DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 8 Glaciers and the Landscape

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Section 8 Glaciers and the Landscape Section 8 Glaciers and the Landscape What Do You See? Soils that contain many rocks and large boulders may be expensive to dig out for development. Learning Outcomes Think About It In this section, you will Glaciers are huge masses of ice that move very slowly across the • Make a mathematical model land, changing the land’s shape as they move along. In Alaska, of an imaginary glacier. the largest glacier is the Tazlina Glacier. It is approximately • Calculate how the glacier 40 km long. Scientists who study glaciers think about questions would respond to hypothetical changes in climate. like the following: • Understand the uses and • What other materials might be in a glacier besides ice? limitations of models in Earth and space science. • How might the materials get into the glacier? • Understand the mechanics of how glaciers form and move. • How do glaciers change the landscape? • Discover that glaciers modify Record your ideas about these questions in your Geo log. Be the landscape by erosion and prepared to discuss your responses with your small group deposition. and the class. • Model the action of glacial meltwater as it drains out of a glacier. Investigate • Establish that the movement of glaciers can change stream In this Investigate, you will calculate the movement of a drainage patterns. hypothetical glacier. This will help you to gain an understanding • Model the effects of a glacier of the factors that affect the shape and movement of a glacier. You infringing on a stream. will also examine models that show the action of glaciers as they • Apply what you have observed move over land. Your teacher may run some or all parts of this to determine whether glaciers have affected your community Investigate as a demonstration for the class. in the past. 449 EarthComm EC_Natl_SE_C4.indd 449 7/12/11 9:55:16 AM Chapter 4 Surface Processes Part A: Modeling the Behavior profiles and note that the X has moved of a Glacier forward the same distance as was lost 1. In this part of the Investigate, as a to the head of the glacier). glacial geologist, you are monitoring a a) How much ice is melting each year glacier in Alaska. Assume the following from this glacier? (If the glacier about your glacier: is at equilibrium, the volume of • It is 100 km long, 5 km wide, and ice melted equals the distance of 200 m thick. glacier movement per year, times • It moves at a rate of 100 m/yr. (Note: the thickness of the glacier, times This does not mean that the glacier the width of the glacier.) gets longer by 100 m each year, but 3. To be at equilibrium, the glacier must rather that any one point in the glacier receive as much new ice each year as moves forward 100 m in a year, as it loses by melting. A lot of snow that shown in the sample profiles below.) falls on a glacier simply melts and runs • It is at equilibrium. (Note: This means off without contributing anything to the that it is receiving just enough snow glacier, especially in the warmer areas to balance what it loses through near the foot of the glacier. Assume that melting. At equilibrium, the length new ice is added only in the upper half and thickness of the glacier remain (50 km) of the glacier. about the same.) a) What volume of ice is needed to balance losses by melting? b) What thickness (depth) of ice has to be added each year to balance the melting? (Remember that the volume of ice is equal to flow per year × depth × width.) 4. On average, 1 m of snow packs down into about 10 cm of ice. a) How much snow would have to fall on the glacier each year to create the thickness of new ice that you calculated above? b) Data show that there is 7.2 m of a) How long would it take a rock that snowfall in the region in which the falls into the ice at the head of the glacier is located. Is the amount of glacier to reach the foot? (Remember snowfall required to keep the glacier that the flow rate of the glacier is in balance realistic? 100 m/yr and that the rock must travel the entire length of the glacier.) 5. Imagine that the climate in the region of the glacier changes in such a way 2. The glacier moves at a speed of that the winter snowfall is greater by a 100 m/yr. If no ice were melting from factor of two (that is, it doubles) and the glacier, it would be 100 m longer the melting rate is less by a factor of after one year. However, it was assumed two (that is, it is cut in half). that the glacier maintains a constant size. Therefore, a volume of ice must a) How much larger will the total volume be melting each year (see the sample of the glacier be after 100 years? 450 EarthComm EC_Natl_SE_C4.indd 450 7/12/11 9:55:17 AM Section 8 Glaciers and the Landscape b) What will be the percentage increase a) Describe the characteristics of in the size of the glacier? (To compute the glacier. this, subtract the original volume b) What processes might supply of the glacier from the new volume, sediment to the surface of the glacier? divide by the length of the time interval in years, and multiply by c) Describe the characteristics of the 100 to convert to a percentage.) valley-floor materials. 6. Imagine that the climate in the region of d) What processes might affect the the glacier changes in such a way that development of the valley floor? the winter snowfall is less by a factor of 2. Think about how constructive and two and the melting rate increases by a destructive surface processes affect the factor of two. landscape. Predict the following: a) How many years would it take for a) What will happen if the glacier the glacier to disappear (that is, to advances by growing larger? melt completely)? b) What will happen if the glacier Part B: Glacial Processes retreats by melting? 1. Glacial ice can grow thousands of c) Make a table with two columns meters thick and extend tens to and two rows. Label the columns hundreds of kilometers. Due to their “erosion” and “deposition.” Label the size, glaciers can have a great impact rows “processes” and “landforms.” on the landscape. You will run a model 3. You will model the movement of a that examines the destructive and valley glacier. Run the model by pressing constructive effects of a valley glacier, a the ice down into the sediments and glacier that is confined to a valley and slowly slide the ice forward so that it flows from a higher elevation to a lower advances along the valley floor. elevation. Valley glaciers are found in mountain landscapes. Work with your a) Record your observations under the group to set up your model according appropriate heading in your table. to the following diagram. Look for changes all around the glacier, including underneath. b) Compare your predictions to your results. Explain any differences. 4. You will now observe what happens when the glacier retreats by melting. a) Make another table for recording your observations. b) Predict what you will observe as the glacier retreats. 5. Run the model by letting the ice melt and record your observations. a) Compare your predictions to your results. Explain any differences. b) Discuss with your class how glaciers change the landscape. 451 EarthComm EC_Natl_SE_C4.indd 451 7/12/11 9:55:17 AM Chapter 4 Surface Processes Part C: Modeling the Action of 6. Put the pan on a surface where water Glacial Meltwater can drain from the pan without causing any damage. Prop up the end of the pan Wear goggles and a lab apron throughout this investigation. Use the hammer with care. Clean opposite the opening with a thin strip up spills. Wash your hands when you are done. of wood about 3 cm thick, or a chalkboard eraser. 1. Put an even layer of cedar bedding about 1 to 2 cm thick in the bottom of a baking pan. Put a second pan inside the pan with cedar bedding. Spread an even layer of fine sand about 0.6 cm thick on the bottom of the second baking pan. Fill the baking pan until it is almost full of water. Put the assembly into a freezer, and wait overnight until the water is a solid block of ice. Note: It will take a long time for the water to freeze all the way to the bottom because of the insulation of the cedar bedding. 2. Turn the pan upside down under warm running water until the ice block comes loose. Set the ice block aside, and cut down along two edges of the pan so that one of the narrow sides of the pan can be bent down flat, level with the bottom of the pan. 3. Replace the ice block in the pan, and wait until the block is at its melting temperature. You will know when the block has reached its melting temperature when its surface shines with a thin film of water. 4. Put the pan on the floor, place a wooden block on the ice surface, 7. Spray cold water on the upper end of and hit the board with blows from a the ice sheet.
Recommended publications
  • Impact of Climate Change in Kalabaland Glacier from 2000 to 2013 S

    Impact of Climate Change in Kalabaland Glacier from 2000 to 2013 S

    The Asian Review of Civil Engineering ISSN: 2249 - 6203 Vol. 3 No. 1, 2014, pp. 8-13 © The Research Publication, www.trp.org.in Impact of Climate Change in Kalabaland Glacier from 2000 to 2013 S. Rahul Singh1 and Renu Dhir2 1Reaserch Scholar, 2Associate Professor, Department of CSE, NIT, Jalandhar - 144 011, Pubjab, India E-mail: [email protected] (Received on 16 March 2014 and accepted on 26 June 2014) Abstract - Glaciers are the coolers of the planet earth and the of the clearest indicators of alterations in regional climate, lifeline of many of the world’s major rivers. They contain since they are governed by changes in accumulation (from about 75% of the Earth’s fresh water and are a source of major snowfall) and ablation (by melting of ice). The difference rivers. The interaction between glaciers and climate represents between accumulation and ablation or the mass balance a particularly sensitive approach. On the global scale, air is crucial to the health of a glacier. GSI (op cit) has given temperature is considered to be the most important factor details about Gangotri, Bandarpunch, Jaundar Bamak, Jhajju reflecting glacier retreat, but this has not been demonstrated Bamak, Tilku, Chipa ,Sara Umga Gangstang, Tingal Goh for tropical glaciers. Mass balance studies of glaciers indicate Panchi nala I , Dokriani, Chaurabari and other glaciers of that the contributions of all mountain glaciers to rising sea Himalaya. Raina and Srivastava (2008) in their ‘Glacial Atlas level during the last century to be 0.2 to 0.4 mm/yr. Global mean temperature has risen by just over 0.60 C over the last of India’ have documented various aspects of the Himalayan century with accelerated warming in the last 10-15 years.
  • Protecting the Crown: a Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park

    Protecting the Crown: a Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park

    Protecting the Crown A Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (RM-CESU) RM-CESU Cooperative Agreement H2380040001 (WASO) RM-CESU Task Agreement J1434080053 Theodore Catton, Principal Investigator University of Montana Department of History Missoula, Montana 59812 Diane Krahe, Researcher University of Montana Department of History Missoula, Montana 59812 Deirdre K. Shaw NPS Key Official and Curator Glacier National Park West Glacier, Montana 59936 June 2011 Table of Contents List of Maps and Photographs v Introduction: Protecting the Crown 1 Chapter 1: A Homeland and a Frontier 5 Chapter 2: A Reservoir of Nature 23 Chapter 3: A Complete Sanctuary 57 Chapter 4: A Vignette of Primitive America 103 Chapter 5: A Sustainable Ecosystem 179 Conclusion: Preserving Different Natures 245 Bibliography 249 Index 261 List of Maps and Photographs MAPS Glacier National Park 22 Threats to Glacier National Park 168 PHOTOGRAPHS Cover - hikers going to Grinnell Glacier, 1930s, HPC 001581 Introduction – Three buses on Going-to-the-Sun Road, 1937, GNPA 11829 1 1.1 Two Cultural Legacies – McDonald family, GNPA 64 5 1.2 Indian Use and Occupancy – unidentified couple by lake, GNPA 24 7 1.3 Scientific Exploration – George B. Grinnell, Web 12 1.4 New Forms of Resource Use – group with stringer of fish, GNPA 551 14 2.1 A Foundation in Law – ranger at check station, GNPA 2874 23 2.2 An Emphasis on Law Enforcement – two park employees on hotel porch, 1915 HPC 001037 25 2.3 Stocking the Park – men with dead mountain lions, GNPA 9199 31 2.4 Balancing Preservation and Use – road-building contractors, 1924, GNPA 304 40 2.5 Forest Protection – Half Moon Fire, 1929, GNPA 11818 45 2.6 Properties on Lake McDonald – cabin in Apgar, Web 54 3.1 A Background of Construction – gas shovel, GTSR, 1937, GNPA 11647 57 3.2 Wildlife Studies in the 1930s – George M.
  • Terminal Zone Glacial Sediment Transfer at a Temperate Overdeepened Glacier System Swift, D

    Terminal Zone Glacial Sediment Transfer at a Temperate Overdeepened Glacier System Swift, D

    University of Dundee Terminal zone glacial sediment transfer at a temperate overdeepened glacier system Swift, D. A.; Cook, S. J.; Graham, D. J.; Midgley, N. G.; Fallick, A. E.; Storrar, R. Published in: Quaternary Science Reviews DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.11.027 Publication date: 2018 Licence: CC BY-NC-ND Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Swift, D. A., Cook, S. J., Graham, D. J., Midgley, N. G., Fallick, A. E., Storrar, R., Toubes Rodrigo, M., & Evans, D. J. A. (2018). Terminal zone glacial sediment transfer at a temperate overdeepened glacier system. Quaternary Science Reviews, 180, 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.11.027 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 Quaternary Science Reviews 180 (2018) 111e131 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Terminal zone glacial sediment transfer at a temperate overdeepened glacier system * D.A.
  • The Impact of Glacier Geometry on Meltwater Plume Structure and Submarine Melt in Greenland Fjords

    The Impact of Glacier Geometry on Meltwater Plume Structure and Submarine Melt in Greenland Fjords

    PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER The impact of glacier geometry on meltwater 10.1002/2016GL070170 plume structure and submarine melt Key Points: in Greenland fjords • We simulate subglacial plumes and submarine melt in 12 Greenland fjords D. Carroll1, D. A. Sutherland1, B. Hudson2, T. Moon1,3, G. A. Catania4,5, E. L. Shroyer6, J. D. Nash6, spanning grounding line depths from 4,5 4,5 7 8 8 100 to 850 m T. C. Bartholomaus , D. Felikson , L. A. Stearns , B. P. Y. Noël , and M. R. van den Broeke • Deep glaciers produce warm, salty 1 2 subsurface plumes that undercut ice; Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of shallow glaciers drive cold, fresh Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, 3Bristol Glaciology Centre, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, surface plumes that can overcut Bristol, UK, 4Institute for Geophysics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA, 5Department of Geology, University of Texas, • Plumes in cold, shallow fjords can Austin, Texas, USA, 6College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, induce comparable depth-averaged 7 8 melt rates to warm, deep fjords due to Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research sustained upwelling velocities Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands Supporting Information: Abstract Meltwater from the Greenland Ice Sheet often drains subglacially into fjords, driving upwelling • Supporting Information S1 plumes at glacier termini. Ocean models and observations of submarine termini suggest that plumes Correspondence to: enhance melt and undercutting, leading to calving and potential glacier destabilization.
  • Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies

    Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies

    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter
  • S1 Processing of Terminus Positions Many of the Published Sources

    S1 Processing of Terminus Positions Many of the Published Sources

    S1 Processing of terminus positions Many of the published sources (Table S1) have taken care to account for seasonality in terminus position by, for example, sampling at the same time each year, but we do not think this is a hugely important consideration because the long-term changes we are interested in are far larger than the seasonal variability at a given glacier. When we had to convert terminus 5 traces to terminus position (e.g. for the NSIDC positions) we used the bow method (Bjork et al., 2012). Many glaciers have a terminus position dataset coming from more than one source. In these cases we remove or merge the datasets according to the procedure summarized in Figure S1. Where a dataset has a shorter time period and a lower or similar sampling frequency compared to another dataset, the former dataset is removed. For example, the Carr et al. (2017) and Bunce et al. (2018) datasets are removed in favor of the Cowton et al. (2018) dataset for Helheim glacier (Figure S2). 10 We merge two datasets when a longer record can be made by combining the two. The datasets are merged by calculating an offset during the overlapping period, and then shifting one of the datasets to make a continuous record. The final terminus position record for Helheim thus consists of a merged form of the Andresen et al. (2012), Cowton et al. (2018) and Joughin et al. records (Figure S2). Lastly, glaciers that are known to have a permanent ice shelf/tongue (Petermann, Ryder, 79N), or to surge (Storstrommen) are removed from the dataset.
  • Seafloor Geomorphology of Western Antarctic Peninsula Bays

    Seafloor Geomorphology of Western Antarctic Peninsula Bays

    The Cryosphere, 12, 205–225, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-205-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Seafloor geomorphology of western Antarctic Peninsula bays: a signature of ice flow behaviour Yuribia P. Munoz and Julia S. Wellner Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA Correspondence: Yuribia P. Munoz ([email protected]) Received: 12 June 2017 – Discussion started: 22 June 2017 Revised: 4 November 2017 – Accepted: 13 November 2017 – Published: 22 January 2018 Abstract. Glacial geomorphology is used in Antarctica to 1 Introduction reconstruct ice advance during the Last Glacial Maximum and subsequent retreat across the continental shelf. Analo- While warming temperatures in the Antarctic Peninsula (AP) gous geomorphic assemblages are found in glaciated fjords have resulted in the retreat of 90 % of the regional glaciers and are used to interpret the glacial history and glacial dy- (Cook et al., 2014) and the collapse of ice shelves (Morris namics in those areas. In addition, understanding the distri- and Vaughan, 2003; Cook and Vaughan, 2010), recent stud- bution of submarine landforms in bays and the local con- ies have shown that since the late 1990s this region is cur- trols exerted on ice flow can help improve numerical models rently experiencing a cooling trend (Turner et al., 2016). The by providing constraints through these drainage areas. We AP is a dynamic region that serves as a natural laboratory present multibeam swath bathymetry from several bays in to study ice flow and the resulting sediment deposits.
  • Seafloor Geomorphology of Western Antarctic Peninsula Bays: a Signature of Ice Flow Behaviour Yuribia P

    Seafloor Geomorphology of Western Antarctic Peninsula Bays: a Signature of Ice Flow Behaviour Yuribia P

    Seafloor geomorphology of western Antarctic Peninsula bays: a signature of ice flow behaviour Yuribia P. Munoz1, Julia S. Wellner1 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204 USA 5 Correspondence to: Y.P. Munoz ([email protected]) Abstract. Glacial geomorphology is used in Antarctica to reconstruct ice advance during the Last Glacial Maximum and subsequent retreat across the continental shelf. Analogous geomorphic assemblages are found in glaciated fjords and are used to interpret the glacial history and glacial dynamics in those areas. In addition, understanding the distribution of 10 submarine landforms in bays and the local controls exerted on ice flow can help improve numerical models by providing constraints through these drainage areas. We present multibeam swath bathymetry from several bays in the South Shetland Islands and the western Antarctic Peninsula. The submarine landforms are described and interpreted in detail. A schematic model was developed showing the features found in the bays; from glacial lineations and moraines in the inner bay, to grounding zone wedges and drumlinoid features in the middle bay, and streamlined features and meltwater channels in the 15 outer bay areas. In addition, we analysed local variables in the bays and observe that: 1) the number of landforms found in the bays scales to the size of the bay, however the geometry of the bays dictates the types of features that form, specifically, we observe a correlation between the bay width and the number of transverse features present in the bays; 2) the smaller seafloor features are present only in the smaller glacial systems indicating that short-lived atmospheric and oceanographic fluctuations, responsible for the formation of these landforms, are only recorded in these smaller systems; and 3) meltwater 20 channels are abundant on the seafloor, however some are subglacial, carved in bedrock, and some are modern erosional features, carved on soft sediment.
  • The Impact of Glacier Geometry on Meltwater Plume Structure and Submarine Melt in Greenland Fjords

    The Impact of Glacier Geometry on Meltwater Plume Structure and Submarine Melt in Greenland Fjords

    PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER The impact of glacier geometry on meltwater 10.1002/2016GL070170 plume structure and submarine melt Key Points: in Greenland fjords • We simulate subglacial plumes and submarine melt in 12 Greenland fjords D. Carroll1, D. A. Sutherland1, B. Hudson2, T. Moon1,3, G. A. Catania4,5, E. L. Shroyer6, J. D. Nash6, spanning grounding line depths from 4,5 4,5 7 8 8 100 to 850 m T. C. Bartholomaus , D. Felikson , L. A. Stearns , B. P. Y. Noël , and M. R. van den Broeke • Deep glaciers produce warm, salty 1 2 subsurface plumes that undercut ice; Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of shallow glaciers drive cold, fresh Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, 3Bristol Glaciology Centre, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, surface plumes that can overcut Bristol, UK, 4Institute for Geophysics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA, 5Department of Geology, University of Texas, • Plumes in cold, shallow fjords can Austin, Texas, USA, 6College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, induce comparable depth-averaged 7 8 melt rates to warm, deep fjords due to Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research sustained upwelling velocities Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands Supporting Information: Abstract Meltwater from the Greenland Ice Sheet often drains subglacially into fjords, driving upwelling • Supporting Information S1 plumes at glacier termini. Ocean models and observations of submarine termini suggest that plumes Correspondence to: enhance melt and undercutting, leading to calving and potential glacier destabilization.
  • Field Mapping Glacier Extents at Mount Rainier for Hazard Recognition

    Field Mapping Glacier Extents at Mount Rainier for Hazard Recognition

    Field Mapping Glacier Extents at Mount Rainier for Hazard Recognition Steve Wilson1, Andrew Fountain1 Portland State University, Department of Geology, Portland, OR Introduction The goal of this report is to describe the role glaciers play in the local and regional hydrology and the impact they may have on the environment and infrastructure of Mount Rainier National Park. Methods included field verification of the spatial extent of debris-covered ice, observing the velocity of debris-covered ice using both field techniques as well as remote sensing techniques, and estimating volume change of glacier ice using airborne LiDAR digital elevation models. Background Mount Rainier is a 4,395 m high stratovolcano that supports the largest concentration of glacier ice in the United States exclusive of Alaska (Krimmel, 2002). There are 143 glaciers and permanent snowfields on Mount Rainier with a total area of 83.3 km2, 27 of these are named glaciers (82.1 km2) (Nylen, 2004). With glacier ice spanning from the summit down to 1,075 m, Mount Rainier is home to the largest glacier (Emmons Glacier, 11.2 km2), the longest glacier (Carbon Glacier, 8.2 km), and the lowest glacier terminus (Carbon Glacier, 1,070 m) in the coterminous United States (Krimmel, 2002). The glaciers on Mount Rainier have a total ice volume of 4.4 km3 (Driedger and Kennard, 1987). Nylen (2004), among others, recognized the importance of quantifying the spatial extent of debris-covered ice as it is a major influence on ablation and can contribute to glaciers extending further down valley than if they were clean.
  • Velocity Increases at Cook Glacier, East Antarctica Linked to Ice Shelf Loss and a Subglacial Flood Event

    Velocity Increases at Cook Glacier, East Antarctica Linked to Ice Shelf Loss and a Subglacial Flood Event

    Velocity increases at Cook Glacier, East Antarctica linked to ice shelf loss and a subglacial flood event Bertie W.J. Miles1*, Chris R. Stokes1, Stewart S.R. Jamieson1 1Department of Geography, Durham University, Science Site, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE 5 Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract: Cook Glacier drains a large proportion of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin in East Antarctica, a region thought to be vulnerable to marine ice sheet instability and with potential to make a significant contribution to sea-level. Despite its importance, there have been very 10 few observations of its longer-term behaviour (e.g. of velocity or changes at its ice front). Here we use a variety of satellite imagery to produce a time-series of ice-front position change from 1947-2017 and ice velocity from 1973-2017. Cook Glacier has two distinct outlets (termed East and West) and we observe the near-complete loss of the Cook West Ice Shelf at some time between 1973 and 1989. This was associated with a doubling of the velocity of Cook West 15 glacier, which may also be linked to previously published reports of inland thinning. The loss of the Cook West Ice Shelf is surprising given that the present-day ocean-climate conditions in the region are not typically associated with catastrophic ice shelf loss. However, we speculate that a more intense ocean-climate forcing in the mid-20th century may have been important in forcing its collapse. Since the loss of the Cook West Ice Shelf, the presence of landfast sea-ice 20 and mélange in the newly formed embayment appears to be important in stabilising the glacier front and enabling periodic advances.
  • The Hydrology of Glacier‐Bed Overdeepenings

    The Hydrology of Glacier‐Bed Overdeepenings

    Received: 25 August 2020 Revised: 25 May 2021 Accepted: 26 May 2021 DOI: 10.1002/esp.5173 RESEARCH ARTICLE The hydrology of glacier-bed overdeepenings: Sediment transport mechanics, drainage system morphology, and geomorphological implications Darrel A. Swift1 | Guy D. Tallentire1,2 | Daniel Farinotti3,4 | Simon J. Cook5,6 | William J. Higson1 | Robert G. Bryant1 1Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Abstract 2Geography and Environment, Loughborough Evacuation of basal sediment by subglacial drainage is an important mediator of rates University, Loughborough, UK of glacial erosion and glacier flow. Glacial erosion patterns can produce closed basins 3Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW), ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (i.e., overdeepenings) in glacier beds, thereby introducing adverse bed gradients that 4Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and are hypothesized to reduce drainage system efficiency and thus favour basal sedi- Landscape Research, WSL, Birmensdorf, ment accumulation. To establish how the presence of a terminal overdeepening Switzerland 5Geography and Environmental Science, might mediate seasonal drainage system evolution and glacial sediment export, we University of Dundee, Dundee, UK measured suspended sediment transport from Findelengletscher, Switzerland during 6 UNESCO Centre for Water Law, Policy and late August and early September 2016. Analyses of these data demonstrate poor Science, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK hydraulic efficiency of drainage pathways in the terminus region but high sediment Correspondence availability. Specifically, the rate of increase of sediment concentration with Darrel A. Swift, Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Winter Street. discharge was found to be significantly lower than that anticipated if channelized Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. flow paths were present.