ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES WASHINGTON, D.C. 2003
ARL STATISTICS 2001-02
A COMPILATION OF STATISTICS FROM THE ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES
Compiled and Edited by
MARTHA KYRILLIDOU MARK YOUNG
ARL Statistics is published annually by
Association of Research Libraries 21 Dupont Circle, NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 296-2296 FAX: (202) 872-0884 email: [email protected]
The ARL Statistics datafiles, with accompanying documentation, are available at
The tables presented in this publication are not indicative of performance and outcomes and should not be used as measures of library quality. In comparing any individual library to ARL medians or to other ARL members, one must be careful to make such comparisons within the context of differing institutional and local goals and characteristics.
ISSN 0147-2135
© Copyright Notice The compilation is copyrighted by the Association of Research Libraries. Blanket permission is granted to reproduce and distribute copies of this work for nonprofit, educational, or library purposes, provided that the author, source, and copyright notice are included on each copy. This permission is in addition to rights of reproduction granted under Sections 107, 108, and other provisions of the U.S. Copyright Act.
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of National Information Standards Organization — Permanence of Paper for Publications and Documents in Libraries and Archives, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R1997).
Printed in the United States of America TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARL Statistics 2001-02: Research Library Trends ...... 5
ARL Statistics Interactive Edition on the World Wide Web...... 21
ARL Library Data Tables, 2001-02 Collections...... 24 Summary Data ...... 30 Expenditures...... 32 Summary Data ...... 38 Personnel and Public Services...... 40 Summary Data ...... 46
Analysis of Selected Variables...... 48
Ph.D., Faculty, and Enrollment Statistics ...... 49 Summary Data ...... 51
Rank Order Tables of University Libraries, 2001-02
Summary of Rank Order Tables ...... 54
Individual Tables 1. Volumes in Library...... 57 2. Volumes Added (Gross)...... 58 3. Current Serials (Total) ...... 59 4. Microform Units...... 60 5. Government Documents...... 61 6. Total Library Materials Expenditures ...... 62 7. Total Salaries & Wages Expenditures ...... 63 8. Other Operating Expenditures...... 64 9. Total Library Expenditures...... 65 10. Monographs Purchased (Volumes)...... 66 11. Expenditures for Monographs ...... 67 12. Current Serials Purchased (Subscriptions)...... 68 13. Expenditures for Current Serials ...... 69 14. Total Items Loaned (ILL/DD)...... 70 15. Total Items Borrowed (ILL/DD)...... 71 16. Professional Staff (FTE) ...... 72 17. Support Staff (FTE) ...... 73 18. Total Staff (FTE)...... 74
3
ARL Statistics Questionnaire and Instructions, 2001-02...... 76
Footnotes to the ARL Statistics 2001-02 ...... 87
Appendix A. ARL Member Libraries as of January 2003...... 110
Appendix B. Bibliography...... 112
GRAPHS
1. Service Trends in ARL Libraries, 1991-2002...... 8 2. Monograph and Serial Costs in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002...... 10 3. Supply and Demand in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002 ...... 14 4. Expenditure Trends in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002...... 16 5. Resources per Student in ARL University Libraries, 1986-2002...... 17
TABLES
1. Service Trends in ARL Libraries, 1991-2002...... 7 2. Monograph and Serial Costs in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002...... 9 3. Supply and Demand in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002 ...... 12 4. Expenditure Trends in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002...... 15 5. Resources per Student in ARL University Libraries, 1986-2002...... 18
4 ARL STATISTICS 2001-02: RESEARCH LIBRARY TRENDS
ARL Statistics 2001-02 is the latest in a series of annual publications that describe collections, staffing, expenditures, and service activities for the 124 members of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). Of these, 114 are university libraries; the remaining 10 are public, governmental, and private research libraries. A complete list of the ARL member libraries is provided in Appendix A. ARL member libraries are the largest research libraries in North America, representing 16 Canadian and 108 U.S. research institutions. The academic libraries, which comprise about 92% of the membership, include 14 Canadian and 100 U.S. libraries.
Statistics have been collected and published annually for the members of the Association of Research Libraries since 1961-62, and the data are available through a WWW interactive interface.1 Prior to 1961-62, annual statistics for university libraries were collected by James Gerould, first at the University of Minnesota and later at Princeton University.2 These data, covering the years 1907-08 through 1961-62, are now called the Gerould statistics.3 The whole data series from 1908, which is available on the ARL FTP server,4 represents the oldest and most comprehensive continuing library statistical series in North America. An interactive web edition is also supported by the University of Virginia, Geosciences Data Center.
ARL libraries are a relatively small subset of libraries in North America, but they do account for a large portion of academic library resources in terms of assets, budgets, and the number of users they serve. The total library expenditures of all 124 member libraries in 2001-02 was more than $3.2 billion; from that, about $2.5 billion was spent by the 114 university libraries and just over $750 million by the nonuniversity libraries.
University Libraries Nonuniversity Libraries
Library Materials Contract 8% Binding Other 0.3% Operating Library 14% Materials 39% Other Operating 42% Total Total Salaries Contract Salar ies 46% Binding 50% 1%
1
5 EVOLUTION OF DEFINITIONS: A MOVING TARGET
Definitions of the statistical categories used in the ARL Statistics questionnaire can be found in Library Statistics, ANSI/NISO Z39.7-1995 (Bethesda, MD: NISO Press, 1997).5 ANSI/NISO Z39.7-1995 has undergone a recent revision and NISO Z39.7-2002 Draft Standard for Trial Use is now available.6 ARL has gradually modified the interpretation of the standard definitions to accommodate electronic resources based on conventions described in the ARL Statistics Q&A.7 These conventions have been established through discussions within the ARL Statistics and Measurement Committee8 and with the ARL Survey Coordinators9 who fill in these surveys on an annual basis. For example, in relation to electronic serials, see a discussion document developed by Julia Blixrud.10
Graph 1 Service Trends in ARL Libraries, 1991-2002
110% Interlibrary Borrowing (+106%)
90%
Participants 70% in Group Group Presentations Presentations (+57%) (+55%)
50%
Circulation Ratio: Initial 30% to Total (+20%) Total Total Students Initial Total Staff (+9%)
% Change Since 1991 Circulation Circulation** 10% (+4%) (-15%) (-10%)
-10%
-30% Reference Transactions (-26%) In-House Use (-35%) -50% ** Total Circulation includes Initial and Renewals but excludes Reserve Circulation Source: ARL Statistics 2001-02 , Association of Research Libraries, 2003
5 See also
6
The ARL Statistics and Measurement Committee decided not to add new data elements to the existing established annual surveys, but rather continue to modify the interpretation of the existing definitions by including electronic resources, electronic journals, and e-books in the existing categories. For example, in 1999- 2000 e-books were reported together with volumes held for the first time, as long as the library owns these e- books and they conform to a print-equivalent model (see ARL Statistics Q&A for further clarification). In general terms, there is a sense that the ARL Statistics, which primarily focus on input and output measures, have served libraries adequately by describing the range of resources and service activities in a quantifiable manner. Development efforts tend to focus on the ARL New Measures Initiative projects11 which place more emphasis on service quality, impact and outcome indicators (where there is general agreement that libraries lack agreed-upon frameworks), and tools they can use to measure these aspects of their operations successfully.
Table 1 Service Trends in ARL Libraries, 1991-2002 Median Values for Time-Series Trends12
Year Interlibrary Group Participants Reference Initial Total Ratio of Total Total In-House Borrowing Presentations In Group Transactions Circulation Circulation Initial to Staff Students Use Presentations Total Circ.
(No. of Libraries) (106) (86) (84) (82) (36) (81) (34) (106) (106) (47)
1991 10,342 518 7,228 133,022 296,964 516,429 1.26 271 18,290 754,336 1992 11,318 544 7,466 135,609 342,989 561,492 1.27 267 18,273 850,983 1993 12,486 630 7,838 140,847 343,293 577,873 1.32 263 18,450 914,405 1994 13,996 570 8,017 153,607 369,996 574,206 1.31 266 18,287 888,330 1995 14,403 687 8,571 151,878 347,144 579,298 1.32 268 18,089 923,174 1996 15,260 719 8,556 157,563 336,481 561,987 1.39 266 18,269 915,816 1997 16,362 713 9,218 158,294 348,157 549,878 1.37 274 18,063 775,228 1998 17,684 714 9,462 134,944 354,924 518,838 1.37 275 18,245 755,562 1999 18,998 713 9,406 129,089 300,923 517,812 1.38 281 18,502 724,250 2000 20,415 731 9,656 117,027 273,231 486,409 1.42 272 18,818 570,679 2001 21,601 676 10,333 105,087 265,195 468,753 1.48 274 19,083 532,117 2002 21,323 804 11,350 98,568 251,146 464,704 1.51 282 19,911 492,145 Average annual 6.8% 4.1% 4.2% -2.7% -1.5% -1.0% 1.6% 0.3% 0.8% -3.8% percent change
SERVICE ACTIVITY TRENDS
The success of an academic library is dependent not only on the information resources it owns or licenses, but also on the services it provides. ARL collects data about public service activities such as circulation (initial and total), reference transactions, library instruction (group presentations and participants in these presentations), and interlibrary borrowing and lending (see Table 1). These data, rather than being comprehensive for the range of user- initiated library activities, represent select service areas. In addition to these categories collected through the ARL Statistics, in-house use of library materials has also been collected through the ARL Supplementary Statistics.13
Readers should be cautious when they use service indicators for comparisons across institutions because local policies can influence the level of service activities. For example, loan periods, which are usually determined by local policies, vary widely among libraries; thus, a library with a shorter loan period will report a larger number of circulation transactions than will a library with a longer loan period, other things being equal. Despite the standardization efforts at the definitional level, there is wide variation at the local level in terms of the processes used to deliver service and to account for such services. With this in mind, it is useful to look at the trends of these select
11 ARL New Measures Initiative:
7 services assuming that changes due to policies and other conditions affecting measurement of services are random across institutions.
The median value of the ratio of total to initial circulation has also been gradually increasing over the last few years, indicating that users are more likely to renew library materials, or possibly that they want the materials in their hands for longer periods of time. Initial circulation is declining more slowly compared to total circulation, showing that although the general circulation is declining, the use of the material is more intense as reflected by the need of the users to keep materials with them for longer periods. Keeping the material in the hands of the users also alleviates the space demands made on libraries by the continuing growth of their collections.
Table 1 indicates that certain service areas are increasing whereas others are decreasing their activity levels in relation to 1991. Overall, library staffing has remained roughly constant. Starting in 1996 circulation service transactions began to decline, in 1998 reference transactions began to fall, and in 2000 both categories dropped below 1991 levels for the first time. Group presentations spiked downward in 2001, but shot back up in 2002 to the highest figure ever recorded; meanwhile, the number of participants in those presentations continues to increase with (11,350 participants for the typical research library. Interlibrary borrowing has grown constantly since 1991, but this year shows a steady rate compared to last year.
Last year for the first time we reported data regarding in-house use, which had previously gone unpublished, that also show declines. This decline is in keeping with a trend reported in the Chronicle of Higher Education: students deserting campus libraries to work online and use electronic resources.14 As a response to this behavior, libraries are creating more appealing and comfortable environments, emulating the model created by chain bookstores such as Borders and introducing coffee shops in appropriate locations. Libraries are also purchasing and making available increasingly larger amounts of electronic resources, as is evident from the increasing amount of money spent on electronic resources as reported in the ARL Supplementary Statistics.
A variety of explanations have been voiced regarding the decline of the number of reference transactions. Many libraries are making a concerted effort to examine the changing user needs that impact reference services in general. Heavy users of library materials and services may make less use of in-person reference services than did such users in the era before the availability of online catalogs, remote access to indexing and abstracting databases, and electronic full-text resources delivered at the desktop. Often, those people who do approach reference librarians require more assistance than before. At the same time, virtual reference services are adding another dimension to the growing complexity of responding to reference questions. Libraries have instituted initiatives with a deliberate emphasis on direct contact between subject specialists and departments (shifting research consultation activity away from desk-based service). Thus, a simple count where each reference question gets a single “tally” cannot capture the varying dimensions and growing complexities of reference services. While patterns of behavior are changing and there is a decline in reference transactions, the overall numbers are still substantial, with 98,568 questions per year for the median ARL library.
Demand for library user education and interlibrary borrowing has been high over the last few years. As seen in Graph 1, since 1991 instructional sessions (group presentations) have risen by 55%, participants in these sessions by 57%, and interlibrary borrowing by 106%. Perhaps of most interest is the fact that by 2002, more than 36% of the instructional sessions conducted in a typical ARL library had been added since 1991. The typical ARL library offered over 800 “teaching” sessions in 2001-02. If we assume that each session was at least an hour long, then the median ARL library offered the equivalent of 22 three-hour credit courses last year. Each course was attended on average by 14 people with a median number of 11,350 people receiving formal education through library instruction in a typical ARL library. Information literacy has become an important program area for libraries and the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) has developed widely used "Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education.”15 Efforts are underway through the ARL New Measures Initiative to define how libraries contribute to student learning outcomes from a user-centered perspective: Ken Smith developed a white paper for ARL on the
14 Scott Carlson, “The Deserted Library: As Students Work Online, Reading Rooms Empty Out – Leading Some Campuses to Add Starbucks.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, November 16, 2001. 15
8 library’s role in this area.16 One of the ARL New Measures Initiatives also attempts to develop standardized metrics for measuring the information literacy skills of students.17
CHANGE IN SERIAL UNIT COSTS
The story of struggling library budgets has been told in terms of the “serials crisis.” Serial unit costs have been increasing at rates that are much larger than inflation for a long period of time – almost two decades of such trends have been documented through the ARL Statistics (See Table 2 and Graph 2). Library serial subscriptions exhibit extreme inelasticity of demand (i.e., the demand is very high for continuing a subscription), sometimes to the detriment of other budget lines such as books and salaries.
Table 2 Monograph and Serial Costs in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002 Median Values for Time-Series Trends
Year Serial Serial Monograph Monograph Serials Monographs Unit Cost Expenditures Unit Cost Expenditures Purchased Purchased
(No. of Libraries) (38) (103) (61) (99) (38) (61) 1986 $88.55 $1,517,724 $28.70 $1,120,645 16,173 32,425 1987 $105.48 $1,770,567 $31.81 $1,064,484 16,601 26,204 1988 $116.65 $1,979,604 $36.03 $1,141,226 16,254 25,529 1989 $128.59 $2,130,162 $38.43 $1,241,133 16,298 26,997 1990 $132.45 $2,304,744 $40.41 $1,330,747 16,221 27,545 1991 $153.46 $2,578,309 $42.29 $1,400,738 16,251 27,388 1992 $168.20 $2,630,827 $43.76 $1,353,865 15,896 25,953 1993 $186.50 $2,919,756 $43.74 $1,295,807 15,668 24,933 1994 $195.99 $2,932,091 $44.29 $1,309,807 15,698 25,321 1995 $213.05 $3,133,885 $44.98 $1,365,575 14,741 25,695 1996 $221.17 $3,393,307 $46.73 $1,444,015 15,223 25,560 1997 $244.33 $3,674,368 $46.42 $1,460,234 15,450 28,494 1998 $244.88 $3,818,832 $47.59 $1,486,764 15,166 24,133 1999 $269.90 $4,098,075 $47.05 $1,506,651 15,260 24,311 2000 $301.09 $4,431,593 $47.59 $1,657,349 15,223 27,243 2001 $279.07 $4,710,371 $48.09 $1,864,023 15,342 29,518 2002 $289.84 $4,963,111 $50.17 $1,812,826 17,676 30,752
Average annual 7.7% 7.7% 3.6% 3.1% 0.6% -0.3% percent change
16 Ken Smith, “New Roles and Responsibilities for the University Library: Advancing Student Learning Through Outcomes Assessment.” Washington: Association of Research Libraries, May 4, 2000,
9 Graph 2 Monograph and Serial Costs in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002
250%
Serial Unit Cost (+227%)
Serial 200% Expenditures (+227%)
150%
100% Monograph Unit Cost (+75%) % Change Since 1986
50% Monograph Expenditures (+62%)
Serials 0% Purchased (+9%) Monographs Purchased (-5%) -50% 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Source: ARL Statistics 2001-02 , Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C.
10 Recent national data collected through one of the New Measures Initiative Projects, the LibQUAL+TM project, show that this demand may relate to very strong user perceptions across the nation that libraries are not adequately meeting the need of access to full runs of journal titles and delivering full-text on the desktop.18 Ownership and access are interrelated in the way users perceive library services; distinctions between the two may only exist from the perspective of the research library, where ownership of materials may be more closely linked to preservation functions. It is clear that some of the major scientific and technical publishers have recognized this demand for high quality information sources delivered effectively and efficiently in an electronic fashion. Yet it is not clear whether the issues of preservation and quality control (such as assuring integrity and authenticity) of the electronic medium have been adequately addressed.
In 2001, for the first time since 1986, the median serial unit cost declined from a high of over $300 to slightly less than $280. However, that median increased again this year by 4%, to $290. It is not clear what might have caused the decline in 2001, but several factors may have contributed. One is the ways in which ARL data concerning electronic journals are reported. In informal conversations held with some ARL libraries, it seems that the inclusion of electronic serials in the counts of serial subscriptions purchased caused a slight increase in purchased serials – often, for a relatively small addition to the base subscription price, some publishers provide access to electronic resources for an additional 10 or 20% surcharge. Furthermore, the elimination of the print subscription may have resulted in discounted subscription fees for the electronic-only title; a library may have access to the electronic-only version of a journal for 80% (or some other fraction) of the print subscription price.
Another factor that may be contributing to the lower serial unit cost is consortial licensing arrangements for electronic journals, where the cost of the license is spread among participating libraries. The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) was launched by ARL in June 1998 to promote competition in the scholarly publishing marketplace by creating “partnerships” with publishers who are developing high-quality, economical alternatives to existing high-priced publications. SPARC's activities have been featured in the popular press, helped increase awareness of the challenges facing libraries, and initiated specific actions aimed towards increasing competition in the largely monopolistic field of scientific scholarly publishing.19 Rick Johnson provides an overview of the context that gave birth to SPARC and its publishing alternatives such as BioOne.20 As a result, a final explanation of the decline in the serial unit cost may be that these partnerships and coalitions are putting market pressures on publishers to control prices.
Publishers are often responding to these pressures by attempts to increase their market share and control with merger activities. Concerns over merger activities in the publishing industry and their effect on journal prices were heightened with the release of the antitrust report released by the UK Competition Commission regarding the proposed merger of Reed Elsevier plc and Harcourt General, Inc. Highlights from the report emphasize that “to take decisions about which subscriptions to keep and which to give us, [libraries] do so almost entirely on the basis of an assessment of a journal’s relative quality and academic pressure. If financial constraints mean that an institution cannot subscribe to all of the journals that it would like to – or even that it used to – get, then it is more likely to sacrifice those that are comparatively weakest in the field, rather than those that are most expensive.” 21 These findings echo earlier work reported by Mark McCabe regarding the inelasticity of the library marketplace.22 Concerns about creating strong monopoly powers were expressed in the report, but the majority opinion determined that at this point there were no concerns operating against the public interest. The minority opinion expressed the concern that mergers can result in higher prices and more restrictive mechanisms for access to STM journals.23
18 Association of Research Libraries, LibQUAL+TM Spring 2002 Survey Results: Volume 1 Aggregate Survey Results (Washington: Association of Research Libraries, 2002), and LibQUAL+TM Spring 2002 Survey Results: Volume 5 Association of Research Libraries Survey Results (Washington: Association of Research Libraries, 2002). See also: Thompson, B., Cook, C., & Thompson, R.L., “Reliability and Structure of LibQUAL+ Scores.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 2 (2002): 3-12; Cook, C., Heath, F., and Thompson, B., “Score Norms for Improving Library Service Quality: A LibQUAL+ Study.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 2 (2002): 13-26; Heath, F., Cook, C., Kyrillidou, M., & Thompson, B., “ARL Index and Other Validity Correlates of LibQUAL+ Scores.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 2 (2002): 27-42. 19 For more information, go to the SPARC homepage:
11
A recent report by Morgan Stanley, Scientific Publishing: Knowledge is Power, highlights the trends in the European media industry. Morgan Stanley expects yields averaging 6% in 2003, with scientific journals being the fastest growing media sub-sector of the past 15 years. They also view the ruling by the UK Competition Commission positively from the perspective of journal publishers and expressing concerns that if journal publishers do not moderate price increases they will run the risk of regulation. Although some cyclical slowdown due to funding pressures is forecast, the electronic delivery of published products will increase the value of these products to users. Morgan Stanley also believes that smaller publishers will be hurt more by budget cuts rather than larger ones, since larger publishers will be able to increase the value proposition to their users due to the quantity of journal titles they offer and their ability to more easily bundle lower quality titles with higher quality ones. 24 Yet the quality of managing the process of serial titles for the auditing needs of libraries is not being resolved adequately by publishers, according to Rush Miller, who sees intermediaries and subscription agencies still serving as an important asset for quality management purposes in tracking journals.25
Table 3 Supply and Demand in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002 Median Values for Time-Series Trends
Year Interlibrary Interlibrary Graduate Teaching Total Serials Monographs Borrowing Lending Students Faculty Students Purchased Purchased
(No. of Libraries) (106) (106) (106) (103) (106) (38) (61)
1986 7,049 16,152 3,040 1,125 16,684 16,173 32,425 1987 7,362 16,608 3,148 1,234 17,029 16,601 26,204 1988 7,914 18,060 3,259 1,243 17,485 16,254 25,529 1989 8,548 19,317 3,346 1,293 17,866 16,298 26,997 1990 9,588 20,815 3,357 1,280 17,745 16,221 27,545 1991 10,342 22,056 3,362 1,303 18,290 16,251 27,388 1992 11,318 22,547 3,572 1,401 18,273 15,896 25,953 1993 12,486 22,840 3,842 1,303 18,450 15,668 24,933 1994 13,996 24,293 3,815 1,304 18,287 15,698 25,321 1995 14,403 25,201 3,984 1,321 18,089 14,741 25,695 1996 15,259 25,947 3,975 1,254 18,269 15,223 25,560 1997 16,362 26,423 3,996 1,274 18,063 15,450 28,494 1998 17,684 27,256 3,926 1,252 18,245 15,166 24,133 1999 18,997 26,688 4,017 1,301 18,502 15,260 24,311 2000 20,415 27,015 3,918 1,242 18,818 15,223 27,243 2001 21,601 29,255 4,230 1,295 19,083 15,342 29,518 2002 21,323 29,108 4,113 1,295 19,911 17,676 30,752
Average annual 7.2% 3.7% 1.9% 0.9% 1.1% 0.6% -0.3% percent change
OWNERSHIP AND ACCESS
It is noteworthy that the decline in the unit cost documented last year has been followed this year by the number of serial subscriptions increasing above 1986 levels for the first time since 1992. This is most likely due to the same reasons cited above, including increased availability of electronic subscriptions and consortial arrangements. Research libraries purchased 15% more subscriptions in 2002, or a median of 17,676 subscriptions. They also slightly increased the number of monographs purchased to 30,752, although the number is still less than 1986 levels. To meet the demands of increasing serial prices during the last decade, libraries shifted expenditures from monographs to serials; expenditures for monographs declined 3% over the last year, while at the same time the monograph unit cost increased 4%.
24 Paul Gooden, Matthew Owen and Sarah Simon, Morgan Stanley: Equity Research: Europe: Industry: Media: Scientific Publishing: Knowledge is Power (September 27, 2002). 25 Chuck Hamaker and Rebecca Lenzini, “EBSCO and Elsevier: Pitt’s New Experiment, a Discussion with Rush Miller, Director of Libraries at the University of Pittsburgh (Volume 4, Number 3, January 2003)
12
Since 1986, the average annual increase for the serial unit cost has been 7.7%, and for the monograph unit cost 3.6%. Both are higher than the general inflation trend during the same period, accommodating both print and electronic resources (frequently with some duplication between the two media forms). Thus, the intellectual capital purchased by libraries is declining not only due to reduced purchasing power but also due to the degree of content duplication between the electronic and print medium as duplication exists between electronic journals and books and their print equivalents. E-books are included in the ARL Statistics as part of the traditional categories such as volumes held, volumes added gross, and monographs purchased, to the extent that they are cataloged and classified.
In 1986, the typical ARL library subscribed to 16,173 serials and bought 32,425 monographs for 16,684 students and 1,125 faculty. In 2002 it bought 17,676 serials and 30,752 monographs for 19,911 students and 1,295 faculty. To this mix, we should add that libraries are increasingly providing improved access without purchase of materials; for example, serials received (not purchased) increased 170% since 1986, from a median number of 3,318 subscriptions in 1986 to about 9,000 in 2002. This increase is due to some extent to previously uncataloged government documents whose records were recently added to the library catalog as they were made more readily available through programs such a MARCIVE. However, it is likely that emerging trends such as the open access movement26 and institutional digital repositories27 will increase this trend in the future. As alternative publishing models are becoming more widespread and acceptable, libraries will probably increase the proportion of the holdings they provide access to,28 whether they manifest themselves as serials or other new emerging forms, despite attempts to shut down government-funded information services offering free data.29
Interlibrary borrowing and lending, which showed a marked growth in the last decade in research libraries, seems to be stabilizing. Between 1986 and 2002, the number of items borrowed has tripled. An ARL ILL/DD Performance Measures Study found that the average cost of a borrowing transaction was $18.35 in 1995-96 U.S. dollars for a research library.30 By contrast, the unit cost of purchase is $289.84 for a serial subscription or $50.17 for a monograph (as listed in Table 2), plus processing costs of perhaps $55 or more. Thus, based on cost alone in relation to annual use, a library could consider purchasing a serial only if it is to be used at least 19 times per year and a monograph only if it will be used at least six times.31 Even if processing costs are excluded, a serial subscription still needs to be used 16 times in a year and a monograph at least three times to consider making a purchasing decision. If the anticipated use for a particular serial subscription or monograph is below these thresholds, it may be more economical to acquire information through interlibrary loans. Of course, this economic scenario works only as long as libraries collect materials regardless of annual usage and are willing to provide those materials through interlibrary loan. ARL data show research libraries are lending 80% more items today than they did 16 years ago. In 1995-96, the cost of a lending transaction for research libraries ranged from a low of $4.87 to a high of $16.34, with an average cost of $9.48 or, with an adjustment for inflation, a 2001-02 average cost of $15.55.32
26 Mary Case and Judith Matz, “Framing the Issue: Open Access” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 226 (February 2003): 8-10
13 Graph 3 Supply and Demand in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002
Interlibrary Borrowing 200% (+203%)
150%
100% Interlibrary Lending (+80%)
Grad. Students (+35%) % Change Since 1986 50% Total Students (+19%)
Faculty (+15%)
0% Serials Purchased (+9%)
Monographs Purchased -50% (-5%) 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Source: ARL Statistics 2001-02 , Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C.
14
Table 4 Expenditure Trends in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002 Median Values for Time-Series Trends – Unadjusted dollar figures
Year Library Serial Monograph Total Salary Operating Total CPI Materials Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures
(No. of Libraries) (106) (103) (99) (106) (106) (106)
1986 $2,707,219 $1,517,724 $1,120,645 $4,108,616 $1,134,008 $8,390,865 109.6 1987 $3,083,288 $1,770,567 $1,064,484 $4,390,277 $1,191,641 $9,006,308 113.6 1988 $3,371,421 $1,979,604 $1,141,226 $4,737,470 $1,209,633 $9,623,944 118.3 1989 $3,582,400 $2,130,162 $1,241,133 $5,278,104 $1,389,321 $10,332,186 124.0 1990 $3,913,466 $2,304,744 $1,330,747 $5,500,869 $1,408,280 $11,243,645 130.7 1991 $4,083,358 $2,578,309 $1,400,738 $5,977,903 $1,463,873 $12,032,893 136.2 1992 $4,160,064 $2,630,827 $1,353,865 $6,113,071 $1,406,661 $12,264,226 140.3 1993 $4,332,769 $2,919,756 $1,295,807 $6,034,232 $1,609,350 $12,331,859 144.5 1994 $4,577,203 $2,932,091 $1,309,807 $6,183,885 $1,686,070 $12,775,909 148.2 1995 $4,729,921 $3,133,885 $1,365,575 $6,349,708 $1,871,603 $13,204,133 152.4 1996 $5,157,375 $3,393,307 $1,444,015 $6,675,390 $2,035,496 $13,885,477 156.9 1997 $5,577,348 $3,674,368 $1,460,234 $6,922,290 $2,058,496 $14,652,763 160.5 1998 $5,817,324 $3,818,832 $1,486,764 $7,300,236 $2,107,948 $15,410,758 163.0 1999 $6,263,648 $4,098,075 $1,506,651 $7,505,235 $2,141,325 $16,761,071 166.6 2000 $6,748,295 $4,431,593 $1,657,349 $7,891,724 $2,013,818 $17,223,290 172.2 2001 $7,352,480 $4,710,371 $1,864,023 $8,201,230 $2,294,580 $17,889,213 177.5 2002 $7,677,915 $4,963,111 $1,812,826 $8,556,378 $2,173,542 $18,482,112 180.1
Average annual 6.7% 7.7% 3.1% 4.7% 4.2% 5.1% 3.2% percent change
However, research libraries have archival and preservation responsibilities for future generations; cost considerations of short-term use are not adequate to ensure research level collections, whether in digital or analog formats. According to the most recent report on collections and access issued by ARL “developments in digital technology, the introduction of the Web and the Internet, and new methods of creating, sharing, and using knowledge have changed dramatically the traditionally understood definitions of library collections and access services. Building collections and creating access to them are no longer achieved just within the walls of the library. Broadly defined, collections and access responsibilities are no longer distinct spheres within research libraries. Collections and access responsibilities are inextricably linked—with each other, with other functions in the parent institutions, and, indeed, with other institutions. This interdependent and fluid environment presents challenges but, more importantly, it presents opportunities for librarians to take leadership roles in creating new information services in support of research and learning and thereby diffuse the library throughout the institution.”33
33 "Collections & Access for the 21st-Century Scholar: Changing Roles of Research Libraries." A Report from the ARL Collections & Access Issues Task Force. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 225 (December 2002).
15 Graph 4 Expenditure Trends in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002
Serial Expenditures (+227%) 230%
Library Materials 200% (+184%)
170% 6 TOTAL 140% (+120%) Total Salaries (+108%) 110% Operating Expenditures % Change Since 198 (+92%) 80% CPI (+64%)
Monograph 50% Expenditures (+62%)
20%
-10% 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Source: ARL Statistics 2001-02 , Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C.
16
Table 5 Resources per Student in ARL University Libraries, 1986-2002 Median of Ratio Values for Time-Series Trends
Year Interlibrary Volumes Volumes Total Serials Monographs Borrowing Held Added (Gross) Staff Purchased Purchased
(No. of Libraries) (106) (106) (106) (106) (38) (61)
1986 0.42 123.97 4.18 0.0160 0.90 2.15 1987 0.43 126.34 4.07 0.0165 0.87 1.86 1988 0.43 129.34 3.85 0.0162 0.87 1.66 1989 0.50 131.04 3.79 0.0164 0.90 1.75 1990 0.54 134.45 3.90 0.0159 0.88 1.83 1991 0.62 137.79 4.00 0.0154 0.85 1.79 1992 0.61 140.79 3.97 0.0154 0.85 1.54 1993 0.67 146.44 3.82 0.0154 0.83 1.49 1994 0.74 151.77 4.17 0.0154 0.80 1.50 1995 0.79 154.82 4.43 0.0150 0.85 1.56 1996 0.85 159.74 3.81 0.0147 0.83 1.44 1997 0.89 160.52 4.03 0.0144 0.80 1.52 1998 0.97 160.16 4.08 0.0147 0.79 1.41 1999 1.05 162.48 4.01 0.0145 0.80 1.41 2000 1.11 159.93 3.83 0.0142 0.78 1.52 2001 1.16 161.61 3.91 0.0137 0.80 1.60 2002 1.11 158.95 3.89 0.0132 0.83 1.54
Annual average 6.3% 1.6% -0.4% -1.2% -0.5% -2.1% percent change
The financial picture for research libraries is evident in Graph 4. Library material budgets have been rising sharply in order to sustain serial expenditures. Operating expenditures, where many automation expenditures are included, have doubled since 1986, but during the last five years have remained at relatively stable levels of investment– slightly more than $2 million for the typical ARL library. The total salary expenditures median has increased only slightly over the past four years. This trend, in combination with the uneven trend of recent staff increases and reductions, is indicative of the difficulties libraries are having in recruitment and the mechanisms they are trying to develop to compensate for the historically low salaries paid to their employees (see Graph 5). Monograph expenditures continue to increase, but at a much slower pace to accommodate the sharply increasing serial expenditures. The annual consumer price index (CPI), included on Graph 4, provides a reference for the increases in library expenditures.
Table 5, “Resources per Student in ARL University Libraries,” shows that borrowing activity per student through interlibrary loan has continued to increase at an annual average rate of 6.3% since 1986. Further, libraries are borrowing two-and-a-half times more items on a per student basis than they did 16 years ago.34 However, as is also shown in Table 5, acquisition levels for both serials and monographs per student continue to slide. In 2002, ARL libraries acquired 28% fewer monographs and 8% fewer serials per student than they did in 1986. In 2002, ARL libraries acquired 830 serial subscriptions and 1,540 monographs per 1,000 students and the median number of volumes added was 3.89 per student, compared to the 4.18 volumes added per student in 1986. Libraries also reported fewer staff per student in 2002 as compared to 1986: in 2002, there was a median number of 13.2 total staff per 1,000 students, compared to the 1986 figure of 16 per 1,000.
34 This overall trend should not be interpreted as a rigid doubling, as it falsifies the varying experiences of individual libraries.
17
Graph 5 Resources per Student in ARL University Libraries, 1986-2002 Interlibrary Borrowing (+164%) 150%
100%
50%
% Change Since 1986 Volumes Held (+28%)
Vols. Added (-7%) 0% Serials Purchased (-8%) Total Staff (-18%) Monographs Purchased -50% (-28%) 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Source: ARL Statistics 2001-02 , Association of Research Libraries, Washington D.C.
18 THE TRENDS CONTINUE
In summation, purchases of fewer serials and monographs since 1986 coupled with increases in expenditures for these items indicate the continuing decline of the purchasing power of research libraries. Higher levels of service activities in interlibrary loan and library instruction services indicate increased focus on providing access to, rather than ownership of, library resources. The declining trends of reference and circulation services since 1996 serve as indicators of the changing and increasing complexity of library users' reliance on electronic resources and services.
The World Wide Web has revolutionized the way libraries are delivering services, enabling them to offer more value ranging from remote access to online catalogs, indexing and abstracting tools, and full-text resources delivered at the user's desktop. The delivery of new and innovative services through digitization projects and distance learning technologies is transforming the brick-and-mortar library model to a virtual model. We are still in the early stages of a long transition period where a hybrid model will reign.
These trends are largely due to the ready adoption of technological innovation and the gradual reduction of barriers to access. It is very likely that as the access model continues to offer more information at lesser cost to an increasing number of people, the ownership model may be reserved for the high-cost, low-usage information resources that are of value to smaller groups of people. Where would libraries fit into this environment? The only answer to this question can be at best speculative and at worst dead wrong.35
Library roles are being redefined as the research and academic community undergoes profound changes. The ARL Statistics and Measurement Program and its advisory ARL Committee on Statistics and Measurement continue to look for new ways to describe and measure the performance of research libraries and their contribution to teaching, research, learning, and community service. In a period of rapid technological change and fluctuation, the information gathered here represents only a basic and rudimentary picture of the major trends affecting research libraries, their resources, and their use.
This data compilation does not assess the quality of a library in meeting user needs, nor does it provide a picture of investments in electronic resources and other innovations. Answers to these questions can only be found by other measures. For example, by asking library users about their real needs and then designing better service delivery systems. ARL is engaged in a variety of projects through the New Measures Initiative that aim to assess the library’s impact on teaching, learning, and research, as well as the ability of libraries to control costs and add value to the services they provide. William Crowe captured the importance of the increased attention ARL libraries gave to measurement and assessment during the last decade by characterizing the movement as a ‘move beyond the rearview mirror approach.’36
One area of investigation in the New Measures agenda is the Higher Education Outcomes Research Review Project. The project's goal is to investigate strategies for assessing the library's value to the community and to explore the library's impact on learning, teaching, and research. The Learning Outcomes Working Group, established to promote the project objectives, is working to (a) identify assessment expertise on campuses, these can be people who are involved in the accreditation process at the institution level and/or departmental/professional level; (b) work with national campus-wide surveys to identify which ARL institutions have participated in these efforts; and (c) work with the Standardized Assessment of Information Literacy Skills (SAILS) research team at Kent State University for further development of an instrument to measure information literacy skills.
Another New Measures project is the LibQUAL+™ project, a partnership between ARL and Texas A&M; LibQUAL+™ results are proving to offer a promising testing ground for defining and measuring library service quality from a user perspective.37 As of May 2003, more than 400 institutions have participated in the LibQUAL+™ project, which started in 2000 with 12 ARL libraries. LibQUAL+™ is evolving into a suite of services offered to the
35 Steve Coffman, “Building Earth’s Largest Library: Driving into the Future,” Searcher 7, no. 3 (March 1999),
19 library community by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). Libraries can use these services to solicit, track, understand, and act upon users’ opinions of service quality. Results from the 2003 LibQUAL+™ implementation are available through a series of 11 volumes summarizing data from more than 125,000 users in 308 institutions. Participants in the spring 2003 survey included college and university, community college, health sciences, military, public and state libraries, as well as libraries in the U.K., the Netherlands, and Canada, where the instrument was translated into French.
Resource investments in electronic products are tracked through the ARL Supplementary Statistics and other pilot projects. The ARL E-Metrics project, which tests additional measures for electronic resources, is also providing further insights into the issues of defining and measuring use of electronic resources.38 Goals of the project are to (a) develop, test, and refine selected statistics and performance measures to describe electronic services and resources in ARL libraries; and (b) engage and support international collaboration in advancing the state of the art regarding the collection and dissemination of database vendors statistics. A pilot effort that currently includes more than 35 ARL member libraries is moving forward the first goal and ARL’s support of the international effort known as COUNTER is addressing the second goal of this project.39
In conclusion, those using the ARL Statistics to compare individual libraries should consult the extensive “Footnotes” section and the symbols in the “ARL Library Data Tables.” Although definitions used in the Statistics aim for consistency, differing reporting practices do exist. To aid comparability, Canadian library expenditures are expressed in U.S. dollars, at the rate of 1.56878 Canadian dollars to one U.S. dollar. This exchange rate is the average monthly noon exchange rate published in the Bank of Canada Review for the period July 2001–June 2002. Expenditures reported in Canadian dollars are given in the “Footnotes.”
The quantitative rank-order tables presented in this publication are not indicative of performance and outcomes and should not be used as measures of library quality. In comparing any individual library to ARL medians or to other libraries, one must be careful to make such comparisons within the context of differing institutional goals and local characteristics.
Martha Kyrillidou and Mark Young Association of Research Libraries June 12, 2003
38 See
20 ARL STATISTICS INTERACTIVE EDITION ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB
The ARL Statistics are available through an interactive edition on the Web, supplementing previously available data from 1992-93. Maintained and supported by the Geospatial and Statistical Data Center at the University of Virginia, this site offers researchers access to ARL Statistics with documentation.1
The site offers maps and graphics depicting current library trends. For the particularly adventurous, the site links to an interactive graphics and statistics page, allowing users to manipulate their data queries. One may chose univariate, bivariate, or multivariate statistics in addition to a vast array of selections with which to customize a query. The interactive pages also include options for regional aggregates, customized samples of observations, simple rank order tabulations of data, and the ability to create ratios of any two variables.
The site also includes membership index data (volumes held, volumes added gross, current serials, total library expenditures, and total staff), as published in the Chronicle of Higher Education each spring, which can be displayed as numbers or graphs. A link provides an explanation of how the ARL membership index is used in assessing new numbers and the table of formulas for calculating the index since 1986 is also included. These and other capabilities are located at:
< http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/arl/index.html >
The ARL Statistics datafiles from 1908 to 2002 can be retrieved in spreadsheet format from the ARL FTP site:
< ftp://www.arl.org/stat/machine >
The latest ARL membership index data can be found at:
< http://www.arl.org/stats/factor.html >
The ARL Statistics and Measurement Program website is located at:
< http://www.arl.org/stats >
1 For more information on the ARL Statistics Interactive Edition, see "To Describe and Measure the Performance of North American Research Libraries" by Martha Kyrillidou, IFLA Journal 27 (2001), 257-63.
21
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
COLLECTIONS
Volumes Volumes Volumes Monographs Current Current Current in Library Added Added Purchased Serials Serials Serials (Gross) (Net) (Volumes) Purchased Received Total
(Survey Question #) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
INSTITUTION Notes
ALABAMA LM+ 2,302,472 49,575 33,841 44,977 12,430 8,333 20,763 ALBERTA LM+ 5,768,464 151,540 144,082 U/A 22,837 14,208 37,045 ARIZONA bLM+ 4,918,178 112,668 94,975 52,152 26,711 6,571 33,282 ARIZONA STATE L+ 3,705,133 98,451 90,854 51,080 23,189 12,873 36,062 AUBURN b+ 2,672,386 45,129 43,975 17,541 12,282 19,983 32,265 BOSTON GLM+ 2,296,538 58,772 52,052 16,552 U/A U/A 29,551 BOSTON COLLEGE GL+ 1,970,143 69,486 65,205 U/A U/A U/A 21,416 BRIGHAM YOUNG L+ 3,304,688 79,337 71,013 51,023 13,984 7,007 20,991 BRITISH COLUMBIA LM+ 4,819,683 94,624 88,076 52,000 U/A U/A 35,343 BROWN + 3,191,502 65,645 60,048 39,877 17,353 2,712 20,065 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY GL+ 9,388,785 195,752 177,723 U/A U/A U/A 83,089 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS bLM+ 3,310,850 68,919 60,305 U/A U/A U/A 45,860 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE M+ 2,249,653 64,789 50,586 31,849 18,674 9,742 28,416 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES bLM+ 7,444,831 145,539 118,775 100,562 U/A U/A 79,552 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE G+ 2,141,065 62,066 59,919 37,239 13,710 7,613 21,323 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO GM+ 2,938,357 84,121 47,707 45,817 19,463 8,983 28,446 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA b+ 2,715,931 42,619 41,600 30,043 13,993 7,964 21,957 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LM+ 2,236,337 37,630 30,563 17,131 10,137 7,369 17,506 CHICAGO bLM+ 6,832,833 152,001 139,512 104,981 U/A U/A 41,029 CINCINNATI LM+ 2,874,157 88,691 73,852 51,959 33,223 1,392 34,615 COLORADO b+ 3,022,510 52,668 44,020 36,764 10,665 13,672 24,337 COLORADO STATE + 1,909,882 101,187 -23,398 35,929 7,746 12,966 20,712 COLUMBIA LM+ 7,557,346 173,993 156,930 88,677 44,854 10,104 54,958 CONNECTICUT BLM+ 3,105,039 71,887 59,446 27,490 24,402 10,861 35,263 CORNELL BL+ 6,963,879 172,700 156,632 U/A U/A U/A 62,077 DARTMOUTH M+ 2,399,692 54,267 31,869 25,423 22,292 3,008 25,300 DELAWARE + 2,540,162 49,498 48,149 35,248 8,062 5,479 13,541 DUKE GLM+ 5,234,338 109,430 102,522 64,357 34,744 2,251 36,995 EMORY BLM+ 2,705,123 61,344 51,777 37,766 34,016 5,785 39,801 FLORIDA BLM+ 3,950,350 105,885 96,086 70,637 25,473 2,681 28,154 FLORIDA STATE BLM+ 2,522,954 82,871 76,496 58,358 12,758 6,551 19,309 GEORGE WASHINGTON LM+ 2,043,942 38,881 28,002 20,737 U/A U/A 16,638 GEORGETOWN bLM+ 2,293,259 84,162 58,921 35,923 21,901 4,620 26,521 GEORGIA L+ 3,873,001 88,443 83,773 55,333 34,785 12,519 47,304 GEORGIA TECH + 2,258,892 63,183 62,558 5,653 8,881 12,367 21,248 GUELPH + 1,531,281 21,755 17,168 16,300 12,237 400 12,637 HARVARD LM+ 14,857,415 278,647 242,024 U/A U/A U/A 106,869 HAWAII b+ 3,234,973 69,952 54,590 24,937 17,514 9,814 27,328 HOUSTON L+ 2,173,342 56,091 50,085 31,749 U/A U/A 20,276 HOWARD LM+ 2,499,122 38,209 33,970 8,960 12,664 438 13,102 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO M+ 2,165,704 46,494 40,284 19,424 17,843 1,889 19,732 ILLINOIS, URBANA L + 9,861,988 158,740 152,844 107,075 U/A U/A 90,707
+ - See Footnotes G - Government documents not included in serials count U/A - Unavailable L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses N/A - Not Applicable M- Includes Medical library b – Basis of volume count is bibliographic
24 ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
COLLECTIONS
Microform Government Computer Archives Carto- Graphic Audio Video and Units Documents Files and graphic Materials Materials Film Manus. Materials
(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
3,832,832 1,280,207 5,167 29,368 299,564 190,495 21,914 4,106 ALABAMA 3,677,528 0 8,701 20,509 1,391,680 U/A U/A U/A ALBERTA 5,992,439 0 9,971 8,606 255,090 333,147 36,374 18,799 ARIZONA 7,322,247 788,712 7,485 18,252 215,582 1,132,156 58,761 27,813 ARIZONA STATE 2,557,163 390,171 1,746 9,296 147,027 73,202 6,444 2,092 AUBURN 4,170,322 U/A 1,026 40,614 1,700 17,700 51,314 836 BOSTON 3,829,735 202,492 1,233 6,390 17,655 112,668 14,600 10,081 BOSTON COLLEGE 3,342,028 409,102 U/A 18,683 245,480 18,163 145,883 15,703 BRIGHAM YOUNG 4,993,103 U/A 18,668 11,492 547,197 495,684 128,588 12,080 BRITISH COLUMBIA 1,844,033 0 4,952 9,313 140,901 923,787 68,594 4,367 BROWN 6,548,043 98,733 10,617 U/A 414,921 4,531,538 79,230 28,506 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 4,103,817 147,904 7,302 13,962 252,329 215,735 14,169 1,661 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 2,584,114 310,606 8,815 3,325 10,689 71,664 11,530 7,452 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 6,064,614 68,072 10,029 75,447 632,414 4,142,401 250,126 23,556 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 1,701,311 325,475 6,367 649 101,205 20,697 16,071 3,690 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 3,076,325 0 18,795 10,650 219,155 338,671 87,328 11,069 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 4,132,163 401,906 11,022 18,826 3,844,926 U/A 99,110 4,567 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2,475,337 23,920 5,655 1,722 64,000 72,531 29,202 15,032 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 2,871,791 U/A 4,955 28,640 416,596 0 35,323 2,025 CHICAGO 3,268,118 47,159 10,345 23,637 165,094 307,280 50,224 17,896 CINCINNATI 6,199,844 1,551,992 9,986 41,766 206,527 356,792 57,892 12,306 COLORADO 2,520,216 286,982 6,669 1,976 64,564 24,714 6,859 277 COLORADO STATE 5,592,973 190,029 U/A 214,875 134,476 638,156 U/A U/A COLUMBIA 4,405,678 7,755 3,386 22,417 232,001 3,046 55,179 8,609 CONNECTICUT 7,935,919 U/A 11,279 59,330 241,553 37,444 102,469 20,372 CORNELL 2,544,577 0 8,769 13,851 184,159 497,888 32,710 7,545 DARTMOUTH 3,307,290 432,134 13,858 3,758 125,599 804 1,764 13,747 DELAWARE 4,172,847 1,244,820 7,316 40,712 131,858 322,341 43,632 50,044 DUKE 4,560,136 136,705 5,360 14,698 25,937 2,812 27,861 15,653 EMORY 7,200,290 1,314,142 13,361 8,083 757,016 209,947 26,121 13,369 FLORIDA 6,872,780 928,459 7,311 4,435 169,395 905 44,741 9,970 FLORIDA STATE 2,720,684 0 1,087 18,040 14,847 155,521 13,762 19,621 GEORGE WASHINGTON 3,598,609 9,242 7,142 15,399 1,777 364,747 15,730 14,152 GEORGETOWN 6,336,813 1,030,971 12,350 47,601 618,716 912,308 113,670 124,189 GEORGIA 4,257,720 0 8,675 3,823 192,310 107,232 1,866 4,452 GEORGIA TECH 2,255,084 0 1,789 9,045 73,100 4,025 10,678 5,921 GUELPH 9,185,620 U/A U/A U/A U/A U/A U/A U/A HARVARD 5,972,239 0 3,445 6,622 252,026 2,581 28,193 25,190 HAWAII 4,023,252 680,971 1,933 3,774 5,348 525 4,590 4,244 HOUSTON 3,600,000 800 11,000 18,000 21 U/A 24,500 10,209 HOWARD 3,723,648 747,303 5,365 22,697 184,027 744,616 16,166 12,851 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 9,069,875 U/A 9,534 33,981 648,338 88,876 148,358 13,175 ILLINOIS, URBANA
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable
25 ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
COLLECTIONS
Volumes Volumes Volumes Monographs Current Current Current in Library Added Added Purchased Serials Serials Serials (Gross) (Net) (Volumes) Purchased Received Total
(Survey Question #) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
INSTITUTION Notes
INDIANA L+ 6,512,090 137,820 126,487 59,267 53,662 6,357 60,019 IOWA LM+ 4,302,594 128,793 92,131 76,997 29,914 19,214 49,128 IOWA STATE + 2,348,646 53,432 33,773 30,556 20,663 9,018 29,681 JOHNS HOPKINS bBM+ 3,509,413 72,628 58,186 44,279 20,413 9,610 30,023 KANSAS BLM+ 3,908,979 79,869 79,429 48,774 18,041 15,833 33,874 KENT STATE B+ 2,581,388 59,109 50,920 13,192 11,476 3,129 14,605 KENTUCKY LM+ 2,989,443 61,550 53,017 19,750 16,752 9,165 25,917 LAVAL LM+ 2,529,751 75,902 60,700 29,209 14,996 2,665 17,661 LOUISIANA STATE L+ 3,175,014 50,641 41,388 28,476 U/A U/A 24,304 LOUISVILLE BLM+ 1,833,386 69,189 68,248 48,248 15,948 80 16,028 MCGILL bBLM+ 3,360,591 90,944 79,094 38,186 17,673 4,840 22,513 MCMASTER M+ 1,911,064 28,001 22,090 14,700 11,208 6,393 17,601 MANITOBA GLM+ 2,036,069 76,053 66,885 19,480 U/A U/A 9,865 MARYLAND + 2,956,648 86,009 59,182 37,701 13,534 20,324 33,858 MASSACHUSETTS b+ 3,089,191 42,867 41,085 14,236 10,216 5,044 15,260 MIT + 2,667,215 47,403 44,061 18,554 11,715 10,643 22,358 MIAMI LM+ 2,399,584 68,843 54,463 23,124 15,426 3,981 19,407 MICHIGAN LM+ 7,643,203 182,670 158,860 103,002 33,426 35,792 69,218 MICHIGAN STATE + 4,503,950 95,548 83,742 42,609 14,735 14,735 29,470 MINNESOTA bLM+ 6,082,452 137,719 95,812 30,077 26,275 11,846 38,121 MISSOURI LM+ 3,111,319 42,509 36,477 13,931 10,820 5,253 16,073 MONTREAL LM+ 3,227,051 80,933 63,531 28,675 18,981 2,388 21,369 NEBRASKA L+ 2,720,838 56,908 50,792 18,698 12,777 9,886 22,663 NEW MEXICO bLM+ 2,473,170 66,721 61,674 27,958 11,483 6,124 17,607 NEW YORK LM+ 4,145,681 141,311 123,406 72,729 25,337 9,062 34,399 NORTH CAROLINA LM+ 5,366,141 146,018 131,268 75,282 27,943 21,006 48,949 NORTH CAROLINA STATE + 3,143,738 101,154 82,733 32,178 23,526 29,243 52,769 NORTHWESTERN BLM+ 4,217,321 85,218 67,173 43,312 U/A U/A 39,423 NOTRE DAME L+ 2,975,820 89,410 84,360 45,916 U/A U/A 25,448 OHIO BM+ 2,405,884 62,880 59,383 35,194 U/A U/A 28,581 OHIO STATE bLM+ 5,603,403 116,823 111,905 158,820 34,107 8,979 43,086 OKLAHOMA BLM+ 4,319,702 87,347 85,007 49,906 26,333 2,281 28,614 OKLAHOMA STATE BM+ 2,409,875 84,601 82,240 20,850 U/A U/A 24,806 OREGON L+ 2,548,402 61,547 58,243 33,199 12,043 5,797 17,840 PENNSYLVANIA LM+ 5,152,960 131,833 125,659 U/A U/A U/A 40,840 PENNSYLVANIA STATE BLM+ 4,699,670 93,443 84,721 74,982 37,512 18,758 56,270 PITTSBURGH BLM+ 4,339,324 100,891 89,718 U/A U/A U/A 41,908 PRINCETON G+ 6,104,279 123,615 114,678 92,129 31,219 1,227 32,446 PURDUE b+ 2,393,585 50,316 38,240 16,581 13,836 6,673 20,509 QUEEN'S bGLM+ 2,329,631 36,855 32,513 20,882 15,473 636 16,109 RICE + 2,240,044 55,784 47,732 34,815 14,807 18,402 33,209 ROCHESTER bM+ 3,150,464 50,512 38,832 19,225 21,282 958 22,240
+ - See Footnotes G - Government documents not included in serials count U/A - Unavailable L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses N/A - Not Applicable M- Includes Medical library b - Basis of volume count is bibliographic
26
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
COLLECTIONS
Microform Government Computer Archives Carto- Graphic Audio Video and Units Documents Files and graphic Materials Materials Film Manus. Materials
(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
4,670,049 0 6,132 35,016 594,981 2,979,377 252,801 38,106 INDIANA 6,958,388 669,820 18,582 15,141 386,055 229,353 27,415 15,415 IOWA 3,380,573 0 5,651 14,042 130,008 780,839 11,562 46,493 IOWA STATE 4,224,868 3,983 4,526 13,716 212,787 56,134 23,953 6,731 JOHNS HOPKINS 3,489,807 714,100 10,253 43,255 329,631 2,996,174 31,357 19,796 KANSAS 1,343,992 0 20,148 11,423 277,789 11,390 21,751 14,602 KENT STATE 6,202,256 1,128,997 6,252 24,981 250,226 567,024 44,401 38,321 KENTUCKY 1,310,267 0 2,674 0 327,094 207,575 18,417 16,597 LAVAL 5,375,405 624,193 3,951 20,919 299,443 U/A 21,999 2,789 LOUISIANA STATE 2,122,902 0 0 30,425 21,936 1,203,864 27,445 5,664 LOUISVILLE 1,626,988 680,484 4,007 2,565 239,983 256,108 44,435 31,242 MCGILL 1,548,150 0 896 11,980 143,622 10 29,429 1,268 MCMASTER 1,475,456 557,610 U/A 3,484 108,253 661,270 17,359 3,330 MANITOBA 5,473,621 182,876 5,053 32,499 221,363 101,777 152,376 29,516 MARYLAND 2,493,063 315,238 U/A 11,897 113,709 0 18,220 3,251 MASSACHUSETTS 2,357,872 0 11,245 17,625 118,534 456,240 25,078 3,753 MIT 3,750,839 0 4,378 16,122 43,145 1,793 43,998 7,350 MIAMI 8,027,897 0 64,932 35,574 339,292 5,473,462 45,510 32,638 MICHIGAN 5,556,525 0 19,744 2,370 230,498 1,817 56,522 1,369 MICHIGAN STATE 5,985,607 2,641,938 14,325 72,610 420,912 U/A U/A U/A MINNESOTA 6,766,615 1,655,520 1,947 9,659 270,729 606 18,159 1,224 MISSOURI 1,684,156 11,510 7,963 0 13,212 126,208 39,944 11,619 MONTREAL 4,508,410 552,672 5,017 8,238 161,461 75,417 32,082 1,809 NEBRASKA 4,628,643 307,484 14,175 18,678 227,214 1,567,577 46,316 9,114 NEW MEXICO 4,796,088 499,289 4,645 25,569 19 1,132,830 58,572 23,432 NEW YORK 4,734,753 1,617,891 9,449 31,011 311,979 613,973 157,143 47,386 NORTH CAROLINA 5,006,819 0 73,815 7,969 39,428 99,497 3,260 16,630 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 4,110,673 7,600 8,128 12,070 202,456 382,580 53,684 19,153 NORTHWESTERN 3,638,191 0 4,307 U/A 15,477 U/A 18,607 6,223 NOTRE DAME 3,152,947 0 10,328 12,596 174,478 96,478 51,578 29,017 OHIO 5,569,978 40,559 7,275 28,093 213,031 2,204,556 46,705 U/A OHIO STATE 4,046,819 8,581 2,909 17,058 154,421 404,287 3,595 7,081 OKLAHOMA 4,493,010 131,638 12,548 6,928 296,679 191,131 9,818 12,920 OKLAHOMA STATE 2,887,172 481,414 1,217 61,573 730,983 1,147,465 65,217 9,212 OREGON 3,875,003 U/A 8,332 9,500 131,610 707,054 55,385 6,011 PENNSYLVANIA 5,066,834 0 7,391 23,058 463,566 520,528 69,279 152,259 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 4,446,110 U/A 7,780 19,516 105,308 695,122 46,752 18,165 PITTSBURGH 6,145,305 735,816 4,665 31,847 309,843 28,321 59,722 1,593 PRINCETON 2,518,849 488,464 7,537 2,710 342,657 1,126 933 10,674 PURDUE 3,652,395 1,172,175 U/A U/A 155,402 27,435 U/A U/A QUEEN'S 2,990,617 55,920 12,549 5,155 26,700 30,871 35,174 8,103 RICE 4,998,630 486,769 5,722 13,710 101,974 6,670 80,442 5,398 ROCHESTER
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable
27
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
COLLECTIONS
Volumes Volumes Volumes Monographs Current Current Current in Library Added Added Purchased Serials Serials Serials (Gross) (Net) (Volumes) Purchased Received Total
(Survey Question #) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
INSTITUTION Notes
RUTGERS BL+ 3,979,219 82,451 60,289 31,992 U/A U/A 35,960 SASKATCHEWAN LM+ 1,884,974 62,054 41,997 22,526 6,856 4,405 11,261 SOUTH CAROLINA LM+ 3,333,764 56,390 50,015 21,562 U/A U/A 21,836 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BLM+ 3,730,085 70,327 64,051 36,522 22,979 6,898 29,877 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS LM+ 2,748,990 40,662 31,337 21,718 15,308 2,159 17,467 STANFORD BLM+ 7,698,099 168,272 134,575 110,353 U/A U/A 50,056 SUNY-ALBANY B+ 2,054,677 46,353 41,151 17,886 28,920 2,449 31,369 SUNY-BUFFALO LM+ 3,287,867 57,636 31,736 21,657 17,679 14,500 32,179 SUNY-STONY BROOK M+ 2,136,801 30,314 26,523 17,925 25,814 2,649 28,463 SYRACUSE L+ 2,865,922 39,756 34,430 23,097 15,811 3,038 18,849 TEMPLE bBGLM+ 2,738,286 61,163 58,387 31,406 12,565 5,375 17,940 TENNESSEE bBLM+ 2,816,914 61,436 45,272 30,380 20,063 2,854 22,917 TEXAS GL+ 8,229,689 167,786 155,059 61,624 22,915 27,099 50,014 TEXAS A&M bBM+ 2,924,918 93,171 80,539 39,931 30,459 11,845 42,304 TEXAS TECH BLM+ 2,299,286 72,918 60,679 40,145 20,240 11,903 32,143 TORONTO BLM+ 9,525,835 247,553 225,721 156,402 45,376 8,558 53,934 TULANE BGLM+ 2,331,250 48,438 46,221 30,752 14,141 857 14,998 UTAH LM+ 2,991,692 86,075 82,137 U/A 30,062 3,455 33,517 VANDERBILT LM+ 2,746,052 67,318 56,472 44,471 22,391 7,442 29,833 VIRGINIA LM+ 4,867,833 101,692 88,564 45,960 26,695 29,148 55,843 VIRGINIA TECH + 2,137,042 55,276 38,968 25,684 11,859 4,820 16,679 WASHINGTON LM+ 6,274,025 153,979 112,384 38,912 U/A U/A 45,587 WASHINGTON STATE B+ 2,116,080 38,386 33,881 22,863 U/A U/A 31,718 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS LM+ 3,547,866 71,805 61,787 28,477 18,057 259 18,316 WATERLOO + 1,961,373 31,491 10,843 18,687 U/A U/A 15,251 WAYNE STATE bLM+ 3,296,271 55,092 38,473 24,446 U/A U/A 18,645 WESTERN ONTARIO L+ 2,838,293 42,859 42,587 20,256 19,291 1,628 20,919 WISCONSIN LM+ 6,216,006 97,569 80,772 54,625 40,022 7,641 47,663 YALE LM+ 10,905,851 201,227 198,581 140,595 60,034 9,630 69,664 YORK BL+ 2,436,581 70,034 51,348 32,123 U/A U/A 18,988
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY + 7,178,362 217,907 147,356 102,922 U/A U/A 29,642 CANADA INST. FOR SCITECH. + 8,066,487 40,059 33,601 2,991 U/A U/A 11,500 CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBS. bG+ 2,152,517 13,905 13,905 2,240 U/A U/A U/A LIBRARY OF CONGRESS L+ 25,586,139 362,696 361,285 142,726 46,319 53,681 100,000 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. B+ 2,364,878 17,878 13,445 3,705 5,363 13,716 19,079 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA + 7,992,123 U/A 325,150 7,162 1,541 34,507 36,048 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE + 2,425,403 43,919 40,919 14,428 19,765 4,349 24,114 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY G+ 8,200,975 173,701 173,701 88,273 19,309 15,397 34,706 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY + 2,536,680 35,283 32,570 12,409 6,883 6,029 12,912 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BG+ 1,491,818 25,451 20,687 7,079 3,610 3,418 7,028
+ - See Footnotes G - Government documents not included in serials count U/A - Unavailable L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses N/A - Not Applicable M- Includes Medical library b - Basis of volume count is bibliographic
28
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
COLLECTIONS
Microform Government Computer Archives Carto- Graphic Audio Video and Units Documents Files and graphic Materials Materials Film Manus. Materials
(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
5,792,405 2,651,256 12,298 22,836 U/A U/A U/A U/A RUTGERS 3,035,173 402,056 2,281 268 72,165 18,538 14,784 1,635 SASKATCHEWAN 5,008,383 876,308 3,035 7,783 312,950 250,000 33,953 11,977 SOUTH CAROLINA 6,038,707 487,581 4,442 44,903 U/A 3,180,060 26,817 21,023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 4,442,331 313,172 8,929 23,789 334,058 20,616 28,856 13,337 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 5,444,678 0 9,965 102,643 279,531 799,191 321,947 40,753 STANFORD 2,810,863 0 658 5,705 51,483 54,964 6,551 4,801 SUNY-ALBANY 5,322,129 U/A 6,446 7,400 200,400 130,970 44,420 7,200 SUNY-BUFFALO 3,810,919 316,311 2,809 6,715 131,053 10,788 35,148 6,081 SUNY-STONY BROOK 7,114,070 217,928 24,472 31,033 272,332 494,508 397,062 20,152 SYRACUSE 2,981,969 93,928 2,850 34,180 116,285 10,023,877 20,220 2,918 TEMPLE 3,956,872 1,803 1,479 9,710 389,689 124,792 29,762 12,913 TENNESSEE 6,083,600 0 6,097 111,932 338,582 9,483,471 159,926 20,624 TEXAS 5,304,146 65,519 9,789 23,232 203,609 283,399 15,690 19,787 TEXAS A&M 2,392,533 4,222 11,229 16,004 152,290 808,256 13,537 19,221 TEXAS TECH 5,094,957 0 5,608 33,631 279,873 693,060 189,288 23,125 TORONTO 2,534,540 606,816 3,003 38,437 10,920 397,779 86,367 6,037 TULANE 3,543,837 857,681 8,081 40,554 229,120 1,139,316 39,131 23,225 UTAH 2,923,802 250,693 6,854 13,111 107,020 221,539 29,847 7,494 VANDERBILT 5,435,023 681,643 18,912 26,020 148,443 434,510 60,070 23,960 VIRGINIA 6,234,735 399,525 10,461 15,147 136,405 80,849 9,159 10,541 VIRGINIA TECH 7,387,734 0 12,080 64,278 350,192 1,101,605 69,836 21,050 WASHINGTON 4,662,429 U/A U/A 17,922 1,507 351,080 12,698 30,763 WASHINGTON STATE 3,226,960 U/A 10,969 13,821 116,645 130,242 37,305 32,117 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1,672,413 0 1,249 4,340 150,662 U/A 1,022 110 WATERLOO 3,785,487 388,182 4,301 76,500 53,929 2,150,039 45,985 24,146 WAYNE STATE 3,760,416 0 2,015 9,436 15,327 345,347 52,538 4,058 WESTERN ONTARIO 4,804,382 294,205 10,327 55,197 519,682 3,010,137 217,726 16,630 WISCONSIN 6,452,750 1,145,757 U/A 64,034 453,519 2,264,597 208,615 6,939 YALE 3,957,861 0 1,798 9,404 110,752 8,647 46,362 16,753 YORK
6,536,442 1,730,894 4,087 U/A U/A U/A 57,939 39,048 BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY U/A 0 17,070 N/A N/A N/A N/A 467 CANADA INST. FOR SCITECH. 1,677,831 0 313 0 0 0 0 0 CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBS. 13,532,501 N/A 80,050 56,107 4,863,681 14,103,741 2,676,572 899,561 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 1,078,365 0 1,675 18,867 4,506 1,104 401 3,779 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. 7,438,836 3,521,085 164 7,410 U/A 97,009 229,119 12,847 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA 578,338 0 2,138 2,408 0 56,962 U/A 70,739 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE 6,528,425 8,038 U/A 35,556 428,309 4,277,889 554,237 51,006 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY 7,472,086 N/A 6,805 27,495 205,309 70,069 50 30 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY 189,305 0 484 2,110 58 20 158 105 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable
29
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
SUMMARY DATA: COLLECTIONS
Volumes Volumes Volumes Monographs Current Current Current in Library Added Added Purchased Serials Serials Serials (Gross) (Net) (Volumes) Purchased Received Total
(Survey Question #) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
Median 2,990,568 71,066 60,169 33,199 18,366 6,953 28,455
High 14,857,415 278,647 242,024 158,820 60,034 35,792 106,869
Low 1,531,281 21,755 -23,398 5,653 6,856 80 9,865
Totals 432,126,694 9,738,743 8,294,028 4,420,179 1,809,912 734,109 3,649,644
Number of Libraries Responding 114 114 114 105 86 86 114
NONUNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
Median 4,857,521 40,059 37,260 9,786 6,883 13,716 24,114
Totals 67,995,382 930,799 1,162,619 383,935 102,790 131,097 275,029
Number of Libraries Responding 10 9 10 10 7 7 9
GRAND TOTALS 500,122,076 10,669,542 9,456,647 4,804,114 1,912,702 865,206 3,924,673
30
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
SUMMARY DATA: COLLECTIONS
Microform Government Computer Archives Carto- Graphic Audio Video and Units Documents Files and graphic Materials Materials Film Manus.Materials
(8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (Survey Question #)
UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
4,121,418 182,876 7,289 16,063 192,310 229,353 35,249 12,306 Median
9,185,620 2,651,256 73,815 214,875 3,844,926 10,023,877 397,062 152,259 High
1,310,267 0 0 0 19 0 933 110 Low
494,551,803 38,883,891 925,351 2,644,811 28,443,111 81,528,915 6,102,543 1,761,851 Totals
Number of 114 103 106 110 111 105 108 107 Libraries Responding
NONUNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
6,528,425 0 2,138 13,139 4,506 63,516 29,170 8,313 Median
45,032,129 5,260,017 112,786 149,953 5,501,863 18,606,794 3,518,476 1,077,582 Totals
Number of 9 8 9 8 7 8 8 10 Libraries Responding
539,583,932 44,143,908 1,038,137 2,794,764 33,944,974 100,135,709 9,621,019 2,839,433 GRAND TOTALS
31
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
EXPENDITURES
Monographs Current Other Misc. Total Contract Serials Library Materials Library Binding Materials Materials
(Survey Question #) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21)
INSTITUTION Notes
ALABAMA LM+ 1,313,676 4,716,022 5,310 36,384 6,071,392 130,824 ALBERTA LM+ 2,608,391 5,405,949 U/A 434,632 8,448,971 123,918 ARIZONA bLM+ 2,711,852 7,010,579 479,718 939,519 11,141,668 204,648 ARIZONA STATE L+ 2,695,988 5,828,774 334,726 195,065 9,054,553 179,731 AUBURN b+ 970,195 3,768,945 43,810 37,206 4,820,156 75,903 BOSTON GLM+ 830,438 5,228,186 386,650 6,788 6,452,062 180,457 BOSTON COLLEGE GL+ 1,568,139 5,025,050 173,050 95,577 6,861,816 168,278 BRIGHAM YOUNG L+ 1,801,102 5,530,637 122,013 76,164 7,529,916 204,930 BRITISH COLUMBIA LM+ 1,851,852 5,965,549 307,408 690,456 8,815,266 123,269 BROWN + 1,979,182 4,020,542 268,012 315,644 6,583,380 268,994 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY GL+ 8,329,979 9,738,625 102,242 U/A 18,170,846 966,946 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS bLM+ 2,100,887 5,706,231 425,425 152,539 8,385,082 237,238 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE M+ 2,046,894 4,603,523 U/A 0 6,650,417 197,176 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES bLM+ 4,610,594 7,314,602 1,297,876 438,308 13,661,380 596,023 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE G+ 1,245,644 2,460,367 201,285 8,017 3,915,313 225,164 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO GM+ 2,318,636 5,065,145 183,386 9,447 7,576,614 333,385 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA b+ 1,947,514 3,518,997 U/A 111,503 5,578,014 102,808 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LM+ 924,969 4,093,523 52,628 83,488 5,154,608 97,407 CHICAGO bLM+ 4,369,169 7,330,130 119,084 0 11,818,383 435,747 CINCINNATI LM+ 2,071,415 5,136,240 565,034 258,765 8,031,454 170,202 COLORADO b+ 1,637,656 5,412,392 425,599 772,382 8,248,029 195,930 COLORADO STATE + 1,768,217 3,299,597 82,719 754,864 5,905,397 141,394 COLUMBIA LM+ 6,718,479 8,001,285 U/A 0 14,719,764 894,383 CONNECTICUT BLM+ 1,209,300 4,693,019 1,390,325 46,028 7,338,672 315,337 CORNELL BL+ 5,172,481 6,757,494 1,327,872 245,730 13,503,577 228,236 DARTMOUTH M+ 1,812,826 3,433,584 1,644,300 0 6,890,710 210,100 DELAWARE + 2,138,417 3,930,768 63,613 303,870 6,436,668 91,835 DUKE GLM+ 3,695,533 7,454,293 90,988 807,524 12,048,338 287,458 EMORY BLM+ 3,554,196 4,650,272 2,634,275 384,390 11,223,133 169,006 FLORIDA BLM+ 2,520,517 7,213,651 1,000,326 414,123 11,148,617 387,476 FLORIDA STATE BLM+ 1,322,913 4,689,196 208,691 515,692 6,736,492 198,457 GEORGE WASHINGTON LM+ 2,143,369 4,910,840 160,973 880,367 8,095,549 127,008 GEORGETOWN bLM+ 1,656,381 5,104,409 741,249 254,541 7,756,580 238,480 GEORGIA L+ 2,273,930 6,762,378 185,337 376,095 9,597,740 261,753 GEORGIA TECH + 545,932 3,203,529 814,934 0 4,564,395 91,505 GUELPH + 509,341 1,835,326 6,370 230,812 2,581,849 36,342 HARVARD LM+ 8,846,163 9,792,111 6,574,413 433,869 25,646,556 1,201,004 HAWAII b+ 1,567,274 4,107,900 60,258 0 5,735,432 244,183 HOUSTON L+ 1,627,745 3,687,359 882,031 443,170 6,640,305 96,726 HOWARD LM+ 504,125 3,273,201 188,081 279,211 4,244,618 74,256 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO M+ 1,316,109 5,473,463 19,619 0 6,809,191 102,080 ILLINOIS, URBANA L+ 3,623,267 6,653,869 188,683 1,164,932 11,630,751 247,217
+ - See Footnotes G - Government documents not included in serials count U/A - Unavailable L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses N/A - Not Applicable M- Includes Medical library b - Basis of volume count is bibliographic
32
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
EXPENDITURES
Salaries Salaries Salaries Total Other Total & Wages: & Wages: & Wages: Salaries Operating Library Professional Support Student Asst. & Wages Expenditures Expenditures
(22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
2,465,353 1,460,340 557,394 4,483,087 1,963,787 12,649,090 ALABAMA 2,774,316 4,894,287 622,873 8,291,476 1,293,575 18,157,941 ALBERTA 4,915,018 4,732,132 852,364 10,499,514 3,588,023 25,433,853 ARIZONA 4,534,725 5,461,071 800,011 10,795,807 2,774,640 22,804,731 ARIZONA STATE 2,261,436 1,340,979 341,564 3,943,979 1,850,585 10,690,623 AUBURN 4,510,852 2,923,552 537,825 7,972,229 2,018,379 16,623,127 BOSTON 3,997,794 2,647,122 752,559 7,397,475 1,208,057 15,635,626 BOSTON COLLEGE 5,802,354 1,422,957 2,323,168 9,548,479 2,277,724 19,561,049 BRIGHAM YOUNG 4,664,035 4,869,469 866,788 10,400,292 2,977,473 22,316,300 BRITISH COLUMBIA 4,159,970 3,017,646 387,443 7,565,059 1,901,042 16,318,475 BROWN 7,758,581 15,095,370 3,337,206 26,191,157 6,320,082 51,649,031 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 3,603,841 5,091,492 1,106,514 9,801,847 2,528,724 20,952,891 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3,904,975 4,340,579 1,398,760 9,644,314 2,016,278 18,508,185 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 9,608,222 10,400,766 2,751,440 22,760,428 5,247,323 42,265,154 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 3,131,608 2,181,835 583,242 5,896,685 2,071,826 12,108,988 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 4,793,860 6,575,404 1,236,542 12,605,806 4,611,309 25,127,114 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2,794,560 4,273,254 1,100,310 8,168,124 2,396,177 16,245,123 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 3,022,480 1,394,150 446,958 4,863,588 1,617,273 11,732,876 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 3,837,543 5,836,787 1,002,238 10,676,568 3,204,585 26,135,283 CHICAGO 4,875,228 2,467,098 1,041,889 8,384,215 2,539,633 19,125,504 CINCINNATI 2,656,329 4,182,804 1,000,373 7,839,506 2,000,673 18,284,138 COLORADO 2,422,871 2,453,001 629,028 5,504,900 1,575,467 13,127,158 COLORADO STATE 10,188,651 7,178,892 1,260,763 18,628,306 4,871,654 39,114,107 COLUMBIA U/A U/A 921,654 10,146,477 2,333,030 20,133,516 CONNECTICUT 8,295,217 9,623,216 845,327 18,763,760 6,132,231 38,627,804 CORNELL 2,970,384 3,053,133 413,780 6,437,297 6,557,176 20,095,283 DARTMOUTH 3,045,843 2,733,110 475,237 6,254,190 1,139,594 13,922,287 DELAWARE 6,856,436 4,751,319 558,365 12,166,120 6,088,156 30,590,072 DUKE 4,617,952 5,261,171 637,111 10,516,234 21,032,468 42,940,841 EMORY 5,022,020 5,188,741 782,211 10,992,972 2,581,324 25,110,389 FLORIDA 2,550,635 2,377,229 566,226 5,494,090 1,265,378 13,694,417 FLORIDA STATE 4,148,890 2,913,156 700,909 7,762,955 3,851,363 19,836,875 GEORGE WASHINGTON 4,290,923 4,128,224 786,658 9,205,805 2,432,477 19,633,342 GEORGETOWN 3,688,943 5,078,236 887,650 9,654,829 2,031,182 21,545,504 GEORGIA 2,258,673 1,422,879 85,801 3,767,353 1,455,474 9,878,727 GEORGIA TECH 1,280,940 1,846,275 156,665 3,283,880 519,648 6,421,718 GUELPH 31,180,373 19,101,792 1,419,888 51,702,053 17,904,086 96,453,699 HARVARD 2,886,323 2,679,703 984,529 6,550,555 1,804,240 14,334,410 HAWAII 2,801,636 1,874,418 612,269 5,288,323 1,999,082 14,024,436 HOUSTON 2,687,323 1,979,948 504,274 5,171,545 869,445 10,359,864 HOWARD 3,890,670 4,256,438 468,058 8,615,166 2,451,422 17,977,859 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 8,606,144 6,770,616 1,529,265 16,906,025 3,758,345 32,542,338 ILLINOIS, URBANA
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable
33
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
EXPENDITURES
Monographs Current Other Misc. Total Contract Serials Library Materials Library Binding Materials Materials
(Survey Question #) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21)
INSTITUTION Notes
INDIANA L+ 3,055,731 6,591,730 1,340,174 328,691 11,316,326 337,446 IOWA LM+ 2,178,262 5,646,530 1,741,456 573,383 10,139,631 180,448 IOWA STATE + 1,906,642 5,518,683 126,305 318,854 7,870,484 202,308 JOHNS HOPKINS bBM+ 2,269,740 6,598,133 866,103 1,119,562 10,853,538 158,699 KANSAS BLM+ 2,136,573 4,720,237 116,678 302,912 7,276,400 163,455 KENT STATE B+ 903,169 2,231,579 68,875 15,607 3,219,230 97,239 KENTUCKY LM+ 2,402,151 6,109,621 507,825 838,996 9,858,593 162,522 LAVAL LM+ 1,792,151 2,755,310 47,546 0 4,595,007 U/A LOUISIANA STATE L+ 1,274,754 4,013,329 255,528 80,933 5,624,544 69,724 LOUISVILLE BLM+ 1,716,575 5,760,695 622,161 0 8,099,431 133,360 MCGILL bBLM+ 2,788,130 3,559,177 1,503,429 125,669 7,976,405 124,530 MCMASTER M+ 769,377 3,774,539 U/A 16,129 4,560,045 118,651 MANITOBA GLM+ 796,799 2,899,362 U/A 301,295 3,997,457 101,581 MARYLAND + 1,935,870 4,063,748 1,134,239 805,145 7,939,002 157,940 MASSACHUSETTS b+ 561,590 3,086,318 68,370 57,701 3,773,979 170,203 MIT + 1,110,051 4,902,513 U/A 29,642 6,042,206 209,966 MIAMI LM+ 1,195,590 5,765,840 363,900 231,511 7,556,841 136,767 MICHIGAN LM+ 6,032,483 11,033,976 524,372 619,567 18,210,398 430,887 MICHIGAN STATE + 2,036,235 5,434,509 U/A 128,505 7,599,249 241,920 MINNESOTA bLM+ 2,187,740 6,479,640 369,546 1,359,621 10,396,547 401,841 MISSOURI LM+ 1,451,102 4,690,259 112,392 1,015 6,254,768 175,917 MONTREAL LM+ 1,394,183 4,943,369 U/A 75,893 6,413,445 139,063 NEBRASKA L+ 951,491 4,310,312 193,279 64,398 5,519,480 167,520 NEW MEXICO bLM+ 1,468,783 4,023,724 94,291 68,806 5,655,604 155,330 NEW YORK LM+ 3,637,121 7,541,571 710,916 127,635 12,017,243 580,406 NORTH CAROLINA LM+ 3,639,224 5,548,162 2,029,802 56,130 11,273,318 327,150 NORTH CAROLINA STATE + 1,620,222 5,271,494 231,817 657,490 7,781,023 153,439 NORTHWESTERN BLM+ 3,088,300 5,075,484 383,037 1,539,216 10,086,037 198,568 NOTRE DAME L+ 3,013,265 4,320,976 796,496 510,555 8,641,292 150,359 OHIO BM+ 1,315,181 2,592,632 992,557 44,816 4,945,186 112,269 OHIO STATE bLM+ 3,288,279 8,205,882 U/A U/A 11,494,161 329,966 OKLAHOMA BLM+ 2,631,199 4,593,699 1,228,480 362,699 8,816,077 166,946 OKLAHOMA STATE BM+ 897,706 2,829,998 119,558 1,189,240 5,036,502 48,017 OREGON L+ 1,551,306 3,589,580 U/A 705,587 5,846,473 156,098 PENNSYLVANIA LM+ 3,222,105 7,941,747 471,604 U/A 11,635,456 414,659 PENNSYLVANIA STATE BLM+ 3,454,023 7,456,595 3,294,928 416,280 14,621,826 524,401 PITTSBURGH BLM+ 2,909,731 7,542,247 327,930 283,995 11,063,903 331,713 PRINCETON G+ 5,039,889 4,989,337 1,657,597 132,859 11,819,682 531,949 PURDUE b+ 1,051,696 4,963,111 U/A 0 6,014,807 121,394 QUEEN'S bGLM+ 1,029,991 3,772,161 19,061 41,500 4,862,714 99,452 RICE + 2,721,258 4,359,726 1,301,758 391,618 8,774,360 73,247 ROCHESTER bM+ 940,044 4,039,504 187,821 44,747 5,212,116 103,881
+ - See Footnotes G - Government documents not included in serials count U/A - Unavailable L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses N/A - Not Applicable M- Includes Medical library b - Basis of volume count is bibliographic
34
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
EXPENDITURES
Salaries Salaries Salaries Total Other Total & Wages: & Wages: & Wages: Salaries Operating Library Professional Support Student Asst. & Wages Expenditures Expenditures
(22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
7,212,677 4,262,492 1,599,656 13,074,825 5,337,981 30,066,578 INDIANA 5,030,679 4,271,577 1,119,089 10,421,345 2,194,266 22,935,690 IOWA 2,451,904 3,271,140 650,606 6,373,650 1,094,369 15,540,811 IOWA STATE 5,513,220 5,404,904 657,635 11,575,759 4,110,274 26,698,270 JOHNS HOPKINS 5,169,926 2,872,872 805,410 8,848,208 2,040,538 18,328,601 KANSAS 3,348,076 1,763,253 913,944 6,025,273 1,402,384 10,744,126 KENT STATE 4,774,014 2,752,342 1,054,148 8,580,504 2,031,488 20,633,107 KENTUCKY 2,194,143 3,495,122 44,431 5,733,696 363,676 10,692,379 LAVAL 2,870,745 2,098,310 663,180 5,632,235 1,436,976 12,763,479 LOUISIANA STATE 2,532,403 2,075,539 450,347 5,058,289 2,603,274 15,894,354 LOUISVILLE 2,578,272 3,577,483 544,058 6,699,813 1,715,706 16,516,454 MCGILL 1,271,129 2,546,034 116,431 3,933,593 570,202 9,182,491 MCMASTER 2,145,887 2,826,946 262,202 5,235,036 851,302 10,185,375 MANITOBA 6,706,474 3,673,313 857,315 11,237,102 2,573,327 21,907,371 MARYLAND 3,405,792 2,847,588 672,555 6,925,935 535,854 11,405,971 MASSACHUSETTS 5,231,876 3,044,338 256,038 8,532,252 2,152,818 16,937,242 MIT 3,365,409 2,491,215 930,054 6,786,678 2,120,414 16,600,700 MIAMI 7,538,696 9,853,621 1,914,611 19,306,928 5,409,403 43,357,616 MICHIGAN 3,386,016 4,485,198 1,310,940 9,182,154 2,437,642 19,460,965 MICHIGAN STATE 6,431,100 7,842,048 1,815,804 16,088,952 5,556,407 32,443,747 MINNESOTA 2,538,763 2,796,653 427,370 5,762,786 1,776,733 13,970,204 MISSOURI 3,542,643 5,268,713 24,116 8,835,471 932,325 16,320,305 MONTREAL 2,552,991 2,569,375 579,594 5,701,960 1,025,364 12,414,324 NEBRASKA 4,127,948 4,578,646 1,002,470 9,709,064 2,698,342 18,218,340 NEW MEXICO 6,859,114 7,866,688 977,151 15,702,953 4,752,987 33,053,589 NEW YORK 6,922,398 5,210,696 1,331,462 13,464,556 3,077,681 28,142,705 NORTH CAROLINA 5,419,139 3,054,028 737,831 9,210,998 7,562,295 24,707,755 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 5,611,963 4,010,079 820,999 10,443,041 1,935,126 22,662,772 NORTHWESTERN 3,526,621 4,345,423 572,213 8,444,257 1,220,130 18,456,038 NOTRE DAME 3,069,954 2,228,475 697,686 5,996,115 1,305,314 12,358,884 OHIO 6,202,692 5,170,022 1,728,761 13,101,475 2,896,565 27,822,167 OHIO STATE 2,576,767 1,459,106 833,083 4,868,956 1,022,244 14,874,223 OKLAHOMA 2,883,225 1,391,136 547,645 4,822,006 1,778,096 11,684,621 OKLAHOMA STATE 2,839,102 3,000,539 940,516 6,780,157 1,282,988 14,065,716 OREGON 6,221,788 6,086,704 1,393,568 13,702,060 4,899,689 30,651,864 PENNSYLVANIA 6,768,494 12,313,557 991,636 20,073,687 4,724,710 39,944,624 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 4,851,550 4,174,133 837,847 9,863,530 2,986,611 24,245,757 PITTSBURGH 7,692,808 6,104,511 499,763 14,297,082 4,357,566 31,006,279 PRINCETON 3,081,108 2,888,689 660,776 6,630,573 3,208,467 15,975,241 PURDUE 1,457,513 2,689,329 195,989 4,342,831 897,191 10,202,188 QUEEN'S 3,271,954 1,409,717 158,023 4,839,694 1,611,711 15,299,012 RICE 4,174,023 1,695,169 402,651 6,271,843 2,207,441 13,795,281 ROCHESTER
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable
35
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
EXPENDITURES
Monographs Current Other Misc. Total Contract Serials Library Materials Library Binding Materials Materials
(Survey Question #) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21)
INSTITUTION Notes
RUTGERS BL+ 1,701,381 6,418,420 599,296 504,680 9,223,777 216,509 SASKATCHEWAN LM+ 1,059,527 2,558,729 U/A 83,410 3,701,666 66,192 SOUTH CAROLINA LM+ 1,627,394 4,132,494 202,999 138,445 6,101,332 126,553 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BLM+ 1,651,663 5,702,245 1,549,287 1,118,463 10,021,658 209,782 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS LM+ 1,026,680 4,915,339 227,403 433,663 6,603,085 154,328 STANFORD BLM+ 5,233,920 11,866,219 583,868 5,258 17,689,265 780,889 SUNY-ALBANY B+ 923,304 3,498,383 72,337 226,145 4,720,169 75,007 SUNY-BUFFALO LM+ 1,327,023 5,241,768 332,956 148,248 7,049,995 141,285 SUNY-STONY BROOK M+ 795,244 4,030,617 895,957 283,034 6,004,852 78,633 SYRACUSE L+ 950,553 3,496,444 10,496 272,485 4,729,978 71,350 TEMPLE bBGLM+ 1,219,904 4,106,876 821,005 4,430 6,152,215 167,292 TENNESSEE bBLM+ 1,865,985 5,958,573 75,988 426,610 8,327,156 146,247 TEXAS GL+ 3,546,093 6,907,879 2,268,585 829 12,723,386 213,519 TEXAS A&M bBM+ 2,645,399 5,187,041 2,011,523 158,528 10,002,491 196,236 TEXAS TECH BLM+ 1,836,434 5,261,367 256,157 341,156 7,695,114 147,823 TORONTO BLM+ 5,536,693 7,632,483 2,155,948 0 15,325,123 336,593 TULANE BGLM+ 1,436,996 3,990,306 101,258 496,530 6,025,090 157,920 UTAH LM+ 2,062,695 4,311,192 22,303 527,343 6,923,533 207,649 VANDERBILT LM+ 1,792,444 6,157,611 U/A 59,900 8,009,955 212,028 VIRGINIA LM+ 2,025,021 5,487,724 1,175,353 203,759 8,891,857 201,057 VIRGINIA TECH + 1,340,306 4,401,708 70,707 464,389 6,277,110 127,327 WASHINGTON LM+ 2,217,936 8,847,747 U/A 61,660 11,127,343 219,326 WASHINGTON STATE B+ 1,125,200 4,731,660 47,874 107,032 6,011,766 86,350 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS LM+ 1,676,341 4,483,368 122,636 2,257,696 8,540,041 165,304 WATERLOO + 766,573 2,827,508 84,311 156,697 3,835,088 57,447 WAYNE STATE bLM+ 1,662,347 4,835,922 U/A 303,789 6,802,058 101,321 WESTERN ONTARIO L+ 937,560 4,779,190 U/A 388,508 6,105,258 113,493 WISCONSIN LM+ 2,461,277 5,945,987 557,887 100,054 9,065,205 204,760 YALE LM+ 7,606,829 6,711,332 8,497,012 0 22,815,173 542,194 YORK BL+ 1,299,157 3,458,185 211,568 17,910 4,986,820 119,859
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY + 3,293,512 1,010,433 397,519 62,694 4,764,158 85,917 CANADA INST. FOR SCITECH. + 380,113 7,632,846 U/A 31,669 8,044,628 N/A CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBS. bG+ 81,691 193,164 545,798 23,182 843,835 0 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS L+ U/A U/A U/A U/A 16,327,528 1,465,563 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. B+ 208,912 2,168,237 2,719 0 2,379,868 2,236 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA + 318,023 409,229 568,968 62,924 1,359,143 9,029 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE + 1,175,640 4,410,866 215,517 0 5,802,023 194,184 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY G+ 6,273,548 4,600,608 2,284,550 U/A 13,158,706 569,462 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY + 954,229 2,091,216 U/A 0 3,045,445 32,922 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BG+ 362,492 1,078,582 48,892 68,960 1,558,926 44,769
+ - See Footnotes G - Government documents not included in serials count U/A - Unavailable L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses N/A - Not Applicable M- Includes Medical library b - Bibliographic count
36
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
EXPENDITURES
Salaries Salaries Salaries Total Other Total & Wages: & Wages: & Wages: Salaries Operating Library Professional Support Student Asst. & Wages Expenditures Expenditures
(22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
7,113,228 8,824,457 1,632,639 17,570,324 1,489,348 28,499,958 RUTGERS 1,671,347 2,001,554 238,082 3,910,984 690,130 8,368,971 SASKATCHEWAN 3,565,877 3,142,257 508,297 7,216,431 3,558,691 17,003,007 SOUTH CAROLINA 6,771,045 4,535,455 1,592,912 12,899,412 4,412,774 27,543,626 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 2,834,275 2,780,396 1,092,474 6,707,145 853,326 14,317,884 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 22,635,182 11,736,924 2,853,851 37,225,957 13,627,975 69,324,086 STANFORD 3,202,563 2,218,727 617,074 6,038,364 1,330,113 12,163,653 SUNY-ALBANY 6,400,213 1,739,689 765,838 8,905,740 1,725,170 17,822,190 SUNY-BUFFALO 2,841,469 2,277,615 544,183 5,663,267 908,567 12,655,319 SUNY-STONY BROOK 2,972,257 3,514,840 491,090 6,978,187 1,568,317 13,347,832 SYRACUSE 3,649,174 1,878,060 487,273 6,014,507 1,566,078 13,900,092 TEMPLE 4,048,264 3,302,844 798,933 8,150,041 1,746,333 18,369,777 TENNESSEE 7,506,440 9,178,019 1,421,886 18,106,345 5,436,811 36,480,061 TEXAS 5,256,027 3,344,493 967,223 9,567,743 3,322,612 23,089,082 TEXAS A&M 3,920,427 2,167,905 1,029,817 7,118,149 2,641,733 17,602,819 TEXAS TECH 8,363,595 9,295,022 2,409,296 20,067,914 5,037,464 40,767,095 TORONTO 2,853,464 2,169,974 384,333 5,407,771 1,347,723 12,938,504 TULANE 3,807,046 5,371,783 1,469,264 10,648,093 4,003,259 21,782,534 UTAH 4,384,418 3,363,991 418,751 8,167,160 2,354,208 18,743,351 VANDERBILT 6,511,385 8,485,734 788,927 15,786,046 3,746,075 28,625,035 VIRGINIA 2,043,479 2,508,213 671,179 5,222,871 1,214,655 12,841,963 VIRGINIA TECH 9,087,177 6,443,675 2,211,039 17,741,891 2,479,399 31,567,959 WASHINGTON 2,510,107 2,942,148 607,351 6,059,606 791,219 12,948,941 WASHINGTON STATE 5,411,536 3,801,332 602,300 9,815,168 7,807,922 26,328,435 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1,577,113 2,132,219 386,457 4,095,788 748,871 8,737,195 WATERLOO 4,521,632 2,812,702 1,590,425 8,924,759 4,536,385 20,364,523 WAYNE STATE 1,923,193 2,205,410 341,077 4,469,680 312,164 11,000,594 WESTERN ONTARIO 9,878,930 6,125,494 2,487,056 18,491,480 5,839,991 33,601,436 WISCONSIN 12,291,973 9,169,145 926,591 22,387,709 13,976,734 59,721,810 YALE 2,767,782 2,688,704 468,059 5,924,545 923,194 11,954,418 YORK
9,846,707 10,030,948 593,668 20,471,323 7,402,969 32,724,367 BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY U/A U/A U/A 9,850,273 9,154,781 27,049,682 CANADA INST. FOR SCITECH. 1,184,556 431,811 176,167 1,792,534 571,408 3,207,777 CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBS. U/A U/A U/A 265,186,000 258,411,909 541,391,000 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 6,455,931 1,858,193 21,408 8,335,532 5,030,768 15,748,404 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. 9,218,854 6,537,191 86,245 15,842,290 7,663,512 24,873,974 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA 12,491,265 3,515,385 591,964 16,598,614 20,848,445 43,443,266 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE 27,345,834 U/A 2,374,223 29,720,057 9,926,955 53,375,180 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY U/A U/A U/A 7,043,940 1,458,660 11,580,967 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY 3,792,677 1,951,502 0 5,744,179 1,530,698 8,878,572 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable
37
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
SUMMARY DATA: EXPENDITURES
Monographs Current Other Misc. Total Contract SerialsLibrary Materials Library Binding Materials Materials
(Survey Question #) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21)
UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
Median 1,806,964 4,953,240 327,930 226,145 7,587,932 168,278
High 8,846,163 11,866,219 8,497,012 2,257,696 25,646,556 1,201,004
Low 504,125 1,835,326 5,310 0 2,581,849 36,342
Totals 255,184,279 593,238,907 70,522,858 35,455,955 954,401,999 25,168,718
Number of Libraries Responding 114 114 97 111 114 113
NONUNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
Median 380,113 2,091,216 397,519 27,426 3,904,802 44,769
Totals 13,048,159 23,595,181 4,063,963 249,429 57,284,260 2,404,082
Number of Libraries Responding 9 9 7 8 10 9
GRAND TOTALS 268,232,438 616,834,088 74,586,821 35,705,385 1,011,686,259 27,572,800
38
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
SUMMARY DATA: EXPENDITURES
Salaries Salaries Salaries Total Other Total & Wages: & Wages: & Wages: Salaries Operating Library Professional Support Student Asst. & Wages Expenditures Expenditures
(22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (Survey Question #)
UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
3,904,975 3,302,844 774,025 8,414,236 2,173,542 18,306,370 Median
31,180,373 19,101,792 3,337,206 51,702,053 21,032,468 96,453,699 High
1,271,129 1,340,979 24,116 3,283,880 312,164 6,421,718 Low
545,435,540 487,206,095 102,076,411 1,143,942,869 353,755,527 2,477,269,114 Totals
Number of 113 113 114 114 114 114 Libraries Responding
NONUNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
9,218,854 2,733,444 176,167 12,846,282 7,533,240 25,961,828 Median
70,335,824 24,325,030 3,843,675 380,584,743 322,000,105 762,273,189 Totals
Number of 7 6 7 10 10 10 Libraries Responding
615,771,364 511,531,125 105,920,086 1,524,527,612 675,755,632 3,239,542,303 GRAND TOTALS
39
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Professional Support Student Total Library Participants Staff Staff Assistants Staff Presentations in Group (FTE) (FTE) (FTE) (FTE) to Groups * Presentations *
(Survey Question #) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33)
INSTITUTION Notes
ALABAMA LM+ 56 79 53 188 373 6,317 ALBERTA LM+ 82 216 32 330 805 17,435 ARIZONA bLM+ 106 172 84 362 2,195 34,166 ARIZONA STATE L+ 102 214 46 362 682 14,486 AUBURN b+ 53 63 34 150 711 15,390 BOSTON GLM+ 94 113 114 321 699 8,628 BOSTON COLLEGE GL+ 69 85 55 209 737 13,391 BRIGHAM YOUNG L+ 116 57 177 350 2,613 39,982 BRITISH COLUMBIA LM+ 115 220 56 391 1,377 26,276 BROWN + 81 100 36 217 168 U/A CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY GL+ 254 239 194 687 2,666 26,811 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS bLM+ 59 173 61 293 795 10,198 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE M+ 69 134 76 279 673 15,082 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES bLM+ 142 281 178 601 1,282 19,499 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE G+ 40 96 34 170 686 6,377 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO GM+ 76 195 70 341 1,648 11,094 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA b+ 49 137 52 238 675 11,026 CASE WESTERN RESERVE LM+ 59 56 27 142 373 4,321 CHICAGO bLM+ 71 209 64 344 366 8,071 CINCINNATI LM+ 89 92 81 262 954 7,732 COLORADO b+ 51 119 66 236 2,335 16,188 COLORADO STATE + 45 75 26 146 500 11,726 COLUMBIA LM+ 196 260 79 535 818 10,813 CONNECTICUT BLM+ 78 90 66 234 812 11,399 CORNELL BL+ 133 320 137 590 1,615 22,575 DARTMOUTH M+ 57 118 31 206 U/A U/A DELAWARE + 54 110 51 215 407 8,108 DUKE GLM+ 128 170 45 343 1,023 12,432 EMORY BLM+ 90 160 39 289 630 14,349 FLORIDA BLM+ 118 212 77 407 837 17,019 FLORIDA STATE BLM+ 64 127 50 241 558 10,647 GEORGE WASHINGTON LM+ 70 128 42 240 471 9,514 GEORGETOWN bLM+ 80 125 47 252 1,002 13,647 GEORGIA L+ 87 213 64 364 603 10,994 GEORGIA TECH + 49 59 5 113 196 4,227 GUELPH + 34 79 17 130 273 5,327 HARVARD LM+ 528 657 122 1,307 U/A U/A HAWAII b+ 56 89 69 214 284 3,590 HOUSTON L+ 66 95 44 205 369 6,408 HOWARD LM+ 54 81 50 185 384 3,527 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO M+ 82 156 36 274 706 10,859 ILLINOIS, URBANA L+ 176 222 124 522 1,212 19,492
+ - See Footnotes G - Govt. documents Not Included in Serials Count L - Includes Law Library B - Includes Branch Campuses M- Includes Medical Library b - Basis of volume count is bibliographic U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable * - Figures in italics are derived from a sampling method rather than an actual annual count
40
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Reference Initial Total ILL/DD Transactions * Circulation Circulation Total Items Total Items Transactions Transactions Loaned Borrowed
(34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
99,389 U/A U/A 9,993 16,366 ALABAMA 139,461 U/A 969,058 107,831 41,218 ALBERTA 81,487 458,240 772,590 37,984 29,583 ARIZONA 179,371 416,361 1,113,873 48,280 29,196 ARIZONA STATE 106,480 175,170 179,789 18,490 9,359 AUBURN 92,091 263,968 365,119 14,373 23,510 BOSTON 55,484 209,400 323,328 18,028 10,803 BOSTON COLLEGE 391,727 668,487 759,322 31,439 30,079 BRIGHAM YOUNG 187,452 818,143 4,575,975 34,909 36,312 BRITISH COLUMBIA 54,032 207,560 243,307 16,306 17,949 BROWN 136,053 901,757 U/A 24,893 14,722 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 118,054 310,256 476,800 38,650 29,480 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 85,996 211,583 405,191 27,603 23,726 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 198,597 730,691 1,928,758 66,372 30,520 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 36,169 186,001 258,272 20,819 16,820 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 105,129 454,288 649,222 37,588 24,360 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 101,712 274,208 420,424 24,921 31,958 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 43,929 119,630 153,134 59,272 44,199 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 55,425 446,059 698,152 38,117 19,110 CHICAGO 136,138 352,886 482,683 82,828 52,655 CINCINNATI 207,162 483,015 763,108 45,332 26,804 COLORADO 92,792 288,875 474,171 27,577 47,920 COLORADO STATE 251,330 446,371 1,087,448 44,856 20,441 COLUMBIA 113,331 U/A 221,780 44,613 38,187 CONNECTICUT 128,005 U/A 1,125,464 27,663 19,005 CORNELL U/A U/A U/A 11,010 21,540 DARTMOUTH 180,606 U/A 349,030 11,991 17,905 DELAWARE 100,656 333,188 520,209 49,768 16,909 DUKE 79,534 243,802 451,770 37,304 19,538 EMORY 145,974 446,500 1,129,493 49,622 21,839 FLORIDA 84,152 313,019 416,011 16,728 16,010 FLORIDA STATE 92,630 201,492 238,343 30,296 45,602 GEORGE WASHINGTON 101,638 313,209 392,891 13,608 10,847 GEORGETOWN 121,448 326,719 454,658 44,479 9,237 GEORGIA 41,705 105,639 U/A 10,942 3,146 GEORGIA TECH 30,475 197,943 404,737 35,131 80,584 GUELPH U/A U/A 1,989,796 46,196 22,677 HARVARD 90,234 393,009 464,704 6,614 6,758 HAWAII 74,783 250,201 356,959 29,194 18,260 HOUSTON 180,000 U/A 74,525 11,017 4,102 HOWARD 114,562 217,409 470,747 95,043 35,055 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 245,322 U/A 1,052,627 92,763 91,494 ILLINOIS, URBANA
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable * - Figures in italics are derived from a sampling method rather than an actual annual count
41
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Professional Support Student Total Library Participants Staff Staff Assistants Staff Presentations in Group (FTE) (FTE) (FTE) (FTE) to Groups * Presentations *
(Survey Question #) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33)
INSTITUTION Notes
INDIANA L+ 139 187 132 458 1,989 31,735 IOWA LM+ 91 133 84 308 573 11,697 IOWA STATE + 52 97 49 198 1,003 9,053 JOHNS HOPKINS bBM+ 114 171 53 338 636 6,316 KANSAS BLM+ 103 118 80 301 712 11,820 KENT STATE B+ 69 63 86 218 724 12,263 KENTUCKY LM+ 98 126 81 305 1,746 55,009 LAVAL LM+ 59 151 3 213 462 7,346 LOUISIANA STATE L+ 64 85 56 205 1,224 11,148 LOUISVILLE BLM+ 50 91 37 178 900 11,310 MCGILL bBLM+ 68 153 46 267 1,023 13,949 MCMASTER M+ 32 111 18 161 662 8,767 MANITOBA GLM+ 51 128 15 194 950 7,818 MARYLAND + 124 113 59 296 1,008 21,075 MASSACHUSETTS b+ 56 74 40 170 360 5,822 MIT + 94 95 17 206 243 5,624 MIAMI LM+ 78 125 39 242 1,517 11,062 MICHIGAN LM+ 167 347 129 643 1,097 21,349 MICHIGAN STATE + 63 128 93 284 478 13,338 MINNESOTA bLM+ 107 211 105 423 1,025 19,490 MISSOURI LM+ 56 133 33 222 718 11,023 MONTREAL LM+ 95 246 4 345 2,401 14,855 NEBRASKA L+ 48 112 43 203 362 9,141 NEW MEXICO bLM+ 81 148 69 298 1,274 19,006 NEW YORK LM+ 120 243 64 427 945 13,345 NORTH CAROLINA LM+ 140 206 83 429 1,072 20,848 NORTH CAROLINA STATE + 120 126 48 294 540 12,638 NORTHWESTERN BLM+ 112 146 82 340 576 7,077 NOTRE DAME L+ 60 168 42 270 413 6,436 OHIO BM+ 62 75 63 200 861 17,770 OHIO STATE bLM+ 126 181 126 433 1,069 17,104 OKLAHOMA BLM+ 55 84 61 200 447 7,230 OKLAHOMA STATE BM+ 56 79 67 202 993 20,080 OREGON L+ 53 97 65 215 404 8,610 PENNSYLVANIA LM+ 119 178 106 403 871 14,916 PENNSYLVANIA STATE BLM+ 151 399 87 637 2,281 44,622 PITTSBURGH BLM+ 108 152 84 344 1,668 22,096 PRINCETON G+ 133 210 28 371 U/A U/A PURDUE b+ 62 143 58 263 422 6,562 QUEEN'S bGLM+ 39 120 17 176 602 8,808 RICE + 52 62 13 127 226 2,197 ROCHESTER bM+ 89 69 50 208 642 9,212
+ - See Footnotes G - Govt. documents not included in serials count L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses M- Includes Medical library b - Basis of volume count is bibliographic U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable * - Figures in italics are derived from a sampling method rather than an actual annual count
42
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Reference Initial Total ILL/DD Transactions * Circulation Circulation Total Items Total Items Transactions Transactions Loaned Borrowed
(34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
446,836 695,587 1,629,476 108,902 31,157 INDIANA 111,515 U/A 638,363 46,863 23,493 IOWA 44,327 292,390 334,123 22,370 15,169 IOWA STATE 124,707 278,659 509,910 29,021 30,395 JOHNS HOPKINS 121,436 728,004 818,708 43,463 32,402 KANSAS 73,979 233,973 321,523 22,731 12,626 KENT STATE 101,309 278,403 346,759 38,690 29,408 KENTUCKY 168,514 429,378 675,960 21,694 16,554 LAVAL 97,747 225,179 286,873 10,252 25,026 LOUISIANA STATE 100,760 284,710 U/A 27,389 11,195 LOUISVILLE 142,042 490,788 906,853 15,672 53,313 MCGILL 71,793 240,997 405,797 21,115 16,039 MCMASTER 94,617 509,283 610,443 16,475 25,126 MANITOBA 141,120 569,876 569,876 37,185 20,750 MARYLAND 70,985 255,207 447,794 25,517 17,084 MASSACHUSETTS 64,282 226,799 350,144 12,474 11,114 MIT 114,864 128,610 201,541 43,246 18,807 MIAMI 218,066 593,189 1,105,876 67,805 30,988 MICHIGAN 68,805 356,978 875,627 44,033 32,752 MICHIGAN STATE 182,418 427,553 633,090 214,465 24,731 MINNESOTA 74,880 264,324 330,314 54,734 44,305 MISSOURI 73,128 646,918 1,019,665 19,689 19,466 MONTREAL 67,672 241,817 319,059 20,260 15,584 NEBRASKA 79,077 335,784 409,297 21,726 20,377 NEW MEXICO 177,793 729,000 988,453 19,172 24,288 NEW YORK 214,931 U/A 1,193,737 51,784 14,418 NORTH CAROLINA 89,828 266,650 459,742 12,559 21,339 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 110,971 233,158 347,421 27,946 31,228 NORTHWESTERN 29,694 193,753 269,355 28,759 13,644 NOTRE DAME 111,659 348,352 454,804 46,688 48,090 OHIO 349,500 522,609 2,005,481 105,513 88,876 OHIO STATE 90,827 199,227 241,393 25,196 32,228 OKLAHOMA 91,170 223,980 275,181 35,540 20,629 OKLAHOMA STATE 80,630 349,640 437,091 51,348 40,140 OREGON 271,808 372,699 418,549 23,686 30,641 PENNSYLVANIA 293,314 819,152 880,756 58,528 49,450 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 276,943 464,465 538,302 43,298 17,429 PITTSBURGH U/A 393,436 493,468 12,589 10,977 PRINCETON 94,237 186,011 519,064 24,365 28,503 PURDUE 39,773 371,819 581,310 15,346 15,409 QUEEN'S U/A 136,766 203,988 9,599 8,349 RICE 65,119 173,987 311,963 26,871 19,542 ROCHESTER
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable * - Figures in italics are derived from a sampling method rather than an actual annual count
43
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Professional Support Student Total Library Participants Staff Staff Assistants Staff Presentations in Group (FTE) (FTE) (FTE) (FTE) to Groups * Presentations *
(Survey Question #) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33)
INSTITUTION Notes
RUTGERS BL+ 106 240 95 441 1,072 20,742 SASKATCHEWAN LM+ 47 108 12 167 488 7,705 SOUTH CAROLINA LM+ 78 118 96 292 870 12,679 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BLM+ 105 127 107 339 884 12,203 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS LM+ 51 103 82 236 733 6,959 STANFORD BLM+ 314 262 96 672 854 10,984 SUNY-ALBANY B+ 64 76 46 186 857 6,064 SUNY-BUFFALO LM+ 126 55 68 249 636 14,963 SUNY-STONY BROOK M+ 46 70 47 163 757 9,554 SYRACUSE L+ 61 143 42 246 604 9,758 TEMPLE bBGLM+ 69 92 54 215 490 7,906 TENNESSEE bBLM+ 89 149 63 301 737 13,380 TEXAS GL+ 140 327 94 561 1,239 40,511 TEXAS A&M bBM+ 104 173 83 360 878 12,529 TEXAS TECH BLM+ 85 118 90 293 962 16,485 TORONTO BLM+ 188 363 147 698 1,613 24,643 TULANE BGLM+ 55 106 38 199 436 7,015 UTAH LM+ 75 192 98 365 1,887 53,020 VANDERBILT LM+ 100 113 43 256 504 6,548 VIRGINIA LM+ 94 197 58 349 1,895 15,686 VIRGINIA TECH + 39 98 57 194 865 18,653 WASHINGTON LM+ 152 222 132 506 1,227 20,006 WASHINGTON STATE B+ 51 90 36 177 715 11,301 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS LM+ 100 134 51 285 641 3,898 WATERLOO + 39 99 36 174 182 3,523 WAYNE STATE bLM+ 100 104 105 309 847 17,476 WESTERN ONTARIO L+ 58 112 15 185 757 16,533 WISCONSIN LM+ 190 192 131 513 2,056 24,569 YALE LM+ 226 349 62 637 1,001 8,990 YORK BL+ 58 115 47 220 623 13,611
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY + 222 250 N/A 472 7,830 146,274 CANADA INST. FOR SCITECH. + 167 141 8 316 743 743 CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBS. bG+ 23 19 10 52 5 205 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS L+ 1,415 2,735 5 4,155 809 25,356 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. B+ 109 55 1 165 195 65,797 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA + 239 262 6 507 751 16,883 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE + 184 88 27 299 319 5,690 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY G+ 290 346 131 767 U/A U/A NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY + 66 98 3 167 300 1,941 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BG+ 59 64 0 123 N/A N/A
+ - See Footnotes G - Govt. documents not included in serials count L - Includes Law library B - Includes branch campuses M- Includes Medical library b - Bibliographic count U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable * - Figures in italics are derived from a sampling method rather than an actual annual count
44
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Reference Initial Total ILL/DD Transactions * Circulation Circulation Total Items Total Items Transactions Transactions Loaned Borrowed
(34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (Survey Question #)
INSTITUTION
149,606 330,760 716,061 12,285 16,123 RUTGERS 53,525 332,734 430,983 18,307 21,306 SASKATCHEWAN 228,778 872,054 923,940 21,095 26,403 SOUTH CAROLINA 56,933 457,353 707,493 15,028 12,103 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 111,880 243,897 457,128 49,741 32,193 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 112,343 641,800 774,457 16,392 12,522 STANFORD 71,692 114,160 175,433 12,830 15,132 SUNY-ALBANY 124,500 379,504 425,262 35,166 14,696 SUNY-BUFFALO 88,085 U/A 264,898 22,547 10,006 SUNY-STONY BROOK 95,910 174,598 213,346 11,983 16,900 SYRACUSE 92,100 197,782 268,288 17,496 11,957 TEMPLE 93,047 315,809 364,096 38,867 30,914 TENNESSEE 365,823 1,151,052 2,074,840 35,789 23,173 TEXAS 80,058 798,028 1,411,052 33,413 27,140 TEXAS A&M 63,445 192,294 374,709 44,554 38,954 TEXAS TECH 450,837 1,446,802 1,943,402 28,539 9,052 TORONTO 42,149 152,255 228,137 27,428 22,506 TULANE 394,359 275,703 525,079 54,750 16,879 UTAH 67,958 217,808 321,754 31,092 12,384 VANDERBILT 182,007 431,559 858,728 44,235 29,439 VIRGINIA 26,590 258,684 311,907 42,654 28,574 VIRGINIA TECH 73,008 U/A 2,241,080 91,326 19,561 WASHINGTON 46,632 206,583 351,810 31,438 18,158 WASHINGTON STATE 99,941 243,607 403,542 25,279 33,840 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 43,513 276,250 579,581 78,630 41,599 WATERLOO 675,092 173,338 238,273 47,554 17,750 WAYNE STATE 100,408 448,060 703,813 21,557 6,354 WESTERN ONTARIO U/A 714,580 977,955 104,406 45,829 WISCONSIN 133,045 432,865 901,841 34,478 18,497 YALE 154,956 604,286 1,049,581 13,330 4,813 YORK
1,320,727 1,917,098 2,476,715 40,635 7,070 BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY 17,194 22,805 29,646 773,172 23,572 CANADA INST. FOR SCITECH. U/A U/A 54,952 25,058 U/A CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBS. 1,097,845 161,439 U/A 23,667 55 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 18,931 5,422 6,757 17,265 19,727 NATL. AGRICULTURAL LIB. 21,748 129,041 U/A 35,419 753 NATL. LIBRARY OF CANADA 97,549 N/A N/A 269,012 419 NATL. LIBRARY OF MEDICINE U/A U/A U/A 2,779 2,074 NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY 87,630 40,586 42,936 32,484 2,428 NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY 42,212 39,076 240,665 10,675 10,027 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
U/A - Unavailable N/A - Not Applicable * - Figures in italics are derived from a sampling method rather than an actual annual count
45
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
SUMMARY DATA: PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Professional Support Student Total Library Participants Staff Staff Assistants Staff Presentations in Group (FTE) (FTE) (FTE) (FTE) to Groups Presentations
(Survey Question #) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33)
UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
Median 79 127 58 272 757 11,712
High 528 657 194 1,307 2,666 55,009
Low 32 55 3 113 168 2,197
Totals 10,704 17,327 7,457 35,488 99,942 1,556,584
Number of Libraries Responding 114 114 114 114 111 110
NONUNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
Median 176 120 6 308 531 11,287
Totals 2,774 4,058 191 7,023 10,952 262,889
Number of Libraries Responding 10 10 9 10 8 8
GRAND TOTALS 13,478 21,385 7,648 42,511 110,894 1,819,473
46
ARL LIBRARY DATA TABLES, 2001-02
SUMMARY DATA: PERSONNEL AND PUBLIC SERVICES
Reference Initial Total ILL/DD Transactions Circulation Circulation Total Items Total Items Transactions Transactions Loaned Borrowed
(34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (Survey Question #)
UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
100,656 313,209 464,704 29,108 21,323 Median
675,092 1,446,802 4,575,975 214,465 91,494 High
26,590 105,639 74,525 6,614 3,146 Low
14,401,811 38,568,394 72,799,066 4,207,190 2,853,583 Totals
Number of 109 101 109 114 114 Libraries Responding
NONUNIVERSITY LIBRARIES:
64,921 40,586 48,944 28,771 2,428 Median
2,703,836 2,315,467 2,851,671 1,230,166 66,125 Totals
Number of 8 7 6 10 9 Libraries Responding
17,105,647 40,883,861 75,650,737 5,437,356 2,919,708 GRAND TOTALS
47
ANALYSIS OF SELECTED VARIABLES OF ARL UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES, 2001-02
The percentages and ratios below are select indicators that describe the condition of ARL university libraries. The high and low figures indicate the range, while the mean and median indicate the central tendency of the distributions for ARL university libraries. Note that a distribution is normal when the mean and the median figures are identical. If the mean is larger than the median then the distribution is positively skewed, and if the opposite is true the distribution is negatively skewed.
Number of libraries Category High Mean Median Low reporting
1. Professional Staff as percent of Total Staff 50.60 29.82 29.13 19.88 114
2. Support Staff as percent of Total Staff 71.30 48.91 49.53 16.29 114
3. Student Assistant Staff as percent of Total Staff 50.57 21.28 21.12 1.16 114
4. Ratio of Professional to Support Staff (excluding Student 2.29 0.66 0.61 0.29 114 Assistant Staff)
5. Ratio of Items Loaned to Items Borrowed 8.67 1.64 1.33 0.29 114
6. Serial Expenditures as percent of 82.77 65.05 66.80 29.42 114 Total Library Materials Expenditures
7. Monograph Expenditures as percent of Total Library 45.84 25.13 24.35 11.88 114 Materials Expenditures
8. Total Library Materials Expenditures 59.27 40.46 40.04 25.52 114 as percent of Total Library Expenditures
9. Contract Binding 2.29 0.98 0.91 0.39 113 as percent of Total Library Expenditures
10. Salary and Wages Expenditures 61.65 45.62 46.10 24.49 114 as percent of Total Library Expenditures
11. Other Operating Expenditures 48.98 12.95 12.20 2.84 114 as percent of Total Library Expenditures
12. Unit cost of monographs (per volume) 121.63 52.98 50.35 20.70 105
13. Unit cost of serials (per subscription) 507.49 266.82 259.21 111.79 86
14. Library Expenditures per Faculty 49,311.71 16,151.04 13,276.23 6,846.43 114
15. Library Expenditures per Full-Time Student 5,541.94 1,243.12 875.84 392.39 114
16. Library Expenditures per Full-Time Graduate Student 16,115.53 5,299.05 4,761.71 1,948.93 114
17. Library Expenditures per Full-Time User* 3,425.61 901.28 710.11 347.15 114
18. Library Expenditures per User** 3,220.55 715.98 539.04 246.78 113
* “Full-time user” category includes full-time students, full-time graduate students, and all faculty. ** “User” category Includes all students, all graduate students, and all faculty.
48
PH.D., FACULTY, AND ENROLLMENT STATISTICS *
ENROLLMENTS
Ph.D.s Ph.D. Faculty Total FTE Total Graduate FTE Graduate Awarded Fields Full-time** Part-time** Full-time Part-time
(Survey Question #) (39) (40) (41) (42) (43) (44) (45) INSTITUTION
ALABAMA 127 44 812 16,152 3,019 2,637 1,328 ALBERTA 242 119 1,425 27,961 4,285 3,049 1,956 ARIZONA 369 82 1,425 28,848 6,899 5,523 2,692 ARIZONA STATE 247 46 1,981 38,056 14,703 6,693 5,785 AUBURN 132 40 1,115 19,241 3,228 2,145 1,405 BOSTON 183 38 2,428 22,728 5,028 7,128 3,026 BOSTON COLLEGE 120 30 653 11,392 2,915 2,132 2,378 BRIGHAM YOUNG 71 29 1,501 28,401 4,370 1,864 1,092 BRITISH COLUMBIA 325 77 1,795 27,032 10,307 5,423 1,193 BROWN 148 30 558 7,342 432 1,665 110 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 910 82 1,399 28,514 2,615 6,828 1,032 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 336 59 1,630 24,314 2,978 5,586 350 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 173 42 1,123 20,696 1,189 3,725 437 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 612 81 1,855 35,879 1,615 10,950 395 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 116 37 870 13,918 511 1,670 45 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 275 64 1,439 19,897 381 2,642 131 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 290 38 830 19,452 921 2,462 187 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 166 63 562 6,783 2,433 3,666 2,169 CHICAGO 332 75 1,297 10,537 2,346 6,488 2,320 CINCINNATI 175 80 1,778 20,491 6,399 4,738 2,276 COLORADO 258 44 1,251 22,947 6,174 1,565 3,558 COLORADO STATE 148 41 995 19,549 3,857 1,740 1,767 COLUMBIA 357 74 1,401 16,935 2,776 9,088 1,808 CONNECTICUT 221 53 1,036 18,773 5,278 3,191 2,196 CORNELL 380 83 1,627 19,420 0 5,619 0 DARTMOUTH 40 15 717 5,452 141 1,424 90 DELAWARE 136 40 1,049 17,360 3,589 2,171 771 DUKE 201 41 901 11,602 324 5,456 169 EMORY 118 25 2,212 10,761 839 2,938 430 FLORIDA 607 81 2,955 39,939 6,576 10,016 2,860 FLORIDA STATE 244 72 1,084 28,583 6,879 4,268 2,049 GEORGE WASHINGTON 95 28 1,011 14,176 8,008 5,465 6,656 GEORGETOWN 80 19 1,091 11,396 1,292 5,205 1,061 GEORGIA 343 87 1,875 27,677 4,640 5,387 2,101 GEORGIA TECH 257 28 762 13,877 1,698 3,714 818 GUELPH 68 U/A 685 14,301 1,544 1,638 103 HARVARD 383 75 1,956 18,884 5,586 11,824 3,009 HAWAII 141 55 1,136 12,654 4,878 2,665 2,813 HOUSTON 205 53 917 21,972 11,035 5,079 4,386 HOWARD 78 26 1,150 9,301 1,189 2,830 690 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 174 54 1,707 20,208 4,747 6,123 2,945 ILLINOIS, URBANA 567 84 1,830 34,688 3,542 7,064 2,420 INDIANA 347 86 1,655 32,764 5,199 4,885 2,921
* - Figures were reported on the ARL Questionnaire and have not been verified with the U.S. NCES IPEDS survey ** - Includes both undergraduate and graduate students U/A – Unavailable
49
PH.D., FACULTY, AND ENROLLMENT STATISTICS *
ENROLLMENTS
Ph.D.s Ph.D. Faculty Total FTE Total Graduate FTE Graduate Awarded Fields Full-time** Part-time** Full-time Part-time
(Survey Question #) (39) (40) (41) (42) (43) (44) (45) INSTITUTION
IOWA 306 67 1,185 22,662 6,106 5,474 3,691 IOWA STATE 232 82 1,644 23,964 3,859 2,732 2,031 JOHNS HOPKINS 348 66 1,151 9,105 8,721 4,101 7,881 KANSAS 248 67 1,638 22,548 5,642 4,534 3,594 KENT STATE 127 21 846 23,020 10,528 2,019 2,510 KENTUCKY 196 56 1,330 24,277 7,417 4,124 2,640 LAVAL 226 52 1,440 22,855 12,078 4,387 2,567 LOUISIANA STATE 222 54 1,299 26,896 4,506 3,023 1,851 LOUISVILLE 65 27 1,344 13,759 6,635 3,917 2,346 MCGILL 327 80 1,357 22,551 5,354 5,817 1,881 MCMASTER 93 37 979 15,101 3,656 1,837 712 MANITOBA 88 47 1,189 17,651 5,967 1,801 716 MARYLAND 430 70 2,766 27,844 6,316 5,432 3,629 MASSACHUSETTS 249 49 1,087 19,925 4,036 2,158 3,152 MIT 501 28 945 9,786 418 5,632 352 MIAMI 97 44 810 12,887 1,549 4,269 808 MICHIGAN 605 77 3,210 34,968 3,280 11,779 1,922 MICHIGAN STATE 428 108 1,959 37,048 7,889 6,051 3,689 MINNESOTA 560 119 1,519 31,929 14,668 7,980 6,481 MISSOURI 228 69 1,688 20,711 2,956 3,332 1,904 MONTREAL 286 73 1,766 33,788 16,778 8,374 3,491 NEBRASKA 213 36 1,219 18,626 4,138 2,517 2,262 NEW MEXICO 187 38 974 15,978 7,775 3,288 4,024 NEW YORK 415 73 2,778 27,125 10,009 10,163 7,943 NORTH CAROLINA 390 64 2,589 21,285 4,209 6,225 3,425 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 273 54 1,604 21,891 7,395 3,546 3,322 NORTHWESTERN 286 46 2,143 14,065 3,305 4,780 1,802 NOTRE DAME 116 26 763 10,803 251 2,610 236 OHIO 113 46 1,038 22,907 5,290 2,523 1,243 OHIO STATE 617 91 2,988 40,429 8,048 9,189 3,239 OKLAHOMA 156 47 962 18,649 3,997 2,522 1,464 OKLAHOMA STATE 193 43 1,223 21,480 7,642 2,307 2,839 OREGON 139 42 701 15,887 3,204 2,786 1,099 PENNSYLVANIA 364 49 2,320 18,050 4,276 5,968 2,307 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 504 96 4,030 61,764 13,212 4,689 3,509 PITTSBURGH 292 64 1,844 32,584 7,791 6,057 2,855 PRINCETON 266 46 750 6,537 131 1,924 U/A PURDUE 416 55 1,849 34,441 3,767 5,203 2,018 QUEEN'S 133 38 748 15,259 2,964 2,234 431 RICE 120 30 481 4,367 70 1,639 47 ROCHESTER 185 45 1,018 4,448 1,318 2,336 1,071 RUTGERS 328 58 2,146 37,536 12,813 4,714 7,489 SASKATCHEWAN 58 43 948 14,632 2,904 1,396 431
* - Figures were reported on the ARL Questionnaire and have not been verified with the U.S. NCES IPEDS survey ** - Includes both undergraduate and graduate students U/A – Unavailable
50
PH.D., FACULTY, AND ENROLLMENT STATISTICS *
ENROLLMENTS
Ph.D.s Ph.D. Faculty Total FTE Total Graduate FTE Graduate Awarded Fields Full-time** Part-time** Full-time Part-time
(Survey Question #) (39) (40) (41) (42) (43) (44) (45) INSTITUTION
SOUTH CAROLINA 222 49 1,006 16,457 5,320 3,365 2,906 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 321 76 1,698 25,834 3,979 10,410 3,366 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 121 34 912 17,222 4,376 2,178 2,618 STANFORD 543 77 1,671 12,509 6,082 6,057 5,255 SUNY-ALBANY 145 35 592 12,937 4,267 2,186 3,134 SUNY-BUFFALO 233 80 1,198 20,668 5,170 5,347 3,201 SUNY-STONY BROOK 255 40 1,319 15,590 5,265 3,251 3,958 SYRACUSE 129 50 832 14,343 3,729 2,933 2,675 TEMPLE 239 58 1,133 24,568 8,908 4,890 5,376 TENNESSEE 237 59 2,099 24,019 4,298 4,145 2,234 TEXAS 644 91 2,394 44,880 5,736 10,853 1,154 TEXAS A&M 485 78 1,881 39,782 4,836 6,006 2,009 TEXAS TECH 135 50 1,494 22,486 4,212 3,335 1,522 TORONTO 497 84 2,612 41,905 14,418 8,346 2,346 TULANE 112 42 1,047 9,410 2,415 3,665 681 UTAH 217 52 871 17,245 9,555 3,136 1,430 VANDERBILT 171 41 1,700 10,049 447 3,874 387 VIRGINIA 289 46 1,052 18,204 4,535 5,408 3,567 VIRGINIA TECH 326 48 1,295 24,921 3,282 3,959 2,651 WASHINGTON 456 72 3,768 31,912 5,566 8,631 1,921 WASHINGTON STATE 159 43 1,082 16,970 4,103 1,746 1,175 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 173 108 714 9,941 2,246 4,032 1,383 WATERLOO 119 31 770 19,734 2,929 1,827 412 WAYNE STATE 202 56 1,154 16,225 14,943 6,467 6,293 WESTERN ONTARIO 122 41 1,164 21,505 3,777 3,531 343 WISCONSIN 649 113 2,047 36,116 4,806 9,095 1,966 YALE 293 59 1,578 10,937 189 5,684 156 YORK 88 U/A 1,214 30,466 9,112 2,756 1,641
SUMMARY DATA: PH.D., FACULTY, AND ENROLLMENT STATISTICS
Median 230 53 1,273 19,911 4,281 4,067 2,031
High 910 119 4,030 61,764 16,778 11,824 7,943
Low 40 15 481 4,367 0 1,396 0
Totals 30,005 6,356 164,044 2,429,706 567,734 520,871 252,592
# of Libraries Responding 114 112 114 114 114 114 113
* - Figures were reported on the ARL Questionnaire and have not been verified with the U.S. NCES IPEDS survey ** - Includes both undergraduate and graduate students U/A – Unavailable
51
RANK ORDER TABLES OF UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES, 2001-02
SUMMARY OF RANK ORDER TABLES FOR UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES, 2001-02
The table below presents the rank for each university library in each of the eighteen categories for which rank order tables are prepared. The table numbers in the chart below refer to the data categories listed below. The number of libraries indicates the number of ARL university libraries supplying data in each category.
TABLE DATA CATEGORY NO. OF LIBS. TABLE DATA CATEGORY NO. OF LIBS.
1 VOLUMES IN LIBRARY 114 10 MONOGRAPHS PURCHASED (VOLS.) 105 2 VOLUMES ADDED (GROSS) 114 11 EXPENDITURES FOR MONOGRAPHS 114 3 CURRENT SERIALS (TOTALS) 114 12 SERIALS PURCHASED (SUBS.) 86 4 MICROFORM HOLDINGS 114 13 EXPENDITURES FOR SERIALS 114 5 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS 103 14 TOTAL ITEMS LOANED (ILL) 114 6 MATERIALS EXPENDITURES 114 15 TOTAL ITEMS BORROWED (ILL/DD) 114 7 SALARIES & WAGES EXPENDITURES 114 16 PROFESSIONAL STAFF (FTE) 114 8 OTHER OPERATING EXPENDITURES 114 17 SUPPORT STAFF (FTE) 114 9 TOTAL LIBRARY EXPENDITURES 114 18 TOTAL STAFF (FTE) 114
INSTITUTION TABLES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
ALABAMA 91 93 82 65 7 82 106 68 94 33 84 70 66 112 83 85 99 96 ALBERTA 18 13 30 72 73 43 59 90 60 U/A 31 31 45 3 14 53 18 40 ARIZONA 23 23 41 22 73 23 34 31 30 22 27 19 17 42 34 32 35 27 ARIZONA STATE 38 30 32 6 16 36 30 40 37 25 28 28 32 22 38 37 19 27 AUBURN 73 99 44 95 38 101 110 71 106 95 97 71 93 87 106 94 108 109 BOSTON 93 79 53 56 U/A 74 63 64 66 98 106 U/A 49 98 50 43 70 41 BOSTON COLLEGE 108 61 76 66 50 66 67 95 74 U/A 72 U/A 55 89 104 65 95 82 BRIGHAM YOUNG 44 51 80 80 34 60 46 55 50 26 58 62 39 53 33 26 112 30 BRITISH COLUMBIA 25 33 34 40 U/A 39 37 38 39 23 55 U/A 29 50 18 27 17 23 BROWN 49 67 86 106 73 73 66 70 70 40 50 50 87 94 73 55 81 76 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 5 4 3 12 56 4 3 8 4 U/A 2 U/A 4 72 91 3 14 3 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 43 63 20 59 53 44 41 47 43 U/A 44 U/A 35 40 35 79 33 50 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 96 68 59 94 44 70 44 65 54 57 47 43 71 63 49 65 50 56 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 10 15 4 20 58 9 4 16 7 8 10 U/A 15 12 31 12 8 8 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 101 71 78 107 40 109 88 60 98 45 87 64 112 83 81 109 86 104 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 61 46 58 85 73 58 25 22 31 32 35 40 54 43 47 61 27 36 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 71 102 74 57 36 93 60 52 71 64 51 61 97 71 25 103 49 69 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 98 109 99 101 63 96 103 78 100 96 102 82 82 13 12 79 113 111 CHICAGO 12 12 25 91 U/A 15 31 35 29 6 11 U/A 14 41 67 63 24 33 CINCINNATI 63 38 36 82 61 49 58 46 52 24 45 12 51 9 5 48 89 61 COLORADO 56 89 67 17 5 46 64 66 58 46 68 80 44 27 42 98 64 70 COLORADO STATE 111 27 83 98 47 88 94 80 88 48 61 85 102 64 8 108 103 110 COLUMBIA 9 6 11 26 51 7 10 19 10 10 4 4 7 28 61 5 10 11 CONNECTICUT 54 56 35 52 67 61 38 54 46 70 89 26 67 29 17 58 92 72 CORNELL 11 7 7 4 U/A 10 9 9 11 U/A 8 U/A 20 62 68 16 7 9 DARTMOUTH 85 87 65 96 73 65 78 7 47 72 57 33 101 109 56 84 65 84 DELAWARE 77 94 110 81 33 75 81 96 83 50 42 84 90 106 74 92 76 77 DUKE 21 24 31 55 8 12 26 10 20 16 12 8 13 19 78 18 37 35
U/A - Unavailable
54
INSTITUTION TABLES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
EMORY 72 76 27 47 54 21 33 1 6 43 16 10 70 44 65 47 39 53 FLORIDA 34 25 60 7 6 22 29 44 32 15 32 24 16 21 55 25 21 21 FLORIDA STATE 79 47 89 10 13 69 95 92 86 19 81 67 69 91 86 71 57 67 GEORGE WASHINGTON 106 106 102 93 73 48 65 28 48 84 41 U/A 60 56 10 64 54 68 GEORGETOWN 94 45 62 76 65 55 48 51 49 49 66 34 52 99 103 57 61 63 GEORGIA 36 39 19 14 12 33 43 63 42 20 36 7 19 31 107 51 20 26 GEORGIA TECH 95 69 79 53 73 105 113 84 110 105 112 83 104 110 114 103 111 114 GUELPH 114 114 112 104 73 114 114 112 114 99 113 72 114 49 3 113 99 112 HARVARD 1 1 1 1 U/A 1 1 2 1 U/A 1 U/A 3 26 53 1 1 1 HAWAII 47 60 61 24 73 90 77 72 78 73 73 49 80 114 110 85 94 80 HOUSTON 99 83 85 61 21 71 97 67 81 58 69 U/A 94 57 71 70 87 86 HOWARD 80 108 111 75 72 107 100 104 107 104 114 68 103 108 113 92 98 98 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 100 97 87 71 17 67 54 49 61 88 82 46 42 6 19 53 40 57 ILLINOIS, URBANA 3 10 2 2 U/A 17 15 29 15 5 15 U/A 22 7 1 8 15 12 INDIANA 13 17 8 44 73 19 23 15 21 18 22 2 24 2 27 15 30 15 IOWA 30 20 16 9 23 28 36 57 36 11 40 16 37 24 51 46 52 43 IOWA STATE 88 88 52 79 73 53 79 97 75 61 53 36 40 77 89 96 84 93 JOHNS HOPKINS 40 55 49 54 70 26 27 26 27 35 37 37 23 58 32 28 36 39 KANSAS 35 50 38 78 19 62 52 61 57 28 43 45 65 34 22 36 65 45 KENT STATE 75 78 109 113 73 113 84 86 104 103 104 77 113 75 95 65 108 75 KENTUCKY 58 73 63 16 11 32 55 62 44 86 34 51 28 39 37 41 59 44 LAVAL 78 53 96 114 73 104 90 113 105 65 60 57 109 79 82 79 43 81 LOUISIANA STATE 50 90 68 32 24 92 93 85 92 68 86 U/A 88 111 45 71 95 86 LOUISVILLE 113 62 105 105 73 47 101 43 73 29 62 52 34 66 100 102 91 100 MCGILL 41 36 71 110 22 51 75 77 68 42 25 48 96 95 4 69 41 59 MCMASTER 110 113 98 111 73 106 111 110 111 100 109 78 91 81 85 114 75 108 MANITOBA 107 52 114 112 26 108 98 106 109 87 107 U/A 106 92 44 98 54 94 MARYLAND 60 42 39 29 52 52 28 45 40 44 52 65 83 45 59 21 70 48 MASSACHUSETTS 55 100 106 100 42 111 71 111 102 101 111 81 105 68 77 85 105 104 MIT 74 96 72 103 73 83 56 58 65 92 92 75 61 104 101 43 87 84 MIAMI 86 64 88 70 73 59 72 59 67 75 90 55 33 36 69 58 61 66 MICHIGAN 8 5 6 3 73 3 8 14 5 7 5 11 2 11 28 9 5 5 MICHIGAN STATE 27 32 54 28 73 57 49 50 51 37 48 59 43 33 21 74 54 55 MINNESOTA 17 18 29 23 2 27 16 12 16 63 39 22 25 1 46 31 22 20 MISSOURI 53 103 104 11 3 78 89 74 82 102 76 79 68 16 11 85 52 73 MONTREAL 48 49 77 108 64 76 53 100 69 66 78 42 58 85 66 42 11 32 NEBRASKA 70 81 70 48 27 94 91 98 95 90 98 66 78 84 87 105 73 88 NEW MEXICO 81 66 97 46 45 91 42 41 59 69 75 76 86 78 62 55 45 47 NEW YORK 32 16 37 42 28 13 18 20 14 14 14 25 11 86 48 22 12 19 NORTH CAROLINA 20 14 17 43 4 20 21 36 24 12 13 18 38 17 93 13 25 18 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 52 28 13 38 73 54 47 6 33 54 71 27 46 103 57 22 59 49 NORTHWESTERN 31 43 28 58 68 29 35 69 38 36 21 U/A 53 61 26 29 46 37 NOTRE DAME 59 37 64 74 73 41 57 93 55 31 23 U/A 76 59 94 78 38 58 OHIO 84 70 56 84 73 99 86 89 96 51 83 U/A 110 25 7 75 103 90 U/A - Unavailable
55
INSTITUTION TABLES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
OHIO STATE 19 22 22 27 62 18 22 39 25 1 19 9 6 4 2 19 31 17 OKLAHOMA 29 40 55 60 66 38 102 99 77 27 30 21 72 70 23 90 97 90 OKLAHOMA STATE 83 44 66 49 55 97 105 73 101 83 105 U/A 107 47 60 85 99 89 OREGON 76 74 95 90 32 89 73 91 80 53 74 73 95 18 15 94 84 77 PENNSYLVANIA 22 19 26 64 U/A 16 20 18 19 U/A 20 U/A 8 74 30 24 32 22 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 26 34 9 36 73 8 6 21 9 13 18 6 12 14 6 11 2 6 PITTSBURGH 28 29 24 50 U/A 25 39 37 34 U/A 24 U/A 10 35 76 30 42 33 PRINCETON 16 21 43 18 18 14 19 25 18 9 9 13 56 102 102 16 23 24 PURDUE 87 92 84 99 29 85 76 34 72 97 94 63 57 73 40 75 47 60 QUEEN'S 90 110 103 73 9 100 108 103 108 82 95 54 92 96 88 110 63 102 RICE 97 84 42 87 60 40 104 79 76 52 26 58 75 113 109 96 110 113 ROCHESTER 51 91 73 39 31 95 80 56 85 89 100 35 84 67 64 48 107 83 RUTGERS 33 48 33 25 1 34 14 83 23 56 63 U/A 26 105 84 32 13 16 SASKATCHEWAN 112 72 113 86 35 112 112 109 113 78 93 86 111 88 58 106 77 106 SOUTH CAROLINA 42 82 75 37 14 81 68 32 64 81 70 U/A 79 82 43 58 65 52 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 37 58 50 21 30 30 24 24 26 47 67 29 36 97 98 34 57 38 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 67 104 100 51 43 72 74 105 79 79 96 56 59 20 24 98 80 70 STANFORD 7 8 14 30 73 5 2 4 2 4 7 U/A 1 93 96 2 9 4 SUNY-ALBANY 105 98 48 92 73 103 83 88 97 94 103 17 98 101 90 71 102 97 SUNY-BUFFALO 46 80 45 33 U/A 63 51 76 62 80 80 47 48 48 92 19 114 64 SUNY-STONY BROOK 103 112 57 67 41 87 92 102 93 93 108 23 85 76 105 107 106 107 SYRACUSE 64 105 91 8 49 102 70 81 87 76 99 53 99 107 79 77 47 65 TEMPLE 69 77 94 88 57 79 85 82 84 59 88 69 81 90 99 65 89 77 TENNESSEE 66 75 69 63 71 45 62 75 56 62 54 39 30 38 29 48 44 45 TEXAS 6 9 15 19 73 11 12 13 12 17 17 30 18 46 52 13 6 10 TEXAS A&M 62 35 23 34 59 31 45 33 35 39 29 14 50 52 41 35 33 29 TEXAS TECH 92 54 46 102 69 56 69 42 63 38 56 38 47 30 16 52 65 50 TORONTO 4 2 12 35 73 6 7 17 8 2 6 3 9 60 108 7 3 2 TULANE 89 95 108 97 25 84 96 87 90 60 77 60 89 65 54 90 78 92 UTAH 57 41 40 77 15 64 32 27 41 U/A 46 15 77 15 80 62 28 25 VANDERBILT 68 65 51 89 48 50 61 53 53 34 59 32 27 55 97 38 70 62 VIRGINIA 24 26 10 31 20 37 17 30 22 30 49 20 41 32 36 43 26 31 VIRGINIA TECH 102 85 101 15 37 77 99 94 91 71 79 74 74 37 39 110 83 94 WASHINGTON 14 11 21 5 73 24 13 48 17 41 38 U/A 5 8 63 10 15 14 WASHINGTON STATE 104 107 47 45 U/A 86 82 107 89 77 91 U/A 64 54 72 98 92 101 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 39 57 93 83 U/A 42 40 5 28 67 64 44 73 69 20 38 50 54 WATERLOO 109 111 107 109 73 110 109 108 112 91 110 U/A 108 10 13 110 82 103 WAYNE STATE 45 86 92 68 39 68 50 23 45 74 65 U/A 62 23 75 38 79 42 WESTERN ONTARIO 65 101 81 69 73 80 107 114 103 85 101 41 63 80 111 82 73 98 WISCONSIN 15 31 18 41 46 35 11 11 13 21 33 5 31 5 9 6 28 13 YALE 2 3 5 13 10 2 5 3 3 3 3 1 21 51 70 4 4 6 YORK 82 59 90 62 73 98 87 101 99 55 85 U/A 100 100 112 82 69 74
U/A - Unavailable
56
RANK ORDER TABLE 1 VOLUMES IN LIBRARY
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 14,857,415 58 KENTUCKY 2,989,443 2 YALE 10,905,851 59 NOTRE DAME 2,975,820 3 ILLINOIS, URBANA 9,861,988 60 MARYLAND 2,956,648 4 TORONTO 9,525,835 61 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2,938,357 5 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 9,388,785 62 TEXAS A&M 2,924,918 6 TEXAS 8,229,689 63 CINCINNATI 2,874,157 7 STANFORD 7,698,099 64 SYRACUSE 2,865,922 8 MICHIGAN 7,643,203 65 WESTERN ONTARIO 2,838,293 9 COLUMBIA 7,557,346 66 TENNESSEE 2,816,914 10 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 7,444,831 67 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 2,748,990
11 CORNELL 6,963,879 68 VANDERBILT 2,746,052 12 CHICAGO 6,832,833 69 TEMPLE 2,738,286 13 INDIANA 6,512,090 70 NEBRASKA 2,720,838 14 WASHINGTON 6,274,025 71 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2,715,931 15 WISCONSIN 6,216,006 72 EMORY 2,705,123 16 PRINCETON 6,104,279 73 AUBURN 2,672,386 17 MINNESOTA 6,082,452 74 MIT 2,667,215 18 ALBERTA 5,768,464 75 KENT STATE 2,581,388 19 OHIO STATE 5,603,403 76 OREGON 2,548,402 20 NORTH CAROLINA 5,366,141 77 DELAWARE 2,540,162
21 DUKE 5,234,338 78 LAVAL 2,529,751 22 PENNSYLVANIA 5,152,960 79 FLORIDA STATE 2,522,954 23 ARIZONA 4,918,178 80 HOWARD 2,499,122 24 VIRGINIA 4,867,833 81 NEW MEXICO 2,473,170 25 BRITISH COLUMBIA 4,819,683 82 YORK 2,436,581 26 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 4,699,670 83 OKLAHOMA STATE 2,409,875 27 MICHIGAN STATE 4,503,950 84 OHIO 2,405,884 28 PITTSBURGH 4,339,324 85 DARTMOUTH 2,399,692 29 OKLAHOMA 4,319,702 86 MIAMI 2,399,584 30 IOWA 4,302,594 87 PURDUE 2,393,585
31 NORTHWESTERN 4,217,321 88 IOWA STATE 2,348,646 32 NEW YORK 4,145,681 89 TULANE 2,331,250 33 RUTGERS 3,979,219 90 QUEEN'S 2,329,631 34 FLORIDA 3,950,350 91 ALABAMA 2,302,472 35 KANSAS 3,908,979 92 TEXAS TECH 2,299,286 36 GEORGIA 3,873,001 93 BOSTON 2,296,538 37 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 3,730,085 94 GEORGETOWN 2,293,259 38 ARIZONA STATE 3,705,133 95 GEORGIA TECH 2,258,892 39 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 3,547,866 96 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2,249,653 40 JOHNS HOPKINS 3,509,413 97 RICE 2,240,044
41 MCGILL 3,360,591 98 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 2,236,337 42 SOUTH CAROLINA 3,333,764 99 HOUSTON 2,173,342 43 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3,310,850 100 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 2,165,704 44 BRIGHAM YOUNG 3,304,688 101 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2,141,065 45 WAYNE STATE 3,296,271 102 VIRGINIA TECH 2,137,042 46 SUNY-BUFFALO 3,287,867 103 SUNY-STONY BROOK 2,136,801 47 HAWAII 3,234,973 104 WASHINGTON STATE 2,116,080 48 MONTREAL 3,227,051 105 SUNY-ALBANY 2,054,677 49 BROWN 3,191,502 106 GEORGE WASHINGTON 2,043,942 50 LOUISIANA STATE 3,175,014 107 MANITOBA 2,036,069
51 ROCHESTER 3,150,464 108 BOSTON COLLEGE 1,970,143 52 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 3,143,738 109 WATERLOO 1,961,373 53 MISSOURI 3,111,319 110 MCMASTER 1,911,064 54 CONNECTICUT 3,105,039 111 COLORADO STATE 1,909,882 55 MASSACHUSETTS 3,089,191 112 SASKATCHEWAN 1,884,974 56 COLORADO 3,022,510 113 LOUISVILLE 1,833,386 57 UTAH 2,991,692 114 GUELPH 1,531,281
U/A - Unavailable 57
RANK ORDER TABLE 2 VOLUMES ADDED (GROSS)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 278,647 58 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 70,327 2 TORONTO 247,553 59 YORK 70,034 3 YALE 201,227 60 HAWAII 69,952 4 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 195,752 61 BOSTON COLLEGE 69,486 5 MICHIGAN 182,670 62 LOUISVILLE 69,189 6 COLUMBIA 173,993 63 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 68,919 7 CORNELL 172,700 64 MIAMI 68,843 8 STANFORD 168,272 65 VANDERBILT 67,318 9 TEXAS 167,786 66 NEW MEXICO 66,721 10 ILLINOIS, URBANA 158,740 67 BROWN 65,645
11 WASHINGTON 153,979 68 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 64,789 12 CHICAGO 152,001 69 GEORGIA TECH 63,183 13 ALBERTA 151,540 70 OHIO 62,880 14 NORTH CAROLINA 146,018 71 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 62,066 15 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 145,539 72 SASKATCHEWAN 62,054 16 NEW YORK 141,311 73 KENTUCKY 61,550 17 INDIANA 137,820 74 OREGON 61,547 18 MINNESOTA 137,719 75 TENNESSEE 61,436 19 PENNSYLVANIA 131,833 76 EMORY 61,344 20 IOWA 128,793 77 TEMPLE 61,163
21 PRINCETON 123,615 78 KENT STATE 59,109 22 OHIO STATE 116,823 79 BOSTON 58,772 23 ARIZONA 112,668 80 SUNY-BUFFALO 57,636 24 DUKE 109,430 81 NEBRASKA 56,908 25 FLORIDA 105,885 82 SOUTH CAROLINA 56,390 26 VIRGINIA 101,692 83 HOUSTON 56,091 27 COLORADO STATE 101,187 84 RICE 55,784 28 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 101,154 85 VIRGINIA TECH 55,276 29 PITTSBURGH 100,891 86 WAYNE STATE 55,092 30 ARIZONA STATE 98,451 87 DARTMOUTH 54,267
31 WISCONSIN 97,569 88 IOWA STATE 53,432 32 MICHIGAN STATE 95,548 89 COLORADO 52,668 33 BRITISH COLUMBIA 94,624 90 LOUISIANA STATE 50,641 34 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 93,443 91 ROCHESTER 50,512 35 TEXAS A&M 93,171 92 PURDUE 50,316 36 MCGILL 90,944 93 ALABAMA 49,575 37 NOTRE DAME 89,410 94 DELAWARE 49,498 38 CINCINNATI 88,691 95 TULANE 48,438 39 GEORGIA 88,443 96 MIT 47,403 40 OKLAHOMA 87,347 97 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 46,494
41 UTAH 86,075 98 SUNY-ALBANY 46,353 42 MARYLAND 86,009 99 AUBURN 45,129 43 NORTHWESTERN 85,218 100 MASSACHUSETTS 42,867 44 OKLAHOMA STATE 84,601 101 WESTERN ONTARIO 42,859 45 GEORGETOWN 84,162 102 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 42,619 46 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 84,121 103 MISSOURI 42,509 47 FLORIDA STATE 82,871 104 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 40,662 48 RUTGERS 82,451 105 SYRACUSE 39,756 49 MONTREAL 80,933 106 GEORGE WASHINGTON 38,881 50 KANSAS 79,869 107 WASHINGTON STATE 38,386
51 BRIGHAM YOUNG 79,337 108 HOWARD 38,209 52 MANITOBA 76,053 109 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 37,630 53 LAVAL 75,902 110 QUEEN'S 36,855 54 TEXAS TECH 72,918 111 WATERLOO 31,491 55 JOHNS HOPKINS 72,628 112 SUNY-STONY BROOK 30,314 56 CONNECTICUT 71,887 113 MCMASTER 28,001 57 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 71,805 114 GUELPH 21,755
U/A - Unavailable 58
RANK ORDER TABLE 3 CURRENT SERIALS (TOTALS)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 106,869 58 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 28,446 2 ILLINOIS, URBANA 90,707 59 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 28,416 3 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 83,089 60 FLORIDA 28,154 4 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 79,552 61 HAWAII 27,328 5 YALE 69,664 62 GEORGETOWN 26,521 6 MICHIGAN 69,218 63 KENTUCKY 25,917 7 CORNELL 62,077 64 NOTRE DAME 25,448 8 INDIANA 60,019 65 DARTMOUTH 25,300 9 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 56,270 66 OKLAHOMA STATE 24,806 10 VIRGINIA 55,843 67 COLORADO 24,337
11 COLUMBIA 54,958 68 LOUISIANA STATE 24,304 12 TORONTO 53,934 69 TENNESSEE 22,917 13 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 52,769 70 NEBRASKA 22,663 14 STANFORD 50,056 71 MCGILL 22,513 15 TEXAS 50,014 72 MIT 22,358 16 IOWA 49,128 73 ROCHESTER 22,240 17 NORTH CAROLINA 48,949 74 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 21,957 18 WISCONSIN 47,663 75 SOUTH CAROLINA 21,836 19 GEORGIA 47,304 76 BOSTON COLLEGE 21,416 20 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 45,860 77 MONTREAL 21,369
21 WASHINGTON 45,587 78 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 21,323 22 OHIO STATE 43,086 79 GEORGIA TECH 21,248 23 TEXAS A&M 42,304 80 BRIGHAM YOUNG 20,991 24 PITTSBURGH 41,908 81 WESTERN ONTARIO 20,919 25 CHICAGO 41,029 82 ALABAMA 20,763 26 PENNSYLVANIA 40,840 83 COLORADO STATE 20,712 27 EMORY 39,801 84 PURDUE 20,509 28 NORTHWESTERN 39,423 85 HOUSTON 20,276 29 MINNESOTA 38,121 86 BROWN 20,065 30 ALBERTA 37,045 87 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 19,732
31 DUKE 36,995 88 MIAMI 19,407 32 ARIZONA STATE 36,062 89 FLORIDA STATE 19,309 33 RUTGERS 35,960 90 YORK 18,988 34 BRITISH COLUMBIA 35,343 91 SYRACUSE 18,849 35 CONNECTICUT 35,263 92 WAYNE STATE 18,645 36 CINCINNATI 34,615 93 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 18,316 37 NEW YORK 34,399 94 TEMPLE 17,940 38 KANSAS 33,874 95 OREGON 17,840 39 MARYLAND 33,858 96 LAVAL 17,661 40 UTAH 33,517 97 NEW MEXICO 17,607
41 ARIZONA 33,282 98 MCMASTER 17,601 42 RICE 33,209 99 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 17,506 43 PRINCETON 32,446 100 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 17,467 44 AUBURN 32,265 101 VIRGINIA TECH 16,679 45 SUNY-BUFFALO 32,179 102 GEORGE WASHINGTON 16,638 46 TEXAS TECH 32,143 103 QUEEN'S 16,109 47 WASHINGTON STATE 31,718 104 MISSOURI 16,073 48 SUNY-ALBANY 31,369 105 LOUISVILLE 16,028 49 JOHNS HOPKINS 30,023 106 MASSACHUSETTS 15,260 50 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 29,877 107 WATERLOO 15,251
51 VANDERBILT 29,833 108 TULANE 14,998 52 IOWA STATE 29,681 109 KENT STATE 14,605 53 BOSTON 29,551 110 DELAWARE 13,541 54 MICHIGAN STATE 29,470 111 HOWARD 13,102 55 OKLAHOMA 28,614 112 GUELPH 12,637 56 OHIO 28,581 113 SASKATCHEWAN 11,261 57 SUNY-STONY BROOK 28,463 114 MANITOBA 9,865
U/A - Unavailable 59
RANK ORDER TABLE 4 MICROFORM UNITS
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 9,185,620 58 NORTHWESTERN 4,110,673 2 ILLINOIS, URBANA 9,069,875 59 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 4,103,817 3 MICHIGAN 8,027,897 60 OKLAHOMA 4,046,819 4 CORNELL 7,935,919 61 HOUSTON 4,023,252 5 WASHINGTON 7,387,734 62 YORK 3,957,861 6 ARIZONA STATE 7,322,247 63 TENNESSEE 3,956,872 7 FLORIDA 7,200,290 64 PENNSYLVANIA 3,875,003 8 SYRACUSE 7,114,070 65 ALABAMA 3,832,832 9 IOWA 6,958,388 66 BOSTON COLLEGE 3,829,735 10 FLORIDA STATE 6,872,780 67 SUNY-STONY BROOK 3,810,919
11 MISSOURI 6,766,615 68 WAYNE STATE 3,785,487 12 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 6,548,043 69 WESTERN ONTARIO 3,760,416 13 YALE 6,452,750 70 MIAMI 3,750,839 14 GEORGIA 6,336,813 71 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 3,723,648 15 VIRGINIA TECH 6,234,735 72 ALBERTA 3,677,528 16 KENTUCKY 6,202,256 73 QUEEN'S 3,652,395 17 COLORADO 6,199,844 74 NOTRE DAME 3,638,191 18 PRINCETON 6,145,305 75 HOWARD 3,600,000 19 TEXAS 6,083,600 76 GEORGETOWN 3,598,609 20 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 6,064,614 77 UTAH 3,543,837
21 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 6,038,707 78 KANSAS 3,489,807 22 ARIZONA 5,992,439 79 IOWA STATE 3,380,573 23 MINNESOTA 5,985,607 80 BRIGHAM YOUNG 3,342,028 24 HAWAII 5,972,239 81 DELAWARE 3,307,290 25 RUTGERS 5,792,405 82 CINCINNATI 3,268,118 26 COLUMBIA 5,592,973 83 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 3,226,960 27 OHIO STATE 5,569,978 84 OHIO 3,152,947 28 MICHIGAN STATE 5,556,525 85 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 3,076,325 29 MARYLAND 5,473,621 86 SASKATCHEWAN 3,035,173 30 STANFORD 5,444,678 87 RICE 2,990,617
31 VIRGINIA 5,435,023 88 TEMPLE 2,981,969 32 LOUISIANA STATE 5,375,405 89 VANDERBILT 2,923,802 33 SUNY-BUFFALO 5,322,129 90 OREGON 2,887,172 34 TEXAS A&M 5,304,146 91 CHICAGO 2,871,791 35 TORONTO 5,094,957 92 SUNY-ALBANY 2,810,863 36 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 5,066,834 93 GEORGE WASHINGTON 2,720,684 37 SOUTH CAROLINA 5,008,383 94 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2,584,114 38 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 5,006,819 95 AUBURN 2,557,163 39 ROCHESTER 4,998,630 96 DARTMOUTH 2,544,577 40 BRITISH COLUMBIA 4,993,103 97 TULANE 2,534,540
41 WISCONSIN 4,804,382 98 COLORADO STATE 2,520,216 42 NEW YORK 4,796,088 99 PURDUE 2,518,849 43 NORTH CAROLINA 4,734,753 100 MASSACHUSETTS 2,493,063 44 INDIANA 4,670,049 101 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 2,475,337 45 WASHINGTON STATE 4,662,429 102 TEXAS TECH 2,392,533 46 NEW MEXICO 4,628,643 103 MIT 2,357,872 47 EMORY 4,560,136 104 GUELPH 2,255,084 48 NEBRASKA 4,508,410 105 LOUISVILLE 2,122,902 49 OKLAHOMA STATE 4,493,010 106 BROWN 1,844,033 50 PITTSBURGH 4,446,110 107 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 1,701,311
51 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 4,442,331 108 MONTREAL 1,684,156 52 CONNECTICUT 4,405,678 109 WATERLOO 1,672,413 53 GEORGIA TECH 4,257,720 110 MCGILL 1,626,988 54 JOHNS HOPKINS 4,224,868 111 MCMASTER 1,548,150 55 DUKE 4,172,847 112 MANITOBA 1,475,456 56 BOSTON 4,170,322 113 KENT STATE 1,343,992 57 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 4,132,163 114 LAVAL 1,310,267
U/A - Unavailable 60
RANK ORDER TABLE 5 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 RUTGERS 2,651,256 58 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 68,072 2 MINNESOTA 2,641,938 59 TEXAS A&M 65,519 3 MISSOURI 1,655,520 60 RICE 55,920 4 NORTH CAROLINA 1,617,891 61 CINCINNATI 47,159 5 COLORADO 1,551,992 62 OHIO STATE 40,559 6 FLORIDA 1,314,142 63 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 23,920 7 ALABAMA 1,280,207 64 MONTREAL 11,510 8 DUKE 1,244,820 65 GEORGETOWN 9,242 9 QUEEN'S 1,172,175 66 OKLAHOMA 8,581 10 YALE 1,145,757 67 CONNECTICUT 7,755
11 KENTUCKY 1,128,997 68 NORTHWESTERN 7,600 12 GEORGIA 1,030,971 69 TEXAS TECH 4,222 13 FLORIDA STATE 928,459 70 JOHNS HOPKINS 3,983 14 SOUTH CAROLINA 876,308 71 TENNESSEE 1,803 15 UTAH 857,681 72 HOWARD 800 16 ARIZONA STATE 788,712 73 ALBERTA 0 17 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 747,303 74 ARIZONA 0 18 PRINCETON 735,816 75 BROWN 0 19 KANSAS 714,100 76 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 0 20 VIRGINIA 681,643 77 DARTMOUTH 0
21 HOUSTON 680,971 78 GEORGE WASHINGTON 0 22 MCGILL 680,484 79 GEORGIA TECH 0 23 IOWA 669,820 80 GUELPH 0 24 LOUISIANA STATE 624,193 81 HAWAII 0 25 TULANE 606,816 82 INDIANA 0 26 MANITOBA 557,610 83 IOWA STATE 0 27 NEBRASKA 552,672 84 KENT STATE 0 28 NEW YORK 499,289 85 LAVAL 0 29 PURDUE 488,464 86 LOUISVILLE 0 30 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 487,581 87 MCMASTER 0
31 ROCHESTER 486,769 88 MIT 0 32 OREGON 481,414 89 MIAMI 0 33 DELAWARE 432,134 90 MICHIGAN 0 34 BRIGHAM YOUNG 409,102 91 MICHIGAN STATE 0 35 SASKATCHEWAN 402,056 92 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 0 36 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 401,906 93 NOTRE DAME 0 37 VIRGINIA TECH 399,525 94 OHIO 0 38 AUBURN 390,171 95 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 0 39 WAYNE STATE 388,182 96 STANFORD 0 40 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 325,475 97 SUNY-ALBANY 0
41 SUNY-STONY BROOK 316,311 98 TEXAS 0 42 MASSACHUSETTS 315,238 99 TORONTO 0 43 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 313,172 100 WASHINGTON 0 44 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 310,606 101 WATERLOO 0 45 NEW MEXICO 307,484 102 WESTERN ONTARIO 0 46 WISCONSIN 294,205 103 YORK 0 47 COLORADO STATE 286,982 104 BOSTON U/A 48 VANDERBILT 250,693 105 BRITISH COLUMBIA U/A 49 SYRACUSE 217,928 106 CHICAGO U/A 50 BOSTON COLLEGE 202,492 107 CORNELL U/A
51 COLUMBIA 190,029 108 HARVARD U/A 52 MARYLAND 182,876 109 ILLINOIS, URBANA U/A 53 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 147,904 110 PENNSYLVANIA U/A 54 EMORY 136,705 111 PITTSBURGH U/A 55 OKLAHOMA STATE 131,638 112 SUNY-BUFFALO U/A 56 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 98,733 113 WASHINGTON STATE U/A 57 TEMPLE 93,928 114 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS U/A
U/A - Unavailable 61
RANK ORDER TABLE 6 TOTAL LIBRARY MATERIALS EXPENDITURES
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 25,646,556 58 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 7,576,614 2 YALE 22,815,173 59 MIAMI 7,556,841 3 MICHIGAN 18,210,398 60 BRIGHAM YOUNG 7,529,916 4 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 18,170,846 61 CONNECTICUT 7,338,672 5 STANFORD 17,689,265 62 KANSAS 7,276,400 6 TORONTO 15,325,123 63 SUNY-BUFFALO 7,049,995 7 COLUMBIA 14,719,764 64 UTAH 6,923,533 8 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 14,621,826 65 DARTMOUTH 6,890,710 9 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 13,661,380 66 BOSTON COLLEGE 6,861,816 10 CORNELL 13,503,577 67 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 6,809,191
11 TEXAS 12,723,386 68 WAYNE STATE 6,802,058 12 DUKE 12,048,338 69 FLORIDA STATE 6,736,492 13 NEW YORK 12,017,243 70 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 6,650,417 14 PRINCETON 11,819,682 71 HOUSTON 6,640,305 15 CHICAGO 11,818,383 72 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 6,603,085 16 PENNSYLVANIA 11,635,456 73 BROWN 6,583,380 17 ILLINOIS, URBANA 11,630,751 74 BOSTON 6,452,062 18 OHIO STATE 11,494,161 75 DELAWARE 6,436,668 19 INDIANA 11,316,326 76 MONTREAL 6,413,445 20 NORTH CAROLINA 11,273,318 77 VIRGINIA TECH 6,277,110
21 EMORY 11,223,133 78 MISSOURI 6,254,768 22 FLORIDA 11,148,617 79 TEMPLE 6,152,215 23 ARIZONA 11,141,668 80 WESTERN ONTARIO 6,105,258 24 WASHINGTON 11,127,343 81 SOUTH CAROLINA 6,101,332 25 PITTSBURGH 11,063,903 82 ALABAMA 6,071,392 26 JOHNS HOPKINS 10,853,538 83 MIT 6,042,206 27 MINNESOTA 10,396,547 84 TULANE 6,025,090 28 IOWA 10,139,631 85 PURDUE 6,014,807 29 NORTHWESTERN 10,086,037 86 WASHINGTON STATE 6,011,766 30 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10,021,658 87 SUNY-STONY BROOK 6,004,852
31 TEXAS A&M 10,002,491 88 COLORADO STATE 5,905,397 32 KENTUCKY 9,858,593 89 OREGON 5,846,473 33 GEORGIA 9,597,740 90 HAWAII 5,735,432 34 RUTGERS 9,223,777 91 NEW MEXICO 5,655,604 35 WISCONSIN 9,065,205 92 LOUISIANA STATE 5,624,544 36 ARIZONA STATE 9,054,553 93 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 5,578,014 37 VIRGINIA 8,891,857 94 NEBRASKA 5,519,480 38 OKLAHOMA 8,816,077 95 ROCHESTER 5,212,116 39 BRITISH COLUMBIA 8,815,266 96 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 5,154,608 40 RICE 8,774,360 97 OKLAHOMA STATE 5,036,502
41 NOTRE DAME 8,641,292 98 YORK 4,986,820 42 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 8,540,041 99 OHIO 4,945,186 43 ALBERTA 8,448,971 100 QUEEN'S 4,862,714 44 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 8,385,082 101 AUBURN 4,820,156 45 TENNESSEE 8,327,156 102 SYRACUSE 4,729,978 46 COLORADO 8,248,029 103 SUNY-ALBANY 4,720,169 47 LOUISVILLE 8,099,431 104 LAVAL 4,595,007 48 GEORGE WASHINGTON 8,095,549 105 GEORGIA TECH 4,564,395 49 CINCINNATI 8,031,454 106 MCMASTER 4,560,045 50 VANDERBILT 8,009,955 107 HOWARD 4,244,618
51 MCGILL 7,976,405 108 MANITOBA 3,997,457 52 MARYLAND 7,939,002 109 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 3,915,313 53 IOWA STATE 7,870,484 110 WATERLOO 3,835,088 54 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 7,781,023 111 MASSACHUSETTS 3,773,979 55 GEORGETOWN 7,756,580 112 SASKATCHEWAN 3,701,666 56 TEXAS TECH 7,695,114 113 KENT STATE 3,219,230 57 MICHIGAN STATE 7,599,249 114 GUELPH 2,581,849
U/A - Unavailable 62
RANK ORDER TABLE 7 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES EXPENDITURES
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 51,702,053 58 CINCINNATI 8,384,215 2 STANFORD 37,225,957 59 ALBERTA 8,291,476 3 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 26,191,157 60 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 8,168,124 4 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 22,760,428 61 VANDERBILT 8,167,160 5 YALE 22,387,709 62 TENNESSEE 8,150,041 6 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 20,073,687 63 BOSTON 7,972,229 7 TORONTO 20,067,914 64 COLORADO 7,839,506 8 MICHIGAN 19,306,928 65 GEORGE WASHINGTON 7,762,955 9 CORNELL 18,763,760 66 BROWN 7,565,059 10 COLUMBIA 18,628,306 67 BOSTON COLLEGE 7,397,475
11 WISCONSIN 18,491,480 68 SOUTH CAROLINA 7,216,431 12 TEXAS 18,106,345 69 TEXAS TECH 7,118,149 13 WASHINGTON 17,741,891 70 SYRACUSE 6,978,187 14 RUTGERS 17,570,324 71 MASSACHUSETTS 6,925,935 15 ILLINOIS, URBANA 16,906,025 72 MIAMI 6,786,678 16 MINNESOTA 16,088,952 73 OREGON 6,780,157 17 VIRGINIA 15,786,046 74 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 6,707,145 18 NEW YORK 15,702,953 75 MCGILL 6,699,813 19 PRINCETON 14,297,082 76 PURDUE 6,630,573 20 PENNSYLVANIA 13,702,060 77 HAWAII 6,550,555
21 NORTH CAROLINA 13,464,556 78 DARTMOUTH 6,437,297 22 OHIO STATE 13,101,475 79 IOWA STATE 6,373,650 23 INDIANA 13,074,825 80 ROCHESTER 6,271,843 24 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 12,899,412 81 DELAWARE 6,254,190 25 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 12,605,806 82 WASHINGTON STATE 6,059,606 26 DUKE 12,166,120 83 SUNY-ALBANY 6,038,364 27 JOHNS HOPKINS 11,575,759 84 KENT STATE 6,025,273 28 MARYLAND 11,237,102 85 TEMPLE 6,014,507 29 FLORIDA 10,992,972 86 OHIO 5,996,115 30 ARIZONA STATE 10,795,807 87 YORK 5,924,545
31 CHICAGO 10,676,568 88 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 5,896,685 32 UTAH 10,648,093 89 MISSOURI 5,762,786 33 EMORY 10,516,234 90 LAVAL 5,733,696 34 ARIZONA 10,499,514 91 NEBRASKA 5,701,960 35 NORTHWESTERN 10,443,041 92 SUNY-STONY BROOK 5,663,267 36 IOWA 10,421,345 93 LOUISIANA STATE 5,632,235 37 BRITISH COLUMBIA 10,400,292 94 COLORADO STATE 5,504,900 38 CONNECTICUT 10,146,477 95 FLORIDA STATE 5,494,090 39 PITTSBURGH 9,863,530 96 TULANE 5,407,771 40 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 9,815,168 97 HOUSTON 5,288,323
41 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 9,801,847 98 MANITOBA 5,235,036 42 NEW MEXICO 9,709,064 99 VIRGINIA TECH 5,222,871 43 GEORGIA 9,654,829 100 HOWARD 5,171,545 44 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 9,644,314 101 LOUISVILLE 5,058,289 45 TEXAS A&M 9,567,743 102 OKLAHOMA 4,868,956 46 BRIGHAM YOUNG 9,548,479 103 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 4,863,588 47 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 9,210,998 104 RICE 4,839,694 48 GEORGETOWN 9,205,805 105 OKLAHOMA STATE 4,822,006 49 MICHIGAN STATE 9,182,154 106 ALABAMA 4,483,087 50 WAYNE STATE 8,924,759 107 WESTERN ONTARIO 4,469,680
51 SUNY-BUFFALO 8,905,740 108 QUEEN'S 4,342,831 52 KANSAS 8,848,208 109 WATERLOO 4,095,788 53 MONTREAL 8,835,471 110 AUBURN 3,943,979 54 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 8,615,166 111 MCMASTER 3,933,593 55 KENTUCKY 8,580,504 112 SASKATCHEWAN 3,910,984 56 MIT 8,532,252 113 GEORGIA TECH 3,767,353 57 NOTRE DAME 8,444,257 114 GUELPH 3,283,880
U/A - Unavailable 63
RANK ORDER TABLE 8 OTHER OPERATING EXPENDITURES
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 EMORY 21,032,468 58 MIT 2,152,818 2 HARVARD 17,904,086 59 MIAMI 2,120,414 3 YALE 13,976,734 60 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2,071,826 4 STANFORD 13,627,975 61 KANSAS 2,040,538 5 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 7,807,922 62 KENTUCKY 2,031,488 6 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 7,562,295 63 GEORGIA 2,031,182 7 DARTMOUTH 6,557,176 64 BOSTON 2,018,379 8 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 6,320,082 65 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2,016,278 9 CORNELL 6,132,231 66 COLORADO 2,000,673 10 DUKE 6,088,156 67 HOUSTON 1,999,082
11 WISCONSIN 5,839,991 68 ALABAMA 1,963,787 12 MINNESOTA 5,556,407 69 NORTHWESTERN 1,935,126 13 TEXAS 5,436,811 70 BROWN 1,901,042 14 MICHIGAN 5,409,403 71 AUBURN 1,850,585 15 INDIANA 5,337,981 72 HAWAII 1,804,240 16 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 5,247,323 73 OKLAHOMA STATE 1,778,096 17 TORONTO 5,037,464 74 MISSOURI 1,776,733 18 PENNSYLVANIA 4,899,689 75 TENNESSEE 1,746,333 19 COLUMBIA 4,871,654 76 SUNY-BUFFALO 1,725,170 20 NEW YORK 4,752,987 77 MCGILL 1,715,706
21 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 4,724,710 78 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1,617,273 22 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 4,611,309 79 RICE 1,611,711 23 WAYNE STATE 4,536,385 80 COLORADO STATE 1,575,467 24 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 4,412,774 81 SYRACUSE 1,568,317 25 PRINCETON 4,357,566 82 TEMPLE 1,566,078 26 JOHNS HOPKINS 4,110,274 83 RUTGERS 1,489,348 27 UTAH 4,003,259 84 GEORGIA TECH 1,455,474 28 GEORGE WASHINGTON 3,851,363 85 LOUISIANA STATE 1,436,976 29 ILLINOIS, URBANA 3,758,345 86 KENT STATE 1,402,384 30 VIRGINIA 3,746,075 87 TULANE 1,347,723
31 ARIZONA 3,588,023 88 SUNY-ALBANY 1,330,113 32 SOUTH CAROLINA 3,558,691 89 OHIO 1,305,314 33 TEXAS A&M 3,322,612 90 ALBERTA 1,293,575 34 PURDUE 3,208,467 91 OREGON 1,282,988 35 CHICAGO 3,204,585 92 FLORIDA STATE 1,265,378 36 NORTH CAROLINA 3,077,681 93 NOTRE DAME 1,220,130 37 PITTSBURGH 2,986,611 94 VIRGINIA TECH 1,214,655 38 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2,977,473 95 BOSTON COLLEGE 1,208,057 39 OHIO STATE 2,896,565 96 DELAWARE 1,139,594 40 ARIZONA STATE 2,774,640 97 IOWA STATE 1,094,369
41 NEW MEXICO 2,698,342 98 NEBRASKA 1,025,364 42 TEXAS TECH 2,641,733 99 OKLAHOMA 1,022,244 43 LOUISVILLE 2,603,274 100 MONTREAL 932,325 44 FLORIDA 2,581,324 101 YORK 923,194 45 MARYLAND 2,573,327 102 SUNY-STONY BROOK 908,567 46 CINCINNATI 2,539,633 103 QUEEN'S 897,191 47 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 2,528,724 104 HOWARD 869,445 48 WASHINGTON 2,479,399 105 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 853,326 49 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 2,451,422 106 MANITOBA 851,302 50 MICHIGAN STATE 2,437,642 107 WASHINGTON STATE 791,219
51 GEORGETOWN 2,432,477 108 WATERLOO 748,871 52 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2,396,177 109 SASKATCHEWAN 690,130 53 VANDERBILT 2,354,208 110 MCMASTER 570,202 54 CONNECTICUT 2,333,030 111 MASSACHUSETTS 535,854 55 BRIGHAM YOUNG 2,277,724 112 GUELPH 519,648 56 ROCHESTER 2,207,441 113 LAVAL 363,676 57 IOWA 2,194,266 114 WESTERN ONTARIO 312,164
U/A - Unavailable 64
RANK ORDER TABLE 9 TOTAL LIBRARY EXPENDITURES
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 96,453,699 58 COLORADO 18,284,138 2 STANFORD 69,324,086 59 NEW MEXICO 18,218,340 3 YALE 59,721,810 60 ALBERTA 18,157,941 4 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 51,649,031 61 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 17,977,859 5 MICHIGAN 43,357,616 62 SUNY-BUFFALO 17,822,190 6 EMORY 42,940,841 63 TEXAS TECH 17,602,819 7 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 42,265,154 64 SOUTH CAROLINA 17,003,007 8 TORONTO 40,767,095 65 MIT 16,937,242 9 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 39,944,624 66 BOSTON 16,623,127 10 COLUMBIA 39,114,107 67 MIAMI 16,600,700
11 CORNELL 38,627,804 68 MCGILL 16,516,454 12 TEXAS 36,480,061 69 MONTREAL 16,320,305 13 WISCONSIN 33,601,436 70 BROWN 16,318,475 14 NEW YORK 33,053,589 71 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 16,245,123 15 ILLINOIS, URBANA 32,542,338 72 PURDUE 15,975,241 16 MINNESOTA 32,443,747 73 LOUISVILLE 15,894,354 17 WASHINGTON 31,567,959 74 BOSTON COLLEGE 15,635,626 18 PRINCETON 31,006,279 75 IOWA STATE 15,540,811 19 PENNSYLVANIA 30,651,864 76 RICE 15,299,012 20 DUKE 30,590,072 77 OKLAHOMA 14,874,223
21 INDIANA 30,066,578 78 HAWAII 14,334,410 22 VIRGINIA 28,625,035 79 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 14,317,884 23 RUTGERS 28,499,958 80 OREGON 14,065,716 24 NORTH CAROLINA 28,142,705 81 HOUSTON 14,024,436 25 OHIO STATE 27,822,167 82 MISSOURI 13,970,204 26 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 27,543,626 83 DELAWARE 13,922,287 27 JOHNS HOPKINS 26,698,270 84 TEMPLE 13,900,092 28 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 26,328,435 85 ROCHESTER 13,795,281 29 CHICAGO 26,135,283 86 FLORIDA STATE 13,694,417 30 ARIZONA 25,433,853 87 SYRACUSE 13,347,832
31 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 25,127,114 88 COLORADO STATE 13,127,158 32 FLORIDA 25,110,389 89 WASHINGTON STATE 12,948,941 33 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 24,707,755 90 TULANE 12,938,504 34 PITTSBURGH 24,245,757 91 VIRGINIA TECH 12,841,963 35 TEXAS A&M 23,089,082 92 LOUISIANA STATE 12,763,479 36 IOWA 22,935,690 93 SUNY-STONY BROOK 12,655,319 37 ARIZONA STATE 22,804,731 94 ALABAMA 12,649,090 38 NORTHWESTERN 22,662,772 95 NEBRASKA 12,414,324 39 BRITISH COLUMBIA 22,316,300 96 OHIO 12,358,884 40 MARYLAND 21,907,371 97 SUNY-ALBANY 12,163,653
41 UTAH 21,782,534 98 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 12,108,988 42 GEORGIA 21,545,504 99 YORK 11,954,418 43 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 20,952,891 100 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 11,732,876 44 KENTUCKY 20,633,107 101 OKLAHOMA STATE 11,684,621 45 WAYNE STATE 20,364,523 102 MASSACHUSETTS 11,405,971 46 CONNECTICUT 20,133,516 103 WESTERN ONTARIO 11,000,594 47 DARTMOUTH 20,095,283 104 KENT STATE 10,744,126 48 GEORGE WASHINGTON 19,836,875 105 LAVAL 10,692,379 49 GEORGETOWN 19,633,342 106 AUBURN 10,690,623 50 BRIGHAM YOUNG 19,561,049 107 HOWARD 10,359,864
51 MICHIGAN STATE 19,460,965 108 QUEEN'S 10,202,188 52 CINCINNATI 19,125,504 109 MANITOBA 10,185,375 53 VANDERBILT 18,743,351 110 GEORGIA TECH 9,878,727 54 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 18,508,185 111 MCMASTER 9,182,491 55 NOTRE DAME 18,456,038 112 WATERLOO 8,737,195 56 TENNESSEE 18,369,777 113 SASKATCHEWAN 8,368,971 57 KANSAS 18,328,601 114 GUELPH 6,421,718
U/A - Unavailable 65
RANK ORDER TABLE 10 MONOGRAPHS PURCHASED (VOLUMES)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 OHIO STATE 158,820 58 HOUSTON 31,749 2 TORONTO 156,402 59 TEMPLE 31,406 3 YALE 140,595 60 TULANE 30,752 4 STANFORD 110,353 61 IOWA STATE 30,556 5 ILLINOIS, URBANA 107,075 62 TENNESSEE 30,380 6 CHICAGO 104,981 63 MINNESOTA 30,077 7 MICHIGAN 103,002 64 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 30,043 8 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 100,562 65 LAVAL 29,209 9 PRINCETON 92,129 66 MONTREAL 28,675 10 COLUMBIA 88,677 67 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 28,477
11 IOWA 76,997 68 LOUISIANA STATE 28,476 12 NORTH CAROLINA 75,282 69 NEW MEXICO 27,958 13 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 74,982 70 CONNECTICUT 27,490 14 NEW YORK 72,729 71 VIRGINIA TECH 25,684 15 FLORIDA 70,637 72 DARTMOUTH 25,423 16 DUKE 64,357 73 HAWAII 24,937 17 TEXAS 61,624 74 WAYNE STATE 24,446 18 INDIANA 59,267 75 MIAMI 23,124 19 FLORIDA STATE 58,358 76 SYRACUSE 23,097 20 GEORGIA 55,333 77 WASHINGTON STATE 22,863
21 WISCONSIN 54,625 78 SASKATCHEWAN 22,526 22 ARIZONA 52,152 79 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 21,718 23 BRITISH COLUMBIA 52,000 80 SUNY-BUFFALO 21,657 24 CINCINNATI 51,959 81 SOUTH CAROLINA 21,562 25 ARIZONA STATE 51,080 82 QUEEN'S 20,882 26 BRIGHAM YOUNG 51,023 83 OKLAHOMA STATE 20,850 27 OKLAHOMA 49,906 84 GEORGE WASHINGTON 20,737 28 KANSAS 48,774 85 WESTERN ONTARIO 20,256 29 LOUISVILLE 48,248 86 KENTUCKY 19,750 30 VIRGINIA 45,960 87 MANITOBA 19,480
31 NOTRE DAME 45,916 88 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 19,424 32 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 45,817 89 ROCHESTER 19,225 33 ALABAMA 44,977 90 NEBRASKA 18,698 34 VANDERBILT 44,471 91 WATERLOO 18,687 35 JOHNS HOPKINS 44,279 92 MIT 18,554 36 NORTHWESTERN 43,312 93 SUNY-STONY BROOK 17,925 37 MICHIGAN STATE 42,609 94 SUNY-ALBANY 17,886 38 TEXAS TECH 40,145 95 AUBURN 17,541 39 TEXAS A&M 39,931 96 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 17,131 40 BROWN 39,877 97 PURDUE 16,581
41 WASHINGTON 38,912 98 BOSTON 16,552 42 MCGILL 38,186 99 GUELPH 16,300 43 EMORY 37,766 100 MCMASTER 14,700 44 MARYLAND 37,701 101 MASSACHUSETTS 14,236 45 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 37,239 102 MISSOURI 13,931 46 COLORADO 36,764 103 KENT STATE 13,192 47 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 36,522 104 HOWARD 8,960 48 COLORADO STATE 35,929 105 GEORGIA TECH 5,653 49 GEORGETOWN 35,923 106 ALBERTA U/A 50 DELAWARE 35,248 107 BOSTON COLLEGE U/A
51 OHIO 35,194 108 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY U/A 52 RICE 34,815 109 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS U/A 53 OREGON 33,199 110 CORNELL U/A 54 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 32,178 111 HARVARD U/A 55 YORK 32,123 112 PENNSYLVANIA U/A 56 RUTGERS 31,992 113 PITTSBURGH U/A 57 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 31,849 114 UTAH U/A
U/A - Unavailable 66
RANK ORDER TABLE 11 EXPENDITURES FOR MONOGRAPHS
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 8,846,163 58 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1,801,102 2 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 8,329,979 59 VANDERBILT 1,792,444 3 YALE 7,606,829 60 LAVAL 1,792,151 4 COLUMBIA 6,718,479 61 COLORADO STATE 1,768,217 5 MICHIGAN 6,032,483 62 LOUISVILLE 1,716,575 6 TORONTO 5,536,693 63 RUTGERS 1,701,381 7 STANFORD 5,233,920 64 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1,676,341 8 CORNELL 5,172,481 65 WAYNE STATE 1,662,347 9 PRINCETON 5,039,889 66 GEORGETOWN 1,656,381 10 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 4,610,594 67 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1,651,663
11 CHICAGO 4,369,169 68 COLORADO 1,637,656 12 DUKE 3,695,533 69 HOUSTON 1,627,745 13 NORTH CAROLINA 3,639,224 70 SOUTH CAROLINA 1,627,394 14 NEW YORK 3,637,121 71 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1,620,222 15 ILLINOIS, URBANA 3,623,267 72 BOSTON COLLEGE 1,568,139 16 EMORY 3,554,196 73 HAWAII 1,567,274 17 TEXAS 3,546,093 74 OREGON 1,551,306 18 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 3,454,023 75 NEW MEXICO 1,468,783 19 OHIO STATE 3,288,279 76 MISSOURI 1,451,102 20 PENNSYLVANIA 3,222,105 77 TULANE 1,436,996
21 NORTHWESTERN 3,088,300 78 MONTREAL 1,394,183 22 INDIANA 3,055,731 79 VIRGINIA TECH 1,340,306 23 NOTRE DAME 3,013,265 80 SUNY-BUFFALO 1,327,023 24 PITTSBURGH 2,909,731 81 FLORIDA STATE 1,322,913 25 MCGILL 2,788,130 82 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1,316,109 26 RICE 2,721,258 83 OHIO 1,315,181 27 ARIZONA 2,711,852 84 ALABAMA 1,313,676 28 ARIZONA STATE 2,695,988 85 YORK 1,299,157 29 TEXAS A&M 2,645,399 86 LOUISIANA STATE 1,274,754 30 OKLAHOMA 2,631,199 87 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 1,245,644
31 ALBERTA 2,608,391 88 TEMPLE 1,219,904 32 FLORIDA 2,520,517 89 CONNECTICUT 1,209,300 33 WISCONSIN 2,461,277 90 MIAMI 1,195,590 34 KENTUCKY 2,402,151 91 WASHINGTON STATE 1,125,200 35 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2,318,636 92 MIT 1,110,051 36 GEORGIA 2,273,930 93 SASKATCHEWAN 1,059,527 37 JOHNS HOPKINS 2,269,740 94 PURDUE 1,051,696 38 WASHINGTON 2,217,936 95 QUEEN'S 1,029,991 39 MINNESOTA 2,187,740 96 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1,026,680 40 IOWA 2,178,262 97 AUBURN 970,195
41 GEORGE WASHINGTON 2,143,369 98 NEBRASKA 951,491 42 DELAWARE 2,138,417 99 SYRACUSE 950,553 43 KANSAS 2,136,573 100 ROCHESTER 940,044 44 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 2,100,887 101 WESTERN ONTARIO 937,560 45 CINCINNATI 2,071,415 102 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 924,969 46 UTAH 2,062,695 103 SUNY-ALBANY 923,304 47 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2,046,894 104 KENT STATE 903,169 48 MICHIGAN STATE 2,036,235 105 OKLAHOMA STATE 897,706 49 VIRGINIA 2,025,021 106 BOSTON 830,438 50 BROWN 1,979,182 107 MANITOBA 796,799
51 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 1,947,514 108 SUNY-STONY BROOK 795,244 52 MARYLAND 1,935,870 109 MCMASTER 769,377 53 IOWA STATE 1,906,642 110 WATERLOO 766,573 54 TENNESSEE 1,865,985 111 MASSACHUSETTS 561,590 55 BRITISH COLUMBIA 1,851,852 112 GEORGIA TECH 545,932 56 TEXAS TECH 1,836,434 113 GUELPH 509,341 57 DARTMOUTH 1,812,826 114 HOWARD 504,125
U/A - Unavailable 67
RANK ORDER TABLE 12 CURRENT SERIALS PURCHASED (SUBSCRIPTIONS)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 YALE 60,034 58 RICE 14,807 2 INDIANA 53,662 59 MICHIGAN STATE 14,735 3 TORONTO 45,376 60 TULANE 14,141 4 COLUMBIA 44,854 61 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 13,993 5 WISCONSIN 40,022 62 BRIGHAM YOUNG 13,984 6 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 37,512 63 PURDUE 13,836 7 GEORGIA 34,785 64 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 13,710 8 DUKE 34,744 65 MARYLAND 13,534 9 OHIO STATE 34,107 66 NEBRASKA 12,777 10 EMORY 34,016 67 FLORIDA STATE 12,758
11 MICHIGAN 33,426 68 HOWARD 12,664 12 CINCINNATI 33,223 69 TEMPLE 12,565 13 PRINCETON 31,219 70 ALABAMA 12,430 14 TEXAS A&M 30,459 71 AUBURN 12,282 15 UTAH 30,062 72 GUELPH 12,237 16 IOWA 29,914 73 OREGON 12,043 17 SUNY-ALBANY 28,920 74 VIRGINIA TECH 11,859 18 NORTH CAROLINA 27,943 75 MIT 11,715 19 ARIZONA 26,711 76 NEW MEXICO 11,483 20 VIRGINIA 26,695 77 KENT STATE 11,476
21 OKLAHOMA 26,333 78 MCMASTER 11,208 22 MINNESOTA 26,275 79 MISSOURI 10,820 23 SUNY-STONY BROOK 25,814 80 COLORADO 10,665 24 FLORIDA 25,473 81 MASSACHUSETTS 10,216 25 NEW YORK 25,337 82 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 10,137 26 CONNECTICUT 24,402 83 GEORGIA TECH 8,881 27 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 23,526 84 DELAWARE 8,062 28 ARIZONA STATE 23,189 85 COLORADO STATE 7,746 29 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 22,979 86 SASKATCHEWAN 6,856 30 TEXAS 22,915 87 BOSTON U/A
31 ALBERTA 22,837 88 BOSTON COLLEGE U/A 32 VANDERBILT 22,391 89 BRITISH COLUMBIA U/A 33 DARTMOUTH 22,292 90 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY U/A 34 GEORGETOWN 21,901 91 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS U/A 35 ROCHESTER 21,282 92 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES U/A 36 IOWA STATE 20,663 93 CHICAGO U/A 37 JOHNS HOPKINS 20,413 94 CORNELL U/A 38 TEXAS TECH 20,240 95 GEORGE WASHINGTON U/A 39 TENNESSEE 20,063 96 HARVARD U/A 40 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 19,463 97 HOUSTON U/A
41 WESTERN ONTARIO 19,291 98 ILLINOIS, URBANA U/A 42 MONTREAL 18,981 99 LOUISIANA STATE U/A 43 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 18,674 100 MANITOBA U/A 44 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 18,057 101 NORTHWESTERN U/A 45 KANSAS 18,041 102 NOTRE DAME U/A 46 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 17,843 103 OHIO U/A 47 SUNY-BUFFALO 17,679 104 OKLAHOMA STATE U/A 48 MCGILL 17,673 105 PENNSYLVANIA U/A 49 HAWAII 17,514 106 PITTSBURGH U/A 50 BROWN 17,353 107 RUTGERS U/A
51 KENTUCKY 16,752 108 SOUTH CAROLINA U/A 52 LOUISVILLE 15,948 109 STANFORD U/A 53 SYRACUSE 15,811 110 WASHINGTON U/A 54 QUEEN'S 15,473 111 WASHINGTON STATE U/A 55 MIAMI 15,426 112 WATERLOO U/A 56 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 15,308 113 WAYNE STATE U/A 57 LAVAL 14,996 114 YORK U/A
U/A - Unavailable 68
RANK ORDER TABLE 13 EXPENDITURES FOR CURRENT SERIALS
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 STANFORD 11,866,219 58 MONTREAL 4,943,369 2 MICHIGAN 11,033,976 59 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 4,915,339 3 HARVARD 9,792,111 60 GEORGE WASHINGTON 4,910,840 4 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 9,738,625 61 MIT 4,902,513 5 WASHINGTON 8,847,747 62 WAYNE STATE 4,835,922 6 OHIO STATE 8,205,882 63 WESTERN ONTARIO 4,779,190 7 COLUMBIA 8,001,285 64 WASHINGTON STATE 4,731,660 8 PENNSYLVANIA 7,941,747 65 KANSAS 4,720,237 9 TORONTO 7,632,483 66 ALABAMA 4,716,022 10 PITTSBURGH 7,542,247 67 CONNECTICUT 4,693,019
11 NEW YORK 7,541,571 68 MISSOURI 4,690,259 12 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 7,456,595 69 FLORIDA STATE 4,689,196 13 DUKE 7,454,293 70 EMORY 4,650,272 14 CHICAGO 7,330,130 71 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 4,603,523 15 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 7,314,602 72 OKLAHOMA 4,593,699 16 FLORIDA 7,213,651 73 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 4,483,368 17 ARIZONA 7,010,579 74 VIRGINIA TECH 4,401,708 18 TEXAS 6,907,879 75 RICE 4,359,726 19 GEORGIA 6,762,378 76 NOTRE DAME 4,320,976 20 CORNELL 6,757,494 77 UTAH 4,311,192
21 YALE 6,711,332 78 NEBRASKA 4,310,312 22 ILLINOIS, URBANA 6,653,869 79 SOUTH CAROLINA 4,132,494 23 JOHNS HOPKINS 6,598,133 80 HAWAII 4,107,900 24 INDIANA 6,591,730 81 TEMPLE 4,106,876 25 MINNESOTA 6,479,640 82 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 4,093,523 26 RUTGERS 6,418,420 83 MARYLAND 4,063,748 27 VANDERBILT 6,157,611 84 ROCHESTER 4,039,504 28 KENTUCKY 6,109,621 85 SUNY-STONY BROOK 4,030,617 29 BRITISH COLUMBIA 5,965,549 86 NEW MEXICO 4,023,724 30 TENNESSEE 5,958,573 87 BROWN 4,020,542
31 WISCONSIN 5,945,987 88 LOUISIANA STATE 4,013,329 32 ARIZONA STATE 5,828,774 89 TULANE 3,990,306 33 MIAMI 5,765,840 90 DELAWARE 3,930,768 34 LOUISVILLE 5,760,695 91 MCMASTER 3,774,539 35 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 5,706,231 92 QUEEN'S 3,772,161 36 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 5,702,245 93 AUBURN 3,768,945 37 IOWA 5,646,530 94 HOUSTON 3,687,359 38 NORTH CAROLINA 5,548,162 95 OREGON 3,589,580 39 BRIGHAM YOUNG 5,530,637 96 MCGILL 3,559,177 40 IOWA STATE 5,518,683 97 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 3,518,997
41 VIRGINIA 5,487,724 98 SUNY-ALBANY 3,498,383 42 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 5,473,463 99 SYRACUSE 3,496,444 43 MICHIGAN STATE 5,434,509 100 YORK 3,458,185 44 COLORADO 5,412,392 101 DARTMOUTH 3,433,584 45 ALBERTA 5,405,949 102 COLORADO STATE 3,299,597 46 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 5,271,494 103 HOWARD 3,273,201 47 TEXAS TECH 5,261,367 104 GEORGIA TECH 3,203,529 48 SUNY-BUFFALO 5,241,768 105 MASSACHUSETTS 3,086,318 49 BOSTON 5,228,186 106 MANITOBA 2,899,362 50 TEXAS A&M 5,187,041 107 OKLAHOMA STATE 2,829,998
51 CINCINNATI 5,136,240 108 WATERLOO 2,827,508 52 GEORGETOWN 5,104,409 109 LAVAL 2,755,310 53 NORTHWESTERN 5,075,484 110 OHIO 2,592,632 54 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 5,065,145 111 SASKATCHEWAN 2,558,729 55 BOSTON COLLEGE 5,025,050 112 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2,460,367 56 PRINCETON 4,989,337 113 KENT STATE 2,231,579 57 PURDUE 4,963,111 114 GUELPH 1,835,326
U/A - Unavailable 69
RANK ORDER TABLE 14 TOTAL ITEMS LOANED (ILL/DD)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 MINNESOTA 214,465 58 JOHNS HOPKINS 29,021 2 INDIANA 108,902 59 NOTRE DAME 28,759 3 ALBERTA 107,831 60 TORONTO 28,539 4 OHIO STATE 105,513 61 NORTHWESTERN 27,946 5 WISCONSIN 104,406 62 CORNELL 27,663 6 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 95,043 63 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 27,603 7 ILLINOIS, URBANA 92,763 64 COLORADO STATE 27,577 8 WASHINGTON 91,326 65 TULANE 27,428 9 CINCINNATI 82,828 66 LOUISVILLE 27,389 10 WATERLOO 78,630 67 ROCHESTER 26,871
11 MICHIGAN 67,805 68 MASSACHUSETTS 25,517 12 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 66,372 69 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 25,279 13 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 59,272 70 OKLAHOMA 25,196 14 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 58,528 71 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 24,921 15 UTAH 54,750 72 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 24,893 16 MISSOURI 54,734 73 PURDUE 24,365 17 NORTH CAROLINA 51,784 74 PENNSYLVANIA 23,686 18 OREGON 51,348 75 KENT STATE 22,731 19 DUKE 49,768 76 SUNY-STONY BROOK 22,547 20 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 49,741 77 IOWA STATE 22,370
21 FLORIDA 49,622 78 NEW MEXICO 21,726 22 ARIZONA STATE 48,280 79 LAVAL 21,694 23 WAYNE STATE 47,554 80 WESTERN ONTARIO 21,557 24 IOWA 46,863 81 MCMASTER 21,115 25 OHIO 46,688 82 SOUTH CAROLINA 21,095 26 HARVARD 46,196 83 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 20,819 27 COLORADO 45,332 84 NEBRASKA 20,260 28 COLUMBIA 44,856 85 MONTREAL 19,689 29 CONNECTICUT 44,613 86 NEW YORK 19,172 30 TEXAS TECH 44,554 87 AUBURN 18,490
31 GEORGIA 44,479 88 SASKATCHEWAN 18,307 32 VIRGINIA 44,235 89 BOSTON COLLEGE 18,028 33 MICHIGAN STATE 44,033 90 TEMPLE 17,496 34 KANSAS 43,463 91 FLORIDA STATE 16,728 35 PITTSBURGH 43,298 92 MANITOBA 16,475 36 MIAMI 43,246 93 STANFORD 16,392 37 VIRGINIA TECH 42,654 94 BROWN 16,306 38 TENNESSEE 38,867 95 MCGILL 15,672 39 KENTUCKY 38,690 96 QUEEN'S 15,346 40 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 38,650 97 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 15,028
41 CHICAGO 38,117 98 BOSTON 14,373 42 ARIZONA 37,984 99 GEORGETOWN 13,608 43 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 37,588 100 YORK 13,330 44 EMORY 37,304 101 SUNY-ALBANY 12,830 45 MARYLAND 37,185 102 PRINCETON 12,589 46 TEXAS 35,789 103 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 12,559 47 OKLAHOMA STATE 35,540 104 MIT 12,474 48 SUNY-BUFFALO 35,166 105 RUTGERS 12,285 49 GUELPH 35,131 106 DELAWARE 11,991 50 BRITISH COLUMBIA 34,909 107 SYRACUSE 11,983
51 YALE 34,478 108 HOWARD 11,017 52 TEXAS A&M 33,413 109 DARTMOUTH 11,010 53 BRIGHAM YOUNG 31,439 110 GEORGIA TECH 10,942 54 WASHINGTON STATE 31,438 111 LOUISIANA STATE 10,252 55 VANDERBILT 31,092 112 ALABAMA 9,993 56 GEORGE WASHINGTON 30,296 113 RICE 9,599 57 HOUSTON 29,194 114 HAWAII 6,614
U/A - Unavailable 70
RANK ORDER TABLE 15 TOTAL ITEMS BORROWED (ILL/DD)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 ILLINOIS, URBANA 91,494 58 SASKATCHEWAN 21,306 2 OHIO STATE 88,876 59 MARYLAND 20,750 3 GUELPH 80,584 60 OKLAHOMA STATE 20,629 4 MCGILL 53,313 61 COLUMBIA 20,441 5 CINCINNATI 52,655 62 NEW MEXICO 20,377 6 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 49,450 63 WASHINGTON 19,561 7 OHIO 48,090 64 ROCHESTER 19,542 8 COLORADO STATE 47,920 65 EMORY 19,538 9 WISCONSIN 45,829 66 MONTREAL 19,466 10 GEORGE WASHINGTON 45,602 67 CHICAGO 19,110
11 MISSOURI 44,305 68 CORNELL 19,005 12 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 44,199 69 MIAMI 18,807 13 WATERLOO 41,599 70 YALE 18,497 14 ALBERTA 41,218 71 HOUSTON 18,260 15 OREGON 40,140 72 WASHINGTON STATE 18,158 16 TEXAS TECH 38,954 73 BROWN 17,949 17 CONNECTICUT 38,187 74 DELAWARE 17,905 18 BRITISH COLUMBIA 36,312 75 WAYNE STATE 17,750 19 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 35,055 76 PITTSBURGH 17,429 20 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 33,840 77 MASSACHUSETTS 17,084
21 MICHIGAN STATE 32,752 78 DUKE 16,909 22 KANSAS 32,402 79 SYRACUSE 16,900 23 OKLAHOMA 32,228 80 UTAH 16,879 24 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 32,193 81 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 16,820 25 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 31,958 82 LAVAL 16,554 26 NORTHWESTERN 31,228 83 ALABAMA 16,366 27 INDIANA 31,157 84 RUTGERS 16,123 28 MICHIGAN 30,988 85 MCMASTER 16,039 29 TENNESSEE 30,914 86 FLORIDA STATE 16,010 30 PENNSYLVANIA 30,641 87 NEBRASKA 15,584
31 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 30,520 88 QUEEN'S 15,409 32 JOHNS HOPKINS 30,395 89 IOWA STATE 15,169 33 BRIGHAM YOUNG 30,079 90 SUNY-ALBANY 15,132 34 ARIZONA 29,583 91 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 14,722 35 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 29,480 92 SUNY-BUFFALO 14,696 36 VIRGINIA 29,439 93 NORTH CAROLINA 14,418 37 KENTUCKY 29,408 94 NOTRE DAME 13,644 38 ARIZONA STATE 29,196 95 KENT STATE 12,626 39 VIRGINIA TECH 28,574 96 STANFORD 12,522 40 PURDUE 28,503 97 VANDERBILT 12,384
41 TEXAS A&M 27,140 98 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 12,103 42 COLORADO 26,804 99 TEMPLE 11,957 43 SOUTH CAROLINA 26,403 100 LOUISVILLE 11,195 44 MANITOBA 25,126 101 MIT 11,114 45 LOUISIANA STATE 25,026 102 PRINCETON 10,977 46 MINNESOTA 24,731 103 GEORGETOWN 10,847 47 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 24,360 104 BOSTON COLLEGE 10,803 48 NEW YORK 24,288 105 SUNY-STONY BROOK 10,006 49 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 23,726 106 AUBURN 9,359 50 BOSTON 23,510 107 GEORGIA 9,237
51 IOWA 23,493 108 TORONTO 9,052 52 TEXAS 23,173 109 RICE 8,349 53 HARVARD 22,677 110 HAWAII 6,758 54 TULANE 22,506 111 WESTERN ONTARIO 6,354 55 FLORIDA 21,839 112 YORK 4,813 56 DARTMOUTH 21,540 113 HOWARD 4,102 57 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 21,339 114 GEORGIA TECH 3,146
U/A - Unavailable 71
RANK ORDER TABLE 16 PROFESSIONAL STAFF (FTE)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 528 58 CONNECTICUT 78 2 STANFORD 314 59 MIAMI 78 3 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 254 60 SOUTH CAROLINA 78 4 YALE 226 61 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 76 5 COLUMBIA 196 62 UTAH 75 6 WISCONSIN 190 63 CHICAGO 71 7 TORONTO 188 64 GEORGE WASHINGTON 70 8 ILLINOIS, URBANA 176 65 BOSTON COLLEGE 69 9 MICHIGAN 167 66 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 69 10 WASHINGTON 152 67 KENT STATE 69
11 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 151 68 TEMPLE 69 12 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 142 69 MCGILL 68 13 NORTH CAROLINA 140 70 HOUSTON 66 14 TEXAS 140 71 FLORIDA STATE 64 15 INDIANA 139 72 LOUISIANA STATE 64 16 CORNELL 133 73 SUNY-ALBANY 64 17 PRINCETON 133 74 MICHIGAN STATE 63 18 DUKE 128 75 OHIO 62 19 OHIO STATE 126 76 PURDUE 62 20 SUNY-BUFFALO 126 77 SYRACUSE 61
21 MARYLAND 124 78 NOTRE DAME 60 22 NEW YORK 120 79 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 59 23 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 120 80 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 59 24 PENNSYLVANIA 119 81 LAVAL 59 25 FLORIDA 118 82 WESTERN ONTARIO 58 26 BRIGHAM YOUNG 116 83 YORK 58 27 BRITISH COLUMBIA 115 84 DARTMOUTH 57 28 JOHNS HOPKINS 114 85 ALABAMA 56 29 NORTHWESTERN 112 86 HAWAII 56 30 PITTSBURGH 108 87 MASSACHUSETTS 56
31 MINNESOTA 107 88 MISSOURI 56 32 ARIZONA 106 89 OKLAHOMA STATE 56 33 RUTGERS 106 90 OKLAHOMA 55 34 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 105 91 TULANE 55 35 TEXAS A&M 104 92 DELAWARE 54 36 KANSAS 103 93 HOWARD 54 37 ARIZONA STATE 102 94 AUBURN 53 38 VANDERBILT 100 95 OREGON 53 39 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 100 96 IOWA STATE 52 40 WAYNE STATE 100 97 RICE 52
41 KENTUCKY 98 98 COLORADO 51 42 MONTREAL 95 99 MANITOBA 51 43 BOSTON 94 100 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 51 44 MIT 94 101 WASHINGTON STATE 51 45 VIRGINIA 94 102 LOUISVILLE 50 46 IOWA 91 103 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 49 47 EMORY 90 104 GEORGIA TECH 49 48 CINCINNATI 89 105 NEBRASKA 48 49 ROCHESTER 89 106 SASKATCHEWAN 47 50 TENNESSEE 89 107 SUNY-STONY BROOK 46
51 GEORGIA 87 108 COLORADO STATE 45 52 TEXAS TECH 85 109 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 40 53 ALBERTA 82 110 QUEEN'S 39 54 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 82 111 VIRGINIA TECH 39 55 BROWN 81 112 WATERLOO 39 56 NEW MEXICO 81 113 GUELPH 34 57 GEORGETOWN 80 114 MCMASTER 32
U/A - Unavailable 72
RANK ORDER TABLE 17 SUPPORT STAFF (FTE)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 657 58 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 127 2 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 399 59 KENTUCKY 126 3 TORONTO 363 60 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 126 4 YALE 349 61 GEORGETOWN 125 5 MICHIGAN 347 62 MIAMI 125 6 TEXAS 327 63 QUEEN'S 120 7 CORNELL 320 64 COLORADO 119 8 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 281 65 DARTMOUTH 118 9 STANFORD 262 66 KANSAS 118 10 COLUMBIA 260 67 SOUTH CAROLINA 118
11 MONTREAL 246 68 TEXAS TECH 118 12 NEW YORK 243 69 YORK 115 13 RUTGERS 240 70 BOSTON 113 14 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 239 71 MARYLAND 113 15 ILLINOIS, URBANA 222 72 VANDERBILT 113 16 WASHINGTON 222 73 NEBRASKA 112 17 BRITISH COLUMBIA 220 74 WESTERN ONTARIO 112 18 ALBERTA 216 75 MCMASTER 111 19 ARIZONA STATE 214 76 DELAWARE 110 20 GEORGIA 213 77 SASKATCHEWAN 108
21 FLORIDA 212 78 TULANE 106 22 MINNESOTA 211 79 WAYNE STATE 104 23 PRINCETON 210 80 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 103 24 CHICAGO 209 81 BROWN 100 25 NORTH CAROLINA 206 82 WATERLOO 99 26 VIRGINIA 197 83 VIRGINIA TECH 98 27 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 195 84 IOWA STATE 97 28 UTAH 192 85 OREGON 97 29 WISCONSIN 192 86 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 96 30 INDIANA 187 87 HOUSTON 95
31 OHIO STATE 181 88 MIT 95 32 PENNSYLVANIA 178 89 CINCINNATI 92 33 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 173 90 TEMPLE 92 34 TEXAS A&M 173 91 LOUISVILLE 91 35 ARIZONA 172 92 CONNECTICUT 90 36 JOHNS HOPKINS 171 93 WASHINGTON STATE 90 37 DUKE 170 94 HAWAII 89 38 NOTRE DAME 168 95 BOSTON COLLEGE 85 39 EMORY 160 96 LOUISIANA STATE 85 40 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 156 97 OKLAHOMA 84
41 MCGILL 153 98 HOWARD 81 42 PITTSBURGH 152 99 ALABAMA 79 43 LAVAL 151 100 GUELPH 79 44 TENNESSEE 149 101 OKLAHOMA STATE 79 45 NEW MEXICO 148 102 SUNY-ALBANY 76 46 NORTHWESTERN 146 103 COLORADO STATE 75 47 PURDUE 143 104 OHIO 75 48 SYRACUSE 143 105 MASSACHUSETTS 74 49 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 137 106 SUNY-STONY BROOK 70 50 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 134 107 ROCHESTER 69
51 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 134 108 AUBURN 63 52 IOWA 133 109 KENT STATE 63 53 MISSOURI 133 110 RICE 62 54 GEORGE WASHINGTON 128 111 GEORGIA TECH 59 55 MANITOBA 128 112 BRIGHAM YOUNG 57 56 MICHIGAN STATE 128 113 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 56 57 FLORIDA STATE 127 114 SUNY-BUFFALO 55
U/A - Unavailable 73
RANK ORDER TABLE 18 TOTAL STAFF (FTE)
RANK INSTITUTION VALUE RANK INSTITUTION VALUE
1 HARVARD 1,307 58 NOTRE DAME 270 2 TORONTO 698 59 MCGILL 267 3 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 687 60 PURDUE 263 4 STANFORD 672 61 CINCINNATI 262 5 MICHIGAN 643 62 VANDERBILT 256 6 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 637 63 GEORGETOWN 252 7 YALE 637 64 SUNY-BUFFALO 249 8 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 601 65 SYRACUSE 246 9 CORNELL 590 66 MIAMI 242 10 TEXAS 561 67 FLORIDA STATE 241
11 COLUMBIA 535 68 GEORGE WASHINGTON 240 12 ILLINOIS, URBANA 522 69 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 238 13 WISCONSIN 513 70 COLORADO 236 14 WASHINGTON 506 71 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 236 15 INDIANA 458 72 CONNECTICUT 234 16 RUTGERS 441 73 MISSOURI 222 17 OHIO STATE 433 74 YORK 220 18 NORTH CAROLINA 429 75 KENT STATE 218 19 NEW YORK 427 76 BROWN 217 20 MINNESOTA 423 77 DELAWARE 215
21 FLORIDA 407 78 OREGON 215 22 PENNSYLVANIA 403 79 TEMPLE 215 23 BRITISH COLUMBIA 391 80 HAWAII 214 24 PRINCETON 371 81 LAVAL 213 25 UTAH 365 82 BOSTON COLLEGE 209 26 GEORGIA 364 83 ROCHESTER 208 27 ARIZONA 362 84 DARTMOUTH 206 28 ARIZONA STATE 362 85 MIT 206 29 TEXAS A&M 360 86 HOUSTON 205 30 BRIGHAM YOUNG 350 87 LOUISIANA STATE 205
31 VIRGINIA 349 88 NEBRASKA 203 32 MONTREAL 345 89 OKLAHOMA STATE 202 33 CHICAGO 344 90 OHIO 200 34 PITTSBURGH 344 91 OKLAHOMA 200 35 DUKE 343 92 TULANE 199 36 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 341 93 IOWA STATE 198 37 NORTHWESTERN 340 94 MANITOBA 194 38 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 339 95 VIRGINIA TECH 194 39 JOHNS HOPKINS 338 96 ALABAMA 188 40 ALBERTA 330 97 SUNY-ALBANY 186
41 BOSTON 321 98 HOWARD 185 42 WAYNE STATE 309 99 WESTERN ONTARIO 185 43 IOWA 308 100 LOUISVILLE 178 44 KENTUCKY 305 101 WASHINGTON STATE 177 45 KANSAS 301 102 QUEEN'S 176 46 TENNESSEE 301 103 WATERLOO 174 47 NEW MEXICO 298 104 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 170 48 MARYLAND 296 105 MASSACHUSETTS 170 49 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 294 106 SASKATCHEWAN 167 50 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 293 107 SUNY-STONY BROOK 163
51 TEXAS TECH 293 108 MCMASTER 161 52 SOUTH CAROLINA 292 109 AUBURN 150 53 EMORY 289 110 COLORADO STATE 146 54 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 285 111 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 142 55 MICHIGAN STATE 284 112 GUELPH 130 56 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 279 113 RICE 127 57 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 274 114 GEORGIA TECH 113
U/A - Unavailable 74
ARL STATISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE, 2001-02
ARL STATISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE, 2001-02 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE QUESTIONNAIRE
General Instructions
Please enter your data on the ARL Statistics Website (access via
Definitions of the statistical categories used in this questionnaire can be found in Library Statistics, ANSI/NISO Z39.7-1995. (Bethesda, MD: NISO Press, 1997.) Also, see:
The questionnaire assumes a fiscal year ending June 30, 2002. If your fiscal year is different, please provide a footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire.
Please do not use decimals. All figures should be rounded to the nearest whole number.
Please do not leave any lines blank. If an exact figure is unavailable, use -1, i.e., “U/A.” If the appropriate answer is zero or none, use 0. For non-university libraries, if a question is not applicable to your library, use -2, i.e., “N/A.” (Academic libraries should never use -2.)
In a university that includes both main and branch campuses, an effort should be made to report figures for the main campus only. (The U.S. National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) defines a branch institution as “a campus or site of an educational institution that is not temporary, is located in a community beyond a reasonable commuting distance from its parent institution, and offers organized programs of study, not just courses.”) If figures for libraries located at branch campuses are reported, please provide an explanation in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire.
A branch library is defined as an auxiliary library service outlet with quarters separate from the central library of an institution, which has a basic collection of books and other materials, a regular staffing level, and an established schedule. A branch library is administered either by the central library or (as in the case of some law and medical libraries) through the administrative structure of other units within the university. Departmental study/reading rooms are not included.
Specific Instructions
Questions 1-4. Volumes in Library. Use the ANSI/NISO Z39.7-1995 definition for volume as follows:
a single physical unit of any printed, typewritten, handwritten, mimeographed, or processed work, distinguished from other units by a separate binding, encasement, portfolio, or other clear distinction, which has been cataloged, classified, and made ready for use, and which is typically the unit used to charge circulation transactions.
Include duplicates and bound volumes of periodicals. For purposes of this questionnaire, unclassified bound serials arranged in alphabetical order are considered classified. Exclude microforms, maps, nonprint materials, and uncataloged items. If any of these items cannot be excluded, please provide an explanatory footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire.
Include government document volumes that are accessible through the library’s catalogs regardless of whether they are separately shelved. “Classified” includes documents arranged by Superintendent of Documents, CODOC, or similar numbers. “Cataloged” includes documents for which records are provided by the library or downloaded from other sources into the library’s card or online catalogs. Documents should, to the extent possible, be counted as they would if they were in
77
bound volumes (e.g., 12 issues of an annual serial would be one or two volumes). Title and piece counts should not be considered the same as volume counts. If a volume count has not been kept, it may be estimated through sampling a representative group of title records and determining the corresponding number of volumes, then extrapolating to the rest of the collection. As an alternative, an estimate may be made using the following formulae:
52 documents pieces per foot 10 “traditional” volumes per foot 5.2 documents pieces per volume
If either formulas or sampling are used for deriving your count, please indicate in a footnote.
Question 2. Volumes Added. Include only volumes cataloged, classified, and made ready for use. Include government documents if they have been included in the count of volumes on line 1a. Do not include as part of Volumes Added Gross any government documents or other collections (such as large gift collections) that were added to the collection as the result of a one time download or addition to the OPAC. Include these items in Volumes Held of the previous year (Line 1a) and provide a footnote explaining the revision of Line 1a.
Question 4. Monographic Volumes Purchased. Report number of volumes purchased. Include all volumes for which an expenditure was made during 2001-02, including volumes paid for in advance but not received during the fiscal year. Include monographs in series and continuations. If only number of titles purchased can be reported, please report the data and provide an explanatory footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire. Note: This question is concerned with volumes purchased rather than volumes received or cataloged. Question 16 requests the expenditure for the volumes counted here.
Questions 5-7. Serials. Report the total number of subscriptions, not titles. Include duplicate subscriptions and, to the extent possible, all government document serials even if housed in a separate documents collection. Verify the inclusion or exclusion of document serials in Question 48 of the questionnaire. Exclude unnumbered monographic and publishers’ series. Electronic serials acquired as part of an aggregated package (e.g., Project MUSE, Academic IDEAL) should be counted by title. A serial is
a publication in any medium issued in successive parts bearing numerical or chronological designations and intended to be continued indefinitely. This definition includes periodicals, newspapers, and annuals (reports, yearbooks, etc.); the journals, memoirs, proceedings, transactions, etc. of societies; and numbered monographic series.
Question 6. Serials: Not Purchased. If separate counts of nonpurchased and purchased serials are not available, report only the total number of current serials received on line 7, and report -1, i.e., “U/A,” for lines 5 and 6.
Question 8. Microforms. Report the total number of physical units: reels of microfilm, microcards, and microprint and microfiche sheets. Include all government documents in microform; provide a footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire if documents are excluded.
Question 9. Government documents. Report the total number of physical units (pieces) of government documents in paper format that have not been counted elsewhere. Include local, state, national, and international documents; include documents purchased from a commercial source if shelved with separate documents collections and not counted above. Include serials and monographs. To estimate pieces from a measurement of linear feet, use the formula 1 foot = 52 pieces and indicate in a footnote that the count is based on this estimate. Exclude microforms and nonprint formats such as maps or CD-ROMs. Adjust line 1a, i.e., last year’s Volumes Held, and provide a footnote if you are adding records to the OPAC for government documents previously held but not counted as part of Volumes Held (line 1a).
Question 10. Computer files. Include the number of pieces of computer-readable disks, tapes, CD-ROMs, and similar machine-readable files comprising data or programs that are locally held as part of the library’s collections available to library clients. Examples are U.S. Census data tapes, sample research software, locally-mounted databases, and reference tools on CD-ROM, tape or disk. Exclude bibliographic records used to manage the collection (i.e., the library’s own catalog in machine-readable form), library system software, and microcomputer software used only by the library staff.
Question 11. Manuscripts and archives. Include both manuscripts and archives measured in linear feet.
78
Question 12. Cartographic materials. Include the numbers of pieces of two- and three-dimensional maps and globes. Include satellite and aerial photographs and images.
Question 13. Graphic materials. Include the number of pieces of prints, pictures, photographs, postcards, slides, transparencies, film strips, and the like.
Question 14. Audio materials. Include the number of pieces of audiocassettes, phonodiscs, audio compact discs, reel-to- reel tapes, and other sound recordings.
Question 15. Film and video materials. Include the number of pieces of motion pictures, videocassettes, video laser discs, and similar visual materials.
Questions 16-27. Expenditures. Report all expenditures of funds that come to the library from the regular institutional budget, and from sources such as research grants, special projects, gifts and endowments, and fees for service. (For question 25, include non-library funds; see instruction Q24-25.) Do not report encumbrances of funds that have not yet been expended. Canadian libraries should report expenditures in Canadian dollars. (To determine figures in U.S. dollars, divide Canadian dollar amounts by 1.56878, the average monthly noon exchange rate published in the Bank of Canada Review for the period July 2001-June 2002.) Please round figures to the nearest dollar.
Question 16. Monographs. Report expenditures for volumes counted on line 4.
Question 17. Current Serials. Report expenditures for serials counted on line 5. Exclude unnumbered monographic and publishers’ series, and encumbrances.
Question 18. Other library materials. Include expenditures for all materials not reported in Questions 16 and 17, e.g., backfiles of serials, charts and maps, audiovisual materials, manuscripts, etc. If expenditures for these materials are included in lines 16 and/or 17 and cannot be disaggregated, please report -1, i.e., "“U/A,” and provide a footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire. Do not include encumbrances.
Question 19. Miscellaneous expenditures. Include any other materials funds expenditures not included in questions 16- 18, e.g., expenditures for bibliographic utilities, literature searching, security devices, memberships for the purposes of publications, etc. Please list categories, with amounts, in a footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire. Note: If your library does not use materials funds for non-materials expenditures—i.e., such expenditures are included in “Other Operating Expenditures”—report 0, not -1, i.e., “U/A,” on line 19.
Question 21. Contract Binding. Include only contract expenditures for binding done outside the library. If all binding is done in-house, state this fact and give in-house expenditures in a footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire; do not include personnel expenditures. (This figure should also be reported in the 2001-02 ARL Preservation Survey, question 7b.)
Questions 22-25. Salaries and wages. Exclude fringe benefits. If professional and support staff salaries cannot be separated, enter -1, i.e., “U/A,” on lines 22 and 23 and enter total staff on line 25.
Questions 24-25. Salaries and wages: Student Assistants. Report 100% of student wages regardless of budgetary source of funds. Include federal and local funds for work study students.
Question 26. Other operating expenditures. Exclude expenditures for buildings, maintenance, and fringe benefits.
Questions 28-31. Personnel. Report the number of staff in filled positions, or positions that are only temporarily vacant. ARL defines temporarily vacant positions as positions that were vacated during the fiscal year for which ARL data were submitted, for which there is a firm intent to refill, and for which there are expenditures for salaries reported on lines 22-25.
Include cost recovery positions and staff hired for special projects and grants, but provide an explanatory footnote indicating the number of such staff. If such staff cannot be included, provide a footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire. To compute full-time equivalents of part-time employees and student assistants, take the total number of hours per week (or year) worked by part-time employees in each category and divide it by the number of hours considered by the reporting library to be a full-time work week (or year). Round figures to the nearest whole numbers.
79
Question 28. Professional Staff. Since the criteria for determining professional status vary among libraries, there is no attempt to define the term “professional.” Each library should report those staff members it considers professional, including, when appropriate, staff who are not librarians in the strict sense of the term, for example computer experts, systems analysts, or budget officers.
Question 30. Student Assistants. Report the total FTE (see instruction Q28-31) of student assistants employed on an hourly basis whose wages are paid from funds under library control or from a budget other than the library’s, including federal work-study programs. Exclude maintenance and custodial staff.
Questions 32-33. Instruction. Sampling based on a typical week may be used to extrapolate TO A FULL YEAR for Questions 32 and 33. Please indicate if responses are based on sampling.
Question 32. Presentations to Groups. Report the total number of sessions during the year of presentations made as part of formal bibliographic instruction programs and through other planned class presentations, orientation sessions, and tours. If the library sponsors multi-session or credit courses that meet several times over the course of a semester, each session should be counted. Presentations to groups may be for either bibliographic instruction, cultural, recreational, or educational purposes. Presentations both on and off the premises should be included as long as they are sponsored by the library. Do not include meetings sponsored by other groups using library meeting rooms. Please indicate if the figure is based on sampling.
Question 33. Participants in Group Presentations. Report the total number of participants in the presentations reported on line 32. For multi-session classes with a constant enrollment, count each person only once. Personal, one-to-one instruction in the use of sources should be counted as reference transactions on line 34. Please indicate if the figure is based on sampling. Use the “Footnotes” section to describe any special situations.
Question 34. Reference Transactions. Report the total number of reference transactions. A reference transaction is
an information contact that involves the knowledge, use, recommendations, interpretation, or instruction in the use of one or more information sources by a member of the library staff. The term includes information and referral service. Information sources include (a) printed and nonprinted material; (b) machine-readable databases (including computer-assisted instruction); (c) the library’s own catalogs and other holdings records; (d) other libraries and institutions through communication or referral; and (e) persons both inside and outside the library. When a staff member uses information gained from previous use of information sources to answer a question, the transaction is reported as a reference transaction even if the source is not consulted again.
If a contact includes both reference and directional services, it should be reported as one reference transaction. Duration should not be an element in determining whether a transaction is a reference transaction. Sampling based on a typical week may be used to extrapolate TO A FULL YEAR for Question 34. Please indicate if the figure is based on sampling.
EXCLUDE SIMPLE DIRECTIONAL QUESTIONS. A directional transaction is an information contact that facilitates the logistical use of the library and that does not involve the knowledge, use, recommendations, interpretation, or instruction in the use of any information sources other than those that describe the library, such as schedules, floor plans, and handbooks.
Questions 35-36. Circulation. For Question 35, count the number of initial circulations during the fiscal year from the general collection for use usually (although not always) outside the library. Do not count renewals. Include circulations to and from remote storage facilities for library users (i.e., do not include transactions reflecting transfers or stages of technical processing). Count the total number of items lent, not the number of borrowers. For Question 36, report total circulation for the fiscal year including initial transactions reported on line 35 and renewal transactions. Exclude reserve circulations; these are no longer reported.
80
Questions 37-38. Interlibrary Loans. Report the number of requests for material (both returnables and non-returnables) provided to other libraries on line 37 and the number of filled requests for material received from libraries or other providers on line 38. On both lines, include originals, photocopies, and materials sent by telefacsimile or other forms of electronic transmission. Include patron-initiated transactions. Do not include transactions between libraries covered by this questionnaire.
Questions 39-40. Ph.D. Degrees. Report the number awarded during the 2001-02 fiscal year. Please note that only the number of Ph.D. degrees are to be counted. Statistics on all other advanced degrees (e.g., D.Ed., D.P.A., M.D., J.D.) should not be reported in this survey. If you are unable to provide a figure for Ph.D.s only, please add a footnote in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire.
Question 40. Ph.D. Fields. For the purposes of this report, Ph.D. fields are defined as the specific discipline specialties enumerated in the U.S. Department of Education’s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) “Completions” Survey. Although the IPEDS form requests figures for all doctoral degrees, only fields in which Ph.D.s are awarded should be reported on the ARL questionnaire. Any exceptions should be footnoted in the “Footnotes” section of the questionnaire.
Question 41. Instructional Faculty. Instructional faculty are defined by the U.S. Dept. of Education as
those members of the instruction/research staff who are employed full-time as defined by the institution, including faculty with released time for research and faculty on sabbatical leave.
Full-time counts generally exclude faculty who are employed to teach fewer than two semesters, three quarters, two trimesters, or two four-month sessions; replacements for faculty on sabbatical leave or leave without pay; faculty for preclinical and clinical medicine; faculty who are donating their services; faculty who are members of military organizations and paid on a different pay scale from civilian employees; academic officers, whose primary duties are administrative; and graduate students who assist in the instruction of courses. Please be sure the number reported, and the basis for counting, are consistent with those for 1998-99 (unless in previous years faculty were counted who should have been excluded according to the above definition). Please footnote any discrepancies.
Questions 42-45. Enrollment. U.S. libraries should use the Fall 2001 enrollment figures reported to the Department of Education on the form entitled “Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, Fall Enrollment 2001.” The line and column numbers on the IPEDS form for each category are noted on the questionnaire. Please check these figures against the enrollment figures reported to ARL last year to ensure consistency and accuracy. Note: In the past, the number of part-time students reported was FTE; the number now reported to IPEDS is a head count of part-time students. Canadian libraries should note that the category “graduate students” as reported here includes all post-baccalaureate students.
Question 46: Basis of Volume Count. A physical count is a piece count; a bibliographic count is a catalog record count.
Question 53. Footnotes. Explanatory footnotes will be included with the published statistics. Reporting libraries are urged to record in the footnote section any information that would clarify the figures submitted, e.g., the inclusion of branch campus libraries (see paragraph six of the "General Instructions" for definition of branch campus libraries). For the first time, the footnotes from the previous year will be presented in the web form. Please update, delete, or leave them unchanged if they remain valid. Note that the number in parentheses refers to the appropriate column on the Library Data Tables in the published ARL Statistics, as well as to the corresponding line number on the questionnaire. Please make an effort to word your footnotes in a manner consistent with notes appearing in the published report, so that the ARL Office can interpret your footnotes correctly.
Submit the completed questionnaire on the web
Please contact Mark Young at (202) 296-2296 or [email protected] for assistance.
81
ARL STATISTICS QUESTIONNAIRE, 2001-02
Please do not leave any lines blank. If an exact figure is unavailable, use “-1” (that is, “U/A”). If the appropriate answer is zero or none, use “0.” For non-university libraries, if a question is not applicable in your library, use “-2” (that is, “N/A”). University libraries should not use –2.
Definitions of the statistical categories used in this questionnaire can be found in Library Statistics, ANSI/NISO Z39.7-1995. (Bethesda, MD: NISO Press, 1997.) Also, see:
Reporting Institution ______Date Returned to ARL ______Report Prepared by (name) ______Title ______Email address______Phone number ______Contact person (if different) ______Title ______Email address______Phone number ______
COLLECTIONS
Volumes in Library: (See instruction Q1-4.)
1a. Volumes held June 30, 2001. (Exclude microforms, uncataloged govt. docs., maps, a/v material. Record figure reported last year or footnote adjusted figure on p. 4.) ______
2. Volumes added during year -- Gross. (See instruction Q2.) (Exclude microforms, uncataloged govt. docs., maps, a/v material.) ______
2a. Volumes withdrawn during year. (Exclude microforms, uncataloged govt. docs., maps, a/v material.) ______
3. Volumes added during year -- Net. (Subtract line 2a from line 2.) ______
1. Volumes held June 30, 2002. (Add line 1a to line 3.) ______
4. Number of monographic volumes purchased. (See instruction Q4.) (Volumes for which expenditures are reported on line 16. Footnote if titles.) ______
Serials: (See instruction Q5-7.)
5. Number of current serials, including periodicals, purchased. ______
6. Number of current serials, including periodicals, received but not purchased (exchanges, gifts, deposits, etc.). (See instruction Q6.) ______
7. Total number of current serials received. (Add line 5 to line 6.) ______
82
(ARL Statistics Questionnaire 2001-02, page 2.)
Other Library Materials: Total number of pieces held June 30, 2002:
8. Microform units. (See instruction Q8.) ______
9. Government documents not counted elsewhere. (See instruction Q9.) ______
10. Computer files. (See instruction Q10.) ______
11. Manuscripts and archives (linear ft.). (See instruction Q11.) ______
Audiovisual materials:
12. Cartographic. 13. Graphic. (See instruction Q12.) ______(See instruction Q13.) ______
14. Audio. 15. Film and Video. (See instruction Q14.) ______(See instruction Q15.) ______
EXPENDITURES (See instruction Q16-27.) Reported in Canadian dollars? ______Yes. ______No.
Library Materials:
16. Monographs. (Expenditures for volumes reported on line 4.) (See instruction Q16.) ______
17. Current serials including periodicals. (See instruction Q17.) ______
18. Other library materials (e.g., microforms, a/v, etc.). (See instruction Q18.) ______
19. Miscellaneous. (All materials fund expenditures not included above.) (See instruction Q19.) ______
20. Total library materials (Add lines 16, 17, 18, 19.) ______
21. Contract binding: (See instruction Q21; also report figure on 2001-02 ARL Preservation Survey) ______
Salaries and Wages: (See instruction Q22-25.)
22. Professional staff. ______
23. Support staff. ______
24. Student assistants. (See instruction Q24-25.) ______
25. Total salaries and wages. (Add lines 22, 23, 24.) ______
26. Other operating expenditures: (See instruction Q26.) ______
27. Total library expenditures: (Add lines 20, 21, 25, 26.) ______
83
(ARL Statistics Questionnaire 2001-02, page 3.)
PERSONNEL (See instruction Q28-31. Round figures to nearest whole number.)
28. Professional staff, FTE. (See instruction Q28.) ______
29. Support staff, FTE. ______
30. Student assistants, FTE. (See instruction Q30.) ______
31. Total FTE staff. (Add lines 28, 29, 30.) ______
INSTRUCTION (See instruction Q32-33.)
32. Number of library presentations to groups (See instruction Q32.) ______
Figure based on sampling? ______Yes. ______No.
33. Number of total participants in group presentations reported on line 32. (See instruction Q33.) ______
Figure based on sampling? ______Yes. ______No.
REFERENCE
34. Number of reference transactions. (See instruction Q34.) ______
Figure based on sampling? ______Yes. ______No.
CIRCULATION (See instruction Q35-36.)
35. Number of initial circulations (excluding reserves). ______
36. Total circulations (initial and renewals, excluding reserves). ______
INTERLIBRARY LOANS (See instruction Q37-38.)
37. Total number of filled requests for materials provided to other libraries. ______
38. Total number of filled requests for materials received from other libraries or providers. ______
PH.D. DEGREES (See instruction Q39-40.)
39. Number of Ph.D.s awarded in FY2001-02. ______
40. Number of fields in which Ph.D.s can be awarded. (See instruction Q40.) ______
84
(ARL Statistics Questionnaire 2001-02, page 4.)
FACULTY (See instruction Q41.)
41. Number of full-time instructional faculty in FY2001-02. ______
ENROLLMENT -- FALL 2001 (TOTALS) (See instruction Q42-45; line numbers refer to IPEDS survey form.)
42. Full-time students, undergraduate and graduate. ______(Add line 8, columns 15 & 16, and line 14, columns 15 & 16).
43. Part-time students, undergraduate and graduate. ______(Add line 22, columns 15 & 16, and line 28, columns 15 & 16).
44. Full-time graduate students. (Line 14, columns 15 & 16.) ______
45. Part-time graduate students. (Line 28, columns 15 & 16.) ______
LOCAL CHARACTERISTICS or ATTRIBUTES
46. Basis of volume count is: _____ Physical. _____ Bibliographic. (See instruction Q46.)
47. Government documents are included in count of Current Serials. _____ Yes. _____ No.
48. Fringe benefits are included in expenditures for salaries and wages. _____ Yes. _____ No.
49. Law Library statistics are included. _____ Yes. _____ No. _____ We do not have a Law Library.
50. Medical Library statistics are included. _____ Yes. _____ No. _____ We do not have a Medical Library.
51. Other main campus libraries included: [list in "Footnotes" below].
52. Branch Campus Libraries. (See paragraph six of the General Instructions.)
Figures include branch CAMPUS libraries: ____ Yes. _____ No. _____ We have only one campus.
If branch campus libraries are included, please specify which campuses in "Footnotes" below.
If branch campus libraries are not included, please specify which campuses in "Footnotes" below.
FOOTNOTES (See instruction Q53.)
53. A copy of your library’s footnotes as they appeared in the published ARL Statistics 2000-01 appears on your library's survey form on the World Wide Web at
Submit the completed questionnaire on the web
Please contact Mark Young at (202) 296-2296 or [email protected] for assistance.
85
FOOTNOTES TO THE ARL STATISTICS, 2001-02
Footnotes may also include errata and corrections to data from prior years not previously reported. Numbers in parentheses refer to columns in Library Data Tables and to Questionnaire numbers.
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
ALABAMA All figures are as of September 30, 2002. 1 Includes government documents since 1996. Pre-1996 documents are not included in the catalog. 5 Includes 4,163 titles from 12 full-text databases. 8 Includes government documents in microformats. 18 Includes Communications Reading Room and Map Library only; the other libraries do not separate expenditures for audiovisual materials and microforms. 19 Includes Center for Research Libraries membership. 20 Increase attributed to variable billing cycles and increased endowment spending. 26 Includes bibliographic utilities, memberships (except CRL), and literature searching. 35, 36 Computer programming problem prevents a complete count of circulation numbers for 2001-02.
ALBERTA All figures are as of March 31, 2002. 4 Past figures were inaccurately reported. Precise number of monographs purchased from 2000-01 unavailable; all monographs purchased are included in gross volumes added (2). 5, 7 Includes government documents. 9 Included in microform units (8). 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $4,091,991; (17) $480,744; (18) U/A; (19) $681,842; (20) $13,254,577; (21) $194,400; (22) $4,352,292; (23) $7,678,060; (24) $977,150; (25) $13,007,502; (26) $2,029,335; (27) $28,485,814. 18 Cannot be disaggregated from monograph expenditures (16) and serial expenditures (17). 19 Will include GST (Goods and Services Tax), postage, courier, and supplies expenditures, as well as membership expenditures not already paid through the materials budget. 30 Figure based on actual hours worked. Prior to 2000-01, figures were based on hours hired to work. 36 Includes journal loans. Excludes reserves from 1999-2000. Reserves also could not be extracted from the total circulation count for 1997-98. 40 Number of Ph.D fields varies from year to year.
ARIZONA Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 4,823,203. Figures include Architecture, Center for Creative Photography, Music, and the Science Engineering Libraries; excludes the Sierra Vista branch campus. Basis of volume count for the Law library is physical, for Main and the Health Sciences libraries the count is bibliographic. 5-7 Law library cannot supply disaggregated data, reports only totals.
ARIZONA STATE Includes ASU East, ASU West, and the University Libraries (Architecture & Environmental Design, Hayden, Music, Noble Science and Engineering), and the Law Library. 19 Includes: memberships for purposes of publications ($120,734); conservation/preservation ($19,877); ILL/Doc Del ($53,816; uncataloged staff office volumes ($371); search services ($268).
AUBURN All figures are as of September 30, 2002 and include Architecture and Veterinary Medicine libraries.
BOSTON Includes Mugar, Theology and Special Collections libraries. 5-7 Law library is unable to separate serials received (7) into serials purchased (5) and not purchased (6). Totals in these categories for the Mugar, STH and Alumni Medical libraries are: (5) 19,649; (6) 4,291. 18 Excludes Law library. 19 Includes Theology library only.
BOSTON COLLEGE Includes Law, Graduate School of Social Work, Burns Rare Books, and Bapst Art libraries, as well as the Educational Resource Center.
87
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
11 Shelves of manuscripts and archives have been moved to remote storage.
BRIGHAM YOUNG Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 3,233,675 to include the Hunter Law Library and bound periodicals that prior to 2001-02 had not been included in BYU's volume counts. All figures are for the calendar year ending December 31, 2001 and now include the Hunter Law Library. 1-3 Significant changes in volumes figures the addition of the Hunter Law Library to the volume totals, as well as bound periodicals that prior to 2001-02 had not been included in BYU's volume counts. 12-15 Figures do not include the Law library. The Law library reports 1,307 in audiovisual materials, but the categories are not separated. 34 Reference transactions for the Law library are based on sampling but reflect less that 1.5% of the total.
BRITISH COLUMBIA All figures are as of March 31, 2002, except where noted. Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 4,731,607, including 625,596 volumes not previously counted. Figures include: Applied Sciences (Engineering) RR, Archaeology RR, Architecture RR, Asian library, Biomedical Branch Library, Botanical Garden Library, Centre for Integrated Computer Systems Research (CICSR) RR, Centre for Teaching and Academic Growth Resource Centre (TAG), Chemistry/Physics RR, Coolie Verner (Adult Education) RR, Crane Resource Centre, David Lam Management Library, Earth and Ocean Sciences RR, Education Library, Fine Arts Library, First Nations House of Learning (Xwi7xwa), Geographic Information Centre, Hamber Library, Language Education Resource Centre, Law Library, MacMillan Library, Main Library, Mathematics Library, Music Library, Museum of Anthropology Library, Psychiatry RR, Rare Books & Special Collections Div., Regent Carey College Library, Robson Square Library, Science and Engineering Div., St. Mark's College Library, St. Paul's Hospital Library, TRIUMF Library, University Archives, Vancouver School of Theology Library, Walter C. Koerner Library, Woodward Biomedical Library. The Medical and Law library statistics cannot be disaggregated from the main statistics. 1-3 The B2B books are now catalogued and accounted for under as volumes held June 30, 2001. 4 Figure is estimated. 7 New base count. Increase due to addition of monographic series, standing orders, inclusion of all membership titles, over 2000 new electronic serials, serials received by exchange, and serials in affiliated libraries. 9 Government documents are included in new base count. Number of uncatalogued pieces unavailable. 10 Increase in number of electronic resources purchased. 16-27 Expenditures are reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $2,905,149; (17) $9,358,634; (18) $482,256; (19) $1,083,174; (20) $13,829,213; (21) $193,382; (22) $7,316,845; (23) $7,639,125; (24) $1,359,800; (25) $16,315,770; (26) $4,671,000; (27) $35,009,365. 18 Includes (expenditures in Canadian dollars): One time expenditure for electronic resources ($81,206); ILL borrowing costs ($89,681); other materials ($38,313); gifts in kind ($273,056). 19 Includes (expenditures in Canadian dollars): Netinfo ($700,000); electronic services ($197,422); electronic document delivery ($185,752). 28 Increase due to the opening of a new branch library at Robson Square, added affiliated libraries, and funding available for term professional positions. 29 Includes 12.16 FTE cost recovery. 30 Includes 7.90 FTE cost recovery. 35, 36 Includes reserve circulation. 39 Figures are for calendar year 2001. 43, 45 Includes continuing part-time graduate students.
BROWN Figures include the John Carter Brown (Main), Rockefeller (Social Sciences and Humanities), Sciences, John Hay (Special Collections), Artslide, Demography, Orwig (Music), and Media Services libraries. The Medical library statistics cannot be disaggregated from the main statistics because the Medical collection is an integral part of the Sciences library. 11 Manuscripts only. 33 Only the John Carter Brown Library keeps statistics on the number of total participants in group library presentations. A figure for all libraries is therefore unavailable. 38 The decrease in Interlibrary Loan requests received from other libraries can be explained by Brown's membership in the Boston Library Consortium Virtual Catalog, the Borrow Direct Ivy League program, and In-Rhode which allow patrons to request interlibrary loans
88
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
directly.
CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 9,211,062 to reflect errors due to doublecounting. 2a 2000-01 figure included transfers among different units. 8-11 Government documents are reported by material type when known, and otherwise as generic "government documents." 10 2000-01 figure was revised downward. 16 Includes expenditures for all library materials except serials. 31 FTE figures include temporary employees, and reflect temporary reductions in hours due to voluntary action by career employees. 36 Renewal information is incomplete; accurate data unavailable. 37 Excludes photocopies provided by authorized document delivery subcontractors (e.g. Boalt Express) who fill requests using UC-Berkeley collections.
CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Figures include Harrison Western Research Center Library in Fair Oaks, California. The basis of volume count in the General library is bibliographic; in the Law library, it is physical. 21 Some past figures were inaccurate. Items included here erroneously are now correctly included with Other Operating Expenditures (26). 34 Law library is based on sampling; general library is based on a count. 35 Includes all libraries. Figure for Health Sciences library and Law library is 40,594. 40-45 Data provided by campus Office of Planning and Budget.
CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 18 Microforms reported by format in (16) and (17).
CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 7,326,056 to delete the minimally cataloged statistics reported incorrectly for several years. 18 Includes the purchase of a special collection for $1.1 million. 20 Increase primarily due to acquisition of a special collection for $1,100,000 and a $759,000 increase in state funding for library materials. 26 Increase reflects a $496,000 expenditure for remodeling and moving expenditures for the Information Systems staff. 30 Estimated based upon an annual salary of $14,500 per student FTE. 30, 31 Student data for portions of the UCLA Library organization whose expenditures are excluded from the ARL surveys were erroneously included in prior years' surveys. The current FTE data are corrected; this resulted in a sharp decrease between 2000-01 and 2001-02 in the student FTE and staff FTE data reported.
CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 7 Includes electronic journals that were not reported in past surveys.
CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Includes Biomedical, Medical Center, Social Sciences and Humanities, Science and Engineering, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, International Relations and Pacific Studies, The Arts Libraries, the Mandeville Special Collections Library, and the Center for Library and Instructional Computing Services (CLICS). 5 Includes 7,024 serial titles with internet access. 6 Includes 3,704 serial titles with internet access. 17 Includes monographic and publisher's series. Includes all formats. Includes electronic databases subscribed to annually. 19 Includes expenditures for database services (literature searches). 25 Funding from contracts and grants caused an increase of 7.45 FTE, equaling $341,077 in salaries and wages. 26 Reflects bookkeeping change: Internal campus departments' funds transferred now identified as expenses. 35, 36 Special Collections procedures for counting circulation were changed to reflect total-items- paged resulting in large decrease.
CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA Bibliographic system does not supply further breakdown. 18 Included in expenditures for monographs (16).
89
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
CANADA INSTITUTE FOR All figures are as of March 31, 2002. As collections have been centralized, the branch SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL libraries previously included in this survey are now virtual. INFORMATION 2 Increase due to a larger number of electronic materials collected. 2a In 1999-2000 the process of closing a branch library was completed; a part of its holdings was transferred to the main library and the remainder was decatalogued. 10 Includes full-text and databases for internal patrons (i.e., researchers at the National Research Council of Canada). Site licenses have been negotiated for NRC and access is via web site, or "virtual library" that is restricted to their use. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $596,313; (17) $11,974,256; (18) U/A; (19) $49,682; (20) $12,620,251; (21) $0; (22) U/A; (23) U/A; (24) U/A; (25) $15,452,912; (26) $14,361,837; (27) $42,435,000.
CASE WESTERN RESERVE 4 Includes volumes the Medical library received through monographic continuations. 5 Excludes the Medical library's monographic continuation titles. 9 Law library includes 99% of the government documents, which were not previously cataloged. 2000-01 figure did not reflect changes in processing. 11 2000-01 figure from the Law library was incorrect. The collection was physically measured to report an accurate figure. 19 Includes: CRL membership ($11,884); ICPSR membership ($11,260); Dialog ($968); document delivery ($186); SPARC membership ($2,500); Council on Social Work Education membership ($300). 21 A deposit was made to General Bookbinding in 2000-01, so bindery expenses for 2001-02 are less than previously reported.
CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES 1-3, 8 Includes an estimated amount of government documents. 12-15 Audiovisual materials are counted with the material they accompany. 18 Includes restricted-fund expenditures, some of which are grant funded. 19 Includes funds for replacement of missing materials and preservation microfilming.
CHICAGO The Medical library data cannot be disaggregated from the Main statistics. 4 Approximately 71% of this total represents a title count. 10-15 Excludes unprocessed and partially processed items. 38 Includes 506 requests filled by the Center for Research Libraries.
CINCINNATI Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,800,305 to adjust for retro conversion and government documents records. Figures exclude Raymond Walters College and Clermont College branch campus libraries unless otherwise noted. The Main library and Law library volume counts are physical. The Medical library's volume count is bibliographic. 2a The increase in withdrawals reflects a large number of netLibrary titles removed from the collection, in addition to cleanup of records of lost material. 4 Decrease from 2000-01 due to a larger than normal number of electronic monographs (mostly netLibrary titles) added to the collection in 2000-01. 9 A large number of government documents are now cataloged and counted as volumes held. 23 Decrease due to the retirements of some long-term employees. 24 Increase as a result of the University system now tracking work-study funding. 30 More effective use of work-study has augmented the number of student assistants. 37 The increase in this figure is due to an expected increase in PCirc activity. In alternate fiscal years, the probability of the University of Cincinnati being selected as the lender or borrower changes from low to high due to an algorithm used by OhioLINK to calculate data and improve reporting methodology. The algorithm change accounts for the increase in 2001-02.
COLORADO Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,978,490. 2 2000-01 figure was incorrect, including 36,479 extra volumes. Current figure is accurate. 19 Includes: Archives newsletters ($3,869); bibliographic utilities ($312,630); cataloging records for government publications ($8,932); ILL ($33,533); Marcive shipping labels for government publications ($3,895); memberships ($194,417); moving and freight charges for collections ($2,623); off-site storage ($200,000); Perry Como miscellaneous ($210); prospector maintenance ($6,373); III LC Authority Files ($5,900).
90
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
COLORADO STATE 1-3 Due to flood projects, withdrawals exceeded the gross number of volumes added for 2001- 02. 2 Includes 27,585 volumes from a flood project that were inadvertently excluded in past years.
COLUMBIA Figures exclude the Center for Research on Information Access (CRIA) and Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia (EPIC). The basis of the Law library volume count is bibliographic. 1-8 Includes government documents. 4 Law library reported number of titles purchased, not number of volumes. 18, 19 Included in monograph expenditures (16).
CONNECTICUT Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 3,045,593 to include a corrected volume count for the Law library. Figures include the Art & Design, Culpeper Media, Dodd Research Center, Maps, Music & Dramatic Arts, and Pharmacy libraries, and the branch campuses at Avery Point, Greater Hartford, Stamford, Torrington, and Waterbury. 6 Increase due to State provided electronic resources. 22, 23 Disaggregated figures are unavailable.
CORNELL Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 6,807,247. Figures include the Africana, Engineering, Fine Arts, Hotel, Kroch (Rare & Mss. Coll.), Law, Management, Mathematics, Music, Olin/Kroch (Asia Coll.), Physical Sciences, Uris, Industrial & Labor Relations, Mann/Entomology, and Veterinary Medicine Libraries on the main campus, and the New York Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva, NY. Figures exclude the Medical College library in New York, NY. 11 Manuscripts and archives reported in cubic feet. 2000-01 figure revised to 58,626. 22, 23 Amounts reflect reclassification of non-academic exempt staff from "professional" to "support". 28, 31 Includes professional staff, support staff, and student assistants on grants and projects. 36 Includes reserves; excludes e-reserve transactions. 41 Faculty count includes only full, associate, and assistant professors. Excludes faculty at the Medical division in New York City. 42-45 Excludes Medical division in New York City and students registered in absentia.
DELAWARE 11 Excludes the University Archives, which is not administered by the main library. 22, 23, 25 Excludes professional and support staff in Information Technologies assigned to the library. 27 Excludes $502,100 grant for the provision of electronic library resources to public schools.
DUKE Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 5,131,816 to include 22,528 e-books added to the collection in 2000-01 but not reported in 2000-01. 3, 4 Includes 3,691 e-books purchased in 2001-02. 11-15 Includes materials in the University Archives, which were officially incorporated into the library system in 2001. Their collections were excluded in previous ARL reports. 22, 24-27 Increases due to inclusion of Center for Information Technology for the first time and the Academic Investment Proposals that have added additional activity in Curriculum 2000, Digital Library, Technology Flexibility, and Library Service Center. 35, 36 Includes some reserve circulations.
EMORY Figures include the Health Sciences Center, Hugh MacMillan (Law), Oxford College, and Pitts (Theology) libraries, and the branch campus libraries at Grady Hospital and the Medical School. 2a In 2001-02, a concerted effort to deaccession extremely dated materials was undertaken, including withdrawing print copies of many resources for which electronic editions are now used (e.g. back serial runs of journals covered by JSTOR). This effort resulted in the shift between the current figure and figures from past years. 18, 26 Figures reflect the funding of many library collection initiatives "off budget," through the one-time allocation of funds to purchase or support campus access to various information resources. 41 2000-01 figure covered Arts & Sciences only, and omitted all professional schools and medical faculty. This mistake has been corrected in the current figure.
91
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
FLORIDA Figures include all Gainesville, FL campus libraries: Marston (Science), Architecture/Fine Arts, Journalism, Music, Education, Law, and Health Science Center. Also includes the Health Science library facility in Jacksonville, FL. 18, 19, 30 State budget cuts (recalls) during the year resulted in reductions. 22, 23 Includes salary paid by grants and auxiliary enterprises. 26 2000-01 figure revised to $3,323,621. 27 2000-01 figure revised to $25,422,205. 41 Incorrect data was reported in previous years. Revised figures from Division of Institutional Research UF Factbook, Table iii-2, regular faculty heading, are: 2000-01, 2,887; 1999-2000, 2,843; 1998-99, 2,801. 42-45 Data was not reported correctly in previous years. Revised figures from IPEDS data are, for 2000-01: (42) 39,138; (43) 5,976; (44) 9,686; (45) 2,748; for 1999-2000: (42) 37,962; (43) 5,420; (44) 9,320; (45) 2,429; for 1998-99: (42) 36,919; (43) 5,417; (44) 8,388; (45) 2,471.
FLORIDA STATE Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,446,458 to include bibliographic count of 4,811 government documents previously counted in (9). Figures include the Strozier, Dirac (Science), Music, Information Studies, Pepper, Law, and Medical libraries, the branch campus in Panama City (holdings and materials expenditures only), and the Ringling Museum of Art Library in Sarasota, FL. Figures exclude the Developmental Research School. 4 Excludes Law library. Includes 41,290 e-book titles purchased from NetLibrary, Early English Books Online (EEBO), and Evans Digital Collection. 8 Includes 42,948 pieces omitted in 2000-01. 9 Adjusted figure reflects reduction in piece count due to inclusion of some government documents in volume count. 16 Includes e-books purchased by library ($366,010) and monographs purchased with gift/endowment funds ($3,812). 17 Medical library expenses for 2-year subscriptions (2001-03) reported in 2000-01 figure. 19 Main, Science, Music, and Information Studies libraries only: Includes database access ($282,977) and document delivery/ILL ($58,618). Law library only: Includes databases ($154,650) and bibliographic services ($7,073). Medical library only: Includes document delivery and ILL ($1,375) and databases ($10,999). Ringling Museum of Art reports $0. 26 Includes funds from gift/endowment/Friends accounts ($11,069). 28 Includes 1 position funded with non-library funds. 29 Includes 2 positions funded with non-library funds. 32 Medical library figure only based on sampling. 34 Medical library reference services began in March 2002. 35, 36 Medical library circulation services began in March 2002. Ringling Museum of Art Library had no circulation of materials. 37, 38 During the publication process, these figures were revised to: (37) 17,871; (38) 15,942.
GEORGE WASHINGTON Includes Gelman (main), Himmelfarb (medical), and Burns (law) libraries on the main campus, and the Mt. Vernon and Ashburn departmental libraries. The basis of volume count for Main library and Medical library is physical; for Law library, it is bibliographic. 2 Main library figures now include government documents volumes and an adjustment of 3,096 records which were added during an inventory project. 2a Main library's figures reflect an inventory project, ongoing since July 2001, resulting in 6,528 volumes being "withdrawn". 4, 16, 17, 27 Main library received an additional $1,000,000 applied to collections expenditures. 4 Law library data unavailable. 5-7 Law library was unable to disaggregate 5,373 total serials into categories for (5) and (6). Totals for all other libraries are: (5) 9,342; (6) 1,923. 6 Main library figures excludes gifts, which are counted with serials and monographs. 8 Medical library reports 0. 9 All three libraries report 0. 11, 12 Law and Medical libraries report 0. 13 Law library figure is 0. 14 Medical library figure includes items in historical collection not previously reported. 16, 17 In 2000-01, the Medical library's expenditures for monographs (16) and serials (17) were
92
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
mistakenly switched. Current figures are accurate. 18 Main library includes these figures in (17). 19 Main library only: Includes Lexis-Nexis ($23,804); Capcon ($131,742); WRLC ($521,816); database fees ($46,700); SPARC membership ($5,000); postage ($92,227). Law library only: Includes database fees ($59,078). 22 Includes salaries for 6 professional classified and ungraded staff previously reported as support staff (23). 23 Includes temporary staff. 25 All library staff received a market adjustment in July 2001 ($2000 for full-time positions and $1000 for part-time positions). 29 Includes 3.0 FTE cost-recovery positions, 6 FTE shelvers, and other temporary staff (including consultants) for Main library. 31 Includes 3.0 FTE cost-recovery positions for Main library. 32 Law library data unavailable. 33 Law library data unavailable. Medical library did not use sampling. 34 Law library data unavailable. Main library figure is based on sampling for some departments, and on actual counts for others. 47 Medical library does not include government documents in count of current serials.
GEORGETOWN Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,234,338 due to a Medical library adjustment following migration to a new library system. Figures include the Woodstock Theological Library and the Bioethics Library. 32 Increased customized small presentations.
GEORGIA Includes Law library, Science library, and the CMC. 5-7 Increase due to the Law library, which did not include figures in the past. 13 Includes first time prints/photos. 32, 33 Figure for Law library is based on sampling. 34 Figure for Law library is based on a physical count.
GEORGIA TECH Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,196,334. Some withdrawn items were mistakenly subtracted twice in 2000-01. 1-3, 5-7 Includes government documents that are cataloged, classified, and housed separately. 27 A major renovation project resulted in significantly higher total library expenditures than in previous years. 36 Data previously available to compute this figure are no longer available, following transfer of circulation, bibliographic, and other data to integrated library system Voyager.
GUELPH All figures are as of April 30, 2002, unless otherwise noted. Figures include Ontario Veterinary College Learning Commons, and exclude the Alfred College, Kemptville College and Ridgetown College branch campus libraries. 4 Estimate based on number of 'book trucks' of material processed and average number of monographs per 'truck'. Includes all numbered and unnumbered monographic series. 5 Value determined using methodology of previous years. It will be reexamined in coming months. 6 This is the number of free electronic journals available through the Library's web site. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $799,044; (17) $2,879,223; (18) $9,993; (19) $362,093; (20) $4,050,353; (21) $57,012; (22) $2,009,513; (23) $2,896,399; (24) $245,773; (25) $5,151,685; (26) $815,213; (27) $10,074,263. 19 Includes (expenditures in Canadian dollars): Archival ($16,938); data processing ($26,047); DD/ILL ($152,241); storage ($5,328); TUG book and retrieval system ($76,406); monographs GST ($635); Serials GST ($8,985); mono handling ($20,756); serials handling ($39,725); monogr PST ($139); serials PST ($3913); freight ($10,980). 35-36 Doesn't include circulation figures for Archives and Special Collections. 39 Figure is for the period from November 1, 2001 until October 31, 2002. 41 Figure is as of September, 2002. 42-45 Figures are as of November 1, 2002.
93
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
HARVARD Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 14,615,391. Figures include the Medicine and Law Schools, and research institutions in the District of Columbia and Italy. All PhDs are awarded through the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. 1, 2 Includes some government documents. 7 Includes some government documents; excludes some international government documents. Revised serial counts due in part to recounts and changes in accounting procedures. 19 Increase results from changes in accounting procedures in some libraries. 27 Separate figures for expenditures from grants and special projects are not available. Excludes fringe benefits ($13,266,428) and buildings and maintenance ($10,554,592) charged to library budget. Total cost recovery amounts to approximately $8,173,892. This includes HOLLIS and Harvard Depository expense recovery as well as other income items. 37 Excludes items requested by faculty libraries from Harvard Depository. 41 Figure represents total headcount. Separate figures for all full and part-time positions unavailable.
HAWAII 2a Following migration to a new library management system, cataloging was able to catch up on backlog of withdrawal activity. 4 Online acquisition system reveals this number, which may need to be audited. 17 Library received substantial increase in materials funds, most of which went to electronic resources. 22 Increase reflects collective bargaining increase for library faculty. 26 Includes one time equipment money to be used in newly opened addition to the Library. 35 Initial circulations increased with re-opening of main library building following renovation. 38 Due to budget restrictions, subsidized interlibrary loan from Uncover was dropped halfway through the year.
HOUSTON All figures are as of August 31, 2002. Figures include O'Quinn Law, Art and Architecture, Music, Optometry, and Pharmacy libraries, and exclude branch campus libraries in Clear Lake, Victoria, Sugarland, and Downtown Houston. 5-7 Law library can only provide aggregate count for current serials received (7). All other libraries report: (5) 14,952; (6) 1,977. 32, 33 Counts for Law library are unavailable.
ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 2-4 Decreases reflect an increased percentage of the budget devoted to serials. 2a Decrease reflects completion of a major project in the previous year. 10 New online system allows for a more accurate count of computer files. 13 Chicago in the Year 2000 (CITY2000) collection of 500,000 photographic negatives added. 18 Decrease reflects drop in number of microforms purchased. 21 Fewer dollars budgeted for binding. 32, 33 Fewer registrants led to fewer classes. 37 Improved Web-based catalog and easier access for consortial partners resulted in a return to mid-1990s levels of lending.
ILLINOIS, URBANA Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 9,709,144. 19 Includes: Postage/freight ($181,633); ILL ($26,908); handling ($82,783); document delivery ($35,040); Document Express ($1,985); online non-recoverable reference services ($15,884); interdisciplinary electronic resources ($819,110); late fees ($1,582); and taxes ($7). 22 Includes $7,243,420 academic and $1,362,724 graduate assistants. 28 Includes 50 FTE graduate assistants. 33 Figure is comprised of exact numbers and estimates, depending on individual units reporting.
INDIANA Figures include the Law Library at Bloomington, the Archives of Traditional Music, and the Kinsey Institute, and exclude the branch campuses at Indianapolis (IUPUI), Ft. Wayne, Kokomo, South Bend, Gary, New Albany, Richmond, and Columbus. 2 SIRSI Unicorn catalog system active for full year as opposed to 2000-01 when the new system was brought up mid-year. 14 Includes items previously not reported by a unit.
94
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
35 System reporting error discovered for 2000-01 revising figure to an estimated 700,000. Electronic renewals changing circulation counts. 36 System reporting error discovered for 2000-01; revising figure to an estimated 1,055,698. 37 Began reporting ILL photocopies of non-circulating materials in 2000-01. During 2001-02, this figure represented 31,392 photocopies, microfilm images, photos and audio items. 40 Count as of October 2001; earlier count not available.
IOWA 1-3 Excludes annuals and proceedings. 2 Increase due to a retrospective cataloging project in government publications and cataloging. 4 Increase due to ease of processing materials within our new LMS. Law library figure is estimated. 5 Law library includes subscriptions, not titles. 6 Law library includes government document serials. 9 Decrease due to retro cataloging project and the ARL definitions concerning cataloged Marcive materials. This adjustment fixes past errors. 16 Law library figure is estimated. 17 Decrease due to more accurate classification of materials within the LMS, thereby increasing other material expenditures. 18 Increase due to more accurate classification of materials within the LMS, thereby decreasing serial expenditures. Figure also includes electronic materials. 19 Law library figure includes databases. 20 Law library figure includes $16,820 project to bind legislative journal gifts. 22 Law library figure excludes Associate Dean. 26 Law library figure includes cost of replacing staff computers as well as postage, phones, supplies, equipment, travel, memberships, etc. 26 Decrease due to budget cuts during the fiscal year, the completion of a major portion of a retrospective conversion project, and the completion of automation conversion to a new LMS. 29 Law library lost 0.5 support position due to State budget cuts. 31 Law library excludes .5 FTE Associate Dean of Research in Law. 34 Law library figure based on two weekly surveys taken each year and then multiplied for law library. 41 Excludes 556 clinical and pre-clinical faculty with departmental appointments.
IOWA STATE 2, 2a The formula (5.2 document pieces per volume) was used to estimate the number of government documents. 5-7 Past surveys were based on hand counts made as titles were added or cancelled. Current figure is the first done almost completely by automation, and is more accurate than earlier counts.
JOHNS HOPKINS Figures include Eisenhower Library, Welch Medical Library, Institute for History of Medicine, School of Hygiene and Public Health Library, Peabody Conservatory Library, Applied Physics Laboratory, School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) in Washington, DC and Bologna, Italy, the Center for Italian Studies in Florence, Italy, the Montgomery County Center in Rockville, MD, the School of Professional Studies in Business and Education in Columbia, MD and downtown Baltimore Center, the Homewood Campus, East Baltimore (Health) Campus and Montgomery County Campus. Data from the Applied Physics Laboratory Library covers the calendar year ending December 31, 2001. Figures exclude the School of Advanced International Studies in Nanjing, China. 19 Includes literature searching and postage for library materials. 42 2000-01 figure revised to 9,162. 43 2000-01 figure revised to 8,721.
KANSAS Figures include Regents Center Library Edwards Campus in Overland Park, KS, and exclude the University of Kansas School of Medicine Farha Library in Wichita, KS. 2 Used ARL formula of 5.2 document pieces per volume for document serials added to collection. 4 Volume count is not available; figure reflects number of monographic titles purchased. 19 Includes ILL shipping costs, fees for ILL loans and copies, commercial document delivery services, memberships and OCLC costs.
95
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
28 Includes one staff member funded by grant for special project.
KENT STATE Figures include the College of Education, Instructional Resource Center, and the branch campuses at Ashtabula, Geauga, East Liverpool, Salem, Stark, Trumbull, and Tuscarawas. 16-31 Expenditures and personnel figures include Audiovisual Services and Teleproductions.
KENTUCKY 5 2000-01 figure contained an error of 3,251 extra serials. Decrease in the current figure reflects the correction. 22-27 Student Computing Services (and their funding) transferred from Library to Fiscal Affairs and Information Technology.
LAVAL All figures are as of May 31, 2002. The Medical and Law statistics cannot be disaggregated from main library statistics. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $2,811,490; (17) $4,322,476; (18) $74,589; (19) $0; (20) $7,208,555; (21) U/A; (22) $3,442,127; (23) $5,483,078; (24) $69,703; (25) $8,994,908; (26) $570,527; (27) $16,773,990. 21 All binding has been done in-house in 2001-02.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS All figures are as of September 30, 2002. 2 An arrearage reduction effort is underway; as a result, this figure includes many acquisitions from prior years. 5-7 The counts for current serials received, including periodicals, can only be estimated. 16-19 Breakdown of expenditures by format is not currently available.
LOUISIANA STATE Includes the School of Veterinary Medicine. 5, 6 Unable to determine which serials are not purchased. 35, 36 Decreases due to the increasing use of electronic resources.
LOUISVILLE Includes the Kersey Science and Engineering Library, the Music library, the Art library, the University archives, the Law library (except for use statistics), and the Kornhauser Health Sciences Library.
McGILL All figures are as of May 31, 2002 and include the Macdonald Campus. 4, 16 Includes numbered monograph series and their expenditures. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $4,373,963; (17) $5,583,566; (18) $2,358,549; (19) $197,147; (20) $12,513,225; (21) $195,360; (22) $4,044,741; (23) $5,612,284; (24) $853,508; (25) $10,510,533; (26) $2,691,565; (27) $25,910,683. 38 Includes unmediated, subsidized, patron-initiated borrowing.
McMASTER Includes the Mills Memorial Library, the H.G. Thode Science & Engineering Library, the Innis Library, and the Health Sciences Library. 2a, 3 Shifts due to Health Sciences Library weeding 9,364 textbooks in 2000-01. 4, 10 Increases due to improved accuracy in counting methods. 15 Decrease due to Health Sciences Library withdrawing out-of-date material. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $1,206,983; (17) $5,921,421; (18) U/A; (19) $25,303; (20) $7,153,707; (21) $186,138; (22) $1,994,121; (23) $3,994,167; (24) $182,654; (25) $6,170,942; (26) $894,522; (27) $14,405,309. 19 Increase due to additional appraisals done in 2001-02. 23 Increase due to contract settlement, which resulted in backpay. 28-31 2000-01 figures revised to: (28) 32; (29) 113; (30) 14; (31) 159.
MANITOBA All figures are as of March 31, 2002 and include the William R. Newman (Agriculture), Architecture/Fine Arts, D.S. Woods (Education), Elizabeth Dafoe, Donald W. Craik (Engineering), Neil John Maclean (Health Sciences), St. Boniface Hospital, Victoria General Hospital, E.K. Williams (Law), Albert D. Cohen (Management), Eckhardt-Grammatte (Music), St. John's College, Fr. Harold Drake, and Sciences & Technology libraries. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $1,250,003; (17) $4,548,461; (18) U/A; (19) $472,666; (20) $6,271,130; (21) $159,358; (22) $3,366,424; (23) $4,434,857; (24) $411,338; (25) $8,212,619; (26) $1,335,506; (27) $15,978,613.
96
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
MARYLAND 35, 36 Excludes reserve circulations, which causes initial and total circulations figures to be identical.
MASSACHUSETTS Includes the Biological Sciences Library and the Physical Sciences & Engineering Library. 6, 7 2000-01 figures have been revised downward to reflect improvements in serials control statistics. Current figures represent a new base for future additions/cancellations. 24 Includes federal share of work study funds. 37 Excludes items provided via ILS to four partner institutions. 38 Excludes items received via ILS from four partner institutions. 39 Excludes Ed.D. degrees awarded. 40 Excludes 1 Ed.D. program.
MIT Includes holdings of all campus libraries: 5 Divisional libraries, 5 Branch libraries and the Institute Archives, as well as collections in on-campus and off-site storage. Includes the holdings of all campus libraries that are part of the MIT Libraries system. 1-3, 6-8 Includes government documents. 19 Includes postage ($29,642). 28 5 FTE professional are grant-funded; 2 FTE professional are cost-recovery; 9.75 support staff are cost-recovery.
MIAMI All figures are as of May 31, 2002, except where indicated, and include the Otto G. Richter Library (central library), its branches (architecture, business, math, and music), and the law, marine, and medical libraries at the University of Miami. The medical and marine libraries were erroneously reported as "branch campus libraries" in prior years (the medical and marine campuses of the University of Miami are within a reasonable commuting distance, so do not conform to the NCES definition of "branch institution"). 4 In 2001-02 the number of volumes purchased was obtained from acquisitions records for the central library; in 2000-01 and 1999-2000 the number of monographic volumes was computed from the number of purchased volumes added to the online catalog and may not correspond to the expenditures reported for (16). 5 Includes purchased print and electronic subscriptions with no equivalent print version, except for medical and marine libraries, which include print subscriptions only. 6 Includes print and electronic subscriptions with equivalent print versions because it was not possible to separate electronic journals for which there were additional costs from electronic journals that are free with print subscriptions; medical and marine libraries include print subscriptions only. 12 2000-01 figure incorrect due to double-counting for marine library collection; correct total should be 41,852, not 44,484 as reported. 12-15 Materials from central library's archives & special collections and Cuban heritage collection are not included. Medical library reports all 2,833 audio-visual materials in (15). 17 Medical and marine libraries expenditures include only print titles. 18 Figures for the law and marine libraries cannot be disaggregated from expenditures included in (16) and (17). 22 Excludes salaries of the University Librarian and Director of the law library; includes salaries of 9 non-librarian professionals in central library. 23 Includes casual labor. 24 Includes graduate assistant stipends, but not tuition credits paid in lieu of salary. In 2000-01 student assistant wages for computer services in central library were not included; corrected total should be $657,112, not $549,862 as reported. 26 Includes $196,032 capital equipment purchases, $59,643 grant operating expense, and $72,815 expense for computer services for central library. In 2000-01 computer services equipment and operating expenses were not included; corrected total should be $2,208,805, not $1,922,919 as reported. 28 Includes University Librarian and 9 non-librarian professional positions in central library. Three FTE professional staff are grant-supported. 29 Includes casual labor 3 FTE and grant-supported 3 FTE for central library. 30 In 2000-01, 9 FTE student assistants in computer services for central library were not included; corrected total should be 33 FTE, not 24 FTE as reported. 32, 33 Figures based on actual counts in all libraries except marine library, which is based on an estimate of 40 sessions and 300 participants.
97
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
34 Reference transactions total is based on samples in law, marine, and medical libraries. For central library reference transactions are enumerations for the government information/special formats and main reference service points and samples for the archives & special collections and Cuban heritage collection service points. Reference transactions for the architecture library are unavailable. 39 There were 97 Ph.D.s awarded between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002. 40 Figure represents fall 2001. 2000-01 figure revised to 44 fields in which Ph.D.s could be awarded.
MICHIGAN Figures include the Bentley Historical Library, William L. Clements Library, Law library, Kresge Business Administration Library, and the University Library. Figures exclude the libraries at University of Michigan-Dearborn and the University of Michigan-Flint. 1-3, 5-8 Includes government documents. 4 Reflects volumes, not titles, count. 5-6 Disaggregated figures unavailable. Law library could only provide estimated figures. 10 Includes counts from Digital Library Program. 11 2000-01 figure revised to 23,794. 13 Includes counts from Digital Library Program, such as page images and continuous tone digital images. 16-20 Figures for the William L. Clements Library are estimated. 17 Includes microform serials. 22 Includes wages for librarians only. 23 Includes wages for Professional/Administrative and Clerical categories. 25 Only aggregate data available for Business and Law library. 40 Includes PhD. fields only; professional degrees and individualized program degrees are excluded.
MICHIGAN STATE Excludes the Detroit College of Law library on the Michigan State University campus. The basis for volume count is physical; in 2000-01 and 1999-2000 it was erroneously reported as bibliographic. 2 2000-01 figure revised to 88,220. 2a 2000-01 figure revised to 27,764. 5-7 Includes monographic series that cannot be disaggregated. 17 Includes expenditures for monographic series that cannot be disaggregated. 18 Included in monograph expenditures (16) and current serials expenditures (17). 22-24, 28-30 Includes grant and revenue accounts. 30 Includes graduate assistants. 34 Includes 9,000 off-desk reference queries (based on tallies and sampling). 37, 38 2000-01 figures revised to: (37) 39,764; (38) 28,598.
MINNESOTA Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 5,986,640 to reflect shelf counts in several areas. Figures exclude the branch campuses at Crookston, Duluth, and Morris. 4 Figure reflects titles, not volumes. 9 Government documents reduced by 2,285 physical units added to OPAC. 13-15 Disaggregated figures unavailable. Total audiovisual is 857,476. 31 FTE figures represent filled positions only. 34 Figure represents a combination of actual counts and sampling.
MISSOURI Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 3,074,842 to include 14,333 Government documents converted to OPAC. 5 Does not include number of serial titles from U-Wide Library Systems Office, nor does it include a large number of other e-serials. 9 Includes government documents converted, and correcting for previous overstatement based on shelf measurement. 17 Includes $618,736 of University-wide (4-campus system) Library Systems Office expenditures. 22 Includes $186,724 from University-wide Library Systems Office expenditures.
98
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
23 Includes $10,597 from University-wide Library Systems Office expenditures. 26 Includes $143,546 from University-wide Library Systems Office expenditures. 28 Includes 4 professional staff from University-wide Library Systems Office expenditures. 29 Includes 1 University-wide Library Systems office position. 32, 33 Law library data was based on sampling; all other libraries do actual counts of this data.
MONTREAL All figures are as of May 31, 2002 and include Université de Montréal Libraries, École Polytechnique Library and École des Hautes Études Commerciales Library except where indicated. Volumes held May 31, 2001 revised to 3,163,520 due mainly to an adjustment brought to the total volume count of the Didacthèque. The École Polytechnique Library does not include government documents in serials count; all other libraries do. 3 Increase due to a larger acquisitions budget and a more precise count of the serial volumes. 16-27 Expenditures are reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $2,187,167; (17) $7,755,059; (18) U/A; (19) $119,059; (20) $10,061,285; (21) $218,160; (22) $5,557,627; (23) $8,265,451; (24) $37,832; (25) $13,860,910; (26) $1,462,613; (27) $25,602,968. 24, 30 A different understanding of the definition explains a major decrease for student assistants and explains partly an increase for professional and support staffs.
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL All figures are as of September 30, 2002 and exclude USDA field libraries. LIBRARY 1-3, 5-8 Includes government documents. 12-15 Figures represent title counts, not piece counts. 18 Figure represents preservation microfilm service copies. 35, 36 Decrease in circulation may be due to increased electronic availability of materials.
NATIONAL LIBRARY OF CANADA All figures are as of March 31, 2002. 1 Figures are estimated. 1-4 Excludes government documents. 4, 5 In addition to monographs purchased, two copies of documents published in Canada are received on legal deposit. 6 Includes all active serials (non-government, Canadian federal and provincial government and Unesco), which are counted as copies. The concept of "copy" is equivalent to a subscription. 15 Figure is the result of an actual count; figures from previous years were estimated. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $498,908; (17) $641,990; (18) $892,585; (19) $98,714; (20) $2,132,197; (21) $14,164; (22) $14,462,354; (23) $10,255,414; (24) $135,300; (25) $24,853,068; (26) $12,022,364; (27) $39,021,793. 16, 17 Canadian monographs and serials are received on legal deposit. Excludes materials purchased for staff as working copies. 18 Increase due to supplementary funding at year end. 19 Includes increased contract binding, flood recovery, with supplemental funding. 28-31 Professional staff & support staff includes I.T.S. supporting National Archives. 36 Renewals not counted.
NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE All figures are as of September 30, 2002. Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,384,484. 5 Figure includes subscriptions, not titles. 11 2000-01 figure revised to 1,846. 32, 33 Includes a new program of educational tours. 34 Excludes "junk" mail.
NEBRASKA Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,670,046. 4, 9-11 Figures unavailable for Law library. 6, 7 Includes government documents. 12, 13 Law library reported 0. For other libraries, figure includes only those government documents cataloged using OCLC. 14, 15 Includes only those government documents cataloged using OCLC.
99
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
26 2000-01 figure revised to 1,005,137. 27 2000-01 figure revised to 12,488,550. 29 Includes 3.00 FTE temporary appointment. 32 Decrease in number of library presentations to groups reflects change in for-credit library instruction course.
NEW MEXICO Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,411,496. Volumes held June 30, 2000 revised to 2,347,781. Figures include the following main campus libraries: Bainbridge Bunting Memorial Slide Library, MEC/Equity Library, Tireman Learning Materials Library, and Native American Studies Center Library. Figures exclude the following branch campus libraries: Gallup Branch Campus Library, Harwood Foundation, Los Alamos Branch Campus Library, Santa Fe Graduate Center Library, Taos Education Center, and Valencia Branch Campus. Statistical reporting procedures were revised to include only those projects for which the General Library was responsible during 2001-02. Responsibility for the Center for Southwest Research and the Center for Academic Program Support was moved to other departments for Fiscal 2001-02; therefore, their data were not included in these statistics. 2 2000-01 figure revised to 69,141. 2a 2000-01 figure revised to 5,426. 3 2000-01 figure revised to 63,715.
NEW YORK All figures as of August 31, 2002 and include Elmer Holmes Bobst Library, Institute of Fine Arts, Real Estate Institute, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Kriser Dental Center, Ehrman Medical Library, and the Law School Library. Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 4,022,275. 5, 6 2000-01 figures revised to: (5) 24,142; (6) 9,263. 8 2000-01 figure revised to 4,631,113. 16 Increase due to the fact that expenditures in this category took a dip in 2000-01, and returned to normal in 2001-02. 23 2000-01 figure revised to $7,154,103 to include $201,936 of federal funding. 29 Increase from 2000-01 is due to a new method of calculating FTE of casual employees. 32 2000-01 figure revised to 769. 42-45 2000-01 figures revised to: (42) 26,659; (43) 10,491; (44) 10,159; (45) 8,363.
NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY 1-3, 5-8 Includes government documents. 5-7 Since 1996-97 this figure has represented additions, not cumulative totals. 22-23 Expenditures for salaries for both professional and support staff is $27,345,834. Disaggregated figures not available. 26 Figure for operating expenditures is lower due to erroneous reporting in 2000-01 and to the conclusion of several large grant funded projects.
NEW YORK STATE LIBRARY All figures are as of March 31, 2002. The Medical and Law library statistics cannot be disaggregated from the main statistics, as the Medical and Law collections are an integral part of the main library.
NORTH CAROLINA Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 5,234,873. Figures include the Institute of Marine Sciences Library. 1-3, 5-8 Includes government documents. 12 Reduction in cartographic holdings reflects major weeding project begun in 2001-02. 19 Includes payments for CRL membership. 27 Includes $6,294,974 in grants, trust and other special funds. Excludes $438,848 in expenditures for the Triangle Research Libraries Network from funds contributed by Duke, North Carolina State, and North Carolina Central universities. 28-31 Includes 0.8 FTE professionals on special grant funds. Excludes 2.5 FTE paid from funds contributed by Duke, North Carolina State, and North Carolina Central universities for support of the Triangle Research Libraries Network.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE Includes Design, Natural Resources, Textiles, and Veterinary Medical libraries. 4 Includes some monographic standing order items paid from serials funds.
100
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
16-17 Some monographic titles are paid from serials funds included in (17). 19 Includes bibliographic utilities ($152,161), document delivery ($89,489), and memberships ($207,380). 34 Based on sampling by most departments.
NORTHWESTERN All figures are as of August 31, 2002 and include the Science & Engineering, Math, and Geology libraries, and the Law, Health Sciences and Schaffner (business) libraries on the Chicago campus. 1-3 Includes government documents. 11 Excludes Law and Health Sciences libraries. 13 Excludes Health Sciences library.
NOTRE DAME 4, 18, 32-34 Figures unavailable for Law library. 11, 13 Figures unavailable for the Main libraries. Law library reported 0. 12 Figure represents the Main libraries only. Law library reported 0. 19 Represents acquisitions freight costs only, which were previously reported as "other" materials (18). Document delivery costs were transferred from the acquisitions to the operating budget in 2001-02.
OHIO Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,346,501. Figures include the Music/Dance Library, the Library Annex, the Chemistry Reading Room, the Mathematics Reading Room, and the Chillicothe, Eastern, Lancaster, Southern, and Zanesville branch campuses. 18 Includes expenditures for electronic journals, videos, database access fees, film and video rental fees, microforms, AV materials, and computer CDs. 19 Includes expenditures for document delivery services and consortial borrowing dues (CRL). 24 Includes regular student wages, federal work-study, and PACE support.
OHIO STATE Figures include: Biological Sciences/Pharmacy; Business; Cartoon Research; Children's Hospital; Education, Human Ecology, Psychology, and Social Work; Fine Arts; Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences; Geology; Health Sciences; Journalism; Law; Music/Dance; Science & Engineering; Theatre Research Institute; University Archives; and Veterinary Medicine libraries. Figures exclude the Lima, Mansfield, Marion, and Newark Regional Campuses, the Agricultural Technical Institute and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center in Wooster. 4 Includes nearly 12,000 e-books and over 80,000 titles in microformat which do not have item records generated for counting in the machine-generated volume count used for (2). 9 Count previously included hearings, which are being discarded. 14 Includes Audio, Film and Video. 16 Reserve funds were used to purchase additional monographic materials. 18, 19 Expenditures for all types of library materials are reflected in (16) and (17). 37, 38 Figures include materials loaned and borrowed via the OhioLINK statewide system.
OKLAHOMA 2 Increase due to the addition of 13,000 e-books and 4,000 microforms and microfiche to the collection. 4 Increase due to the addition of 13,000 e-books to the collection. 5 Increase due to the inclusion of e-journals for the first time, and to a more complete counting procedure. 6 Increase due to the inclusion of government documents in electronic formats for the first time.
OKLAHOMA STATE Figures include the Edmon Low (main) Library, the Architecture, Curriculum Materials, and Veterinary Medicine libraries, and the OSU branch campuses in Oklahoma City, Okmulgee, and Tulsa (Tulsa campus includes the Center for Health Sciences).
OREGON Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,490,159. 2a Decrease due to an unusually high figure for 2000-01. 4 Figure represents a title count, not a volume count. 5-7 Past figures were in error because of an undercount of print + electronic.
101
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
9 Excludes uncataloged documents. 19 Includes: Computer files and search services; document delivery, ILL, postage & freight; system maintenance; bibliographic utilities, networks, consortia. 26 Includes: other automated system hardware & software; all other supplies, services, and equipment. 37, 38 Interlibrary loan totals include Orbis consortium patron-initiated activity. 39 Past figures were in error because count included other doctoral degrees, not just PhDs.
PENNSYLVANIA 11 The revision of collections and a reassessment of space have resulted in a decrease in this figure from past surveys. 41-43 2000-01 figures revised to: (41) 2,252; (42) 17,718; (43) 4,135.
PENNSYLVANIA STATE Figures includes branch campuses in Abington-Ogontz, Allentown, Altoona, Beaver, Berks, Delaware, DuBois, Fayette, Hazleton, McKeesport, Mont Alto, New Kensington, Penn State Erie, Penn State Great Valley, Penn State Harrisburg, Schuylkill, Shenango Valley, Wilkes- Barre, Worthington-Scranton and York unless otherwise specified. Government documents are included by the main campus libraries, the Health Sciences library, and, for the first time, the Law library. 4 Figure for entire library system available for the first time. 14, 15 Reduction in Audio and Film and Video due to better counting methods and serious weeding of items. 34 Figure derived from sampling for Main campus, branch campuses and Law library only (extrapolation used: 41.2987); actual figure reported for Medical library.
PITTSBURGH Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 4,249,606, after the figure printed in 2000-01 was incorrectly reported by 49,973. Health Sciences libraries include the Falk Library of The Health Sciences, the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic Library, the Libraries at UPMC Shadyside and the Patient/Family Education Center of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. Figures also include the Barco Law Library, and branch campuses in Bradford, Greensburg, Johnstown, and Titusville. 2 Includes electronic books. 4 Aggregated figure for entire system unavailable. 7 Includes electronic serials. 11 Some archival collection relocated.
PRINCETON Includes Astrophysics, Biology, Chemistry, Engineering, GeoSciences, Math/Physics, Plasma Physics, Public and International Affairs & Population Research, East Asian Library, Psychology, Architecture, Art, Archives, and Music libraries. 8 Adjustment made in reported microforms previously listed in computer files.
PURDUE Excludes branch campuses in Westville (Purdue-North Central), Hammond (Purdue- Calumet), and Fort Wayne (Purdue-Fort Wayne). 1-3 Includes cataloged government documents. 4 Excludes volumes purchased on sponsored research programs. 5-7 Excludes some numbered monographic series. 6 Includes cataloged depository, exchange, and gift serials. 18 Expenditures for these materials are included in monograph expenditures (16) and serial expenditures (17), and cannot be disaggregated. 26 Increase over 2000-01 relates to renovation expenditures.
QUEEN'S All figures are as of April 30, 2002. 1-15 Excludes government documents. 4, 7 Figures reflect purchased volumes received. 2000-01 figures were low as electronic serials were not included in the total. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $1,615,830; (17) $5,917,690; (18) $29,903; (19) $65,105; (20) $7,628,528; (21) $156,019; (22) $2,286,517; (23) $4,218,966; (24) $307,464; (25) $6,812,947; (26) $1,407,495; (27) $16,004,989. 17 Excludes microforms.
102
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
18 Includes Education library, audiovisual materials only. 19 Includes document delivery services. 28 Includes continuing and contract positions. 35, 36 Figures include reserve items, as they are not disaggregated from other circulations. 39-40 Figures are as of November 2001. 41 Figure is as of October 2001 and includes all ranks combined, including deans but excluding pre-clinical and clinical instructors. 42-46 Figures reflect enrollments as of November 1, 2001. 45 Excludes interns, residents, and fellows.
RICE Current University research and teaching needs are seen to require separate leadership for library and information technology units. This change has resulted in significant decreases in numbers of staff, salaries, and other operating expenditures reported from 2001-02 forward. 5, 6 Shifts in figures due to counting titles purchased through consortia with centrally funded budgets per Q & A as free. 6 Increase due to change explained in note to 5. 11 Manuscripts and archives reported in cubic feet. 18 Increase due to expenditure of endangered funds and improved tracking mechanisms. 19 Includes memberships ($161,130), ILL ($69,418), in-house binding supplies ($17,248), and bibliographic utilities ($143,822, including $10,856 deposit balance). 22-24 Includes salary expenditures for contract/project labor, but excludes those for IT personnel. 26, 27 Decrease due to exclusion of other expenditures for information technology operation. 28-30 Excludes IT personnel. 38, 39 Excludes fee-based, off-campus, information-delivery operation.
ROCHESTER 4 Decrease due to fewer monographs purchased in 2001-02. 9 Decrease due to purchase of bibliographic records for government documents not previously in the database.
RUTGERS Includes two Law libraries, services to a non-Rutgers medical school, and campuses in Camden, Newark, and New Brunswick. 1, 3 Includes newly cataloged government documents. 7 Includes e-journals. 12-15 Figures cannot be disaggregated. Total audiovisual is 134,253. 25, 31 Excludes staff hired for special projects and grants.
SASKATCHEWAN All figures are as of April 30, 2002 and include the Education, Engineering, Natural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine branch libraries. Figures exclude Theological College libraries on campus that are not part of the library system. 1-7 Includes government documents. 2a Large weeding projects in 2001-02 caused the number of volumes withdrawn to be unusually high. 4 Figure represents titles purchased. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $1,662,164; (17) $4,014,083; (18) U/A; (19) $130,852; (20) $5,807,099; (21) $103,840; (22) $2,621,976; (23) $3,139,998; (24) $373,499; (25) $6,135,473; (26) $1,082,662; (27) $13,129,074. 22 Computer programmers, technicians, and budget officers included in professional staff. 27 Includes funding from grants and special funds. 39, 41-45 Latest figures available are for 1999-2000.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION All figures are as of September 30, 2002 and include the Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum in New York City and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama. Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 1,471,131. As purchasing agent for library materials for the Smithsonian Institution, the Smithsonian Institution Libraries system (SIL) purchases monographs and serials for some libraries that are not under SIL administration. The non- SIL libraries are located in the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, and the Gustav Heye Center of the National Museum of the American Indian. Purchases for non-SIL
103
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
libraries are not counted in the SIL collections but are included in the expenditures for monographs and serials. 2a During 2001-02, SIL weeded two collections from libraries that were closed and the collections consolidated into limited space. 5 Represents the number of titles, not volumes. Includes purchases for SIL and non-SIL libraries. The cost of purchases for non-SIL libraries is included in (16) and (17). 10 The count of computer files is titles. 16 Includes expenditures for both print and non-print items; the amount spent on non-print items cannot be disaggregated from the total. 17 Includes expenditures for electronic resources, including mediated searching. 18 Includes ILL, document delivery, and reformatting contracts. The increase in other costs is a function of increased costs for ILL due to an increase in the number of items borrowed. 19 Includes OCLC expenditures. 25 Actual "on board" costs. Does not include any "lapsed salaries" due to vacancies. Lapsed salaries were reprogrammed for expenditures in other areas. 26 Includes contract staff travel, training, public programs, cataloging, general, preservation and automation supplies and equipment purchases, memberships, equipment maintenance, exhibits, and miscellaneous contracts. Does not include health and medical benefits and building maintenance. The increased costs are attributed to a large new exhibition 30 No students were hired due to budget cuts. 32 SIL does not have a formal bibliographic instruction program. Instruction is provided to patrons as needed.
SOUTH CAROLINA Includes Music, Business, Mathematics, and South Caroliniana libraries. Excludes Aiken, Beaufort, Spartanburg, Sumter, Union, Lancaster, or Salkehatchie branch campus libraries.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Includes the Law library, which is an administratively separate library located on Main Campus, and the Health Sciences Library System, which is an administratively separate system and located on a separate Health Sciences Campus (except for the Dental Library, which is located on the Main Campus). The basis of volume count is physical for Main Campus and Health Sciences Library System, and bibliographic for the Law library. 9 Count is for a static Main Campus collection. All other documents are represented in the catalogs. 12 Main Campus library reports U/A; Law library reports 56; Health Sciences Library System reports zero. 19 $1,083,788 reported for Main Campus includes some ILL costs, memberships and database costs; $34,675 reported for Health Sciences Library System includes databases from NLM; Law library figure is zero. 26 Increase due to computer replacements, bookkeeping changes for attributing expenses to library and major consulting projects. 34-36 Increases due to re-opening of main social sciences library, which had been closed for earthquake renovation. 39 Figure is the same as in 2000-01.
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS Includes the Southern Illinois University Medical Library, which had been excluded since 1991-92. 5 Figure includes government document serials.
STANFORD Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 7,563,524. Several other figures have been revised since 2000-01 to include better information on actual holdings. All figures include the Hopkins Marine Station branch campus. The Medical and Law library statistics cannot be disaggregated from the main statistics, as the Medical and Law collections are an integral part of main library. 1-3, 5-8 Includes government documents. 22-25 Expenditures for professional salaries and professional FTE totals reflect phenomenal growth in Highwire Press. 39 Based on 2000-01 figures.
SUNY-ALBANY Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,013,526. Figures include the Science library and the Governor Thomas E. Dewey Graduate Library of Public Affairs and Policy on the downtown campus.
104
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
4 Reflects title count. 5 Includes 15,651 electronic titles, of which an undetermined number are provided by outside agencies and are not purchased with library funds included in serial expenditures (17). 10 No longer includes ICPSR datasets. Subscription gives library access to entire ICPSR database. 19 Includes but is not limited to: ILL services ($60,175); memberships ($42,035); bibliographic utilities ($109,062). Decrease due in part to dropping of RLG membership. 22 Reclassification of some staff has resulted in inclusion here of some positions counted as support staff prior to 2000-01. 26 $703,769 of the total represents expenditures from private giving to the libraries. 34 Some departments use sampling, others count.
SUNY-BUFFALO 12-15 Figures are estimated. 18 Dramatic change from 1999-2000 figure is due to inclusion of some electronic titles in the 1999-2000 figure. These titles are now reported in (17). 19 Includes costs for Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis and several other online services. 32-34 Figures based on sampling. 44, 45 Includes professional school enrollment.
SUNY-STONY BROOK 19 Includes bibliographic utilities, memberships, and some automation. 27 Includes income funds ($102,259), capital funds ($105,134), and grants ($148,669). 35 The Main library does not disaggregate initial circulations and renewals. Medical library reports 10,975.
SYRACUSE Includes Law library, which includes fringe benefits in expenditures for the first time. 4 Volumes prepaid are not included. Only number of titles purchased can be reported. 6 Number of current serials for Law library is unavailable. 9 4,163 of this number reflects previously held material that was not counted in 2000-01. 10 Increase due to addition of e-journal packages. 11 The Syracuse University Archives are not part of the University Library system, therefore their holdings were excluded from this figure. 13 The slide collection's slide/tape sets are both graphic and audio, but were counted as graphic. 18 Purchases of serial backfiles, charts and maps, and audiovisual materials are included in (16) and cannot be disaggregated. 34 University Library figures based on sampling, Law library on actual count. 36 At present, Voyager provides no count of online renewals and most are presently done online. This renewal figure includes only in-person renewals. Includes circulation of books via ILL. 39 Excludes JDs awarded by the Law School.
TEMPLE Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,679,899 to include the Blitman Resource Center collection and another portion of the government documents collection, which were retro- cataloged. Figures include Paley Library, the Engineering and Architecture Library, Biology Library, Chemistry Library, Mathematical Sciences Library, Physics Library, Blitman Resource Center, Zahn Library, the Charles L. Blockson Afro-American Collection, the Law library, the Tyler School of Art campus, the Ambler branch campus, the Harrisburg branch campus, and the Health Sciences Center Libraries. 9 Another portion of the government documents collection was retro-cataloged and reported in the revised figure for volumes held June 30, 2001. 41 Does not include 519 non-tenure-track full-time faculty.
TENNESSEE Figures include the Law Library and Social Work Branch in Nashville, the Preston Medical Center Library, the UT Space Institute in Tullahoma, TN, and the University of Tennessee at Memphis.
TEXAS All figures are as of August 31, 2002 and include the General Libraries, the Center for American History, the Tarlton Law Library, and the Humanities Research Center.
105
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
1-3 Includes 2,478 netLibrary titles purchased in 2001-02. Additional netLibrary titles available through consortial arrangements. 4 Includes 56,045 monographs purchased by the General Libraries, 2,314 by the Center for American History, 2,475 by the Tarlton Law Library, and 790 by the Humanities Research Center. 5 Includes 17,262 serials purchased by the General Libraries (14,377 print and 2,885 electronic), 108 by the Center for American History, 5,329 by the Tarlton Law Library, and 216 by the Humanities Research Center. 6 Includes 23,858 serials received by the General Libraries (18,290 print and 5,568 electronic), 177 by the Center for American History, 2,998 by the Tarlton Law Library, and 66 by the Humanities Research Center. 16 Includes expenditures of $3,301,483 by the General Libraries, $5,855 by the Center for American History, $128,756 by the Tarlton Law Library, and $109,999 by the Humanities Research Center. 17 Includes expenditures of $5,929,961 by the General Libraries, $5,073 by the Center for American History, $962,036 by the Tarlton Law Library, and $10,809 by the Humanities Research Center. 18 Includes expenditures of $1,450,856 by the General Libraries, $54,996 by the Center for American History, $227,150 by the Tarlton Law Library, and $535,583 by the Humanities Research Center. 19 Includes expenditures of $604 by the General Libraries and $225 by the Center for American History. 20 Includes expenditures of $10,682,904 by the General Libraries, $65,924 by the Center for American History, $1,317,942 by the Tarlton Law Library, and $656,391 by the Humanities Research center. 24 Includes federal work-study funds. 31 Includes 5 FTE staff hired on grant funds. 33 Includes 22,012 users of online tutorial. 39 Includes EdD degrees.
TEXAS A&M All figures are as of August 31, 2002 and include the Business and Agricultural Library (WCL), the Medical Science Library, the Technical Reference Center (TRS) for Architecture, and the Galveston campus. 6 Figure is estimated. 9 Figures unavailable for branch libraries. 11 Increase is a result of a careful inventory of materials and the recent acquisition of several large collections. 28 Includes librarians, other faculty, several categories of non-librarian professionals, and graduate assistants. 40 Two new PhD programs have been added.
TEXAS TECH Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,238,607 to include materials from the Geosciences Library. Figures include: Architecture library, Vietnam Center Library, Museum library, Geosciences library, International Cultural Center Library, the Southwest Collections/Special Collections Library, and the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center libraries at Amarillo, Odessa, and El Paso. 1 Used formula of "10 traditional volumes per foot" to calculate government documents at the University library. 19 Includes AMIGOS ($26,588), Cybertools ($30,175), Microdex ($69,065) reference update ($7,731), computer equipment ($37,616), computer software ($3,660), and furniture ($10,007), interlibrary loan ($74,230).
TORONTO All figures are as of April 30, 2002 and include all University of Toronto libraries (Main libraries, Architecture, Astronomy, Business, Chemistry, Criminology, Dentistry, Earth Sciences, Engineering & Computer Science, Fine Art, Industrial Relations, Innis College, Law, Music, New College, Trinity College, University College, Victoria College and Zoology), and branch campuses at Mississauga and Scarborough. The Federated Libraries budgets are under the authority of the University President and the libraries are located on the UT campus. Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 9,300,114 due to recount of materials. 1-4 Includes monographic series and government documents. 5-7 Serial subscriptions include licensed electronic journals. 13 Includes 60,000 slides of visual collection, plus a major acquisition of sheets of music and
106
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
special collection. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $8,685,853; (17) $11,973,686; (18) $3,382,208; (19) $0; (20) $24,041,747; (21) $528,041; (22) $13,120,641; (23) $14,581,845; (24) $3,779,656; (25) $31,482,142; (26) $7,902,673; (27) $63,954,603. 19 Included in monograph expenditures (16) and serials expenditures (17). 22-25 Exclude fringe benefits. 26 Excludes restricted funds. 28-31 Figures include recovered positions: 1.95 professional staff; 2.0 support staff. 34-36 Figures reported for total library system. Number of reference and circulation transactions decreased due to the relocations of Audio Visual Library, Microtext, and the renovation/construction of Gerstein Science Information Centre, Pharmacy Library, and the U of T-Scarborough Library.
TULANE Includes Architecture, Business, and Women's Center libraries, and the Medical branch campus library. 2a Business Library had a large withdrawal project in 2000-01. 11-13 Includes adjusted figures for these materials. 18 Main library included a large one-time electronic backfile purchase in 2000-01. 32-33 Medical Library figures were in error in 2000-01. 41 Campus reported source changed, resulting in a different number than previous years.
UTAH Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,909,555 due to Law library adjustments. 4 Figure for entire library system unavailable. Medical library reports 1,112. 18 Figure for Medical library only. 23 Includes 1.25 FTE paid by Utah Academic Library Consortium. 33 1936 Nazi Olympics Exhibition added 19,918 participants.
VANDERBILT Includes Biomedical, Central, Science and Engineering, Divinity, Education, Management, Music, Law, and Special Collections libraries, as well as the University Archives. 6 Includes electronic journals supplied free with print. 13 Increase due to first inventory of portions of photograph and slide collection. 15 Increase due to first inventory of portions of film and video collection. 18 These expenditures are included in (16) and (17). 19 Medical library database license expenditures. 21 Increase due to change in binding policy. 42-45 2000-01 numbers revised to: (42) 10,194; (43) 444; (44) 3,780; (45) 377.
VIRGINIA Figures include the Alderman (main library), Astronomy, Biology/Psychology, Chemistry, Clemons (undergraduate library), Darden Graduate Business, Education, Fiske Kimball Fine Arts, Ivy Stacks, Mathematics, Music, Physics, Science and Engineering libraries. Figures exclude the University of Virginia College at Wise. 1 Includes 7,203 Law documents converted to online catalog, and 107 Alderman documents converted to online catalog in 2001-02. These figures were not footnoted in 2000-01. 5-7 Includes government document serials. Includes monographic series in the Health Sciences and Law libraries. 8 Includes government documents in microformats. 9 Includes all US, International, and Virginia state documents in separate documents collections. Excludes those documents represented by OPAC records. 22-25 Includes fringe benefits. 24 Does not include federal work-study funds.
VIRGINIA TECH 5 Includes: 4,285 electronic serials; 143 electronic citation databases; 43 full text electronic databases; 43 electronic databases. 9 Effective February 1996, there is no retention in SuDocs; all documents cataloged. 19 Includes bibliographic utilities, literature searching, membership dues, interlibrary loan, postage and handling, and VPI dissertation filming. 37 includes 15,896 items to external users.
107
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
WASHINGTON Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 6,161,641 to reflect a correction in the Law and Medical library counts. Figures include the Law and Medical libraries, except where noted. Medical library includes Social Work library, Harborview Medical Center, and National Network/Libraries of Medicine (Regional Medical library). Figures exclude Bothell and Tacoma campuses. 2, 2a Increase due to the addition of 19,450 previously unreported e-books held by the Main Library. 4-6, 11, 18, 34, Figures are unavailable for the Law library. 39-45 5 Previously reported figures erroneously included an 8,000 volume duplication. 6, 18, 35, 39-45 Figures are unavailable for the Medical library. 19 Figures are unavailable for the Main library only. 22 The professional staff number for the Law library includes all librarians (including Head Law librarian) and professional staff. 28 Includes 1.0 FTE Law librarian (faculty status), 2.85 FTE part time and 1.0 FTE professional staff. 34 Figures are available for Medical library only. 35 Aggregate figures unavailable. Law library reports 20,385. 39-45 Figures from UW main campus only.
WASHINGTON STATE Figures include Holland Library, Owen Science and Engineering Library, Brain Education Library, Architecture library, Fischer Agricultural Sciences Library, Veterinary Medical/Pharmacy library, branch campuses in Vancouver, Tri-Cities, Spokane (CALS), the Intercollegiate College of Nursing, and the Energy library. 16-27 Includes expenditures for CD-ROMs, microforms, manuscripts and archives, and special collection items. 18 Includes Media Materials Services films, videos, and compact discs.
WASHINGTON, St. LOUIS 5, 6 Separate figures unavailable for Law library. 15 Includes films and videos received with the Henry Hampton Archives, a new collection acquired in 2001-02. 18 Figures not available for central library system. 22-25, 31 Includes telecommunications staff in Medical library. Staff are paid from Library budget and report to the Director. 26 Includes expenditures for building/utilities charged to the library's budget. 32, 33 Figures not available for Business library. 34 Based on sampling for central library only. Figures unavailable for Law and Business libraries. 35, 36 Figures unavailable for Business library.
WATERLOO All figures are as of April 30, 2002. 2a Unusually high figure for 2001-02 related to redesign of local statistical system. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $1,202,584; (17) $4,435,738; (18) $132,265; (19) $245,823; (20) $6,016,410; (21) $90,121; (22) $2,474,143; (23) $3,344,982; (24) $606,266; (25) $6,425,391; (26) $1,174,814; (27) $13,706,736. 17 Figure includes expenditures on print and e-resources. In 1999-2000, the e-resources component was included in the response to (18), and in previous years in (19). 18 One-time e-backfile purchase.
WAYNE STATE All figures are as of September 30, 2002 and include Reuther Archives of Labor and Urban Affairs. Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 3,257,798 to correct an error in the data accumulation process for volumes added and volumes withdrawn for periods prior to 2001- 02. The Medical and Law library statistics cannot be disaggregated from the main statistics because the Medical and Law collections are an integral part of the main library. 1-7 Includes government documents. 5-7 The serials count is taken from the online system. The system does not currently count whether a serial was purchased or not purchased. 11, 13, 34 Figures are estimated.
108
INSTITUTION QUESTION NOTE NUMBER
17, 19 Expenditures for certain electronic resources classified as miscellaneous library materials (19) in previous years are properly classified as current serials expenditures (17) beginning in 2000-01. The total of that reclassification was $842,808 for 2000-01 and $1,527,284 for 2001-02. 18 Total cannot be disaggregated from monograph expenditures (16) and serial expenditures (17). 39 Includes Ed. D. degrees.
WESTERN ONTARIO All figures are as of April 30, 2002 and include the main campus libraries: Business Library, Education Library, Law Library, Music Library, Allyn & Betty Taylor Library (Medicine, Dentistry, Sciences, Applied Health Sciences, Nursing, and Engineering Science), The D.B. Weldon Library (Arts, Social Sciences, and Information and Media Studies) and the Archives and Research Collections. Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 2,795,706; This is the new base count from the III system, which does not include 447,449 scores and parts in the Music Library. 1-4, 16 Includes 85 e-books. 14 Includes photographic negative collection of 300,000 envelopes. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $1,470,826; (17) $7,149,591; (18) U/A; (19) $957,389; (20) $9,577,806; (21) $178,045; (22) $3,017,067; (23) $3,459,803; (24) $535,075; (25) $7,011,945; (26) $489,716; (27) $17,257,512. 17 Includes Can$1,691,092 for electronic serial titles not included in (5). 44 Includes 454 interns and residents (not included in reports of previous years).
WISCONSIN Volumes held June 30, 2001 revised to 6,135,234. Figures include the libraries of the General Library System (Memorial, College-Undergraduate, Music, Art, Business, Social Science, Geography, Social Work, Biology, Chemistry, Geology and Geophysics, Mathem 1 Includes maps not included among cartographic materials (12). 2 2000-01 figure revised to 92,965. 2a 2000-01 figure revised to 14,932. 3 2000-01 figure revised to 78,033. 4 2000-01 figure revised to 59,756. 5-9 Some government document serials that are assigned Library of Congress numbers are included in current serials. 5, 7 2000-01 figures revised to: (5) 36,479; (7) 43,799. These corrections should replace those mentioned in the Footnotes to the ARL Statistics 2000-01. 6 2000-01 figure revised to 7,320. 18 Internal accounting change resulted in expenditures previously reported as "other" now reported with serials (17). 19 Postage capitalized for collection. 37 2000-01 figure revised to 109,946.
YALE 5 Includes approximately 5,300 electronic serials titles acquired as part of some aggregated packages, as well as e-journals purchased directly. 6 Includes approximately 2,000 free or free-with-print e-journals. 32, 33 2000-01 figures revised to 931 and 8,491, respectively, to include general instruction program statistics.
YORK All figures are as of April 30, 2002 and include the Glendon campus. 13 Additional holdings: 1,151 linear feet. 16-27 Expenditures as reported in Canadian dollars: (16) $2,038,092; (17) $5,425,131; (18) $331,904; (19) $28,097; (20) $7,823,224; (21) $188,033; (22) $4,342,041; (23) $4,217,985; (24) $734,281; (25) $9,294,307; (26) $1,448,288; (27) $18,753,852.
109
APPENDIX A
ARL MEMBER LIBRARIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2003
The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) represents the interests of 123 libraries that serve major North American research institutions. ARL operates as a forum for the exchange of ideas and as an agent for collective action to influence the forces affecting the ability of these libraries to meet the future needs of scholarship. The ARL Statistics and Measurement program is organized around identifying, collecting, analyzing, and distributing quantifiable information describing the characteristics of research libraries. The program offers publications and special member services, and collaborates with other national and international library statistics programs.
The members of the Association are:
Institution Category Full Name of Institution Location
Alabama S University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, Alabama Alberta C University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Arizona S University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Arizona State S Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona Auburn S Auburn University Auburn, Alabama Boston P Boston University Boston, Massachusetts Boston College P Boston College Boston, Massachusetts Brigham Young P Brigham Young University Provo, Utah British Columbia C University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia Brown P Brown University Providence, Rhode Island Berkeley, California S University of California, Berkeley California, Berkeley California, Davis S University of California, Davis Davis, California California, Irvine S University of California, Irvine Irvine, California California, Los Angeles S University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, California California, Riverside S University of California, Riverside Riverside, California California, San Diego S University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California California, Santa Barbara S University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, California Case Western Reserve P Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio Chicago P University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois Cincinnati S University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio Colorado S University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado Colorado State S Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Columbia P Columbia University New York, New York Connecticut S University of Connecticut Storrs, Connecticut Cornell P Cornell University Ithaca, New York Dartmouth P Dartmouth College Hanover, New Hampshire Delaware S University of Delaware Newark, Delaware Duke P Duke University Durham, North Carolina Emory P Emory University Atlanta, Georgia Florida S University of Florida Gainesville, Florida Flordia State S Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida George Washington P George Washington University Washington, D.C. Georgetown P Georgetown University Washington, D.C. Georgia S University of Georgia Athens, Georgia Georgia Tech S Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia Guelph C University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario Harvard P Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts Hawaii S University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii Houston S University of Houston Houston, Texas Howard P Howard University Washington, D.C. Illinois, Chicago S University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, Illinois Illinois, Urbana S University of Illinois at Urbana Urbana, Illinois Indiana S Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana Iowa S University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa Iowa State S Iowa State University Ames, Iowa Johns Hopkins P Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland Kansas S University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas Kent State S Kent State University Kent, Ohio Kentucky S University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky Laval C Laval University Quebec, Quebec Louisiana State S Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana Louisville S University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky McGill C McGill University Montreal, Quebec McMaster C McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario Manitoba C University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba Maryland S University of Maryland College Park, Maryland
S – U.S. public university; P – U.S. private university; C – Canadian university; N – U.S. nonuniversity; X – Canadian nonuniversity
110
Institution Category Full Name of Institution Location
Massachusetts S University of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts MIT P Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts Miami P University of Miami Coral Gables, Florida Michigan S University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan Michigan State S Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan Minnesota S University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota Missouri S University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri Montreal C University of Montreal Montreal, Quebec Nebraska S University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, Nebraska New Mexico S University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico New York P New York University New York, New York North Carolina S University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina North Carolina State S North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina Northwestern P Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois Notre Dame P University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana Ohio S Ohio University Athens, Ohio Ohio State S Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio Oklahoma S University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma Oklahoma State S Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma Oregon S University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon Pennsylvania P University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Pennsylvania State S Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania Pittsburgh S University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Princeton P Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey Purdue S Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana Queen’s C Queen's University Kingston, Ontario Rice P Rice University Houston, Texas Rochester P University of Rochester Rochester, New York Rutgers S Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Jersey Saskatchewan C University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan South Carolina S University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina Southern California P University of Southern California Los Angeles, California Southern Illinois S Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois Stanford P Stanford University Stanford, California SUNY-Albany S University at Albany, State University of New York Albany, New York SUNY-Buffalo S University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo, New York SUNY-Stony Brook S State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York Syracuse P Syracuse University Syracuse, New York Temple S Temple University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Tennessee S University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee Texas S University of Texas Austin, Texas Texas A&M S Texas A&M University College Station, Texas Texas Tech S Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas Toronto C University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario Tulane P Tulane University New Orleans, Louisiana Utah S University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah Vanderbilt P Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee Virginia S University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia Virginia Tech S Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Blacksburg, Virginia Washington S University of Washington Seattle, Washington Washington State S Washington State University Pullman, Washington Washington U.-St. Louis P Washington University St. Louis, Missouri Waterloo C University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario Wayne State S Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan Western Ontario C University of Western Ontario London, Ontario Wisconsin S University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin Yale P Yale University New Haven, Connecticut York C York University North York, Ontario
Boston Public Library N Boston Public Library Boston, Massachusetts Canada Inst. SciTech Info. X Canada Inst. for Scientific & Technical Information Ottawa, Ontario Center for Research Libs. N Center for Research Libraries Chicago, Illinois Library of Congress N Library of Congress Washington, D.C. Natl. Agricultural Lib. N National Agricultural Library Beltsville, Maryland Natl. Library of Canada X National Library of Canada Ottawa, Ontario Natl. Library of Medicine N National Library of Medicine Bethesda, Maryland New York Public Library N New York Public Library New York, New York New York State Library N New York State Library Albany, New York Smithsonian Institution N Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C.
S – U.S. public university; P – U.S. private university; C – Canadian university; N – U.S. nonuniversity; X – Canadian nonuniversity
111
APPENDIX B
BIBLIOGRAPHY
PART A: Selected Articles from the ARL Newsletter
“ARL Awarded FIPSE Grant for Assessment of Library Service Quality.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 212 (October 2000): 7.
“The ARL Membership Criteria Index.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 197 (April 1998): 9.
Askew Waller, Consuella, and Kaylyn Hipps. “Using LibQUAL+ and Developing a Culture of Assessment in Libraries.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 221 (April 2002): 10-11.
Barrett, G. Jaia. “The Cost of Interlibrary Loan.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 166 (January 1993): 1-2.
Blixrud, Julia. "Establishing a Role for Research Libraries in Learning Outcomes Assessment Programs." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 213 (December 2000): 1.
______. “Back-Room and Front-Line Changes.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 208/209 (February/April 2000): 14.
______. "Custom Reports Meet Member Needs." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 208/209 (February/April 2000): 17.
______. "The Continuing Quest for New Measures." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 207 (December 1999): 11.
______. "Preservation Expenditures Level; Microfilming, Staffing Decline." ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 201 (December 1998): 14.
______. "University Funding for Research Libraries." ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 199 (August 1998): 6.
Bilxrud, Julia, and Timothy D. Jewell. "Understanding Electronic Resources and Library Materials Expenditures: An Incomplete Picture." ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 197 (April 1998): 12-13.
Case, Mary M, and Judith Matz. “Framing the Issue: Open Access” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 226 (February 2003): 8-10.
Case, Mary M. “The Impact of Serial Costs on Library Collections.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 218 (October 2001): 9.
Case, Mary M. and Prudence Adler. “Promoting Open Access.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 220 (February 2002): 1-5.
Cook, Colleen. “SERVQUAL and the Quest for New Measures.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 207 (December 1999): 12-13.
Cook, Colleen and Fred Heath. “The ARL 'LibQUAL' Pilot Project: An Update.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 211 (August 2000): 12-14.
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, and Bruce Thompson. “A Brief LibQUAL+ Phase One Progress Report.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 219 (December 2001): 7.
______. “LibQUAL+: One Instrument in the New Measures Toolbox.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 212 (October 2000): 4-7.
112
ʺCollections & Access for the 21st-Century Scholar: Changing Roles of Research Libraries.ʺ A Report from the ARL Collections & Access Issues Task Force. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 225 (December 2002).
“The Cornell Journal Price Study.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 205 (August 1999): 6.
“The Crisis in Libraries’ Collection Coverage of Global Publishing: An Update.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 206 (October 1999): 8-11.
Crowe, William J. "The End of History? Reflections on a Decade" ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 226 (February 2003): 12-13.
Daval, Nicola. “Rising Prices Continue to Plague ARL Libraries.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 174 (May 1994): 1-2.
Deiss, Kathryn. “Changing Roles in Research Libraries.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 208/209 (February/April 2000): 15.
Grosetta Nardini, Holly. “Building a Culture of Assessment.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 218 (October 2001): 11.
Guedon, Jean-Claude. “Beyond Core Journals and Licenses: The Paths to Reform Scientific Publishing.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 218 (October 2001): 1-8.
Hamaker, Charles. “Journal Prices in Perspective.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 153 (November 1990): 1-2.
Hipps, Kaylyn. “The Academic & Research Library Job Market as Seen Through the ARL Career Resources Online Service.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 208/209 (February/April 2000): 21.
Jackson, Mary E. “Research Library Interlibrary Lending: An Isolated Drop or the Beginning of a Trend?.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 211 (August 2000): 6-8.
______. “Measuring the Performance of Interlibrary Loan and Document Delivery Services.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 195 (December 1997): 1-3.
Johnson, Richard K. “Whither Competition?” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 217 (August 2001): 12-14.
Kyrillidou, Martha. “Salary Trends Highlight Inequities--Old and New.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 208/209 (February/April 2000): 6-12.
______. “Educational Credentials, Professionalism, and Librarians.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 208/209 (February/April 2000): 12-13.
______. “Journal Costs: Current Trends and Future Scenarios for 2020.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 210 (June 2000): 10-11.
______. “Research Library Spending on Electronic Scholarly Information is on the Rise.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 213 (December 2000): 9.
______. “Round-Up of Other E-Metrics Developments.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 213 (December 2000): 8.
______. "An Overview of Performance Measures in Higher Education and Libraries." ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 197 (April 1998): 3-8.
______. “Trends in Preservation Activities.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 194 (October 1997): 10.
______. “Trends in Research Library Acquisitions and ILL Services.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 180 (May 1995): 3-4.
______. “NCES Describes U.S. Higher Education.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 179 (March 1995): 10-11.
113
Kyrillidou, Martha, and Kaylyn Hipps. “Symposium on Measuring Library Service Quality.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 215 (April 2001): 9-11.
Kyrillidou, Martha, and Kendon Stubbs. “Supply and Demand in ARL Libraries.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 175 (July 1994): 4-5.
Kyrillidou, Martha, and Michael O'Connor. “ARL Librarian Salaries Rise Faster than Inflation.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 208/209 (February/April 2000): 16.
Kyrillidou, Martha, and William Crowe. "In Search of New Measures." ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research and Library Issues and Actions 197 (April 1998): 8-10.
Lakos, Amos. “Highlights of the Third Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 207 (December 1999): 13-15.
Lippincott, Joan. “Assessing the Academic Networked Environment.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 197 (April 1998): 14-16.
Lynch, Clifford A. ʺInstitutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Ageʺ ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 226 (February 2003): 1-7.
McCabe, Mark J. “The Impact of Publisher Mergers on Journal Prices: An Update.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 207 (December 1999): 1-5.
“Measuring the Cost Effectiveness of Journals: The Wisconsin Experience.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 205 (August 1999): 1-6.
Nitecki, Danuta. “SERVQUAL: Measuring Service Quality in Academic Libraries.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 191 (April 1997): 14.
Pritchard, Sarah M. “ARL Statistics Show Shift from Ownership to Access.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 161 (March 1992): 3.
______. “New Directions for ARL Statistics.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 161 (March 1992): 1-2, 4.
Reed-Scott, Jutta. “Trends in Preservation Activities.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 187 (August 1996): 5.
Sewell, Robert G. "'Big Heads' Library Materials Budget Survey Now on ARL Website." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 211 (August 2000): 5-8.
Shim, Wonsik "Jeff", and Charles McClure. "Measuring Services, Resources, Users, and Use in the Networked Environment." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 210 (June 2000): 9-10.
Shim, Wonsik "Jeff", Charles McClure, and John Carlo Bertot. “Measures and Statistics for Research Library Networked Services: ARL E-Metrics Phase II Report.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 219 (December 2001): 8-9.
______. "Data Gathering Practices in the Networked Environment." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 213 (December 2000): 6-8.
Smith, Kenneth R. "New Roles and Responsibilities for the University Library: Advancing Student Learning Through Outcomes Assessment." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 213 (December 2000): 2-5.
Stubbs, Kendon. "Interactive Peer Group Comparisons through the Web." ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 197 (April 1998): 11.
______. “Service Trends Charted in Newly Released ARL Statistics.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 185 (April 1996): 14.
______. “Trends in University Funding for Research Libraries.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 172 (January 1994): 1-3.
114
Stubbs, Kendon, and Nicola Daval. “ARL Statistics Reflect Impact of Rising Prices.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 167 (March 1993): 6-7.
Stuber, Peter. “Where does the Free Online Scholarship Movement Stand Today?” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 220 (February 2002): 9-15.
Thomes, Kate. "The Economics and Usage of Digital Library Collections." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 210 (June 2000): 5-7.
Wetzel, Karen A., and Mary Jackson. “Portal Functionability Provided by ARL Libraries: Results of an ARL Survey.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 222 (June 2002): 7-9.
Wilder, Stanley. “New Hires in Research Libraries: Demographic Trends and Hiring Priorities.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 221 (April 2002): 5-8.
______. “The Changing Profile of Research Library Professional Staff.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 208/209 (February/April 2000): 1-5.
______. “The Age Demographics of Academic Librarians.” ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions 185 (April 1996): 1-3.
Winkworth, Ian. “Performance Measurement of U.K. University Libraries.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 207 (December 1999): 16-17.
Young, Mark. “ARL Salary Survey Highlights.” ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 221 (April 2002): 14.
PART B: Related Books and Articles Published in Other Sources
Arms, William Y. “Quality Control in Scholarly Publishing on the Web.” The Journal of Electronic Publishing 8, no. 1 (August 2002).
Baumol, W. J., and M. Marcus. Economics of Academic Libraries. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Education, 1973.
Bertot, John Carlo, Charles McClure, and Joe Ryan. Statistics and Performance Measures for Public Library Networked Services. Chicago: American Library Association, 2001.
Blixrud, Julia. “The Association of Research Libraries Statistics and Measurement Program: From Descriptive Data to Performance Measures.” Proceedings from the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, edited by Joan Stein, Martha Kyrillidou, and Denise Davis. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Clapp, V. W. The Future of the Research Library. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964.
Coffman, Steve. “Building Earth’s Largest Library: Driving into the Future.” Searcher 7, no. 3 (March 1999).
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, Bruce Thompson, and Duane Webster. “LibQUAL+™: Preliminary Results from 2002.” Performance Measurement and Metrics 4, no. 1 (2003): 38-47.
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, Martha Kyrillidou, and Duane Webster. “The Forging of Consensus: A Methodological Approach to Service Quality Assessment in Research Libraries – the LibQUAL+ Experience.” Proceedings from the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, edited by Joan Stein, Martha Kyrillidou, and Denise Davis. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, and Russell Thompson. “Reliability and structure of LibQUAL+ scores.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 2 (2002): 3-12.
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, and Bruce Thompson. “Score norms for improving library service quality: A LibQUAL+ study.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 2 (2002): 13-26.
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, Bruce Thompson, and Russell Thompson. The Search for New Measures: The ARL LibQUAL+Project--A Preliminary Report. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001. Accessed on the Internet at
______. "LibQUAL+: Service Quality Assessment in Research Libraries." IFLA Journal 27 (2001): 264-8.
115
Council on Library and Information Resources. A Different Approach to the Evaluation of Research Libraries. Research Brief 6. Washington, D.C.: The Council, 1998.
Crow, Raym. “The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper.” Washington: Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition, 2002.
Cummings, Anthony M., et al. University Libraries and Scholarly Communication: A Study Prepared for The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1992.
Cummings, M. M. The Economics of Research Libraries. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library Resources, 1986.
Downs, Robert B. “The Growth of Research Collections.” Library Trends: American Library History: 1876-1976 25 (July 1976): 55-80.
______. “Uniform Statistics for Library Holdings.” Library Quarterly 16 (January 1946): 63-69.
Drake, Miriam A. “Forecasting Academic Library Growth.” College and Research Libraries 37 (January 1976): 53-59.
Hayes, Robert M. Strategic Management for Academic Libraries: A Handbook. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1993.
Heath, Fred, Colleen Cook, Martha Kyrillidou, and Bruce Thompson. “ARL Index and other validity correlates of LibQUAL+ scores.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 2 (2002): 27-42.
Hernon, Peter, and Robert E. Dugan. Action Plan for Outcomes Assessment in Your Library. Chicago: American Library Association, 2002.
Hernon, Peter, and John R. Whitman. Delivering Satisfaction and Service Quality. Chicago: American Library Association , 2001.
Hernon, Peter, and Ellen Altman. Assessing Service Quality. Chicago: American Library Association, 1998.
Hightower, Christy, Julie Sih, and Adam Tilgham. “Recommendations for Benchmarking Web Site Usage Among Academic Libraries.” College and Research Libraries 59 (January 1998): 61-79.
Jackson, Mary E. Measuring the Performance of Interlibrary Loan Operations in North American Research & College Libraries. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research of Libraries, 1998.
Johnson, Richard K. “A Question of Access: SPARC, BioOne, and Society-Driven Electronic Publishing.” D-Lib Magazine (May 2000), accessed on the Internet at
Kling, Rob, Lisa Spector, and Geoff McKim. “The Guild Model.” The Journal of Electronic Publishing 8, no. 1 (August 2002).
Kuhlman, A. F. “Two ARL Approaches to Counting Holdings of Research Libraries.” College and Research Libraries 21 (May 1960): 207-11.
Kyrillidou, Martha. “From Input and Output Measures to Quality and Outcome Measures, or, from the User in the Life of the Library to the Library in the Life of the User.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 28, no. 1 (January-March 2002): 42-46.
______. "To Describe and Measure the Performance of North American Research Libraries." IFLA Journal 27 (2001, No. 4): 257-63.
______. "Research Library Trends: ARL Statistics." Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2001. Accessed on the Internet at
______. “New Collections, New Marketplace Relations.” Resource Sharing and Information Networks 14, no. 1 (Fall 1998).
______. Developing Indicators for Academic Library Performance: Ratios from the ARL Statistics 1994-95 and 1995-96. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1997.
Kyrillidou, Martha, and Fred Heath, eds. "Measuring Service Quality." Library Trends 49 (Spring 2001).
Lakos, Amos. “Culture of Assessment as a Catalyst for Organizational Culture Change in Libraries.” Proceedings from the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, edited by Joan Stein, Martha Kyrillidou, and Denise Davis. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Matthews, William. “More sites targeted for shutdown.” Federal Computer Week (November 13, 2002).
116
Mekkawi, Mod. “The ARL Library Index as a Decision-Making Tool.” College and Research Libraries 43 (September 1982): 396-401.
Miller, Rush, and Sherrie Schmidt. “E-Metrics: Measures for Electronic Resources.” Proceedings from the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, edited by Joan Stein, Martha Kyrillidou, and Denise Davis. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Miller, Rush, Sherrie Schmidt, and Martha Kyrillidou. “New Initiatives in Performance Measures.” Global Issues in 21st Century Research Librarianship, edited by Sigrun Klara Hannesdottir. Helsinki: NORDINFO, 2002.
Molyneux, Robert E. “What Did Rider Do? An Inquiry into the Methodology of Fremont Rider’s The Scholar and the Future of the Research Library.” Libraries and Culture 29 (Summer 1994): 297-325.
______. “Patterns, Processes of Growth, and the Projection of Library Size: A Critical Review of the Literature on Academic Library Growth.” Library and Information Science Research 8 (January-March 1986): 5-28.
______. The Gerould Statistics 1907/08-1961/62. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1986.
Molyneux, Robert E., and Robert V. Williams. “Measuring the Internet.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 34 (1999- 2000): 287-339.
Morris, Dilys E., Collin B. Hobert, Lori Osmus, and Gregory Wool. “Cataloging Staff Costs Revisited.” LRTS 44 (2000): 70-83.
Nitecki, Danuta, and Toni Olshen. “Developing Service Quality Measurement Skills Through and Online Course for Librarians.” Proceedings from the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, edited by Joan Stein, Martha Kyrillidou, and Denise Davis. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Piternick, George. “ARL Statistics—Handle With Care.” College and Research Libraries 38 (September 1977): 419-23.
______. “Library Growth and Academic Quality.” College and Research Libraries 24 (May 1963): 223-29.
Rider, Fremont. The Scholar and the Future of the Research Library. New York: Hadham Press, 1944.
Roche, Marilyn M. ARL/RLG Interlibrary Loan Cost Study. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1993.
Rosenblatt, Susan. “Developing Performance Measures for Library Collections and Services.” Chap. 18 in The Mirage of Continuity: Reconfiguring Academic Information Resources for the 21st Century, edited by Brian L. Hawkins and Patricia Battin. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources, 1998.
Shim, Wonsik, Charles McClure, and John Carlo Bertot. “Preliminary Statistics and Measures for ARL Libraries to Describe Electronic Resources and Services.” Proceedings from the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, edited by Joan Stein, Martha Kyrillidou, and Denise Davis. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Stubbs, Kendon. “University Libraries: Standards and Statistics.” College and Research Libraries 42 (November 1981): 527-38.
______. “Apples and Oranges and ARL Statistics.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 14 (September 1988): 231-35.
Wilder, Stanley J. The Age Demographics of Academic Librarians: A Profession Apart. A Report Based on Data from the ARL Annual Salary Survey. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1995.
Williams, Robert V. “The Making of Statistics of National Scope on American Libraries, 1836-1986: Purposes, Problems, and Issues.” Libraries and Culture 26 (Spring 1991): 464-85.
PART C: Publications from the Association of Research Libraries
ARL Academic Law and Medical Library Statistics 1992-93 to 1997-98. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1999.
Kyrillidou, Martha, and Mark Young. ARL Annual Salary Survey 2002-03. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2003.
Kyrillidou, Martha, and Mark Young. ARL Statistics 2000-01. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
LibQUAL+ Spring 2002 Survey Results Volume 1: Aggregate Survey Results. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
LibQUAL+ Spring 2002 Survey Results Volume 5: Association of Research Libraries Survey Results. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
117
Measures for Electronic Resources (E-Metrics) Complete Set. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Report of the ARL Serials Prices Project. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1989.
Research Libraries: Measurement, Management, Marketing: Minutes of the 108th Meeting, May 1-2, 1986, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1986.
Stein, Joan, Martha Kyrillidou, and Denise Davis, eds. Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, August 12-16, 2001. Washington, D.C: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Wressel, Pat, ed. Proceedings of the 1st Nortumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, August 31-September 4, 1995. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1998.
Wressel, Pat, and Associates, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, September 7-11, 1997. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1998.
Wressel, Pat, and Associates, eds. Proceedings of the 3rd Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, August 27-31, 1999. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2000.
Young, Mark, and Martha Kyrillidou. ARL Academic Health Sciences Library Statistics 1998-99 to 2000-01. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Young, Mark, and Martha Kyrillidou. ARL Academic Law Library Statistics 1998-99 to 2000-01. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
Young, Mark, Martha Kyrillidou, and Julia Blixrud. ARL Preservation Statistics 2000-01. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 2002.
118