The Maltese Dolmens

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Maltese Dolmens THE MALTESE DOLMENS Daniel Sciberras They cannot be dated from the pottery, Introduction since this has been disturbed. Zammit A dolmen can be defined as a massive reported that "no pottery, implements or worked block of stone which has bee~ similar objects have ever been found near made to lie suspended in space in the the menhirs or dolmens in these islands. horizontal position. It constitutes an Being usually raised on the bare rock, integral component of the megalithic everything around them must have been buildings which had their hey-day in the cleared centuries ago" (Zammit 1930: 7). New Stone Age, or Neolithic period (Mega =large, Neo =new, lithic= stone). The Maltese temples are also unique in that they represent the earliest The term is a traditional French term freestanding megalithic structures above formerly used to denote a megalithic the ground. Megalithic structures outside chamber tomb, and consists of vertically Malta and Gozo are, with a few exceptions inclined stones, called orthostats, like Stonehenge, associated with burial supporting a capstone. It is probably complexes. In Malta and Gozo these derived from the Cornish term tolmen megalithic temples cannot be similarly (tal = table, men = stone), which is ~ associated, especially in the sites of chamber formed by a capstone supported Tarxien, in Malta, and Xaghra in Gozo. on stones. In the Far East, a dolmen is a The Tarxien temples lie in close proximity megalithic stone burial feature dating to to the Hal Saflieni burial complex in the the first millennium BC, and usually Hypogeum area, and the Ggantija temples contained polished stone implements are practically surrounded by (Brown 1977: 6; Bahn 1992: 137). The underground burial structures such as the term is no longer used in association with Brochtorff Circle. The Hypogeum and the a megalithic chamber tomb, and is usually Brochtorff Circle are similar to the reserved for tombs of undetermined plan structures above ground in that they are or of a simple unspecialized form (Bray & megalithic in structure. The Hypogeum is Trump 1982: 78). unique since it has been carved in the living rock over a very long span of time, The dolmen is always supported on other and it was also decorated in red ochre. large stones. In large structures, such as the Maltese temples and Stonehenge, the Therefore, m Malta and Gozo, the supporting stones are also worked and are megalithic complexes above and below as massive as the dolmen. These upright ground are unique, and, besides the slabs are called menhirs (men = stone, hir menhirs, the dolmens are crucial elements = long) (Brown 1977: 6). When the stones in their structure. In the Maltese islands supporting the dolmen are comparatively the function of the dolmen comple~ small, the entire structure itself is also without supporting menhirs remains known as a dolmen. unknown. The smaller supporting stones enclose a space or chamber, such as can be Function seen in Plate 1. When they were first discovered in Malta as a group, by The uniqueness of the Maltese dolmens Professor Napoleon Tagliaferro, they were lies in the fact that, whereas these thought to possibly represent either altars structures are associated elsewhere with for public sElcrifices or monuments erected burial sites of the Bronze Age, no such over graves. The practice of erecting large burials have ever been found associated complexes of stones over, or around grave with the Maltese specimens. They cannot areas, is classically seen in the pyramids therefore be assigned as Bronze Age of Egypt, although in these instances the burial sites when their function appears final product is completely different in to have been different from that overseas. appearance. Facets of Maltese Prehistory Large slabs of stone have been utilized structures. The close association of universally to mark the site of a buried dolmenic assemblages with typical body. The Phoenicians and Punic people megalithic temple layouts, such as at dedicated their prayers on these slabs Bugibba, would rather date the former to which are known as stelae. To this day the Neolithic, and not the Bronze Age. burials are covered over by large slabs of stone such as marble. Large military The first group of dolmens to be cemeteries contain smaller slabs of stone discovered in the Maltese Islands was in bearing the name of the deceased. the field of "Ix-Xaghra ta' fuq wied Filep," between the village of Mosta and Fort The space inside a dolmen is too small to Mosta. Three dolmens lay close to one contain a straight corpse, although it may another, and the best preserved consisted accommodate it if it is flexed in the so­ of a hard coralline slab of stone measuring called foetal position. On the other hand, twelve feet in length, five feet in breadth if the body is cremated before burial, one and two feet in thickness. It was dolmen can accommodate several urns. supported by roughly hewn slabs of stones However no evidence of this sort has been and stood five feet above ground. found in the Maltese dolmens, and there is therefore no proof that they served the Shortly afterwards, Tagliaferro discovered function of ritual burial. another large dolmen in the district of Misrah Sinjura, between the villages of Historical records Qrendi and Siggiewi. The dolmen here The earliest reference to a dolmen-like measured thirteen by eleven feet, and was structure in the Maltese islands is the one two and a half feet thick on average. It described by Abela and Ciantar at lay four feet above ground. The dolmen Xewkija. "in that part of the island called had been adapted to another use through el Sceukia, near a church dedicated to St. the erection of a rubble wall. Zammit John ... one can see a huge enormous stone reported that no archaeological material whose sides exceed 15 feet, which rests on was discovered at either of these dolmenic four other stones - high enough from the sites discovered by Tagliaferro. ground to allow a man to stand under them" (Abela & Ciantar 1772-80: 341). Several other dolmens have since been This was interpreted as a residence for discovered in Malta and Gozo. In 1914, giants, and used as evidence for their another dolmen was discovered at Hal presence on the islands in prehistoric Far, where the "rocky ground is strewn times. with the remains of megalithic structures", which again associates it with the In the late eighteenth century, Leith N eolithic period. This dolmen, known as Adams described a dolmen-like structure "Il-Gebla Msaqqfa" was composed of hard on Corradino Hill, overlooking the Grand calcareous stone and was rectangular in Harbour. Dolmens in Malta and Gozo shape. It measured twelve by six feet, typically overlook panoramic views. and was two feet thick. Although similar "Overlooking the Grand Harbour of to the previous examples, this dolmen had Valletta there are remnants of small a quadrangular depression in its middle, chambers, mostly formed of erect blocks and this was surrounded by a deep groove not exceeding 3 to 3Vl feet in height. These on the side and several cup-like holes. being remarkably small as compared with From the shape of the underlying rock, it any of the above-mentioned blocks appears that the dolmen was cut off from [Ggantija and Hagar Qim], may represent the very same spot which it covered, and what has been named an uncovered was then raised to a height of two and a dolmen; they however contain no half feet by two courses of boulders. subterranean sepulchre, and are not surrounded by circles of stones, or any In 1915, a dolmen discovered at Zabbar vestige of the kind." (Leith Adams 1870: contained a circular central hole about 248). Once again, the absence of any sign three inches in diameter. These features of the function of ritual burial argues in the centre of the dolmen may suggest a against a sepulchral function of these function other than a ritual burial, but as 102 The Maltese Dolmens Close proximity of dolmen to the Neolithic temple at Bugibba Rounded capstone on smaller stones, Bugibba temple The pair of dolmens at Sta Margherita, Mosta Plate 1: Dolmens - large capstones resting on smaller stones 103 Facets of Maltese Prehistory Ta' Gherwa dolmen, south of Gudja. Capstone 7 feet by 6 feet Safi dolmen, associated with Neolithic sherds, and close to Id-Dawwar Neolithic temple Plate 2: Two ofthe dolmens discovered by the Rev. J. Farrugia in 1946 and 1947 104 The Maltese Dolmens yet no satisfactory explanation has been JohnEvans put forward. In 1953 and 1955, the British archaeologist John Evans investigated Other sites where dolmens were brought two atypical dolmens at Wied Moqbol, and to light include those at San Giorgio in on the rather flimsy evidence of some Birzebbuga, and Ta' Cenc in Gozo, where superficial sherds at one site at Ta' they clearly manifest their prominent Hammut, he attributed all the dolmens of positions along the highest edges of the Malta to the Bronze Age. The conclusion plateau. At Gnien Imrik in Xaghra, Gozo, reached by Evans is not justified. the massive stone slab measured twenty Although the sherds at Ta' Hammut feet by sixteen, with a thickness varying dolmen were Bronze Age, those at Id­ between two and four feet. It is readily Dawwar dolmen were Neolithic, whilst apparent from the size and weight of those at Borg in-Nadur dolmen were these dolmens that their erection required Punic and Borg in-Nadur- the sherds a tremendous amount of concerted effort cannot date the dolmens. There have on the part of the Maltese builders, who never been any human remains or must have developed and utilized some cinerary urns anywhere near the Maltese form of engineering system to permit their dolmenic structures, and a sepulchral erection.
Recommended publications
  • Pottery Technology As a Revealer of Cultural And
    Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland) Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse To cite this version: Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse. Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Elsevier, 2020, 58, pp.101170. 10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101170. hal-03051558 HAL Id: hal-03051558 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03051558 Submitted on 10 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 58 (2020) 101170 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Anthropological Archaeology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis T (3100–1600 BC,
    [Show full text]
  • In-Nies Tal-Gudja Qabel Il-Waslata' L-Ordnifmalta
    In-Nies tal-Gudja qabel il-Waslata' l-OrdnifMalta kitba ta' Godfrey Wettinger L-isem tar-rahal Malti tal-Gudja gej minn kelma Gharbija li tfisser gliolja igliira . Bhala isem ta' x'imkien insibuha f'hafna nhawi ta' Malta kif ukoll fi Sqallija u pajjizi ohra, dejjem bl-istess tifsira. Bhala parrocca kienet taghmel rna' dik ta' Birmiftuh, post tefgha ta' gebla 'l boghod minnu, li kellha knisja parrokkjali izda 1- irhula taghha kienu mferrxa madwarha, ezatt bhall-Gudja li kienet 1-eqreb wahda. 1 Gieli gara wkollli ssejhet bizball Birrniftuh. Il-lista ta' 1-irgiel mill-Gudja tad-Dejma Maltija tas-sena 1419-20 fiha xejn inqas minn 38 isem. Dawn aktarx juru li 1-Gudja f' dik is-sena kellha popolazzjoni shiha ta' xi 190 ruh, jigifieri biz-zieda tan-nisa u t-tfal. Hekk il-Gudja kien wiehed mill-irhula ta' daqs nofsani jew harira izghar min-nofs ta' 1-irhula 1-kbar bhal Birkirkarajew Hal Qorrni li k~llhom mal-500 ruh kull wiehed. Kien hemrn irhula ohra li kienu izghar,nghidu ahna bhal Haz-Zabbar u Hal Bisqallin, biex rna nsemmux Hal Millieri u Hal Kaprat.2 Paulu Vella Gullielmu Bonavia Paulu Barbara Thumeu Canzuhuk Orlandu Vella Gullielmu Cuzin Pericuni Pachi Mariu Pachi Antoni Vella ... Janinu Spiteri Antoni Buturra Bringeli Pachi Thumeu Buturra Randinu Vella Peri Hellul J acobinu Pachi Nardu Buturra J akinu Vella Pinu Ricupru Jorgi Mullica Peri Vella Jumia Barbara Antoni Sacco Dimitri Cassar Mainettu Vella Theumeu Hili Masi Saccu Franciscu Cassar Pinu Vella Franchinu Bunichi Dominicu Heries Fabianu Mullica Manfre Vella Nuzu Hili Culaita Galata Cataudu Vella Pinu Cassar Marius Spitali Din hija 1-lista ta' 1-irgiel fid-dejmata' xi hames snin wara (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Tell a Cromlech from a Quoit ©
    How to tell a cromlech from a quoit © As you might have guessed from the title, this article looks at different types of Neolithic or early Bronze Age megaliths and burial mounds, with particular reference to some well-known examples in the UK. It’s also a quick overview of some of the terms used when describing certain types of megaliths, standing stones and tombs. The definitions below serve to illustrate that there is little general agreement over what we could classify as burial mounds. Burial mounds, cairns, tumuli and barrows can all refer to man- made hills of earth or stone, are located globally and may include all types of standing stones. A barrow is a mound of earth that covers a burial. Sometimes, burials were dug into the original ground surface, but some are found placed in the mound itself. The term, barrow, can be used for British burial mounds of any period. However, round barrows can be dated to either the Early Bronze Age or the Saxon period before the conversion to Christianity, whereas long barrows are usually Neolithic in origin. So, what is a megalith? A megalith is a large stone structure or a group of standing stones - the term, megalith means great stone, from two Greek words, megas (meaning: great) and lithos (meaning: stone). However, the general meaning of megaliths includes any structure composed of large stones, which include tombs and circular standing structures. Such structures have been found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, North and South America and may have had religious significance. Megaliths tend to be put into two general categories, ie dolmens or menhirs.
    [Show full text]
  • ARC 112 History of Architecture II
    Prehistoric Architecture Dr. Zeinab Feisal Stone Age period When? Where? How did we know about it? What about social characteristics & Believes? Architecture of the civilization. Stone Age period Occurred before invention of written records No written record from the prehistoric period How did we know about it? Information is gathered from scientific studies of prehistoric objects Many academic disciplines are interested in studying human civilization- archeology, paleontology, anthropology etc The disciplines study prehistoric objects They provide information about civilizations based on studies Early Stone Age (or Paleolithic) Up to 9000 BC New Stone Age (or Neolithic) Stone Age STONE AGE 9000 BC to 3000 BC Stone Age period Not restricted to any particular geographical region Occurred in different locations, Usually close to sources of food, near rivers Stone Age period Life style differed between the Early Stone Age period and the New Stone Age Period Each of the two periods will be examined independently to understand the people and their society Nomadic, always on move Move about in search of food, water, and good climate Got their food through food gathering, hunting and fishing Usually move about in small bands of less than 15 persons Not much is known about their beliefs GOT THEIR FOOD THROUGH FOOD GATHERING, HUNTING AND FISHING GOT THEIR FOOD THROUGH FOOD GATHERING, HUNTING AND FISHING People stopped wandering and settled down in permanent settlements Discovered art of farming and animal husbandry Period
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths and Geology: a Journey Through Monuments, Landscapes and Peoples
    Megaliths and Geology Megálitos e Geologia MEGA-TALKS 2 19-20 November 2015 (Redondo, Portugal) Edited by Rui Boaventura, Rui Mataloto and André Pereira Access Archaeology aeopr ch es r s A A y c g c e o l s o s e A a r c Ah Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978-1-78969-641-7 ISBN 978-1-78969-642-4 (e-Pdf) © the individual authors and Archaeopress 2020 Financial support for the meeting Mega-Talks 2 has been provided by the project Moving megaliths in the Neolithic (PTDC/EPH-ARQ/3971/2012), funded by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal) and the Municipality of Redondo (Portugal). All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents Introduction: Megaliths and Geology: a journey through monuments, landscapes and peoples ........................... iii Moving megaliths in the Neolithic - a multi analytical case study of dolmens in Freixo-Redondo (Alentejo, Portugal). Rui Boaventura, Patrícia Moita, Jorge Pedro, Rui Mataloto, Luis Almeida, Pedro Nogueira, Jaime Máximo, André Pereira, José Francisco Santos & Sara Ribeiro ............................................................... 1 Funerary megalithism in the south of Beira Interior: architectures, spoils and cultural sequences. João Luís Cardoso .................................................................................................................................................................. 25 A look at Proença-a-Nova’s Megalithism (Beira Baixa Intermunicipal Community, UNESCO Global Geopark Naturtejo, Portugal).
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths in Ancient India and Their Possible Association to Astronomy1
    MEGALITHS IN ANCIENT INDIA AND THEIR POSSIBLE ASSOCIATION TO ASTRONOMY1 Mayank N. Vahia Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India And Manipal Advanced Research Group, Manipal University Manipal – 576104, Karnataka, India. E-mail: [email protected] Srikumar M. Menon Faculty of Architecture, Manipal Institite of Technology Manipal – 576104, Karnataka, India. E-mail: [email protected] Riza Abbas Indian Rock Art Research Centre, Nashik (a division of Indian Numismatic, Historical and Cultural Research Foundation), Nashik E-mail: [email protected] Nisha Yadav Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The megalithic monuments of peninsular India, believed to have been erected in the Iron Age (1500BC – 200AD), can be broadly categorized into sepulchral and non-sepulchral in purpose. Though a lot of work has gone into the study of these monuments since Babington first reported megaliths in India in 1823, not much has been understood about the knowledge systems extant in the period these were built – in science and engineering, especially mathematics and astronomy. We take a brief look at the archaeological understanding of megaliths, before taking a detailed assessment of a group of megaliths (in the south Canara region of Karnataka state in South India) that were hitherto assumed to be haphazard clusters of menhirs. Our surveys have indicated positive correlation of sight-lines with sunrise and sunset points on the horizon for both summer and winter solstices. We identify 5 such monuments in the region and present the survey results for one of the sites, demonstrating the astronomical implications. We also discuss the possible use of the typologies of megaliths known as stone alignments/avenues as calendar devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Meditation Parkland Features Stonehenge-Like Monuments
    Island Meditation Parkland features Stonehenge-like Monuments (SEATTLE, Washington) - On a 72-acre parcel logged 20 years ago, forest, streams, ponds, and a peat bog have found new life as "Earth Sanctuary." A 500-year master plan for its restoration now guides the future of this Whidbey Island nature reserve and meditation parkland north of Seattle. More than 4,000 plants from 60 native species are being planted in the first phase of the plan, according to Dan Borroff, the project's award-winning landscape designer. The remarkable project created by a remarkable visionary, Chuck Pettis, has the environmental goal of restoring the landscape's old growth forest, wetlands, and streams - as well as providing habitat for the greatest possible diversity of bird and animal species native to Whidbey Island. See http://www.EarthSanctuary.org. "Earth Sanctuary is designed to restore wholeness to the human spirit, as well as to the natural environment" says Pettis, noted for his megalithic Stonehenge-like environmental artworks, as well as his writings. Visitors, on a reservation basis, are welcome to walk the two miles of Earth Sanctuary's forested paths and to meditate at the sites of the environmental artworks. The stone structures, designed as focal points for meditation, include a labyrinth, a dolmen, and a stone circle. In Borroff's view, planning for human response - both emotional and intellectual - is an integral part of good design. He describes his plant placement choices as "enhanced environmentalism." Borroff believes that the project will "nurture our spirit and transform and re-empower our passion for the land." Pettis, author of Secrets of Sacred Space: Discover and Create Places of Power ($20, Llewellyn), has financed the entire project with personal funds.
    [Show full text]
  • MALTESE E-NEWSLETTER 275 July 2019 1
    MALTESE E-NEWSLETTER 275 July 2019 1 MALTESE E-NEWSLETTER 275 July 2019 Independence Day is annually celebrated on July 4 and is often known as "the Fourth of July". It is the anniversary of the publication of the declaration of independence from Great Britain in 1776. Independence Day is a public holiday. It is a day off for the general population, and schools and most businesses are closed. Independence Day is a patriotic holiday celebrated by Americans worldwide Independence Day is a day of family celebrations with picnics and barbecues, showing a great deal of emphasis on the American tradition of political freedom. Activities associated with the day include watermelon or hotdog eating competitions and sporting events, such as baseball games, three-legged races, swimming activities and tug-of-war games. Many people display the American flag outside their homes or buildings. Many communities arrange fireworks that are often accompanied by patriotic music. The most impressive fireworks are shown on television. Some employees use one or more of their vacation days to create a long weekend so that they can escape the heat at their favourite beach or vacation spot. Independence Day is a patriotic holiday for celebrating the positive aspects of the United States. Many politicians appear at public events to show their support for the history, heritage and people of their country. Above all, people in the United States express and give thanks for the freedom and liberties fought by the first generation of many of today's Americans. The Statue of Liberty is a national monument that is associated with Independence Day.
    [Show full text]
  • New Discoveries and Documentation of Megalithic Structes in Juffain Dolmen Archaeological Field, Jordan
    Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 18, No 1, (2018), pp. 175-197 Copyright © 2018 MAA Open Access. Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1161357 NEW DISCOVERIES AND DOCUMENTATION OF MEGALITHIC STRUCTES IN JUFFAIN DOLMEN ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD, JORDAN Atef Shiyab1, Kennett Schath, Hussein Al-jarrah, Firas Alawneh2, Wassef Al Sekheneh1 1Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology-Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan. 2Department of Conservation Science, Queen Rania Faculty of Tourism & Heritage, Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127 Postal Code 13115 Zarqa, Jordan Received: 02/01/2018 Accepted: 02/02/2018 Corresponding Author: Firas Alawneh ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The research presented here is about documentation, analysis and sharing new discoveries of Juffain mega- lithic field. Using Geographic information system (GIS) to produce topographical maps is the basis for the conservation and the development of a Dolmen Heritage Park. A previous survey with Perugia University, was performed in 2016, which provide insight about the high density of megalithic structures and study of structure distribution. While collecting data for a topographical map, of the structural types there are two different categories, single and centers. Single structures are those that stand alone they are, D, Dolmens; TU, Tumulus; T, Tomb; PA – Patio, W – Wall, CA – Cave, CIS - Cistern, S – Silo, P – Press, QS – Quarry Stone, C – Circle and SS – Standing Stone. Five major stunning discoveries relating to the dolmen culture is found. In rank of Importance, here are the discoveries: (1) borders and boundaries, show that each of the dolmen groups stand alone, (2) domestic meeting places point to a sedentary society, (3) quarries and cup hole cen- ters demonstrate a high scale of distribution of central places, and (4) ritualistic centers indicates a higher level of human relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government White Paper and Interrelated Regions and Districts
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER AND INTERRELATED REGIONS AND DISTRICTS Perit Joseph Magro B.Sc.(Eng.)(Hons.), B.A.(Arch.) Update Note to the Addendum “Interrelated Regions and Districts for Malta and Gozo” Annexed to the Study Paper “Proposals For An Improved Malta Electoral System” This note proposes another solution of interrelated regions and districts, now based on the six regions as detailed in the Local Government White Paper. It also serves as a comparative study to the one put forward in the Addendum where a similar organizational structure of interrelated regions and districts for Malta and Gozo was proposed, with the districts also serving as electoral divisions. October 2018 LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER AND INTERRELATED REGIONS AND DISTRICTS Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 1.1 Reference to the Local Government White Paper 1.2 Reference to the Addendum 1.3 Main Objectives of This Update Note to the Addendum 1.4 Parameters Governing this Exercise 2. THE REGIONS AS ESTABLISHED IN THE WHITE PAPER ……………………………..…..………………………… 4 2.1 Maps of the Regions 3. ESTABLISHING THE DISTRICTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3.1 Hamlets 3.2 Numbering of Regions and Districts 4. COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIES …………………………………………….……………..………………………………….. 6 4.1 Proposed Organizational Structure and Registered Voter Changes 4.2 District Seat Value 4.3 Registered Voter Changes between October 2007 and April 2018 5. CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Appendix 1: Map of the (White Paper) Regions and Proposed Districts …..…..….………………….……… 9 Appendix 2: Map of the Existing Regions of Malta ……………………………………………………………….…… 10 Appendix 3: Map of the Regions as Proposed in the White Paper ………………………………………….…. 11 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Reference to the Local Government White Paper The Local Government White Paper, published on 19th October 2018, refers to the existing five Regions of Malta as established by Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Following Paul from Shipwreck on Malta to Martyrdom in Rome MALTA • SICILY • ITALY Led by Dr
    Following Paul from Shipwreck on Malta to Martyrdom in Rome MALTA • SICILY • ITALY Led by Dr. Carl Rasmussen MAY 11-22, 2021 organized by Following Paul from Shipwreck on Malta to Martyrdom in Rome / May 11-22, 2021 Malta Following Paul from Shipwreck on Malta to Martyrdom in Rome MAY 11-22, 2021 Fri 14 May Ferry to POZZALLO (SICILY) - SYRACUSE – Ferry to REGGIO CALABRIA Early check out, pick up our box breakfasts, meet the English-speaking assistant at our hotel and transfer to the port of Malta. 06:30am Take a ferry VR-100 from Malta to Pozzallo (Sicily) 08:15am Drive to Syracuse (where Paul stayed for three days, Acts 28.12). Meet our guide and visit the archeological park of Syracuse. Drive to Messina (approx. 165km) and take the ferry to Reggio Calabria on the Italian mainland (= Rhegium; Acts 28:13, where Paul stopped). Meet our guide and visit the Museum of Magna Grecia. Check-in to our hotel in Reggio Calabria. Dr. Carl and Mary Rasmussen Dinner at our hotel and overnight. Greetings! Mary and I are excited to invite you to join our handcrafted adult “study” trip entitled Following Paul from Shipwreck on Malta to Sat 15 May PAESTUM - to POMPEII Martyrdom in Rome. We begin our tour on Malta where we will explore the Breakfast and checkout. Drive to Paestum (435km). Visit the archeological bays where the shipwreck of Paul may have occurred as well as the Island of area and the museum of Paestum. Paestum was a major ancient Greek city Malta. Mark Gatt, who discovered an anchor that may have been jettisoned on the coast of the Tyrrhenian Sea in Magna Graecia (southern Italy).
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Western Art 40,000 – 2,000 BCE
    Prehistoric Western Art 40,000 – 2,000 BCE Introduction Prehistoric Europe was an evolving melting pot of developing cultures driven by the arrival of Homo sapiens, migrating from Africa by way of southwest Asia. Mixing and mingling of numerous cultures over the Upper Paleolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic periods in Europe stimulated the emergence of innovative advancements in farming, food preparation, animal domestication, community development, religious traditions and the arts. This report tracks European cultural developments over these prehistoric periods, Figure 1 Europe and the Near East emphasizing each period’s (adapted from Janson’s History of Art, 8th Edition) evolving demographic effects on art development. Then, representative arts of the periods are reviewed by genre, instead of cultural or timeline sequence, in order to better appreciate their commonalities and differences. Appendices identify Homo sapien roots in Africa and selected timeline events that were concurrent with prehistoric human life in Europe. Prehistoric Homo Sapiens in Europe Genetic, carbon dating and archeological evidence suggest that our own species, Homo sapiens, first appeared between 150 and 200 thousand years ago in Africa and migrated to Europe and Asia. The earliest archeological finds that exhibit all the characteristics of modern humans, including large rounded brain cases and small faces and teeth, date to 190 thousand years ago at Omo, Ethiopia. 1 IBM announced in 2011 that the Genographic Project, charting human genetic data, supports a southern route of human migration from Africa via the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in Arabia, suggesting a role for Southwest Asia in the “Out of Africa” expansion of modern humans.
    [Show full text]