DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 Cedar County Financial Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 Cedar County Financial Statement 2015 Cedar County Financial Statement PART A - COUNTY FUNDS SUB-TOTAL 490.00 REVENUES GENERAL ROAD & ASSESSMENT LAW ELECTION TOTAL 24,658.53 REVENUE BRIDGE ENFORCEMENT SALES TAX BUILDING & GROUNDS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT FUND ATIS ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS LLC ANNUAL BOILER PRESSURE TEST 120.00 FUND BALANCE 01/01/2015 541,621.53 10,519.89 59,649.96 9,198.79 ATLAS SECURITY SERVICE INC PARTS/LABOR ELEVATOR CAMERA COMPLIANCE 1,073.00 RECEIPTS CARD SERVICES SUPPLIES/PARTS 174.45 PROPERTY TAX 393,968.21 182,798.42 0.00 0.00 CITY OF STOCKTON UTILITIES 954.58 SALES TAX 511,994.78 0.00 0.00 561,501.66 DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 25.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 75,028.66 597,552.23 152,403.28 273,322.68 EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC UTILITIES 15,132.42 SERVICES 157,031.23 0.00 0.00 71,474.18 FLEETWOOD SERVICES LLC PEST CONTROL 96.00 INTEREST 1,829.23 287.12 219.12 35.74 GOLD MECHANICAL BOILER REPAIR 819.00 OTHER REVENUES 50,237.14 1,077.24 10,270.65 7,438.14 HARRY COOPER SUPPLY PLUMBING PARTS/SUPPLIES 56.64 TRANSFERS IN 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 KENCO FIRE EQUIPMENT INC EXTINGUISHER INSPECTIONS, TESTING & SUPPLIES 40.00 SUBTOTAL 1,191,089.25 781,715.01 162,893.05 918,772.40 KT’S LUNCH BOX MEETING 40.95 LAKESIDE CARPET INTERIORS PAINT SUPPLIES 150.42 TOTAL AMOUNT AVAILABLE 1,732,710.78 792,234.90 222,543.01 927,971.19 LIGHT BULB DEPOT LIGHT BULBS 57.00 EXPENDITURES -1,642,014.37 -654,977.66 -175,570.18 -864,174.62 ME-SHY LOCKSMITH LLC DOOR LOCK PARTS/LABOR 127.86 ADJUSTMENTS 92.30 0.00 0.00 -92.30 MEEK’S - EL DORADO SPRINGS GROUNDS SUPPLIES 56.45 FUND BALANCE 12/31/2015 90,788.71 137,257.24 46,972.83 63,704.27 MISSOURI DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY ANNUAL ELEVATOR INSPECTION 25.00 MISSOURI GAS ENERGY UTILITIES 7,892.93 GENERAL REVENUE DISBURSEMENTS MODERN COPY SYSTEMS COPIER PARTS/LABOR 140.00 COMMISSION DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PAPENFUHS, TAMMIE MOWING 2,300.00 COLLINS, MARLON TRAINING MILEAGE 130.00 PETTY CASH FUND - CO CLERK KEYS 6.00 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ASSOC OF MO DUES & TRAINING 1,113.92 QUILL CORPORATION MISC SUPPLIES 107.83 HOLIDAY INN - EXECUTIVE CENTER TRAINING LODGING 377.84 RELIABLE OFFICE SUPPLY BATTERIES 19.18 MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES DUES & TRAINING 615.00 RONS ELECTRIC LLC PARTS/LABOR 774.90 TAN-TAR-A RESORT TRAINING LODGING 456.85 SAC RIVER BUILDING SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES 75.29 SUB-TOTAL 2,693.61 SPRINGFIELD JANITOR SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 3,306.79 STOCKTON FARMERS EXCHANGE SUPPLIES 5.79 PAYROLL DESCRIPTION AMOUNT STOCKTON TRUCK & WELDING SIDEWALK DRAIN COVER 75.00 COLLINS, MARLON GROSS SALARY 29,059.94 THE OTHER PLUMBER LLC PARTS/LABOR 622.90 BOULTINGHOUSE, DONALD GROSS SALARY 27,060.02 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT 2,854.16 FOX, JOHN A GROSS SALARY 27,060.02 WEST POLK SANITATION TRASH SERVICE 960.00 SUB-TOTAL 83,179.98 WINDSTREAM MISSOURI, INC. ELEVATOR PHONE 946.12 COMMISSION TOTAL 85,873.59 SUB-TOTAL 39,035.66 COUNTY CLERK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PAYROLL DESCRIPTION AMOUNT BOLIVAR OFFICE EXPRESS LLC OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.00 DRAKE, AMY F GROSS SALARY 13,886.88 CARD SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.08 SUB-TOTAL 13,886.88 HEALY PC LLC SERVICE CONTRACT/REPAIRS 968.09 BUILDING & GROUND TOTAL 52,922.54 LCN GRAPHICS LLC LIQUOR LICENSE 48.00 PETTY CASH FUND - CO CLERK POSTAGE/SUPPLIES 145.94 EMPLOYEE EXPENSES DESCRIPTION AMOUNT QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 891.54 DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY UNEMPLOYMENT TAX 1,290.14 RELIABLE OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES 25.44 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FICA 31,845.32 U.S. POST OFFICE - STOCKTON POSTAGE 588.00 KEYBANK RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 45,074.88 WINDSTREAM MISSOURI, INC. PHONES 2,456.72 MIDWEST PUBLIC RISK OF MISSOURI W/C INSURANCE 10,727.58 SUB-TOTAL 5,137.81 PRINCIPAL LIFE GROUP GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 709.46 UNITED HEALTHCARE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 66,887.33 PAYROLL DESCRIPTION AMOUNT EMPLOYEE EXPENSES TOTAL 156,534.71 KENNEY, PEGGY GROSS SALARY 40,999.92 COLLINS, MARLON GROSS SALARY 1,363.56 TREASURER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT HAMBY, BRENDA GROSS SALARY 22,011.00 CARD SERVICES TRAINING LODGING 246.10 WAINSCOTT, KAREN GROSS SALARY 18,105.17 HEALY PC LLC SERVICE CONTRACT/REPAIRS 924.99 YORK, HEATHER GROSS SALARY 24,960.00 MILLER, RONNIE TRAINING MILEAGE & MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 397.30 SUB-TOTAL 107,439.65 MISSOURI ASSOC OF COUNTIES TRAINING 120.00 COUNTY CLERK TOTAL 112,577.46 MISSOURI COUNTY TREASURERS’ ASSOC. TRAINING REGISTRATION & DUES 400.00 QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 85.01 ELECTION DESCRIPTION AMOUNT TAN-TAR-A RESORT TRAINING LODGING 182.74 CARD SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.61 U.S. POST OFFICE - STOCKTON POSTAGE 49.00 DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS INC ELECTIONS MACHINE SOFTWARE 1,575.00 WINDSTREAM MISSOURI, INC. PHONE 494.84 EL DORADO SPRINGS SUN ADVERTISING 1,278.00 SUB-TOTAL 2,899.98 ELKINS-SWYERS CO. INC. ELECTION SUPPLIES & SHIPPING 101.88 HEALY PC, LLC SERVICE CONTRACT 240.00 PAYROLL DESCRIPTION AMOUNT HENRY M ADKINS & SON INC ELECTION SUPPLIES/SHIPPING 11,186.59 MILLER, RONALD R GROSS SALARY 40,999.92 LCN GRAPHICS, LLC STAMP 16.00 SUB-TOTAL 40,999.92 MARKETPLACE ADVERTISING 332.34 TREASURER TOTAL 43,899.90 MFA OIL COMPANY ELECTION TRAVEL FUEL 39.30 MISSOURI NOTARY SERVICE AND BONDING CO. NOTARY BOND/SUPPLIES 74.90 COLLECTOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NEIGHBOR NEWS ADVERTISING 520.00 BOLIVAR OFFICE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 320.77 PETTY CASH FUND - CO CLERK POSTAGE 0.18 HEALY PC, LLC SERVICE CONTRACT 100.00 QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 459.78 U.S. POST OFFICE - STOCKTON BOX RENTAL 54.00 THE STAR ADVERTISING 311.50 WINDSTREAM MISSOURI, INC. PHONE 2,034.66 U.S. POST OFFICE - STOCKTON POSTAGE 1,032.00 SUB-TOTAL 2,509.43 WINDSTREAM MISSOURI INC DSL 1,417.46 WOODS SUPERMARKET TRAINING SUPPLIES 30.91 PAYROLL DESCRIPTION AMOUNT SUB-TOTAL 18,638.45 HAINES, JOAN GROSS SALARY 40,999.92 ELDER, CASSANDRA GROSS SALARY 19,858.25 ELECTION PAYROLL DESCRIPTION AMOUNT FISHER, LORENE GROSS SALARY 10,559.01 ANDERSON, BERTA ELECTION JUDGE 100.00 WOOLDRIDGE, BECKI GROSS SALARY 2,557.50 BARGER, MARGIE ELECTION JUDGE 90.00 SUB-TOTAL 73,974.68 BEASON, SHIRLEY ELECTION JUDGE 90.00 COLLECTOR TOTAL 76,484.11 BOUGH, CAROLE ELECTION JUDGE 100.00 BURNS, PATTY ELECTION JUDGE 16.00 RECORDER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CHEEK, MICHAEL ELECTION JUDGE 114.60 AMERICAN MICRO COMPANY OUTPUT TO MICROFILM & SHIPPING 442.59 COLLINS, MARLON ELECTION JUDGE 8.00 HEALY PC, LLC SERVICE CONTRACT 200.00 DRAKE, AMY ELECTION JUDGE 16.00 WINDSTREAM MISSOURI, INC. PHONE 2,849.39 FISHER, LORENE ELECTION JUDGE 115.00 SUB-TOTAL 3,491.98 HAMBY, ROGER ELECTION JUDGE 105.80 HARRING, ROSE M ELECTION JUDGE 176.60 PAYROLL DESCRIPTION AMOUNT HEDGES, SHIRLEY ELECTION JUDGE 113.00 WILKERSON, CAROLE GROSS SALARY 40,999.92 JOHNSON, AMY ELECTION JUDGE 115.40 FISHER, LORENE GROSS SALARY 71.75 JOHNSON, REBECCA ELECTION JUDGE 127.80 HESKETT, MELISSA GROSS SALARY 18,535.03 JONES, JANET S ELECTION JUDGE 121.40 SUB-TOTAL 59,606.70 KEETON, ROBERT ELECTION JUDGE 117.00 RECORDER TOTAL 63,098.68 KOONTZ, DIANA ELECTION JUDGE 90.00 LEONARD, JAMES ELECTION JUDGE 117.00 CIRCUIT COURT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT LEONARD, JERL ELECTION JUDGE 127.80 AMERICAN STAMP & MARKING PRODUCTS INC STAMP & REPLACEMENT PAD 57.14 LEONARD, RUTH ELECTION JUDGE 115.00 ARCHIVAL METHODS OFFICE SUPPLIES 590.44 LEVI, JOE ELECTION JUDGE 113.00 CAVENER’S OFFICE SUPPLIES & FURNITURE OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,348.37 LEVI, NANCY ELECTION JUDGE 123.00 CEDAR COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK JURY SCRIPT 511.42 MANNING, JANICE ELECTION JUDGE 124.20 COMPUTER CABLE CONNECTIONS EQ PARTS/LABOR 740.20 MAYS, NANCY ELECTION JUDGE 117.00 EDCO GROUP INC EQ PARTS 198.11 NOTTINGHAM, PEGGY ELECTION JUDGE 105.00 ELKINS-SWYERS CO. INC. FORMS/SHIPPING 87.08 OWENS, ANNA ELECTION JUDGE 100.00 HENRY M. ADKINS & SON INC. FORMS 78.98 PAPENFUHS, TAMMIE ELECTION JUDGE 16.00 HOLLIDAY REPORTING SERVICE, INC. APPEARANCE FEE 125.00 PATE, GLENDA ELECTION JUDGE 90.00 KOLAR BUSINESS MACHINES EQ DIAGNOSTIC 20.00 POTTS, KENNETH N. ELECTION JUDGE 123.00 LCN GRAPHICS LLC COST SHEETS 119.00 PURSLEY, LARRY ELECTION JUDGE 90.00 MARKETPLACE ADVERTISING 352.00 ROY, BRENDA ELECTION JUDGE 90.00 MID-CONTINENT MICROGRAPHICS MICROFILMING, STORAGE MAINTENANCE & STORAGE 570.25 UNDERWOOD, DONNA ELECTION JUDGE 110.60 MODERN COPY SYSTEMS COPIER SUPPLIES 340.00 VENABLE, DOROTHY ELECTION JUDGE 116.60 PITNEY BOWES (1) POSTAGE SYSTEM RENTAL 525.12 VESTAL, CAROL ELECTION JUDGE 111.40 PITNEY BOWES INC SUPPLIES 590.40 WAINSCOTT, KAREN VOTER REGISTRATION CLERK 1,445.88 QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 56.99 WALLEN, DIXIE ELECTION JUDGE 119.00 U.S. POST OFFICE - STOCKTON BOX RENT 54.00 WELBORN, JOSEPH ELECTION JUDGE 100.00 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE (POSTAGE-BY-PHONE) POSTAGE 3,000.00 WELBORN, M. ELAINE ELECTION JUDGE 90.00 WINDSTREAM MISSOURI, INC. PHONES 5,371.82 WEST, JEAN ELECTION JUDGE 119.80 WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY INC BACKUPS 116.40 WILLIAMSON, MILDRED ELECTION JUDGE 123.80 SUB-TOTAL 5,852.72 YORK, RAMONA ELECTION JUDGE 117.40 ZUMWALT, JANE ELECTION JUDGE 8.00 PAYROLL DESCRIPTION AMOUNT SUB-TOTAL 5,530.08 SPURGEON, STACIE A GROSS SALARY 346.90 TURNER, SARAH GROSS SALARY 3,952.50 ELECTION POLES DESCRIPTION AMOUNT SUB-TOTAL 4,299.40 CITY OF EL DORADO SPRINGS RENT 250.00 CIRCUIT COURT TOTAL 20,152.12 HERRIMAN CHAPEL RENT 60.00 JERICO SPRINGS COMMUNITY CLUB RENT 60.00 COURT ADMIN DESCRIPTION AMOUNT POTTS, KENNETH (KRAM BUILDING) RENT 60.00 ANKROM AND ANKROM ATTORNEYS AT LAW GAL FEES 670.00 R&K RENT 60.00 BAKER LAW FIRM LLC GAL FEES 1,332.50 2 Cedar County FINANCIAL Statement CEDAR COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK JURY SCRIPT 1,894.12 WINDSTREAM MISSOURI INC PHONE 565.95 EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC PUBLIC DEFENDER UTILITIES 202.27 SUB-TOTAL 25,838.25 HENRY M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sac River Basin Watershed Summary 111315
    The State of Our Missouri Waters Sac River Watershed The Missouri Department of Natural Resources seeks to improve the availability of water resource information to communities where impact to these water resources is felt most. The information presented in this summary is intended to increase awareness of how activities on land and in water have an influence on water resource quality and quantity. The department greatly values local input and engagement regarding the mission of ensuring safe and ample water resources, and will continue to seek local guidance to further focus department efforts and funding strategies for the betterment of Our Missouri Waters. HUC-8: 10290106 September 2015 Sac River Watershed The State of Our Missouri Waters Key Points In the northern portion of the watershed, low dissolved oxygen levels in water bodies often Importance of cause negative impacts to aquatic life and create challenges for the watershed. These low dis- Water Quantity solved oxygen levels are often a result of excess organic materials, which consume oxygen, and may be discharged from wastewater treatment system types less effective in removing and Quality organics. Other sources of excess organics in water bodies may include excess animal waste, excess nutrient loads (fertilizer) and excess sedimentation from stream bank and erosion. Water shortages can have severe and expensive In the southern portion of the watershed, there are challenges regarding bacteria levels in wa- consequences. Adequate ter bodies, which can cause serious public health and recreational safety issues. Nonpoint water supplies are vital not sources of contamination, such as animal waste and contaminants carried by stormwater run- only to human health and off, can have a serious cumulative impact on surface waters in a largely rural watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dade Countycounty Missourimissouri States...And It Territories...For the Protection of Life and Property
    National Weather Service “To provide weather and flood Natural Hazard Risk Assessment warnings, public forecasts and Information For: advisories for all of the United DadeDade CountyCounty MissouriMissouri States...and it territories...for the protection of life and property. Information Provided By WFO Springfield, Mo National Weather Service 2009 Update Includes data and information through December 2008 5808 W Hwy EE Springfield, Mo. 65802 Phone: 417-864-8535 Email: [email protected] [email protected] National Weather Service Table of Contents Local Climatology Averages and records for Lockwood, Missouri in Dade County Overview of Weather Hazards in Southwest Missouri 2 Normal Normal Normal Normal Record Record Record Record Historical information for Dade County Missouri 3 High Low Precip. Snow High Low Precip. Snow Tornado Information 4 Jan 42 22 1.95 5.5 76 -22 8.67 21.8 Severe Hail, Lightning, Wind and Winter Weather 5 Feb 49 27 2.30 3.8 84 -29 7.11 16.5 Flooding 6 Mar 59 36 3.68 3.0 92 -4 10.06 26.6 Heat , Drought, and Wildfires 7 Apr 69 45 4.22 0.1 91 17 11.28 8.0 Dam Failure 8 Historic Weather in Southwest Missouri 9 May 77 54 4.95 0 98 29 14.30 0 Local Climatology 10 Jun 85 63 5.16 0 104 44 11.67 0 Jul 90 68 4.14 0 116 47 17.89 0 Aug 90 66 3.84 0 108 45 11.13 0 Sept 82 58 4.96 0 108 31 16.23 0 Oct 71 47 3.96 0 95 17 12.53 0.5 Nov 57 36 4.25 0.9 87 1 9.98 20.5 Dec 46 26 2.89 3.2 78 -17 6.74 15.0 Links for Climate information www.crh.noaa.gov/sgf/ www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ www4.ncdc.noaa.gov This document is intended to provide general information on severe weather that has affected Dade County and the communities with in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Basin: Chance of Reaching Flood Stage in 2021 As Compared to Historical
    MISSOURI BASIN: CHANCE OF REACHING FLOOD STAGE IN 2021 AS COMPARED TO HISTORICAL 31 percent decrease in chance to reach flood stage during next 3 months NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 1 MISSOURI BASIN: Mountain Snowpack As of 10 February 2021 Mountain snowpack running near average in the north to well below average south. NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 2 MISSOURI BASIN: Mountain Runoff Volume April-September Mountain runoff volume projected to be below normal • Upper Missouri abv Ft. Peck: 86% • Yellowstone: 80% • North Platte: 60% • South Platte: 66% NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 3 MISSOURI BASIN: Plains Snowpack as of 11 February 2021 NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 4 MISSOURI BASIN: River Ice Conditions….and a new unfolding threat Photo courtesy Patrick Lonergan NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 5 MISSOURI BASIN: Flood Potential Outlook Nebraska Wahoo Creek: minor NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 6 MISSOURI BASIN: Flood Potential Outlook Iowa Little Sioux River: minor Big Sioux River: minor NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 7 MISSOURI BASIN: Flood Potential Outlook Kansas Big Blue River: minor Black Vermillion: minor Stranger Creek: moderate Little Osage R: moderate Marais des Cygnes: minor NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 8 MISSOURI BASIN: Flood Potential Outlook Missouri Tarkio River: moderate Chariton River: minor Grand River: moderate Wakenda Creek: minor Crooked River: moderate Moniteau Creek: minor Blackwater R: moderate Moreau River: minor Lamine River: moderate Marmaton R: minor Petite Saline Ck: moderate Big Piney River: minor Sac River: moderate Gasconade River: minor South Grand R: moderate Little Osage R: minor Big Creek: moderate Osage River: minor Platte River: minor NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE Building a Weather-Ready Nation // 9 MISSOURI BASIN: Flood Potential Outlook: Missouri River Below Gavins to St.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Sac River Bacteria TMDL
    LITTLE SAC RIVER WATERSHED FECAL COLIFORM TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD FAPRI-UMC Report #11-06 June 2006 Claire Baffaut Food & Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) University of Missouri Published by the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI), University of Missouri-Columbia, 2005 http://www.fapri.missouri.edu The Environmental Protection Agency Region 7 through the Missouri Department of Natural Resources has provided partial funding for this project under Section 319 of the Clean Water Act through a grant entitled “Integrated analysis of the Little Sac Watershed”. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri (FAPRI) is charged with providing objective, quantitative analysis to decision makers. Since 1984, this service has been provided to Congress and national trade associations, and has focused on commodity policy issues. In 1995, the unit was asked to expand its focus and begin to bring the same level of effort to environmental issues, that of providing objective, analytical support. The unit spent considerable time examining the problems and determined the area most lacking analysis was at the local level; the farm, the watershed, and the local community. Similar to the extensive peer-review effort the unit goes through on national commodity policy issues, the environmental analysis effort recognizes the strong need for local involvement. If the local people who must live with the analysis have doubts about the way the analysis was developed, then the effort is wasted.
    [Show full text]
  • County Location for Dade County
    Dade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Part 2: Community Profile Part 2: Community Profile Dade County Location Dade County is located in Southwest Missouri. Counties that border Dade are Barton and Jasper to the west, Cedar to the north, Polk and Greene to the east, and Lawrence to the south. The county covers 506.25 square miles, including 490.01 square miles of land and 16.24 square miles of surface water. Incorporated communities include the villages of Arcola, Dadeville and South Greenfield and the cities of Everton, Greenfield, and Lockwood. Unincorporated settlement areas include Bona in the northeastern corner of the county and Pennsboro is the south central section. Greenfield is the county seat. June 2014 – FEMA Approved Final Draft 2-1 Dade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Part 2: Community Profile Historical Overview The Dade County area was part of the area claimed by France until purchased by the United States in 1803 as part of the Louisiana Purchase. The area was first inhabited by the Sac, Delaware and Osage Indians; the Osage ceded the territory in 1808. The first settlers arriving in the early 1830s from Kentucky and Tennessee found fertile prairie soils, walnut timber, wild game, and rivers and creeks which provided drinking water for their animals. Dade County was created on January 29, 1841 from Barry County territory and was named after Major Francis L. Dade who was killed in the Seminole Wars; Greenfield was named the county seat (Aldrich, Dade County Soil Survey, p. 10). Growth of the cities was stimulated by railroad construction in 1881.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Sac River Watershed
    LITTLE SAC RIVER WATERSHED BACTERIAL SOURCE TRACKING ANALYSIS FAPRI-UMC Report #06-05 May 2005 Dr. Claire Baffaut, Dr. Charles A. Carson, and Wendi Rogers 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite E Columbia MO 65203 (573) 882-3576 www.fapri.missouri.edu Published by the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI), University of Missouri-Columbia, 2005 http://www.fapri.missouri.edu This material is based upon work supported by the Environmental Protection Agency, region VII through a grant entitled “DNA Source Tracking of Fecal E. Coli in the Little Sac River, Missouri,” (grant X7-98740401-0). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri (FAPRI) is charged with providing objective, quantitative analysis to decision makers. Since 1984, this service has been provided to Congress and national trade associations, and has focused on commodity policy issues. In 1995, the unit was asked to expand its focus and begin to bring the same level of effort to environmental issues, that of providing objective, analytical support. The unit spent considerable time examining the problems and determined the area most lacking analysis was at the local level; the farm, the watershed, and the local community. Similar to the extensive peer-review effort the unit goes through on national commodity policy issues, the environmental analysis effort recognizes the strong need for local involvement. If the local people who must live with the analysis have doubts about the way the analysis was developed, then the effort is wasted.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Enterprise Zone
    Enhanced Enterprise Zone Stockton and Cedar County, Missouri Creating and retaining new jobs is a priority for Cedar County and its economic development partners, the Cedar County Commissioners, Stockton Area Chamber of Commerce and City of Stockton. The Enhanced Enterprise Zone is a key component of the program for encouraging investment and job creation. The zone allows for local real property tax abatement and can provide state tax credits. Y OF IT C N KTO STOC Cedar County Courthose City of Stockton 113 South St., Stockton, 65785 Stockton Area Chamber of Commerce, Box 410, No. 23 1424 South St., Stockton, 65785 Public Square, Stockton, 65785 Enhanced Enterprise Zone Overview The Cedar County/City of Stockton Enhanced Enterprise Zone officially was designated by the Missouri Department of Economic Development Wednesday, July 16, 2014. The zone encompasses all of Stockton and all of Cedar County (the City of El Dorado Springs, which has its own EEZ) except a small portion in the northwest corner of the county north of El Dorado Springs. See the attached map. The Cedar County/City of Stockton EEZ encompasses available and commercial industrial property, some with a full range of public services including highways, air transportation and tele-communications. Authority for the Enhanced Enterprise Zone is contained in Chapter 135 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. The Act authorizes state tax credits and local property tax abatements. To qualify, a sole proprietorship, partnership or corporation must meet all the requiements of the Enhanced Enterprise Zone. Program Requirements To be eligible for Enhanced Enterprise Zone benefits, a business must meet certain requirements based on the type of business, amount of investment and the location of the facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Sac River – 10290106
    Sac River – 10290106 8 – Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile and Resource Assessment Matrix Sac River - 10290106 8 – Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile and Resource Assessment Matrix Profile Contents Page Summary 3 Introduction 4 Relief Map 6 Karst Features 7 Geologic Features 9 Common Resource Areas 11 Major Land Resource Areas 13 Average Annual Precipitation 17 Land Ownership 18 Land Slope 19 Land Use / Land Cover 21 Riparian Corridors 24 Highly Erodible Lands 26 Prime Farmlands 27 Census Data 29 CAFOs 33 Solid Waste and Wastewater Facilities 36 Drinking Water 38 Resource Concerns 39 Rapid Watershed Assessments - Matrix 54 Footnotes / Bibliography 65 This Project was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service through the Cooperative Conservation Partnership Initiative, the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, and the University of Missouri Extension. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Cedar Countycounty Missourimissouri States...And It Territories...For the Protection of Life and Property
    National Weather Service “To provide weather and flood Natural Hazard Risk Assessment warnings, public forecasts and Information For: advisories for all of the United CedarCedar CountyCounty MissouriMissouri States...and it territories...for the protection of life and property. Information Provided By WFO Springfield, Mo National Weather Service 2009 Update Includes data and information through December 2008 5808 W Hwy EE Springfield, Mo. 65802 Phone: 417-864-8535 Email: [email protected] [email protected] National Weather Service Table of Contents Local Climatology Averages and records for Stockton, Missouri in Cedar County Overview of Weather Hazards in Southwest Missouri 2 Normal Normal Normal Normal Record Record Record Record Historical information for Cedar County Missouri 3 High Low Precip. Snow High Low Precip. Snow Tornado Information 4 Jan 40 21 1.74 2.8 70 -16 4.27 15.0 Severe Hail, Lightning, Wind and Winter Weather 5 Feb 46 25 2.25 2.1 80 -14 6.43 15.5 Flooding 6 Mar 57 34 3.46 1.3 87 -1 8.87 14.0 Heat , Drought, and Wildfires 7 Apr 67 44 3.93 0 91 19 10.49 0.5 Dam Failure 8 Historic Weather in Southwest Missouri 9 May 76 54 5.13 0 93 30 11.67 0 Local Climatology 10 Jun 84 64 4.84 0 104 42 13.85 0 Jul 90 69 3.83 0 108 47 15.46 0 Aug 90 67 3.92 0 107 47 7.97 0 Sept 81 59 4.40 0 106 29 15.45 0 Oct 70 47 4.12 0 92 19 11.41 0 Nov 56 36 3.72 0.8 83 5 10.59 9.0 Dec 44 26 2.70 1.4 75 -18 6.51 14.7 Links for Climate information www.crh.noaa.gov/sgf/ www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ www4.ncdc.noaa.gov This document is intended to provide general information on severe weather that has affected Cedar County and the communities with in the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Sac River Healthy Watershed Plan
    SAC RIVER HEALTHY WATERSHED PLAN Sac River Healthy Watershed Plan Executive Summary Page 2 Chapter 1: Background & Introduction Page 3 Chapter 2: Collaborative Watershed Process DATE OF REPORT Page 8 OCTOBER 2016 Appendix A: Advisory Committee’s REPORT CREATED FOR Problems & Solutions Page 13 Appendix B: Community Meeting Survey Page 15 Appendix C: Survey Response Graphs Page 16 REPORT CREATED BY Appendix D: Complete Survey Results Page 18 SAC RIVER HEALTHY WATERSHED PLAN · 1 Executive Summary On May 1, 2015, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources awarded the Our Missouri Waters Collaborative project for the Sac River watershed to the Watershed Committee of the Ozarks. The goal of this project was to gather local input and identify water resource priorities through community meetings. Community meetings were held to reach citizens living and working in the Sac River water- shed, asking them to voluntarily serve on an advisory committee to identify and develop resources to achieve those priorities. Citizens, community leaders and elected officials in the watershed were invited to participate in this process to share how they use water and what is needed to continue protecting and enhancing the Sac River watershed. The summary and recommendations of the process are outlined in this document, the Sac River Healthy Watershed Plan. This plan will be a living, working document to help maximize resources and focus watershed priorities over the next five years. To learn more about the Our Missouri Waters statewide initiative, visit http://dnr.mo.gov/omw/. 2 · WATERSHED COMMITTEE OF THE OZARKS CHAPTER 1 Background & Introduction Watershed Characteristics The Sac River watershed covers 1,981 square miles and Objectives includes Stockton, Fellows and McDaniel Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Regional Condition 7 Sensitive Aquatic Species Waters
    Sensitive Aquatic Species Waters Regional Condition 7 Sensitive Aquatic Species: Includes all mussel and hellbender species with a Federal status, including Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered (published in Federal Register). Curtis Pearlymussel (E) Pink mucket (E) Higgins Eye (E) Scaleshell (E) Fat pocketbook (E) Winged mapleleaf (E) Spectaclecase (E) Sheepnose (E) Snuffbox (E) Neosho mucket (E) Rabbitsfoot (E) Ozark Hellbender (E) 1. Belle Fountain/State Line Ditch – from the Route NN Bridge on the border of Pemiscot and Dunklin Counties, to the Missouri (Dunklin County)-Arkansas (Mississippi County) border, including all portions of the waterbody that make up the border between Missouri and Arkansas. 2. Big Piney River – from the confluence of Arthur Creek in Texas County to its confluence with the Gasconade River in Pulaski County. 3. Big River – from confluence of Belews Creek in Jefferson County to its confluence with the Meramec River in Jefferson/St. Louis Counties. 4. Black River – from the point of discharge from Clearwater Dam in Wayne County to the Missouri (Butler County)-Arkansas (Clay County) border in Butler County. 5. Bourbeuse River – from the confluence of Clear Creek in Phelps County to its confluence with the Meramec River in Franklin County. 6. Bryant Creek – from the confluence of Planer Branch in Douglas County to its confluence with the North Fork of the White River in Ozark County. 7. Cane Creek – from the confluence of Kenner Spring Branch in Butler County to the confluence of Harviell Ditch in Butler County. 8. Castor River – from the confluence of Pond Creek in Bollinger County including all unchannelized reaches to the Castor River Diversion Channel in Bollinger County.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Sac River Watershed Management Plan Is Necessary to Guide Stakeholders Within the Watershed As They Seek to Improve the Water Quality of the Little Sac River
    Watershed Committee of the Ozarks 320 N. Main Springfield, MO 65807 417-866-1127 417-866-1918(fax) www.watershedcommittee.org 2 Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures 4 Disclaimer 5 EPA Nine Critical Elements 6 Introducing the project 7-15 Mission and Purpose ................................................................................................... 5 History of Watershed Committee and Greene County SWCD ...................................... 5 Overview of the Little Sac River Watershed ................................................................ 7 Soils, Climate and Geologic Characteristics................................................................. 7 Hydrologic Setting ..................................................................................................... 8 Land Use ..................................................................................................................... 8 Historic Issues in the Watershed ................................................................................. 9 The Little Sac River, River Level View ....................................................................... 11 Describing the watershed with Maps 16-40 Relief ..................................................... 16 Precipitation ........................... 27 Landscape .............................................. 17 Karst Features ........................ 28-30 Streams .................................................. 18 303(d) Lakes and Streams ...... 31 Land Use/Land Cover............................
    [Show full text]