DOCSLIB.ORG

ECON 3240 Final Presentation Review Checklist Spring 2020 Checklist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ECON 3240 Final Presentation Review Checklist Spring 2020 Checklist ECON 3240 Final Presentation review Checklist Spring 2020 Checklist, please, if possible: Last minute pptx presentation hard suggestions: please do cite at least one reference on every slide (page or minute) do number slides and Figures so I can comment, use any google scholar author, year format (see APA guidelines on how to cite YouTube video and other videos, start and end with 4-5 key points (unless you have better ones) when in doubt email me I should reply (I am socially isolated for now…) Most common problems are highlighted Follow the 666 rule, 20+ point minimum font size, light background, dark text cut and paste pictures as JPEG Use ADA compliant file names that describe the file (no spaces!) ECON3240ProjectTitleyournam.pptx Number all slides using a running header or footer (change for new authors) Add all references at the end in any standard author, date title format (see GS “ list) Make sure each slide has at least one author, year, page reference, as in B&D, 2019, p. 127* Include at least on reference to course reading and one to an economics reading (Brookings or NBER or an AEA journal, for example) Stuck on this one? Please contact me** YouTube videos are generally welcome, cite minute and use APA guidelines if possible/ Except for the Economist Newspaper, most web-based articles have authors cite them please* If a reference at the end of your presentation is not cited, perhaps delete it of find a slide to cite it on? Begin and end your slides with a key points slide (Contents or background slides Ok too but after key points) Bonus ADA requirement, describe pictures in words, include source (not just google* but you can use google images to find the source of photos… ) Example from a Presentation titled (for example): COVID-19 Exacerbates Education Inequality COVID-19 has laid bare the vast inequities in U.S. public education system [summary slide title] • Parents with “frontline” jobs cannot stay home and put their children at risk nightly • Low income parents may not have computers or internet access • Low income or homeless families may not have quite place to study or participate online. • Public school classes are larger teachers less well equipped • NYS/NYC schools are very segregated by race and income • Wealthier parents use private school and often have 2nd homes for self-quarantine Potentially equalizing impacts of COVID-19 for NYS public school kids* 1. Many selective Universities are dropping SAT/ACT exams for admissions 2. Low income students may gain access to computers & internet with help from schools or NGOs 3. Public school classes are larger teachers less well equipped 4. Online education could reduce the cost of college education for students and colleges 5. NYC/NYS has excellent SUNY/CUNY system special COVID scholarships? 6. We know attending these colleges is a great income leveler (reducing inequality) Silver linings, natural experiments and unexpected negative shocks can be helpful in long run. Schumpeter call the constructive reinvention role of recessions “creative destruction” Crises create opportunities for recalibrating, getting fired for examples forces us to recalibrate and focus on what we really want forcing us to make important decisions about what we want. **Economics reference for above try Brookings of NBER or Voxeu (lots of material on COVID-19 shock) Gender Group resources Let me know if you need access to any of these publications, See http://www.gdsnet.org/HeatherBousheyUnbound3H.pdf http://www.gdsnet.org/Lera2018Proceedingsof2018MeetingsAnselandBousheyPaper.pdf UBI references: Everywhere basic income has been tried, in one map - Vox https://www.vox.com › future-perfect › universal-basic-income-ubi-map Feb 19, 2020 - With a few exceptions — Kenya, where a big experiment in universal basic income (UBI) is underway; Iran, which has a nationwide unconditional ... The important questions about universal basic income ... - Vox https://www.vox.com › universal-basic-income-ubi-nber-study 1. Feb 13, 2019 - Universal basic income — the idea of giving everybody money ... In their paper, the economists argue that a developed-world UBI is more ... What happens if you replace every social program with a ... - Vox https://www.vox.com › basic-income-oecd-aei-replace-welfare-state 1. May 30, 2017 - Would it make sense to fund a UBI with Social Security? ... In every other country, though, a truly universal basic income makes poverty worse, ... A basic income really could end poverty forever - Vox https://www.vox.com › policy-and-politics › universal-basic-income-revie... 1. Jul 17, 2017 - One of UBI's most vocal advocates is former Service Employees ... social breakdown — unless a universal basic income lets people out of work ... The 2 most popular critiques of basic income are both ... - Vox https://www.vox.com › policy-and-politics › basic-income-critiques-cost-w... 1. Jul 20, 2017 - Making the case for universal basic income (UBI) has always required advocates to address two criticisms of the idea: Giving people cash will ... WP Education <https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/04/14/how-covid-19-has-laid-bare-vast-inequities-us-public- education/> Everywhere basic income has been tried, in one map Which countries have experimented with basic income — and what were the results? By Sigal Samuel Feb 19, 2020, 8:10am EST This story is part of a group of stories called Future Perfect Finding the best ways to do good. After hundreds of years, basic income seems to be finally catching on. The general idea — that the government should give every citizen a regular infusion of free money with no strings attached — has been around since the 16th century. But it’s experienced a remarkable resurgence over the past few years, moving from the fringes into the mainstream. Advocates ranging from tech billionaire Mark Zuckerberg to libertarian economist Milton Friedman have endorsed it. Andrew Yang popularized it on the Democratic debate stage. And around the world, countries are running pilot programs to test it. With a few exceptions — Kenya, where a big experiment in universal basic income (UBI) is underway; Iran, which has a nationwide unconditional cash transfer program; and Alaska, which gives an annual dividend to everyone in the state — basic income programs are offering money to small groups of a few hundred or a few thousand people, not an entire polity. In other words, they offer a basic income, but not a universal basic income. These small-scale trials are necessary because governments want to have a good sense of what the effects will be before they start shelling out many billions or trillions of dollars. Proponents of basic income argue it’s the best way to end poverty: Just give everyone money! Some also say it’ll help society cope with a coming era of automation-induced joblessness. And the evidence so far suggests that getting a basic income tends to boost happiness, health, school attendance, and trust in social institutions, while reducing crime. But critics worry that it will disincentivize work, cheating economies out of productivity and cheating individuals out of the sense of meaning that work can bring. Plus, they say, it’s just plain unaffordable for the government to pay every citizen enough to live on regardless of whether they work. The evidence so far does not support these critiques, as you’ll see. Below are all the places that are trying or have tried some version of basic income. You’ll find that only unconditional cash transfers are included here. Some 130 countries, from Mexico to Italy to Uganda, have instituted conditional cash transfers, which may require recipients to send their kids to school or go for health checkups. Although these programs have proven beneficial in some cases, they’re not the subject of this piece. Note that most of the basic income projects here are funded by governments, but a few are funded by private donors. Scroll down for details on how each place gave out or is giving out free money — and what behavioral effects it seems to have on the recipients. Another long-running program is the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Casino Dividend in North Carolina. Since 1997, revenue from a casino on tribal land has been given to every tribal member, no strings attached. Each person gets on average somewhere between $4,000 and $6,000 per year. Economists found that it doesn’t make them work less. It does lead to improved education and mental health, and decreased addiction and crime. Between 1968 and 1974, the US experimented with giving cash to around 7,500 people in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Iowa, North Carolina, Seattle, Denver, and Gary, Indiana. The money proved beneficial to recipients but did modestly reduce the hours they worked; Dylan Matthews has explained for Vox why we shouldn’t make too much of that slight reduction. What about current projects? Stockton, California, is in the midst of an 18-month experiment: It’s giving $500 per month to 125 people. The money comes from individual and foundation philanthropy, with the initial $1 million in funding coming from the Economic Security Project. The first batch of data shows the recipients are mostly spending the money on food, clothes, and utility bills. Y Combinator, which previously ran a small trial in Oakland, California, is now planning to start a new trial elsewhere in the US. Canada Between 1974 and 1979, Canada ran a randomized controlled trial in the province of Manitoba, choosing one farming town, Dauphin, as a “saturation site” where every family was eligible to participate in a basic income experiment. The basic income seemed to benefit residents’ physical and mental health — there was a decline in doctor visits and an 8.5 percent reduction in the rate of hospitalization — and high school graduation rates improved, too.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Macroeconomic Effects of Universal Basic Income Programs
    The Macroeconomic Effects of Universal Basic Income Programs Andre´ Victor Doherty Luduvice† University of Pennsylvania Job Market Paper This version: December 15, 2019 (click here for the latest version) Abstract What are the consequences of a nationwide reform of a transfer system based on means-testing towards one of unconditional transfers? I answer this question with a quantitative model to assess the general equilibrium, inequality, and welfare effects of substituting the current U.S. in- come security system with a Universal Basic Income (UBI) policy. To do so, I develop an overlap- ping generations model with idiosyncratic income risk that incorporates intensive and extensive margins of labor supply, on-the-job learning, and child-bearing costs. The tax-transfer system closely mimics the U.S. design. I calibrate the model to the U.S. economy and conduct coun- terfactual analyses that implement reforms towards a UBI. I find that an expenditure-neutral reform has moderate impacts on the labor supply response of agents but induces aggregate cap- ital and output to grow due to larger precautionary savings. A UBI of $ 1,000 monthly requires a substantial increase in the tax rate of consumption used to clear the government budget and leads to an overall decrease of the macroeconomic aggregates, stemming from a sharp drop in labor. In both cases, the economy has more disposable income but less consumption at the bottom of their distributions. The UBI economy constitutes a welfare loss at the transition if expenditure-neutral and results in a gain in the second scenario. Despite relative losses, a ma- jority of newborn households supports both UBI reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • "Basic Income Grant" Pilotprojekt in Otjivero-Omitara, Namibia
    SCHULVEREIN DE LA SALLE Gymnasium, Realgymnasium und Oberstufenrealgymnasium mit ÖR 1210 Wien, Anton Böck-Gasse 37 Tel.: +43/1/29125-760 Fax.: +43/1/29125-763 "Basic Income Grant" Pilotprojekt in Otjivero-Omitara, Namibia VORWISSENSCHAFTLICHE ARBEIT Julia Waygand, 8A (E-Mail: [email protected]) Abgabedatum: 15.02.2017 Betreuungslehrerin/Betreuungslehrer: Mag.a phil. Julia Müller Homepage: http://www.delasalle.at E-Mail: [email protected] UID-Nr. ATU65056039 / ZVR-Zahl: 949515576 / DVR-Nr. 4001132 Abstract Ein bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen für alle: Das war das Ziel der „Basic Income Grant“ Koalition, als sie 2004 beschloss ein Pilotprojekt in den Orten Otjivero und Omitara im Osten Namibias zu initiieren. Die Durchführung sollte den Beweis für die Sinnhaftigkeit eines Grundeinkommens erbringen und mithilfe dessen die Regierung von einer Einführung auf landesweiter Ebene überzeugen. Zunächst gewährt die vorliegende vorwissenschaftliche Arbeit einen Überblick der Geschichte Namibias, um die Situation des Staates widerzuspiegeln. Danach folgt das Hauptthema meiner Arbeit, die Ausführung des Projekts und deren Resultate. Abschließend werden die Schritte seit der Stilllegung und die allgemeinen Reaktionen beschrieben. Als persönlicher Einblick dient das beiliegende Gespräch mit dem damaligen Koalitionsleiter und derzeitigen Sozialminister Zephania Kameeta. Ansonsten ist ausschließlich mit empirischen Quellen gearbeitet worden. Die Arbeit gibt Aufschluss darüber, welche Konsequenzen das monatliche Grundeinkommen
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Income with High Open Innovation Dynamics: the Way to the Entrepreneurial State
    Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Concept Paper Basic Income with High Open Innovation Dynamics: The Way to the Entrepreneurial State Jinhyo Joseph Yun 1,* , KyungBae Park 2 , Sung Duck Hahm 3 and Dongwook Kim 4 1 Department of Open Innovation, Open Innovation Academy of SOItmC, Convergence Research Center for Future Automotive Technology of DGIST, Daegu 42988, Korea 2 Department of Business Administration, Sangji University, 83 Sangjidae-gil, Wonju, Gangwon-do 26339, Korea 3 Korean Institute for Presidential Studies (KIPS), Seoul 06306, Korea 4 Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 May 2019; Accepted: 25 June 2019; Published: 11 July 2019 Abstract: Currently, the world economy is approaching a near-zero growth rate. Governments should move from a market-failure-oriented to a system-failure-oriented approach to understanding this problem, and transform to an entrepreneurial state to motivate the Schumpeterian dynamics of open innovation. We want to answer the following research question in this study: “How can a government enact policies to conquer the growth limits imposed on the economy by inequality or the control of big businesses?” First, we conducted a literature review to establish the concept of building a causal loop model of basic income with open innovation dynamics. Second, we built a causal loop model which includes basic income and all factors of open innovation dynamics. Third, we proved our causal loop model through a meta-analysis of global cases of basic income. Our research indicates that reflective basic income with permissionless open innovation, capital fluidity, a sharing economy, and a platform tax can motivate open innovation dynamics and arrive at a method by which an entrepreneurial state can conquer the growth limits of capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Practice of Basic Income
    LESSONS FROM THE PRACTICE OF BASIC INCOME A COMPENDIUM OF WRITINGS AND DATA MARCUS BRANCAGLIONE THIS BOOK WAS DISTRIBUTED BY: www.PaperRevolution.org © 2016 Marcus Brancaglione. All this material is protected under Licença ⒶRobinRight. To see a copy of this license, please go to http://robinright.org Autor: Marcus Brancaglione Organization: Bruna Augusto Translation by Monica Puntel, Leonardo Puntel, Carolina Fisher English Revison by Tracy Halls Brancaglione, Marcus. Lessons from the practice of Basic Income. A compendium of writings and data. São Paulo. Clube de autores, 2015. Number of pages. 124 p. Assuntos: 1.Libertarism. 2.Democracy. 3.Republic. TO MY LOVE AND TO MY CHILDREN SUMÁRIO PART I 8 The Word as a Revolutionary Act 8 DISCOURSE FOR THE BUDAPEST CONFERENCE 9 REVOLUTIONARY SPEECH FOR THE UNCONDITIONAL BASIC INCOME AT THE GOETHEANUM 38 Organization For The United Peoples 38 ABOUT THE REVOLUTION OF THE ECO-LIBERTARIANISM BASIC INCOME 46 LIBERTY, PROPERTY AND IDENTITY 55 LETTER TO THE EUROPEAN BASIC INCOME WEEK 2015 65 ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF A NATIONAL BASIC INCOME? 67 SEASTEADING PROPOSAL FOR THE REFUGEES 70 BASIC INCOME AND THE REFUGEES IN BRAZIL 76 THE REFUGEES NEED UNCONDITIONAL BASIC INCOME FREE OF ELECTORAL POLITICAL PARTY TRAPS. 83 NON-WHITES OF THE WORLD UNITE 87 BBC NEWS TITLE: WHY DOES FINLAND WANT TO PAY A MINIMUM WAGE SALARY FOR ALL. 93 SUBTITLE: WHAT WOULD YOU SAY IF YOUR PRESIDENT ANNOUNCED THAT STARTING FROM TODAY EVERY CITIZEN – WORKING OR NOT – WOULD RECEIVE BASIC INCOME? 93 NON-GOVERNAMENTAL TO ECO-LIBERTARIAN BASIC
    [Show full text]
  • BIEN - Basic Income Earth Network NEW SFLASH 47 September 2007 **************************************************
    BIEN - Basic Income Earth Network NEW SFLASH 47 September 2007 ************************************************** www.basicincome.org The Basic Income Earth Network was founded in 1986 as the Basic Income European Network. It expanded its scope from Europe to the Earth in 2004. It serves as a link between individuals and groups committed to or interested in basic income, and fosters informed discussion on this topic throughout the world. The present NewsFlash has been prepared with the help of Paul Nollen, Simon Birnbaum, David Casassas, Erik Christensen, Claudia & Dirk Haardman, Jurgen De W ispelaere, Phil Dines, Sandro Gobetti, Seàn Healy, Marek Hrubec, Malcolm Torry, Philippe Van Parijs, and Karl W iderquist. This NewsFlash can be downloaded as a PDF document on our website www.basicincome.org CONTENTS 1. Editorial : Tribute to André Gorz 2. 12th BIEN Congress June 2008 3. Events 4.Glimpses of national debates 5. Publications 6. New Links 7. About BIEN _____ 1. EDITORIAL: Tribute to André Gorz French social philosopher and journalist André Gorz (born in 1923) committed suicide with his wife in their home in Vosnon (France), and was found dead on September 24, 2007. Gorz was one of the most prominent advocates of an unconditional basic income. In his classic essays on work, socialism, or green politics, he had first expressed some scepticism with regard to the idea of an —income by right“. His chapter in Arguing for Basic Income (edited by Philippe Van Parijs, Verso, 1996) was significantly entitled: —On the Difference between Society and Community, and W hy Basic Income Cannot by itself Confer Full Membership of Either“.
    [Show full text]
  • Renta Básica Universal
    Renta Básica Universal I. Introducción La situación de pobreza y pobreza extrema, la desigualdad en el nivel de ingresos, las crisis económicas, la transformación tecnológica y digital, así como el efecto de la globalización sobre el empleo, entre otros, están generando un debate sobre la implementación de una Renta Básica Universal -RBU- como mecanismo de protección social. Las redes de protección social son medidas para facilitar los cambios estructurales de la economía y hacerlos socialmente aceptables. La discusión pertinente es si el Estado, en su calidad de administrador de tales redes, debe incorporar dentro de sus políticas la implementación de una RBU, tomando en cuenta que los recursos son escasos y debiesen asignarse de una manera eficiente. Recientemente en Finlandia se ha puesto en marcha un proyecto que ha levantado la discusión sobre las ventajas de implementar una política de RBU. Tomando en cuenta que este tipo de modelos se está debatiendo en diversas partes del mundo, especialmente en Europa, se estima oportuno conocer algunos precedentes (tanto teóricos como experiencias), los conceptos de lo que se entiende por RBU, los argumentos a favor y en contra de su aplicación, así como una evaluación de lo que podría significar en el caso de Guatemala. II. Concepto y experiencias 1. Definición y características La Basic Income Earth Network -BIEN-1 define el concepto de RBU como un pago periódico en efectivo entregado incondicionalmente a todas las personas sobre una base individual, sin necesidad de medios o requisito de trabajo. La RBU no debe confundirse con los diversos subsidios condicionados existentes, propios del estado de bienestar, en los que la recepción de beneficios está condicionada a que se cumpla con los requisitos establecidos y cuya verificación la realiza el sector público.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Basic Income Versus Unemployment Insurance
    IZA DP No. 8667 Universal Basic Income versus Unemployment Insurance Alice Fabre Stéphane Pallage Christian Zimmermann November 2014 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Universal Basic Income versus Unemployment Insurance Alice Fabre Aix Marseille University (Aix Marseille School of Economics, CNRS & EHESS) Stéphane Pallage ESG UQAM and CIRPEE, Université du Québec à Montréal Christian Zimmermann Federal Reserve Bank of St-Louis, IZA, RCEA and CESifo Discussion Paper No. 8667 November 2014 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTRONIC VIVANT- EUROPE N° 140 March 2017)
    Rue de l’Escaille, 14 7070 Mignault (Belgium) EUROPE FR. Brasseur Jean-Paul 32 (0) 499 35 85 72 DE, FR, EN Meyer Joseph 32(0) 080-227689 [email protected] http://www.vivant-europe.eu Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/pages/Vivant- Europe/802200473187251 “Liberate work by removing its tax burden and finance social security by taxing the consumption of goods, which most often are produced by machine.” (+ unconditional Basic Income for all ) ELECTRONIC VIVANT- EUROPE N° 140 March 2017) Summary 0. Preliminary remark 1. The treaties of Rome are 60 years old Roger Van Campenhout 2. BenoÎt Hamon’s Presidential programme (France) A. Benoît Hamon’s rally in Paris January 2017 (extracts) B. Benoît Hamon’s rally in Lille on 27 January 2017 (extracts) C. Benoît Hamon’s speech at ‘La Mutualité’ (Paris) 3. Emmanuel macron*and the universal basic income 0. PRELIMINARY REMARK TO THIS ELECTRONIC LIVING-EUROPE NUMBER In their programme, Mr. François Fillon, Mr. Jean-Luc Mélanchon and Mr. Emmanuel Macron aim at restoring full employment. It is not the case for Mr. Benoît Hamon who justifies the need for a universal basic income by the fact that many jobs will disappear because of digitalisation. In fact, restoring full employment or not in France is still a problem for the future. Given this uncertainty Vivant-Europe believes that the universal basic income considered by Emmanuel Macron as an interesting idea is a prudential financial measure because it allows to avoid pauperisation of society, guarantees minimum purchasing power and does not condemn The unemployed to wait for the possible return of full employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of Freedom from the Socialist Perspectives of the Universal Basic Income แนวคิดเรื่องเสรีภาพจากมุมมองแบบสังคมนิยม ของทฤษฎีรายได้พื้นฐานสากล
    วารสารปณิธาน Concept of Freedom from the Socialist perspectives Of the Universal Basic Income แนวคิดเรื่องเสรีภาพจากมุมมองแบบสังคมนิยม ของทฤษฎีรายได้พื้นฐานสากล Busara Rakphong1 บุศรา รักพงษ์ Abstract “Freedom” has always been a problem in Metaphysics. Humanity has been searching and fighting for it for a long time. It is not certain that freedom really exists. Surprisingly, restriction, as a contradiction of freedom, makes it possibly exist. “We are free,” does not seem to be completed until we state where or what we are free from. There are two main types of freedom: positive and negative freedoms. Positive freedom is freedom to do what one wants to do. Negative freedom is freedom from limitations. Humans are re- ally free when they are both positively and negatively free. Biopolitics and economic limitations are the main freedom 1Master student of Master of Arts in Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University. This paper is a part of the thesis of “Concept of Freedom from the Socialist perspectives Of the Universal Basic Income” which Dr.Christopher Fisher is an advisor and Dr.Phisit Kotsupho is an co-advisor. 134 ปีที่ 13 ฉบับที่ 1 มกราคม - มิถุนายน 2560 Concept of Freedom from the Socialist perspectives Of the Universal Basic Income constraints people are confronted with today. People cannot be really free with these conditions and to unlock them we need to create tools to do so. The Universal Basic Income is a selected tool for unlocking to the real freedom. The result shows that it is possible for the Universal Basic
    [Show full text]
  • The Citizen's Basic Income As an Instrument to Help the Transition to Democracy
    The Citizen’s Basic Income to Build Democracy and Justice Essay presented to NOPOOR Project in Paris, June 12 2012 1 Eduardo Matarazzo Suplicy It is an honor for me to be invited to participate in this Kick-off Meeting of the NOPOOR Project, organized by the Development Institutions & Mondialization, DIAL, and the Institut de Recherche pour le Development, IRD, in Paris June 11th to 13th. It is, undoubtedly, a very relevant opportunity to exchange ideas about the experiences of so many countries, in the five continents, about how we can raise the level of justice in our societies, with freedom, by democratic means, so as to live with a sense of solidarity and peace. As a Brazilian Senator, member of the Workers’ Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores), author of Law 10.835/2004, that institutes a Citizen’s Basic Income to all residents of Brazil, including those foreigners who have lived in Brazil for five years or more, no matter the origin, race, sex, age or socioeconomic condition, and also Co-President of Honor of the Basic Income Earth Network – BIEN – I am happy to bring you information about what is going on in my country, and about the development of this proposal in other parts of the world. According to the law, approved by consensus of all parties, in December 2002 in the Federal Senate, and in December 2003, in the Chamber of Deputies, and then sanctioned by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in January 8th, 2004, the Citizen’s Basic Income will be an annual monetary benefit, equal to all, sufficient to attend the basic needs of each person.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Income on the Agenda: Reflections on the Finnish Basic Income Experiment
    Basic Income on the Agenda: Reflections on the Finnish Basic Income Experiment Presentation prepared for Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, 1 June 2016 1 Jurgen De Wispelaere, University of Tampere [email protected] 2 Basic income attention, 2005-2016 Source: Scott Santens, Basic Income on the March (Google Trends) 3 Recent policy initiatives !Existing schemes: Alaska PFD, Iran’s oil subsidy grant, … !Legislation: Brazil’s Lei de Renda Bá sica de Cidadania (Law No. 10.835, 2004) and Switzerland’s Basic Income Referendum on 5 June 2016 !Pilot projects, past and planned: !1970s: NIT experiments (US), Mincome (Canada) !Experiments in Otjivero-Omitara (Namibia, 2008-2009), Quatinga Velho (Brazil, 2008-), Madhya Pradesh (India, 2011) !Planned experiments include Netherlands (Utrecht, Tilburg, Groningen, Wageningen), Kenya (GiveDirectly, 10-15y trial), Bay Area, US (Ycombinator), Finland (2017-2019). 4 Why basic income pilots now? ! Background context of 2008 financial crisis and its reaction: austerity, poverty and economic inequality … ! Growth of evidence-based policy-making ! Attention-grabbing events: e.g. Switzerland (2013), Finland/ Netherlands (2015), Kenya (2016) ! Media attention promotes policy attention ! Policy learning from examples around the world? ! Exponential increase in organised basic income movement ! Basic income pilots are a political compromise between doing nothing and implementing a novel policy idea 5 Why conduct a basic income pilot? !Scientific field experiment: examining actual behaviour/impact
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Basic Income with Unemployment Benefits”, IZA Dp
    A Basic Income Can Raise Employment and Welfare for a Majority Felix FitzRoy* Jim Jin** University of St. Andrews June 2015 JEL Classification Numbers: D30, D60, H20, Key Words: basic income, unemployment benefits, welfare Abstract With growing interest in a universal basic income (BI), we provide new results for a majority to benefit from replacing (some) unemployment benefits with BI. Given any income distribution and an extensive margin, such a replacement always benefits those remaining unemployed, raises utilitarian welfare, and benefits a poor - or even a working - majority. Similar results follow with involuntary unemployment, and joint distributions of wages and costs of work. Moreover, using quasi-linear utility with intensive margins, marginal introduction of BI can still benefit a large proportion of the poor whose productivities are below the average, without raising unemployment. Acknowledgements: Earlier versions were presented at the Royal Economic Society 2011 Conference, seminars at the Universities of Hamburg-HWWI, Dundee, St Andrews, and at the 15th BIEN Congress, 2014. Among many participants we are especially grateful to Ingrid Hohenleitner, Max Steinhardt, Thomas Straubhaar, Catia Montagna, Hassan Molana, David Ulph, Alan Sutherland, Tatiana Damjanovic, for their valuable comments and suggestions. The authors retain responsibility for errors and omissions. * School of Economics and Finance, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Scotland, UK, Tel. (01334)-462437, e-mail: [email protected] ** Corresponding
    [Show full text]