DOCSLIB.ORG

MINEOLA BIBLE INSTITUTE and SEMINARY Apostolic History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MINEOLA BIBLE INSTITUTE and SEMINARY Apostolic History MINEOLA BIBLE INSTITUTE AND SEMINARY Page | 1 Apostolic History Radically Biblical, Apostolic, Christianity Bishop D.R. Vestal, PhD Larry L Yates, ThD, DMin “Excellence in Apostolic Education” 1 Copyright © 2019 Mineola Bible Institute and Seminary All Rights Reserved Page | 2 This lesson material may not be used in any manner for reproduction in any language or use without the written permission of Mineola Bible Institute and Seminary 2 APOSTOLIC HISTORY OUTLINE Page | 3 Acts 2:38 Doctrine Through The Ages by Rev. MARVIN M. ARNOLD, D.D., Th.D. INTRODUCTION by Rev. Norman Zeno, M.A. DEDICATION This APOSTOLIC HISTORY OUTLINE is dedicated to the Lord Jesus Christ. It is also dedicated to those unknown persons who, through the centuries, kept the biblical tenets that constitute Acts 2:38 alive and utilized. 3 Contents PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 A STORY ABOUT ONE-GOD APOSTOLIC HISTORY ....................................................................................... 7 CERTIFICATION....................................................................................................................................................... 9 GLOSSARY ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 Page | 4 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 AD 33 to 100 THE BIBLICAL CHURCH of ACTS TWO of JERUSALEM Primitive JUDAIC- CHRISTIANITY ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 CATHOLIC CHURCH: AD 100 to 200 .................................................................................................................. 20 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: (The Acts Two Church). AD 100 to 200....................................................................... 22 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 200 to 300 .................................................................................................................... 25 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 200 to 300 ................................................................................................................. 27 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 300 to 400 .................................................................................................................... 29 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 300 to 400 ................................................................................................................. 31 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 400 to 500 .................................................................................................................... 33 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 400 to 500 ................................................................................................................. 36 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 500 to 600 .................................................................................................................... 38 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 500 to 600 ................................................................................................................. 40 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 600 to 700 .................................................................................................................... 42 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 600 to 700 ................................................................................................................. 44 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 700 to 800. ................................................................................................................... 46 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 700 to 800 ................................................................................................................. 48 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 800 to 900 .................................................................................................................... 50 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 800 to 900 ................................................................................................................. 52 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 900 to 1000 .................................................................................................................. 54 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 900 to 1000 ............................................................................................................... 56 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1000 to 1100 ................................................................................................................ 58 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1000 to 1100 ............................................................................................................. 60 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1100 to 1200 ................................................................................................................ 62 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1100 to 1200 ............................................................................................................. 64 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1200 to 1300 ................................................................................................................ 66 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1200 to 1300 ............................................................................................................. 68 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1300 to 1400 ................................................................................................................ 70 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1300 to 1400 ............................................................................................................. 72 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1400 to 1500 ................................................................................................................ 74 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1400 to 1500 ............................................................................................................. 76 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1500 to 1600 ................................................................................................................ 78 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1500 to 1600 ............................................................................................................. 80 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1600 to 1700 ................................................................................................................ 84 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1600 to 1700 ............................................................................................................. 86 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1700 to 1800 ................................................................................................................ 88 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1700 to 1800 ............................................................................................................. 90 4 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1800 to 1900 ................................................................................................................ 92 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1800 to 1900 ............................................................................................................. 94 CATHOLIC SYSTEM: AD 1900 ............................................................................................................................. 96 APOSTOLIC CHURCH: AD 1900 .......................................................................................................................... 98 CONTROVERSY OVER THE CHRIST BAPTISM 1904-1912 ......................................................................... 100 Page | 5 APOSTOLIC ORGANIZATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 102 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................................... 104 5 PREFACE This book asserts that the UPPER ROOM CHURCH of Acts, Jerusalem, AD 33, was alive and doctrinally intact in every century until this moment. It never died-ceased to Page | 6 function-or digressed into something else. Specifically, it never became catholicized. Petrine ecclesiology has always been separate and apart from any nominal religion that would not have or hold Acts two doctrinal tenets. (The Apostles laid down Acts 2:38 ecclesiology.) Thus-it is false to think that Upper Room Christianity digressed to become Catholicism or High Protestantism. Equally, it is so wrong to assume that Martin Luther in his conductual-averagism could RESTORE such a holy ecclesiology as the Apostles laid down! It never needed restoration. Upper Room was always alive. In fact, we find that Luther restored little or nothing. There was no step-by-step restoration of our God's Church. Christ's words in St. Mt. 16:18 never failed! This 0utline assures us that the Biblical Church never died, never became something else, and that it is alive forevermore. 6 A STORY ABOUT ONE-GOD APOSTOLIC HISTORY Our history of the Judaic-Christian Church had origin on the Day of Pentecost, at Page | 7 Jerusalem, in AD 33. We could refer to it as: "History of the Apostolic Church." Some basic and fundamental doctrine laid down by the NT Church constitutes Acts 2: 1-4, 36, 38. This pious doctrine made history, a lengthy and illustrious history! History concerning the Church of Acts two is utterly fascinating and, we shall trace it through the centuries in this Outline. We launched The APOSTOLIC HISTORY OUTLINE with the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Historical Roots of the Death of God"
    Portland State University PDXScholar Special Collections: Oregon Public Speakers Special Collections and University Archives 7-2-1968 "Historical Roots of the Death of God" Thomas J.J. Altizer Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/orspeakers Part of the History of Religion Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Altizer, Thomas J.J., ""Historical Roots of the Death of God"" (1968). Special Collections: Oregon Public Speakers. 57. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/orspeakers/57 This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Collections: Oregon Public Speakers by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Thomas J. J. Altizer "Historical Roots of the Death of God" July 2, 1968 Portland State University PSU Library Special Collections and University Archives Oregon Public Speakers Collection http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/11281 Transcribed by Nia Mayes, November 25, 2020 Audited by Carolee Harrison, February 2021 PSU Library Special Collections and University Archives presents these recordings as part of the historical record. They reflect the recollections and opinions of the individual speakers and are not intended to be representative of the views of Portland State University. They may contain language, ideas, or stereotypes that are offensive to others. MICHAEL REARDON: We’re very fortunate today to have Dr. Altizer, who is teaching on the summer faculty at Oregon State in the department of religion there, give the first in a series of two lectures.
    [Show full text]
  • Sermon Notes: June 7, 2020 Focus: Trinity Sunday Lectionary Readings Trinitarian Images Are Everywhere in Our Liturgy
    Sermon Notes: June 7, 2020 Focus: Trinity Sunday Lectionary Readings Trinitarian images are everywhere in our liturgy. At the same time, there are many Christian groups who reject the Trinity. Pentecostal churches (Church of God, independent Pentecostals); Jehovah’s Witness; Mormons and denominations that you’ve never heard of don’t believe “In the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.” If you forget most of this sermon, just remember that Trinity is a relationship. I want to get into some theology; but my primary goal is to give you a reason to care about the Trinity or to know why you don’t care. There are lots of small pieces that one could use to cobble together a scriptural understanding of the Trinity. This is found especially in the beginning of Genesis and when people get baptized. The most explicit verse is at the end of Matthew. Therefore, go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. There is also a reference in 1st John - For there are three that testify: the Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement. It’s a stretch to build the Trinity upon these and other oblique references, but that is exactly what the church in history has tried to do. Here are some historical “heresies” around the Trinity. I am willing to bet that one of them is your favorite. Sabellianism, Noetianism and Patripassianism Trinity is expressed in Could not find an image reference, but it leans to modal and tritheistic sensibility different “modes.” Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not distinct, but rather different faces God.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate
    The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate by David Andrew Graham A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Wycliffe College and the Theological Department of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College © Copyright by David Andrew Graham 2013 The Christological Function of Divine Impassibility: Cyril of Alexandria and Contemporary Debate David Andrew Graham Master of Arts in Theology University of St. Michael’s College 2013 Abstract This thesis contributes to the debate over the meaning and function of the doctrine of divine impassibility in theological and especially christological discourse. Seeking to establish the coherence and utility of the paradoxical language characteristic of the received christological tradition (e.g. the impassible Word became passible flesh and suffered impassibly), it argues that the doctrine of divine apatheia illuminates the apocalyptic and soteriological dimension of the incarnate Son’s passible life more effectively than recent reactions against it. The first chapter explores the Christology of Cyril of Alexandria and the meaning and place of apatheia within it. In light of the christological tradition which Cyril epitomized, the second chapter engages contemporary critiques and re-appropriations of impassibility, focusing on the particular contributions of Jürgen Moltmann, Robert W. Jenson, Bruce L. McCormack and David Bentley Hart. ii Acknowledgments If this thesis communicates any truth, beauty and goodness, credit belongs to all those who have shaped my life up to this point. In particular, I would like to thank the Toronto School of Theology and Wycliffe College for providing space to do theology from within the catholic church.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Bosphorus: the Holy Land in English Reformation Literature, 1516-1596
    BEYOND THE BOSPHORUS: THE HOLY LAND IN ENGLISH REFORMATION LITERATURE, 1516-1596 Jerrod Nathan Rosenbaum A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English and Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Jessica Wolfe Patrick O’Neill Mary Floyd-Wilson Reid Barbour Megan Matchinske ©2019 Jerrod Nathan Rosenbaum ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Jerrod Rosenbaum: Beyond the Bosphorus: The Holy Land in English Reformation Literature, 1516-1596 (Under the direction of Jessica Wolfe) This dissertation examines the concept of the Holy Land, for purposes of Reformation polemics and apologetics, in sixteenth-century English Literature. The dissertation focuses on two central texts that are indicative of two distinct historical moments of the Protestant Reformation in England. Thomas More's Utopia was first published in Latin at Louvain in 1516, roughly one year before the publication of Martin Luther's Ninety-Five Theses signaled the commencement of the Reformation on the Continent and roughly a decade before the Henrician Reformation in England. As a humanist text, Utopia contains themes pertinent to internal Church reform, while simultaneously warning polemicists and ecclesiastics to leave off their paltry squabbles over non-essential religious matters, lest the unity of the Church catholic be imperiled. More's engagement with the Holy Land is influenced by contemporary researches into the languages of that region, most notably the search for the original and perfect language spoken before the episode at Babel. As the confusion of tongues at Babel functions etiologically to account for the origin of all ideological conflict, it was thought that the rediscovery of the prima lingua might resolve all conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the Trinity in the Theology of Jürgen Moltmann
    Our Cries in His Cry: Suffering and The Crucified God By Mick Stringer A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Theology The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia 2002 Contents Abstract................................................................................................................ iii Declaration of Authorship ................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements.............................................................................................. v Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1 1 Moltmann in Context: Biographical and Methodological Issues................... 9 Biographical Issues ..................................................................................... 10 Contextual Issues ........................................................................................ 13 Theological Method .................................................................................... 15 2 The Trinity and The Crucified God................................................................ 23 The Tradition............................................................................................... 25 Divine Suffering.......................................................................................... 29 The Rise of a ‘New Orthodoxy’.................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Christendom, Post-Constantinian, Post-Christian…Does the Label Matter?
    Post-Christendom, Post-Constantinian, Post-Christian…does the label matter? Post-Christendom The term ‘post-Christendom’ has become increasingly familiar in conversations about church and mission in contemporary western societies. Some first encountered this term in the ‘After Christendom’ series, published by Paternoster and written by members of the Anabaptist Network since 2004. 1 These books offer resources to help us understand and engage creatively with the challenges and opportunities of post-Christendom culture. But many others are also using this language, and have done so for many years, even if its significance has not been widely recognised until quite recently. ‘Post-Christendom’ appears to be a significant lens through which to view the emerging cultural landscape. However, different people use the term ‘post-Christendom’ in different ways. Sometimes this helps us engage with the issues we face; but sometimes it simply causes confusion. In the emerging church conversation, for instance, ‘post-Christendom’ is often used as if it were a synonym for post-modernity. Understanding and engaging with post-modernity is undoubtedly important, but referring to this as ‘post-Christendom’ does not aid clarity of thinking. The transition from modernity to post-modernity and from Christendom to post- Christendom confronts us with a cultural and missional ‘double whammy’. These shifts overlap, complement and reinforce each other in various ways, so we do need to explore their inter-relationship and dual impact. But post-Christendom is not the same as post- modernity. Post-Christendom presents different challenges and opportunities. The first book in the ‘After Christendom’ series offered a definition of post-Christendom: the culture that emerges as the Christian faith loses coherence within a society that has been definitively shaped by the Christian story and as the institutions that have been developed to express Christian convictions decline in influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia Theological Quarterly
    Concordia Theological Quarterly Volume 76:1-2 Januaryj April 2012 Table of Contents What Would Bach Do Today? Paul J. Grilne ........................................................................................... 3 Standing on the Brink of the J01'dan: Eschatological Intention in Deute1'onomy Geoffrey R. Boyle .................................................................................. 19 Ch1'ist's Coming and the ChUl'ch's Mission in 1 Thessalonians Charles A. Gieschen ............................................................................. 37 Luke and the Foundations of the Chu1'ch Pete1' J. Scaer .......................................................................................... 57 The Refonnation and the Invention of History Korey D. Maas ...................................................................................... 73 The Divine Game: Faith and the Reconciliation of Opposites in Luthe1"s Lectures on Genesis S.J. Munson ............................................................................................ 89 Fides Heroica? Luthe1" s P1'aye1' fo1' Melanchthon's Recovery f1'om Illness in 1540 Albert B. Collver III ............................................................................ 117 The Quest fo1' Luthe1'an Identity in the Russian Empire Darius Petkiinas .................................................................................. 129 The Theology of Stanley Hauerwas Joel D. Lehenbauer ............................................................................. 157 Theological Observer
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the Cross: the Theology and Social Ethics of John Howard Yoder
    3377 Bayview Avenue TEL: Toronto, ON 416.226.6620 TYNDALE M2M 3S4 www.tyndale.ca UNIVERSITY Note: This Work has been made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws of Canada without the written authority from the copyright owner. Carter, Craig A. The Politics of the Cross: The Theology and Social Ethics of John Howard Yoder. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Brazos Press, 2001. The Politics of THE Cross The Theology and Social Ethics of John Howard Yoder Craig A. Carter Brazos Press A Division of Baker Book House Co Grand Rapids, Michigan 49516 © 2001 by Craig A. Carter Published by Brazos Press a division of Baker Book House Company P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287 Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval sys­ tem, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Scripture is taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. NIV®. Copy­ right © 1973,1978,1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. Scripture marked as “Phillips” is taken from The New Testament in Modern English. Copy­ right © by J. B. Philips 1996. Used by permission of Touchstone/Simon & Schuster, Inc. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carter, Craig A.
    [Show full text]
  • RCIA, Session #06: Major Heresies of the Early Church
    RCIA, Session #06: Major Heresies of the Early Church Adoptionism A 2nd-3rd century heresy that affirmed that Jesus’ divine identity began with his baptism (God adopted the man Jesus to be his Son, making him divine through the gift of the Holy Spirit). It was advocated by Elipandus of Toledo and Felix of Urgel, but condemned by Pope Adrian I in 785 and again in 794. When Peter Abelard (1079-1142) renewed a modified form of this teaching in the twelfth century, it was condemned by Pope Alexander III in 1177 as a theory proposed by Peter Lombard. Apollinarianism Heretical doctrine of Appolinaris the younger (310-90), Bishop of Laodicea, that Christ had a human body and only a sensitive soul, but had not rational mind or a free human will (i.e., Jesus was not fully human). His rational soul was replaced by the Divine Logos, or Word of God. The theory was condemned by Roman councils in 377 and 381, and also by the 1st Council of Constantinople in 381. Arianism A fourth century heresy that denied the divinity of Jesus Christ. Its author was Arius (256-336), a priest of Alexandria who in 318 began to teach the doctrine that now bears his name. According to Arius, there are not three distinct persons in God, co-eternal and equal in all things, but only one person, the Father. The Son is only a creature, made out of nothing, like all other created beings. He may be called God by only by an extension of language, as the first and greatest person chosen to be divine intermediary in the creation and redemption of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Irenaeus Shed Considerable Light on the Place of Pentecostal Thought for Histories That Seek to Be International and Ecumenical
    Orphans or Widows? Seeing Through A Glass Darkly By Dr. Harold D. Hunter Abstract Scholars seeking to map the antecedents of Pentecostal distinctives in early Christendom turn to standard reference works expecting to find objective summaries of the writings of Church Fathers and Mothers. Apparently dismissing the diversity of the biblical canon itself, the writers of these reference works can be found manipulating patristic texts in ways which reinforce the notion that the Classical Pentecostal Movement is a historical aberration. This prejudice is evident in the selection of texts and how they are translated and indexed as well as the surgical removal of pertinent sections of the original texts. This problem can be set right only by extensive reading of the original sources in the original languages. The writings of Irenaeus shed considerable light on the place of Pentecostal thought for histories that seek to be international and ecumenical. Introduction I began advanced study of classical Pentecostal distinctives at Fuller Theological Seminary in the early 1970s. Among those offering good advice was the then academic dean of Vanguard University in nearby Costa Mesa, California, Russell P. Spittler. While working on a patristic project, Spittler emphasized the need for me to engage J. Quasten and like scholars. More recently I utilized Quasten et al in dialogue with William Henn in a paper presented to the International Roman Catholic - Pentecostal Dialogue which convened July 23-29, 1999 in Venice, Italy. What follows is the substance of the paper delivered at that meeting.i The most influential editions of Church Fathers and Mothers available in the 20th Century suffered from inadequate translation of key passages.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Heresy Description Origin Official
    Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Official Heresy Description Origin Other Condemnation Adoptionism Belief that Jesus Propounded Theodotus was Alternative was born as a by Theodotus of excommunicated names: Psilanthro mere (non-divine) Byzantium , a by Pope Victor and pism and Dynamic man, was leather merchant, Paul was Monarchianism. [9] supremely in Rome c.190, condemned by the Later criticized as virtuous and that later revived Synod of Antioch presupposing he was adopted by Paul of in 268 Nestorianism (see later as "Son of Samosata below) God" by the descent of the Spirit on him. Apollinarism Belief proposed Declared to be . that Jesus had by Apollinaris of a heresy in 381 by a human body Laodicea (died the First Council of and lower soul 390) Constantinople (the seat of the emotions) but a divine mind. Apollinaris further taught that the souls of men were propagated by other souls, as well as their bodies. Arianism Denial of the true The doctrine is Arius was first All forms denied divinity of Jesus associated pronounced that Jesus Christ Christ taking with Arius (ca. AD a heretic at is "consubstantial various specific 250––336) who the First Council of with the Father" forms, but all lived and taught Nicea , he was but proposed agreed that Jesus in Alexandria, later exonerated either "similar in Christ was Egypt . as a result of substance", or created by the imperial pressure "similar", or Father, that he and finally "dissimilar" as the had a beginning declared a heretic correct alternative. in time, and that after his death. the title "Son of The heresy was God" was a finally resolved in courtesy one.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Rapture Thomas D
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Liberty University Digital Commons Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Article Archives Pre-Trib Research Center May 2009 A Brief History of the Rapture Thomas D. Ice Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch Recommended Citation Ice, Thomas D., "A Brief History of the Rapture" (2009). Article Archives. Paper 4. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pre-Trib Research Center at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Article Archives by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE RAPTURE Tom’s Perspectives by Thomas Ice One of the most often cited objections to pretribulationism is that it is a new teaching in church history having only come on the scene in the 1830s. It is often argued that if the pre-trib rapture were biblical then it would have been taught earlier and throughout church history. In the last decade, individuals have found a number of pre-1830 references to a pre-trib rapture. Here is a summary of that evidence. THE EARLY CHURCH Since imminency is considered to be a crucial feature of pretribulationism by scholars such as John Walvoord,1 it is significant that the Apostolic Fathers, though posttribulational, at the same time just as clearly taught the pretribulational feature of imminence. Since it was common in the early church to hold contradictory positions without even an awareness of inconsistency, it would not be surprising to learn that their era supports both views.
    [Show full text]