The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms And 2021 The student’s guide to the leading law firms and sets in the UK e-Edition chambers-student.com Connect with us on cbaK Travers Smith is everything you could want from a law firm. First-rate training and market-leading work alongside some of the City’s finest lawyers. Prestigious clients. The opportunity to progress. And all in a supportive, non-hierarchical and inclusive environment. www.traverssmith.com 10 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2AL +44 (0) 20 7295 3000 The Bar A career at the Bar: a preliminary warning p.631 Pupillage and tenancy p.633 Getting Bar ready p.635 Pupillage applications and interviews p.637 Mini-pupillages p.640 The Inns of Court p.643 The Inns of Court p.645 The civil courts of England and Wales p.646 The Chancery Bar p.647 The Commercial Bar p.649 The Common Law Bar p.650 The Criminal Bar p.651 The Employment Bar p.652 The Family Bar p.654 Public law at the Bar p.656 chambersstudent.co.uk A career at the Bar: a preliminary warning A career at the Bar: a preliminary warning The prestige, the power, the nail-biting courtroom drama, the intellectual tussle, the silly wigs: it’s easy to see how joining this profession is quite so competitive. Landing a pupillage (the Bar’s version of a training con- that in the wake of Covid-19, pupillage numbers are likely tract) is, as one pupil we spoke to put it, “a strenuous and to fall to even lower numbers. difficult process – one that’s not to be underestimated.” In- deed, getting your application noticed in the first place is In an effort to address the imbalance of BPTC graduates a notoriously tough undertaking, given the high volume of to pupillages, the Bar Standards Board raised admission applicants. And if you make it to the interview stage you’ll standards in 2013 by introducing an official aptitude test find that impressing recruiters with your ability to defend for BPTC applicants. This is now compulsory for everyone difficult positions on the spot is no cakewalk either. who wants to do the BPTC and tests logic, deduction and interpretation skills. The necessary pass mark has been “[Landing a pupillage is] a strenuous and raised for 2017 to ensure standards are kept high. The difficult process – one that’s not to be test appears to be helping to reduce the number of no- underestimated.” hopers enrolling on and completing the BPTC, but even if you breeze through the test, the challenges ahead of you Before you dive in head-first, we suggest you take the are far greater. points below on board. We’re certainly not making a case against the Bar here; think of this article as more of a And if you do manage to score a coveted pupillage, it’s ‘proceed with caution’ sign. After all, a good barrister al- worth bearing in mind that tenancies (permanent posi- ways makes sure they’re well versed on both sides of an tions as a fully fledged barrister) are also in shockingly argument. short supply: according to the latest BSB stats there were 502 new ones registered in 2018/19, but this was It’s also worth reminding you that the Bar Standards an outlier year and 300–400 has been the norm over the Board recently announced a new regulatory framework past decade. for wannabe barristers. Different providers now run courses with different names, but the latest stats are These numbers may look dire but one positive to remem- based around the old BPTC. ber is that many individuals taking the Bar Course (some- times over 50%) are overseas students with no intention of practising as barristers in the UK. A student with the The odds drive and conviction that they have what it takes to make The biggest single challenge facing aspiring barristers it at the Bar need not be put off by the statistics above. is the Bar’s oversubscription. Statistics released by the Bar Standards Board show that in 2018/19 there were There’s a common preconception that only 3,031 applicants for the Bar Professional Training Course Oxbridge grads have a shot at the Bar. (BPTC). Of those, 1,753 individuals were enrolled, and as of January 2020 around 70% had passed. Factor in that Your academics there are typically less than 500 pupillages on offer Repeat after us: academic credentials matter at the every year, and that many grads from previous years will Bar. This means high scores from a reputable uni. You still be hunting for jobs, and you’ll realise just how big the may be a mastermind of an advocate, but if you haven’t oversupply of candidates is. At the last count, only around achieved (or, if you’re still studying, aren’t on course for) 43% of BPTC graduates who had enrolled between 2014 top grades, it’s unlikely you’ll be invited to show off your and 2018 had started pupillage. The BSB has also warned skills of persuasion. To be clear, all our research over the years shows that a First or a high 2:1 at undergrad is what you need to get a look-in here. The hard facts There’s a common preconception that only Oxbridge • BPTC enrolments 2018/19: 1,753 grads have a shot at the Bar, and while this is certainly not • Pupillages 2018/19: 568 the case, these two elite establishments are undeniably • Pupillage applicants annually: c. 3,000 happy hunting grounds for chambers. The Bar Standards 631 The Bar A career at the Bar: a preliminary warning chambersstudent.co.uk Board tells us that of pupils who finished the BPTC be- awards in line with NQ salaries at big City firms, and pu- tween 2014 and 2017, 35.6% went to Oxbridge for their pils who gain tenancy at such sets can quickly outstrip undergrad and 38.9% went to another Russell Group uni- their solicitor peers in the income stakes. Some Commer- versity. This doesn’t mean you don’t have a shot if your cial Bar stars earn well over a million a year, and a baby degree comes from elsewhere (after all, one in four pu- junior at a big commercial set can make £120,000 in their pils do), but recognise that the lower your university is first year. in the rankings, the more you’ll need to make up for it by way of stellar grades, worthwhile extracurriculars and However, many barristers work outside this realm. Fees maybe a distinction on an LLM from a better uni. Those earned by those doing publicly funded civil, criminal or who had achieved an outstanding BPTC grade were un- family law have always been low and have taken a fur- surprisingly also more likely to have commenced pupil- ther hit as a result of legal aid cuts. Many sets practising lage. Comparatively, the LPC carries less weight. in these areas pay their pupils very little. From Septem- ber 2019, the minimum funding award for pupillage in- Anecdotally our research suggests that high-paying creased to £18,436 per annum in London and £15,728 for commercial and Chancery sets tend to recruit most from those outside of London. This is good news for pupils at Oxbridge and unis like Durham and the redbricks, while the lowest-paying sets which have previously only paid family, common law and crime sets usually have pupils the bare minimum of £1,000 per month. But pay can still and juniors from a wider range of unis. be paltry at the junior end of the Bar – and bear in mind that some of your pupillage award can consist of guaran- teed earnings. The cost Put simply, it doesn’t make much financial sense to em- On chambersstudent.co.uk... bark on a Bar course if you aren’t fairly confident about • How much do barristers earn your prospects of succeeding at the Bar. Tuition is pain- fully steep – nearly £20,000 at some providers – and wan- nabe pupils by and large end up shouldering this cost (and that of the GDL if necessary) themselves. In fact, Of course, a set’s stature contributes greatly to its ten- former Bar Council chair Chantal-Aimée Doerries has ants’ incomes, and within each area of practice at the Bar reported to The Guardian that students may spent up to – including the ones above – are both Premier League sets an eye-watering £127,000 in total to qualify. Scholarships that pay handsomely and lower division ones that do not. aside, it’s easy to see why the Bar has long had a problem In any case, the difference in earnings between the top with diversity. and the bottom is substantial. Some sets will advance funds for the Bar course to future pupils. Your working style A final thing to think over is whether your personal char- Some sets will advance funds for the Bar course to future acteristics and preferred style of working are suited to pupils, but it’s worth bearing in mind this money comes the Bar. A QC once pointed out to us that “the Bar is a out of your pupillage award; it’s not given on top of it, as is world full of weird and wonderful characters,” and indeed typically the case with solicitors’ firms sponsoring future there’s no one ‘type’ of person who fits the bill. Still, there trainees. (You also don’t get the stipend for living expens- are fundamental aspects of being a barrister which don’t es that usually accompanies a law firm’s sponsorship or suit everybody – a knack for oral communication, for funding for the GDL.) Whatever way you slice it, getting starters.
Recommended publications
  • Michael D. Weinstein, Esquire 2015 Pegasus Scholar Report
    REPORT OF PEGASUS SCHOLAR Michael D. Weinstein, Esquire 2015 Pegasus Scholar Report For six weeks in spring 2015, my life seemed surreal. I spent my days walking through the august halls of some of the world’s most historic courthouses, marveling at the majestic architecture around me. I worked in an office that overlooked a one‐thousand‐year‐old church still in use today. For lunch, I dined in the place where William Shakespeare first unveiled Twelfth Night to the public. And I was regularly invited to visit High Court Judges, Court of Appeal Judges, even a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. My days often ended on the rooftop of my flat overlooking the lively neighborhood of Kensington, a stone’s throw from Freddie Mercury’s old mansion, reflecting on this remarkable chapter of my life. For a young lawyer, curious about the world and the law, I can think of few experiences that can be as meaningful or memorable as the one I had as a Pegasus Scholar. This report details those six weeks I spent living and working in London. My co‐scholar and flatmate, Tyler Garrett, has submitted his own report that provides a peek into his remarkable experience as a Pegasus Scholar. While Tyler and I lived together and visited judicial chambers together, most of our days were spent apart, working in different barristers’ chambers. So although our experiences were similar in many ways, they were also very different. Tyler’s report provides a great overview of legal London, including: a description of the differences between solicitors and barristers, and an explanation of how they work together to obtain the best result for their mutual client; how barristers’ chambers are organized; and the role of the English Inns of Court in fostering and promoting civility and professionalism in the practice of law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inns of Court
    1 Dr Peter Sillitoe, ShaLT Collection Enhancement Report No. 20 for the V&A, Theatre and Performance Department (May 2013) The Inns of Court NB: Earlier, the ShaLT Collection Enhancement Reports have used the printed collections at the National Art Library (particularly the unique Dyce Collection) to highlight printed texts in terms of issues such as authorship and genre. However, bearing in mind that the key outreach goal of the AHRC funding for the project was to further public awareness about the actual theatre sites (The Theatre, Blackfriars, and so on) it seems highly appropriate for a series of reports to focus on the actual theatre spaces. Thus, this report highlights the Inns of Court. Indeed, it is envisaged that the T&P Department at the V&A might be able to host a small exhibition of Dyce material in terms of the actual Shakespearean London Playhouses. With this in mind, this report picks-out printed work at the V&A that links to the Inns of Court. This topic should prove interesting to visitors to a potential exhibition because often the title page is the only evidence we have for the performance of a play at a certain location. The Inns of Court were established for the training of London's lawyers. But in this period the students often organised and acted in plays and masques at winter festival times at the Inn’s hall. Indeed, the Inns of Court still are London’s premier colleges for the training of lawyers (barristers and judges). In the Shakespearean period the four locations were sometimes referred to as ‘the third university’ after Oxford and Cambridge, since the young men who studied to qualify in the law - often wealthy and socially well-connected - occupied these elite spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Bar Council Meeting Held on Saturday 7 July 2012 at the Bar Council Offices Present: Michael Todd QC Chairman
    Minutes of the Bar Council meeting held on Saturday 7 July 2012 at the Bar Council Offices Present: Michael Todd QC Chairman Maura McGowan QC Chairman-Elect Stephen Collier Treasurer Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP Attorney General Mr Edward Garnier QC MP Solicitor General 61 further members of Bar Council attended. 1. Apologies Apologies for absence had been received from Keir Starmer QC, Dr Mirza Ahmad, Lesley Bates, Julia Beer, William Boyce QC, Lord Alex Carlile QC, Henry Carr QC, Michael Collard, Charlie Cory-Wright, Tom Crowther, Nicholas Cusworth QC, Lucy Frazer, Philippe Freund, Max Hardy, Fiona Jackson, Gregory Jones QC, Jennifer Josephs, Michael Kent QC, Taryn Lee QC, Fiona McCreath, Sailesh Mehta, Christina Michalos, Rick Pratt QC, Richard Salter QC, Geoffrey Tattersall QC, Francis Watson QC and Nicholas Worsley QC. 2. Approval of the Minutes and Matters Arising The minutes of the 14 April 2012 Bar Council meeting were approved. There were no matters arising from the minutes of the last meeting. 3. Statement by the Chairman The Chairman welcomed the Attorney General and Solicitor General and thanked them for making themselves available to attend. He also congratulated Nick Hilliard QC, Mark Lucraft QC and Philip Bartle QC, who have all been recently appointed to the Bench. The Chairman issued an interim statement in June due to the long gap between meetings and his statement for this meeting had also been circulated in advance. The Chairman said that he did not propose to read these aloud but asked if there were any questions. There were not. 4. BSB Report The BSB Chair's report had also been circulated prior to the meeting and Baroness Deech invited questions.
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London
    JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London • Unmissable human rights CPD event for 2018 • Keynote speeches from leaders in the field • Workshops on criminal justice, women’s human rights, earn judicial review, immigration and asylum, privacy, security and 6 cpd surveillance and life, death and human rights hours • The latest domestic and international human rights case-law • All income supports the work of JUSTICE Plenary speeches from: Panel sessions with: • Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill • Michael Fordham QC • Karon Monaghan QC • Harriet Wistrich • Angela Rafferty QC • Baroness Shami Chakrabarti • Nathalie Lieven QC • Max Hill QC • + many others to be confirmed follow us on twitter @justicehq PROGRAMME OF THE DAY Join JUSTICE 9.00 REGISTRATION AND REFRESHMENTS JUSTICE is an all-party law reform and human rights organisation working to strengthen the justice system – administrative, civil and 9.30 CHAIR’S WELCOME criminal – in the United Kingdom. Andrea Coomber, Director, JUSTICE 9.45 MORNING KEYNOTE ADDRESS: JUSTICE is independent JUSTICE is expert JUSTICE is influential Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill 10.15 REVIEW OF THE YEAR JUSTICE is effective JUSTICE is international Karon Monaghan QC, Matrix Chambers 11.00 COFFEE JUSTICE relies on the support of its members and donors for the funds to carry out its vital work. Please join us today. 11.30 MORNING WORKSHOPS 1. Criminal Justice and Human Rights 14.00 AFTERNOON WORKSHOPS “Access to justice, human rights and the rule of law – as a lawyer and as a Chair: HH Peter Rook QC democrat, I can think of few causes more important to defend and extend.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Welcome to the Latest Edition of Our Planning, Environment 1
    PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & PROPERTY NEWSLETTER 3 December 2020 INTRODUCTION Jonathan Darby Contents Welcome to the latest edition of our Planning, Environment 1. INTRODUCTION and Property newsletter. In Jonathan Darby what is our final edition before Christmas, we include articles 2. EIA JUDGE BUT NOT JURY: HIGH from James Burton (on the criteria for ensuring COURT SETS CRITERIA FOR ENSURING “appropriate separation” when EIA competent “APPROPRIATE SEPARATION” WHEN authority is also the promoter/developer) and EIA COMPETENT AUTHORITY IS ALSO Stephen Tromans QC (on Old Permissions, Master THE PROMOTER/DEVELOPER Plans and Estoppel). James Burton Should regular readers be in need of a ‘fix’ between now and early January when our next edition arrives 6. FRIENDS REUNITED: OLD PERMISSIONS, in your inboxes, then I commend the following: MASTER PLANS AND ESTOPPEL – THE LAW REVIEWED First, our ongoing webinars, which have continued Stephen Tromans QC apace over the past few months. As a result of which, our online archive hopefully now forms 9. CONTRIBUTORS PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & PROPERTY 3 December 2020 Page 2 something of a useful resource for those looking considered by the Hon. Mr Justice Holgate in to brush up or reflect on developments. The London Historic Parks and Gardens Trust Claimant archive can be accessed via: v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and www.39essex.com/category/webinars-archive/ Local Government [2020] EWHC 2580 (Admin). The Judge answered them by (a) upholding the UK’s Whilst on the topic of webinars, it’s worth noting transposition of (this aspect of) the EIA Directive, that Series 3 of our ’39 from 39’ webinars is and (b) by setting out practical criteria to achieve scheduled to kick off early in the New Year, with a “appropriate separation”.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates in Health and Safety and Environmental Law
    - List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates in Health and Safety and Environmental Law June 2019 Health & Safety Executive (HSE), Environment Agency (EA), Office of Rail and Road (ORR), Natural Resources Wales (NRW), Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), Care Quality Commission (CQC) 1 List A Region Counsel Call Address Telephone/Fax London & South ADJEI, Cyril 1995 Old Square Chambers, 11 Bedford Row, Tel: 020 7269 0300 East London, WC1R 4BU (DX 1046 London/Chancery Lane) London & South BADGER, Christopher 2002 6 Pump Court, Temple, London , EC4Y 7AR Tel: 020 7797 8400 East (DX 293 LDE) Fax: 020 7797 8401 London & South BALYSZ, Mark 1995 Crown Office Chambers, 2 Crown Office Row, Tel: 020 7797 8100 East Temple, London ,EC4Y 7HJ Fax: 020 7797 8101 (DX 80 London Chancery Lane) London & South BANWELL, Richard 1998 6 Pump Court, Temple, London , EC4Y 7AR Tel: 020 7797 8400 East (DX 293 LDE) Fax: 020 7797 8401 London & South BATES, Pascal 1994 6 Pump Court, Temple, London , EC4Y 7AR Tel: 020 7797 8400 East (DX 293 LDE) Fax: 020 7797 8401 London & South BEYNON, Richard 1990 Red Lion Chambers, 18 Red Lion Court, Tel: 020 7520 6000 East Temple, London, EC4A 3EB Fax: 020 7520 6248/9 (DX 478, London/Chancery Lane) London & South BUTT, Matthew 2002 3 Raymond Buildings, Gray's Inn, Tel: 020 7400 6400 East London , WC1R 5BH Fax: 020 7400 6464 (DX 237 LDE) London & South CHARBIT, Valerie 1992 Red Lion Chambers, 18 Red Lion Court, Tel: 020 7520 6000 East Temple, London, EC4A 3EB Fax: 020 7520 6248/9 (DX 478, London/Chancery Lane) London & South CROWE,
    [Show full text]
  • SCL2019 Brochure 190819 4.Pdf
    SCL (Singapore) Organised by: 2nd “Focus on Asia Conference” 2019 Wednesday, 11 Sep 2019, 6.30 - 9.00 pm Thursday, 12 Sep 2019, 9.00 am to 6.00 pm Hotel Fort Canning, 11 Canning Walk, Singapore 178881 Keynote Speaker: Sir Vivian Ramsey About this Conference Building on the strength of the community of Societies of Construction Law, this 2nd “Focus on Asia” Conference will bring together thought leaders from across the region to share with us recent innovative and expansive developments across the entire life-cycle of international construction projects that impact on all members of any project team - including the construction lawyers! SCL (Singapore) is pleased to have Sir Vivian Ramsey grace the occasion as our Keynote Speaker. Exclusive Conference Lanyard Sponsor: Participants will explore current trends, latest developments and the future direction of construction industry regulation across the region as well as the challenges and opportunities, across the supply chain, presented by current and planned major projects Exclusive Conference in Asia. Bag Sponsor: This Conference aims to bring together senior legal practitioners, in-house counsel and construction industry stalwarts from around the region to discuss the future of our industry as well a platform to network informally with delegates and speakers. Gold Sponsors: Who Should Attend • Architects, developers, contractors, engineers, project managers, consultants, managing Silver Sponsor: agents, management corporations and other professionals involved in the construction Contract
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritius's Constitution of 1968 with Amendments Through 2016
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 constituteproject.org Mauritius's Constitution of 1968 with Amendments through 2016 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 Table of contents CHAPTER I: THE STATE AND THE CONSTITUTION . 7 1. The State . 7 2. Constitution is supreme law . 7 CHAPTER II: PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL . 7 3. Fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual . 7 4. Protection of right to life . 7 5. Protection of right to personal liberty . 8 6. Protection from slavery and forced labour . 10 7. Protection from inhuman treatment . 11 8. Protection from deprivation of property . 11 9. Protection for privacy of home and other property . 14 10. Provisions to secure protection of law . 15 11. Protection of freedom of conscience . 17 12. Protection of freedom of expression . 17 13. Protection of freedom of assembly and association . 18 14. Protection of freedom to establish schools . 18 15. Protection of freedom of movement . 19 16. Protection from discrimination . 20 17. Enforcement of protective provisions . 21 17A. Payment or retiring allowances to Members . 22 18. Derogations from fundamental rights and freedoms under emergency powers . 22 19. Interpretation and savings . 23 CHAPTER III: CITIZENSHIP . 25 20. Persons who became citizens on 12 March 1968 . 25 21. Persons entitled to be registered as citizens . 25 22. Persons born in Mauritius after 11 March 1968 . 26 23. Persons born outside Mauritius after 11 March 1968 .
    [Show full text]
  • Student Days at the Inns of Court
    STUDENT DAYS AT THE INNS OF COURT.* Fortescue tells us that when King John fixed the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster, the professors of the municipal law who heretofore had been scattered about the kingdom formed themselves into an aggregate body "wholly addicted to the study of the law." This body, having been excluded from Oxford and Cambridge where the civil and canon laws alone were taught, found it necessary to establish a university of its own. This it did by purchasing at various times certain houses between the City of Westminster, where the King's courts were held, and the City of London, where they could obtain their provisions. The nearest of these institutions to the City of London was the Temple. Passing through Ludgate, one came to the bridge over the Fleet Brook and continued down Fleet Street a short distance to Temple Bar where were the Middle, Inner and Outer Temples. The grounds of the Temples reached to the bank of the Thames and the barges of royalty were not infrequently seen drawn up to the landing, when kings and queens would honor the Inns with their presence at some of the elaborate revels. For at Westminster was also the Royal Palace and the Abbey, and the Thames was an easy highway from the market houses and busi- ness offices of London to the royal city of Westminster. Passage on land was a far different matter and at first only the clergy dared risk living beyond the gates, and then only in strongly-walled dwellings. St.
    [Show full text]
  • Careers at the Chancery Bar
    Careers at the Chancery Bar With the right qualifications, where you come from doesn’t matter, where you’re going does. “if you are looking for a career which combines intellectual firepower, communication skills and the ability to provide practical solutions to legal problems, then your natural home is the Chancery Bar” 2 Chancery Bar Association Chancery Bar Association 1 Welcome to the Chancery Bar Do you enjoy unravelling the knottiest of legal problems? Would you relish the prospect of your appearances in court helping to develop cutting-edge areas of law? How does advising major commercial concerns to put together a complex transaction appeal? Would you like to assist organisations to achieve their commercial goals, and support and guide individuals at times of great personal stress? If your answer to any of these questions is “Yes”, then the Chancery Bar may be the career for you. Barristers who specialise in the areas of property, business and finance law most closely associated with the Chancery Division of the High Court are called “Chancery barristers” and, collectively, the “Chancery Bar”. Of the 15,000 barristers practising in England and Wales, about 1,200 specialise in Chancery work. Most are based in London but there are other important regional centres, such as Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds and Manchester. In recent years the nature of Chancery work has changed dramatically. It still includes the important work traditionally undertaken in the Chancery Division, but the expansion and development of commercial activity, together with the increasingly complex matters that arise out of that activity, have widened its scope significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Pupillage: What to Expect
    PUPILLAGE: WHAT TO EXPECT WHAT IS IT? Pupillage is the Work-based Learning Component of becoming a barrister. It is a 12- 18 month practical training period which follows completion of the Bar Course. It is akin to an apprenticeship, in which you put into practise everything you have learned in your vocational studies whilst under the supervision of an experienced barrister. Almost all pupillages are found in sets of barristers’ chambers. However, there are a handful of pupillages at the ‘employed bar’, which involves being employed and working as a barrister in-house for a company, firm, charity or public agency, such as the Crown Prosecution Service. STRUCTURE Regardless of where you undertake your pupillage, the training is typically broken down into two (sometimes three) distinct parts or ‘sixes’. First Six First six is the informal name given to the first six months of pupillage. It is often referred to as the non-practising stage as you are not yet practising as a barrister in your own right. The majority of your time in first six will be spent attending court and conferences with your pupil supervisor, who will be an experienced barrister from your chambers. In a busy criminal set, you will be in court almost every day (unlike your peers in commercial chambers). In addition to attending court, you will assist your supervisor with preparation for court which may include conducting legal research and drafting documents such as advices, applications or skeleton arguments (a written document provided to the court in advance of a hearing). During first six you will be required to attend a compulsory advocacy training course with your Inn of Court.
    [Show full text]
  • N Easy Access of Both Central London and Heathrow.”
    The international journal of gacommercial and treaty arbitratiron NEWS Advocacy workshop comes to the UK Tom Toulson Friday, 04 June 2010 The Foundation for International Arbitration Advocacy is running a workshop outside its base in Switzerland for the first time. The workshop on the questioning of expert witnesses will take place over the first three days in July at Beaumont House. Twenty-four participants will get the chance to cross-examine experts from FTI Consulting and Ernst & Young - and will receive feedback on live and video-recorded performances. The sessions will be run by experienced arbitration specialists, who will also give demonstrations and lectures. The FIAA was established in 2007 to provide training to lawyers from different jurisdictions in the art of advocacy tailored to arbitration. According to one of the founders, David Roney, The international journal of a partner at Schellenbergg Wittmeracomme rincial Geneva,and treaty arbitrati rtheon decision to bring the workshops outside Switzerland is part of an international strategy. “By taking our workshop to other major arbitration centres and developing markets, we aim to make them accessible to a broader audience by reducing travel costs. We chose Beaumont House in Windsor because it offers first-rate residential conference facilities and is within easy access of both central London and Heathrow.” The organisation plans to run its next workshop in São Paulo in the autumn of 2010. Based on those who have registered for the July event already, Roney expects half the participants will be from the UK and half from countries in Europe and North America. The course costs £985, which also covers accommodation and meals.
    [Show full text]