the Funding Shortfall? ............................................................................. 140 v Infrastructure Delivery Study Final Report Tables Table 1.1: Scope of Infrastructure ........................................................................................................... 2 Table 2.1: Average Household Size 2001 to 2031 .................................................................................. 8 Table 2.2: Dwelling sizes ......................................................................................................................... 8 Table 3.1: Proposed Development 2010-2031 ..................................................................................... 12 Table 3.2: Development Scenarios ....................................................................................................... 14 Table 3.3: Development Phasing .......................................................................................................... 16 Table 3.4: Scope of the Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 17 Table 4.1: Cambridge Park & Ride Capacity......................................................................................... 21 Table 4.2: Distribution of Journey to Work Trips by District and Market Town (2001 Census) ............ 24 Table 4.3: Funded Highways Infrastructure Schemes .......................................................................... 27 Table 4.4: Funded Rail Infrastructure Schemes .................................................................................... 29 Table 4.5: Funded Bus Infrastructure Schemes .................................................................................... 32 Table 4.6: Transport Infrastructure Requirements - Cambridge ........................................................... 38 Table 4.7: Transport
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Complete Issue
    THE JOURNAL of the UNITED REFORMED CHURCH HISTORY SOCIETY (incorporating the Congregational Historical Society, founded 1899, and the Presbyterian Historical Society of England, founded 1913) EDITORS: Revd. Dr. R. BUICK KNOX, M.A., B.D., and Dr. CLYDE BINFIELD, M.A. VOL. 1. No. 9. APRIL 1977 CONTENTS Editorial and Notes 239 Cambridge Nonconformity 1660-1710: from Holcroft to Hussey, by Geoffrey F. Nuttall, M.A., D.D. 241 Saint John of Redenhall: a Unique Tombstone? by J. E. Newport, M.A., B.D., B.Litt. 259 Reviews 263 Editorial We record with gratitude the great service to the Church and to our Society of the Rev. Roy Drummond Whitehorn, M.A., D.D., M.B.E., who died in November 1976. He made his mark as professor and principal in Westminster College, Cambridge, and as a leading figure in the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of England of which he was Moderator in 1950. He was also Moderator of the Free Church Federal Council and was one of the early architects of the United Reformed Church. He was President of the Presbyterian Historical Society and was for a time editor of its Journal. He was unable to take much part in the formation of our Society but it had his full support and good wishes. We record with equal gratitude the service of the Rev. William Gordon Robinson, M.A., Ph.D., who died in February 1977. Gordon Robinson ministered in Gatley and Oldham, but it was as Principal of Lancashire (later Northern) College in Manchester, from 1943 to 1968, that he became most widely known.
    [Show full text]
  • 170605 HECA Progress Report 2019
    Home Energy Conservation Act Progress Report 2019 Fenland District Council Energy Saving Trust – HECA Progress Report – 2019 page 1 of 31 Document information Full Title Responsible author(s): Eva Gonzalez Insight & Analytics Consultant, Energy Saving Trust phone: 020 7654 2434 email: [email protected] Reviewer(s): Andrew Tod Insight & Analytics Manager, Energy Saving Trust phone: 020 7222 0101 email: [email protected] The Energy Saving Trust has taken all reasonable care to ensure that the information contained in this report is full and accurate. However, to the extent permitted by applicable laws, the Energy Saving Trust accepts no liability for any direct, indirect or consequential damages however caused, resulting from reliance on, or any use of the information contained in this report. Energy Saving Trust – HECA Progress Report – 2019 page 2 of 31 Contents 1 Progress to date ............................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summary ................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Introduction to HECA ................................................................................................................. 6 4. Climate Change and CO 2 Emissions ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elaine Knobel-Forbes
    Homefields, May Street, Great Chishill, Royston, Hertfordshire, SG8 8SN. 09 November 2020 Uttlesford District Council Planning Department Council Offices London Road Saffron Walden CB11 4ER Dear Sirs, Planning Application Reference: UTT/20/1798/FUL Proposal: Erection of 1 no. Agricultural Barn Location: Langley Park Farm, Langley Lower Green, Langley CB11 4SB I have been made aware of the proposal to erect a new barn at Langley Park Farm and whilst I have every respect for the necessity of farmers to manage their business, it has been suggested locally that this barn is primarily a storage hub and is grossly disproportionate in size to the land actually owned. There is no information on the application in respect of traffic movements, traffic management or designated routes for vehicles visiting or leaving the location. It is also my understanding that an additional large barn, with planning permission, is already under construction on land adjoining the proposed barn at Langley Park Farm, which will also have high volumes of HGV traffic, particularly during harvest time. The application makes no suggestion of constructing a new access at the junction with Park Lane to accommodate the turning area of large articulated vehicles, by experience, some with trailers. Clearly, the highway at this junction has restricted turning capacity and is not currently constructed in a way to support the aggressive friction between the vehicle tyres and the road. No vehicle tracking has been shown for vehicles entering or exiting the farm. Page 1 of 10 Should the vehicles visiting or leaving Langley Park Farm choose to turn north towards Little Chishill in Cambridgeshire they will need to navigate through very narrow lanes not designed to accommodate such sized vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Poll
    Notice of Poll Election of a County Councillor for Bar Hill Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a County Councillor for Bar Hill will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of County Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors HARFORD 7 Kingfisher Way, The Conservative Party Bunty E Waters (+) John E.F. Houlton (++) Lynda Cottenham, CB24 8XN Candidate MURPHY (Address in Liberal Democrats Corinne M Garvie (+) James R Raven (++) Edna Helen Cambridge) RANKIN 7 Bennys Way, Coton, Green Party Mark J Taylor (+) Paul Anderson (++) Stan CB23 7PS 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Station Ranges of electoral register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote thereat Bar Hill Church, Hanover Close, Bar Hill 1 QA1-1 to QA1-1529 Bar Hill Church, Hanover Close, Bar Hill 2 QA1-1530 to QA1-3068 Dry Drayton Village Hall, 23 High Street, Dry Drayton 3 QC1-1 to QC1-520 Cotton Hall, Cambridge Road, Girton 4 QD1-81 to QD1-1469 Cotton Hall, Cambridge Road, Girton 5 QD1-1704 to QD1-3362 Robinson Hall, Redlands Road, Lolworth 6 NL1-1 to NL1-118 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan This Determination Statement
    24 August 2021 Strategic Environmental Assessment Determination Statement: Draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan This determination statement has been produced by Fenland District Council (FDC) as “responsible authority”, to meet the requirements of Regulation 9 of the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004. This Determination Statement forms a Submission Document for the purposes of neighbourhood planning, as required by The Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) (reg. 15(e)(ii)). A Screening Assessment was undertaken by FDC during the preparation of the draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan. As part of this assessment, FDC consulted the statutory bodies. The SEA Screening Report follows this Determination Statement. The Screening Report examines the strategic policy and environmental context relevant to Whittlesey, and presents the findings of the screening assessment. The report identifies that the draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan does not seek to increase the overall quantum of growth beyond that which has already been permitted through the planning system. Other policies generally accord with the adopted Local Plan, the potential environmental effects of which were duly assessed through the plan-making process. The Screening Report was sent to consultation bodies for comment (13 July to 23 August 2021). Responses were received from Environment Agency, Historic England and Natural England. Through its response to the draft Screening Report consultation, Historic England concurred with the Council that the preparation of a Strategic Environmental Assessment is not required. Natural England confirmed it agrees with the report’s conclusions that the Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan would not be likely to result in a significant effect on any European Site, either alone or in combination and therefore no further assessment work is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted Core Strategy
    Huntingdonshire D I S T R I C T C O U N C I L Local Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted September 2009 Environment and Community Services - Planning www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk.uk Local Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted September 2009 Environment and Community Services - Planning www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk This document can be viewed and downloaded from www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk. Further copies of this document can be obtained from: Head of Planning Services Huntingdonshire District Council Pathfinder House St Mary’s Street Huntingdon PE29 3TN If you require this document in another format or translated into another language please contact a member of the Development Plans section on 01480 388388 or [email protected]. © Huntingdonshire District Council 2009 Contents Huntingdonshire LDF | Core Strategy: Adopted 2009 Foreword i 1 Introduction 1 2 Links with Other Documents 4 3 The Spatial Vision 6 A Spatial Portrait of Huntingdonshire 6 The Planning Context 9 A Spatial Vision for Huntingdonshire 11 Objectives of the Core Strategy 13 4 The Cornerstone of Sustainable Development 15 5 The Spatial Strategy 19 Key Diagram 19 Strategic Housing Development 21 Settlement Hierarchy 24 Addressing Housing Need 26 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 29 Economic Development 30 Retail and Town Centre Uses 33 Areas of Strategic Green Infrastructure Enhancement 35 Infrastructure and Implementation 39 6 Monitoring 45 Appendices 1 Glossary 52 2 Evidence Base & Supporting Documents 58 3 Saved Policies to be Superseded 63 Contents Huntingdonshire LDF | Core Strategy: Adopted 2009 Foreword Huntingdonshire LDF | Core Strategy: Adopted 2009 Foreword The District Council knows that Huntingdonshire is an attractive place where people and communities can thrive and develop in a safe and healthy environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Tydd St
    C D To Long Sutton To Sutton Bridge 55 Cambridgeshire Tydd St. Mary 24 24 50 50 Foul Anchor 55 Tydd Passenger Transport Map 2011 Tydd St. Giles Gote 24 50 Newton 1 55 1 24 50 To Kings Lynn Fitton End 55 To Kings Lynn 46 Gorefield 24 010 LINCOLNSHIRE 63 308.X1 24 WHF To Holbeach Drove 390 24 390 Leverington WHF See separate map WHF WHF for service detail in this area Throckenholt 24 Wisbech Parson 24 390.WHF Drove 24 46 WHF 24 390 Bellamys Bridge 24 46 Wisbech 3 64 To Terrington 390 24. St. Mary A B Elm Emneth E 390 Murrow 3 24 308 010 60 X1 56 64 7 Friday Bridge 65 Thorney 46 380 308 X1 To Grantham X1 NORFOLK and the North 390 308 Outwell 308 Thorney X1 7 Toll Guyhirn Coldham Upwell For details of bus services To in this area see Peterborough City Council Ring’s End 60 Stamford and 7 publicity or call: 01733 747474 60 2 46 3 64 Leicester Eye www.travelchoice.org 010 2 X1 65 390 56 60.64 3.15.24.31.33.46 To 308 7 380 Three Holes Stamford 203.205.206.390.405 33 46 407.415.701.X1.X4 Chainbridge To Downham Market 33 65 65 181 X4 Peterborough 206 701 24 Lot’s Bridge Wansford 308 350 Coates See separate map Iron Bridge To Leicester for service detail Whittlesey 33 701 in this area X4 Eastrea March Christchurch 65 181 206 701 33 24 15 31 46 Tips End 203 65 F Chesterton Hampton 205 Farcet X4 350 9 405 3 31 35 010 Welney 115 To Elton 24 206 X4 407 56 Kings Lynn 430 415 7 56 Gold Hill Haddon 203.205 X8 X4 350.405 Black Horse 24.181 407.430 Yaxley 3.7.430 Wimblington Boots Drove To Oundle 430 Pondersbridge 206.X4 Morborne Bridge 129 430 56 Doddington Hundred Foot Bank 15 115 203 56 46.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Voices Febrary 2010
    Village Voices Febrary 2010 Village Voices is produced by the parish churches for the local community providing news and information for: Guyhirn-Gorefield-Murrow-Parson Drove-Rings End-Tholomas Drove-Thorney Toll-Wisbech St Mary A warm welcome to all newcomers&visitors to our villages! IT’S SNOW JOKE! Vicar’s Verbals The snow is still lying deep around The recent severe weather caused havoc with many events over the the Vicarage as I write these words. Christmas period. I hope by the time you read them the One of the biggest disappointments was the cancellation of the Christmas th worst of the bad weather will have Festival in WSM church on December 18 which was to have featured the passed. The extra time in my study Cantus choir. Snow and ice and plunging temperatures made it impossible has given me an opportunity to for people to turn out. catch up with some paperwork and Attendances at Midnight Mass in WSM & Guyhirn and Parson Drove plan the next church rota. I am churches were affected. consequently thinking about events For the first time in recent years the Church Mart in the Church House, which will not happen until the WSM, was called off in January. summer heat is already waning! The annual Epiphany Service in Guyhirn’s Chapel of Ease was postponed th Meanwhile there has been a debate until Saturday January 30 at 2.30pm. on the radio about whether it is right 150 years ago, Christina Rossetti described a winter scene which matched to take the opportunity the snow has our Christmas in 2009: presented to stay off work and play In the bleak mid-winter, frosty wind made moan; snowballs with the kids.
    [Show full text]
  • Aroma House, 55 Harlton Road, Little Eversden
    Aroma House, 55 Harlton Road, Little Eversden Aroma House, 55 Harlton Road, Little Eversden, Cambridgeshire, CB23 1HD An extended Victorian house with delightful established gardens of just under half an acre, with potential development opportunity, in this small, highly regarded south west Cambridgeshire village. Cambridge 7 miles, Royston (fast train to King's Cross) 9 miles, M11 (junction 12) 5 miles, (distances are approximate). Gross internal floor area 1,945 sq.ft (181 sq.m) plus Studio Annexe 23'1 x 12'5 (7.04m x 3.78m) Ground Floor: Reception Hall, Cloakroom, Study, Sitting Room, Dining Room, Breakfast Room, Kitchen, Utility Room. First Floor: 4 Bedrooms, 2 Bathrooms (1 En Suite). Stonecross Trumpington High Street Outside: Off Street Parking, Workshop/Store, Wonderful Mature Gardens, Studio/Annexe with Sitting Cambridge Room, Shower Room and Mezzanine Sleeping Platform. CB2 9SU t: 01223 841842 In all about half an acre. e: [email protected] f: 01223 840721 bidwells.co.uk Please read Important Notice on the last page of text Particulars of Sale Situation Little Eversden is a small, attractive village Particular features of note include: - conveniently situated about 7 miles south west of Cambridge. There is a recreation ground with play Delightful dual aspect Sitting Room with Stylish Kitchen, re-fitted in 2007 with range of area for young children within close proximity, an glazed door to terrace, fireplace with inset matching base and wall cabinet's, granite work Italian restaurant within about half a mile and an wood burning stove and twin archways to surfaces and integrated Neff appliances Indian restaurant and village hall in the neighbouring adjoining Dining Room.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Voices August 2011
    Village Voices August 2011 Village Voices is produced by the parish churches for the local community providing news and information for: Gorefield- Guyhirn-Harold’s Bridge Murrow-Parson Drove-Rings End-Tholomas Drove-Thorney Toll- Wisbech St Mary A warm welcome to all newcomer and visitors to our villages! CHARITY BIKE RIDE A HUGE SUCCESS Andy and Dawn at the Bell, Murrow, wish to thank everyone who supported their annual ten- mile bike ride for charity. A grand total of £759 was raised from the ride, a quiz, a raffle and a BBQ. Special thanks to Peter and Steve the BBQ chefs, to Emma and Tony Jarvis the “Piles”, to Tony Hale and his family for raising over £450, and to Michael at the Chequers. OPEN GARDENS DAY A BLOOMING SUCCESS: ‘Vicar’s VerVerbals’bals’ £730 RAISED This year's Wisbech St Mary Open Weddings are always a delight and I am especially honoured to be conducting Garden Day on June 25th was a more this year than in my previous years in the parishes. Many of the couples I resounding success. The nine am marrying have been living together for several years, some have quite large varied and beautiful gardens were families already, and I always ask them, ‘Why get married now?’ The answers are visited by over 120 people enjoying generally similar, that they have intended to ‘tie the knot’ for quite some time but the warm weather, and the other things have occupied them such as careers, house-hunting, children, caring amazing sum of £730 was raised for elderly relatives and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees
    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Huntingdonshire Local Plan to 2036 Sustainability Appraisal Explanatory Note
    Huntingdonshire Local Plan to 2036 Sustainability Appraisal Explanatory Note Huntingdonshire District Council | Huntingdonshire Local Plan to 2036 Sustainability Appraisal Explanatory Note 1 Contents Huntingdonshire District Council | Huntingdonshire Local Plan to 2036 Sustainability Appraisal Explanatory Note 1 Introduction 1 2 Growth target 2 3 Distribution of growth 4 Appendices 1 Call for Sites July 2017 9 2 Summary Table of Site Sustainability Appraisals 10 Introduction 1 Huntingdonshire District Council | Huntingdonshire Local Plan to 2036 Sustainability Appraisal Explanatory Note 1 Introduction 1.1 The purpose of this explanatory note is to provide clarification on the decision-making processes which informed the selection of the growth target and the distribution of growth within the Huntingdonshire Proposed Submission Local Plan to 2036. This has been prepared following the discussions which took place at the Local Plan examination hearing sessions held on 17 July 2018. 1.2 This note supplements the Final Sustainability Appraisal Report submitted for examination on 29th March 2018 which can be found at: Final Sustainability Appraisal. It draws together elements from HELAA, particularly the site specific sustainability appraisals, and the assessments of growth targets, distribution of growth, individual site appraisals and significant changes to the Local Plan during its preparation presented in the Sustainability Appraisal to provide clarification on how the overall development strategy was prepared in the light of the alternatives that were considered. 1.3 All page references quoted are from the Final Sustainability Appraisal unless otherwise stated. 1 2 Growth target Huntingdonshire District Council | Huntingdonshire Local Plan to 2036 Sustainability Appraisal Explanatory Note 2 Growth target 2.1 In 2012 three growth options were identified and published for consultation.
    [Show full text]