Dynamic Toll Prediction Using Historical Data on Toll Roads

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dynamic Toll Prediction Using Historical Data on Toll Roads Dynamic Toll Prediction Using Historical Data on Toll Roads: Case Study of the I-66 Inner Beltway Sara Zahedian*, Amir Nohekhan, Kaveh Farokhi Sadabadi Center for Advanced Transportation Technology, University of Maryland, United States * Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract Providing the users of a dynamic tolling system with predictions of tolling prices and the travel time difference between the toll road and the alternative routes enables them to make their travel decisions before starting their trip. This study aims to provide accurate predictions of tolling price through training and testing random forest, multilayer perceptron, and long short-term memory models and compare them with the current situation that the best prediction is extending the current toll to the next timesteps. The prediction time horizon includes five 6-minute time intervals ahead of the present time. The prediction performance of models over the testing set reveals that while all the models were significantly better than the base model, the random forest outperforms all models. For instance, while in the trained models, the mean absolute error range is from $1.5 to $2.5 for the next six minutes to the next 30 minutes, respectively, the same measure in the base model is in the range of $2.5 to $6. The prediction of travel time difference along the toll road and its alternative route with the shortest travel time revealed that the multilayer perceptron performs marginally better than the base model. However, due to a relatively stable travel time difference, the current travel time difference is an acceptable prediction for the next 30 minutes prediction horizon. Keywords: Dynamic tolling, Toll prediction, Machine learning, High-occupancy toll lanes, Travel time 1. Introduction This study aims to train and investigate various machine learning models to predict the toll price based on the historical data for facilities with dynamic tolling. Moreover, it examines the travel time difference between the toll facility and the alternative route with the shortest travel time for different prediction horizons to build a complete picture of the system's performance under the dynamic tolling scheme. The implementation of dynamic tolling systems is an efficient manner for reducing traffic congestion (Zhang et al., 2008; Yin and Lou, 2009). In a dynamic tolling system, the price that users should pay to use the toll facility or enter a congested region is determined based on the travel demand at each particular time interval. In theory, the users alter their trip start time, mode choice, route choice, or other decisions based on the tolling amount (Button and Verhoef, 1998; Yang and Huang, 2005). Therefore, the effectiveness of a dynamic tolling system not only relies on an optimal tolling scheme (Zhu and Ukkusuri, 2014) but also on providing an accurate prediction of the tolling price and the time which can be saved using the toll facility to the users in advance (Mahmassani and Jayakrishnan, 1991; Noland, 1997; Knorr et al., 2014; Qi et al., 2020). This study contributes to the literature in predicting the toll price and travel time difference between the toll facility and the best alternative route for different timesteps without any knowledge of the operator's tolling algorithm. Therefore, the introduced models predict the amount of toll by extracting the interaction pattern between users and the operator. Such prediction is beneficial to users by reducing the uncertainty of their generalized travel costs. Moreover, such interactive communication between the users and the operator can minimize public opposition in implementing toll facilities (Odeck and Kjerkreit, 2010; Gu et al., 2018). Besides, it provides useful information to the system operator because unlike the actual toll set based on the existing algorithms, the predicted toll is estimated based on the historical data. Therefore, the operator can use it to gain insight into the users’ interactions with the system in practice. This study uses three well-known machine learning models, namely, Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Long short-term memory (LSTM), to address the toll prediction problem. These models are trained using the historical data of the I-66 interstate inside the Capital Beltway, which is one of the most debating tolling facilities in the United States. This route is a High Occupancy Toll (HOT) facility during the rush hours in peak traffic direction. The dynamic toll fare is set every 6-minute to maintain a speed of 55 miles per hour along the corridor. This study uses the data of travel time, traffic flow, and the amount of toll over approximately 18 months and trains models that, given the data of the time t, predict the amount of toll for the next five 6-minute time intervals (i.e., t+6, t+12, …, t+30 minutes). The introduced models' performance is compared against the existing condition in which the best toll estimation available to the users is the current toll amount provided by the operator online1. Additionally, this study analyzes the travel time difference between the toll road and its alternative routes during the same prediction horizon to investigate the system performance and its predictability from the users' reaction perspective. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews the related studies of the problem in transportation literature; then, we provide an overview of the study area in section 3. Section 4 explains the data sources used in this study and describe them for the study area. Section 5 provides more details about the methodology we used to address the toll prediction problem; whose numerical results are presented in Section 6. The last section summarizes the study framework and concludes the findings. 2. Literature Review The ever-increasing demand for transportation in urban areas has long been a significant source for the transportation network's reduced service level. Transportation network pricing is a well-known strategy (Lindsey and Verhoef, 2001) and among the most successful travel demand management schemes that aim to use the existing infrastructure more efficiently by internalizing the external costs of congestion (Zhang et al., 2008; Yin and Lou, 2009). In addition to reducing congestion, another advantage of a pricing scheme is generating revenue for transportation authorities, which can be leveraged in improving the transportation supply and specifically the public transportation (Szeto and Lo, 2008; Zhu and Ukkusari, 2015). However, an optimal tolling strategy needs to conform to the users' time-dependent travel demand profile, which mandates a dynamic tolling scheme (Liu et al., 2009). Road pricing strategies can be categorized based on various characteristics, such as the tolling scheme (de Palma and Lindsey, 2011). There are two primary road pricing schemes of cordon pricing and link-based pricing. In cordon pricing, vehicles entering a specified urban area should pay a cost, while in link-based pricing, vehicles traversing a road (or specific lanes of a road) should pay a toll. While cordon pricing is more prevalent in Europe and Asia, link- based pricing is more implemented in the US (Lou et al., 2011). Another approach to categorize road pricing is based on the time differentiation of the toll. Flat, time of day, responsive and anticipatory tolls are examples of such categorization (de Palma and Lindsey, 2011). Responsive and anticipatory dynamic tolling have entered the state of 1 https://vai66tolls.com/ the practice more recently (Yin and Lou, 2009). The examples of such tolling are mostly limited to HOT facilities to maintain free-flow speed. The operator of the HOT lanes in a dynamic tolling strategy regulates the toll price to manage the single- occupancy vehicles (SOV) users of the road, thereby maintaining a desirable level-of-service (LOS) on the facility (Gardner et al., 2013). The SOV users decide whether to pay the toll and reduce travel time or use the regular facilities, typically experiencing a higher travel time. Therefore, the tolling price results from an interaction between the users and the system's operator, which in theory can improve the performance of both HOT and General-purpose (GP) lanes (Zhang et al., 2013). There are various techniques to implement dynamic tolling given the intelligent transportation systems (ITS) advancements in recent years. For a comprehensive up to date literature review of the studies in this area, readers may refer to Saharan et al. (2020). While there are a handful of studies on the theoretical approaches to take for dynamic tolling at the design level, the number of researches on addressing the problems at an operational level is limited. The few studies in this area are mostly focused on descriptive analysis of the traffic condition in the locations with dynamic tolling on the HOT lanes such as I-394 MnPASS (Goodall and Smith, 2010) and I-15 San Diego (Borrell-Rovira and Supernak, 2011). However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, no study in the literature addresses the toll prediction problem. Therefore, this study contributes to the literature in predicting the toll price and travel time difference between the toll facility and the best alternative route for different prediction horizons. There are several aspects of transportation operation and planning that have benefited from predicting the travel behavior and traffic flow characteristics (Sekula et al., 2018; Baee et al., 2019; Ahmed et al., 2020; Taghipour et al., 2020; Zahedian et al., 2020). Similarly, dynamic toll price prediction is beneficial to the users and operator since this variable impacts the travelers' behavior and, subsequently, the operator's response. From a user's viewpoint, this prediction is advantageous in estimating a more accurate cost for her trip, directly impacting the route choice, departure time, and mode choice. From the operator's perspective, providing toll prediction to the users can flatten the corridor's traffic volume profile, thereby reducing traffic congestion.
Recommended publications
  • Congestion Pricing
    Congestion Pricing A PRIMER December 2006 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Office of Transportation Management, HOTM 400 Seventh St. SW, Room 3404 Washington, DC 20590 Publication Number: FHWA-HOP-07-074 Table of Contents I. THE CONGESTION PROBLEM .....................................................................................................................1 Costs of Congestion ........................................................................................................................................1 Alarming Trends ...............................................................................................................................................1 Causes of Congestion .....................................................................................................................................1 II. WHAT IS CONGESTION PRICING? ..............................................................................................................1 Technology for Congestion Pricing .................................................................................................................2 Variably Priced Lanes ......................................................................................................................................2 Variable Tolls on Roadways .............................................................................................................................3 Cordon Pricing .................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Technologies That Enable Congestion Pricing a Primer Quality Assurance Statement
    Technologies That Enable Congestion Pricing A PRIMER Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Contents The Primer Series and the Purpose of This Volume 2 Congestion-Pricing Options 4 Functional Processes for Tolling and Congestion Charging 6 Primary Tolling and Pricing-System Components 7 Paper-Based Systems 7 Manual-Toll Facilities 8 Image-Based Tolling/Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Technology 9 DSRC Free-Flow Toll Using Transponders and Gantries 9 VPS Technologies 11 Cellular Telephone and Pico-Cell Systems 12 Combination Systems 13 Sub-System Technologies 14 Informing and Providing Standardized Signs and Lane Markings 14 Vehicle-Occupancy Detection Technologies 15 Vehicle-Identification and Classification Systems 15 Telecommunications: Roadside and Centralized Control Equipment 16 Automation of Operations 17 Payment Systems for Pre- and Post-Payment of Tolls and Charges 17 Secondary Enforcement 18 System Reliability and Accuracy of DSRC Systems 18 OBU Distribution Facilities 19 ITS Integration 19 Acronym List/Glossary 20 References 23 The Primer Series and the Purpose of This Volume States and local jurisdictions are increasingly dis- About This Primer Series cussing congestion pricing as a strategy for improv- The Congestion Pricing Primer Series is part of FHWA’s outreach efforts ing transportation system performance. In fact, to introduce the various aspects of congestion pricing to decision-makers many transportation experts believe that conges- and transportation professionals in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane to High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lane Conversions Guidebook
    Office of Operations 21st Century Operations Using 21st Century Technology Considerations for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane to High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lane Conversions Guidebook U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration June 2007 Considerations for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) to High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Conversions Guidebook Prepared for the HOV Pooled-Fund Study and the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Prepared by HNTB Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. 8283 Greensboro Drive McLean, VA 22102 Under contract to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) June 2007 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or the use thereof. The contents of this Report reflect the views of the contractor, who is responsible for the accu- racy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation. This Report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers named herein. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the objective of this document. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-08-034 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Consideration for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) to High Occupancy Toll June 2007 (HOT) Lanes Study 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Martin Sas, HNTB. Susan Carlson, HNTB Eugene Kim, Ph.D., Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Electronic Toll Service (EETS)
    The European Electronic Toll Service (EETS) GUIDE FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE DIRECTIVE ON THE INTEROPERABILITY OF ELECTRONIC ROAD TOLL SYSTEMS “This brochure comprises the text of a working document of the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Union and the European Electronic Toll Service — Guide for the application of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Commission Decision 2009/750/EC.” Europe Direct is a service to help you fi nd answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Offi ce of the European Union, 2011 ISBN 978-92-79-18637-0 doi:10.2833/6832 © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Cover photo courtesy of: N.V. WESTERSCHELDETUNNEL. FOREWORD Effi cient transport networks are essential to the competitiveness of our economies. EU internal market success and sustainable mobility greatly rest on the availability and effi cient operation of an adequate road network. Road transport continues to grow apace, with congestion and bottlenecks aff ecting an ever growing part of the network. But road infrastructure cannot be extended forever: we need better overall traffi c management in order for it to be used to its full capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Facilities in the United States
    TOLL FACILITIES US Department IN THE UNITED of Transportation Federal Highway STATES Administration BRIDGES-ROADS-TUNNELS-FERRIES February 1995 Publication No. FHWA-PL-95-034 TOLL FACILITIES US Department of Transporation Federal Highway IN THE UNITED STATES Administration Bridges - Roads - Tunnels - Ferries February 1995 Publication No: FHWA-PL-95-034 PREFACE This report contains selected information on toll facilities in the United States. The information is based on a survey of facilities in operation, financed, or under construction as of January 1, 1995. Beginning with this issue, Tables T-1 and T-2 include, where known: -- The direction of toll collection. -- The type of electronic toll collection system, if available. -- Whether the facility is part of the proposed National Highway System (NHS). A description of each table included in the report follows: Table T-1 contains information such as the name, financing or operating authority, location and termini, feature crossed, length, and road system for toll roads, bridges, tunnels, and ferries that connect highways. -- Parts 1 and 3 include the Interstate System route numbers for toll facilities located on the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways. -- Parts 2 and 4 include a functional system identification code for non-Interstate System toll bridges, roads, and tunnels. -- Part 5 includes vehicular toll ferries. Table T-2 contains a list of those projects under serious consideration as toll facilities, awaiting completion of financing arrangements, or proposed as new toll facilities that are being studied for financial and operational feasibility. Table T-3 contains data on receipts of toll facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Toll Collection Approaches, Technologies, Experiences
    PIARC – International Seminar Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) in Road Network Operations Electronic Toll Collection Approaches, technologies, experiences Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Fritz Busch / Dr.-Ing. Andreas Rau Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control Technische Universität München 14 to 16 August 2006 Electronic Toll Collection F. BUSCH, A. RAU – August 2006 11 Contents Objectives and Technologies Applications and Experiences Resume and Perspectives Electronic Toll Collection F. BUSCH, A. RAU – August 2006 22 Objectives of Road Pricing Road Pricing and Toll Collecting… shall increase market driven processes in transportation to balance demand and supply offer – when used with flexible fees – opportunities to control the spatial distribution of traffic volumes within the network influence the timely distribution of traffic volumes support the shift of demand to other transportation modes may contribute to financing and maintaining the transportation infrastructure offers a market for added-value services via the installed ITS-technologies Electronic Toll Collection F. BUSCH, A. RAU – August 2006 33 Principles of Tolling Principle 1: The fees are approach- or entrance-oriented Payments are needed when the vehicles enter the priced section or network part; fees are independent of intensity of usage Examples: Vignette (CH, since 1985), 'Pickerl' (A, since 1997) Principle 2: The fees are usage-oriented i.e. depend on time and/or length Technologies of usage of priced road-network Applications Electronic Toll Collection F. BUSCH, A. RAU – August 2006 44 Technologies Currently, the following technologies are in use / discussion: Toll Collection: manual collecting DSRC = Dedicated Short Range Communication Video, ANPR (automatic number plate recognition), LPR (License Plate Recognition) Tag / Transponder / RFiD – Recognition (electronic license-plate) GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) W-LAN / W-MAX Vehicle Classification: Inductive loops Laser scanner Weigh-in-Motion Video Tags / RFiD Electronic Toll Collection F.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT Price Elasticity of American Toll Roads: Historical Evidence, Panel Data Analysis, and Policy Implications
    FINAL REPORT Price Elasticity of American Toll Roads: Historical Evidence, Panel Data Analysis, and Policy Implications Date of report: August 2017 Jeong Yun Kweun, Graduate Research Assistant, George Mason University Shanjiang Zhu, PhD, Assistant Professor, George Mason University Jonathan Gifford, Professor, George Mason University Prepared by: Side and Reva Dewberry Department of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, George Mason University 4400 University Drive, MS 6C1, Fairfax, VA, 22030 Prepared for: Transportation Informatics Tier I University Transportation Center 204 Ketter Hall University at Buffalo Buffalo, NY 14260 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Price Elasticity of American Toll Roads: Historical Evidence, August 2017 Panel Data Analysis, and Policy Implications 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jeong Yun Kweun, Shanjiang Zhu, Jonathan Gifford 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS CEIE, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, 11. Contract or Grant No. MS6C1, Fairfax, VA, 22030 DTRT13-G-UTC48 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered US Department of Transportation Office of the Final 10/2015 – 08/2017 UTC Program, RDT-30 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Empirical analysis of price elasticity on U.S. toll roads is urgently needed in policy debates and investment decision-making as the transportation infrastructure needs grow rapidly and the market for Private-Public Partnership is expanding in many States. This project first reviews the historical evidence on toll elasticity reported in literature, and then developed a database of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • European Electronic Toll Service (EETS)
    Department of Transport, Ireland National Electronic Register for the European Electronic Toll Service National Electronic Register for the European Electronic Toll Service European Electronic Toll Service (EETS) The objective of EETS is to aims enable road users to use by means of a single contract and a single on-board unit, to pay in all EETS domains throughout the whole European Union where tolls are levied electronically. EETS is based on the 'Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community', the 'Commission Decision of 6 October 2009 on the definition of the European Electronic Toll Service and its technical elements' which further elaborates on the Directive, and ‘Directive (EU) 2019/520 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitating cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the Union’. EETS National Electronic Register In accordance with Article 21 of the Directive (EU) 2019/520, Member States are to keep a national electronic register containing information on the EETS domains within their territories as well as EETS providers to whom they have granted registry. This register was put in place from 16th January 2012 and will be updated as and when required. Last updated: 23/10/2020. The Department of Transport explicitly states that the information contained in this national register may be subject to change in the future. Entities identified as Toll Chargers in this register can be removed from the register.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy
    Toll Roads in the United States: History and Current Policy History The early settlers who came to America found a land of dense wilderness, interlaced with creeks, rivers, and streams. Within this wilderness was an extensive network of trails, many of which were created by the migration of the buffalo and used by the Native American Indians as hunting and trading routes. These primitive trails were at first crooked and narrow. Over time, the trails were widened, straightened and improved by settlers for use by horse and wagons. These became some of the first roads in the new land. After the American Revolution, the National Government began to realize the importance of westward expansion and trade in the development of the new Nation. As a result, an era of road building began. This period was marked by the development of turnpike companies, our earliest toll roads in the United States. In 1792, the first turnpike was chartered and became known as the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike in Pennsylvania. It was the first road in America covered with a layer of crushed stone. The boom in turnpike construction began, resulting in the incorporation of more than 50 turnpike companies in Connecticut, 67 in New York, and others in Massachusetts and around the country. A notable turnpike, the Boston-Newburyport Turnpike, was 32 miles long and cost approximately $12,500 per mile to construct. As the Nation grew, so did the need for improved roads. In 1806, the Federal Government passed legislation to fund the National Road, known as the Cumberland Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Toll Revenue Report Analyzes Traffic, Transactions, Revenue and I-PASS Trends for the Year 2019
    Annual Toll 20 Revenue Report 20 The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXECUTIVE STAFF Chairman Directors Ex-Officio Members Executive Director Will Evans Steven L. Davis JB Pritzker José Alvarez Governor Alice Gallagher Vice Chairman Omer Osman Chief Engineering Officer Karen McConnaughay Jim Connolly Illinois Secretary Paul Kovacs Scott Paddock of Transportation Gary Perinar Chief Planning Officer Rocco Zucchero Jim Sweeney Chief Financial Officer Cathy Williams Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 2 | TRANSACTIONS AND REVENUES 34 System Description 2 Introduction 35 Highlights 2 Traffic Profile 35 Transactions 4 Historical Transactions and Revenues 39 Revenues 4 Transactions and Revenues by Route and Vehicle Type 48 Electronic Toll Collection 5 Revenues by Plaza 50 1 | TOLLWAY SYSTEM 6 Chapter 2 Summary 59 Report Purpose 7 Introduction 7 3 | ELECTRONIC TOLL COLLECTION 60 Introduction 61 System History 7 Electronic Toll Collection History 61 Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (I-90/I-39) 11 Current I-PASS Trends 63 Tri-State Tollway (I-94/I-294/I-80) 13 Active Transponders 66 Reagan Memorial Tollway (I-88) 15 E-ZPass Group 66 Veterans Memorial Tollway (I-355) 17 Other Agencies 69 Illinois Route 390 Tollway 19 Cashless Tolling 70 Toll Collection 20 Chapter 3 Summary 72 Major Construction Projects in 2018 31 Chapter 1 Summary 32 ENDNOTES 74 2 Executive Summary The Illinois Tollway’s 2020 Annual Toll Revenue Report analyzes traffic, transactions, revenue and I-PASS trends for the year 2019. System Description • Constructing a new, cashless interchange to connect the Tri-State Tollway (I-294) to I-57. Phase one opened in October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Tolls and Road Pricing Innovative Methods to Charge for the Use of Road Systems
    Road Tolls and Road Pricing Innovative Methods to Charge for the Use of Road Systems by Daphnée Benayoun & René P. Cousin The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Introduction Major challenges facing now the road transport sector In a context of: ¾ Sparse public budget & projected decrease of revenues generated by fuel taxes ¾ High road transport travel demand growth rate Major challenges: ¾ Finance highway infrastructures ¾ Mitigate growing road traffic congestion ¾ Improve road safety ¾ Reduce pollution & Environmental disturbances of road transport Innovative methods to road user charging Traditional methods Set tariffs to achieve cost recovery Innovative methods: introducing road pricing Set tariffs to achieve cost recovery, manage transport demand and optimize utilisation of infrastructure capacity Innovative Methods to Road User Charging Three different approaches 1. Electronic toll collection systems Using new technologies to minimize collection costs and be able to use varied tariff structures 2. Managed lanes & Mileage-based user charging systems Using Road Pricing methods to combine cost recovery goals with traffic demand management objectives 3. Urban tolls Using Road Pricing to reduce traffic congestion and disturbances in severely congested metropolitan areas Electronic Toll Collection Systems Eliminating waiting time at toll booths and reducting collection costs Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) captured by camera Significant billing error rate Significant cost of transaction processing User identification via in-vehicle
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Impacts of Road Pricing Summary and Conclusions 170 Roundtable CPB Corporate Partnership Board
    CPB Corporate Partnership Board The Social Impacts of Road Pricing Summary and Conclusions 170 Roundtable CPB Corporate Partnership Board The Social Impacts of Road Pricing Summary and Conclusions 170 Roundtable The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.
    [Show full text]