DOCSLIB.ORG

EAZA Mangabey Best Practice Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EAZA Mangabey Best Practice Guidelines Cercocebus spp., Lophocebus spp. and Rungwecebus spp. Old World Monkey Taxon Advisory Group Edited by Mª Teresa Abelló (Barcelona Zoo) Tjerk ter Meulen (GaiaZOO) Emile Filip Prins (GaiaZOO) First edition November 2018 EAZA Mangabey Best Practice Guidelines EAZA Old World Monkey Taxon Advisory Group Mangabey subgroup composed of: Tjerk ter Meulen EAZA Old World Monkey TAG Chair EEP Coordinator for the Golden-bellied mangabey, Cercocebus chrysogaster ESB keeper for the Black crested mangabey, Lophocebus aterrimus Mª Teresa Abelló EEP Coordinator for the White-naped mangabey, Cercocebus atys lunulatus ESB keeper for the Cherry-crowned mangabey, Cercocebus torquatus Veterinarian Advisor: Yedra Felter Editors Mª Teresa Abelló Tjerk ter Meulen Parc Zoològic de Barcelona GaiaZOO Parc de la Ciutadella, sn 08003 P.O. Box 68 Barcelona, Spain 6460AB Kerkrade, the Netherlands Tel. +34 932256580 Tel. +31(0)455676070 Parc Zoològic de Barcelona, SP GaiaZOO, Kerkrade, NL [email protected] [email protected] Emile Filip Prins GaiaZOO P.O. Box 68 6460AB Kerkrade, the Netherlands Tel. +31(0)455676070 GaiaZOO, Kerkrade, NL [email protected] Published by: Parc Zoològic de Barcelona, Spain & GaiaZOO, Kerkrade, the Netherlands. 2018. Recommended citation: Abelló, M.T., ter Meulen, T. and Prins, E.F. 2018, EAZA Mangabey Best Practice Guidelines. Parc Zoològic de Barcelona and GaiaZOO. Contributing authors Albert Jiménez Tomàs Universitat de Barcelona, Spain Amelia Griep Wageningen University & Research, the Netherlands Andrea Dempsey West African Primate Conservation Action, Ghana Andrea Payne ZSL London Zoo, United Kingdom Emile Filip Prins GaiaZOO Kerkrade, the Netherlands Eulalia Bohigas Parc Zoològic de Barcelona, Spain Francis Cabana Wildlife Reserves Singapore, Singapore Hugo Fernández Parc Zoològic de Barcelona, Spain Jean-Luc Berthier Ménagerie du Jardin des Plantes, Paris, France Malgorzata Arlet University of California Davis, USA Sian Waters Barbary Macaque Awareness & Conservation (BMAC), Morocco Sonia Sànchez Universitat de Barcelona, Spain Taide Perez Parc Zoològic de Barcelona, Spain Mª Teresa Abelló Parc Zoològic de Barcelona, Spain Tjerk ter Meulen GaiaZOO Kerkrade, the Netherlands Vanesa Almagro Parc Zoològic de Barcelona, Spain Yedra Feltrer ZSL London Zoo, United Kingdom EAZA Disclaimer Copyright © 2017 by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquariums (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA Old World Monkey TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analyzed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation. EAZA Preamble Right from the very beginning it has been the concern of EAZA and the EEPs to encourage and promote the highest possible standards for husbandry of zoo and aquarium animals. For this reason, quite early on, EAZA developed the “Minimum Standards for the Accommodation and Care of Animals in Zoos and Aquaria”. These standards lay down general principles of animal keeping, to which the members of EAZA feel themselves committed. Above and beyond this, some countries have defined regulatory minimum standards for the keeping of individual species regarding the size and furnishings of enclosures etc., which, according to the opinion of authors, should definitely be fulfilled before allowing such animals to be kept within the area of the jurisdiction of those countries. These minimum standards are intended to determine the borderline of acceptable animal welfare. It is not permitted to fall short of these standards. How difficult it is to determine the standards, however, can be seen in the fact that minimum standards vary from country to country. Above and beyond this, specialists of the EEPs and TAGs have undertaken the considerable task of laying down guidelines for keeping individual animal species. Whilst some aspects of husbandry reported in the guidelines will define minimum standards, in general, these guidelines are not to be understood as minimum requirements; they represent best practice. As such the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for keeping animals intend rather to describe the desirable design of enclosures and prerequisites for animal keeping that are, according to the present state of knowledge, considered as being optimal for each species. They intend above all to indicate how enclosures should be designed and what conditions should be fulfilled for the optimal care of individual species. Preface It has been 15 years since the first Husbandry Guidelines have been published for mangabeys. This is the first edition of the Best Practice Guidelines for mangabeys based on the experience and invaluable contribution of 24 institutions keeping the following species: Agile mangabey (Cercocebus agilis agilis), Golden-bellied mangabey (Cercocebus chrysogaster), Sooty mangabey (Cercocebus atys), White-crowned mangabey (Cercocebus lunulatus), Red-capped mangabey (Cercocebus torquatus), Grey-cheeked mangabey (Lophocebus albigena albigena) and Black crested mangabey (Lophocebus aterrimus). We hope you will find these Best Practice Guidelines appealing and easy to read. All the efforts are needed to support mangabey populations in zoos and in the wild; a critical situation for both areas. As was the case with the Husbandry Guidelines, we need to mention that these Best Practice Guidelines are by no means definitive. We hope that through research our knowledge on mangabey care will advance so we can provide the most updated information in future editions. Mangabeys are easier to be kept in actual bigger and naturalized enclosures, and in many cases they can be mixed with other species, enriching the facilities and animal’s life. So we hope that more European zoos will engage in the mangabey preservation task by showing this attractive species to the public. Acknowledgements We would especially like to thank Albert Jiménez, Biologist from the University of Barcelona, who worked so hard in preparing this resulting document with a summary of mangabey genera for these guidelines and introducing all the updated data gathered during the revision process. We also want to thank those involved in the previous edition, namely: Jean Luc Berthier, Sian Waters and Malgorzata Arlet as with them we initiated the compilation on mangabey information also here included. Last but not least, thank you to Katharina Herrmann who encouraged us to edit the Best Practice Guidelines reviewing and amending the text. Executive Summary The current document details knowledge regarding the biology, management and keeping of the polyphyletic group of mangabeys (Cercocebus spp., Lophocebus spp. and Rungwecebus spp.) from the field and within zoos. As will become clear, per species there is information lacking regarding many aspects of their biology and ecology. Hence, the document is set up in such a way that, where appropriate, information can be interpreted from other mangabey species. Section 1: Biology and Field data This section covers an extensive overview of current knowledge regarding the taxonomic classification, morphology, natural distribution, conservation status, nutrition, behaviour and more of all the relevant species and subspecies. Section 2: Management in Zoos and Aquariums This section details Best Practice of management and keeping of mangabey species in zoos. Including topics on enclosure design, specifically focussed on appropriate barriers and enclosure complexity. Furthermore it includes information on optimal feeding practices, use of enrichment, social management and veterinary practices. Throughout are examples of current practice presented. Here it should be emphasized that these guidelines should be seen as a living document as knowledge will only increase through experience and research. Table of Contents Section 1: Biology and field data ............................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Taxonomy .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 Morphology ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.3 Physiology .............................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Targets, Tactics, and Cooperation in the Play Fighting of Two Genera of Old World Monkeys (Mandrillus and Papio): Accounting for Similarities and Differences

    Targets, Tactics, and Cooperation in the Play Fighting of Two Genera of Old World Monkeys (Mandrillus and Papio): Accounting for Similarities and Differences

    2019, 32 Heather M. Hill Editor Peer-reviewed Targets, Tactics, and Cooperation in the Play Fighting of Two Genera of Old World Monkeys (Mandrillus and Papio): Accounting for Similarities and Differences Kelly L. Kraus1, Vivien C. Pellis1, and Sergio M. Pellis1 1 Department of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Canada Play fighting in many species involves partners competing to bite one another while avoiding being bitten. Species can differ in the body targets that are bitten and the tactics used to attack and defend those targets. However, even closely related species that attack and defend the same body target using the same tactics can differ markedly in how much the competitiveness of such interactions is mitigated by cooperation. A degree of cooperation is necessary to ensure that some turn-taking between the roles of attacker and defender occurs, as this is critical in preventing play fighting from escalating into serious fighting. In the present study, the dyadic play fighting of captive troops of 4 closely related species of Old World monkeys, 2 each from 2 genera of Papio and Mandrillus, was analyzed. All 4 species have a comparable social organization, are large bodied with considerable sexual dimorphism, and are mostly terrestrial. In all species, the target of biting is the same – the area encompassing the upper arm, shoulder, and side of the neck – and they have the same tactics of attack and defense. However, the Papio species exhibit more cooperation in their play than do the Mandrillus species, with the former using tactics that make biting easier to attain and that facilitate close bodily contact.
  • Urban Ecology of the Vervet Monkey Chlorocebus Pygerythrus in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa ______

    Urban Ecology of the Vervet Monkey Chlorocebus Pygerythrus in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa ______

    Urban Ecology of the Vervet Monkey Chlorocebus pygerythrus in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa __________________________________ Lindsay L Patterson A thesis presented in fulfilment of the academic requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in Ecological Sciences At the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa August 2017 ABSTRACT The spread of development globally is extensively modifying habitats and often results in competition for space and resources between humans and wildlife. For the last few decades a central goal of urban ecology research has been to deepen our understanding of how wildlife communities respond to urbanisation. In the KwaZulu-Natal Province of South Africa, urban and rural transformation has reduced and fragmented natural foraging grounds for vervet monkeys Chlorocebus pygerythrus. However, no data on vervet urban landscape use exist. They are regarded as successful urban exploiters, yet little data have been obtained prior to support this. This research investigated aspects of the urban ecology of vervet monkeys in three municipalities of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), as well as factors that may predict human-monkey conflict. Firstly, through conducting an urban wildlife survey, we were able to assess residents’ attitudes towards, observations of and conflict with vervet monkeys, investigating the potential drivers of intragroup variation in spatial ecology, and identifying predators of birds’ nests. We analysed 602 surveys submitted online and, using ordinal regression models, we ascertained that respondents’ attitudes towards vervets were most influenced by whether or not they had had aggressive interactions with them, by the belief that vervet monkeys pose a health risk and by the presence of bird nests, refuse bins and house raiding on their properties.
  • Body Measurements for the Monkeys of Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea

    Body Measurements for the Monkeys of Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea

    Primate Conservation 2009 (24): 99–105 Body Measurements for the Monkeys of Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea Thomas M. Butynski¹,², Yvonne A. de Jong² and Gail W. Hearn¹ ¹Bioko Biodiversity Protection Program, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA ²Eastern Africa Primate Diversity and Conservation Program, Nanyuki, Kenya Abstract: Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, has a rich (eight genera, 11 species), unique (seven endemic subspecies), and threat- ened (five species) primate fauna, but the taxonomic status of most forms is not clear. This uncertainty is a serious problem for the setting of priorities for the conservation of Bioko’s (and the region’s) primates. Some of the questions related to the taxonomic status of Bioko’s primates can be resolved through the statistical comparison of data on their body measurements with those of their counterparts on the African mainland. Data for such comparisons are, however, lacking. This note presents the first large set of body measurement data for each of the seven species of monkeys endemic to Bioko; means, ranges, standard deviations and sample sizes for seven body measurements. These 49 data sets derive from 544 fresh adult specimens (235 adult males and 309 adult females) collected by shotgun hunters for sale in the bushmeat market in Malabo. Key Words: Bioko Island, body measurements, conservation, monkeys, morphology, taxonomy Introduction gordonorum), and surprisingly few such data exist even for some of the more widespread species (for example, Allen’s Comparing external body measurements for adult indi- swamp monkey Allenopithecus nigroviridis, northern tala- viduals from different sites has long been used as a tool for poin monkey Miopithecus ogouensis, and grivet Chlorocebus describing populations, subspecies, and species of animals aethiops).
  • The Taxonomy of Primates in the Laboratory Context

    The Taxonomy of Primates in the Laboratory Context

    P0800261_01 7/14/05 8:00 AM Page 3 C HAPTER 1 The Taxonomy of Primates T HE T in the Laboratory Context AXONOMY OF P Colin Groves RIMATES School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 3 What are species? D Taxonomy: EFINITION OF THE The biological Organizing nature species concept Taxonomy means classifying organisms. It is nowadays commonly used as a synonym for systematics, though Disagreement as to what precisely constitutes a species P strictly speaking systematics is a much broader sphere is to be expected, given that the concept serves so many RIMATE of interest – interrelationships, and biodiversity. At the functions (Vane-Wright, 1992). We may be interested basis of taxonomy lies that much-debated concept, the in classification as such, or in the evolutionary implica- species. tions of species; in the theory of species, or in simply M ODEL Because there is so much misunderstanding about how to recognize them; or in their reproductive, phys- what a species is, it is necessary to give some space to iological, or husbandry status. discussion of the concept. The importance of what we Most non-specialists probably have some vague mean by the word “species” goes way beyond taxonomy idea that species are defined by not interbreeding with as such: it affects such diverse fields as genetics, biogeog- each other; usually, that hybrids between different species raphy, population biology, ecology, ethology, and bio- are sterile, or that they are incapable of hybridizing at diversity; in an era in which threats to the natural all. Such an impression ultimately derives from the def- world and its biodiversity are accelerating, it affects inition by Mayr (1940), whereby species are “groups of conservation strategies (Rojas, 1992).
  • Conservation News

    Conservation News

    Conservation news New species of monkey discovered in www.redlist.org/info/categories_criteria2001.html), the Tanzania: the Critically Endangered major criteria being its extremely limited distribution, highland mangabey Lophocebus kipunji fragmentation into two populations, and the likelihood that its abundance is low. In Ndundulu Forest in the A new species of monkey, the first to be discovered in Udzungwas the major concern is that there are likely to Africa since 1984, has been unexpectedly found in two be very few Highland mangabeys remaining, perhaps separate montane forest areas in Tanzania: Ndundulu fewer than 500 animals. Our preliminary surveys found Forest of the Udzungwa Mountains and Rungwe- only three groups, all within a 3 km2 area; previous Livingstone in the Southern Highlands, 350 km from surveys in this forest and discussions with local villagers Ndundulu. The monkey is a mangabey and has been indicated that the mangabey is absent from much of named the Highland mangabey Lophocebus kipunji. The Ndundulu Forest. The forest is in good condition, common name reflects the fact that it is found in forests although its status of Forest Reserve, as it is now classi- at elevations above 1,300 m and as high as 2,450 m, fied, does not provide the degree of monitoring and - where temperatures can drop to 3°C. The species protection that will fully assure survival of this small name, kipunji (pronounced kip-oon-jee), is the name that population of the mangabey. We are continuing efforts local people in the Southern Highlands have for the ‘shy to encourage the Tanzanian government to incorporate monkey’ they reported seeing from time to time in the Ndundulu Forest Reserve into adjacent Udzungwa forest.
  • The Behavioral Ecology of the Tibetan Macaque

    The Behavioral Ecology of the Tibetan Macaque

    Fascinating Life Sciences Jin-Hua Li · Lixing Sun Peter M. Kappeler Editors The Behavioral Ecology of the Tibetan Macaque Fascinating Life Sciences This interdisciplinary series brings together the most essential and captivating topics in the life sciences. They range from the plant sciences to zoology, from the microbiome to macrobiome, and from basic biology to biotechnology. The series not only highlights fascinating research; it also discusses major challenges associ- ated with the life sciences and related disciplines and outlines future research directions. Individual volumes provide in-depth information, are richly illustrated with photographs, illustrations, and maps, and feature suggestions for further reading or glossaries where appropriate. Interested researchers in all areas of the life sciences, as well as biology enthu- siasts, will find the series’ interdisciplinary focus and highly readable volumes especially appealing. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15408 Jin-Hua Li • Lixing Sun • Peter M. Kappeler Editors The Behavioral Ecology of the Tibetan Macaque Editors Jin-Hua Li Lixing Sun School of Resources Department of Biological Sciences, Primate and Environmental Engineering Behavior and Ecology Program Anhui University Central Washington University Hefei, Anhui, China Ellensburg, WA, USA International Collaborative Research Center for Huangshan Biodiversity and Tibetan Macaque Behavioral Ecology Anhui, China School of Life Sciences Hefei Normal University Hefei, Anhui, China Peter M. Kappeler Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center Leibniz Institute for Primate Research Göttingen, Germany Department of Anthropology/Sociobiology University of Göttingen Göttingen, Germany ISSN 2509-6745 ISSN 2509-6753 (electronic) Fascinating Life Sciences ISBN 978-3-030-27919-6 ISBN 978-3-030-27920-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27920-2 This book is an open access publication.
  • Pest Risk Assessment

    Pest Risk Assessment

    PEST RISK ASSESSMENT De Brazza‟s Monkey Cercopithecus neglectus Photo: Aaron Logan from Wikimedia Commons under the Creative Commons Attribution 1.0 Generic license June 2011 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Resource Management and Conservation Division Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment 2011 Information in this publication may be reproduced provided that any extracts are acknowledged. This publication should be cited as: DPIPWE (2011) Pest Risk Assessment: De Brazza’s Monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus). Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Hobart, Tasmania. About this Pest Risk Assessment This pest risk assessment is developed in accordance with the Policy and Procedures for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Vertebrate Wildlife in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2011). The policy and procedures set out conditions and restrictions for the importation of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians pursuant to s32 of the Nature Conservation Act 2002. This pest risk assessment is prepared by DPIPWE for the use within the Department. For more information about this Pest Risk Assessment, please contact: Wildlife Management Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Address: GPO Box 44, Hobart, TAS. 7001, Australia. Phone: 1300 386 550 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Disclaimer The information provided in this Pest Risk Assessment is provided in good faith. The Crown, its officers, employees and agents do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information in this Pest Risk Assessment and/or reliance on its availability at any time.
  • Controlled Animals

    Controlled Animals

    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
  • Mandrillus Leucophaeus Poensis)

    Mandrillus Leucophaeus Poensis)

    Ecology and Behavior of the Bioko Island Drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus poensis) A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Jacob Robert Owens in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2013 i © Copyright 2013 Jacob Robert Owens. All Rights Reserved ii Dedications To my wife, Jen. iii Acknowledgments The research presented herein was made possible by the financial support provided by Primate Conservation Inc., ExxonMobil Foundation, Mobil Equatorial Guinea, Inc., Margo Marsh Biodiversity Fund, and the Los Angeles Zoo. I would also like to express my gratitude to Dr. Teck-Kah Lim and the Drexel University Office of Graduate Studies for the Dissertation Fellowship and the invaluable time it provided me during the writing process. I thank the Government of Equatorial Guinea, the Ministry of Fisheries and the Environment, Ministry of Information, Press, and Radio, and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism for the opportunity to work and live in one of the most beautiful and unique places in the world. I am grateful to the faculty and staff of the National University of Equatorial Guinea who helped me navigate the geographic and bureaucratic landscape of Bioko Island. I would especially like to thank Jose Manuel Esara Echube, Claudio Posa Bohome, Maximilliano Fero Meñe, Eusebio Ondo Nguema, and Mariano Obama Bibang. The journey to my Ph.D. has been considerably more taxing than I expected, and I would not have been able to complete it without the assistance of an expansive list of people. I would like to thank all of you who have helped me through this process, many of whom I lack the space to do so specifically here.
  • DRILL INFO Issue 12, August 2011

    DRILL INFO Issue 12, August 2011

    DRILL INFO Issue 12, August 2011 Dear members, dear friends of the Drill! Thanks for help from „Save the Drill“! The technical preparations for the reintroduction of the first big group of around 100 Drills into Afi Mountains could be finished. We will report about this in more detail on the annual member meeting on Saturday 27th August at the Erlebnis-Zoo Hannover. We are looking forward to your attendance! Your editorial department Limbe Wi ldlife Centre, Cameroon and Drill Ranch, Nigeria, a field report It was my dream to work with wild animals, especially with primates. When I was a small boy, I saw my first Drill in a zoo and recently I remembered this interesting specie. From 11/30/2010 to 01/30/2011 I completed an internship from for my veterinary study at the Limbe Wildlife Centre (LWC) and with Pandrillus in Nigeria. At the LWC and especially at the Drill Ranch in Nigeria the Drills are of high importance. On the Drill Ranch these animals are the only ones which are systematically bred to be reintroduced into the wild. Alone in Nigeria more than 40 offspring were born in 2010. This success is especially due to the natural housing in big groups, in which many males have to compete for access to the females. Due to the increasing number of individuals in the groups the space for the Drills at the LWC is slowly decreasing. A new and bigger enclosure on an already existing area is already planned. A reintroduction project like in Nigeria is also planned.
  • NATIONAL STUDBOOK Pig Tailed Macaque (Macaca Leonina)

    NATIONAL STUDBOOK Pig Tailed Macaque (Macaca Leonina)

    NATIONAL STUDBOOK Pig Tailed Macaque (Macaca leonina) Published as a part of the Central Zoo Authority sponsored project titled “Development and maintenance of studbooks for selected endangered species in Indian zoos” Data: Till December 2013 Published: March 2014 NATIONAL STUDBOOK Pig Tailed Macaque (Macaca leonine) Published as a part of the Central Zoo Authority sponsored project titled “Development and maintenance of studbooks for selected endangered species in Indian zoos” Compiled and analyzed by Ms. Nilofer Begum Junior Research Fellow Project Consultant Dr. Anupam Srivastav, Ph.D. Supervisors Dr. Parag Nigam Shri. P.C. Tyagi Copyright © WII, Dehradun, and CZA, New Delhi, 2014 This report may be quoted freely but the source must be acknowledged and cited as: Nigam P., Nilofer B., Srivastav A. & Tyagi P.C. (2014) National Studbook of Pig-tailed Macaque (Macaca leonina), Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun and Central Zoo Authority, New Delhi. FOREWORD For species threatened with extinction in their natural habitats ex-situ conservation offers an opportunity for ensuring their long-term survival. This can be ensured by scientific management to ensure their long term genetic viability and demographic stability. Pedigree information contained in studbooks forms the basis for this management. The Central Zoo Authority (CZA) in collaboration with zoos in India has initiated a conservation breeding program for threatened species in Indian zoos. As a part of this endeavor a Memorandum of Understanding has been signed with the Wildlife Institute of India for compilation and update of studbooks of identified species in Indian zoos. As part of the project outcomes the WII has compiled the studbook for Pig tailed macaque (Macaca leonina) in Indian zoos.
  • The Genome of the Vervet (Chlorocebus Aethiops Sabaeus)

    The Genome of the Vervet (Chlorocebus Aethiops Sabaeus)

    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Resource The genome of the vervet (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) Wesley C. Warren,1 Anna J. Jasinska,2,3 Raquel García-Pérez,4 Hannes Svardal,5 Chad Tomlinson,1 Mariano Rocchi,6 Nicoletta Archidiacono,6 Oronzo Capozzi,6 Patrick Minx,1 Michael J. Montague,1 Kim Kyung,1 LaDeana W. Hillier,1 Milinn Kremitzki,1 Tina Graves,1 Colby Chiang,1 Jennifer Hughes,7 Nam Tran,2 Yu Huang,2 Vasily Ramensky,2 Oi-wa Choi,2 Yoon J. Jung,2 Christopher A. Schmitt,2 Nikoleta Juretic,8 Jessica Wasserscheid,8 Trudy R. Turner,9,10 Roger W. Wiseman,11 Jennifer J. Tuscher,11 Julie A. Karl,11 Jörn E. Schmitz,12 Roland Zahn,13 David H. O’Connor,11 Eugene Redmond,14 Alex Nisbett,14 Béatrice Jacquelin,15 Michaela C. Müller-Trutwin,15 Jason M. Brenchley,16 Michel Dione,17 Martin Antonio,17 Gary P. Schroth,18 Jay R. Kaplan,19 Matthew J. Jorgensen,19 Gregg W.C. Thomas,20 Matthew W. Hahn,20 Brian J. Raney,21 Bronwen Aken,22 Rishi Nag,22 Juergen Schmitz,23 Gennady Churakov,23,24 Angela Noll,23 Roscoe Stanyon,25 David Webb,26 Francoise Thibaud-Nissen,26 Magnus Nordborg,5 Tomas Marques-Bonet,4 Ken Dewar,8 George M. Weinstock,27 Richard K. Wilson,1 and Nelson B. Freimer2 1The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA; 2Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA; 3Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy